Colorectal cancer surgical care and survival: do private health insurance,socioeconomic and locational status make a difference?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present paper was to examine patterns of surgical care and the likelihood of death within 5 years after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, including the effects of demographic, locational and socioeconomic disadvantage and the possession of private health insurance. METHODS: The Western Australian Data Linkage System was used to extract all hospital morbidity, cancer and death records for people with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer from 1982 to 2001. Demographic, hospital and private health insurance information was available for all years and measures of socioeconomic and locational disadvantage from 1991. A logistic regression model estimated the probability of receiving colorectal surgery. A Cox regression model estimated the likelihood of death from any cause within 5 years of diagnosis. RESULTS: People were more likely to undergo colorectal surgery if they were younger, had less comorbidity and were married/defacto or divorced. People with a first admission to a private hospital (odds ratio (OR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-1.48) or with private health insurance (OR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14-1.42) were more likely to undergo surgery. Living in a rural or remote area made little difference, but a first admission to a rural hospital reduced the likelihood of surgery (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.87). Residency in lower socioeconomic areas also made no difference to the likelihood of having surgical treatment. The likelihood of death from any cause was lower in those who were younger, had less comorbidity, were elective admissions and underwent surgery. Residency in lower socioeconomic status and rural areas, admission to a rural hospital or a private hospital and possession of private health insurance had no effect on the likelihood of death. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that socioeconomic and locational status and access to private health care had no significant effects on surgical patterns of care in people with colorectal cancer. However, despite the higher rates of surgery in the private hospitals and among those with private health insurance, their survival was no better.     

Rural-urban differences in the presentation, management and survival of breast cancer in Western Australia

From all women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 1999 in Western Australia, rural and urban women were compared with regard to mode of detection, tumour characteristics at presentation, diagnostic investigations, treatment and survival. Women from rural areas with breast cancer (n=206, 23%) were less likely to have open biopsy with frozen section (P<0.001), breast-conserving surgery (P<0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (P=0.004) and hormonal therapy (P=0.03), and were less likely to be treated by a high caseload breast cancer surgeon (P<0.001). Adjusting for age and tumour characteristics, rural women had an increased likelihood of death within 5 years of breast cancer diagnosis (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.38). This difference was not significant after adjustment for treatment factors (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.90-2.04).     

Patterns of Surgical Treatment for Women Diagnosed with Early Breast Cancer in Queensland

BACKGROUND: Australian women with early breast cancer should be given the choice between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. This is the first Australian study to report on patterns of surgical care specifically for early breast cancer at a population level. METHODS: Two population-based routine data collections were linked to obtain surgical treatment information for breast cancer cases diagnosed in 2004 in Queensland, from which we identified 1274 cases of early female breast cancer. Logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of female breast cancer patients having mastectomy, BCS, and axillary node dissection, after adjusting for patient and hospital demographics, tumor size, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Three-quarters (77%) of women had BCS, 29% had a mastectomy, and 86% had dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The likelihood of women having mastectomy was higher among women living in rural areas, those treated in public hospitals, and women who had comorbidities of anemia or heart failure. In contrast, BCS was more likely for women treated in private hospitals or hospitals with high surgical caseload. Heart failure decreased the likelihood of BCS. Having an axillary node dissection was more likely among younger women and those treated in high caseload hospitals. CONCLUSION: The observed differentials in surgical treatment for early breast cancer patients suggest that access issues may have contributed to the decision-making process. Understanding the reasons why women with early breast cancer choose a certain treatment strategy should be a focus of future research.     

Patterns of care analysis among women with ductal carcinoma in situ in North Carolina

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast comprises approximately 25% of new breast cancer cases. The aim of this study was to delineate patterns of care for women with DCIS as related to age, tumor characteristics, and race/ethnicity. Further study goals included the identification of predictors of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), adjuvant radiation, and/or hormonal therapy, as well as breast reconstruction after mastectomy. METHODS: The North Carolina Cancer Registry was queried for primary DCIS treated in 1998 and 1999 (n = 1,893). Logistic regression analysis was performed to define the determinants of patterns of care. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of the women in this study sample underwent mastectomy. Positive predictors of mastectomy included young age (age <50 y vs 70+; odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.11) and larger tumor size (>2 mm vs 0-1 mm; OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.63-3.60). Approximately 48% of women who underwent BCS received adjuvant radiation therapy. Factors associated with receiving radiation therapy after BCS include younger age (age <50 vs 70+; OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.49-3.03). Approximately 19% of women who underwent BCS received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Positive predictors of receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy after BCS included age of 50 to 60 years versus 70+ (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.36-3.44) and the receipt of radiation therapy (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.55-5.06). Approximately 28% of women who underwent mastectomy received breast reconstruction surgery. Positive predictors of breast reconstruction after mastectomy included age younger than 50 years versus 70+ years (OR, 47.36; 95% CI, 19.45-115.32). African American race was associated negatively with receipt of breast reconstruction after mastectomy (OR, .46; 95% CI, .26-.84). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies for primary surgical therapy for DCIS vary significantly by age. Inconsistencies exist surrounding the use of adjuvant radiation therapy after BCS in women with DCIS. Variations in approaches to reconstructive surgery after mastectomy may be related to age, ethnicity, and/or economic constraints.     

