Effect of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin on Acute and Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundRabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction is associated with reduction in the occurrence of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Therefore, rATG administration is considered as a treatment for AMR. However, only a few studies have investigated the treatment of AMR with rATG after kidney transplantation.MethodsBetween April 2013 and March 2018, 162 consecutive de novo kidney transplantations were performed with induction immunosuppressive therapy comprising tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, and basiliximab. AMR was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of DSA and episode biopsy findings. For DSA-positive recipients, plasmapheresis was performed to remove DSA before rATG administration (1.5 mg/kg for 5 days). Patients treated with rATG against active AMR were retrospectively analyzed for graft function.ResultsA total of 13 kidney transplant recipients developed active AMR within 302 days after transplantation. After rATG administration, the mean serum creatinine and urine protein levels significantly declined from 3.03 mg/dL to 1.68 mg/dL (P = .002) within 46 days and from 3.01 g/gCr to 0.54 g/gCr (P = .006) within 106 days, respectively. The peripheral blood lymphocyte count rapidly decreased after rATG administration and remained low for 12 months. With regard to adverse events, fever (84.6%), cytomegaloviremia (84.6%), thrombocytopenia (61.5%), anemia (30.8%), and neutropenia (15.4%) occurred within 3 months after rATG administration.ConclusionsrATG improved graft function by suppressing peripheral blood lymphocytes in kidney transplant recipients with active AMR. The rATG administration as a treatment for active AMR may contribute to positive graft outcomes after kidney transplantation.     

Effect of donor-to-recipient HLA matching in low-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients without induction therapy on acute rejection,graft survival,infections, and surgical complications at 3 years: The road towards new recommendations

BackgroundDonor-to-recipient human leukocyte antigen mismatching is considered one of the strongest determinants for graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).ObjectiveThis retrospective study discusses the impact of HLA matching as low immunological risk KTR without induction therapy.Material and methodsRecords of 80 adult kidney transplant patients were reviewed with three years of the follow-up. All patients had panel reactive antibodies (PRA) < 20%, absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and did not receive the induction therapy. These patients were divided into two groups according to their HLA matching between donor and recipient: 55 patients with ≥ 3 HLA matches (Group I; low immunogenicity) were compared to 25 patients with <3 HLA matches (Group II; high immunogenicity). The primary endpoints included the rate and severity of acute rejection (AR) episodes, graft function (creatinine level), and survival at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months. Secondary endpoints include the rate and type of infections at one-year, surgical complications at one-year, and patient survival at 1, 6, 12, and 36 months after kidney transplantation. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups except for recipient age, donor gender, and pre-transplant dialysis time.ResultsThere was no significant difference observed between two groups at one-year in infection rate, the length of hospital stay, AR severity, the rate of cytomegalovirus infection, and the occurrence of delayed graft function. However, the rate of AR, the graft function upon discharge, and the rate and type of surgical complications at one-year were significantly higher in Group II (high immunogenicity). The patient and graft survival at three years, the death-censored graft survival, and the serum creatinine levels at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months were similar between two groups. Two deaths occurred in each group (NS).ConclusionIn our center, the donor-to-recipient HLA mismatch is not considered an immunological risk factor in low-risk kidney transplant recipients (PRA < 20% and absence of DSA).     

Outcomes after anti-thymocyte globulin vs Basiliximab induction before deceased donor kidney transplants

