Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from inv dup(15)

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of an inverted duplication of proximal chromosome 15 [inv dup(15)] presenting as a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) at amniocentesis associated with concomitant microduplication of 8q22.1.Materials and methodsA 39-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age, and the result was 47, XY, +mar dn. The woman requested for repeat amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and DNA methylation analysis were applied to determine the nature of the sSMC.Results: aCGH on the uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 8q22.1 (93,918,763–96,618,539) × 3.0, arr 15q11.2q13.2 (22,765,628–30,658,876) × 4.0, arr 15q13.2q13.3 (30,653,877–32,509,926) × 3.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)]. Interphase FISH analysis using RP11-34H12 [15q13.2; Texas Red, 30,709,033–30,893,021 (hg19)] on 100 uncultured amniocytes showed that 38 cells had three signals, 45 cells had four signals and 27 cells had two signals. The parental bloods had normal aCGH results. The karyotype of cultured amniocytes was 47, XY, +inv dup(15) (pter→q13::q13→pter) which was confirmed by metaphase FISH analysis. No informative markers could be found in QF-PCR analysis. DNA methylation analysis on cord blood confirmed a maternal origin of the 15q11-q13 gene dosage increase with a result of 15q11.2 SNRPN DNA hypermethylation. Postnatal cytogenetic analysis on cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta showed the results consistent with the prenatal diagnosis.ConclusionMolecular cytogenetic techniques are useful for rapid diagnosis of an inv dup(15) chromosome presenting as an sSMC at amniocentesis.     

Prenatal diagnosis of a familial normal euchromatic variant of dup(15)(q11.2q11.2) in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of a familial normal euchromatic variant of dup(15)(q11.2q11.2) in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.Case reportA 32-year-old woman underwent elective amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of anxiety. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(15)(q11.2q11.2). Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1–22, X) × 2 with no genomic imbalance. Cytogenetic analysis of the parental bloods showed that the mother had a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(15)(q11.2q11.2), and the father had a karyotype of 46,XY. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. A healthy 2948 g female baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation without any phenotypic abnormality. Cytogenetic analysis of the cord blood revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(15)(q11.2q11.2).ConclusionPrenatal diagnosis of dup(15)(q11.2q11.2) should include a differential diagnosis of a 15q11.2 (BP1-BP2) microduplication encompassing TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, NIPA2 and NIPA1, and aCGH analysis is useful for the differential diagnosis under such a circumstance.     

Low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome,intrauterine growth restriction,cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line

ObjectiveWe present low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.Case reportA 37-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[11]/46,XY[32], and simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (X,Y) × 1, (1–22) × 2 without genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[5]/46,XY[19], and simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 9p24.3q34.3 × 2.1 (log₂ ratio = 0.1) compatible with 10–15% mosaicism for trisomy 9. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 9. A third amniocentesis at 29 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[5]/46,XY[18], and simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 9p24.3q34.3 × 2.1 (log₂ ratio = 0.1) compatible with 10–15% mosaicism for trisomy 9. Interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 9% (9/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 9. IUGR was noted on prenatal ultrasound. The pregnancy was carried to 38 weeks of gestation, and a 2375-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered. The karyotypes of umbilical cord, cord blood and placenta were 46,XY (40/40 cells), 47,XY,+9[1]/46,XY[39] and 47,XY,+9[12]/46,XY[28], respectively. QF-PCR assays on placenta showed trisomy 9 of maternal origin. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was normal in development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY (40/40 cells), and the buccal mucosal cells had 7.5% (8/106 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 9 by interphase FISH analysis.ConclusionLow-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes.     

Cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 15 in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.Case reportA 33-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation because non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) revealed gene dosage increase at chromosome 15. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[10]/46,XX[13]. Using uncultured amniocytes, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) revealed arr [GRCh37] (X) × 2, (15) × 3 [0.75], multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis showed rsa [GRCh36] 15q11q13 (21,362,818–27,196,819) × 3 [0.76] and methylation-specific (MS)-MLPA analysis showed a methylation index = 0.41 with paternal gene dosage increase at 15q11-q13. Repeat amniocentesis at 25 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[6]/46,XX[14]. Using uncultured amniocytes, quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 15 and determined a paternal origin of the extra chromosome 15, aCGH analysis showed 75%–80% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed 45.5% (46/101 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15. Repeat amniocentesis at 28 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[2]/46,XX[23]. Using uncultured amniocytes, aCGH showed 75–80% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and FISH showed 70.6% (72/102 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15. Using cultured amniocytes, QF-PCR assays excluded UPD 15. Cordocentesis at 30 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15[2]/46,XX[138]. Using cord blood, aCGH revealed 9% gene dosage increase at chromosome 15, and MS-MLPA analysis excluded UPD 15. At 36 weeks of gestation, a 2060-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The cord blood had 46, XX (40/40 cells). The placenta had 47,XX,+15 (40/40 cells). QF-PCR analysis on placenta showed a paternal origin of trisomy 15. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells at age 20 days showed 20% (20/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15.ConclusionCytogenetic discrepancy may occur between uncultured and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis. Cultured amniocytes may present progressive decrease in the levels of mosaicism for trisomy 15 as the fetus grows. Mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis without UPD 15 can be associated with a favorable outcome.     

Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a negative NIPT result,cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues,perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome

ObjectiveWe present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome.Case reportA 31-year-old primigravid woman underwent non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at 12 weeks of gestation, and the result was normal. She underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of fetal choroid plexus cyst, and the result was 47,XX,+21[5]/46,XX[32]. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 19 weeks of gestation, and the result was 47,XX,+21[5]/46,XX[15]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (21) × 3 [0.10], consistent with 10% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 22 weeks of gestation, and the third amniocentesis was performed at 25 weeks of gestation, and the result was 46,XX (20/20 colonies). The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 21. aCGH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.1 (log₂ ratio = 0.1), consistent with 10–15% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 30% (30/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2800-g female baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. The karyotype of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 47,XX,+21[1]/46,XX[39]. 47,XX,+21[4]/46,XX[36] and 46,XX (40/40 cells), respectively. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[1]/46,XX[39], and FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells revealed 8.4% (7/83 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21, compared with 0% in the normal control.ConclusionLow-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be associated with a negative NIPT result, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.     

Low-level mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis without uniparental disomy 15 in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes,a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line

ObjectiveWe present low-level mosaic trisomy 15 without uniparental disomy (UPD) 15 in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes, a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line.Case reportA 40-year-old, gravida 2, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+15 [7]/46,XX [43]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (15) × 2–3 (X) × 2 with 14% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and ME028 multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) methylation test excluded UPD 15. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. She was referred for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis performed at 28 weeks of gestation revealed 46, XX (20/20 colonies) in cultured amniocytes, and in uncultured amniocytes, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed 13.7% (16/117 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 15, aCGH analysis revealed arr [GRCh(hg19)] 15q11.22q26.3 (22, 765, 628–102,256,748) × 2.4 with a log₂ ratio = 0.26, consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 15, and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays excluded UPD 15. The woman was encouraged to continue the pregnancy. At 37 weeks of gestation, a 2400-g phenotypically normal female baby was delivered without any abnormality. The cord blood had 46, XX (40/40 cells). QF-PCR assays determined maternal origin of trisomy 15 in the placenta. When follow-up at age 5 months, the neonate was normal in physical and psychomotor development. FISH analysis on 102 buccal mucosal cells detected 2 cells (2%, 2/102 cells) with trisomy 15 signals, compared with 1% in normal control.ConclusionsLow-level mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis without UPD 15 can be a transient and benign condition, and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line.     

Mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line

ObjectiveWe present mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line.Case reportA 33-year-old woman underwent elective amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of anxiety, and the karyotype of cultured amniocytes was 47,XX,+21[4]/46,XX[13]. In 17 colonies of cultured amniocytes, four colonies had 47,XX,+21, while the other 13 colonies had 46,XX. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (21) × 3 [0.32] consistent with 32% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Repeat amniocentesis performed at 25 weeks of gestation revealed 47,XX,+21[4]/46,XX[24] with four colonies of 47,XX,+21 and 24 colonies of 46, XX on cultured amniocytes, and arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.25 by aCGH, 19.2% mosaicism for trisomy 21 (20/104 cells) by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and no uniparental disomy (UPD) 21 by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) on uncultured amniocytes. The parental karyotypes were normal, and prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. A phenotypically normal 2815-g female baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic analysis on the cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta revealed the karyotype of 47,XX,+21[10]/46,XX[30]. 47,XX,+21[5]/46,XX[35] and 47,XX,+21[38]/46,XX[2], respectively. QF-PCR analysis on the DNA extracted from parental bloods, uncultured amniocytes, cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta confirmed a paternal origin of trisomy 21. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[6]/46,XX[34], and no trisomy 21 signals by interphase FISH was found on 100 buccal mucosal cells. When follow-up at age 13 months, the neonate was phenotypically normal, and the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[3]/46,XX[37].ConclusionMosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be a transient and benign condition, and the abnormal trisomy 21 cell line may decrease and disappear after birth.     

Detection of a familial 21q22.3 microduplication in a fetus associated with congenital heart defects

ObjectiveWe present a familial 21q22.3 microduplication in a fetus associated with prenatally detected congenital heart defects (CHD).Case reportA 38-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation because of sonographic findings of double outlet of right ventricle, ventricular septal defect and transposition of great artery in the fetus. Her husband was 42 years old, and there was no CHD and congenital malformation in the family. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY in the fetus. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis using uncultured amniocytes revealed a 0.56-Mb microduplication of 21q22.3 or arr 21q22.3 (47,482,210-48,043,704)×3.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] encompassing nine Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) genes of FTCD, SPATC1L, LSS, MCM3AP, YBEY, PCNT, DIP2A, S100B and PRMT2. aCGH analysis of the parental bloods revealed that the phenotypically normal father carried the same microduplication. The parents decided to continue the pregnancy, and a 3168-g male baby was delivered at term without Down syndrome phenotype except CHD. Mutational analysis of the CRELD1 gene on the DNA extracted from the cord blood showed no mutation in CRELD1. Postnatal molecular cytogenetic analysis of the cord blood confirmed the prenatal diagnosis. The infant underwent a successful heart surgery to correct the CHD and was doing well without psychomotor or developmental delay at six months of age.ConclusionPrenatal diagnosis of 21q22.3 microduplication associated with CHD should include a differential diagnosis of Down syndrome.     

Mosaic 46,XY,der(15)t(6;15)(q25.1;p12)/46,XY at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome and postnatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line with the unbalanced translocation

ObjectiveWe present mosaic 46,XY,der(15)t(6;15)(q25.1;p12)/46,XY at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome and postnatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line with the unbalanced translocation.Case reportA 34-year-old primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,add(15)(p12)[17]/46,XY[5]. A second amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,der(15)t(6;15)(q25.1;p12)[12]/46,XY[8], and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr arr 6q25.1q27×2-3 with 40% mosaic level. She was referred for genetic counseling. Prenatal ultrasound and the parental karyotypes were normal. A third amniocentesis at 24 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,der(15)t(6;15)(q25.1;p12)[23]/46,XY[1], and in uncultured amniocytes, aCGH analysis revealed arr 6q25.1q27×2.5, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed 51% mosaicism (51/100 cells) for partial trisomy 6q and quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis determined maternal origin of the aberrant chromosome and excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 15 and UPD 6. A fourth amniocentesis at 27 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,der(15)t(6;15)(q25.1;p12)[21]/46,XY[5], and in uncultured amniocytes, aCGH analysis revealed arr 6q25.1q27×2.46, and interphase FISH revealed 35% mosaicism (35/100 cells) for partial trisomy 6q. At 39 weeks of gestation, a healthy 3028-g male baby was delivered without any phenotypic abnormality. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 46,XY,der(15)t(6;15)(q25.1;p12)[2]/46,XY,der(15)t(6;15)(q25.1;p12)[29]/46,XY[11] and 46,XY, respectively. When follow-up at age one month, the neonate was phenotypically normal, the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY (40/40 cells), and FISH analysis on 105 buccal mucosal cells detected five cells with partial trisomy 6q compared with 2% mosaicism (2/100 cells) in the normal control.ConclusionMosaicism for an unbalanced translocation with a normal cell line without UPD at amniocentesis can be a transient and benign condition, and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and postnatal decrease of the aneuploid cell line.     