Mortality impact of less-than-standard therapy in older breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) only, BCS plus radiation therapy (RT), mastectomy, and the receipt of adjuvant tamoxifen in a large population-based cohort of older women with early-stage disease. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study was conducted within six US integrated health-care delivery systems. Automated administrative databases, medical records, and tumor registries were used to identify women aged 65 years or older who received BCS or mastectomy to treat stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1994. We compared cause-specific 10-year mortality rates across treatment categories by fitting Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographics and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 1,837 women having operations for stage I or II breast cancer. Compared with women receiving mastectomy, those receiving BCS without RT were twice as likely to die of breast cancer (adjusted hazards ratio [HR]=2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51 to 3.18). Breast cancer mortality rates were similar between women receiving BCS plus RT and women receiving mastectomy (adjusted HR=1.08, 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.48). In the subset of 886 chemotherapy-naive women treated with tamoxifen, those treated with tamoxifen for less than 1 year had a substantially higher breast cancer mortality rate than those exposed 5 years or more (adjusted HR=6.26, 95% CI, 3.10 to 12.64). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that older women receiving BCS alone have higher rates of breast cancer death than those receiving BCS + RT or mastectomy and that the survival benefit from tamoxifen increases with increasing duration of treatment.     

Private insurance is the strongest predictor of women receiving breast conservation surgery for breast cancer

Background

It is widely accepted that mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with irradiation yield similar results, yet many women continue to receive mastectomy. This study evaluates factors contributing to surgical decision-making in breast cancer. Registry data were obtained on all patients treated at the Southwest Cancer Treatment and Research Center (SWCTRC) between 2002 and 2006. Patient demographics, including age and race, and insurance type, tumor characteristics, surgical procedure performed, lymph node status, stage, adjuvant therapy, and outcome were analyzed against mastectomy versus BCS using bivariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

There was a higher proportion of uninsured patients in the mastectomy cohort, which also included more patients with later stage disease, larger tumor size, and a higher number of lymph node metastases. The only independent predictors of BCS were fewer lymph node metastases and having insurance. Patients with private insurance were almost 4 times more likely to receive BCS (odds ratio 3.90, 95% confidence interval 1.20-12.67).

Conclusions

Insurance status is an important predictor determining whether a patient receives BCS or mastectomy for breast cancer.     

Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the trend of breast conservation surgery (BCS) in North Carolina over a 6-year period and to identify patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with the use of BCS. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite evidence that BCS is an appropriate method of treatment for early stage breast cancer, surgeons in the United States have been slow to adopt this treatment method. METHODS: Cases of primary breast cancer surgery in all 157 hospitals in the state from 1988 to 1993, inclusive (N = 20,760), were obtained from the State Medical Database Commission, Area Resource File, American Hospital Association and State Board of Medical Examiner's Databases. Multiple logistic regression was used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine factors associated with BCS. RESULTS: The rate of BCS doubled from 7.3% in 1988 to 14.3% in 1993, with an overall rate of 10.2% (2117/ 20.760). Multiple logistic regression identified the following factors associated with BCS: patient age younger than 50 years of age (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.4, 2.1), patient age 50 to 69 years of age (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1, 1.4), private insurance (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0, 1.4), hospital bed size 401+(OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.6, 2.5), bed size 101 to 400 (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.3, 2.1), and surgeon graduation from medical school since 1981 (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2, 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of BCS in North Carolina are low. Least likely to have BCS were women older than 70 years of age, without private insurance, treated at small hospitals by older surgeons. To increase the use of BCS, widespread education of surgeons, other health care providers, policy makers, and the general public is warranted.     

