Suppressor cell induction in donor-specific transfused mouse heart recipients

Administration of donor-specific blood presenting major or minor foreign histocompatibility antigens to the mouse recipient improved heart allograft survival when a single transfusion of 0.25 ml was given to the recipient prior to transplantation. Multiple transfusions did not prolong allograft survival, which suggested a presensitization effect. In addition, when the single transfusion volume was reduced to 0.025 ml, no significant effect in prolongation of graft survival was observed. Thus the amount of blood transfused seemed to be a critical factor in achieving the transfusion effect. Splenic suppressor cells after transfusion and transplantation (as determined by adoptive transfer) were present during the stable maintenance phase of graft survival in transfused recipients with long-term surviving heart allografts. Also, an intact spleen was required to achieve improved allograft survival in mice transfused with donor-specific blood. Thus a mechanism for the favorable effect of blood transfusion may be the generation of splenic suppressor cells in response to transfusion followed by transplantation.     

Trafficking of donor-derived bone marrow correlates with chimerism and extension of composite allograft survival across MHC barrier

We proposed to evaluate differences between recipient's immune response to vascularized skin and combined vascularized skin/bone allografts, under a 7-day alphabeta-TCR plus cyclosporine (CsA) treatment protocol. Thirty-six transplantations were performed in six groups: group I (isograft control-vascularized skin graft; n=6); group II (isograft control-combined vascularized skin/bone graft; n=6); group III (allograft rejection control group-vascularized skin graft; n=6); group IV (allograft rejection control-combined vascularized skin/bone graft; n=6); group V (allograft treatment-vascularized skin graft; n=6); and group VI (allograft treatment-combined vascularized skin/bone graft; n=6). Isograft transplantations were performed between Lewis rats and allografts were transplanted across the MHC barrier from Brown Norway to Lewis rats. In the allograft treatment group, a combined alphabeta-TCR+CsA protocol was applied for 7 days. All groups were compared clinically, immunologically and histologically. Statistical significance was determined with two-tailed Student's t test. Indefinite graft survival was achieved in the isograft control group (>300 days). Allograft rejection controls rejected within 5 to 9 days posttransplant; chimerism levels were undetectable (<.5%). Allografts under the alphabeta-TCR+CsA protocol had significantly extended survival when skin was combined with bone (61-125 days) compared to vascularized skin allografts (43-61 days). Lymphoid macrochimerism was significantly higher in group VI than group V. Histology confirmed skin and bone viability. Combined vascularized skin/bone allografts had higher and sustained levels of donor-specific chimerism and extended allograft survival.     

Evidence for epitope spreading and active suppression in skin graft tolerance after donor-specific transfusion.

BACKGROUND: To clarify the controversial results in the literature regarding the role of donor-specific transfusion (DST) on allograft survival, we have examined the influence of the following on DST-induced allograft survival in a 2C transgenic mouse model: varying the time between DST and transplantation; the role of MHC disparities between donor and recipient; whether tolerance induced by DST spreads to skin allografts expressing other alloantigens; and whether cyclosporine (CsA) treatment could further modulate skin allograft tolerance after DST. METHODS AND RESULTS: The studies were performed in both 2C anti-Ld (MHC class I) transgenic and normal (nontransgenic) mice. Our data demonstrate that a single infusion of Ld-mismatched lymphocytes 7 days before transplantation leads to permanent acceptance of donor-specific skin allografts in both transgenic (58/58) and nontransgenic (8/8) mice in the absence of any other nonspecific immunosuppressive treatment. Pretransplantation DST from donors mismatched for more than one MHC antigen (Ag) has no beneficial effect on subsequent donor skin allograft survival. However, Ld plus multiple minor histocompatibility (mH) Ag-mismatched DST induced permanent acceptance of donor-specific skin allografts. Tolerance induced by one-locus Ld-mismatched DST spreads to skin allografts expressing either two-locus Ld or one-locus Ld plus multiple mH Ags. Administration of CsA after DST diminished skin allograft survival, rather than enhancing it, suggesting that tolerance in this model system is established by an active immunological process sensitive to CsA. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Pretransplantation infusion of Ld-mismatched lymphocytes in the presence or absence of multiple mH mismatches induces permanent survival of donor-specific skin allografts. (2) CsA abrogates DST-induced transplantation tolerance.     

