Determination of relationship between foot arch,hindfoot, and hallux motion using Oxford foot model: Comparison between walking and running

BackgroundThe foot arch plays an important role in propulsion and shock absorption during walking and running; however, the relationship among the foot arch, metatarsal locking theory, and nature of the windlass mechanism (WM) remain unclear. Research question: What are the differences in the kinematic relationship between the foot arch, hindfoot, and hallux during walking and running?MethodsRelative angles within the foot were measured in 18 healthy men using the Oxford foot model (OFM). Data for barefoot walking at a comfortable speed and rearfoot running at 2.0 m/s were collected. Angles of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot (OFM-arch), hallux relative to the forefoot (Hallux) on the sagittal plane, and hindfoot relative to the shank (Hindfoot) on three anatomical planes were obtained. The medial longitudinal arch (MLA) angle was calculated to verify that OFM-arch can substitute the MLA angle. Each parameter was subjected to cross-correlation analysis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to examine the relationship with OFM-arch and compare them during walking and running.ResultOFM-arch was similar to the conventional MLA projection angle in both trials (gait: 0.79, running: 0.96 p < 0.01). Synchronization of the OFM-arch and Hallux angles was higher in running than in walking (gait: −0.09, running: −0.75 p < 0.01). Hindfoot supination was unrelated to OFM-arch. Hindfoot angle on the transverse plane exhibited a moderate relationship with OFM-arch, indicating different correlations in walking and running (gait: 0.63, running: −0.68 p < 0.01).Significance: The elevation of the foot arch due to hallux dorsiflexion differed during walking and running; hence, other factors besides WM (such as intrinsic muscles) may affect the foot arch elevation during running. The hindfoot in the frontal plane does not contribute to arch raising and foot stability during running; it features different relationships with OFM-arch during walking and running.     

Increased plantar foot pressure in persons affected by leprosy

Although foot pressure has been reported to be increased in people affected by leprosy, studies on foot pressure and its determinants are limited. Therefore, the aim was to assess barefoot plantar foot pressure and to identify clinical determinants of increased plantar foot pressure in leprosy affected persons. Plantar pressure in both feet was assessed using the Novel EMED-X platform in 39 persons affected by leprosy. Peak pressure was determined for the total foot and four regions: hallux, metatarsal heads, midfoot and heel. Potential determinants were: age, weight, nerve function (Neuropathy Disability Score, Pressure Perception Threshold and Vibration Perception Threshold), toe and foot deformities, joint mobility, ankle muscle strength and callus. Increased peak pressure (>600kPa) was observed in 46% of the participants. The highest peak pressure (mean) was found in the metatarsal heads region (right 549 (SD 321)kPa; left 530 (SD 298)kPa). Multilevel regression analysis showed that Neuropathy Disability Score, amputation/absorption of toes and hallux valgus independently contributed to metatarsal heads peak pressure in persons affected with leprosy. To conclude, peak pressure is increased in people affected by leprosy. The highest peak pressure is found in the forefoot region and is significantly associated to Neuropathy Disability Score, toe amputation/absorption and hallux valgus. Screening for clinical characteristics can be used to identify individual persons affected by leprosy at risk of excessive pressure.     

Effects of running-induced fatigue on plantar pressure distribution in runners with different strike types