Low use of breast conservation surgery in medically indigent populations

BACKGROUND: Breast conservation surgery (BCS) with radiation is an acceptable treatment for early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: Data were obtained from hospital cancer registries on women surgically treated for Stage 0 to II breast cancer from 1993 to 1997. Data on 1,747 patients were analyzed for surgical treatment, hospital type (private versus public), disease stage, and ethnic origin. RESULTS: In this study, 34% of women received BCS. Women treated in private hospitals received BCS more often than women treated in public hospitals. Women with stage II disease received BCS less often than women with earlier stage disease. Hospital type (public versus private) and disease stage were strong, independent predictors for use of BCS. When hospital type and disease stage were statistically controlled, no treatment differences across ethnic groups were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Use of BCS in this study was low compared with National Cancer Database statistics. Women treated in publicly funded hospitals and those with stage II disease were significantly less likely to receive BCS.     

Patterns of Surgical Treatment for Women with Breast Cancer in Relation to Age

Abstract: Although treatment recommendations have been advocated for all women with early breast cancer regardless of age, it is generally accepted that different treatments are preferred based on the age of the patient. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of breast cancer surgery after adjusting for other major prognostic factors in relation to patient age. Data on cancer characteristics and surgical procedures in 31,298 patients with early breast cancer reported to the National Breast Cancer Audit between 1999 and 2006 were used for the study. There was a close association between age and surgical treatment pattern after adjusting for other prognostic factors, including tumor size, histologic grade, number of tumors, lymph node positivity, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and extensive intraduct component. Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) was highest among women aged ≤40 years (OR = 1.140; 95% CI: 1.004–1.293) compared to women aged 51–70 years (reference group). BCS was lowest in women aged >70 years (OR = 0.498, 95% CI: 0.455–0.545). Significantly more women aged ≤50 years underwent more than one operation for breast conservation (20.4–24.8%) compared with women aged >50 years (11.4–17.0%). Women aged >70 years were more likely to receive no surgical treatment, 3.5% versus 1.0–1.3% in all other age groups (≤40, 41–50 51–70 years). There is an association between patient age and the type of breast cancer surgery for women in Australia and New Zealand. Women age ≤40 years are more likely to undergo BCS despite having adverse histologic features and have more than one procedure to achieve breast conservation. Older women (>70 years) more commonly undergo mastectomy and are more likely to receive no surgical treatment.     

A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservative surgery

BACKGROUND: There are a variety of surgical choices for women with early-stage breast cancer, including breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, or mastectomy plus reconstructive surgery. This report examines some of the factors that affect these choices and the costs of the various treatment options. METHODS: Data from the Virginia Cancer Registry were linked to insurance claims from the Trigon Blue Cross and Blue Shield Company for women with local and regional staged breast cancer from 1989 to 1991 in Virginia. Multivariate analyses and cost studies were performed. RESULTS: There were 592 women who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS, 26%), mastectomy (58%), or mastectomy plus reconstruction (16%). Increasing age reduced the use of reconstruction. The choice of reconstruction was not affected by tumor size, nodal status, or race. Sixty percent of women had immediate breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy; the majority had the implant procedure. The cost of BCS ($21,582) was higher than that of mastectomy ($16,122, P < .01). The costs for BCS and mastectomy were significantly lower than for mastectomy plus reconstruction ($31,047, P < .05). The 2-year cost for immediate reconstruction was $8200 less than for delayed procedures and was similar to the cost of BCS. CONCLUSIONS: Age was the driving force in reconstruction decisions. Clinical factors such as tumor size and nodal status were more important for the choice between BCS and mastectomy. There are significant cost differences between the various procedures. For a similar cosmetic outcome, BCS is less expensive than breast reconstruction. When reconstruction is required, a simultaneous procedure is less expensive.     

Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the US according to Health Insurance Status

Although standard practice guidelines for breast cancer are clear, the interplay between insurance and practice patterns for the US is poorly defined. This study was performed to test for associations between patient insurance status and presentation of breast cancer as well as local therapy patterns in the US, via a large national dataset. We queried the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data base for breast cancer cases diagnosed from 2007 to 2011 in women aged 18–64 with nonmetastatic ductal/lobular cancers, treated surgically. We tested for associations between insurance status (insured/Medicaid/uninsured) and choice of surgical procedure (mastectomy/breast conserving surgery [BCS]), omission of radiotherapy (RT) following BCS, and administration of post‐mastectomy radiation (PMRT). There were 129,565 patients with localized breast cancer analyzed. The health insurance classification included insured (84.5%), Medicaid (11.5%), uninsured (2.1%) and unknown (1.9%). Medicaid or uninsured status was associated with large, node positive tumors, black race, and low income. The BCS rate varied by insurance status: insured (52.2%), uninsured (47.7%), and Medicaid (45.2%), p < 0.001. In multivariable analysis, Medicaid insurance remained significantly associated with receipt of mastectomy (OR [95% CI] = 1.07 [1.03–1.11]), while RT was more frequently omitted after BCS in both Medicaid (OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [1.07–1.21]) and uninsured (OR [95% CI] = 1.29 [1.14–1.47]) patients. Insurance status was associated with significant variations in breast cancer care in the US. Although patient choice cannot be determined from this dataset, departure from standard of care is associated with specific types of insurance coverage. Further investigation into the reasons for these departures is strongly suggested.     

The Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer in the Elderly: A Single Institution Comparative Review of 5235 Patients with 1028 Patients ≥70 years

Abstract: As the wave of the baby boomers shifts the age demographic of patients, the current surgical management of breast cancer in elderly women (≥70 years of age) becomes relevant because deviation from standard treatment often occurs in this group. The purpose of this study was to determine the operative mortality when treated with standard surgical procedures and to investigate trends in the surgical management of breast cancer in the elderly. A total of 5,235 patients undergoing either mastectomy or breast conservation surgery (BCS) for invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were identified in a retrospective review of a prospectively accrued data base between the years of 1994 and 2007 at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Of the 5,235 patients, 1,028 (20%) patients were ≥70 years of age. The 30‐day and 90‐day mortality in the elderly group (age ≥70 years) was 0.2% (95% CI 0.02–0.7%) and 0.7% (95% CI 0.3–1.4%), respectively. The 30‐day and 90‐day mortality among patients <70 years was 0 and 0.05% (2 of 4,207 patients) (95% CI 0.005–0.2), respectively. BCS rates for invasive carcinomas were the highest for patients between 40 and 70 years of age, whereas the mastectomy rates were higher among patients <40 years of age (53%). Elderly women were as likely as women <40 years to have BCS for invasive carcinoma (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8–1.5), but more likely to have BCS for DCIS (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3). Surgical mortality in elderly women treated for breast cancer was extremely low and was related to the extent of surgery performed. Breast cancer treatment differed by age groups.     

Do women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and consulting surgeon assess decision-making equally?

This study assesses the perception of the decision-making process of 25 surgeons and 194 patients (aged 21-81 years) who had newly diagnosed breast cancer and had to undergo mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The majority of women wanted to participate in decision-making. When it was medically possible to give a choice between BCS and mastectomy, only 59% of women received a choice. The main reason that 11% of the women went against surgeon's recommendations was fear of cancer recurrence. The most influential factors for women were the surgeon's recommendation, and fear of cancer recurrence. Medical assessment and the cosmetic result were the most influential factors for the surgeons. Female surgeons were more influenced by their assessment of the women's need for security, than male. In conclusion, not all women who are eligible for BCS receive an option. Women and surgeons emphasize influencing factors differently. The surgeon's gender was found to influence recommendation given.     

Predictors of Re-excision among Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer

Background Up to 60% of breast cancer patients who undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS) require re-excision to obtain clear margins, causing delays in adjuvant treatment and poor aesthetic results. However, patient and treatment-related factors associated with re-excision are not well defined. Methods We surveyed all women undergoing breast conserving surgery between January 2002 and May 2006 regarding their breast disease (n = 714, response rate = 79.5%). The medical record was reviewed to determine the receipt of re-excision lumpectomy following BCS, and obtain tumor stage, histology, and biopsy method (surgical versus needle biopsy). Patient age, breast size, tumor location in the breast, and receipt of chemotherapy were self-reported. Logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of re-excision lumpectomy. Results In this sample, 51.4% of women required only one breast excision, 41.9% required two breast excisions, and 6.6% required three breast excisions. Overall, 10.8% of women required a mastectomy following initial attempt at BCS. Factors significantly correlated with re-excision lumpectomy included smaller breast size (A cup: OR = 2.7; 95%CI: 1.32–5.52; B cup: 1.63; 95%CI: 1.02–2.62), lobular histology (OR = 1.93; 95%CI: 1.15–3.25), and receipt of surgical biopsy (OR = 3.35; 95%CI: 2.24–5.02). Women who received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 2.49; 95%CI: 1.19–5.22) were more likely to require re-excision compared with women who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions Re-excision lumpectomy is common, and is significantly correlated with smaller breast size, lobular histology, surgical biopsy, and chemotherapy timing. Attention to these risk factors can improve the quality of care delivered to BCS patients by decreasing the cost and morbidity associated with multiple re-excision procedures.     

