Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen as adjuvant hormonal therapy for oestrogen sensitive early breast cancer in post-menopausal women: Meta-analyses of monotherapy,sequenced therapy and extended therapy

Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces relapses and prolongs survival in patients with oestrogen sensitive breast cancer. Development of resistance is however common. Tamoxifen can be given for a maximum of five years; although the risk of recurrences remains high after this period. This review examines nine randomised controlled trials including 28 632 women, which studied aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as an alternative to tamoxifen in three treatment settings: monotherapy (instead of tamoxifen), sequenced therapy (tamoxifen is switched to an AI) and extended therapy (following adjuvant tamoxifen). Disease free survival was significantly improved for monotherapy (HR 0.89, [95% CI 0.83–0.96] p = 0.002) and sequenced therapy (HR 0.72, [0.63–0.83] p < 0.00001). There was no difference in overall survival for monotherapy (HR 0.94, [0.82–1.08] p = 0.39) or extended therapy (HR 0.86 [0.79–1.16] p = 0.67). Importantly, overall survival was prolonged for patients who switched from tamoxifen to AI therapy (HR 0.78 95%CI 0.68–0.91, p = 0.001).     

Initial treatment and changes in adjuvant endocrine therapy for early stage breast cancer

Clinical trials have shown that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are an important advance in the treatment of early stage breast cancer (ESBC), but practice patterns and the impact of treatment side effects of endocrine therapy in the community setting have not been extensively explored. This retrospective chart review describes practice patterns among patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for ESBC. Charts of 200 patients with confirmed stage I–IIIA breast cancer were reviewed. Patients received first-line treatment with tamoxifen (n = 96) or AIs (n = 104). Fifty-one patients completed a structured interview regarding symptom burden during therapy. Time to discontinuation or switching from first-line therapy did not vary by drug class (tamoxifen vs. AI). Musculoskeletal symptoms predicted time to switching among AI patients. Tamoxifen patients who switched to AIs tended to do so following clinical guidelines for use of AIs. Interview results showed that more anastrozole than tamoxifen patients cited side effects as the reason for switching.     

Aromatase inhibitors use and risk for cardiovascular disease in breast cancer patients: A population-based cohort study

BackgroundPrior studies regarding use of Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) have shown conflicting results. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether AIs use affects risk for CVD events in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.MethodsUsing a retrospective cohort study design, four CVD outcomes; heart failure or cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, acute ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack were compared with uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses according to exposure to endocrine therapy (use of AI, tamoxifen or AI/tamoxifen sequentially) or no endocrine therapy.ResultsIn total 15815 postmenopausal women, surgically treated to early breast cancer during 2006–2012, were included. No significantly increased risk for CVD events was observed in patients with AI use in the whole cohort. However, two subgroup analyses showed increased risk for CVD events in the AI/tamoxifen sequential group; heart failure in patients older than 75 years (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.44; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.32–4.54) and arrhythmia in patients without prior CVD (HR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.01–2.10). An increased risk for arrhythmia and acute ischemic heart disease in patients with at least four years of AI treatment compared with no or short-time exposure was observed (HR 2.12; 95% CI: 1.40–3.25 for arrhythmia; HR 2.03; 95% CI: 1.15–3.58 for ischemic heart disease).ConclusionOur results indicate an increased risk for ischemic heart disease and arrhythmia in patients treated for more than four years with AIs. This should be considered in the risk-benefit assessment concerning endocrine therapy.     

Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcome and toxicity in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women

The present meta-analysis examines randomized trials of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as alternatives to tamoxifen in three treatment settings: monotherapy, sequenced therapy and extended therapy. Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were chosen based on their similarity in terms of study design and included 34,070 post-menopausal women who had undergone surgery for estrogen-sensitive early breast cancer. DFS was significantly improved by AI monotherapy (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.89, p = 0.001), sequenced therapy (HR: 0.7, p < 0.00001) and extended therapy (HR: 0.62, p < 0.00001). All of the patients benefited significantly from sequenced therapy (HR: 0.81, p = 0.003), and hormone receptor-positive patients benefited from AI monotherapy (HR = 0.92, p = 0.046) with respect to OS. AI monotherapy conferred significantly lower risks for thromboembolic events (OR = 0.61; p < 0.001) and endometrial cancer (OR = 0.26; p < 0.001) compared with tamoxifen monotherapy; however, there was a greater risk of cardiovascular events (OR = 1.20; p = 0.030). Sequenced therapy was also superior in terms of endometrial cancer but was inferior with respect to fractures, thromboembolic and cardiovascular events.     