BackgroundRunning induced-fatigue is an important factor in running related injuries. Runners with different strike types have different running mechanics and suffer from different injury patterns. Underlying mechanism of this difference is not well understood.Research questionThe aim of this study was to examine the effects of running-induced fatigue on plantar pressure distribution in runners with different strike types.Methods30 rearfoot (age = 21.56 ± 2.28 years; height = 1.67 ± 0.08 m; mass = 61.43 ± 11.57 kg; BMI = 21.77 ± 2.9 kg∙m⁻²) and 30 forefoot (age = 19.73 ± 1.68 years; height = 1.71 ± 0.08 m; mass = 65.7 ± 13.45; BMI = 22.53 ± 3.39 kg∙m⁻²) strike male and female recreational runners were recruited to this study. Participants ran in 3.3 m/s barefoot along the plantar pressure measuring device (Footscan®, Rsscan International) before and after running-induced fatigue. Fatigue protocol was performed on a treadmill. Peak plantar pressure and peak plantar force (% body weight), contact time and medio-lateral force ratio were calculated while running. Repeated measures ANOVA test was used to investigate the effect of running-induced fatigue on plantar pressure variables (p ≤ 0.05).ResultsAfter running-induced fatigue, in the rearfoot strike group, increases in loading of medial and lateral portions of the heel, first metatarsal and big toe was observed, and in lesser toes and in the forefoot push off phase, the medio-lateral force ratio decreased. While, in the forefoot strike group first to third metatarsals loading increased and fifth metatarsal loading decreased after fatigue, and medio-lateral force ratio in the foot flat and forefoot push off phase increased. In both groups contact time increased after fatigue.SignificanceOur data indicate that running-induced fatigue has different effects on plantar pressure distribution pattern in runners with different strike type. These different effects reflect different adaptation strategies in runners with different strike types, and could explain existence of different injury patterns in runners with different strike types.     

A functional foot type classification with cluster analysis based on plantar pressure distribution during jogging

The purpose of this study was to establish a reference dataset for peak pressures and pressure-time integrals during jogging, to compare this reference dataset with existing walking data and to develop a foot type classification, all based on plantar pressure data obtained from 215 healthy young adults. The subjects ran at 3.3 m s(-1) over a 16.5 m long running track, with a built-in pressure platform mounted on top of a force platform. Peak pressures, regional impulses and relative regional impulses were measured. These variables were found to be reliable (all intra class correlation coefficients above 0.75) and, except for the heel areas, gender and asymmetry effects could be neglected. Highest peak pressures were found under the heel due to large impact forces during initial contact phase (ICP). In the forefoot, the highest peak pressure was found under the second metatarsal (64.2 +/- 21.1 N cm(-2)). Compared to walking data, overall higher peak pressures and impulses and difference in hallux loading were found during barefoot jogging. Four pressure loading patterns were identified using a K-means cluster analysis, based on the relative regional impulses underneath the forefoot: medial M1 pattern, medial M2 pattern, central pattern and central-lateral pattern. These four pressure loading patterns could help in the functional interpretation of the foot behaviour during the stance phase in slow running.     

Long distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: a barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners

BACKGROUND: The growing popularity of endurance sports activities is associated with a growing number of metatarsal stress fractures in recreational runners. Excessive foot loading has been suggested as a potential cause for these problems [Bennell, K, Matheson G, Meeuwisse W, Brukner P. Risk factors for stress fractures. Sports Med 1999;28(2):91-122]. Therefore, the question arises whether long distance running affects foot loading characteristics like ground reaction forces and peak pressure in specific areas of the foot. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of long distance running on plantar pressure patterns before and after a marathon race. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measurements of recreational runners before and after a marathon race. METHODS: Two hundred participants of the third Muenster marathon, 2004, were measured before and after the race with plantar pressure measurements during barefoot walking on a capacitive platform. The ratio between forefoot and toe loading was calculated to assess a suggested loading shift between these areas. RESULTS: The results of the whole group of participants revealed a significant difference in foot loading characteristics before and after the race. Post-race peak pressure and impulse values were higher in the forefoot regions and reduced under the toes. CONCLUSIONS: The increased peak pressure under the metatarsal heads after the race indicates a load shift from the toes to the metatarsal heads. This suggests an increased loading of the metatarsal bones and could explain the increased incidence of metatarsal stress fractures in long distance runners.     

Temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging: reference data for young adults

The purpose of this study was to establish a representative reference dataset for temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging, based on plantar pressure data collected from 220 healthy young adults. The subjects ran at 3.3 m s⁻¹ over a 16.5 m long running track, having a built-in pressure platform mounted on a force platform. The initial contact, final contact, time to peak pressure and the duration of contact at the lateral and medial heel, metatarsal heads I to V and the hallux were measured. Temporal plantar pressure variables were found to be reliable (93% of ICC coefficients above 0.75) and both gender and asymmetry influences could be neglected. Foot roll-over during jogging started with heel contact followed by a latero-medial contact of the metatarsals and finally the hallux. After heel off, the forefoot started to push off at the lateral metatarsals, followed by a more central push off over the second metatarsal and finally over the hallux. Based on the plantar pressure data, the stance phase during running was divided into four distinct phases: initial contact (8.2%), forefoot contact (11.3%), foot flat (25.3%) and forefoot push off (55.1%). These findings provide a reliable and representative reference dataset for temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during jogging of young adults that may also be relevant in the evaluation of running patterns.     

