Post-thoracotomy pain relief: Thoracic paravertebral block compared with systemic opioids

BackgroundWe evaluated the safety and efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block as a method of pain relief after thoracotomy in comparison with systemic opioids.Study designRandomized controlled trial.MethodsWe scheduled 40 patients divided into two groups to receive either 20 ml bupivacaine (0.5%) incremental injections for intra and postoperative analgesia via a catheter inserted in the thoracic paravertebral space. The other 20 patients received systemic morphine for postoperative analgesia. We recorded postoperative Visual Analog Scale pain score, total morphine consumption, time to first analgesic request, changes in pulmonary functions and side effects.ResultsVisual analogue scale (VAS) at rest was lower in the paravertebral group at all measurement points except at 16, 20 and 24 h postoperatively. Pain on coughing showed significant difference (P value < 0.05) at 8 and 16 h but not at 24 h. Post-operative consumption of morphine was 36 (22–42) mg in the control group versus 9 (2–22) mg in the paravertebral block group (PVB) (P value = 0.003). Total bupivacaine dose used in the PVB group in the first 24 h was 300–420 mg. For time to first analgesic request it was significantly longer in the morphine group than the paravertebral block group. VAS at first analgesic request was not statistically different between the two groups.There was no significant difference between the two groups as regards to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) preoperatively, after 12 h or 24 h.There was a significant reduction in the incidence of side effects in the TPVB group compared to morphine group concerning vomiting and pruritus.no local anesthetic toxicity was reported.ConclusionWe conclude that thoracic PVB provides effective post thoracotomy analgesia supported by lower VAS pain scores at rest and on coughing compared to intravenous morphine with significant less incidence of side effects.     

Impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative quality of recovery in video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective,randomized, controlled trial

Study objectiveRegional anesthesia improves postoperative analgesia and enhances the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery. We examine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on QoR after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).DesignProspective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.SettingSingle institution, tertiary university hospital.PatientsAdult patients who scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study.InterventionsWe randomly allocated patients to receive preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB with 25 ml of either 0.5% ropivacaine (ESPB group) or normal saline (Control group).MeasurementsThe primary outcome was QoR as measured by the 40-item QoR questionnaire (QoR-40) score at postoperative day 1. Secondary results were post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, acute postoperative pain, cumulative opioid consumption, the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction.Main resultsThe global QoR-40 score at postoperative day 1 (median, interquartile range) was significantly higher in the ESPB group (174, 170 to 177) than the control group (161.5, 160 to 165), estimated median difference 11 (95% CI 9 to 13, P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, single-injection of ESPB reduced PACU discharge time, acute postoperative pain, and cumulative opioid consumption. Correspondingly, the median patient satisfaction scores were higher in the ESPB group than the control group (9 versus 7, P < 0.001).ConclusionPreoperative single-injection thoracic ESPB with ropivacaine improves QoR, postoperative analgesia, and patient satisfaction after VATS.     

Pectoserratus plane block versus erector spinae plane block for postoperative opioid consumption and acute and chronic pain after breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveBreast cancer is quite common in women, and surgery is the most effective treatment in most cases. This study compared the effects of ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and pectoserratus plane block (PSPB) on the postoperative opioid consumption and acute and chronic pain in patients after breast cancer surgery.DesignProspective, randomized, single-blind.SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsThis study included 90 patients (ASA I-II) who underwent segmental mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy at the hospital of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun.InterventionsThe patients were divided into the ESPB group, PSPB group, and control group. Intraoperatively, all patients were administered intravenous tenoxicam (20 mg) and paracetamol (1 g) as part of multimodal analgesia. Intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia was administered in all groups postoperatively.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the total morphine consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores of the arm at rest and at abduction in the first 24 h and at 3 months postoperatively, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, number of patients requesting rescue analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, time to the first request for analgesia via patient-controlled analgesia.Main resultsPostoperative 24-h morphine consumption, visual analog scale scores at rest and at abduction, and intraoperative remifentanil consumption were lower in the ESPB and PSPB groups than in the control group. Time to the first request for analgesia via patient controlled analgesia was longer in the ESPB and PSPB groups than in the control group. In the PSPB group, none of the patients needed rescue analgesia.ConclusionsUS-guided ESPB and PSPB performed in patients who underwent breast cancer surgery showed similar and modest analgesic effects on the postoperative opioid consumption and acute and chronic pain scores.     

Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveErector spinae plane (ESP) block is a novel regional anesthesia technique and gaining importance for postoperative pain management. Since it was first described, the clinicians wonder if this new simple technique can replace paravertebral block (PVB). We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of ESP block and PVB with a control group in breast surgeries.DesignRandomized controlled trial.SettingOperating room.PatientsSeventy-five ASA I–II patients aged 25–65, who were scheduled to go under elective unilateral breast surgery for breast cancer were included to the study.InterventionsPatients were randomized into three groups as ESP, PVB, and Control group. Ultrasound (US) guided ESP block and PVB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine was done preoperatively to the patients according to their groups.MeasurementsAll patients were provided with iv patient-controlled analgesia device for postoperative analgesia. Morphine consumptions and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for pain were recorded at 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively.Main resultsThere was a statistically significant difference between ESP and Control groups (p < 0,001) and between PVB and Control groups (p < 0,001), while there was no difference between ESP and PVB groups (p > 0,05) for 24-hour morphine consumptions. There was a significant difference between PVB and Control groups for NRS at postoperative 1st and 6th hour (p = 0.018 and p = 0.027 respectively).ConclusionsThis study has shown that US guided ESP block and PVB provided adequate analgesia in patients undergoing breast surgery and have an opioid sparing effect by reducing morphine consumption.Clinical Trials Registry: NCT03480958.     

The effect of preoperative erector spinae plane vs. paravertebral blocks on patient-controlled oxycodone consumption after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective randomized,blinded, non-inferiority study

Study objectiveTo investigate the effective analgesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery.DesignIn this prospective non-inferiority study, we evaluated the postoperative analgesic effect of preoperative ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane blocks (ESPB) on T4 and T6 levels in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery in comparison with paravertebral block (PVB) at the same intervertebral spaces.SettingA university hospital.Patients66 patients scheduled to undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery under general anesthesia were included.InterventionsPatients were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided ESP blocks on T4 and T6 levels (Group ESPB, n = 33) or PVB (Group PVB, n = 33) with 30 mL 0.4% ropivacaine 30 min before anesthesia induction. A continuous flurbiprofen (8 mg/h) was infused postoperatively through a single-use infusion device and intravenous oxycodone supplied as analgesic rescue if needed, with bolus of oxycodone (1 mg) and lockout time being 10 min.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the postoperative oxycodone consumption at 48 h.Main resultsIntraoperative use of sufentanil and remifentanil were comparable between these two groups. Pain scores, oxycodone rescue and Quality of Recovery (QoR) 15 on postoperative day 1 and 2 were equivalent between these two groups. Postoperative oxycodone consumption was 7.9 ± 8.7 boluses in ESPB group and 6.9 ± 6.3 boluses in PVB group at 48 h. The cumulative 48 h difference i.e. Oxycodone boluses_{with ESPB} minus Oxycodone boluses_{with PVB} was 2 (95% CI -1, 5.6). The lower limit of the 95% CI for this difference was −1, which was within the predefined non-inferiority margin of −10 (Δ).ConclusionsUltrasound-guided ESPB applied before video assisted thoracic surgery was non-inferior in analgesic effect compared with PVB in terms of pain score, analgesic rescue consumption and quality of recovery.Brief summary statementPreoperative Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB), when in combination with round-the-clock NSAIDs, offered equivalent analgesia and quality of recovery after video assisted thoracic lung surgery compared with paravertebral blocks. Patients who received ESP blocks had similar consumption of oxycodone and length of hospital stay.     