High-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46, XY at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of high-level mosaicism for 45,X by amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome.Case reportA 35-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[13]/46,XY[11]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of Yp11.3q11.21 × 0–1 [0.1], Yq11.21q11.23 × 0–1 [0.6]. At 19 weeks of gestation, she underwent the second amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 45,X[13]/46,XY[12], and aCGH and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) on uncultured amniocytes showed 37% mosaicism for Y-deleted cells. At 28 weeks of gestation, she underwent the third amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 45,X[25]/46,XY[25], and aCGH on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of Yq11.21q11.23 × 0.5, Yq11.23q12 × 0.7. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed that 16.67% (20/120 cells) were Y-deleted cells. The parental karyortypes and prenatal ultrasound were normal. At 37 weeks of gestation, a 2707-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered with normal male external genitalia. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 45,X[25]/46,XY[15], 45,X[18]/46,XY[22] and 45,X[25]/46,XY[15], respectively. When follow-up at age five months, the neonate was normal in external genitalia and physical development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 45,X[29]/46,XY[11], and FISH analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells showed no abnormal signals. When follow-up at age 11 months, the neonate was physically normal, and the peripheral blood had a karyotype of 45,X[17]/46,XY[23].ConclusionHigh-level mosaicism for 45,X in 45,X/46, XY at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome despite the presence of cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.     

Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic 46,XX,dup(9)(q22.3q34.1)/46,XX at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present our observation of cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic dup(9)(q22.3q34.1) at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.Case reportA 37-year-old, gravida 4, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX, dup(9)(q22.3q34.1)[8]/46,XX[16]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis was performed at 21 weeks of gestation, which revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9)(q22.3q34.1)[7]/46,XX[25]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1–22,X) × 2. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 105 uncultured amniocytes detected only one cell with the dup 9q signal with a mosaic dup 9q level of 1%, compared with 0% in normal control. At 37 weeks of gestation, a 2640-g female baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9) (q22.3q34.1)[4]/46,XX[36], the umbilical cord had a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9) (q22.3q34.1)[2]/46,XX[38], and the placenta had a karyotype of 46,XX. aCGH analysis on cord blood revealed no genomic imbalance. At age 2½ months, the baby was doing well, the peripheral blood of the baby had a karyotype of 46,XX,dup(9) (q22.3q34.1)[4]/46,XX[36], and interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells revealed no dup 9q signal in 100 buccal mucosal cells.ConclusionCytogenetic discrepancy may occur between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic dup(9) (q22.3q34.1). Molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes is useful for rapid distinguishing pseudomosaicism from true mosaicism under such a circumstance.     

