Discriminative stimulus properties of the dopamine D3 receptor agonists, PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT: a comparative characterization with novel ligands at D3 versus D2 receptors

Rats were trained to recognize a discriminative stimulus (DS) elicited by the preferential dopamine D3 receptor agonists, PD128,907 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.) and 7-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.). PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT showed "full" (> or = 80%) and mutual generalization. Chemically-diverse, preferential D3 versus D2 agonists, quinelorane, CGS15855A, pramipexole, ropinirole and piribedil, generalized to PD128,907 (and 7-OH-DPAT) in this order of potency, which correlated more strongly with affinity/activity at cloned human (h)D3 (r=0.68/0.81, n=7) than hD2 (0.27/0.64, n=7) receptors. Further, generalization potency strongly correlated with potency for suppression of response rates (0.86), induction of hypothermia (0.92), reduction of striatal dopamine turnover (0.92) and diminution of immobility in a forced-swim procedure (0.97). Nafadotride, UH232 and AJ76, which show a mild preference for D3 versus D2 sites, blocked the PD128,907 DS, and the modestly-selective D3 antagonist, U99194A, was partially effective. Both nafadotride and U99194A blocked the 7-OH-DPAT DS. However, antagonist potency (n=4) versus PD128,907 correlated better with affinity at D2 (0.89) versus D3 (0.27) sites. Further, whereas the preferential D2 versus D3 antagonist, L741,626, antagonized the PD128,907 DS, the selective D3 antagonists, S11566, S14297 (its eutomer) and GR218,231 were ineffective against PD128907 and 7-OH-DPAT DS. S11566 and GR218,231 likewise did not generalize to PD128,907. In conclusion, under the present conditions, D2 receptors are principally implicated in the DS properties of PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT.     

The discriminative stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists in rats

Rationale  Previous research has found the stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists difficult to distinguish in drug discrimination studies. Antagonism studies suggest that the stimulus effects of both types of agonists may be mediated primarily through D2 receptors. Objectives  The current study was designed to further assess the receptors mediating the stimulus effects of these agonists and to attempt to train rats to discriminate directly between D2- and D3-preferring dopamine agonists. Materials and methods  Four groups of eight rats were trained to discriminate either 0.1 mg/kg of the D3-preferring agonist pramipexole from saline, 1.0 mg/kg of the D2-preferring agonist sumanirole from saline, 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole from either saline or 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole, or 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole from either saline or 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole. Results  Three of eight rats in the 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole vs. 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole or saline failed to meet the training criteria, and the discrimination in this group was tenuous. The D2-preferring antagonist L-741,626 at 1.0 mg/kg was more effective at shifting to the right the pramipexole dose-response curve in pramipexole-trained rats, while 32 mg/kg of the selective D3 antagonist PG01037 had little effect. Quinpirole and 7-OH-DPAT fully or partially substituted for both pramipexole and sumanirole in each group tested, while cocaine did not substitute in any group. Conclusions  Antagonist data along with the pattern of training and substitution data suggested that D2 receptor activation is primarily responsible for the stimulus effects of both sumanirole and pramipexole with D3 receptor activation playing little or no role.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of putative D3 dopamine receptor agonists in rats