BackgroundDeceased donor kidney transplants represent an important source of renal replacement for the 100 000 patients initiating hemodialysis annually. We compared the association of induction therapy, anti-thymocyte globulin [rabbit] (rATG) or basiliximab, with posttransplant rejection, graft and patient survival.MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, we identified patients that received deceased donor kidney transplants. The outcomes analyzed were 6- month rejection, 1-year rejection, patient survival and graft survival. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to understand the association of induction therapy and rejection. Cox-proportional hazards models were constructed to ascertain the association of choice of induction therapy with both patient and graft survival.ResultsOf 45 339 patients, 33 906 patients received rATG induction therapy and 11 433 patients received basiliximab induction therapy. The rATG group were younger (53.44 years vs 55.28 years, P < 0.001), more frequently female (58.74% male vs 66.08%, P < 0.001) and more frequently Black (34.78% vs 25.66%, p < 0.001) compared with patients in the basiliximab group.Rejection was more likely with basiliximab compared with rATG at 6 months(OR = 1.64, P < 0.001; 7.81% Basiliximab vs 5.23% rATG)and at 12 months (OR = 1.56, P < 0.001; 8.81% Basiliximab vs 6.31% rATG). Basiliximab induction therapy was associated with worse patient survival, (HR = 1.05, P = 0.017). Basiliximab induction therapy was associated with worse graft survival, (HR = 1.03, P = 0.037).ConclusionThe analysis of the national experience demonstrated favorable rejection, patient survival, and graft survival with rATG usage. Further prospective data are necessary to provide treatment recommendations.     

Comparison of alemtuzumab vs. antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in primary non‐sensitized renal transplant patients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal

Alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) are commonly used for induction therapy in renal transplantation. This retrospective, single‐center, cohort study evaluated cumulative incidence of one‐yr biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) among 200 consecutive primary non‐sensitized kidney transplant recipients who received either alemtuzumab (n = 100) or rATG (n = 100) induction followed by rapid steroid taper, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol biopsies, plasma and urine BK virus PCR, serum creatinine and iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), were obtained at 1, 4, and 12 months from transplantation. The one‐yr BPAR rates were similar between the alemtuzumab and rATG groups; however, rejection Banff IA and higher was more common in the alemtuzumab arm (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.047). After adjusting for confounding variables, alemtuzumab was still associated with Banff IA and higher rejection (adjusted OR: 3.7, CI: 1.2–10.5, p = 0.02). Despite similar rates of BK viremia, more patients in the alemtuzumab arm developed BK nephropathy (16% vs. 3%, p = 0.046). One‐year iGFR (53.4 ± 20.2 vs. 71.9 ± 27.2 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.002) and three‐yr graft survival (89.5% vs. 95%, p = 0.05) were lower in the alemtuzumab group. In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients on steroid‐free immunosuppression, alemtuzumab was associated with more severe rejection and BK nephropathy compared to rATG.     

Shared alloimmune responses against blood and transplant donors result in adverse clinical outcomes following blood transfusion post–renal transplantation

De novo HLA donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) following transplantation are associated with alloimmune injury and allograft failure. Blood transfusions are allogeneic, and when given posttransplant (PTBT) they may independently increase the risk of HLA antibody development. This study aims to analyze the development of HLA transfusion‐specific antibodies (TSA) to blood donors of transfusions given posttransplant and examine the impact on clinical outcomes. A total of 244 blood donors of transfusions received by 86 transplant patients (46 who developed a DSA post transfusion and 40 who remained DSA negative) were HLA typed. De novo TSA developed against 150/244 (61.5%) blood donors. In 70/150 (46.7%) cases the TSA was of shared HLA antibody specificity with a DSA response in the recipient (DSA+ = TSA+). This occurred when there was a greater overall HLA match between the blood and transplant donor. DSA+ = TSA+ patients had increased risk of allograft failure (P = .0025) and AMR (P = .02) compared with the DSA+ ≠ TSA+ patients. To conclude, PTBT may elicit de novo HLA antibodies. Enhanced HLA matching between the blood and transplant donor is more likely to result in a DSA and TSA of shared antibody specificities. Transfusion avoidance or the use of HLA matched or selected blood may reduce this risk and improve outcomes.     

De novo donor‐specific antibodies in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated kidney‐transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT studies

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with an increased risk of antibody‐mediated rejection and graft failure. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, kidney‐transplant recipients were randomized to receive belatacept more intense (MI)–based, belatacept less intense (LI)–based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression for up to 7 years (84 months). The presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined at baseline, at months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84, and at the time of clinically suspected episodes of acute rejection, using solid‐phase flow‐cytometry screening. Samples from anti‐HLA‐positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of DSAs, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. In BENEFIT, de novo DSAs developed in 1.4%, 3.5%, and 12.1% of belatacept MI‐treated, belatacept LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT‐EXT were 3.8%, 1.1%, and 11.2%. Per Kaplan‐Meier analysis, de novo DSA incidence was significantly lower in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated patients over 7 years in both studies (P < .01). In patients who developed de novo DSAs, belatacept‐based immunosuppression was associated with numerically lower MFI vs cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression suppresses de novo DSA development more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.     