Reliability of peak foot pressure in patients with previous diabetic foot ulceration

BackgroundPrevious reliability studies on peak plantar pressure measurements in patients with previous diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) did not stratify their analyses according to whether the foot had a previous ulcer.Research questionDoes test-retest reliability of peak foot pressure measurements from the various foot regions differ between the ulcerated and non-ulcerated feet?MethodsData from 23 participants with peripheral neuropathy and healed plantar DFU were analysed in this test-retest reliability comparison study. Plantar pressure was evaluated on two sessions using Pedar^®-X in-shoe system, with a mean of 7.2 days (SD = 1.6) between sessions.ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for 10 foot regions. Overall, test-retest reliability was excellent (ICCs, 0.82 to 0.95) for all peak pressure variables. CV ranged between 6.3% and 18.3%, and exceeded 15% over the hallux and medial forefoot regions in the ulcer foot (18.3% and 16.4%, respectively). Hallux peak pressure CV was significantly higher over the ulcer foot than over the non-ulcer foot (5.7%, 95% CI, 1.7%–10.2%). Peak pressure CV over the forefoot also tended to be higher over the ulcer foot (medial forefoot: 6.1%, 95% CI, -0.5%–14.5%; lateral forefoot: 4.1%, 95%CI, -0.7%–11.1%).SignificancePeak plantar foot pressure may be useful to distinguish between groups of patients with peripheral neuropathy and healed plantar DFU. However, clinical decisions based on ulcer foot hallux and forefoot peak pressure measurements should be interpreted with caution.     

Gait, balance and plantar pressures in older people with toe deformities

Older people with toe deformities have been identified as having an increased risk of falling. Little is known, however, about the biomechanical changes that might contribute to this increased risk. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether older people with hallux valgus and lesser toe deformities displayed different gait, balance and plantar pressure characteristics compared to individuals without toe deformities. The presence of hallux valgus and lesser toe deformities were assessed for 312 community-dwelling older men and women. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured using the GAITrite^® system, postural sway was assessed on two surfaces using a sway-meter and dynamic plantar pressure distribution was measured using an Emed-AT4 pressure plate. The results indicated that, although there were no effects of toe deformities on spatiotemporal gait characteristics or postural sway, older people with hallux valgus (n = 36) and lesser toe deformities (n = 71) were found to display altered forefoot plantar pressure patterns. These findings suggest that toe deformities alter weight distribution under the foot when walking, but that the relationship between toe deformities and falls may be mediated by factors other than changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters or impaired postural sway.     

Effects of rocker radii with two longitudinal bending stiffnesses on plantar pressure distribution in the forefoot

IntroductionOutsole parameters of the shoe can be adapted to offload regions of pain or region of high pressures. Previous studies already showed reduced plantar pressures in the forefoot due to a proximally placed apex position and higher longitudinal bending stiffness (LBS). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of changes in rocker radii and high LBS on the plantar pressure profile during gait.Method10 participants walked in seven shoe conditions of which one control shoe and six rocker shoes with small, medium and large rocker radii and low and high longitudinal bending stiffness. Pedar in-shoe plantar pressure measuring system was used to quantify plantar pressures while walking on a treadmill at self-selected walking speed. Peak plantar pressure, maximum mean pressure and force-time integral were analyzed with Generalized Estimated Equation (GEE) and Tukey post hoc correction (α = .05).ResultsSignificantly lower plantar pressures were found in the first toe, toes 2–5, distal and proximal forefoot in all rocker shoe conditions as compared to the control shoe. Plantar pressures in the first toe and toes 2–5 were significantly lower in the small radius compared to medium and large radii. For the distal forefoot both small and medium radii significantly reduced plantar pressure compared to large radii. Low LBS reduced plantar pressure at the first toe significantly compared to high LBS independent of the rocker radius. Plantar pressures in the distal forefoot and toes 2–5 were lower in high LBS compared to low LBS.ConclusionManipulation of the rocker radius and LBS can effectively reduce peak plantar pressures in the forefoot region during gait. In line with previous studies, we showed that depending on the exact target location for offloading, different combinations of rocker radius and LBS need to be adopted to maximize treatment effects.     

