C3d Assay in Correlation With Single Antigen Bead Assay for Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies

Background

Single antigen bead assay (SAB) is a sensitive method for detecting HLA antibodies, but it does not specifically identify clinically relevant subsets. Recently, a new assay has been developed for detection of C3d bound to HLA antibody-antigen complex. We evaluated the C3d assay regarding its correlation with SAB in renal patients.

Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in solid organ transplantation patients

Objective

HLA alloimmunization is caused by various sensitization events, such as transfusion, pregnancy, or organ transplantation. However, the effects of a particular sensitization event on HLA alloimmunization have not been well studied in parallel using an identical test method. We evaluated how different sensitization events affect the panel-reactive antibody (PRA) status in solid organ transplantation candidates.

Methods

PRA identification tests were performed on 674 patients (354 males and 320 females) using Luminex assay kits (LIFECODES, Gen-Probe, Stamford, CT, United States). PRA-positive rates (HLA-A, B, or DR antibodies of median fluorescence intensity [MFI] values of ≥1000) and antibody strengths in PRA-positive cases were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.

Results

PRA (class I and/or II)-positive rates were significantly higher in patients with transfusion (33.0%; P = .001), pregnancy (71.4%; P < .001), or transplantation events (76.9%; P < .001) than in controls without any identifiable sensitization events (5.6%). Transplantation had the strongest immunization effect, especially for class II HLA antigens. Female compared with male patients (60.3% vs 34.2%; P < .001) and retransplantation compared with first transplantation candidates of kidney transplantation (80.2% vs 41.1%; P < .001) showed a significantly higher PRA-positive rate. Retransplantation candidates (MFI 14,164) showed significantly stronger antibody strength than first transplantation candidates (MFI 5456) and those with single sensitization events of transfusion (MFI 4185) or pregnancy (MFI 5548; P < .001 for each).

Conclusion

Solid organ transplantation appears to have the strongest HLA alloimmunization effect followed by pregnancy and transfusion, especially for class II HLA antigens.     

Anti-HLA Antibody Profile of Turkish Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

Exposure to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) via blood transfusions, pregnancies, and previous transplantations can result in anti-HLA antibody production. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies in recipient sera before transplantation is an important risk factor. To demonstrate the anti-HLA antibody status of Turkish end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, 674 patients (mean age, 40.35 ± 13.15 years; female/male, 328/346) were enrolled into the study. Anti-HLA antibody screening and identification tests were performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. The panel-reactive antibody (PRA)-negative group consisted of 564 (83.6%) and the PRA-positive group consisted of 110 (17.3%) patients. Of the 110 (17.3%) PRA-positive patients, 43 (6.4%) were class I (+) and class II (−); 19 (2.8%) were class I (−) and class II (+); 48 (7.1%) were both class I and II (+). The most frequent antibodies were directed against the A2 crossreactive group (CREG) and the A10 CREG with less frequent reactions against the B7 CREG, indicating antibodies to both frequent (members of A2 CREG) and relatively rare (members of A10 CREG and B7 CREG antigens). These data also suggested that some antibodies occur at greater than expected frequency because of shared epitopes. Our findings confirmed the significant correlation between female gender, pregnancy, failed graft history, long dialysis duration, and blood transfusions with PRA positivity (P < .05).     

Correlation of Luminex-Based Single Antigen Based Results With Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch and Flow Cytometry Crossmatch Results: A Single-Center Experience From Istanbul

BackgroundThis study aimed to retrospectively investigate the correlation of mean Class I donor-specific antibody (DSA) intensity values detected in Luminex-based techniques with the results of complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) results.MethodsA total of 335 patients with kidney failure and their living donors whose CDC-XM, FC-XM, and single antigen based (SAB) tests were studied between 2018 and 2020 for transplant preparation from living donor candidates were included in the study. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to their mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of SAB assay.ResultsAnti-HLA antibodies (class I and/or class II) were detected using SAB in 91.6% patients included in the study (MFI >1000). Class I DSA was positive in 34.8% of patients with anti-HLA antibodies. When CDC-XM and FC-XM results were evaluated in the 4 groups separated according to MFI values, 3 patients with DSA MFI <1000 had negative CDC-XM and T-B-FC-XM results. Of 32 patients with DSA-MFI between 1000 and 3000, 93.75% (n = 30) had T-B-FC-XM or CDC-XM-negative results, and 6.25% (n = 2) had B-FC-XM-positive results. The CDC-XM, T, and B-FC-XM were negative in all 17 patients with DSA-MFI between 3000 and 5000. Our results showed that MFI >5834 DSA values were significantly correlated with positive T-FC-XM (P < .001), and MFI >6016 values were significantly correlated with positive CDC-XM (P = .002). In addition, MFI values >5000 were associated with both CDC-XM and FC-XM in our study.ConclusionsThe MFI values >5000 correlated with both CDC-XM and FC-XM.     

Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 1066 cases

BackgroundPatients awaiting solid organ transplantation may develop anti-HLA antibodies after sensitization events such as transfusions, pregnancies, or previous transplantations. However, the effects of a particular sensitization event on HLA alloimmunization have not been well studied in parallel using cell-based assays and solid-phase assays. In this study, we evaluated and compare how different sensitization events affect the HLA antibody screening (HLA-Ab) and donor specific antibody (DSA) status in solid renal organ transplantation patients.MethodsHLA antibody (HLA-Ab) screening tests like complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM), flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) and Luminex panel-reactive antibody (L-PRA) were performed in all 1066 patients (635 males and 431 females). If any of these tests turned out to be positive, a Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay was performed for DSA identification. Test positive rates and antibody strengths were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.ResultsIn this study, HLA-Ab screening tests positive rates (L-PRA, FC-XM and CDC-XM) were significantly higher in patients with previous transplantation (73.91%, 100% and 56.52% p < 0.001), previous pregnancy (57.46%, 70.14% and 18.85% p < 0.001) or blood transfusion (27.33%, 35.55% and 7.33% p < 0.001) compared with patients without a sensitizing event (6.17%, 13.58% and 1.09). In this study, re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength (DSA) than non sensitized group (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 2659, 3329; P < 0.001) and those with single sensitization events of transfusion (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 5790.26, 6004.16; P < 0.001) or pregnancy (class I & II MFI 11418, 17,837 vs class I and II MFI 8631.71, 7253.29; P < 0.001).ConclusionsPregnancy and blood transfused had high allo-immunization rate for class I HLA antigens. While re-transplantation patients had high allo-immunization rate for both the HLA classes (HLA- class I and HLA- class II). Re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength, followed by pregnancy and then transfusion.     

Post-transplant de novo non donor-specific HLA antibodies are not associated with poor graft outcome in non-sensitized pediatric recipients of kidney transplantation

While de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSAs) have a detrimental impact on kidney graft outcome, the clinical significance of de novo non donor-specific antibodies (dnNDSAs) is more controversial. We retrospectively evaluated for Ab development and characteristics of dnNDSAs serially collected post-transplant sera and, when available, graft biopsy eluates, from 144 non-sensitized, primary pediatric kidney recipients, consecutively transplanted at a single center between 2003 and 2017, using HLA class I and class II single-antigen flow-bead assays (SAB). The results were compared with clinical-pathologic data from HLA antibody negative and HLA dnDSA-positive patients.Forty-five out of 144 patients developed dnNDSAs (31%). Among the dnNDSA-positive patients, 86% displayed one or more class I/II antibodies recognizing antigens included in the CREG/shared epitope groups that also comprise the mismatched donor HLA antigens. Despite potential pathogenicity, as suggested by their occasional presence within the graft, dnNDSAs displayed significantly lower MFI, and limited complement binding and graft homing properties, when compared with dnDSAs. In parallel, the graft survival probability was significantly lower in patients with dnDSA than in those with dnNDSA or without HLA antibodies (p < 0.005). Indeed, the dnNDSA-positive patients remaining dnDSA-negative throughout the posttransplant period did not develop clinical antibody mediated rejection and graft loss, and maintained good graft function at a median follow-up of 9 years. The biological characteristics of dnNDSAs may account for the low graft damaging capability when compared to dnDSAs.     

Detection of donor-specific HLA antibodies: A retrospective observation in 350 renal transplant cases

BackgroundThe main objective of this study was to determine the results of the cell-based assay (CDC-XM and FC-XM), and correlate with the results of solid phase assay (L-SAB).MethodsIn this retrospective study, 350 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, FC-XM and L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor.ResultsT-cell-FC-XM showed a sensitivity of 71.43% and a specificity of 91.50% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-cell-FCXM showed a sensitivity of 94.94% and a specificity of 61.99% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). On the other hand, T-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 32.14% and a specificity of 98.64% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 44.30% and a specificity of 94.83% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). In this study, the results indicated that DSA class I MFI value of 2845 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 4585 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive T-cell-CDC-XM. However, DSA class II MFI cut-off of 1988 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with B-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 5986 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive B-cell-CDC-XM.ConclusionsOur study showed that CDC-XM has poor sensitivity, while FC-XM has poor specificity to detect DSA. L-SAB has good correlation with T-cell-FC-XM (p < 0.0001) but not with B-cell-FC-XM (P = 0.31). DSA strength >2845 and > 1988 significantly correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity and B-cell-FC-XM positivity, respectively. While, a MFI value of >4585 and > 5986 significantly correlated with T-cell-CDC-XM positivity and B-cell-CDC-XM positivity, respectively. These MFI cut-off values could serve as a surrogate marker for CDC-XM and FC-XM tests and may help in resolving the limitations of cell-based techniques. In conclusion, we found that L-SAB is more sensitive and specific than CDC-XM and FC-XM and therefore may be used as a test of choice.     

