Knowledge,attitude, and practice of Iranian critical care nurses related to prevention of pressure ulcers: A multicenter cross-sectional study

IntroductionPressure ulcers (PU) are a major, but preventable health problem in all health settings, but especially in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of Iranian ICU nurses related to the prevention of PU.MethodsIn a cross-sectional study, data obtained from 183 ICU nurses working in four hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran were evaluated. The study was conducted from July to October 2020. Data were collected using a four-part questionnaire including demographic characteristics, Pieker Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test (PPUKT), Attitude toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APUP) tool, and the practice of nurses related to the prevention of PU.FindingsThe mean scores of KAP of ICU nurses toward PU prevention were 70.57 (SD = 13.51), 52.82 (SD = 6.16), and 22.44 (SD = 5.20), respectively. There was a positive correlation between nurses' attitude and practice (r = 0.232, P = 0.002), and a negative correlation between knowledge and attitude (r = ?0.156, P = 0.035) of nurses regarding PU prevention. Additionally, a positive correlation was found between nurses' years of working experience in ICU and their knowledge regarding PU prevention (r = 0.159, P = 0.032).ConclusionAccording to the results of the present study, the level of KAP of Iranian ICU nurses related to PU prevention were desirable, positive, and relatively desirable. Therefore, nurse managers and policymakers should try to eliminate the main barriers such as heavy workload, inadequate nurse staffing, and lack of appropriate guidelines for PU prevention which consequently affect the practice of ICU nurses in the prevention of PU.     

Knowledge of pressure injury in medical and surgical nurses in a tertiary level hospital: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundNurses play a vital role in pressure injury prevention (PIP) but require foundational knowledge to ensure appropriate PIP strategies are enacted.AimsTo describe and compare medical and surgical nurses’ knowledge of pressure injury (PI) in a tertiary level hospital in China, and to identify predictors of PI knowledge among these groups.DesignA cross-sectional survey was conducted between June and December 2020.MethodsRegistered nurses from nine medical and fifteen surgical wards in a tertiary hospital were invited. The survey was composed of two parts; demographic and professional characteristics; and the Chinese translated version of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool 2.0 (PUKAT 2.0) where the total score ranged from 0 to 25; higher scores imply more knowledge. Medical and surgical nurses' knowledge test scores were compared using independent t-test. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine factors predictive of nurses’ knowledge.ResultsIn total, 423 nurses from 24 wards participated the study and 404 nurses (95.5%) completed the knowledge test (Surgical n = 236, 58.4%; Medical n = 168, 41.6%). The PUKAT 2.0 mean score was 11.6 ± 3.0 (Surgical 12.2 ± 3.0; Medical 10.7 ± 2.8) with 335 (82.9%) nurses scoring <60%. Multiple linear regression showed working in surgical wards, nurse-in-charge position and previous PI training were significant predictors of knowledge scores.ConclusionKnowledge is a precursor to safe practice. Nurses demonstrated poor knowledge of PIP. Pressure injury related education may help improve nurses' knowledge but the extent to which it is used in place and impacts patients’ outcome requires more investigation.     

Knowledge,attitude, and practice of Iranian nurses towards pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review

IntroductionPressure ulcer (PU), as a long-term disabling condition, is an important indicator for patient safety and quality of nursing care in hospitals. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian nurses towards PU prevention.MethodsA systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus databases, Google Scholar Search Engine, as well as Magiran, Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) Persian databases using the relevant keywords, from the earliest date available to August 21, 2020. Studies were appraised using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool).FindingsAmong a total of 1,543 Iranian nurses included in the 9 studies, 80.53% were female with a mean age of 31.14 (SD = 5.52) years. The mean work experience of the participants was 7.94 years (SD = 5.44). The knowledge and practice of Iranian nurses toward PU prevention were insufficient and relatively desirable, respectively. Also, the present study showed that nurses' attitudes toward PU prevention were contradictory. Age, gender, level of education, work experience, and participation in previous educational workshops were possible factors related to nurses' knowledge about PU prevention. Women with higher work experience had a more positive attitude.ConclusionThis review found inappropriate knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian nurses toward PU prevention and highlights the importance of regular upgrading of nurses' knowledge and practice related to PU prevention.     

The knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure ulcer prevention among healthcare support workers in the UK: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundPressure ulcers cause significant, detrimental effects on personal wellbeing. They represent a serious health and social care burden. Nurses and those working in support roles are primarily accountable for preventing pressure ulcers. Healthcare support workers are an expanding group of key workers in the UK.ObjectiveTo examine healthcare support workers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure ulcer prevention.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2020 to June 2021, using Knowledge and Attitudes toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention Assessment Tool.ResultsA total of 164 participants completed the questionnaire fully. A low mean knowledge score of 0.42 ± 0.14, but a positive attitude score of 0.76 ± 0.10 per item were reported. The weakest areas of knowledge include aetiology, risk assessment and addressing pressure-reducing interventions for patients at risk. Higher mean scores per item in knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention were reported in participants working in acute hospital wards and nursing homes (0.468 ± 0.15, 0.47 ± 0.08 respectively) than those in other settings (p < 0.05). Participants working in primary care scored lowest (0.33 ± 0.12). The scores of participants with more positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention significantly correlated with higher score of knowledge (p < 0.005).ConclusionWhile positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention exist among healthcare support workers, this is overshadowed by significant knowledge deficits. Findings highlight the importance of continuing structured education for support workers across both acute and community settings. A future national survey and interventional study are needed to examine support workers’ pressure ulcer knowledge and to inform a national continuous education strategy.     

Factors related to knowledge,attitude, and practice of nurses in intensive care unit in the area of pressure ulcer prevention: A multicenter study

IntroductionAs one of the main members of the health team, nurses have an important role in pressure ulcer prevention in health care centers. The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses on the prevention of pressure ulcers and their related factors.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out in 2018. The total number of ICU nurses employed in educational-health centers affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences were examined. Among a total of 328 nurses, 308 questionnaires were completed by the participants. Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Questionnaire, Attitude Toward Pressure Ulcer, and Practice of Pressure Ulcer Prevention questionnaires were used to collect data. SPSS software version 16 and independent t-test, Chi-square, Fisher exact, one-way Analysis of variance, and multiple linear regressions tests were used for data analysis.FindingsBased on the mean score of knowledge, attitude, and practice of the nurses about the pressure ulcer prevention were 63.47 ± 10.31, 39.10 ± 40.22, and 32.03 ± 6.17, respectively. There was a positive and significant relationship between these three variables. Findings revealed that knowledge was increased by 0.051 units, with a one-year increase in work experience of nurses in the ICU. Moreover, women's knowledge and their attitude were higher than those of men as 3.132 and 1.65 units, respectively. Based on the findings, attitude of nurses increased by 0.43 units for an hour of extra work per week. Nurses' attitude score in the General ICU and their practice were higher than scores of other nurses as 2.144 and 2.574 units, respectively. Moreover, practice of nurses increased by 0.162 unit with one-year increase of their age.ConclusionGiven the undesirable level of knowledge and attitude and relatively desirable practice of nurses in the field of pressure ulcer prevention and the importance of improving the safety of patients admitted to the ICU, it is suggested that appropriate educational planning be developed to raise the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of health care providers, especially nurses, in the area of pressure ulcer prevention.     

The Swedish version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument for use in an operating room context (APUP-OR): A nationwide psychometric evaluation