Elimination of acute GVHD and prolongation of rat pancreas allograft survival with DST cyclosporine, and spleen transplantation

Allogeneic spleen transplantation has been shown to have a tolerizing effect on pancreas allograft survival in rats. In this study we examined the effect of blood transfusions and cyclosporine administration on both rat pancreas allograft survival and acute graft-versus-host disease in BN recipients of Lewis pancreas-spleen allografts. We found that in this strain combination significant pancreas allograft prolongation occurred when the spleen was included en bloc with the pancreas graft. However, 50% of these recipients developed GVHD and died. A single donor-specific transfusion delivered to BN recipients of Lewis pancreas and pancreas-spleen allografts did not extend graft survival, but precluded the development of GVHD. A short, 6-day, and long, 26-day, course of CsA to recipients of pancreas and pancreas-spleen allografts extended graft and animal survival times, although not indefinitely. All pancreas-spleen recipients of both CsA protocols died following acute GVHD. Combined DST and CsA (short and long-course) administration in pancreas-only allograft recipients was deleterious to graft survival, compared with CsA administration alone. However, in pancreas-spleen recipients, combined DST and CsA had an additive effect. Moreover, in DST and long-course CsA-treated pancreas-spleen recipients, indefinite graft survival occurred with no signs of acute GVHD. The beneficial effect of the spleen allograft on pancreas graft survival was not dependent upon GVHD, since splenic-induced prolongation of pancreas graft survival was observed in the F1-donor to parent-recipient combination.     

Induction of tolerance to heart transplants by simultaneous cotransplantation of donor kidneys may depend on a radiation-sensitive renal-cell population

BACKGROUND: To determine the mechanism by which cotransplantation of a donor kidney and heart allograft induces tolerance to both organs in miniature swine, we examined the renal elements responsible for tolerance induction. METHODS: Recipients received 12 days of cyclosporine, and transplants were performed across a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I mismatch. Group 1 animals received heart transplants (n=5); group 2 animals received heart and kidney allografts with no other manipulation (n=4); group 3 animals received heart transplants and donor-specific renal parenchymal cells (n=4); group 4 animals received heart and kidney allografts from lethally irradiated donors (n=7); group 5 animals received irradiated hearts and nonirradiated kidneys (n=2); group 6 animals received nonirradiated hearts and peripheral blood leukocytes from swine MHC matched to recipients and becoming tolerant to donor antigen (n=2); group 7 animals received nonirradiated hearts and donor-specific peripheral blood monocyte cells (PBMC) (n=2). RESULTS: Animals in group 1 developed vasculopathy and fulminant rejection by day 55. Animals in group 2 never developed vascular lesions. Parenchymal kidney cell infusion (group 3) did not prolong cardiac survival. Animals in group 4 developed arteriopathy by postoperative day (POD) 28. Group 5 recipients accepted allografts without vascular lesions. Adoptive transfer of leukocytes from tolerant swine (group 6) prolonged cardiac graft survival as much as 123 days, whereas donor PBMC infusion (group 7) did not affect cardiac survival or development of arteriopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosensitive elements in kidney allograft may be responsible for tolerance induction and prevention of chronic vascular lesions in recipients of simultaneous heart and kidney allografts.     

Effect of a single transfusion of donor-specific and nonspecific blood on skin allograft survival in mice

The effect of a single transfusion of donor-specific or nonspecific blood on skin allograft survival was studied in ALS-treated mice. In the weak H-2-incompatible C3H/He to B6AF1 combination, transfusion of outbred CF1 blood induced significant prolongation of C3H/He skin graft survival when given over a wide interval of days between transfusion and skin grafting. In contrast, donor-specific C3H/He blood was effective only when given 10 days before grafting. Transfusion of either red blood cells or lymphocytes separated from CF1 or C3H/He whole blood also prolonged C3H/He skin graft survival. In the relatively strong H-2 incompatible DBA/2 to B6AF1 combination, significant prolongation of DBA/2 skin grafts was induced only by transfusion of donor-specific DBA/2- and H-2-compatible BALB/c blood. A single transfusion of C3H/He or CF1 blood failed to prolong DBA/2 skin graft survival. In the strong H-2-incompatible DBA/1 to B6AF1 combination, donor-specific DBA/1 blood was effective in prolonging DBA/1 skin graft survival. These results demonstrate that the effectiveness of donor-specific or nonspecific blood is dependent on (1) the degree of H-2 incompatibility of donor-recipient pairs and (2) timing of the blood transfusion relative to skin grafting.     

