G protein-coupled receptor dimerization: function and ligand pharmacology

It is now generally accepted that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist as dimers or as part of larger oligomeric complexes. Increasing evidence suggests that a dimer is the minimal functional structure, but considerable variation exists between reports of the effects of agonist ligands on quaternary structure. Many studies have intimated the existence of heterodimeric GPCR pairings. Key questions that remain to be addressed effectively include the prevalence and relevance of these in native tissues and the implications of heterodimerization for pharmacology and, potentially, for drug design.     

Evolving concepts in G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis: the role in receptor desensitization and signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven transmembrane proteins that form the largest single family of integral membrane receptors. GPCRs transduce information provided by extracellular stimuli into intracellular second messengers via their coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins and the subsequent regulation of a diverse variety of effector systems. Agonist activation of GPCRs also initiates processes that are involved in the feedback desensitization of GPCR responsiveness, the internalization of GPCRs, and the coupling of GPCRs to heterotrimeric G protein-independent signal transduction pathways. GPCR desensitization occurs as a consequence of G protein uncoupling in response to phosphorylation by both second messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation promotes the binding of beta-arrestins, which not only uncouple receptors from heterotrimeric G proteins but also target many GPCRs for internalization in clathrin-coated vesicles. beta-Arrestin-dependent endocytosis of GPCRs involves the direct interaction of the carboxyl-terminal tail domain of beta-arrestins with both beta-adaptin and clathrin. The focus of this review is the current and evolving understanding of the contribution of GRKs, beta-arrestins, and endocytosis to GPCR-specific patterns of desensitization and resensitization. In addition to their role as GPCR-specific endocytic adaptor proteins, beta-arrestins also serve as molecular scaffolds that foster the formation of alternative, heterotrimeric G protein-independent signal transduction complexes. Similar to what is observed for GPCR desensitization and resensitization, beta-arrestin-dependent GPCR internalization is involved in the intracellular compartmentalization of these protein complexes.     

G protein-coupled receptor hetero-dimerization: contribution to pharmacology and function

The concept that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form hetero-dimers or hetero-oligomers continues to gain experimental support. However, with the exception of the GABA_B receptor and the sweet and umami taste receptors few reported examples meet all of the criteria suggested in a recent International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology sponsored review (Pin et al., 2007) that should be required to define distinct and physiologically relevant receptor species. Despite this, there are many examples in which pairs of co-expressed GPCRs reciprocally modulate their function, trafficking and/or ligand pharmacology. Such data are at least consistent with physical interactions between the receptor pairs. In recent times, it has been suggested that specific GPCR hetero-dimer or hetero-oligomer pairs may represent key molecular targets of certain clinically effective, small molecule drugs and there is growing interest in efforts to identify ligands that may modulate hetero-dimer function selectively. The current review summarizes key recent developments in these topics.     

Rich tapestry of G protein-coupled receptor signaling and regulatory mechanisms

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of signaling proteins and the most common therapeutic targets. In the last 2 decades, impressive progress in the understanding of GPCR function has been achieved, driven largely by the idea of similarity of the molecular mechanisms underlying their signaling and regulation. However, recent comprehensive studies of signaling and trafficking of several GPCR subtypes, including endogenous M3 muscarinic and H1 histamine receptor and expressed cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, clearly demonstrate that each receptor is regulated by a unique set of molecular mechanisms involving different players. These data indicate that the "gold mine" of similarities is nearly exhausted and that extrapolation from one receptor to another is as likely to be misleading as illuminating. Further progress in the field requires careful analysis of the regulation of individual GPCR subtypes in defined cellular context. In this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Luo et al. (p. 338) describe a complex pattern of the regulation of M3 muscarinic receptor signaling.     

Functional signaling biases in G protein-coupled receptors: Game Theory and receptor dynamics

Pharmacotherapeutic targeting of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is perhaps the most important field of drug design, as agents designed to control these receptors constitute more than half of the pharmacopeia. Initially GPCRs were considered to be unitary entities, possessing all of their potential functionality in their characteristic heptahelical core. Early models of the functional activity of GPCRs considered them to possess just a simple 'on' or 'off' status. Recent research however has allowed us to realize that GPCR functionality is dependent upon many other proteins outside of the heptahelical core, on the site of GPCR expression in a tissue or a microdomain in a cell, and, most importantly, on the formation of differential 'active' states preferentially coupled to specific signal transduction structures. The recognition of such signaling diversity has facilitated the ability to appreciate and identify ligands for GPCRs that demonstrate a bias towards one signaling form of a receptor to another. However while potentially increasing our ability for selective signal targeting, our approach to understanding the physiological ramifications of systemic signaling manipulation is underdeveloped. This explosion in the complexity of GPCR signaling is now becoming familiar territory to receptor biologists, yet the application of this knowledge to drug design is relatively limited. This review will attempt to outline potential pitfalls and unseen benefits of using signaling bias in therapeutic design as well as highlighting new applications such as Game Theory for uncovering new therapeutic applications for biased agonists.     