IntroductionTo assess operating room (OR) nurses' attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention, the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APuP) instrument was developed.AimThe aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APuP) instrument in a Swedish OR context.Materials and methodsA psychometric evaluation study was conducted, using a convenience sample, between February and August 2020. Validity (content, construct, discriminatory power) and reliability (stability and internal consistency) were evaluated.ResultsThe first survey (test) was completed by 284 Swedish OR nurses, of whom n = 50 (17.6%) completed the second survey (retest). A Principal Component Analysis was conducted for the 13-item instrument. The KMO value for this model was 0.62. Bartlett's test for sphericity was statistically significant (p 0.001). Five factors were identified which accounted for 56% of the variance in responses related to attitudes toward pressure ulcer prevention. The Cronbach's α for the instrument “attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention” was 0.66. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.25–0.67).ConclusionThis Swedish version of the APuP- OR is the first step in the development of an instrument to measure OR nurses' attitudes towards PU prevention in a Swedish OR context. The reliability of the instrument was low and the validity moderate. A larger sample and the revision or addition of items related to the context of the operating room should be considered in order to confirm aspects of the psychometric properties.     

Nurses’ attitude on pressure injury prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP)

BackgroundPrevention of pressure ulcers (PU) is one of the most important indicators of the quality of patient care that may be influenced by the attitude of nurses. Nurses are responsible for maintaining the integrity of the skin and preventing its complications. The aim of this study was to assess the overall attitude of nurses on PU prevention based on their scores on the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP).MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases including Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed, and Scopus were searched, using the following keywords: Pressure Ulcer, Pressure injury, Bedsore, Pressure Sore, Decubitus Ulcer, Attitude, and their possible combinations. Heterogeneity of studies was assessed with I² index and Cochrane-Q test. Based on heterogeneity between the studies, the data were analyzed using a random effects model. All the analyses were performed using STATA v.16 software.ResultsTwelve studies with a sample size of 7824 people were analyzed. The overall score of attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention was 70.84% (95% CI: 66.34–75.35) and the highest and lowest scores were related to the dimensions of individual priority (78.83%, 95% CI: 74.69–82.97) and competence (70.11%, 95% CI: 67.24–72.94), respectively. The percentage of the total score of attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention in nurses was higher than nursing students (72.15%, 95% CI: 67.10–77.20 vs. 67%, 95% CI: 53.80–80.20). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results. Publication bias was significant (p = 0.036).ConclusionThe attitude of nurses and nursing students towards the prevention of pressure ulcers was moderate, and providing the necessary training to these groups was essential.     

Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment knowledge of Jordanian nurses

AimsThe aims of the study were to determine: (1) Jordanian nurses' level of knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment of hospitalized patients based on guidelines for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. (2) Frequency of utilization of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions in clinical practice. (3) Variables that are associated with nurses' utilization of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions.BackgroundPressure ulcers are common and previous studies have shown education, knowledge and attitude affect implementation of interventions.MethodsA cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from 460 nurses between June 2010 and November 2010. We used a questionnaire, which was informed by earlier work and guidelines, to collect data about nurses' knowledge and practice of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment.Results/findingsKnowledge and education show an association with implementation of prevention, and demographic variables do not. Similarly knowledge and type of hospital showed an association with implementing treatment. Of concern the use of “donuts” and massage are reported in use.ConclusionAlthough pressure ulcer care is well known by nurses, inappropriate pressure ulcer interventions were reported in use.     

Root cause analysis to identify contributing factors for the development of hospital acquired pressure injuries