The use of skin allograft with donor-specific tolerance in a rabbit model of full-thickness burn

Previous studies in our laboratory demonstrated that portal vein or intraosseous administration of donor bone marrow cells for modulation of the central immune system is likely to be beneficial for allograft tolerance induction in rabbits. We recently reported that the severity of host conditioning for donor-specific tolerance induction was reduced without loss of efficacy by using a single intraosseous injection of donor bone marrow cells without immunosuppressive agent administration or T cell depletion. We now further investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of skin allografting using donor-specific tolerance to treat full-thickness burns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dutch rabbits were used as recipients, and Japanese white rabbits were used as donors. Three experimental groups of burned rabbits were studied. Group I, allograft control; group II, allograft plus total-body irradiation; group III, allograft plus total-body irradiation and bone marrow infusion. Allograft survival times were determined by macroscopic and histopathologic examinations. RESULTS: Mean (S.D.) skin allograft survival was as follows: group I, 13.2 (4.1) days; group II, 15.2 (3.7) days; group III, 108.4 (14.3) days. CONCLUSION: We have shown the potential to perform long-term skin allografts by the induction of donor-specific tolerance in a rabbit model of burn.     

Variable response to donor-specific blood transfusion in the rat

In an attempt to study the generality of effect of donor-specific blood transfusions (DSBT) in inducing immunologic unresponsiveness, the survival rates of heart, pancreas, and skin allografts were compared in blood-pretreated animals. DSBT, when given in a single-dose or multiple-dose protocol, prolonged cardiac allograft survivals in some strain combinations (F----L, LBN----L), but not in others (BN----L, ACI----L, ACI----WF). Antilymphocyte serum further prolonged survivals in protocols in which blood pretreatment was effective, and proved capable of reversing a state of sensitization in rats treated with multiple small-volume transfusions. In no case did the protection afforded the cardiac allografts extend to pancreatic or skin allografts, even with the use of nonspecific immunosuppression and a weak histocompatibility barrier. Third-party cardiac allografts were not protected by the blood pretreatment, attesting to the specificity of the transfusion effect. Addition of azathioprine during the blood pretreatment neither interfered with nor significantly improved the results seen with transfusion alone. The graft prolongation that follows blood pretreatment appears to be influenced by many factors, such as donor-host histocompatibility, the specific tissue transplanted, the blood transfusion schedule, and the use of adjunctive immunosuppression--but presently it is an unpredictable phenomenon.     

Nutritional immunomodulation leads to enhanced allograft survival in combination with cyclosporine A and rapamycin, but not FK506

BACKGROUND: Recently, specific immunonutrients were found to increase experimental allograft survival when combined with cyclosporine A (CsA). This study compared the effect on rat cardiac allograft survival when nutritional immunomodulation was used with CsA, rapamycin (Rapa), or tacrolimus (FK506). METHODS: Intra-abdominal ACI to Lewis cardiac allografts were performed and assessed daily by palpation. Study groups included untreated controls and those receiving CsA, Rapa, or FK506. Rats were fed ad libitum with Impact diet (fortified with fish oil, arginine, and RNA) or standard rat food. Further study groups were transplanted that received a donor-specific transfusion in addition to immunosuppression and diet. RESULTS: Allograft survival was extended by combining Impact with CsA (45.3+/-19 days) and Rapa (165.3+/-52 days), but not FK506 (12.4+/-3.2 days). Mean graft survival in the Rapa/Impact group met criteria for functional tolerance. The addition of a donor-specific transfusion did not lead to graft survival advantages over similar groups not receiving a donor-specific transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The use of immunonutrients improves transplant outcome in animals treated with short courses of CsA and Rapa, but not FK506. These findings highlight the potential differences in the effects of nutritional immunomodulation with different immunosuppressive drugs in the treatment of transplant patients.     