Constitutively active G protein-coupled receptor mutants: implications on receptor function and drug action

Mutations of GPCRs can increase their constitutive (agonist-independent) activity. Some of these mutations have been artificially introduced by site-directed mutagenesis; others occur spontaneously in human diseases. The analysis of constitutively active GPCR mutants has attracted a large interest in the past decade, providing an important contribution to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying receptor function and drug action.     

G蛋白偶联受体二聚化研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR s)是最大的细胞膜受体家族,具有七螺旋跨膜肽段结构。近年来,越来越多的研究认为这些受体以二聚体的形式参与调节生理活动,对信号识别及转导有重要作用。随着生物技术及分子生物学的发展,GPCRs二聚体研究已取得了很大的进展。该文就这些方面及同源、异源二聚体对受体结合及信号转导的重要作用作一简述。     

The BMP type II receptor is located in lipid rafts, including caveolae, of pulmonary endothelium in vivo and in vitro

Polymorphic mutations in the Bone Morphogenetic Protein type II receptor (BMPrII) gene have been implicated in the development of familial primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) however, the role BMPrII mutations play in the development of PH has not yet been elucidated. Endothelial caveolae are an important domain of hemodynamics containing eNOS, the serotonin transporter, and endothelin receptors. In this study we show by standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) that BMPrII is widely distributed in the vasculature of the rat lung, and more specifically distributed to both apical and basal membranes of the arteriolar endothelium by fluorescent IHC. We also examined compartmentalization of BMPrII in lipid fractions of plasma membranes isolated by silica based extraction from human pulmonary artery endothelial cells and rat lung endothelium. Density gradient centrifugation demonstrated BMPrII in separate caveolin-1 (cav-1) and non-cav-1 lipid rich fractions. Electron microscopy co-localized cav-1 and BMPrII in flask shaped membrane fragments. Three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy demonstrated BMPrII in discrete membrane foci, a portion of which were co-localized with cav-1, as well as in Golgi. Our findings indicate that BMPrII is located within lipid-dense fractions of pulmonary endothelial cell membranes with a portion present in caveolae suggesting potential dynamic regulatory structural relationships.     

Phylogenetic tree analysis of G protein-coupled 5-HT receptors: implications for receptor nomenclature.

The nomenclature system used to characterize 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes remains controversial. To date, the majority of nomenclature systems have been on the differential pharmacological properties of the receptors. However, the availability of molecular biological data allows for a nomenclature system based on the structural properties of the receptors. The evolutionary relationships between the known G protein-coupled 5-HT receptor subtypes were determined by a phylogenetic tree analysis. The data indicate that 2 major classes of G protein-coupled 5-HT receptors have evolved. Each of the 2 branches differentiate into additional 5-HT receptor subtypes. The most recent branching of 5-HT receptor subtypes occurs at the level of individual species. These data also indicate that the degree of structural similarity (e.g. 93% identify between human and rat 5-HT1B receptors) does not necessarily correlate with pharmacological similarity. Phylogenetic tree analysis allows for a nomenclature framework that can be easily expanded to incorporate additional 5-HT receptor subtypes that have yet to be identified.     

G protein-coupled receptor heteromerization: a role in allosteric modulation of ligand binding

It is becoming increasingly recognized that G protein-coupled receptors physically interact. These interactions may provide a mechanism for allosteric modulation of receptor function. In this study, we examined this possibility by using an established model system of a receptor heteromer consisting of μ and δ opioid receptors. We examined the effect of a number of μ receptor ligands on the binding equilibrium and association and dissociation kinetics of a radiolabeled δ receptor agonist, [(3)H]deltorphin II. We also examined the effect of δ receptor ligands on the binding equilibrium and association and dissociation kinetics of a radiolabeled μ receptor agonist, [(3)H][d-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin ([(3)H]DAMGO). We show that μ receptor ligands are capable of allosterically enhancing δ receptor radioligand binding and vice versa. Thus, there is strong positive cooperativity between the two receptor units with remarkable consequences for ligand pharmacology. We find that the data can be simulated by adapting an allosteric receptor model previously developed for small molecules, suggesting that the ligand-occupied protomers function as allosteric modulators of the partner receptor's activity.     

