Evaluation of C1q Status and Titer of De Novo Donor‐Specific Antibodies as Predictors of Allograft Survival

De novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSAs) that develop after renal transplantation are independent predictors of allograft loss. However, it is unknown if dnDSA C1q status or titer at the time of first detection can independently predict allograft loss. In a consecutive cohort of 508 renal transplant recipients, 70 developed dnDSAs. Histologic and clinical outcomes were correlated with the C1q assay or dnDSA titer. C1q positivity correlated with dnDSA titer (p < 0.01) and mean fluorescence intensity (p < 0.01) and was more common in class II versus class I dnDSAs (p < 0.01). C1q status correlated with tubulitis (p = 0.02) and C4d status (p = 0.03) in biopsies at the time of dnDSA development, but not T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) or antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). De novo DSA titer correlated with Banff g, i, t, ptc, C4d scores, TCMR (p < 0.01) and ABMR (p < 0.01). Post‐dnDSA graft loss was observed more frequently in recipients with C1q‐positve dnDSA (p < 0.01) or dnDSA titer ≥ 1:1024 (p ≤ 0.01). However, after adjustment for clinical phenotype and nonadherence in multivariate models, neither C1q status nor dnDSA titer were independently associated with allograft loss, questioning the utility of these assays at the time of dnDSA development.     

Detection of donor-specific HLA antibodies: A retrospective observation in 350 renal transplant cases

BackgroundThe main objective of this study was to determine the results of the cell-based assay (CDC-XM and FC-XM), and correlate with the results of solid phase assay (L-SAB).MethodsIn this retrospective study, 350 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, FC-XM and L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor.ResultsT-cell-FC-XM showed a sensitivity of 71.43% and a specificity of 91.50% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-cell-FCXM showed a sensitivity of 94.94% and a specificity of 61.99% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). On the other hand, T-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 32.14% and a specificity of 98.64% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 44.30% and a specificity of 94.83% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). In this study, the results indicated that DSA class I MFI value of 2845 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 4585 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive T-cell-CDC-XM. However, DSA class II MFI cut-off of 1988 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with B-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 5986 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive B-cell-CDC-XM.ConclusionsOur study showed that CDC-XM has poor sensitivity, while FC-XM has poor specificity to detect DSA. L-SAB has good correlation with T-cell-FC-XM (p < 0.0001) but not with B-cell-FC-XM (P = 0.31). DSA strength >2845 and > 1988 significantly correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity and B-cell-FC-XM positivity, respectively. While, a MFI value of >4585 and > 5986 significantly correlated with T-cell-CDC-XM positivity and B-cell-CDC-XM positivity, respectively. These MFI cut-off values could serve as a surrogate marker for CDC-XM and FC-XM tests and may help in resolving the limitations of cell-based techniques. In conclusion, we found that L-SAB is more sensitive and specific than CDC-XM and FC-XM and therefore may be used as a test of choice.     

Comparison Between Total IgG,C1q,and C3d Single Antigen Bead Assays in Detecting Class I Complement-Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies

Background

Complement-binding donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection and allograft loss. Novel single antigen bead (SAB) assays—that is, complement component 1q (C1q) and complement component 3d (C3d) assays—have been developed to specifically detect complement-binding DSA, but it remains unclear whether these assays have an improved ability to detect complement-binding DSA as compared with using the total IgG SAB assay with a high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoff. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the total IgG, C1q, and C3d SAB assays in detecting complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies.