Long-term Effect of CPAP Treatment on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Resistant Hypertension and Sleep Apnea. Data From the HIPARCO-2 Study

BackgroundThere is some controversy about the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVE). However, the incidence of CVE among patients with both obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) ans resistant hypertension (HR) has not been evaluated. Our objective was to analyze the long-term effect of CPAP treatment in patients with RH and OSA on the incidence of CVE.MethodsMulti-center, observational and prospective study of patients with moderate-severe OSA and RH. All the patients were followed up every 3?6 months and the CVE incidence was measured. Patients adherent to CPAP (at least 4 h/day) were compared with those with not adherent or those who had not been prescribed CPAP.ResultsValid data were obtained from 163 patients with 64 CVE incidents. Treatment with CPAP was offered to 82%. After 58 months of follow-up, 58.3% of patients were adherent to CPAP. Patients not adherent to CPAP presented a non-significant increase in the total CVE incidence (HR:1.6; 95%CI: 0.96?2.7; p = 0.07). A sensitivity analysis showed that patients not adherent to CPAP had a significant increase in the incidence of cerebrovascular events (HR: 3.1; CI95%: 1.07?15.1; p = 0.041) and hypertensive crises (HR: 5.1; CI95%: 2.2?11.6; p = 0.006), but the trend went in the opposite direction with respect to coronary events (HR: 0.22; CI95%: 0.05?1.02; p = 0.053).ConclusionsIn patients with RH and moderate-severe OSA, an uneffective treatment with CPAP showed a trend toward an increase in the incidence of CVE (particularly neurovascular events and hypertensive crises) without any changes with respect to coronary events.     

New onset vasomotor symptoms but not musculoskeletal symptoms associate with clinical outcomes on extended adjuvant letrozole – Analyses from NCIC CTG MA.17

PurposeNew onset symptoms on adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for hormone receptor positive early breast cancer may associate with clinical outcomes. We performed this exploratory analysis of the association of new onset musculoskeletal (MSK) and vasomotor (VM) symptoms with clinical outcomes in the NCIC CTG MA.17 trial 5 years of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole after tamoxifen.MethodsSymptoms were collected at baseline, 1, 6, and every 12 months on study. Multivariate Cox Models adjusting for age, nodal status, duration of tamoxifen and prior chemotherapy were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) based on data collected before, and after, the unblinding between women with VM or MSK symptoms and those without.ResultsData post-unblinding showed new VM symptoms on extended letrozole significantly improved DFS and DDFS when occurring 1 month (DFS HR 0.52, 95% CI, 0.28–0.96; p = 0.04; DDFS HR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.24–0.99; p = 0.046) and 6 months (DFS HR 0.43, 95% CI, 0.24–0.78; p = 0.006; DDFS HR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.22–0.85; p = 0.02) after treatment initiation. Those with new VM symptoms at 12 months also had a significantly better DFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26, 0.84; P = 0.01) and a trend in improved DDFS. Only a trend to improved OS was found for those with VM symptoms 6 month after treatment. No significant improvement was found for those with new MSK symptoms at any time point or for any endpoint.ConclusionsNew onset VM symptoms with extended letrozole may be useful in predicting treatment benefit.     

Trends in endocrine therapy prescription and survival in patients with non-metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: A population based-study