Single-Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Compared With Divided-Dose for Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation in a Predominantly Black Population

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare single-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) with a divided dose in kidney transplant recipients within a majority Black patient population.MethodsWe analyzed the outcomes before and after a change in protocol from divided-dose (1.5 mg/kg/day over 4 days) to single-dose (6 mg/kg over 24 hours) rATG in a retrospective cohort study. All patients who received rATG for kidney transplant induction between December 2015 and July 2018 were included.ResultsA total of 197 patients (n = 98 in the divided-dose group, n = 99 in the single-dose group) received rATG. There was no difference in time to rejection at 1 year (P = .82) or incidence of rejection (P = .80). There was also no difference in delayed graft function, serum creatinine, or survival at 1 year. Patients in the single-dose group were more likely to leave the hospital by postoperative day 3 (12% vs 2%, P = .006). The cytomegalovirus infection rate was higher in the single-dose group (P = .031).ConclusionsUse of a single-dose rATG regimen is an acceptable accelerated induction compared with the standard divided dose for induction therapy in kidney transplant in a predominantly Black population.     

Retreatment by antithymocyte globulin for second kidney transplantation: Efficacy,tolerance and safety

BackgroundIt is unknown whether kidney transplant patients who receive rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) become immunized against rabbit antibodies, leading to reduced efficacy, or are at higher risk of cytomegalovirus infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) on retreatment. The efficacy and tolerance of rATG when used as induction for the second time in patients undergoing retransplantation have not been evaluated.MethodsIn a retrospective case–control study, 54 retransplanted patients who received rATG (Thymoglobulin) induction for the second time during 2004–2010 were compared to a matched cohort of 108 patients receiving rATG induction for a first kidney transplantation during the same period. Maintenance treatment was similar in both groups.ResultsMedian follow-up was 45.8 months and 47.3 months in the second and first treatment groups, respectively. No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of leukocyte, lymphocyte or platelet depletion. Dose and duration of rATG treatment were similar in both groups, suggesting a similar tolerance profile. Cytomegalovirus infection (including primoinfection and reactivation) occurred in 4/54 retreated patients versus 22/108 controls (p = 0.108). Use of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis was similar between groups. PTLD occurred in one control patient and no retreated patients.ConclusionA second course of rATG induction results in similar lymphocyte depletion and is as well tolerated as a first course. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was not increased during retreatment. Further studies are required to evaluate specific T cell subpopulation depletion and compare long-term outcome in patients receiving a second induction with rATG.     

De Novo Donor‐Specific HLA Antibodies Are Associated With Rapid Loss of Graft Function Following Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes

Outcomes after islet transplantation continue to improve but etiology of graft failure remains unclear. De novo donor‐specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) posttransplant are increasingly recognized as a negative prognostic marker. Specific temporal associations between DSA and graft function remain undefined particularly in programs undertaking multiple sequential transplants. Impact of de novo DSA on graft function over 12 months following first islet transplant was determined prospectively in consecutive recipients taking tacrolimus/mycophenolate immunosuppression at a single center. Mixed‐meal tolerance test was undertaken in parallel with HLA antibody assessment pretransplant and 1–3 months posttransplant. Sixteen participants received a total of 26 islet transplants. Five (19%) grafts were associated with de novo DSA. Five (31%) recipients were affected: three post–first transplant; two post–second transplant. DSA developed within 4 weeks of all sensitizing grafts and were associated with decreased stimulated C‐peptide (median [interquartile range]) at 3 months posttransplant (DSA negative: 613(300–1090); DSA positive 106(34–235) pmol/L [p = 0.004]). De novo DSA directed against most recent islet transplant were absolutely associated with loss of graft function despite maintained immunosuppression at 12 months in the absence of a rescue nonsensitizing transplant. Alemtuzumab induction immunosuppression was associated with reduced incidence of de novo DSA formation (p = 0.03).     