Preoperative multiple-injection thoracic paravertebral blocks reduce postoperative pain and analgesic requirements after video-assisted thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE: The hypothesis was tested that preoperative multiple-injection thoracic paravertebral blocks reduce opioid requirements and promote early ambulation after video-assisted thoracic surgery procedures. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study. SETTING: Single-university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty consenting patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive preoperative multiple-injection thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVB group, n = 25) or preoperative multiple subcutaneous saline injections at the same site as in the PVB group (control group, n = 25). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was lower in the PVB group (p < 0.01). The time to first analgesic requirement was longer, and pain score at this time was lower in the PVB group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Postoperative pain scores both at rest and coughing were lower during the first 4 hours in the PVB group than those in the control group (p < 0.01 for 0 hours and p < 0.05 for 1, 2, and 4 hours). Cumulative morphine consumption was significantly less in the PVB group at all time points (p < 0.05 for 12 hours and p < 0.01 for all other time points), but there were no significant differences in sedation scores between the 2 groups. There were no complications because of the blocks. Patient satisfaction with the analgesia was significantly greater (p < 0.05), and first mobilization and hospital discharge were quicker (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) in the PVB group. CONCLUSION: Perioperative multiple-injection thoracic paravertebral blocks with bupivacaine containing epinephrine provided effective pain relief and a significant reduction in opioid requirements. This approach may also contribute to earlier postoperative ambulation after video-assisted thoracic surgery.     

Bilateral erector spinae plane blocks in children undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized,controlled study

Study objectiveWe aimed to test the hypothesis that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) provides efficient analgesia and reduces postoperative morphine consumption in children undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy.DesignA prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study.SettingA tertiary university hospital, operating room and intensive care unit.PatientsForty children aged 2–10 years, who underwent cardiac surgery with median sternotomy. The patients were randomly divided into the block group (Group B) and the control group (Group C).InterventionsGroup B (n = 20) were treated with ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB at the level of the T4-T5 transverse process, whereas no block was administered in Group C (n = 20). In all children, intravenous morphine at 0.05 mg/kg was used whenever the modified objective pain score (MOPS) ≥4 for postoperative analgesia.MeasurementsThe MOPS and Ramsay sedation score (RSS) were assessed at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h postoperatively. Total morphine consumption at 24 h, extubation time and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was also evaluated and recorded.Main resultsBilateral ESPB significantly decreased the consumption of morphine in the first 24 h, postoperatively. During the postoperative 24-h follow-up, 11 children in Group C requested morphine and the cumulative dose of morphine was 0.83 ± 0.91 mg, while 4 children in Group B requested morphine and the cumulative dose of morphine was 0.26 ± 0.59 mg (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference between Groups B and C in terms of MOPS and RSS values, extubation time or length of ICU stay.ConclusionUltrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with bupivacaine provides efficient postoperative analgesia and reduces postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h in children undergoing cardiac surgery.     

Feasibility of combined paravertebral block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain control after minimally invasive esophagectomy

ObjectivesSubcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and paravertebral block (PVB) offer postoperative analgesia for laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery, respectively. We investigated the early postoperative analgesic effects of PVB in combination with subcostal TAP block in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer.MethodsSeventeen patients undergoing MIE without nerve block for postoperative analgesia and 16 patients undergoing MIE with PVB and subcostal TAP block for postoperative analgesia were enrolled for the study. The surgeon performed PVB with bupivacaine at T4, T6, and T8 levels under video-assisted thoracoscopy at the end of the thoracoscopic stage. The anesthesiologist responsible for the anesthesia performed ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal TAP with bupivacaine at the end of the surgery. Postoperative morphine consumption, pain severity, vital capacity, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and complication rate were compared between groups.ResultsThe group receiving nerve blocks consumed less morphine on postoperative Day 0 (p = 0.016), experienced lower levels of pain at postoperative 0 hour (p = 0.005) and 2 hours (p = 0.049), and had a shorter ICU stay (p = 0.02). No between-group differences in postoperative vital capacity and respiratory complications were observed.ConclusionPVB in combination with subcostal TAP block could reduce morphine consumption and pain severity in the early postoperative period but did not offer other clinical benefits in MIE.     