G protein-coupled receptor drug discovery: implications from the crystal structure of rhodopsin

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a functionally diverse group of membrane proteins that play a critical role in signal transduction. Because of the lack of a high-resolution structure, the heptahelical transmembrane bundle within the N-terminal extracellular and C-terminal intracellular region of these receptors has initially been modeled based on the high-resolution structure of bacterial retinal-binding protein, bacteriorhodopsin. However, the low-resolution structure of rhodopsin, a prototypical GPCR, revealed that there is a minor relationship between GPCRs and bacteriorhodopsins. The high-resolution crystal structure of the rhodopsin ground state and further refinements of the model provide the first structural information about the entire organization of the polypeptide chain and post-translational moieties. These studies provide a structural template for Family 1 GPCRs that has the potential to significantly improve structure-based approaches to GPCR drug discovery.     

G蛋白偶联受体激酶活性调控及其在恶性肿瘤中的作用

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR),是一类重要的细胞表面受体。G蛋白偶联受体激酶(GRK)属于丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶家族,其亚型广泛存在与各种组织,能够特异性地使活化的GPCR发生磷酸化及脱敏,从而终止GPCR介导的信号转导通路。新的研究还发现,GRK不仅作用于GPCR,也可以通过使非GPCR磷酸化或通过非磷酸化作用参与信号转导。GRK不仅能够调节GPCR和非GPCR,其自身活性也可受到多种因素的调节。本文结合GRK的多种功能作用和GRK活性调控,对GRK在脑、内分泌、生殖系统、消化系统及黑色素肿瘤中的作用做简要综述。     

The significance of G protein-coupled receptor crystallography for drug discovery

Crucial as molecular sensors for many vital physiological processes, seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of proteins targeted by drug discovery. Together with structures of the prototypical GPCR rhodopsin, solved structures of other liganded GPCRs promise to provide insights into the structural basis of the superfamily's biochemical functions and assist in the development of new therapeutic modalities and drugs. One of the greatest technical and theoretical challenges to elucidating and exploiting structure-function relationships in these systems is the emerging concept of GPCR conformational flexibility and its cause-effect relationship for receptor-receptor and receptor-effector interactions. Such conformational changes can be subtle and triggered by relatively small binding energy effects, leading to full or partial efficacy in the activation or inactivation of the receptor system at large. Pharmacological dogma generally dictates that these changes manifest themselves through kinetic modulation of the receptor's G protein partners. Atomic resolution information derived from increasingly available receptor structures provides an entrée to the understanding of these events and practically applying it to drug design. Supported by structure-activity relationship information arising from empirical screening, a unified structural model of GPCR activation/inactivation promises to both accelerate drug discovery in this field and improve our fundamental understanding of structure-based drug design in general. This review discusses fundamental problems that persist in drug design and GPCR structural determination.     

A day in the life of a G protein-coupled receptor: the contribution to function of G protein-coupled receptor dimerization

G protein-coupled receptors are one of the most actively studied families of proteins. However, despite the ubiquity of protein dimerization and oligomerization as a structural and functional motif in biology, until the last decade they were generally considered as monomeric, non-interacting polypeptides. For the metabotropic glutamate-like group of G protein-coupled receptors, it is now firmly established that they exist and function as dimers or, potentially, even within higher-order structures. Despite some evidence continuing to support the view that rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors are predominantly monomers, many recent studies are consistent with the dimerization/oligomerization of such receptors. Key roles suggested for dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors include control of protein maturation and cell surface delivery and providing the correct framework for interactions with both hetero-trimeric G proteins and arrestins to allow signal generation and its termination. As G protein-coupled receptors are the most targeted group of proteins for the development of therapeutic small molecule medicines, recent indications that hetero-dimerization between co-expressed G protein-coupled receptors may be a common process offers the potential for the development of more selective and tissue restricted medicines. However, many of the key experiments have, so far, been limited to model cell systems. Priorities for the future include the generation of tools and reagents able to identify unequivocally potential G protein-coupled receptor hetero-dimers in native tissues and detailed analyses of the influence of hetero-dimerization on receptor function and pharmacology.     