Three separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate the putative D3 dopamine receptor agonists (+/-)-7-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT) (0.03 mg/kg), PD 128,907 (1.0 mg/kg) and quinpirole (0.03 mg/kg) from saline. Food was presented after each 10 (7-OH-DPAT and PD 128,907) or 20 (quinpirole) consecutive responses on one lever after administration of the training drug, and the other lever after the administration of saline. Once stable performances were obtained, the effects of various doses of several dopaminergic agonists were assessed during test sessions in which responses on either lever were reinforced. The substitution tests were conducted to determine if differences in potencies would be obtained, which would be suggestive of differences in the mechanisms underlying the discriminative effects of the training drugs. Non-selective agonists with activity at both D2 and D3 dopamine receptors (D2-like agonists) substituted for each of the three training drugs. In addition, the selective D2 dopamine receptor agonist U91356A also generalized to both 7-OH-DPAT and PD 128,907. The potencies of the D2-like agonists in substituting for each training drug were highly correlated with potencies in substituting for the others. SKF 82958 and SKF 81297, agonists with selectivity for D1 and D5 dopamine receptors (D1-like agonists), partially substituted for 7-OH-DPAT but not PD 128,907. The D1-like partial agonist SKF 38393 did not substitute for any of the training drugs for which it was tested. Cocaine produced intermediate substitution in 7-OH-DPAT- and PD 128,907-trained subjects and did not substitute at all in quinpirole-trained subjects. The dopamine D1-like antagonist SCH 39166 (0.001-0.03 mg/kg) did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of PD 128,907, whereas the D2-like dopamine antagonist spiperone (0.001-0.1 mg/kg) produced at the highest dose an insurmountable antagonism of the discriminative effects of PD 128,907. In contrast, there was no appreciable antagonism of the effects of PD 128,907 on response rates. The data collected are consistent with a distinction between the effects of each of these training drugs and the indirectly acting agonist cocaine. Further, these data indicate that there are differences in the mechanisms underlying the discriminative effects of PD 128,907 and its effects on response rates. Moreover, these data indicate that each of the training drugs is distinct from drugs acting through D1 dopaminergic mechanisms. However, there were no data that clearly distinguished these training drugs from each other or from drugs acting through D2 dopaminergic mechanisms.     

Psychomotor-activating effects mediated by dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors in the nucleus accumbens

The contribution made by specific dopamine receptor subtypes to the induction of motor behaviors has not been firmly established. Here, we first characterized the behavioral effects induced by a D(2)-class receptor agonist, bromocriptine, following injections into the nucleus accumbens (Acb). Bromocriptine showed an atypical D(2)-class receptor agonist profile, having no observable effect on a range of motor behaviors. However, when coadministered with the D(1)-class receptor agonist SKF 38393, bromocriptine showed a typical D(2)-class receptor agonist profile, enhancing locomotor activity and suppressing spontaneous yawning. We then administered the dopamine receptor antagonists L-741626 and nafadotride, which possess relative selectivity for D(2) and D(3) receptors, respectively, prior to injections of dopamine agonists into the Acb. Nafadotride significantly reduced the locomotor-enhancing effects elicited by the coadministration of SKF 38393 and the D(2)-class receptor agonist (+)-PD 128907 into the Acb, and also attenuated the effects induced by the combination of SKF 38393 and bromocriptine, although not significantly so. L-741626 mildly attenuated the locomotor effects elicited by both drug combinations. Taken together, these results suggest that both D(2) and D(3) receptors in the Acb contribute to the expression of heightened psychomotor activation.     

Self-administration of agonists selective for dopamine D2, D3, and D4 receptors by rhesus monkeys

Dopamine receptor mechanisms are believed to play a role in the reinforcing effects of cocaine and other drugs of abuse. The lack of receptor-selective agonists has made it difficult to determine the role of the individual dopamine receptors in mediating these reinforcing effects. In this study, rhesus monkeys with a history of intravenous cocaine self-administration were tested for the reinforcing effects of several D(3)-preferring agonists, a D(2)-preferring agonist, and a D(4) agonist. The D(2)-preferring agonist did not maintain responding in any monkeys, and the D(4) agonist was self-administered at low rates, just above those maintained by saline, in one monkey. The D(3)-preferring agonists were self-administered by approximately half of the animals, although at lower rates than cocaine. These results indicate that the apparent limited reinforcing effectiveness of D(2)-like agonists requires activity at D(3) receptors. Previous data from this laboratory and others also suggest that these drugs may not serve as reinforcers directly; the behavior may be maintained by response-contingent delivery of stimuli previously paired with cocaine. The ability of drug-related stimuli to maintain responding apparently differs among monkeys and other organisms, and may be related to individual differences in drug-taking behavior in humans.     