Portal venous ultraviolet B-irradiated donor alloantigen prevents rejection in circumferential rat tracheal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Before tracheal transplantation can be considered as a method of reconstruction in patients with extensive circumferential tracheal defects, we must achieve a state of nontoxic, donor-specific tolerance so that the risks of such a transplant do not outweigh the benefits. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether a single intraportal injection of modified donor alloantigen achieves donor-specific immunosuppression for major histocompatibility complex-mismatched rat tracheal allografts. STUDY DESIGN: Buffalo (recipient) rats were pretreated with either a single portal-vein administration of ultraviolet B (UVB)-irradiated donor splenocytes (n = 4) or an intraportal inoculation of nonirradiated donor splenocytes (n = 4). Major histocompatibility complex-mismatched Lewis (donor) tracheal allograft segments were then grafted into treatment groups 7 days after donor-cell pretreatment. Tracheal rejection was assessed by histologic analysis, mucosal cilia motility, and in vitro immunologic assessment. RESULTS: The UVB-treated group demonstrated no acute or chronic rejection as well as complete functional recovery. In vitro immunologic assessment demonstrated a donor-specific hyporesponsiveness and donor allospecificity. Untreated animals and those receiving nonirradiated donor splenocytes showed acute rejection of their tracheal allografts. CONCLUSION: Recipient pretreatment with intraportally administered UVB-irradiated donor splenocytes prevents rejection of circumferential rat tracheal allograft segments by inducing a donor-specific immune hyporesponsiveness.     

Treatment with the humanized CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, hu5C8, prevents acute rejection of primary skin allografts in nonhuman primates.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic skin transplantation remains a rigorous test of any immune intervention designed to prevent allograft rejection. To date, no single, clinically available immunosuppressant has been reported to induce long-term primary skin allograft survival in primates. We have previously shown that treatment with the humanized CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, humanized 5C8 (hu5C8), induces long-term renal allograft survival in nonhuman primates. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of hu5C8 in preventing primary skin allograft rejection in rhesus monkeys. METHODS: Ten rhesus monkeys were transplanted with full-thickness skin allografts mismatched at both class I and class II major histocompatibility loci. Of these, two were given no treatment, five were treated with hu5C8 alone, and three received hu5C8 combined with whole blood donor-specific transfusion (DST). All recipients also received skin autografts for comparison. Animals were followed by inspection, serial biopsy, mixed lymphocyte culture, and alloantibody determination. RESULTS: Treatment with hu5C8 alone or hu5C8 plus DST greatly prolonged allograft survival. Rejection occurred in the untreated group within 7 days. Mean allograft survival in the monotherapy hu5C8 group was >236 days and in the DST group was >202 days; these differences were not significant. Rejection eventually occurred in most animals. Allograft survival was not correlated with the development of T cell hyporesponsiveness in mixed lymphocyte culture. Rejection was not predicted by the development of donor-specific alloantibody. CONCLUSION: These results show that treatment with the CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, hu5C8, greatly delays the onset of acute skin allograft rejection.     

Prevention of Acute Lung Allograft Rejection in Rat by CTLA4Ig

CTLA4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig), which binds with a high affinity to B7-1 and B7-2, interrupts T-cell activation by inhibiting costimulatory signal. CTLA4Ig has been used in hopes of achieving antigen-specific tolerance induction in several solid organ transplants. In lung allograft rejection, however, its use has been controversial in terms of its effect on prevention of rejection. In the present study, the effect of murine CTLA4Ig on rat-lung allograft rejection was investigated. Rat left-lung transplantation was performed in an RT1 incompatible donor (Brown Norway; BN)-recipient (F344) combination. All allografts (n = 12) without any treatment were rejected within 7 days after transplantation. A single injection of murine form CTLA41g at a dose of 100 microg intraperitoneally (ip) or intravenously (iv) on day 1 post-transplantation achieved long-term graft survival (>90days) in 2/5 (40%) and 3/8 (38%), respectively. Moreover, 6/7 (86%) allografts in rats that received iv injection of 500 microg CTLA4Ig survived more than 90days. Allograft survival in the CTLA4Ig 500 microg iv recipient group was significantly longer than that in the no-treatment control or control immunoglobulin group (p <0.01). Four out of seven recipients bearing functional allografts for more than 90 days with the CTLA4Ig treatment accepted donor-specific skin grafts, whereas all third-party skin grafts (n=3) were rejected. Prevention of rat-lung allograft rejection could be achieved by intravenous administration of CTLA4Ig, resulting in long-term allograft survival with acceptance of donor-specific skin grafts.     