PurposeTo identify prognostic factors of invasive–disease free survival (iDFS) in women with non-metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) in daily routine practice.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study using data from the Côte d’Or breast and gynecological cancer registry in France. All women diagnosed with primary invasive non-metastatic HR + BC from 1998 to 2015 and treated by endocrine therapy (ET) were included. Women with bilateral tumors or who received ET for either metastasis or relapse were excluded. We performed adjusted survival analysis and Cox regression to identify prognostic factors of iDFS.ResultsA total of 3976 women were included. Age at diagnosis, ET class, SBR grade, treatment, stage and comorbidity were independently associated with iDFS. Women who had neither surgery nor radiotherapy had the highest risk of recurrence (HR = 3.75, 95%CI [2.65–5.32], p < 0.0001). Receiving aromatase inhibitors (AI) was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (HR = 0.70, 95%CI [0.54–0.90], p = 0.055) compared to tamoxifen. Compared to women with no comorbidities, women with 1 or 2 comorbidities were more likely to receive AI (OR = 1.63, 95%CI [1.22–2.17], p = 0.0009).ConclusionsComorbidities, age at diagnosis and previous treatment were associated with iDFS in non-metastatic HR + BC patients. This study also showed that women who received tamoxifen for their cancer experienced worse iDFS compared to women treated with AI.     

Comparison of breast density assessment between human eye and automated software on digital and synthetic mammography: Impact on breast cancer risk

PurposeTo evaluate the agreement between automatic assessment software of breast density based on artificial intelligence (AI) and visual assessment by a senior and a junior radiologist, as well as the impact on the assessment of breast cancer risk (BCR) at 5 years.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively included 311 consecutive women (mean age, 55.6 ± 8.5 [SD]; range: 40–74 years) without a personal history of breast cancer who underwent routine mammography between January 1, 2019 and February 28, 2019. Mammographic breast density (MBD) was independently evaluated by a junior and a senior reader on digital mammography (DM) and synthetic mammography (SM) using BI-RADS (5th edition) and by an AI software. For each MBD, BCR at 5 years was estimated per woman by the AI software. Interobserver agreement for MBD between the two readers and the AI software were evaluated by quadratic κ coefficients. Reproducibility of BCR was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsAgreement for MBD assessment on DM and SM was almost perfect between senior and junior radiologists (κ = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84–0.92] and κ = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.82–0.90], respectively) and substantial between the senior radiologist and AI (κ = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.73–0.84). There was substantial agreement between DM and SM for the senior radiologist (κ = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74–0.84). BCR evaluation at 5 years was highly reproducible between the two radiologists on DM and SM (ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97–0.98] for both), between BCR evaluation based on DM and SM evaluated by the senior (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.95–0.97) or junior radiologist (ICC = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96–0.98) and between the senior radiologist and AI (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.95–0.97).ConclusionThis preliminary study demonstrates a very good agreement for BCR evaluation based on the evaluation of MBD by a senior radiologist, junior radiologist and AI software.     

TBS and BMD at the end of AI-therapy: A prospective study of the B-ABLE cohort

IntroductionPatients with breast cancer under aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment often develop osteoporosis and their average bone loss rate is twice that of natural reduction during menopause, increasing fracture risk. As the current diagnostic technique based on bone mineral density (BMD) provides no information on bone quality, the Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) has been proposed to reflect bone microarchitecture status. The present study was designed to assess prospective changes in TBS and lumbar spine (LS) BMD in postmenopausal women with breast cancer at completion of AI treatment.MethodsB-ABLE is a prospective cohort of 735 women with breast cancer treated with AIs according to American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations: 5 years of AI starting within 6 weeks post-surgery or 1 month after the last cycle of chemotherapy (5y-AI group), or switching to an AI to complete 5-year therapy after 2–3 years of tamoxifen (pTMX-AI group). Patients with osteoporosis were treated with oral bisphosphonates (BP). TBS and LS-BMD changes at completion of AI therapy were evaluated by Student t-test for paired samples. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed for correlations between LS-BMD and TBS.ResultsAI treatment was completed by 277 women. Of these, 70 (25.3%) were allocated to BP therapy. The non-BP-treated patients (74.7%) showed significant decreases in TBS (− 2.94% in pTMX-AI and − 2.93% in 5y-AI groups) and in LS-BMD (− 4.14% in pTMX-AI and − 2.28% in 5y-AI groups) at the end of AI treatment. In BP-treated patients, TBS remained stable at the end of AI treatment, whereas LS-BMD showed significant increases (+ 2.30% in pTMX-AI and + 5.33% in 5y-AI groups). Moderate associations between TBS and LS-BMD values at baseline and at the end of AI treatment (r = 0.4; P < 0.001) were observed. At the end of treatment, changes in spine BMD and TBS were weakly correlated (r = 0.1, P < 0.01).ConclusionsAI therapy induces significant decreases in TBS, comparable to BMD loss. BP-treated patients maintained TBS values, whereas BMD increased. AI treatment leads to deterioration of bone microarchitecture, which seems to be attenuated by BP therapy.     