Posteromedial quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominal plane block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveOur hypothesis was that a pre-operative posteromedial quadratus lumborum (QL) block would reduce postoperative morphine consumption and provide superior analgesia in the setting of multimodal analgesia compared with a lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.DesignA randomized controlled study.SettingA single tertiary hospital. March to August 2018.Patients80 ASA I–II colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection were enrolled. 77 patients (group QL 38, group TAP 39) were included in the analysis.InterventionPre-operatively, patients were randomized to receive either a QL or TAP block (0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml bilaterally for each group).MeasurementsThe primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, clinical recovery, and side-effect profiles of the blocks.Main resultsFor the primary outcome measure, morphine consumption 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the QL group than in the TAP group (estimated median difference −8 mg, adjusted 95% confidential interval −12 to −6 mg, P < 0.001). The pain visual analogue scores at rest and during movement were found to be statistically significantly lower in the QL group than in the TAP group 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.006). The QL group reported higher overall satisfaction scores regarding postoperative analgesia than the TAP group (P = 0.014). One patient in the QL group experienced moderate back pain close to the needle entry site postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting, bowel recovery or length of hospital stay between the groups.ConclusionsThe pre-operative bilateral, ultrasound-guided posteromedial QL block reduces morphine consumption and improves analgesia in the setting of multimodal analgesia compared with the lateral TAP block after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.     

Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study

Objective:This study aimed to compare the effect of the ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain scores, opioid requirement, patient satisfaction, and the length of hospital stay with standard analgesia methods following scoliosis surgery.Methods:Twenty-seven patients (17 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.59 ± 3.24 years) who underwent scoliosis surgery with preoperative bilateral bilevel US-guided ESPB were the sample group, and the remaining 30 patients (20 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.57 ± 2.75 years) without ESPB were the control group. Bilateral bilevel injection ESPB was performed at two levels (T4 and T10). Postoperative pain scores, morphine consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were recorded. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to score postoperative pain.Results:VAS at rest and when mobile, as well as postoperative cumulative morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24 h, was significantly lower in the ESPB group. Thirteen patients in the control group but no in the ESPB group required rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Both the time to the requirement of the initial dose of PCA and patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the ESPB group (P < 0.001 for both).Conclusion:Given the need for improved recovery of the patients, ESPB seems to be an essential analgesic technique that may reduce both opioid consumption and the severity of the pain, thus increasing the satisfaction of the patients and decreasing the length of hospital stay.Level of Evidence:Level IV, Therapeutic Study     

Continuous Paravertebral Analgesia versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia after Video- Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Whether continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and continuous paravertebral block (PVB) have similar analgesic effects in patients undergoing video- assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy was compared in this study.Methods: In all, 86 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were enrolled in the prospective, randomized clinical trial. Group E received TEA. Group P received PVB. The primary endpoint was postoperative 24-hour visual rating scale (VAS) on coughing. Side effects and postoperative complications were also analyzed.Results: Pain scores at rest or on coughing at 24 and 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower in group E than in group P (P <0.05). At 24 h postoperatively, more patients in group E suffered from vomiting (32.6% vs 11.6%, P = 0.019), dizziness (55.8% vs 12.9%, P = 0.009), pruritus (27.9% vs 2.3%, P = 0.002), and hypotension (32.6% vs 4.7%, P = 0.002) than those in group P. Patients in group E were more satisfied (P = 0.047). Four patients in group P and two patients in group E suffered from pulmonary complications (P >0.05). The length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays were not significantly different.Conclusions: Though TEA has more adverse events than PVB, it may be superior to PVB in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.     

Comparison of the analgesic effect between continuous wound infiltration and single-injection transversus abdominis plane block after gynecologic laparotomy

Purpose

Both single-injection transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and continuous wound infiltration (CWI) provide postoperative analgesia, but no study has compared the two regional techniques. We tested the hypothesis that CWI is more effective for controlling postoperative pain compared with single-injection TAP block after laparotomy.

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomized study of patients undergoing gynecologic laparotomy with midline incision through the umbilicus under general anesthesia. The patients were allocated to receive either single-injection TAP block (TAP group) or CWI (CWI group) for postoperative analgesia. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and intravenous flurbiprofen twice daily after surgery. Postoperative pain at rest and on coughing, postoperative morphine consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus and urinary retention, ambulation, and satisfaction score were recorded. Patients were assessed at 3 h after surgery and twice daily on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2.

Results

Data of 54 patients were analyzed. Compared to the TAP group (n = 27), pain score on coughing was significantly lower in the CWI group (n = 27) on POD1 and POD2 (P < 0.05). Pain score on coughing at 3 h after surgery, pain score at rest at all assessed time points, morphine consumption, incidence of PONV, pruritus and urinary retention, ambulation, and satisfaction score were not different between the two groups.