Correlation of Luminex-Based Single Antigen Based Results With Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch and Flow Cytometry Crossmatch Results: A Single-Center Experience From Istanbul

BackgroundThis study aimed to retrospectively investigate the correlation of mean Class I donor-specific antibody (DSA) intensity values detected in Luminex-based techniques with the results of complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) results.MethodsA total of 335 patients with kidney failure and their living donors whose CDC-XM, FC-XM, and single antigen based (SAB) tests were studied between 2018 and 2020 for transplant preparation from living donor candidates were included in the study. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to their mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of SAB assay.ResultsAnti-HLA antibodies (class I and/or class II) were detected using SAB in 91.6% patients included in the study (MFI >1000). Class I DSA was positive in 34.8% of patients with anti-HLA antibodies. When CDC-XM and FC-XM results were evaluated in the 4 groups separated according to MFI values, 3 patients with DSA MFI <1000 had negative CDC-XM and T-B-FC-XM results. Of 32 patients with DSA-MFI between 1000 and 3000, 93.75% (n = 30) had T-B-FC-XM or CDC-XM-negative results, and 6.25% (n = 2) had B-FC-XM-positive results. The CDC-XM, T, and B-FC-XM were negative in all 17 patients with DSA-MFI between 3000 and 5000. Our results showed that MFI >5834 DSA values were significantly correlated with positive T-FC-XM (P < .001), and MFI >6016 values were significantly correlated with positive CDC-XM (P = .002). In addition, MFI values >5000 were associated with both CDC-XM and FC-XM in our study.ConclusionsThe MFI values >5000 correlated with both CDC-XM and FC-XM.     

Role of Early Serial Renal Transplant Allograft Protocol Biopsies in Living Kidney Transplantations

PurposeThis study aimed to analyze the incidence of subclinical rejection (SCR) in kidney transplantation patients and risk factors associated with SCR.MethodsWe assessed 80 protocol biopsies taken within 2 years postoperatively in 41 adult patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation between 2017 and 2020. All patients were on immunosuppressant therapy that included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.ResultsThe prevalence of Banff Borderline classification at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation was 4%, 5%, and 8 %, respectively, whereas none of the biopsies met the Banff criteria for acute T cell-mediated rejection throughout the study period. Active antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) was only present in 8% of patients at 3 months after transplantation and chronic active ABMR at 6, 12, and 24 months after transplantation was detected in 10%, 13%, and 11% of the patients, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that 50% of the 6 patients with preformed anti-donor specific antibodies (DSAs) developed clinical or subclinical active ABMR within 3 months after transplantation, followed by chronic active ABMR according to serial histologic assessment. Conversely, only a small proportion of patients (3%) without preformed DSAs exhibited clinically active ABMR.ConclusionsSCR occurs too infrequently in patients with low immunologic risk and strong contemporary immunosuppression therapy to justify the diagnostic effort of serial protocol biopsies. However, protocol biopsies remain an indispensable tool in renal transplant monitoring and may be especially important in immunologically high-risk patients with pre-existing DSAs.     

Novel Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Detection of Anti-HLA Complement Activating Donor-Specific Antibodies in Renal Transplant Recipients and Its Comparison With Other Conventional Detection Methods

BackgroundPresence of preformed donor specific antibodies (DSAs) detected by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC-XM) is a strong contraindication for transplant. However, it has limitations including its sensitivity and its inability to distinguish between HLA-specific and other non-HLA-specific antibodies. In this study, we standardized CDC-XM by flow cytometry and determined its relevance by comparing its results with other methods of DSA detection, such as routine CDC-XM, antibody binding assay by flow cytometry (FC-XM), and Luminex-based crossmatch assays, such as Luminex crossmatch (LXM) and virtual crossmatch (VXM).Materials and MethodsA total of 79 serum samples were tested for DSAs by the flow cytometric complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch assay (FC-CDC-XM) and then the results of FC-CDC-XM were compared with other detection methods such as CDC-XM, FC-XM, LXM, and VXM.ResultsWe found that the FC-CDC-XM assay is more sensitive than routine CDC-XM. Out of total 79 sera, 24 sera were detected positive (T cells positive: 1 case and B cells positive: 23) by FC-CDC-XM as compared with 3 sera using CDC-XM; these 3 sera also showed positivity by FC-CDC-XM. After FC-XM assay, 23 samples were positive by FC-XM and out of these 23 samples, 13 were also positive by FC-CDC-XM. On comparing the FC-CDC-XM results with VXM and LXM, 10 sera of 24 FC-CDC-XM positive had HLA class II antibodies detected on a Luminex platform.ConclusionsThe FC-CDC-XM is a more sensitive and specific method for detection of HLA-specific complement-fixing antibodies than CDC-XM and FC-XM. FC-CDC-XM should be used in tissue-typing laboratories after intra- and inter- laboratory validation.     