Internal mammary node irradiation in node-positive breast cancer treated with mastectomy and taxane-based chemotherapy

BackgroundIt is important to continually reevaluate the risk/benefit calculus of internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in the era of modern systemic therapy. We aimed to investigate the effect of IMNI on survival in node-positive breast cancer treated with mastectomy and anthracycline plus taxane-based chemotherapy.MethodsWe analyzed 348 patients who underwent mastectomy and anthracycline plus taxane-based chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer between January 2006 and December 2011. All patients received postoperative radiation therapy (RT) with IMNI (n = 105, 30.2%) or without IMNI (n = 243, 69.8%). The benefit of IMNI for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using multivariate analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for unbalanced covariates between the groups.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 95 months, the 10-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate, DFS, and OS in all patients were 94.8%, 77.4%, and 86.2%, respectively. The IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the association of IMNI (vs. no IMNI) with DFS and OS was 0.208 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.045–0.966) and 0.460 (95% CI, 0.220–0.962), respectively. In multivariate analysis, IMNI was a favorable factor for DFS (HR, 0.458; P = 0.021) and OS (HR 0.233, P = 0.018).ConclusionsIMNI was associated with improved DFS and OS in node-positive patients treated with mastectomy, post-mastectomy RT, and taxane-based chemotherapy, although the rate of locoregional recurrence was low.     

Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer according to hormonal receptor status

ObjectiveFor patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, the prognostic impact of pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear when stratified by hormonal receptor (HR) status; however, the impact of pCR on survival when stratified by hormonal receptor (HR) status is uncertain.Patients and methodsThis multicenter retrospective study investigated the predictors of pCR and its prognostic value in Japanese patients 366 HER2-positive breast cancer who received NAC. pCR was defined as no invasive residual tumor in the breast or axilla.ResultsMedian follow-up was 55 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that HR status (OR, 0.37; p < 0.001) was one of the independent predictors of pCR. Five-year recurrence-free survival was higher in HR-negative patients with pCR (93%) than in those without pCR (68%), and pCR was independently prognostic (hazard ratio, 0.32; p = 0.005). However, 5-year recurrence-free survival was not different between HR-positive patients with pCR (94%) and those without pCR (84%), and pCR was not significantly prognostic (hazard ratio, 0.53; p = 0.39). In addition, 5-year overall survivals were high and similar (97% in pCR, 94% in non-pCR). Among 204 patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pCR was not significantly prognostic in the HR-positive group (hazard ratio, 0.63; p = 0.56).ConclusionOur study suggested that the HER2-positive HR-positive patients had a good prognosis despite the lower achievement rate of pCR, whose prognostic impact was smaller than that in the HER2-positive HR-negative patients. The treatment strategy for HER2-positive breast cancer can be stratified by HR status.     

Adjuvant treatment of premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: Design of the TEXT and SOFT trials

ObjectivesIn 2003 the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) initiated the TEXT and SOFT randomized phase III trials to answer two questions concerning adjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: 1-What is the role of aromatase inhibitors (AI) for women treated with ovarian function suppression (OFS)? 2-What is the role of OFS for women who remain premenopausal and are treated with tamoxifen?MethodsTEXT randomized patients to receive exemestane or tamoxifen with OFS. SOFT randomized patients to receive exemestane with OFS, tamoxifen with OFS, or tamoxifen alone. Treatment was for 5 years from randomization.ResultsTEXT and SOFT successfully met their enrollment goals in 2011. The 5738 enrolled women had lower-risk disease and lower observed disease-free survival (DFS) event rates than anticipated. Consequently, 7 and 13 additional years of follow-up for TEXT and SOFT, respectively, were required to reach the targeted DFS events (median follow-up about 10.5 and 15 years). To provide timely answers, protocol amendments in 2011 specified analyses based on chronological time and median follow-up. To assess the AI question, exemestane + OFS versus tamoxifen + OFS, a combined analysis of TEXT and SOFT became the primary analysis (n = 4717). The OFS question became the primary analysis from SOFT, assessing the unique comparison of tamoxifen + OFS versus tamoxifen alone (n = 2045). The first reports are anticipated in mid- and late-2014.ConclusionsWe present the original designs of TEXT and SOFT and adaptations to ensure timely answers to two questions concerning optimal adjuvant endocrine treatment for premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer.Trial RegistrationTEXT: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066703SOFT: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066690     