Prenatal diagnosis of pseudomosaicism for trisomy 20 at amniocentesis with a negative non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of pseudomosaicism for trisomy 20 at amniocentesis with a negative non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.Case reportA 33-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation, which revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[8]/46,XX[31]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1–22,X) × 2, consistent with no genomic imbalance. She was referred to the hospital for repeat amniocentesis at 23 weeks of gestation. At repeat amniocentesis, cultured amniocytes had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[2]/46,XX[33]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes using SurePrint G3 Unrestricted CGH ISCA v2, 8 × 60 K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1–22,X) × 2, Y × 0. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) probes of RP11-266K16 [20q13.33; fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), spectrum green] and RP11-348I14 (20q11.1-q11.21; Texas Red, spectrum red) detected trisomy 20 signals in 4/104 uncultured amniocytes (3.8%), compared with 0/100 in the normal control. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis using the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy 20. NIPT analysis on maternal blood revealed a negative result without gene dosage increase in chromosome 20. The pregnancy was carried to term, and a healthy 2830-g female baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality. Both cord blood and placenta had a karyotype of 46,XX.ConclusionNIPT is useful for rapid differential diagnosis of pseudomosaicism from true mosaicism in case of mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis.     

Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present our observation of cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.Case reportA 35-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[10]/46,XX[15]. Among 25 colonies of cultured amniocytes, 10 colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20, while the rest were normal. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1–22,X) × 2. The parental karyotypes were normal. Following genetic counseling, the woman underwent repeat amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation. Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+20[3]/46,XX[35]. Among 38 colonies of cultured amniocytes, three colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+20, while the rest were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance, or arr (1–22,X) × 2. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on 101 uncultured amniocytes detected only one cell with three chromosome 20 signals with a mosaic trisomy 20 level of 1% (1/101 cells), compared with 0% in normal control. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy 20. At 38 weeks of gestation, a phenotypically normal 3120-g female baby was delivered. Cytogenetic analysis of cord blood, placental tissue and umbilical cord revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. The neonate was normal at postnatal follow-ups. Postnatal interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells revealed no trisomy 20 signals.ConclusionMosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis can be a cultured artifact. Complete cytogenetic discrepancy may occur between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 20 at amniocentesis, and molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes is useful for rapid distinguishing true mosaicism from pseudomosaicism under such as circumstance.     

Prenatal diagnosis of familial 2p15 microduplication associated with pulmonary artery stenosis,single umbilical artery and left foot postaxial polydactyly on fetal ultrasound

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of familial 2p15 microduplication associated with pulmonary artery stenosis, single umbilical artery and left foot postaxial polydactyly on fetal ultrasound.Case reportA 34-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed the karyotype of 46,XX. Prenatal ultrasound examination at 21 weeks of gestation showed pulmonary artery stenosis, single umbilical artery and left foot postaxial polydactyly. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 22 weeks of gestation and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNAs extracted from amniocytes revealed the result of arr 2p15 (61, 495, 220–62,885,679) × 3.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] with a 1.391-Mb 2p15 duplication encompassing seven Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) genes of USP34, XPO1, FAM161A, CCT4, COMMD1, B3GNT2 and TMEM17. aCGH analysis on the DNAs extracted from parental bloods confirmed a familial transmission from a normal carrier mother who had no phenotypic abnormality. A 3270-g female baby was delivered at term with mild pulmonary artery stenosis and left foot postaxial polydactyly. The infant had normal physical and psychomotor development when follow-up at age of one year.ConclusionPrenatal diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities should include aCGH analysis in addition to conventional cytogenetic analysis.     

Mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, intrauterine growth restriction,intrauterine fetal death,cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes,and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line

ObjectiveWe present mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.Case reportA 26-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of positive NIPT for trisomy 16 at 12 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [10]/46,XX[17], and simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (16) × 3 [0.43] consistent with 43% mosaicism for trisomy 16. She was referred for genetic counseling at 19 weeks of gestation, and a fetus with IUGR was noted to have a size equivalent to 16 weeks of gestation. At 23 weeks of gestation, the fetus manifested oligohydramnios, fetal cardiomegaly and severe IUGR (fetal size equivalent to 20 weeks of gestation). Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX (20/20 colonies) in cultured amniocytes and mosaic trisomy 16 by aCGH in uncultured amniocytes. aCGH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 16p13.3q24.3 × 2.3, consistent with 30% (log₂ ratio = 0.2) mosaicism for trisomy 16. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays on the DNA extracted from parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 16. The parental karyotypes were normal. IUFD was noted at amniocentesis. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a 288-g female fetus was delivered with no phenotypic abnormalities. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 46,XX (40/40 cells), and the placenta had a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 (40/40 cells). QF-PCR assays of the placenta confirmed a maternal origin of trisomy 16.ConclusionMosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis can be associated with positive NIPT for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, IUGR, IUFD, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.     