Preformed C1q-binding Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation

Background

De novo complement-binding donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) are reportedly associated with an increased risk of kidney graft failure, but there is little information on preformed complement-binding DSAs. This study investigated the correlation between preformed C1q-binding DSAs and medium-term outcomes in kidney transplantation (KT).

Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 1066 cases

BackgroundPatients awaiting solid organ transplantation may develop anti-HLA antibodies after sensitization events such as transfusions, pregnancies, or previous transplantations. However, the effects of a particular sensitization event on HLA alloimmunization have not been well studied in parallel using cell-based assays and solid-phase assays. In this study, we evaluated and compare how different sensitization events affect the HLA antibody screening (HLA-Ab) and donor specific antibody (DSA) status in solid renal organ transplantation patients.MethodsHLA antibody (HLA-Ab) screening tests like complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM), flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) and Luminex panel-reactive antibody (L-PRA) were performed in all 1066 patients (635 males and 431 females). If any of these tests turned out to be positive, a Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay was performed for DSA identification. Test positive rates and antibody strengths were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.ResultsIn this study, HLA-Ab screening tests positive rates (L-PRA, FC-XM and CDC-XM) were significantly higher in patients with previous transplantation (73.91%, 100% and 56.52% p < 0.001), previous pregnancy (57.46%, 70.14% and 18.85% p < 0.001) or blood transfusion (27.33%, 35.55% and 7.33% p < 0.001) compared with patients without a sensitizing event (6.17%, 13.58% and 1.09). In this study, re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength (DSA) than non sensitized group (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 2659, 3329; P < 0.001) and those with single sensitization events of transfusion (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 5790.26, 6004.16; P < 0.001) or pregnancy (class I & II MFI 11418, 17,837 vs class I and II MFI 8631.71, 7253.29; P < 0.001).ConclusionsPregnancy and blood transfused had high allo-immunization rate for class I HLA antigens. While re-transplantation patients had high allo-immunization rate for both the HLA classes (HLA- class I and HLA- class II). Re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength, followed by pregnancy and then transfusion.     

Complement-fixing donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and kidney allograft failure

Detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has improved the risk classification and post-transplant evaluation of kidney recipients. Moreover, assessment of DSA C1q-binding ability has been shown to improve the individual risk classification of transplant patients for allograft loss, especially when detected after transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional clinical impact of C1q-binding DSA detection in a population that was extensively monitored for DSA and MFI alterations. Forty-two kidney allograft recipients were followed-up at multiple time points for up to 5 years after transplantation for the presence of anti-HLA DSA-IgG total. The samples that were positive for these antibodies were retrospectively tested for the presence of complement-binding antibodies. Overall, 24 patients presented DSA, 29% (7) of which also produced complement-binding DSA. Compared to patients with non-C1q-binding DSA and non-sensitized patients, patients with C1q-binding DSA after transplantation had the lowest allograft survival rate at 5 years (p = 0.042) and showed a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) during the post-transplant follow-up period (p = 0.01). Thus, post-transplant monitoring for complement-binding DSA is a useful tool for predicting individuals most at risk for allograft failure, and might also be beneficial for evaluation of immunosuppression regimens.     