The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running

The purpose of this study was to determine if low arch feet have altered plantar loading patterns when compared to normal feet during both walking and running. Fifty healthy subjects (34 normal feet, 16 flat feet) walked and ran five trials each at standard speeds. In-shoe pressure data were collected at 50 Hz. Contact area, peak pressure, maximum force, and force-time integral were analyzed in eight different regions of the foot. Foot type was determined by examining navicular height, arch angle, rearfoot angle, and a clinical score. A series of 2 x 2 repeated measures ANOVAs were used to determine statistical differences (alpha<0.05). A significant interaction existed between foot type and movement type for the maximum force in the medial midfoot. Total foot contact area, maximum force and peak pressure were significantly increased during running. Contact area in each insole area, except for the rearfoot, was significantly increased during running. Peak pressure and maximum force were significantly increased during running in each of the foot regions. However, the force-time integral was significantly decreased during running in the rearfoot, lateral midfoot, middle forefoot, and lateral forefoot. Significant differences between foot types existed for contact area in the medial midfoot and maximum force and peak pressure in the lateral forefoot. The maximum force and peak pressures were significantly decreased for the flat foot type. Therefore, individuals with a flat foot could be at a lower risk for lateral column metatarsal stress fractures, indicating that foot type should be assessed when determining an individual's risk for metatarsal stress fractures.     

Plantar pressure asymmetry and risk of stress injuries in the foot of young soccer players

BackgroundAsymmetries in the magnitude of plantar pressure are considered a risk factor for stress fracture of the fifth metatarsal in soccer athletes.ObjectiveTo investigate the presence of plantar pressure asymmetries among young soccer athletes.DesignObservational.SettingLaboratory.ParticipantsThirty young adolescents divided into a soccer player group (n = 15) or a matched control group (n = 15).Main outcome measuresMean plantar pressure was determined for seven different regions of the foot. Data were compared between the preferred and non-preferred foot, and between the groups, during barefoot standing on a pressure mat system.ResultsHigher pressure was found in the hallux, 5th metatarsal and medial rearfoot of the non-preferred foot in the young soccer players. These asymmetries were not observed in the control group. Magnitudes of plantar pressure did not differ between the groups.ConclusionYoung soccer players present asymmetries in plantar pressure in the hallux, 5th metatarsal and medial rearfoot, with higher pressure observed in the non-preferred foot.     

The insole materials influence the plantar pressure distributions in diabetic foot with neuropathy during different walking activities

BackgroundAbnormal peak plantar pressure in neuropathic diabetic foot during walking activities is well managed through the use of appropriate design and material selection for the fabrication of custom made insoles (CMI). The redistribution of plantar pressure is possible by selecting an appropriate material for the fabrication of CMI. The walking activities may alter the plantar pressure distribution; which may differ while using CMI with different materials.ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CMI’s materials on plantar pressure distribution during different walking activities, in diabetic feet with neuropathy.MethodsThe study was conducted on sixteen diabetic neuropathic subjects. The subjects were provided with two types of CMI; CMI-A (Plastazote® and microcellular rubber) and CMI-B (Multifoam, Plastazote® and microcellular rubber). Maximum peak plantar pressure and plantar pressure distribution were determined by Pedar-X® sensor insole during level walking, ramp walking and stair walking.ResultsThe CMI-B lessened the maximum peak plantar pressure from the forefoot throughout the walking activities compared to CMI-A. The contact area was observed as lower using CMI-A compared to CMI-B, while performing walking activities.ConclusionCMI-B, with multifoam as an additional top layer, provided more effective peak plantar pressure reduction at forefoot and it had better plantar pressure distribution compared to CMI-A during level walking and ramp ascending in diabetic foot with neuropathy.     