The rabbit motilin receptor: molecular characterisation and pharmacology

Following identification of the human motilin receptor, we isolated the rabbit orthologue by PCR amplification and found this to be 85% identical to the open reading frame of the human receptor. The protein encoded was 84% identical to the human polypeptide. In HEK293T cells transfected with the rabbit receptor, motilin concentration-dependently increased intracellular calcium mobilisation (pEC50=9.25). After transfection with Go1alpha, motilin similarly stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC50=8.87). Using both systems, similar values were obtained with the human receptor, with rank-order potencies of motilin=[Nle13]-motilin>erythromycin; ghrelin was ineffective. In circular muscle preparations of rabbit gastric antrum, [Nle13]-motilin 0.1-30 nM concentration-dependently increased the amplitude of electrically-evoked, neuronally-mediated contractions (pEC50=8.3); higher concentrations increased the muscle tension (30-3000 nM). Both responses to [Nle13]-motilin faded rapidly during its continual presence. Rat or human ghrelin 0.01-10 microM were without activity. Erythromycin 30-3000 nM and 10 microM, respectively, increased neuronal activity and muscle tension in rabbit stomach. Unlike [Nle13]-motilin, the increase in neuronal activity did not fade during continual presence of submaximally-effective concentrations of erythromycin; some fade was observed at higher concentrations. We conclude that the pharmacology of the rabbit motilin receptor is similar to the human orthologue and, when expressed as a recombinant, comparable to the native receptor. However, in terms of their ability to increase neuronal activity in rabbit stomach, [Nle13]-motilin and erythromycin are distinguished by different response kinetics, reflecting different rates of ligand degradation and/or interaction with the receptor.     

G protein-coupled receptor for nicotinic acid in mouse macrophages

The use of the HDL-elevating drug nicotinic acid in the treatment and prevention of atherosclerotic disease is limited by the frequent induction of skin flushing. The therapeutic effects of nicotinic acid are attributed to inhibition of lipolysis in adipose tissue via a G protein-coupled receptor, whereas the mechanism of flush induction by release of prostaglandin D(2) from macrophages is not understood. In this study, we investigated if macrophages contain nicotinic acid receptors. Specific guanine nucleotide sensitive binding sites for [(3)H]nicotinic acid were detected in membranes from mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages. Nicotinic acid and related heterocycles stimulated activation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. The rank orders of potency in macrophage membranes were identical for inhibition of [(3)H]nicotinic acid binding and G protein activation, and were pharmacologically indistinguishable from that of the G protein-coupled nicotinic acid receptor in spleen membranes. These results indicate that the effects of nicotinic acid on macrophages, spleen and probably adipocytes are mediated via an identical, unique G protein-coupled receptor.     

Beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation promotes G alpha s internalization through lipid rafts: a study in living cells

Upon binding hormones or drugs, many G protein-coupled receptors are internalized, leading to receptor recycling, receptor desensitization, and down-regulation. Much less understood is whether heterotrimeric G proteins also undergo agonist-induced endocytosis. To investigate the intracellular trafficking of G alpha s, we developed a functional G alpha s-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein that can be visualized in living cells during signal transduction. C6 and MCF-7 cells expressing G alpha s-GFP were treated with 10 microM isoproterenol, and trafficking was assessed with fluorescence microscopy. Upon isoproterenol stimulation, G alpha s-GFP was removed from the plasma membrane and internalized into vesicles. Vesicles containing G alpha s-GFP did not colocalize with markers for early endosomes or late endosomes/lysosomes, revealing that G alpha s does not traffic through common endocytic pathways. Furthermore, G alpha s-GFP did not colocalize with internalized beta2-adrenergic receptors, suggesting that G alpha s and receptors are removed from the plasma membrane by distinct endocytic pathways. Nonetheless, activated G alpha s-GFP did colocalize in vesicles labeled with fluorescent cholera toxin B, a lipid raft marker. Agonist significantly increased G alpha s protein in Triton X-100 -insoluble membrane fractions, suggesting that G alpha s moves into lipid rafts/caveolae after activation. Disruption of rafts/caveolae by treatment with cyclodextrin prevented agonist-induced internalization of G alpha s-GFP, as did overexpression of a dominant-negative dynamin. Taken together, these results suggest that receptor-activated G alpha s moves into lipid rafts and is internalized from these membrane microdomains. It is suggested that agonist-induced internalization of G alpha s plays a specific role in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling and could enable G alpha s to traffic into the cellular interior to regulate effectors at multiple cellular sites.