C3d-binding Donor-specific HLA Antibody Is Associated With a High Risk of Antibody-mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Cohort Study

Background

One risk factor for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and poor outcome after kidney transplantation is donor-specific anti?human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies (DSAs). In this study we sought to determine whether the presence of DSAs that bind complement component C3d could better predict ABMR and graft loss in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Evaluation of Pretransplant Donor-Specific Alloantibodies With Different Crossmatch Techniques

Donor-recipient crossmatching for kidney transplantation is an obligatory step for the transplant work-up process. Attention is currently put on single bead assay (SBA) that enables virtual crossmatching. In contrast, methods developed for complement binding capacity are still not routinely established. We compared modified, cytolytic flow cytometry crossmatch (cFC-XM) with complement-dependent serological crossmatch (CDC-XM), SBA, and flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) to verify whether newly developed techniques may be beneficial for transplant immunological matching. Also, the cutoff value for donor-specific alloantibodies levels currently used for virtual crossmatch was verified. Serum from 22 sensitized patients was crossmatched with surrogate donors by CDC-XM, FC-XM, and cFC-XM, while anti-HLA antibodies were measured by SBA. In all cases, virtual crossmatch was positive at 5000 mean fluorescence intensity cutoff. Among 22 tested sera with donor-specific alloantibodies above 5000 mean fluorescence intensity, the positive CDC-XM result was noted only in 41% of patients (n = 9), but positive FC-XM was noted in 86% (n = 19), and further lytic antibodies (cFC-XM) were confirmed in 27% of cases (n = 6). Our results suggest that donor-recipient immunological matching for kidney transplantation requires different methods to verify the importance of alloantibodies, and improvement in laboratory investigation is needed. This is especially important for immunized patients that have many types of alloantibodies and virtual crossmatching used as a tool for deceased donor allocation should balance between the likelihood of transplantation and risk of positive crossmatch result.     

Post-transplant de novo non donor-specific HLA antibodies are not associated with poor graft outcome in non-sensitized pediatric recipients of kidney transplantation

While de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSAs) have a detrimental impact on kidney graft outcome, the clinical significance of de novo non donor-specific antibodies (dnNDSAs) is more controversial. We retrospectively evaluated for Ab development and characteristics of dnNDSAs serially collected post-transplant sera and, when available, graft biopsy eluates, from 144 non-sensitized, primary pediatric kidney recipients, consecutively transplanted at a single center between 2003 and 2017, using HLA class I and class II single-antigen flow-bead assays (SAB). The results were compared with clinical-pathologic data from HLA antibody negative and HLA dnDSA-positive patients.Forty-five out of 144 patients developed dnNDSAs (31%). Among the dnNDSA-positive patients, 86% displayed one or more class I/II antibodies recognizing antigens included in the CREG/shared epitope groups that also comprise the mismatched donor HLA antigens. Despite potential pathogenicity, as suggested by their occasional presence within the graft, dnNDSAs displayed significantly lower MFI, and limited complement binding and graft homing properties, when compared with dnDSAs. In parallel, the graft survival probability was significantly lower in patients with dnDSA than in those with dnNDSA or without HLA antibodies (p < 0.005). Indeed, the dnNDSA-positive patients remaining dnDSA-negative throughout the posttransplant period did not develop clinical antibody mediated rejection and graft loss, and maintained good graft function at a median follow-up of 9 years. The biological characteristics of dnNDSAs may account for the low graft damaging capability when compared to dnDSAs.     

Impact of the immunotherapy induction on allograft outcome and survival in kidney transplant patients with donor-specific antibodies to HLA-DQB1