Conclusion

CWI reduced pain on coughing after the day of surgery compared with single-injection TAP block when performed as part of multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing gynecologic laparotomy.

     

Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objectiveErector spinae plane block (ESPB) has gained popularity for perioperative analgesia in various surgeries. However, its efficacy in lumbar surgery remains unclear. This review aimed to determine whether ESPB could improve analgesic efficacy in lumbar spine surgery.DesignA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.SettingPerioperative setting.PatientsPatients undergoing lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia.InterventionsWe searched the databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science etc. for published eligible controlled trials comparing ESPB with control (no block/sham block) in lumbar spine surgery.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery.Main resultsTwelve studies comprising 665 participants were included. Compared to the control, ESPB reduced the opioid (morphine milligram equivalents) consumption significantly 24 h after surgery [mean difference (MD) = −14.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), −21.03 to −8.07; P < 0.0001] and lowered the pain scores at various time points (at rest or during movement) for 48 h after surgery. ESPB increased the patient satisfaction score (0−10) (MD = 2.38; 95% CI, 2.10 to 2.66; P < 0.0001), decreased the postoperative nausea and vomiting [risk ratio (RR) = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.67; P = 0.001], and minimized the length of hospital stay (MD = −1.24 days; 95% CI, −2.31 to −0.18; P = 0.02). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed additional reduction in opioid consumption by the block approach at the vertebral level of incision/operation than that at the fixed thoracic/lumbar level. However, considerable heterogeneity and low-grade quality of evidence were observed.ConclusionsESPB provided effective postoperative analgesia resulting in better patient satisfaction and recovery with decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lumbar surgery compared to the control. However, the low-grade quality of evidence compromised the findings, therefore further high-quality of evidence is required.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021233362.     

Effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain after open lumbar spinal surgery: a double-blind,randomized controlled trial

Purpose

The peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) are an important part of the multimodal analgesia for reducing postoperative pain, opioids consumption and its side effects. A new PNB, Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), has been revealed postoperative analgesic effect in various surgical procedures such as breast, thoracic and abdominal surgery, with the limitation of the studies for spine surgery. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after open lumbar spinal surgery.

Methods

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty-two patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. The ESPB group (n = 31) received ultrasound (US)-guided bilateral ESPB using 20 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine with adrenaline 5 mcg/ml per side. The control group (n = 31) received no intervention. The same postoperative analgesia regimen was applied by oral acetaminophen 10–15 mg/kg every 6 h, naproxen 250 mg twice daily, and intravenous (IV) morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. The postoperative morphine consumption, numerical pain score (NRS) and the side effects were recorded.

Results

The bilateral ESPB group reduced the 24 h-morphine consumption by 42.9% (P < 0.001), decreased overall pain score at rest by 1.4 points (P = 0.02), and decreased overall pain score on movement by 2.2 points (P < 0.001). No severe complications related to the block technique or morphine used occurred.

Conclusion

The US-guided bilateral ESPB demonstrated the effectiveness for postoperative analgesia management after open lumbar spinal surgery regarding reduced opioid consumption and pain score without any serious complications.

     

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia: Postoperative pain management after Nuss repair for pectus excavatum

Aim of the StudyPostoperative pain management is a significant challenge in patients undergoing Nuss repair for pectus excavatum chest wall deformity. Therapeutic anesthetic options primarily include patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and cryoanalgesia. However, TEA is limited to inpatient use and both TEA and cryoanalgesia can result in neurologic injury. The novel technique of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane regional analgesia has been used recently in our patients undergoing the Nuss repair and has shown impressive pain relief, but without the potential complications of other modalities. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) postoperative pain management outcomes were studied as compared to TEA.MethodsThirty consecutive patients with severe pectus excavatum undergoing Nuss repair and placement of ultrasound-guided ESPB were each paired to a historical cohort control patient with TEA postoperative pain management. The cohort patient match was defined by age (± 2 years), gender, and CT pectus index (± 15%). Study variables included hospital length of stay (LOS), pain scores, and pain medication usage.ResultsPain scores as measured by area under the curve per hour (Day 1: 2.72 (SD = 1.37) vs. 3.90 (SD = 1.81), P = 0.006; Day 2: 2.83 (SD = 1.32) vs. 3.97 (SD = 1.82), P = 0.007) and oral morphine equivalent (OME) pain medication usage (Day 1: 11.9 (SD = 4.9) vs 56.0 (SD = 32.2), P < 0.001; Day 2: 14.7 (SD = 7.1) vs. 38.0 (SD = 21.7), P < 0.001) were higher for the first two postoperative days in the ESPB group. However, mean hospital LOS was nearly one day shorter for ESPB patients (3.78 (SD = 0.82) vs. 2.90 (SD = 0.87), P < 0.001) who were discharged home with the catheter in place until removal, typically at 5–7 days postoperatively.ConclusionUltrasound-guided ESPB is thus a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to TEA in postoperative pain management after Nuss repair and results in decreased hospital stay.Level of evidenceIII     