Locoregional therapy in de novo metastatic breast cancer: Systemic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundLocoregional therapy (LRT) in de novo metastatic disease is controversial with inconsistent results from randomized control trials (RCTs).MethodsRCTs comparing LRT and systemic therapy to standard therapy alone in de novo metastatic breast cancer were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and pooled in a meta-analysis using generic inverse variance. Overall survival (OS) and time to locoregional progression data were extracted for the intention to treat (ITT) population. Data on OS for pre-specified subgroups defined by tumor subtype and by site of metastases were also extracted.ResultsAnalyses included 4 trials comprising 970 patients. LRT included standard surgery to the primary breast tumor in all studies, and adjuvant radiation per standard of care was required in 3 studies. Compared to standard treatment, LRT was not associated with improved OS in the ITT population (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72–1.29, p = 0.81). However, LRT was associated with improved time to locoregional progression (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14–0.95, p = 0.04). LRT was not associated with improved OS in any tumor subtypes, including hormone receptor positive (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65–1.43), triple negative (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.50–3.91) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive disease (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68–1.28). Additionally, LRT did not improve OS in bone only disease (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.58–1.62) and in visceral disease (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.77–1.35). Our critical appraisal has identified some methodological problems in the design and conduct of the studies included that could affect the meta-analysis result.ConclusionsLRT in de novo metastatic breast cancer is not associated with improved OS. Results are consistent among different breast cancer subgroups. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution in view of the limitations identified in meta-analysis.     

The impact of tamoxifen brand switch on side effects and patient compliance in hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients

BackgroundIn 2006 Nolvadex was discontinued and replaced by a variety of alternative generic tamoxifen brands for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Anecdotally, patients are switching brands and taking alternative medications to reduce treatment related symptoms. Nevertheless, more severe side effects may equate to better relapse prevention. This study evaluates generic tamoxifen adherence and its correlation with side effects and brand switch.MethodsConsecutive disease free ER positive patients (stage I–III) were invited to respond to a questionnaire. 165 of 327 questionnaires were returned (50% response). Pearson's Chi Square test was used for data analysis.Results63 patients (38%) reported a switch between generic tamoxifen. 59% of all patients experienced side effects associated with tamoxifen treatment of which 53% were severe. Patients experiencing differential symptoms dependent on tamoxifen brand reported more severe side effects (p = 0.02). Non-prescribed supplements were taken by 42% of all patients with no significant improvement in climacteric symptoms (p = 0.05). The concomitant use of SSRIs appeared to have no effect on symptoms. A significant number of patients considered discontinuing tamoxifen because of the side effects (p = 0.001), yet this did not translate into discontinuation or non-adherence (p = 0.8 and 0.08 respectively).ConclusionSevere tamoxifen side effects are commonly experienced by breast cancer patients and can be significantly altered by change in tamoxifen brand.Most patients will continue to take tamoxifen, despite side effects to avoid cancer relapse. Supplementation and antidepressants did not improve tamoxifen related side effects in our cohort.     

Predictive and prognostic values of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis

BackgroundThis meta-analysis assessed the predictive and prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) treated breast cancer and an optimal threshold for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR).MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases was conducted to identify eligible studies published before April 2022. Either a fixed or random effects model was applied to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) for prognosis and predictive values of TILs in breast cancer patients treated with NACT. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020221521).ResultsA total of 29 published studies were eligible. Increased levels of TILs predicted response to NACT in HER2 positive breast cancer (OR = 2.54 95%CI, 1.50–4.29) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (OR = 3.67, 95%CI, 1.93–6.97), but not for hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer (OR = 1.68, 95 %CI, 0.67–4.25). A threshold of 20% of H & E-stained TILs was associated with prediction of pCR in both HER2 positive breast cancer (P = 0.035) and TNBC (P = 0.001). Moreover, increased levels of TILs (either iTILs or sTILs) were associated with survival benefit in HER2-positive breast cancer and TNBC. However, an increased level of TILs was not a prognostic factor for survival in HR positive breast cancer (pooled HR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.03–14.1, P = 0.78).ConclusionsIncreased levels of TILs were associated with increased rates of response to NACT and improved prognosis for the molecular subtypes of TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer, but not for patients with HR positive breast cancer. A threshold of 20% TILs was the most powerful outcome prognosticator of pCR.     