Kinematic and plantar pressure adjustments to downhill gradients during gait

The purpose of the study was to investigate the peak plantar pressure (PP) and kinematic adjustments to various negative gradients (−GR) and walking velocities (WV) during treadmill fitness walking. While filmed, plantar pressure data for seven sensors were collected for eight female subjects. Faster WV were associated with increased heel PP (P < 0.05), but decreased forefoot PP. During −GR, subjects exhibited increased fifth metatarsal PP, but decreased medial forefoot PP. Greater knee flexion and step length respectively were inversely and directly related to heel PP. These heel PP responses were related to individual subject adaptations to −GR.     

Vertical ground reaction forces during gait in children with and without calcaneal apophysitis

BackgroundHeightened vertical load beneath the foot has been anecdotally implicated in the development of activity-related heel pain of the calcaneal apophysis in children but is supported by limited evidence.Research questionThis study investigated whether vertical loading patterns during walking and running differed in children with and without calcaneal apophysitis.MethodsVertical ground reaction force, peak plantar pressure (forefoot, midfoot, heel) and temporospatial gait parameters (cadence, step length, stride, stance and swing phase durations) were determined in children with (n = 14) and without (n = 14) calcaneal apophysitis. Measures were acquired during barefoot walking and running at matched and self-selected speed using an instrumented treadmill, sampling at 120 Hz. Statistical comparisons between groups were made using repeated measure ANOVAs.ResultsThere were no significant between group differences in vertical ground reaction force peaks or regional peak plantar pressures. However, when normalised to stature, cadence was significantly higher (≈ 5%) and step length shorter (≈ 5%) in children with calcaneal apophysitis than those without, but only during running (P <.05). Maximum pressure beneath the rearfoot during running was significantly correlated with self-reported pain in children with calcaneal apophysitis.SignificancePeak vertical force and plantar pressures did not differ significantly in children with and without calcaneal apophysitis during walking or running. However, children with calcaneal apophysitis adopted a higher cadence than children without heel pain during running. While the findings suggest that children with calcaneal apophysitis may alter their cadence to lower pressure beneath the heel and, hence pain, they also highlight the benefit of evaluating running rather than walking gait in children with calcaneal apophysitis.     

Forefoot plantar shear stress distribution in hallux valgus patients

BackgroundHallux valgus is a common foot disorder often experienced with secondary callosities and metatarsalgia. Many factors including improper shoes might be responsible in the pathophysiology of the problem. Hallux valgus deformity has been shown to alter the biomechanics of the whole foot rather than affecting only the great toe. Due to changes in the biomechanical functioning of the first ray, other regions of the forefoot area have been shown to bear abnormal loads with increased vertical loading on medial, central and lateral forefoot regions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pattern of forefoot plantar shear loading in hallux valgus patients and compare these results with those of control subjects.MethodsA total of 28 subjects were recruited for the study of which 14 were clinically diagnosed with hallux valgus. A custom built platform was used to collect peak pressure and shear data. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the recorded data.FindingsAntero-posterior shear was significantly lower in the deformity group (p < 0.05). The lateral forefeet of the patients, however, experienced slightly higher shear loads (p > 0.05).InterpretationPropulsive shear force generation mechanism under the medial forefoot was impaired in the disorder group. In general, shear loading of the plantar feet shifted laterally. Previously hypothesized higher medio-lateral shear magnitudes under the hallux were not confirmed.     

Validity and reproducibility of foot motion analysis using a stretch strain sensor