BackgroundThe presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against HLA-DQB1 is considered a significant barrier to good outcome and allograft survival in kidney transplantation (KT). This study aimed to assess the impact of induction immunotherapy on the outcome and allograft survival in KT patients with HLA-DQB1-DSA.MethodologyThirty-two patients who had undergone KT and found to be positive for HLA-DQB1-DSA were monitored at least one to 10 years. They were allocated into two groups of patients: G1 received induction immunotherapy (n = 14 patients; 43.75%), and G2 did not (n = 18 patients; 56.25%).ResultsIn G1, 6 (42.86%) patients experienced rejection episodes (RE), 2 (14.29%) due to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 4 (28.57%) due to T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In G2, 13 (72.22%) patients experienced RE, 3 (16.67%) due to ABMR, and 10 (55.56%) due to TCMR. Graft loss occurred in 4 patients from G1, 2 (14.29%) due to ABMR and 2 (14.29%) due to non-immunological causes. In G2, 9 (50.00%) patients lost their grafts, 2 (11.11%) due to TCMR, 2 (11.11%) due to ABMR, and 5 (27.78%) due to non-immunological causes. The graft survival rate was 64.29% in G1 and 45.83% in G2. Glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis were observed in 3 and C4d-positive patients with/or without induction who lost their grafts by ABMR by HLA-DQ DSA. Two patients from G2 lost their graft by TCMR due to interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate (i1), foci of mild tubulitis (t2), interstitial edema, moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Better graft survival rates were shown in patients from G1 who received induction immunotherapy.ConclusionOur study suggests that patients with an immunological profile of HLA-DQ+ DSA+ treated by immunotherapy induction have a decreased risk of ABMR and increased allograft survival, and the presence of anti-HLA-DQB1 DSA+ detected before and after KT were associated with ABMR episodes and failure.     

Acquisition of C3d‐Binding Activity by De Novo Donor‐Specific HLA Antibodies Correlates With Graft Loss in Nonsensitized Pediatric Kidney Recipients

Alloantibody‐mediated graft injury is a major cause of kidney dysfunction and loss. The complement‐binding ability of de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSAs) has been suggested as a prognostic tool to stratify patients for clinical risk. In this study, we analyzed posttransplant kinetics of complement‐fixing dnDSAs and their role in antibody‐mediated rejection development and graft loss. A total of 114 pediatric nonsensitized recipients of first kidney allograft were periodically monitored for dnDSAs using flow bead assays, followed by C3d and C1q assay in case of positivity. Overall, 39 patients developed dnDSAs, which were C1q⁺ and C3d⁺ in 25 and nine patients, respectively. At follow‐up, progressive acquisition over time of dnDSA C1q and C3d binding ability, within the same antigenic specificity, was observed, paralleled by an increase in mean fluorescence intensity that correlated with clinical outcome. C3d‐fixing dnDSAs were better fit to stratify graft loss risk when the different dnDSA categories were evaluated in combined models because the 10‐year graft survival probability was lower in patients with C3d‐binding dnDSA than in those without dnDSAs or with C1q⁺/C3d^? or non‐complement‐binding dnDSAs (40% vs. 94%, 100%, and 100%, respectively). Based on the kinetics profile, we favor dnDSA removal or modulation at first confirmed positivity, with treatment intensification guided by dnDSA biological characteristics.     

IgG Donor-Specific Anti-Human HLA Antibody Subclasses and Kidney Allograft Antibody-Mediated Injury

Antibodies may have different pathogenicities according to IgG subclass. We investigated the association between IgG subclasses of circulating anti-human HLA antibodies and antibody-mediated kidney allograft injury. Among 635 consecutive kidney transplantations performed between 2008 and 2010, we enrolled 125 patients with donor-specific anti-human HLA antibodies (DSA) detected in the first year post-transplant. We assessed DSA characteristics, including specificity, HLA class specificity, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), C1q-binding, and IgG subclass, and graft injury phenotype at the time of sera evaluation. Overall, 51 (40.8%) patients had acute antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR), 36 (28.8%) patients had subclinical ABMR (sABMR), and 38 (30.4%) patients were ABMR-free. The MFI of the immunodominant DSA (iDSA, the DSA with the highest MFI level) was 6724±464, and 41.6% of patients had iDSA showing C1q positivity. The distribution of iDSA IgG1–4 subclasses among the population was 75.2%, 44.0%, 28.0%, and 26.4%, respectively. An unsupervised principal component analysis integrating iDSA IgG subclasses revealed aABMR was mainly driven by IgG3 iDSA, whereas sABMR was driven by IgG4 iDSA. IgG3 iDSA was associated with a shorter time to rejection (P<0.001), increased microcirculation injury (P=0.002), and C4d capillary deposition (P<0.001). IgG4 iDSA was associated with later allograft injury with increased allograft glomerulopathy and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy lesions (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Integrating iDSA HLA class specificity, MFI level, C1q-binding status, and IgG subclasses in a Cox survival model revealed IgG3 iDSA and C1q-binding iDSA were strongly and independently associated with allograft failure. These results suggest IgG iDSA subclasses identify distinct phenotypes of kidney allograft antibody-mediated injury.     