Everolimus-based Immunosuppression Possibly Suppresses Mean Fluorescence Intensity Values of De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies After Primary Kidney Transplantation

PurposeWe evaluated de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) production of everolimus (EVR)-based immunosuppression for primary kidney transplant recipients involved in the A1202 study at our institute.MethodsFrom March 2008 to August 2009, 24 recipients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups. The EVR group received reduced cyclosporin A and EVR. The standard protocol (STD) group received standard cyclosporin A and mycophenolate mofetil. Both groups received basiliximab and steroids. De novo DSA was identified using LABScreen single antigen beads (One Lambda, Canoga Park, Calif., United States). Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values > 1000 were considered positive. P < .05 was considered significant.ResultsGraft survival was 100% in the EVR group and 90.9% in the STD group. All patients remained on the primary protocol in the EVR group, but 3 patients in the STD group (27.3%) were converted to tacrolimus due to DSA and non-adherence. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was similar in both groups. No EVR group recipients and 9.1% of STD group recipients were treated for T-cell-mediated rejection. No recipients of the EVR group exhibited peritubular capillaritis, while 9.1% in STD group developed chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. LABScreen revealed an accumulative class II DSA production rate of 15.4% in the EVR group and 18.3% in the STD group at 10 years. When the MFI cut-off level was set to 6000, anti-HLA antibody and de novo DSA-free survival was significantly better in the EVR group.ConclusionsEVR-based immunosuppression provided equivalent or even better clinical outcomes. EVR suppressed de novo DSA production at 10 years follow-up; however, further follow-up is inevitable.     

Significance of HLA-matching and anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplant patients receiving induction therapy?

ObjectivesThough Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching benefits are demonstrated in renal transplantation, evidence in heart transplantation is lacking, and its clinical feasibility is uncertain. Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies are being increasingly studied in organ transplantation, with diverging conclusions between transplantated organs.MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively the influence of HLA matching and anti-HLA antibodies on overall survival, acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy in 309 patients receiving induction therapy and triple-drug immunosuppression.ResultsThe average number of HLA-A/B/DR mismatches between donor and recipient was 4.9 ± 1. The majority of mismatches was for Class I HLA-A/B with an average of 3.3, then for Class I HLA-DR with an average of 1.6. Overall, the HLA-A/-B/-DR mismatches had no influence on the cardiac allograft survival (p = 0.28). However, HLA-DR mismatches were negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection (p = 0.04). Our analysis found anti-HLA antibodies in 27% of recipients, de novo anti-HLA antibodies in 16% of recipients, and donor-specific anti-HLA (DSA) antibodies in 8% of recipients. Furthermore, de novo DSA had no influence on the 5-year survival (78% with DSA vs. 92% without DSA; p = 0.49), which may be masked by the limited number of recipients in analysis By univariable analysis, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on severe cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy.ConclusionsHLA-DR mismatch was negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection but had no influence on cardiac allograft survival. In this study, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy. The results of this study add to the controversy on the impact of allo-antibodies in heart transplant recipients receiving induction therapy and contemporary immunosuppression.     

Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 is well preserved and symptom dependent in kidney transplant recipients

Data on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients are scarce. Thus, we conducted a single-center observational study to assess the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence in outpatient kidney transplant recipients (KTR; n = 1037) and healthcare workers (HCW; n = 512) during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in fall 2020 and evaluated the clinical variables affecting antibody levels. Antibodies against S1 and S2 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 were evaluated using immunochemiluminescent assay (cut off 9.5 AU/ml, sensitivity of 91.2% and specificity of 90.2%). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence was lower in KTR than in HCW (7% vs. 11.9%, p = .001). Kidney transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were younger (p = .001) and received CNI-based immunosuppression more frequently (p = .029) than seronegative KTR. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive symptomatic KTR had a higher BMI (p = .04) than asymptomatic KTR. Interestingly, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were higher in KTR than in HCW (median 31 AU/ml, IQR 17–84 vs. median 15 AU/ml, IQR 11–39, p < .001). The presence of moderate to severe symptoms in KTR was found to be the only independent factor affecting IgG levels (Beta coefficient = 41.99, 95% CI 9.92–74.06, p = .011) in the multivariable model. In conclusion, KTR exhibit a well-preserved symptom-dependent humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.     