Generalization of serotonin (5-HT)1A agonists and the antipsychotics, clozapine, ziprasidone and S16924, but not haloperidol, to the discriminative stimuli elicited by PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT

Rats were trained to recognize a discriminative stimulus (DS) elicited by the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist, PD128,907 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), which suppressed frontocortical release of dopamine (DA) but not 5-HT. The selective 5-HT1A receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT and flesinoxan, dose-dependently generalized to PD128,907 with effective dose(50)s (ED50s) of 0.08 and 1.5mg/kg, s.c., respectively, and inhibited the release and synthesis of 5-HT but not of DA. The 'atypical' antipsychotic, clozapine, which displays weak partial agonist properties at 5-HT1A receptors, dose-dependently, though partially, generalized to PD128,907 (50%, 2.5mg/kg, s.c.). Further, S16924 and ziprasidone, which in a like manner, display partial agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors, generalized with ED50s of 0.6 and 2.3mg/kg, s.c., respectively. In contrast, haloperidol, which is devoid of affinity at 5-HT1A sites, was inactive. At doses equivalent to those generalizing to PD128,907, clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone reduced serotonergic (but not dopaminergic) transmission, whereas haloperidol was inactive. In rats trained to recognize a further D2/D3 agonist, 7-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.), generalization was obtained similarly with 8-OH-DPAT (ED50 = 0.07 mg/kg, s.c.), flesinoxan (3.4) and clozapine (0.6), but not with haloperidol. In conclusion, although PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT do not directly interact with 5-HT1A receptors or influence serotonergic transmission, their DS properties are mimicked by 5-HT1A receptor agonists at doses activating 5-HT1A but not D2/D3 (auto)receptors. These observations likely account for generalization of clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone to PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT inasmuch as they behave as antagonists at D2/D3 receptors, yet agonists at 5-HT1A (auto)receptors.     

Dopaminergic D2-like agonists produce yawning in the myelin mutant taiep and Sprague-Dawley rats

Systemic administration of D2-like dopaminergic-receptor agonists increases yawning behavior. However, only a few studies have been done in animals with pathological conditions. The taiep rat is a myelin mutant with an initial hypomyelination followed by progressive demyelination, being the brainstem one of the most affected areas. In our experiments, we analyzed the effects of systemic administration of the D2-family agonists and antagonists on yawning behavior, and correlated them with the lipid myelin content in the brainstem and other areas in the central nervous system (CNS) in 8 month old male taiep and Sprague-Dawley rats. Subjects were maintained under standard conditions in Plexiglas cages with a 12:12 light-dark cycle, lights on at 0700 and free access to rodent pellets and tap water. Drugs were freshly prepared injected ip at 0800 and subjects were observed for 60 min. When antagonists were used it was administered 15 min before the agonist. Sprague-Dawley and taiep rats significantly increased their yawning frequency after systemic injection of (−)-quinpirole hydrochloride, R(+)-7-Hydroxy-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (7-OH-DPAT) or trans-(±)-3,4,4a,10b-tetrahydro-4-propyl-2H,5H-[1]benzopyrano [4,3-b]-1,4-oxazin-9-ol hydrochloride ((±)-PD 128,907). Among D2-like agonists used higher effects are obtained with (−)-quinpirole. The effects caused by (−)-quinpirole can be reduced by (−)-sulpiride; and yawning caused by 7-OH-DPAT was decreased by tiapride only in taiep rats. In Sprague-Dawley only (−)-sulpiride is able to decrease (−)-quinpirole-caused yawning. In conclusion, dopaminergic D2-like agonists are still able to cause yawning despite the severe myelin loss in taiep rats. Similarly, patients with various CNS illnesses that affect myelin, such as stroke or multiple sclerosis, are able to yawn suggesting that trigger neurons are still able to command this innate behavior.     

Modulatory effects of dopamine D3/2 agonists on kappa opioid-induced antinociception and diuresis in the rat

RATIONALE: The dopamine (DA) D3/2 agonist 7-OH-DPAT has been shown to attenuate the behavioral effects of the mu agonist morphine as well as the development of morphine tolerance. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of DA D3/2 agonists [7-OH-DPAT, (+)-PD128,907, quinelorane, (-)-quinpirole], a D1 agonist (SKF38393), a D1 antagonist [(+)-SCH23390], a DA antagonist (spiperone), and an indirect DA agonist (cocaine) on the antinociceptive effects of kappa agonists (spiradoline, U69,593, bremazocine) as well as the effects of D3/2 agonists on the diuretic effects of spiradoline. METHODS: Antinociception was determined using a warm water (50-55 degrees C) tail-withdrawal procedure and urine output was collected over a 2-h interval. RESULTS: The antinociceptive effects produced by the kappa agonists varied with the intensity of the nociceptive stimulus (water), as maximal or near maximal effects were obtained with spiradoline at 55 degrees C, U69,593 at 52 degrees C, and bremazocine at 50 degrees C water. 7-OH-DPAT produced a dose-dependent attenuation of the antinociceptive effects of spiradoline, U69,593, and bremazocine. Spiperone completely reversed the effects of 7-OH-DPAT on spiradoline antinociception. (+)-PD128,907 and quinelorane, but not (-)-quinpirole or the other DAergic agents examined, attenuated the antinociceptive effects of spiradoline in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The diuretic effects of spiradoline were attenuated by 7-OH-DPAT, (+)-PD128,907, quinelorane, and (-)-quinpirole, and this attenuation was reversed by spiperone. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that some D3/2 agonists can modulate both the antinociceptive and diuretic effects of kappa agonists. These modulatory actions are similar to those obtained against the effects of mu agonists.     