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveSpinal fusion surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain. We examined whether bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block could alleviate postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.DesignBlinded, randomized, controlled study.SettingTertiary university hospital, operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward.PatientsSixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II scheduled for lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomized into the erector spinae plane block group (ESPB group) and the control group in a 1:1 ratio.InterventionsPre-operative ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block was performed in the ESPB group, while sham subcutaneous infiltration was performed in the control group.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was pain intensity at rest within 12 h postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included NRS pain scores at rest and on movement, postoperative opioid consumption and proportions of patients requiring opioid during the first 48 h after surgery.Main resultsThe ESPB group (n = 30) showed significantly lower pain scores at rest at 4 h after surgery (estimated mean difference − 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.4 to −0.8, p < 0.001), at 8 h (−1.3, 95% CI -1.9 to −0.6, p < 0.001), and at 12 h (−0.7, 95% CI -1.3 to −0.1, p = 0.023). The two groups showed similar pain scores at rest at 24 h after surgery (estimated mean difference − 0.2, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.5) and 48 h (−0.3, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.2). The ESPB group also showed significantly lower pain score on movement at 4 h after surgery (−1.5, 95% CI -2.5 to −0.6). The ESPB group showed a significantly smaller proportion of patients requiring sufentanil within 12 h after surgery (p = 0.020), and the group consumed significantly less sufentanil during that period (p = 0.042).ConclusionsBilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improves postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.     

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objectiveThe erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newly defined regional anesthesia technique first introduced in 2016. The aim of this study is to determine its analgesic efficacy compared with non-block care and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB).DesignWe systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science citation index, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov register searched up to March 2020. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared an ESPB to non-block care or TPVB for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery patients. Primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane methodology.Results14 RCTs that comprised 1018 patients were included. Seven trials involved thoracic surgery patients and seven included breast surgery patients. Meta-analysis revealed that ESPB significantly reduced 24-hour opioid consumption compared with the non-block groups (−10.5 mg; 95% CI: −16.49 to −3.81; p = 0.002; I² = 99%). Similarly, the finding was consistent in subgroup analysis between the breast surgery (−7.75 mg; 95%CI −13.98 to −1.51; p = 0.01; I² = 97%) and thoracic surgery (−14.81 mg; 95%CI −21.18 to −8.44; p < 0.001; I² = 96%) subgroups. The ESPB significantly reduced pain scores at rest or movement at various time points postoperatively compared with non-block group, and reduced the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (OR 0.48; 95%CI 0.27 to 0.86; p = 0.01; I² = 0%). In contrast, there were no significative differences reported in any of the outcomes for ESPB versus TPVB strata.ConclusionsESPB improved analgesic efficacy in breast and thoracic surgery patients compared with non-block care. Furthermore, current literature supported the ESPB offered comparable analgesic efficacy to a TPVB.     

Pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block vs thoracic paravertebral block for unilateral radical mastectomy with axillary evacuation

Study ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block in comparison with thoracic paravertebral block for postmastectomy pain.DesignA prospective randomized controlled study.SettingTertiary center, university hospital.PatientsSixty-four adult women, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I, II, and III, scheduled for unilateral modified radical mastectomy with axillary evacuation.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block, PS group (n = 32), or thoracic paravertebral block, PV group (n = 32).MeasurementsTwenty-four-hour morphine consumption and the time to rescue analgesic were recorded. The pain intensity evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) score at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively was also recorded.Main ResultsThe median (interquartile range) postoperative 24-hour morphine consumption was significantly increased in PS group in comparison to PV group (PS vs PV), 20 mg (16-23 mg) vs 12 mg (10-14 mg) (P < .001). The median postoperative time to first analgesic request was significantly shorter in PS group compared to PV group (PS, 6 hours [5-7 hours], vs PV, 11 hours [9-13 hours]) (P < .001). The intensity of pain was low in both groups in VAS 0, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively. However, there was significant reduction in VAS in PV group compared to PS group at 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively.ConclusionsPectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block was safe and easy to perform and decreased intensity of postmastectomy pain, but it was inferior to thoracic paravertebral block.     

Benefits and risks of intermittent bolus erector spinae plane block through a catheter for patients after cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy: A propensity score matched retrospective cohort study

Study objectiveA lateral mini-thoracotomy approach to cardiac surgery causes severe and complicated postoperative pain compared to the sternotomy approach. In this study we assessed the benefits and risks of intermittent bolus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) via a catheter for patients who underwent cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy.DesignA propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.SettingUniversity hospital.Patients452 consecutive patients that underwent cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy from 2018 to 2020.InterventionsPatients who received intermittent bolus ESPB through a catheter for 3 days (ESPB group, n = 93) were compared with patients who did not receive any regional anesthesia (Control group, n = 174) after propensity score matching.MeasurementsThe primary endpoint was postoperative in-hospital cumulative opioid consumption (calculated as oral morphine milligram equivalents, MME). The secondary outcomes were intraoperative sufentanil doses, therapeutic use of antiemetic, pulmonary infection (assessed using a modified clinical pulmonary infection score, CPIS), durations of ICU and hospital stays, and ESPB related/unrelated complications.Main resultsThere is a lower oral MME in the ESPB group, 266 ± 126 mg in the ESPB group vs. 346 ± 105 mg in the control group (95% CI -113 to −46; P < 0.01). Fewer patients received therapeutic antiemetic agents in the ESPB group (30% vs. 42%, odds ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99; P = 0.04). The modified CPIS in the ESPB group is lower: 1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 1.0 (95% CI -0.9 to −0.3; P < 0.01) on postoperative day 1; 1.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.0 ± 0.9 (95% CI -0.7 to −0.2; P < 0.01) on postoperative day 2. The observed complications associated with ESPB include pneumothorax (1%), staxis around stomas (5%), hypotension (1%), catheter displacement (3%), and catheter obstruction (2%). None of the patients had any adverse outcomes.ConclusionIntermittent bolus ESPB is relatively safe and correlated with a reduction in the use of opioids and antiemetics for cardiac surgery through a lateral mini-thoracotomy.     

Estudio comparativo entre bloqueo paravertebral torácico,bloqueo de los nervios pectorales y bloqueo del músculo erector de la columna ecoguiados para el manejo del dolor en cirugías de cáncer de mama. Estudio controlado aleatorizado

ObjectivesAchieving adequate perioperative analgesia can be challenging in patients undergoing breast surgeries due to the complex nerve supply of the breast and axilla. The study aims to investigate the efficacy of ESPB in comparison to conventional regional anesthesia techniques (TPVB and PECS).MethodsEighty female patients who were scheduled for elective MRM, with ASA score I-II, and aged between 18 and 60 years, were included in the study. Patients were randomized into four groups: the TPVB, PECS, ESPB, and the control group. All patients in either block groups received 25 ml bupivacaine 0.25% with ultrasound guidance. The control group received only opioids for perioperative pain management. The patients were observed for 48 hours after surgery for the duration of analgesia (primary outcome)ResultsESPB has a shorter duration of analgesia than PECS block with no significant statistical difference compared with group TPVB. Morphine consumption is increased in ESPB compared to the PECS group, with an insignificant difference compared to group TPVB. There was an insignificant difference between the groups concerning hemodynamics and complications, with one pneumothorax case reported in the TPVB group.ConclusionPECS and ESPB represent a good alternative to TPVB for post-mastectomy analgesia with a superior analgesic effect of PECS block regarding opioid consumption, duration of the analgesia, and VAS score.