Impact of early blood transfusion after kidney transplantation on the clinical outcomes and allograft survival

IntroductionAnemia in chronic kidney disease is of great concern regarding blood transfusions and the possibility of allosensitization for future kidney transplants and the occurrence of rejection and allograft loss in the post-transplant period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of early blood transfusion on the occurrence of rejections, allograft function and survival in the first year after transplantation.Material and methodsThis retrospective study was carried out with 445 patients submitted to kidney transplant allocated to two groups. The first group received early blood transfusions after transplant (n = 125, 28.09%), and the second group did not receive blood transfusions (n = 320, 71.91%). The patient outcomes were evaluated during a 1-year follow-up.Results14 patients given blood transfusion (11.2%) lost their allograft in the first year in comparison with 8 (2.5%) without transfusion (p < 0.001). There were 9 deaths in each group, which corresponded to 7.2% of the patients who received blood transfusions and 2.81% of those who did not (p < 0.035). Patient hospitalization lasted 15 days in transfusion group and 8.5 days in non-transfusion group (p < 0.001). Creatinine levels were higher in the patients who received blood transfusion than in those without transfusion in the first and third months after transplantation (p = 0.012 and 0.038, respectively). During the first year, the patients who received blood products experienced more antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (13.60%) than patients who did not (4.38%) (p < 0.001). Those who received blood transfusions also developed de novo DSA in higher proportion than those without transfusion against both class I and class II HLA (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study showed that blood transfusions in the first month after transplantation had a negative impact on kidney function, graft survival, and contributed to the development of de novo DSA, an increased risk of ABMR and infections.     

Heart Transplantation for Giant Cell Myocarditis: A Case Series

BackgroundGiant cell myocarditis (GCM) has a poor prognosis without heart transplant, but post-transplant survival is unknown.PurposeTo describe the post-transplant survival of patients with GCM at a large transplant center.MethodsSeven patients underwent heart transplant for histologically confirmed GCM of the explanted heart. The median age was 59 years, and 43% (3 of 7) were female. All patients had cardiogenic shock, multiorgan failure, elevated troponin, and recurrent ventricular tachycardia, and some required mechanical circulatory support. All patients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in the perioperative period at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg daily for 1 to 5 days and 4 received intravenous immunoglobulin 1 g/kg daily for 2 days after rATG. All patients had early initiation of tacrolimus by first to third postoperative day depending on renal function, early mycophenolate, and high dose steroid. All were maintained using tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone.ResultsOne patient had asymptomatic recurrence of GCM at 3 months, managed by up-titration of tacrolimus, and had asymptomatic 2R cellular rejection at 4 months, managed with steroid bolus. No patient had high-grade rejection. One patient died at 267 days, possibly of GCM. Six of 7 (86%) remain alive at a median of 842 days (2.3 years) post transplant.ConclusionsPatients with GCM have excellent post-transplant survival with use of rATG and triple drug immunosuppressive therapy; however, some patients remain at risk for GCM recurrence after transplant, which may respond to augmented immunosuppression.     

Significance of C1q-fixing Donor-Specific Antibodies After Kidney Transplantation

Objectives

De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with allograft rejection and allograft loss. However, not all DSA are equally detrimental to allograft function. The ability to activate complement may be an important factor differentiating clinically relevant DSA from nonrelevant DSA. The C1q assay detects a subset of HLA antibodies that can fix complement. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between C1q-fixing de novo DSA (dnDSA) and clinical outcomes posttransplant.