Comparative pharmacology of human dopamine D(2)-like receptor stable cell lines coupled to calcium flux through Galpha(qo5)

The goal of this study was to develop a new approach to study the pharmacology of the dopamine D(4) receptor that could be used in comparative studies with dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors. Stable HEK-293 cell lines co-expressing recombinant human D(2L), D(3) or D(4) receptors along with Galpha(qo5) cDNA were prepared. Dopamine induced a robust, transient calcium signal in these cell lines with EC(50)s for D(2L), D(3) and D(4) of 18.0, 11.9 and 2.2 nM, respectively. Reported D(4)-selective agonists CP226269 and PD168077 were potent, partial D(4) agonists exhibiting 31-1700-fold selectivity for D(4) over D(3) or D(2). Non-selective D(2)-like agonists apomorphine and quinpirole showed full efficacy but did not discriminate across the three receptors. D(3)-selective agonists 7-hydroxy-DPAT and PD128907 were potent but non-selective D(2)-like agonists. The reported D(3) partial agonist BP-897 exhibited minimal agonist activity at D(3) but was a potent D(3) antagonist and a partial D(4) agonist. Other D(2)-like antagonists, haloperidol, clozapine, and domperidone showed concentration-dependent inhibition of dopamine responses at all three receptors with K(i) ranging from 0.05 to 48.3 nM. The D(3) selective antagonist S33084 and D(4)-selective antagonist L-745870 were highly selective for D(3) and D(4) receptors with K(b) of 0.7 and 0.1 nM, respectively. Stable co-expression of D(2)-like receptors with chimeric Galpha(qo5) proteins in HEK-293 cells is an efficient method to study receptor activation in a common cellular background and an efficient method for direct comparison of ligand affinity and efficacy across human D(2L), D(3) and D(4) receptors.     

Effect of the D1 receptor agonist SKF 38393 on some behavioural effects of apomorphine in rats

Summary The dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine in experiments on rats in low doses (0.025–0.2 mg/kg, s.c.) induced yawning which reflected a selective activation of presynaptic dopamine receptors. In high doses (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) apomorphine induced stereotyped sniffing and yawning in consequence of postsynaptic D 2 receptor activation. Dopamine D 1 receptor agonist SKF 38393 inhibited yawning induced by low doses of apomorphine. The inhibitory effect of SKF 38393 on apomorphine-induced yawning was attenuated by pretreatment with specific D I receptor antagonist SCH 23390 [2-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1 H-3-benzazepine-7-ol]. On the other hand however, SKF 38393 potentiated sniffing induced by the high doses of apomorphine without affecting gnawing. These data indicate that D 1 receptor activation modulates both pre- and postsynaptic effects of apomorphine in opposite directions.     

Effects of stimulation of putative dopamine autoreceptors on electroencephalographic power spectrum in comparison with effects produced by blockade of postsynaptic dopamine receptors in rats