Carfilzomib versus rituximab for treatment of de novo donor-specific antibodies in lung transplant recipients

IntroductionDe novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) increase the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Both carfilzomib (CFZ) and rituximab (RTX) lower the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of DSAs, but comparative data are lacking. We compared CLAD-free survival and the degree and duration of DSA depletion after treatment of LTRs with CFZ or RTX.MethodsLTRs that received CFZ or RTX for DSA depletion between 08/01/2015 and 08/31/2020 were included. The primary outcome was CLAD-free survival. Secondary outcomes were change in MFI at corresponding loci within 6 months of treatment (ΔMFI), time to DSA rebound, and change in % predicted FEV₁ 6 months after treatment (ΔFEV₁).ResultsForty-four LTRs were identified, 7 of whom had ≥2 drug events; therefore, 53 drug events were divided into 2 groups, CFZ (n = 17) and RTX (n = 36). Use of plasmapheresis, immunoglobulin, and mycophenolate augmentation was equivalent in both groups. CLAD-free survival with a single RTX event was superior to that after ≥2 drug events (p = 0.001) but comparable to that with a single CFZ event (p = 0.399). Both drugs significantly lowered the MFI at DQ locus, and the median ΔMFI was comparable. Compared to the RTX group, the CFZ group had a shorter median interval to DSA rebound (p = 0.015) and a lower ΔFEV₁ at 6 months (p = 0.014).ConclusionAlthough both CFZ and RTX reduced the MFI of circulating DSAs, RTX prolonged the time to DSA rebound. Despite more pronounced improvement in FEV₁ with RTX, comparable CLAD-free survival between the 2 groups suggests that both drugs offer a reasonable treatment strategy for DSAs in LTRs.     

Preformed donor‐specific antibodies do not affect the 1‐year allograft survival in living donor liver transplantation

The effect of preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) on liver transplantation (LT) remains unclear, especially in the field of living donor LT (LDLT). Herein, we evaluated the prevalence of preformed DSAs and their effect on graft outcome in LDLT in the first year following surgery. Using the Luminex^® Single Antigen assay, we analyzed the preoperative sera of 61 adult LDLT recipients between 2014 and 2015. Clinical outcomes and pathologic findings including complement component 4d (C4d) expression in the first year after LT were retrospectively reviewed. Regardless of the class of DSA, DSAs with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥1000 were defined as positive and preformed DSA with MFI ≥5000 was defined as strongly positive. Fifteen patients (24.6%) had preformed DSAs, and 8 patients (13.1%) showed strongly positive preformed DSAs. Among 15 DSA positive patients, 2 (13.3%) showed persistent DSAs after LDLT. No de novo DSAs were noted in patients without preformed DSAs. Preformed DSAs were not related to graft dysfunction, laboratory values, or C4d expression or other pathologic findings in the first year of LDLT. In conclusion, preformed DSAs persisted during follow‐up in 13.3% of cases and did not have adverse effect on histologic or clinical outcomes in the first year of LDLT.     