BackgroundMulti-segment foot analysis is traditionally challenging to perform while subjects are wearing footwear or a foot orthosis and is difficult to apply in the clinical setting. A recently developed stretch strain sensor (STR), that is thin and highly flexible, may solve this limitation because it does not require observation using a camera and is highly portable.Research questionThis study aimed to examine the reproducibility and validity of foot motion analysis using the STR during walking and running by comparing it with a conventional motion capture system.MethodsTwenty-one healthy participants were examined in this study. The STR was placed on the participant's foot in one of two locations in separate experiments (spring ligament; SL and navicular drop; ND methods). Foot kinematic data during walking and running were simultaneously recorded using the STR and a three-dimensional motion capture system. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reproducibility of the STR method. Cross-correlation coefficient evaluated the similarity of the pattern of the signals between the two systems. Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between the STR measurement and angular excursion of the forefoot or hindfoot.ResultsThe ICCs of the SL method were 0.95 and 0.96, and those of the ND method were 0.93 and 0.71 during walking and running, respectively. In the SL method, the pattern of the signals between the STR and forefoot frontal motion was strongly correlated. The STR measurement was significantly correlated with forefoot eversion excursion (walking: r=-0.67, running: r=-0.64, p < 0.01 each). In the ND method, the STR signal was not associated with forefoot and hindfoot kinematics.SignificanceOur results showed that the STR has acceptable reproducibility and validity of foot motion analysis. This system may enable measurement of foot motion while subjects are wearing shoes and outside the laboratory.     

The immediate effects of hallux valgus orthoses: A comparison of orthosis designs

BackgroundHallux valgus orthoses are available in a wide range of designs and materials, but the effects of their design on functional performance have not been fully investigated.Research questionThis present study aims to comprehensively analyze the immediate effects of soft and semi-rigid hallux valgus orthoses on balance, plantar pressure, hallux valgus angle, and subjective sensations.MethodsSixteen female subjects have participated in the study, including 10 subjects with healthy feet and 6 with hallux valgus. Three conditions are tested, including in the barefoot and using two types of commercially available hallux valgus orthoses. The subjects participate in static and dynamic (walking) tests with the use of the Novel Pedar® system. The peak pressure values in the hallux, lateral toes, first metatarsophalangeal joint, 2-4th metatarsal heads, 5th metatarsal head, medial midfoot, lateral midfoot and rearfoot in the various foot conditions are examined and compared. The hallux valgus angle of each subject is measured based on their footprint. Their subjective feelings towards the orthoses are also evaluated. A repeated-measures analysis of variance, and independent-sample t-test are performed.ResultsThe correction of the hallux valgus angle is statistically significant when the subjects with hallux valgus use the orthoses. In comparing the two types of orthoses, the use of the orthosis made of soft materials results in correction in the hallux valgus angle and higher wear comfort, and lower plantar pressure in hallux area.SignificanceThe results provide insights into the design of hallux valgus orthoses, thus offering practical reference for the selection of hallux valgus orthosis with compromise between functional performance and wear comfort.     

Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults

BackgroundThe Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and Rizzoli Foot Model (RFM) are the two most frequently used multi-segment models to measure foot kinematics. However, a comprehensive comparison of the kinematic output of these models is lacking.Research questionWhat are the differences in kinematic output between OFM and RFM during normal gait and typical pathological gait patterns in healthy adults?.MethodsA combined OFM and RFM marker set was placed on the right foot of ten healthy subjects. A static standing trial and six level walking trials were collected for normal gait and for four voluntarily adopted gait types: equinus, crouch, toe-in and toe-out. Joint angles were calculated for every trial for the hindfoot relative to shank (HF-SH), forefoot relative to hindfoot (FF-HF) and hallux relative to forefoot (HX-FF). Average static joint angles of both models were compared between models. After subtracting these offsets, the remaining dynamic angles were compared using statistical parametric mapping repeated measures ANOVAs and t-tests. Furthermore, range of motion was compared between models for every angle.ResultsFor the static posture, RFM compared to OFM measured more plantar flexion (Δ = 6°) and internal rotation (Δ = 7°) for HF-SH, more plantar flexion (Δ = 34°) and inversion (Δ = 13°) for FF-HF and more dorsal flexion (Δ = 37°) and abduction (Δ = 12°) for HX-FF. During normal walking, kinematic differences were found in various parts of the gait cycle. Moreover, range of motion was larger in the HF-SH for OFM and in FF-HF and HX-FF for RFM. The differences between models were not the same for all gait types. Equinus and toe-out gait demonstrated most pronounced differences.SignificanceDifferences are present in kinematic output between OFM and RFM, which also depend on gait type. Therefore, kinematic output of foot and ankle studies should be interpreted with careful consideration of the multi-segment foot model used.