Alterations in cortical EEG activity in male rats produced by putative agonists at dopamine (DA) autoreceptors and by antagonists at postsynaptic DA receptors were compared in order to study, whether an impairment in dopaminergic neurotransmission via two different mechanisms might result in similar or different effects. Simultaneously to the EEG recordings, gross behaviour was observed. Putative agonists at DA autoreceptors (apomorphine 0.05 mg/kg, quinpirole 0.05 mg/kg, or talipexole 0.02 mg/kg s.c.) produced increases in the power iin all of the frequency bands, except beta-2, with the most pronounced increase in the delta band. These EEG alterations were accompanied by hypokinesia, ptosis and yawning. In contrast, antagonists at DA receptors (haloperidol 0.1 mg/kg i.p., D₂ blocker) or SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg i.p., D₁ blocker) led to little increases in the delta band, but more pronounced increases in the alpha-2 band. Behavioural signs were hypokinesia, but little ptosis and yawning. The combination of both blockers produced, in addition, strong increases in the delta band and behavioural signs of ptosis and yawning. These results suggest that activation of putative dopamine autoreceptors produced EEG patterns and behavioural patterns different from those produced by blockade of either D₁ or D₂ postsynaptic dopamine receptors. In contrast, the effects following a stimulation of putative DA autoreceptors, which are expected to decrease the release of the agonist and its action at postsynaptic D₁ and D₂ receptors, were very similar to those found after a combined blockade of both types of postsynaptic dopamine receptors.     

Antagonism of drug-induced yawning and penile erections in rats

A number of centrally active drugs were tested for antagonism of physostigmine- or apomorphine-induced yawning and for apomorphine-induced penile erections. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists piperoxan and idazoxan inhibited the yawning response without affecting the penile erections. The 5HT agonist quipazine and the histamine antagonist dexchlorpheniramine inhibited the yawning response more effectively than the penile erections. Dexchlorpheniramine even enhanced the apomorphine-induced penile erections and induced penile erections in physostigmine-treated rats. The 5HT antagonists metergoline and methysergide blocked the apomorphine-induced penile erections without affecting the yawning response. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, the dopamine antagonist sulpiride, the antihistaminic mepyramine and the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide inhibited both yawning and penile erections at the same dose level. The alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists prazosin and phenoxybenzamine were inactive. It is concluded that yawning and penile erections can be differentially affected by drug treatments. Also, while concomitant yawning and penile erections can be selectively induced by a class of dopamine receptor agonists, the same selectivity does not apply to antagonism of these induced behaviours.     

Role of dopamine receptors in the dual effect of naloxone on quinpirole-induced yawning in morphine pretreated rats

Summary The present study was undertaken to determine the state of sensitivity of dopamine D2/133 receptors involved in the mediation of yawning behaviour at various times following acute morphine administration to rats. Morphine (3.0 mg/kg, s.c.) induced a biphasic effect on locomotor activity: an initial inhibitory phase lasting for about 30 min was after about an hour followed by a phase of locomotor activation lasting for about 60 min. Dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole (0.01–0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) induced yawning behaviour in rats. Morphine given at 15 or 60 min before (inhibitory phase) inhibited the yawning response to quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg) but not when given at 90 or 120 min before (stimulatory phase). Naloxone (1.0 mg/kg) given 10 min before quinpirole restored yawning inhibited by morphine pretreatment during the inhibitory phase (15–60 min after morphine). However, during the morphine-induced stimulatory phase naloxone strongly inhibited the yawning response to quinpirole. D 1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 [R-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol hemimaleate] at 0.01 mg/ kg did not affect quinpirole-induced yawning or its inhibition by morphine. However, in rats which received morphine 90 min prior to testing yawning, SCH 23390 enhanced quinpirole-induced yawning behaviour as compared with morphine- or saline-pretreated animals. The data obtained in the present study indicate that morphine pretreatment initially induces a lack of responsiveness of the D2/D3 receptors mediating yawning behaviour and subsequently increases their sensitivity. However, the behavioural expression of hypersensitivity of these receptors seems to be attenuated by the concomitant activation of D1 receptors after morphine pretreatment, and thus the enhanced response to quinpirole is first seen after blockade of D1 receptors. Correspondence to L. Ahtee at the above address     

Intra-accumbens infusion of D(3) receptor agonists reduces spontaneous and dopamine-induced locomotion