The association between endocrine therapy use and osteoporotic fracture among post-menopausal women treated for early-stage breast cancer in Ontario,Canada

BackgroundThe use of endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer, particularly aromatase inhibitor therapy has been associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture in clinical trials. We sought to validate this observation in real-world practice.MethodsWe used health administrative data collected from post-menopausal women (aged ≥66 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer and started on adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2005 to 2012. Patients were classified by use of either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen and followed until 2017 for a new diagnosis of an osteoporotic fracture. A multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was adjusting for age, medical co-morbidities, medication use and duration of endocrine therapy.ResultsWe identified 12,077 patients of whom 73% were treated with an aromatase inhibitor as compared to 27% with tamoxifen. Our multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture between patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor when compared with tamoxifen [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96–1.23, p-value = 0.18]. The 5-year rate of osteoporotic fracture for patients treated with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen was 7.5% and 6.9%, respectively. A completed sensitivity analysis did observe a decreased risk of fracture associated with tamoxifen usage over time.ConclusionWe could not detect a significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture among patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor versus tamoxifen. Nonetheless, the risk with tamoxifen was numerically lower and significantly decreased when accounting for total duration of endocrine therapy.     

Should all postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receive initial therapy with aromatase inhibitors?

BackgroundIn the past few years aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have shown superior efficacy to the previous standard adjuvant endocrine therapy, tamoxifen, and are now recommended as part of current adjuvant endocrine therapy. A range of treatment strategies have been explored.Materials and methodsWe assess the role of initial AI therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and consider the relative value of initial therapy with an AI compared with switch or extended (>5-yr) adjuvant therapy.ResultsBoth initial AI therapy and switching/sequential tamoxifen followed by an AI are associated with longer disease- and relapse-free survival versus 5 years of tamoxifen alone. Trials comparing initial therapy with the sequence of tamoxifen followed by an AI have not demonstrated any major efficacy differences between the treatment strategies. Several analyses have been conducted to identify prognostic or predictive markers of treatment benefit to enable selection of the most appropriate adjuvant therapy.ConclusionsInitial and switching/sequential regimens are equally appropriate adjuvant treatment options for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The exact tumour biology which allows for initial AI therapy has not yet been determined with certainty.     

A high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio are associated with a worse outcome in inflammatory breast cancer

IntroductionInflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an uncommon, but aggressive form of breast cancer that accounts for a disproportionally high fraction of breast cancer related mortality. The aim of this study was to explore the peripheral immune response and the prognostic value of blood-based biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), in a large IBC cohort.Patients & methodsWe retrospectively identified 127 IBC patients and collected lab results from in-hospital medical records. The differential count of leukocytes was determined at the moment of diagnosis, before any therapeutic intervention. A cohort of early stage (n = 108), locally advanced (n = 74) and metastatic breast cancer patients (n = 41) served as a control population.ResultsThe NLR was significantly higher in IBC compared to an early stage breast cancer cohort, but no difference between IBC patients and locally advanced breast cancer patients was noted. In the metastatic setting, there was also no significant difference between IBC and nIBC. However, a high NLR (>4.0) remained a significant predictor of worse outcome in IBC patients (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24–1.00; P = .05) and a lower platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (≤210) correlated with a better disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28–0.93; P = .03).ConclusionPatients with a high NLR (>4.0) have a worse overall prognosis in IBC, while the PLR correlated with relapse free survival (RFS). Since NLR and PLR were not specifically associated with IBC disease, they can be seen as markers of more extensive disease.     