Induction of immunologic tolerance to cardiac allograft by simultaneous blockade of inducible co-stimulator and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 pathway

BACKGROUND: Inducible co-stimulator (ICOS) is one of the most recently described members of the CD28 family, and it plays an important role in immune responses. To investigate the role of ICOS in allograft rejection, the authors studied graft survival after cardiac transplantation in mice. METHODS: Hearts from BALB/c mice were transplanted into C3H/He mice. Immunohistochemical staining and flow cytometry were performed. Monoclonal antibody to ICOS or ICOS-immunoglobulin (Ig) was injected intraperitoneally. The authors performed mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). RESULTS: ICOS was expressed strongly by graft-infiltrating cells during rejection of the allograft. Blockade of the ICOS pathway with anti-ICOS antibody and ICOSIg significantly prolonged graft survival time relative to that in untreated mice; however, all cardiac allografts were eventually rejected by a single treatment. Treatment with both ICOSIg and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) Ig induced not only long-term acceptance of the cardiac allograft but also donor-specific tolerance, which was shown by acceptance of donor but not third-party skin. Graft arterial intimal hyperplasia in these cardiac allografts was remarkably less than that in cardiac allografts treated with tacrolimus. Addition of anti-ICOS antibody or ICOSIg to MLR resulted in inhibition of T-cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of T-cell proliferation with ICOSIg and CTLA4Ig was more effective than that with ICOSIg alone. Thus, ICOS appears to be an important regulator of T-cell activation, and may be an effective therapy in clinical cardiac transplantation.     

The effect of nutritional immunomodulation on cardiac allograft survival in rats receiving mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine A, and donor-specific transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive drugs continue to pose significant risks such as infection, toxicity, or neoplasia when used in long-term therapy. The investigation of newer and safer combined treatment strategies that decrease the need for these drugs is becoming increasingly important. Immunonutrients are known to have significant modulating effects on the immune system. Feeding with Impact, a commercially available diet enriched with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA, recently has been shown to extend rat cardiac allograft survival when combined with a donor-specific transfusion (DST) and cyclosporine A (CsA). Because mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is now commonly used in the clinical setting, the current study was designed to examine the effect on rat cardiac allograft survival when MMF was added to this immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: Intra-abdominal ACI to Lewis heterotopic cardiac allografts were performed. Study groups included untreated controls and recipients receiving varying combinations of a DST (1 mL) on the day prior to engraftment, MMF 45 mg/kg/day from the day of transplant through postoperative day six, and CsA 10 mg/kg on the day prior to operation and 2.5 mg/kg from the day of transplant through postoperative day 6. Animals were fed ad libitum with Impact diet or standard lab chow. Graft survival was determined by cessation of a palpable heartbeat. RESULTS: Treatment with MMF led to a prolonged allograft survival over historical untreated controls. The combination of MMF with a donor-specific transfusion, Impact, or CsA was associated with an increase in graft survival over MMF alone. The addition of Impact to the combination of MMF and CsA resulted in further improvement. The most pronounced graft survival advantage was seen when Impact was combined with a DST and both of the immunosuppressive agents. One quarter of the animals in this group had a palpable donor heart beat at greater than 150 days, indicating functional tolerance in those animals. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of Impact diet to treatment groups in this study was associated with graft survival advantages when compared to most of the other study groups receiving a similar drug regimen and standard chow. These findings support the importance of nutritional influences on allograft survival, and highlight the potential of diet therapy when used with short courses of clinically relevant immunosuppressive drugs.     

Immunological studies in diabetic rat recipients with a pancreatic islet cell allograft in the brain

Intracerebrally (IC) transplanted outbred Wistar and inbred Lewis (AgB1/1) strain rat islets and pancreatic endocrine cells (PEC) were able to function for a prolonged period in nonimmunosuppressed diabetic inbred ACI (AgB4/4) rats across a major histocompatibility barrier. All recipients were sensitized to various degrees to the donor antigens, as demonstrated by circulating cytotoxic antibody, irrespective of the survival of the IC graft. Nevertheless, the antidonor antibody titers in the IC islet and PEC graft recipients were lower and peaked later when compared with ACI recipients that received an intraportal islet allograft. PEC were also transplanted IC in immunized ACI recipients. In recipients hyperimmunized by repeated splenocyte injections, accelerated PEC graft rejection was observed. In recipients with weaker immunization by intraportal whole islet allograft 2 months prior to the IC allograft, the IC PEC allografts were also rejected. To assess if ACI rats with long-term-functioning IC islet/PEC allograft developed tolerance to the donor antigens, these animals were transplanted with a donor-strain skin graft. The skin grafts were all rejected in a first-set fashion similar to normal control ACI rats. Also, 7/12 and 7/9 recipients rejected their functional IC islet or PEC allograft, respectively, following transplantation of a donor-strain skin allograft, thus indicating that the transplanted PEC maintained their antigenicity even after long-term survival of over 1 year in allogeneic recipients. The data indicate that the brain does possess immunoprotective properties for the islet/PEC allograft. The protection, however, is relatively weak and is possibly due to the paucity of the effector mechanism in the brain relative to that normally present systemically.     