The present study investigated whether PD 128907 and 7-OH-DPAT, described as preferential dopamine (DA) D(3) receptor agonists, produce hypolocomotion by acting at postsynaptic dopaminergic receptors within the nucleus accumbens. Bilateral infusion of PD 128907 (1.5 and 3 microg/0.5 microl) induced a dose-dependent hypolocomotion, whereas its enantiomer, PD 128908, was inactive. Local infusion of 7-OH-DPAT and the preferential DA autoreceptor agonist, B-HT 920, at the same dose range also decreased spontaneous locomotion. In addition, both drugs induced yawning with B-HT 920 producing the greatest effect. In the second experiment, the ability of these agonists to reduce the locomotor activity induced by intra-accumbens injection of DA (10 microg/0.5 microl) was studied. Pretreatment with either PD 128907 or 7-OH-DPAT (3 microg) reduced DA-induced hyperactivity. Local infusion of B-HT 920 (3 microg) failed to antagonise the locomotor effects of DA. Altogether these findings suggest that PD 128907 and 7-OH-DPAT induce hypolocomotion by acting in part at postsynaptic DA receptors. The possible role of D(2) and/or D(3) receptors in the mediation of these effects is discussed.     

The anti-influenza drug oseltamivir evokes hypothermia in mice through dopamine D2 receptor activation via central actions

Oseltamivir has a hypothermic effect in mice when injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) and intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.). Here we show that the hypothermia evoked by i.c.v.-oseltamivir is inhibited by non-selective dopamine receptor antagonists (sulpiride and haloperidol) and the D₂-selective antagonist L-741,626, but not by D₁/D₅-selective and D₃-selective antagonists (SCH-23390 and SB-277011-A, respectively). The hypothermic effect of i.p.-administered oseltamivir was not inhibited by sulpiride, haloperidol, L-741,626 and SCH-23390. In addition, neither sulpiride, haloperidol nor SCH-23390 blocked hypothermia evoked by i.c.v.-administered oseltamivir carboxylate (a hydrolyzed metabolite of oseltamivir). These results suggest that oseltamivir in the brain induces hypothermia through activation of dopamine D₂ receptors.     

Analysis of D2 and D3 receptor-selective ligands in rats trained to discriminate cocaine from saline.

This study examined the role of dopamine D3 receptors in the stimulus generalization produced by 7-OH-DPAT and PD 128907 in rats trained to discriminate cocaine from saline. Twelve male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg) from saline in a two-choice operant procedure using a FR20 schedule of water reinforcement. Stimulus generalization tests were administered with the D3-preferring agonists (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), (+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), and PD 128907 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), and the selective D2 agonist PNU-39156 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg). Complete generalization to cocaine was observed with (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT at doses that markedly suppressed response rate. Only partial stimulus generalization was observed with (+)-7-OH-DPAT and PD 128907 when these compounds were administered intraperitoneally, although subcutaneous injections of these compounds produced complete substitution. Response rate was also significantly reduced by these compounds. The selective D2 agonist, PNU-91356 also fully substituted for the cocaine cue and suppressed response rate in a dose-dependent manner. To ascertain the importance of D3 receptor actions in the stimulus generalization produced by (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg) and PD-128907 (0.3 mg/kg), the fairly selective D3 antagonist, PNU-99194A (2.5-20 mg/kg) was also tested in combination with these compounds. Although PNU-99194A partially attenuated the stimulus generalization produced by (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT, it failed to block PD-128907 substitution for cocaine. These results indicate at least some involvement of D3 receptors in the stimulus effects of (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT, although further investigations are clearly warranted. The present results also suggest that the cue properties of cocaine may be dissociated from the locomotor activating effects of this drug, because D3/D2 receptor agonists suppress locomotor activity but produce stimulus generalization to cocaine.     

Modulation of the locomotor responses induced by D1-like and D2-like dopamine receptor agonists and D-amphetamine by NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptor agonists and antagonists in the core of the rat nucleus accumbens