Survival after Breast‐Conserving Surgery with Whole Breast or Partial Breast Irradiation in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer: A SEER Data‐base Analysis

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated equivalency in survival outcomes for early stage breast cancer patients treated with either mastectomy or breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation. Recent, state‐level data confirm comparable survival outcomes. Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Research (SEER) data, we sought to evaluate survival outcomes among patients with early stage breast cancer treated with mastectomy, BCS with whole breast irradiation (BCS + WBI), or BCS with accelerated partial breast irradiation (BCS + APBI). Data on women 50 years or older diagnosed with a node negative invasive breast cancer (≤3 cm in size) between 1995 and 2009 were extracted from the SEER data base. Women treated with mastectomy alone or BCS with radiation were eligible for analysis. Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) among the treatment groups. 150,171 women fulfilled inclusion criteria. OS was significantly improved among women treated with BCS and WBI or BCS and APBI compared to mastectomy alone. Adjusted hazard ratios for death in BCS with WBI or APBI (versus mastectomy alone) were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.79), respectively. Adjusted CSS was also significantly improved in patients treated with BCS and WBI (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.85) as compared to mastectomy. BCS with radiation (WBI or APBI) was associated with significantly improved OS and CSS, versus mastectomy alone. These results support the use of BCS with WBI or APBI (in well selected patients) for the treatment of breast cancer.     

Geographic proximity to treatment for early stage breast cancer and likelihood of mastectomy

Purpose

Women with early stage breast cancer who live far from a radiation therapy facility may be more likely to opt for mastectomy over breast conserving surgery (BCS). The geographic dimensions of this relationship deserve further scrutiny.

Methods

For over 100,000 breast cancer patients in 10 states who received either mastectomy or BCS, a newly-developed software tool was used to calculate the shortest travel distance to the location of surgery and to the nearest radiation treatment center. The likelihood of receipt of mastectomy was modeled as a function of these distance measures and other demographic variables using multilevel logistic regression.

Results

Women traveling over 75 km for treatment are about 1.4 times more likely to receive a mastectomy than those traveling under 15 km.

Conclusions

Geographic barriers to optimal breast cancer treatment remain a valid concern, though most women traveling long distances to receive mastectomies are doing so after bypassing local options.     

Preferences of healthy inner city women and the surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer

Numerous studies have shown that women of a lower education level and socioeconomic status use less breast-conserving surgery than women of a higher education level and socioeconomic status. Surveys of healthy women and the surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer have been performed. However, no survey has focused exclusively on inner city women. The objective of this study was to determine the awareness, preferences, and concerns of inner-city, multiethnic women and the surgical treatment of stage I and II breast cancer, and to identify if a distinct treatment preference for mastectomy or lumpectomy exists in such a population. The study consisted of a prospective survey of volunteers, age 18 years and older, in the nononcologic clinics of St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx, New York. We consecutively surveyed 200 women between the ages of 18 and 75 using a 12-item form from January 2004 to May 2004. Of 200 surveys, 21 were excluded as incomplete and two women surveyed who gave a prior history of breast cancer were excluded from study, leaving 177 total surveys for analysis. Women were presented with a hypothetical diagnosis of early stage breast cancer curable by mastectomy or lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Women were asked about their surgery preferences, who they would seek advice from, if they would let their physician decide treatment, and their concerns if faced with a diagnosis of breast cancer. One hundred seventy-seven completed surveys were obtained; 124 (70%) women chose lumpectomy and radiation, 48 (27%) chose mastectomy, and 5 (3%) chose no treatment. Women who were educated below the collegiate level were more likely to prefer breast conservation therapy compared with those with a college education and above (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0, 3.6). Overall, most women surveyed (62%) were concerned with cancer recurrence followed by the side effects of radiation therapy (19%). Most women surveyed (63%) would make their physician principal advisor, whereas some (23%) would make their significant other the principal advisor. More women who chose mastectomy would make their physician their principal advisor (80%) versus those who chose lumpectomy (65%). More than 80 per cent of the women surveyed would have their physician decide their treatment. The women in the present study exhibited a distinct preference for breast conservation therapy over mastectomy.     