Mosaic Xq duplication,or 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)/ 46,XX at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present mosaic Xq duplication, or 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)/46,XX at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.Case ReportA 40-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a result of 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)[7]/46,XX[20]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1–22, X) × 2. Cytogenetic analysis on maternal blood revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. At 22 weeks of gestation, she underwent repeat amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 46,XX in 22/22 colonies of cultured amniocytes and an aCGH result of (1–22, X) × 2 in the uncultured amniocytes. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. The parents decided to continue the pregnancy, and a healthy female baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation with a body weight of 3510 g and a body length of 49 cm. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)[3]/46,XX[37]. At age two months, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on buccal mucosal cells showed Xq duplication signals in 1.25% (1/80 cells), compared with 0% (0/90 cells) in the normal control. At age nine months, the neonate had normal physical and psychomotor development. Her body weight was 9.6 Kg (85th - 97th centile), and body length was 72 cm (50th - 85th centile). Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood revealed a karyotype of 46,X,der(X)dup(X) (q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)[1]/46,XX[39]. Interphase FISH analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells revealed no abnormal signal.ConclusionIn case of mosaicism for an Xq duplication with a normal euploid cell line at amniocentesis, the in-vitro culture process of amniocytes may cause over-estimation of the mosaic level for the aberrant chromosome because of culture artifacts, and the abnormal cell line can decline after birth.     

Mosaic 46,XY,dup(14) (q12q22.3)/46, XY at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues

ObjectiveWe present mosaic 46,XY,dup (14) (q12q22.3)/46, XY at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.Case reportA 41-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Cytogenetic analysis on cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 46,XY, dup (14) (q12q22.3)[7]/46,XY [13], and simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 14q12q22.3 × 2–3 with 25% mosaicism for partial 14q duplication. She was referred for genetic counseling. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,dup (14) (q12q22.3)[6]/46,XY [14], and in uncultured amniocytes, quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 14, aCGH revealed arr 14q12q22.3 × 2.3 with 30% mosaicism for dup (14) (q12q22.3), and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed 19.4% (24/124 cells) mosaicism for partial 14q duplication. She was encouraged to continue the pregnancy, and a 2450-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 40 weeks of gestation. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 46,XY,dup (14) (q12q22.3)[14]/46,XY [26], 46,XY,dup (14) (q12q22.3)[7]/46,XY [33] and 46,XY,dup (14) (q12q22.3)[3]/46,XY [37], respectively. When follow-up at age four months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. The karyotype of peripheral blood was 46,XY,dup (14) (q12q22.3)[27]/46,XY [13], and interphase FISH analysis on 105 buccal mucosal cells detected partial 14q duplication signals in 5 cells (4.8% mosaicism). When follow-up at age nine months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. The karyotype of peripheral blood was 46,XY,dup (14) (q12q22.3)[25]/46,XY [15].ConclusionMosaic dup (14) (q12q22.3) with a normal cell line at amniocentesis may be a benign condition, and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues.     