Dopamine and glutamate interactions in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) play a crucial role in both the development of a motor response suitable for the environment and in the mechanisms underlying the motor-activating properties of psychostimulant drugs such as amphetamine. We investigated the effects of the infusion in the NAcc of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor agonists and antagonists on the locomotor responses induced by the selective D(1)-like receptor agonist SKF 38393, the selective D(2)-like receptor agonist quinpirole, alone or in combination, and D-amphetamine. Infusion of either the NMDA receptor agonist NMDA, the NMDA receptor antagonist D-AP5, the non-NMDA receptor antagonist CNQX, or the non-NMDA receptor agonist AMPA resulted in an increase in basal motor activity. Conversely, all of these ionotropic glutamate (iGlu) receptor ligands reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by focal infusion of D-amphetamine. Interactions with dopamine receptor activation were not so clear: (i). infusion of NMDA and D-AP5 respectively enhanced and reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by the infusion of the D(1)-like receptor agonist of SKF 38393, while AMPA or CNQX decreased it; (ii). infusion of NMDA, D-AP5, and CNQX reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by co-injection of SKF 38393+quinpirole--a pharmacological condition thought to activate both D(1)-like and D(2)-like presynaptic and postsynaptic receptors, while infusion of AMPA potentiated it; (iii). infusion of either NMDA, D-AP5 or CNQX, but not of AMPA, potentiated the decrease in motor activity induced by the D(2)-like receptor agonist quinpirole, a compound believed to act only at presynaptic D(2)-like receptors when injected by itself. Our results show that NMDA receptors have an agonist action with D(1)-like receptors and an antagonist action with D(2)-like receptors, while non-NMDA receptors have the opposite action. This is discussed from a anatamo-functional point of view.     

Yawning is elicited by D2 dopamine agonists but is blocked by the D1 antagonist,SCH 23390

The subtype of dopamine (DA) receptors mediating the yawning response to DA agonists was determined in rats. Yawning was elicited both by the mixed D₁–D₂ agonist apomorphine and by the specific D₂ agonist LY 171555, but not by the selective D₁ agonist SKF 38393. Both apomorphine- and LY 171555-induced yawning were antagonized not only by the selective D₂ antagonist sulpiride but, unexpectedly, also by the selective D₁ antagonist SCH 23390. The results suggest that DA receptors mediating the yawning response are of the D₂ type, and that these receptors are connected with D₁ receptors in such a way that the blockade of the latter results in the functional inactivation of the former.     

The effects of dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor agonists on body temperature in male mice

The effect of dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor stimulation on body temperature has been investigated in male mice. The selective D-2 receptor agonists, quinpirole and LY 163502, and the mixed D-1/D-2 agonist, apomorphine, induced a dose-dependent hypothermia, whereas the selective D-1 receptor agonists, SK&F 81297, SK&F 38393 and SK&F 75670, induced hyperthermia. The hyperthermic responses of these agents were of a similar magnitude although the relative efficacies determined in vitro with the adenylate cyclase assay were different. The peripherally acting D-1 agonist, fenoldopam, did not influence body temperature, indicating that the hyperthermia is mediated, centrally. Studies with combinations of quinpirole and SK&F 38393 showed that the effect of one of the substances could be counteracted by the other. Furthermore, antagonist studies showed that the hypothermia induced by quinpirole could be inhibited by the D-2-selective antagonist, YM 09151-2, and by the mixed D-1/D-2 antagonist, cis(Z)-flupentixol, but not by the D-1-selective antagonist, SCH 23390. Similar results were found for apomorphine-induced hypothermia. SK&F 38393-induced hyperthermia could be antagonized by all three antagonists. These results suggest that the two receptor subtypes act differentially on body temperature, and that they influence a common out-put system, but in opposite directions. These findings are opposite to those of behavioural studies, where a synergistic function of D-1 and D-2 receptors has been demonstrated in the regulation of motor function.     

Muscarinic and nicotinic effects on yawning and tongue protruding in the rat

Physostigmine, an anticholinesterase agent, elicited yawning with a marked protrusion of the tongue and teeth chattering. Yawning and chattering were also observed after pilocarpine, a cholinergic agonist predominantly acting upon muscarinic receptors. Apomorphine at low doses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg), which preferentially activates presynaptic dopamine autoreceptors, elicited yawning, whereas at high doses (1-2 mg/kg) it produced stereotypy. Yawning induced by both cholinergic agonists and apomorphine was inhibited by scopolamine, a muscarinic receptor blocking agent, but not by methylscopolamine, a peripheral anticholinergic agent and mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor blocking agent. Low dose (0.02 mg/kg) of haloperidol, which has been reported to block presynaptic dopamine autoreceptors, inhibited apomorphine-induced yawning but did not affect cholinergic agonist-induced yawning. Physostigmine-elicited tongue protruding was inhibited by mecamylamine. The results imply that yawning behavior is essentially associated with the stimulation of central muscarinic receptors, and that physostigmine also induces tongue protruding by activating the central nicotinic receptors.