�����ٴ�����ѧ�ᡶ�������ٰ�����ǰ���ܰͽ���ָ�ϡ����½�������

??Express and interpretation on American society of clinical oncology guideline update for Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer WU Ke-jin.
Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
Abstract 2014 April, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) issued new clinical practice guideline on sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer in Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). This guideline update reflects some changes since the 2005 guideline. Based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs), there are three recommendations: (1) Women without sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases should not accept axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). (2) In most cases, Women with 1-2 metastatic SLNs going to undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with whole-breast radiotherapy should not adopt ALND. (3) Women with SLN metastases planning to receive mastectomy should be provided ALND. Based on cohort studies and/or informal consensus, there are two prime recommendations. (1) Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be offered to those women with operable breast cancer and multicentric tumors, with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) planning to undergo mastectomy, who previously got breast and/or axillary surgery or who accepted preoperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy. (2) SNB should not be offered to those women with large or locally advanced invasive breast cancer (tumor size T3/T4), inflammatory breast cancer, or DCIS will undergo BCS, or are pregnant.     

Adherence to guidelines for prevention of postsplenectomy sepsis. Age and sex are risk factors: a five-year retrospective review

BACKGROUND: Vaccination, education and use of long-term antibiotics are recommended in expert guidelines for the prevention of infectious complications after splenectomy. However, studies outside Australia have shown poor adherence to the guidelines. METHOD: The aim of this study was to determine overall adherence to the guidelines and to ascertain any independent risk factors for poor compliance with the guidelines. A retrospective review of hospital records between 1999 and 2004 was carried out. RESULTS: Indications for splenectomy of the 111 patients in this review included post-trauma (32), haematological (32), cancer surgery (24), iatrogenic (12) and others (11). On multivariable analysis, age was associated with a 28% less likelihood to receive education (odds ratio (OR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.92; P = 0.009) and 36% less likelihood to receive long-term antibiotics (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.80; P < or = 0.001). Women were four times more likely to receive education (OR 4.03; 95% CI 1.16-14.0; P = 0.028) and patients who had undergone splenectomy in 2004 were 22 times more likely to have received education compared with those in 1999 (OR 22.53; 95% CI 3.12-162.34; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Education for prevention of sepsis after splenectomy is poorly documented and may be incomplete. Older age and male sex are risk factors in non-adherence to guidelines for prevention of postsplenectomy sepsis. Strategies such as alert cards and information brochures may improve adherence to guidelines particularly in older patients.     

Prostate cancer: socio-economic, geographical and private-health insurance effects on care and survival

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of demographic, geographical and socio-economic factors, and the influence of private health insurance, on patterns of prostate cancer care and 3-year survival in Western Australia (WA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The WA Record Linkage Project was used to extract all hospital morbidity, cancer and death records of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1982 and 2001. The likelihood of having a radical prostatectomy (RP) was estimated using logistic regression, and the likelihood of death 3 years after diagnosis was estimated using Cox regression. RESULTS: The proportion of men undergoing RP increased six-fold, from 3.1% to 20.1%, over the 20 years, whilst non-radical surgery (transurethral, open or closed prostatectomy) simultaneously halved to 29%. Men who had RP were typically younger, married and with less comorbidity. Patients with a first admission to a rural hospital were much less likely to have RP (odds ratio 0.15; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.11-0.21), whereas residence alone in a rural area had less effect (0.54, 0.29-1.03). A first admission to a private hospital increased the likelihood of having RP (2.40, 2.11-2.72), as did having private health insurance (1.77, 1.56-2.00); being more socio-economically disadvantaged reduced RP (0.63, 0.47-0.83). The 3-year mortality rate was greater with a first admission to a rural hospital (relative risk 1.22; 95% CI 1.09-1.36) and in more socio-economically disadvantaged groups (1.34, 1.10-1.64), whereas those admitted to a private hospital (0.77, 0.71-0.84) or with private health insurance (0.82, 0.76-0.89) fared better. Men who had RP had better survival than those who had non-radical surgery (4.85, 3.52-6.68) or no surgery (6.42, 4.65-8.84), although this may be an artefact of a screening effect. CONCLUSION: The 3-year survival was poorer and the use of RP less frequent in men from socio-economically and geographically disadvantaged backgrounds, particularly those admitted to rural or public hospitals, and those with no private health insurance.