Association between common risk factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer patients

BackgroundBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and characterized its by molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Gene expression profiling studies have classified breast cancers into five subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER-2 overexpressing, basal-like, and normal breast-like. Although clinical differences between subtypes have been well described in the literature, etiologic heterogeneity have not been fully studied. The aim of this study was to assess the associations between several hormonal and nonhormonal risk factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.MethodsThis cross-sectional study consisted of 1884 invasive breast cancer cases. Variables studied included family history, age at first full-term pregnancy, number of children, duration of lactation, menstruation history, menopausal status, blood type, smoking, obesity, oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy and in vitro fertilization. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsThousand two-hundred and forty nine patients had luminal A, 234 had luminal B, 169 had HER-2 overexpressing and 232 had triple negative breast cancer. The age of ≥40 years was found to be a risk factor for luminal A (OR 1.41 95% CI 1.15–1.74; p = 0.001) and HER-2 overexpressing subtype (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01–2.25; p = 0.04). Women who were nulliparous (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.13; p = 0.03) or who had their first full-term pregnancy at age 30 years or older (OR 1.25 95% CI 0.83–1.88; p = 0.04) were at increased risk of luminal breast cancer, whereas women with more than two children had a decreased risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.97; p = 0.03). Breast-feeding was also a protective factor for luminal subtype (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–1.04; p = 0.04) when compared to non-luminal breast cancer. We found increased risks for postmenopausal women with HER-2 overexpressing (OR 2.20, 95% CI 0.93–5.17; p = 0.04) and luminal A (OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.93–3.90, p = 0.02) breast cancers, who used hormone replacement therapy for 5 years or more. Overweight and obesity significantly increased the risk of triple negative subtype (OR 1.89 95% CI 1.06–3.37; p = 0.04 and OR 1.90 95% CI 1.00–3.61; p = 0.03), on the contrary, decreased the risk of luminal breast cancer (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.43–0.95; p = 0.02 and OR 0.50 95% CI 0.32–0.76; p = 0.002, respectively) in premenopausal women. There were no significant differences between risk of breast cancer subtypes and early menarche, late menopause, family history, postmenopausal obesity, oral contraseptive use, smoking, in vitro fertilization, blood groups and use of hands.ConclusionsReproductive and hormonal characteristics (breastfeeding, parity, age at first full-term birth, hormone replacement therapy) were associated with luminal subtype, compared to non-luminal breast cancer, as consistent with previous studies. Obesity and overweight increased the risk of triple negative subtype, particularly in premenopausal women. Older age and use of hormone replacement therapy were related to the risk of HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer. Our data suggest a significant heterogeneity in association of traditional breast cancer risk factors and tumor subtypes.     

Aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: Putting safety issues into perspective

Tamoxifen has been the gold standard adjuvant therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer for many years. Tamoxifen treatment is limited to 5 years because of the development of de novo and acquired resistance, and an ongoing risk of adverse events, including endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events, and gynecological symptoms with long-term use. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, are displacing tamoxifen as the first-choice therapy for HR+ early breast cancer, and are now recommended as the preferred therapy by national and international guidelines. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated that the AIs are more effective than tamoxifen in preventing disease recurrence when used in substitution and sequential strategies in the early adjuvant setting, and letrozole has been shown to be more effective than placebo in the extended adjuvant setting (after 5 years of tamoxifen therapy). Trial safety data show that the overall tolerability of AIs is similar to that of tamoxifen, with adverse events being predictably characteristic of estrogen deprivation; however, some important differences in adverse event profiles between tamoxifen and the AIs have been demonstrated. In addition to antiestrogenic effects, tamoxifen acts as an estrogen agonist in some tissues, which can lead to serious side effects not associated with the AIs, which prevent estrogen biosynthesis. A lower incidence of gynecological and thromboembolic events is observed in patients taking AIs, and fewer cases of endometrial cancer are seen compared with tamoxifen. Adverse events that are more frequent with adjuvant AI therapy compared with tamoxifen include arthralgia and myalgia, bone loss, and effects on the cardiovascular system and blood lipids. The effects of AIs on bone are predictable and may be easily managed, where necessary, with bisphosphonates. Studies examining the effects of AIs on the cardiovascular system and lipid profiles, including in the extended adjuvant setting, suggest that these adverse events may be due to the absence of a protective effect of tamoxifen rather than true AI toxicity. Further studies are required to determine the long-term safety of AI therapy in postmenopausal women with HR+ early breast cancer.