Belatacept in renal transplant recipient with mild immunologic risk factor: A pilot prospective study (BELACOR)

The benefit of belatacept on antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) incidence after kidney transplant with preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) has never been assessed. Between 2014 and 2016, we conducted a multicenter prospective clinical trial with 49 patients to determine kidney allograft outcome in recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000) treated with belatacept (BELACOR trial). Immunosuppressive strategy included antithymocyte globulin, belatacept, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. An ancillary control group was designed retrospectively, including patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria treated with calcineurin inhibitors. In BELACOR group, no patient exhibited acute ABMR, patient and allograft survival at 1 year was 100% and 95.4%, respectively, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 53.2 mL/min/1.73 m². However, the 12‐month incidence of acute T cell–mediated rejection was 25.4% (14.5% to 42.4%). Comparison with the control group showed significantly higher T cell–mediated rejection incidence only in the BELACOR group (P = .003). Considering the DSAs, the outcome was similar in the 2 groups except a significantly higher number of patients displayed a complete disappearance of class II DSAs in the BELACOR group (P = .001). Belatacept was not associated with an acute ABMR increased risk and may be considered as immunosuppressive strategy in transplant recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000). Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.     

Non-HLA Antibodies and Their Role in Highly Sensitized Patients

BackgroundThe role of non-HLA antibody is gaining special attention in solid-organ transplantation and in highly sensitized (HS) patients because of its potential involvement in graft loss (GL) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The identification of non-HLA antibodies while listed may provide deeper information about the increased immunologic risk prior to transplant. We aimed to identify non-HLA antibodies pretransplant that could involve GL in HS patients.MethodsNineteen pretransplant samples from HS patients who underwent transplant at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital were studied for both HLA antibodies and a panel of 39 non-HLA antigens analyzed based on Luminex platform.ResultsEleven patient (57.9%) maintained the graft (KT group), whereas 8 (42.1%) had a GL within a median of 30 days. The median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the 39 non-HLA antigens were compared within the groups, obtaining a statistically significant differences in protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N (P < .04) with a MFI mean of 1408 vs 4931 for KT and GL groups, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in non-HLA MFI between ABMR and non-ABMR KT recipients.ConclusionsThe presence of non-HLA antibodies in HS is high. The levels of anti–protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N before transplant could indicate a potential risk of GL, although longitudinal studies with large number of cases are needed to define anti–non-HLA profiles of risk of ABMR.     

Value of C3d assay and IgG subclass in the prediction of the flow cytometry cross-match result for renal transplantation

The aim of this study is to compare the association and the predictive capacity of DSA MFI, complement fixing capacity (C3d assay) and IgG subclasses determination in the prediction of FCxM result.MethodsWe used cryopreserved (70C) sera from potential renal transplant recipients, containing DSA against their respective potential donors. All patients showed negative AHG-CDC CxM and either positive or negative FCxM. Class I and Class II HLA-DSA were determined by Luminex SAB. C3d were detected by Luminex (Lifecodes®Immucor), DSA IgG 1–4 subclasses were evaluated using monoclonal antibodies specific for IgG subclasses (Luminex).Results93 donor/recipient tests were evaluated; 32 (35.9%) patients presented at least one C3d + Ab, of which only 11 (11.8%) were donor specific. At least one IgG subclass was identified in 45 samples (48.3%). Twenty-seven FCxM tests (29%) were positive. On multivariate analysis HLA mismatches, the IgG subclass detection, DSA MFI and class II PRA remain associated to FCxM whereas C3d + Ab was not associated. For the FCxM prediction, the IgG subclass detection in combination with the DSA-MFI > 2800, had the best negative predictive value 93.9 (CI 95%, 84.2–100).ConclusionNeither the C3d assay nor the IgG subclasses detection alone had an adequate predictive capacity for the FCxM. In the absence of IgG subclass detection and DSA-MFI < 2000, the probability of a negative FCxM was near 94%.