IntroductionMany hospital settings are adopting a zero-tolerance policy towards pressure injury (PI) development; this requires good planning and the implementation of care, as the incidence of PIs reflects the quality of care given in a hospital or facility.AimTo identify common contributing factors towards the development of PIs in a geriatric rehabilitation hospital and improve patient safety through the reduction of hospital-acquired PIs.MethodThis was done using root cause analysis (RCA). All patients who developed a Stage 3 or 4 deep tissue injuries or unstageable hospital-acquired PI between December 2017 and April 2018 PIs were investigated using RCA. The RCA was facilitated through the use of a contributing framework developed by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel which guides investigations of different areas of care. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected from several sources and placed in a timeline to reconstruct the series of events. The investigator then identified if the PI was avoidable or not by comparing the evidence with pre-set criteria. Content analysis was further used to analyse the themes retrieved.ResultsA variety of root causes were common amongst all the cases. These included both flaws in the system, such as poor equipment and inadequate educational programmes, as well as human factors such as a lack of basic routine care. No skin assessment was being performed (n = 0) apart from the assessment done on admission. Documentation of action planning when it comes to PI prevention was also missing (n = 0). It was identified that 7 patients were mobilized on admission while the others (n = 3) had a delay in mobilisation, due to some fragmentation in care. There was no documentation of patient and relative education on the prevention of PIs (n = 0). All the patients were provided with the right pressure redistributing mattress however, some mattresses were bottoming out. Some causes overlapped, with system defects like lack of protocols, equipment and tools pushing human errors to occur. This created a series of events leading to the adverse event. The identification of these factors helped to provide an understanding of the changes that are needed to reduce future harm and improve patient safety.ConclusionRecommendations were proposed to reduce contributing factors to the development of hospital-acquired PIs. These include audits to reinforce adherence to hospital guidelines, streamlining of the documentation system, investment in new equipment and improvements to educational programmes. The recommendations implemented resulted in a decreased incidence rate of HAPIs.     

Sacral interface pressure can be alleviated by repositioning with a small-angle change using an automated bed in patients with spinal cord injury

Aim of the studyThis study aimed to compare interface pressure and total contact area of the sacral region in different positions, including small-angle changes, in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Furthermore, we analyzed the clinical factors influencing pressure to identify the pressure injury (PI) high-risk group.Materials and methodsAn intervention was conducted for patients with paraplegia (n = 30) with SCI. In the first and second trials, interface pressure and total contact area of the sacral region were recorded from large- and small-angled positions using the automatic repositioning bed, which can change the angle of the back, lateral tilt, and knee.ResultsPositions with back raised ≥45° showed significantly higher pressure on the sacrum than most other positions. The pressure and contact area differences were statistically insignificant for combinations of small-angled changes <30°.Additionally, the duration of injury (β = 0.51, p = 0.010) and neurological level of injury (NLI) (β = −0.47, p = 0.020) were significant independent predictors of average pressure. Similarly, the duration of injury (β = 0.64, p = 0.001), the Korean version of the spinal cord independence measure-III (β = −0.52, p = 0.017), and body mass index (BMI; β = −0.34, p = 0.041) were significant independent predictors of peak pressure.ConclusionsFor repositioning, combinations of small-angle changes <30° effectively reduce pressure on the sacral region in patients with SCI. Lower BMI, longer duration of injury, lower functioning score, and NLI ≥ T7 are predictors of high sacral pressures, which increase the risk for PI. Therefore, patients with these predictors require strict management.     

Psychometric testing and evaluation of user acceptance of an automatic lateral turning device for the prevention of pressure ulcers

IntroductionRepositioning of patients with reduced or impaired mobility could lessen pressure ulcers (PU). Automated preventive devices can support nurses, but user acceptance must be determined with valid and reliable tools. This study measured user acceptance of an automatic lateral turning device, using a self-developed questionnaire.MethodThe study included 194 nurses in leadership positions from 75 institutions. A two-page user acceptance questionnaire was designed and tested for internal validity (exploratory factor analysis; EFA) and reliability (Cronbach's-α). A linear regression analysis was used to test the model's theoretical framework.ResultsThe overall response rate was 74.9%. The EFA revealed five exploratory factors (“pain/well-being”, “PU prevention”, “handling”, “nurse support”, and “obese patient support”) from the two outcomes (“general satisfaction” and “can replace manual repositioning”). The adjusted r² was 0.607 for “general satisfaction”, with the maximum standardized β for “PU prevention” (0.476), “pain/well-being” (β = 0.197) and “handling” (β = 0.145). The adjusted r² for “can replace manual positioning” was 0.458. The β for “nurse support” was 0.264, followed by “pain-wellbeing” (β = 0.224) and “obese patient support” (β = 0.218).ConclusionThe psychometric testing results were satisfactory. Overall user acceptance of the automatic lateral turning device was high. A positive evaluation of the system's functionality, regarding the prevention of PU, is essential for patient and staff satisfaction, as well as user recommendation.