Role of thymus in operational tolerance induction in limb allograft transplant model

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the role of host thymus in tolerance induction in composite tissue allografts (CTA) across major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barrier during a 7-day alphabeta- T-cell receptor (TCR)/ cyclosporine A (CsA) protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 62 limb allograft transplants were studied. Euthymic (group A) and thymectomized (group B) Lewis recipients (LEW, RT1(1)) received vascularized hind-limb allografts from hybrid Lewis x Brown-Norway (F1), (LBN, RT1(1+n)) donors. Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and skin grafting assessed donor-specific tolerance in vitro and in vivo, respectively. Flow cytometry determined the efficacy of immunosuppressive protocols and the presence of donor-specific chimerism. Immunocytochemistry revealed the presence of donor-specific cells in the lymphoid organs of recipients. RESULTS: Isograft transplants survived indefinitely. For thymectomized rats, the median survival time (MST) of limb allograft in non-treated recipients was 7 days; monotherapy with alphabeta-TCR extended MST to 16 days, and CsA therapy extended it to 30 days. Using the alphabeta-TCR/CsA protocol, the MST of allografts was 51 days. For euthymic rats, the MST of limb allograft in non-treated recipients was 7 days; monotherapy with alphabeta-TCR or CsA extended MST to 13 or 22 days, respectively. Treatment with alphabeta-TCR/CsA resulted in indefinite allografts survival (MST=370 days). MLR and skin grafting confirmed donor-specific tolerance in euthymic recipients. Flow cytometry showed stable chimerism in the euthymic rats and transient chimerism in thymectomized limb recipients. Immunoperoxidase staining revealed the persistence of donor-derived cells in the lymphoid tissues of euthymic recipients. CONCLUSION: We found that the presence of thymus was imperative for the induction of donor-specific tolerance in rat hind-limb composite tissue allografts using a alphabeta-TCR/CsA protocol.     

A comparison between pancreas and heart allotransplantation after administration of donor-specific antigen and cyclosporine

These experiments compared the effect of a five-day course (days - 1 to +3) of cyclosporine therapy coupled with pretransplant (day - 1) administration of donor-specific antigen (whole blood or splenocytes) on either pancreatic or heart allograft survival in the Buffalo to Lewis rat donor-recipient combination. CsA therapy alone significantly (P less than 0.001) prolonged both heart (16.2 +/- 1.6 days) and pancreas (12.5 +/- 1.5 days) graft survival when compared with nonimmunosuppressed control heart and pancreas grafts (7.7 +/- 1.8 and 7.9 +/- 1.0 days, respectively). Pretransplant transfusion with either 2 ml of BUF whole blood or 2 x 10(8) red cell-free splenocytes on day -1 also resulted in a significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of heart survival (14.0 +/- 1.2 and 14.0 +/- 1.6 days, respectively) but did not improve pancreas allograft survival (9.4 +/- 1.5 and 8.5 +/- 1.0 days, respectively). Combination CsA and antigen therapy further improved heart graft survival to 26.5 +/- 6.1 days (whole blood) and 28.8 +/- 5.8 days (splenocytes) but did not improve pancreas graft survival over that of CsA therapy alone. Extension of CsA therapy by adding two additional 3-day cycles on days 10-12 and 17-19 further improved heart graft survival both after CsA alone (35.2 +/- 3.2 days) and after CsA coupled with whole-blood transfusion (45.3 +/- 8.6 days), but did not have a salutary effect on pancreas allograft survival. Portal vein administration of donor antigen was equally effective as systemic inoculation in prolonging heart graft survival when the splenocytes were given alone (11.6 +/- 1.7 days). Conversely, pancreas allograft survival was not beneficially effected by portal antigen administration whether or not CsA was given. These data demonstrate the ability of pretransplant donor-specific antigen administration and short-term CsA therapy to significantly prolong rat heart allograft survival across a strong MHC histocompatibility barrier-but, surprisingly, they also demonstrate the failure of this regimen to have a salutary effect on pancreas allograft survival.     