Prenatal diagnosis of maternal uniparental disomy 16 associated with mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis,and pericardial effusion and intrauterine growth restriction in the fetus

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 16 associated with mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis, and pericardial effusion and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in the fetus.Case reportA 38-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age, and the result was 47,XX,+16[2]/46,XX[54]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed 14% mosaicism for trisomy 16 and a paternally inherited 319-kb microdeletion of 15q11.2 encompassing the genes of TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, NIPA2 and NIPA1. Prenatal ultrasound revealed persistent left superior vena cava, pericardial effusion and severe IUGR. Cordocentesis at 23 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XX, but polymorphic DNA marker analysis revealed maternal UPD 16. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 27 weeks of gestation and revealed a karyotype of 46, XX in 21/21 colonies. Molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 22.4% mosaicism (26/116 cells) for trisomy 16 on interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis, and 20% mosaicism for trisomy 16 on aCGH. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on the DNAs extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods revealed maternal UPD 16. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism and severe IUGR. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XX,+16[28]/46,XX[16]. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on placenta confirmed a maternal origin of trisomy 16.ConclusionCytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes may present in mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis. Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 16 should alert the association of maternal UPD 16 which may be associated with congenital heart defects and severe IUGR on prenatal ultrasound.     

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 16 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with abnormal first-trimester screening result (low PAPP-A and low PlGF), intrauterine growth restriction and a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 16 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with an abnormal first-trimester screening result, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable outcome.Case reportA 27-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of an abnormal first-trimester screening result with maternal serum free β-hCG of 1.474 multiples of the median (MoM), pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) of 0.122 MoM and placental growth factor (PlGF) of 0.101 MoM, and a Down syndrome risk of 1/45. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+16 [9]/46,XY [16] and an abnormal array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) result of arr (16) × 3 [0.54] compatible with 54% mosaicism for trisomy 16 in uncultured amniocytes. At 24 weeks of gestation, repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+16 [4]/46,XY [16] and an aCGH result of arr 16p13.3q24.3 (96,766–90,567,357) × 2.25 with a log₂ ratio = 0.2 compatible with 20–30% mosaicism for trisomy 16 in uncultured amniocytes. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 16. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 19.4% (12/62 cells) mosaic trisomy 16. Prenatal ultrasound revealed IUGR. At 36 weeks of gestation, a phenotypically normal baby was delivered with a body weight of 1900 g. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY. QF-PCR analysis confirmed biparentally inherited disomy 16 in the cord blood and maternal-origin of trisomy 16 in the placenta. When follow-up at age two months, FISH analysis on 101 buccal mucosal cells and 32 urinary cells revealed no signal of trisomy 16.ConclusionMosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis can be associated with IUGR and an abnormal first-trimester screening result with low PAPP-A and low PlGF. Mosaic trisomy 16 without UPD 16 at amniocentesis can have a favorable outcome, and the abnormal triosmy 16 cell line may disappear after birth.     

Mosaic isochromosome 20q at amniocentesis: Prenatal diagnosis,genetic counseling and literature review

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic isochromosome 20q [i(20q)] at amniocentesis, and we review the literature.Case reportA 36-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,i(20)(q10)[27]/46,XY[29]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. The parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 20 weeks of gestation. During repeat amniocentesis, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assay were performed on uncultured amniocytes, and conventional cytogenetic analysis, interphase FISH and aCGH were performed on cultured amniocytes. In the repeat amniocentesis, the cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 46,XY. Interphase FISH analysis showed the i(20q) signal in 5.2% (5/96) of the uncultured amniocytes compared with 2% in the control, and in 0.98% (1/102) of the cultured amniocytes compared with 2% in the control. aCGH detected no genomic imbalance in both uncultured and cultured amniocytes. QF-PCR analysis excluded uniparental disomy 20. At 38 weeks of gestation, a healthy 2870-g male baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality. The postnatal blood karyotype was 46,XY. FISH analysis on urinary cells showed 2.1% (2/95 cells) mosaicism compared with 1.9% (2/105 cells) in the control.ConclusionMosaic i(20q) at amniocentesis is a benign condition associated with a favorable outcome in most cases and can be a cell culture artifact confined to cultured amniocytes. Molecular cytogenetic analysis using uncultured amniocytes is useful for rapid confirmation. Prenatal diagnosis of very high percentage of mosaicism for i(20q) at amniocentesis should alert the presence of fetal structural abnormalities. Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic i(20q) at amniocentesis should include a detail examination of fetal brain and spine.