Methods

This retrospective study included 193 sera from kidney transplant recipients who underwent posttransplant DSA testing and/or kidney biopsy for clinical causes. Thirty-five of the 193 (18.1%) had immunoglobulin G DSA. Seventeen of the 35 patients were excluded owing to the presence of pretransplant HLA antibodies. We then analyzed C1q DSA at the time of biopsy in 18 recipients who developed dnDSA. The clinical outcomes of patients with C1q-positive DSA and C1q-negative DSA were compared.

Results

C1q-positive DSA were detected in 10 of 18 patients (55.6%). The incidences of transplant glomerulopathy were significantly higher among patients with C1q-positive DSA than patients with C1q-negative DSA (80% vs 0%; P = .001). Although patients with C1q-positive DSA experienced more chronic antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss (80% vs 37.5% [P = .145]; 60% vs 25% [P = .188]), the differences were not significant. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the C1q assay was an excellent predictor of transplant glomerulopathy with area under the curve of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.769–1.000).

Conclusion

The presence of C1q-positive dnDSA was associated with an increased risk of transplant glomerulopathy. The C1q assay is potentially a powerful method for identifying patients at risk for transplant glomerulopathy.     

Reductions in immunosuppression after haematological or solid organ cancer diagnosis in kidney transplant recipients

Few data exist on how immunosuppression is altered in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) following a diagnosis of cancer. This study investigated how immunosuppression was altered in KTR after cancer diagnosis and its effect on patient and graft survival. All KTR diagnosed with cancer at our centre from 1990 to 2012 were assessed. Drug regime and serum creatinine levels were recorded 1 year before, at time of, and 1 year after cancer diagnosis. Of 87 KTR who developed cancer (7.3% of transplanted population, n = 1189), 30 developed haematological malignancies and 57 developed solid organ cancers (SOC). In total, 38% of KTR presented with nodal or metastatic disease and 23 of 87 (26%) KTR died within 6 months of cancer diagnosis. Fifty‐five KTR had records of pre‐ and postcancer diagnosis drug regimes. Thirty‐six KTR had a (>50%) dose reduction or cessation of 1 or more immunosuppressive agents, and 19 no reduction in immunosuppression. In total, 2 of 36 (6%) of KTR who underwent a dose reduction suffered acute rejection that was reversed with methylprednisolone. Dose reduction/cessation of immunosuppression did not impair graft function, but also did not affect cancer free survival. Further larger prospective studies are needed to determine whether dose reduction alters relapse free cancer survival in KTR.     

Pediatric Kidney Transplantation—Living or Deceased Donor?

BackgroundKidney transplantation is ideal for children and adolescents with chronic end-stage renal disease because it offers better growth, development, and quality of life. Donor choice is vitally important in this age group, given the long life expectancy of these patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (<18 years) who underwent kidney transplantation from January 1999 to December/2018 was performed. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between living and deceased donor transplants.ResultsWe included 59 pediatric kidney transplant recipients, 12 from a living donor and 47 from a deceased donor. Thirty-six (61.0%) patients were boys, and 5 (8.5%) had a retransplant. There were no differences between groups on sex, race, and weight of the recipient and donor, as well as the age and the etiology of the recipient's primary disease. Most recipients received induction immunosuppression with basiliximab and maintenance with triple therapy, with no differences between groups. Living donor transplants were mostly pre-emptive (58.3% vs 4.3%, P < .001) and had fewer HLA mismatches (≤3: 90.9% vs 13.0%, P < .001), older donors (38.4 vs 24.3 years, P < .001) and shorter hospital stays (8.8 vs 14.1 days, P = .004). There were no statistically significant differences regarding medical-surgical complications and graft or patient survival. However, we found that at 13 years post-transplant 91.7% of the living donor grafts were functioning vs 72.3% of the deceased donor grafts.ConclusionOur experience points out that a living donor graft in pediatric patients is associated with a higher probability of pre-emptive transplant, shorter hospital stay, greater HLA compatibility, and increased graft survival.     