Lack of correlation between the induction of donor class I and class II major histocompatibility complex antigens and graft rejection

The induction of donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens on nonrejected and rejected rat renal allografts was compared at various times after transplantation in two strain combinations, DA-to-PVG and LEW-to-DA. Graft rejection was prevented by preoperative donor-specific blood transfusion (DST). Quantitative absorption analysis and immunohistology were performed using monoclonal antibodies specific for donor class I and class II MHC antigens. A significant increase in the expression of donor MHC antigens, both class I and class II, was demonstrated on nonrejected as well as rejected kidneys after transplantation. A kinetic analysis showed that induction of donor class I antigens was accelerated on the nonrejected grafts, and by day 5 the nonrejected kidneys showed increased expression of class I antigen when compared with the rejected grafts (a 37- vs. a 25-fold increase in expression). Increased expression of donor class I antigens persisted on the nonrejected grafts and was still detectable on long-term-surviving kidneys, 50 days after transplantation. The magnitude of class II antigen induction was similar on both rejected and nonrejected grafts (8-fold by 5 days after transplantation). Immunohistology demonstrated that class I and class II antigens were induced on identical structures in the kidney in both situations. In particular the vessel endothelia, which do not express class II antigens in normal kidney, become strongly positive in both rejected and nonrejected grafts 5 days after transplantation. Although renal allograft rejection is completely suppressed in rats given a single donor-specific blood transfusion before transplantation, graft survival cannot be explained by the lack of induction of donor MHC antigens. Donor MHC antigens are induced on these nonrejected kidney grafts, and therefore they could act as target molecules for the effector cells that mediate graft destruction. Thus the induction of donor MHC antigens on tissue allografts should not be considered as indicative of a rejection response resulting in graft destruction.     

Viral infection abrogates CD8(+) T-cell deletion induced by costimulation blockade

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a single donor-specific transfusion (DST) plus a brief course of anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) prolongs skin allograft survival in mice. It is known that prolongation of allograft survival by this method depends in part on deletion of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells at the time of tolerance induction. Recent data suggest that infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) abrogates the ability of this protocol to prolong graft survival. METHODS: To study the mechanism by which viral infection abrogates allograft survival, we determined (1) the fate of tracer populations of alloreactive transgenic CD8(+) T cells and (2) the duration of skin allograft survival following treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb in the presence or absence of LCMV infection. RESULTS: We confirmed that treatment of uninfected mice with DST and anti-CD154 mAb leads to the deletion of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells and is associated with prolongation of skin allograft survival. In contrast, treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb in the presence of intercurrent LCMV infection was associated with the failure to delete alloreactive CD8(+) T cells and with the rapid rejection of skin allografts. The number of alloreactive CD8(+) cells actually increased significantly, and the cells acquired an activated phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Interference with the deletion of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells mediated by DST and anti-CD154 mAb may in part be the mechanism by which viral infection abrogates transplantation tolerance induction.     

Prolonged survival of donor-specific rat intestinal allograft by administration of bone-marrow-derived immature dendritic cells

It has been reported that intraportal administration of donor antigens induced donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. We studied here the effects of transplantation of BM-derived immature dendritic cells (imDCs) and mature DCs (mDCs) via portal vein on rat small intestinal allograft survival. This study comprised four treatment groups: 1) untreated controls; 2) FK506 alone; 3) intraportal donor-specific BM-derived imDCs transplantation+FK506; 4) mDCs/Tx+FK506. Allograft survival was minimal in control group (5.2+/-0.8 days) and maximal in imDC+FK506 group (28.4+/-3.0 days). The rats in mDC+FK506 group showed systemic inflammatory reaction due to GVHR, and died within 10 days after transplantation. The in vitro MLR reaction using imDCs was also strongly inhibited both in direct and indirect recognition pathways. The impact of imDCs for the specific induction of transplant tolerance may suggest that immunization with donor-specific imDCs has therapeutic potential in organ transplantation.