Increased risk of rejection after basiliximab induction in sensitized kidney transplant recipients without pre‐existing donor‐specific antibodies – a retrospective study

Depleting induction therapy is recommended in sensitized kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), though the detrimental effect of nondonor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies is not undeniable. We compared the efficacy and safety of basiliximab and rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG) in sensitized KTRs without pre‐existing donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs). This monocentric retrospective study involved all sensitized KTR adults without pre‐existing DSAs (n = 218) who underwent transplantation after June 2007. Patients with basiliximab and rATG therapy were compared for risk of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) and a composite endpoint (BPAR, graft loss and death) by univariate and multivariate analysis. Patients with basiliximab (n = 60) had lower mean calculated panel reactive antibody than those with rATG (n = 158; 23.7 ± 24.2 vs. 63.8 ± 32.3, P < 0.0001) and more often received a first graft (88% vs. 54%, P < 0.0001) and a transplant from a living donor (13% vs. 2%, P = 0.002). Risks of BPAR and of reaching the composite endpoint were greater with basiliximab than rATG [HR = 3.63 (1.70–7.77), P = 0.0009 and HR = 1.60 (0.99–2.59), P = 0.050, respectively]. Several adjustments did not change those risks [BPAR: 3.36 (1.23–9.16), P = 0.018; composite endpoint: 1.83 (0.99–3.39), P = 0.053]. Infections and malignancies were similar in both groups. rATG remains the first‐line treatment in sensitized KTR, even in the absence of pre‐existing DSAs.     

HLA Sensitization in the Era of COVID-19: Single-Center Experience

It is well known that several viral infections are capable of triggering the formation of HLA antibodies; however, an association between SARS-CoV-2 and the development of anti-HLA antibodies is not yet confirmed. In this study, we compared the prevalence of HLA antibody before and after COVID-19 infection in a cohort of 3 groups included 58 healthy nonsensitized employees (HNEs), 130 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and 62 kidney transplant candidates. There were no significant changes observed in HLA class I antibodies in any of the groups, but evaluation of antibodies to HLA class II revealed a significant change in the KTR group (P = .0184) after acquiring COVID-19 infection and in the HNE group (P = .0043) when compared to the reported prevalence in a similar population. Although we observed the emergence of convalescent de novo donor-specific antibodies in 2 patients, we did not encounter any rejection episodes in the KTR group. Finally, the results of flow cytometry crossmatch in the HNE group were not consistent with the state of antibodies. In conclusion, COVID-19 infection has the potential to produce class II antibodies but with little effect on preexisting sensitization. These antibodies are likely to be transient and not necessarily causing positive crossmatch with the corresponding antigens at the proper mean fluorescent intensity and therefore should not affect access to transplantation. There is a need for further evaluation to ascertain the genuineness of these antibodies and their exact effect on transplant readiness and outcomes.     

Adequate tacrolimus exposure modulates the impact of HLA class II molecular mismatch: a validation study in an American cohort

Clinicians have few tools to predict the risk of alloimmune injury that would guide immunosuppression management in renal transplant patients. We evaluated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR/DQ molecular mismatch to predict de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) during the first year of transplant and explored how differences in tacrolimus exposure may modulate this risk. HLA-DR and -DQ eplet mismatches were determined between 444 donor-recipient pairs in Denver, Colorado between 2007 and 2013. Previously defined mismatch thresholds stratified recipients into low- (N = 119), intermediate- (N = 153), and high- (N = 172) risk categories. The area under the curve for DSA at 1 year was 0.84 and 0.82 for HLA-DR and HLA-DQ eplet mismatches, respectively. Compared to low-risk patients, there was a graded increase in risk of DR/DQ DSA in intermediate (HR 15.39, 95% CI 2.01-118.09, p = .009) and high-risk (HR 23.81, 95% CI 3.17-178.66, p = 0.002) categories. Intermediate- and high-risk patients with a mean tacrolimus <6 ng/ml versus >8 ng/ml had increased risk of DR/DQ DSA at 1 year (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.05-5.22, p = .04). HLA molecular mismatch represents a reproducible, objective, and clinically relevant tool to stratify patients by alloimmune risk and may help guide personalized immunosuppression management.