Comparison Between Total IgG,C1q,and C3d Single Antigen Bead Assays in Detecting Class I Complement-Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies

Background

Complement-binding donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection and allograft loss. Novel single antigen bead (SAB) assays—that is, complement component 1q (C1q) and complement component 3d (C3d) assays—have been developed to specifically detect complement-binding DSA, but it remains unclear whether these assays have an improved ability to detect complement-binding DSA as compared with using the total IgG SAB assay with a high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoff. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the total IgG, C1q, and C3d SAB assays in detecting complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies.

Investigation of Anti-HLA Antibodies of Highly Sensitized Patients by Single Antigen Bead and C1q Tests

PurposeThe single antigen bead (SAB) test contributes to conventional cellular and solid phase crossmatch tests in renal transplantation. However, the determination of anti-HLA antibodies of the patients may not reflect the pathologic features of these antibodies. Highly sensitized patients produce antibodies against a number of HLAs; therefore, their transplantation chance decreases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate SAB and C1q test results of highly sensitized patients.MethodIn this study, 33 end-stage renal failure patients with >80% panel reactive antibody were included. Of the patients, 58% (n = 19) were female, and 42% (n = 14) were male. The mean age was 46.2 ± 12.4. All of the serum samples were inactivated by heat before use. SAB and C1q tests were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.ResultsWe obtained statistically significant results between the positive bead counts and raw mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of 2 tests (P < .01 for class I and II). There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 tests in terms HLA-A, -C, -DR, and -DP MFI values, whereas HLA-B and -DQ MFI values were similar for the 2 tests.ConclusionThe difference of raw MFI values between the 2 tests may be due to the fact that the C1q test detects only IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies, whereas the SAB test can detect all IgG subtypes. We considered that anti-HLA-B and -DQ antibodies have high complement-fixing features; these antibodies should be investigated selectively due to the similarity of anti-HLA-B and -DQ antibody MFI values in the 2 tests.     

Association of HLA phenotypes of end-stage renal disease patients preparing for first transplantation with anti-HLA antibody status

Patients with pre-transplantation high levels of panel reactive antibody (PRA) have an increased risk of graft failure, and renal transplantation in sensitized patients remains a highly significant challenge worldwide. The influence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies on the development of rejection episodes depends on patient-specific clinical factors and differs from patient to patient. The HLA typing of the recipient might influence the development of anti-HLA antibodies. Some HLA antigens appear to be more immunogenic than others. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the distribution of HLA phenotypes in PRA-positive and PRA-negative end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on the basis of having sensitizing events or not. Our study included 642 (mean age: 41.54; female/male: 310/332) ESRD patients preparing for the first transplantation and who are on the cadaveric kidney transplantation waiting list of Istanbul Medical Faculty in 2008–2009. Class I HLA-A,B typing was performed by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) method, whereas class II HLA-DRB1 typing was performed by low-resolution polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequence-specific primer (SSP). All serum samples were screened for the presence of IgG type of anti-HLA class I- and II-specific antibodies by enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PRA-negative group consisted of 558 (86.9%) and PRA-positive group included 84 (13.1%) patients. We have found statistically significant frequency of HLA-A3 (p = 0.018), HLA-A66 (p = 0.04), and HLA-B18 (p = 0.006) antigens in PRA-positive patients and DRB1*07 (p = 0.02) having the highest frequency in patients with sensitizing event history but no anti-HLA development suggesting that DRB1*07 might be associated with low risk of anti-HLA antibody formation.     

Influence of pretransplant class I and II non-donor-specific anti-HLA immunization on immunologic outcome and graft survival in kidney transplant recipients

BackgroundAnti-HLA immunization determined by Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) is known to have a negative impact on patient and graft survival. The predictive value of peak PRA (pPRA) on immunologic outcome, however, and the individual effects of anti-HLA class I and II antibodies remain uncertain.MethodsThe influence of HLA immunization on immunologic outcome parameters and graft survival was investigated in 1150 adult patients without pretransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and in a subgroup of elderly kidney recipients aged ≥ 65 (n = 264). Anti-HLA immunization was defined as a pPRA > 0%. We investigated the influence of class I and II pPRA by dividing all kidney recipients into four pPRA groups (0%, 1–20%, 21–80%, >80%).ResultsPatients with non-donor-specific pretransplant anti-HLA immunization were at a higher risk for developing de novo DSA (49.9% vs. 18.7% p < 0.001), antibody mediated rejections (ABMR) (15.7% vs. 5.1%; p < 0.001), had a poorer death censored graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2%; p < 0.001) and a higher decline of the calculated GFR. In elderly patients anti-HLA immunization only had a significant influence on the development of DSA (40.5% vs. 27.4%; p = 0.004). A multivariate model adjusted for all relevant factors revealed only class I but not class II pretransplant HLA immunization as a significant independent risk factor for de novo DSA, ABMR and death censored graft loss (HR 2.76, p < 0.001, HR 4.16, p < 0.001 and HR 2.07, p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionMainly non-donor-specific pretransplant HLA class I immunization is an independent risk factor for the development of de novo DSA, ABMR and graft loss.     

The challenge of using the virtual crossmatch as a singular tool for the detection of Anti-HLA antibodies- A study from a tertiary care institute from South India

IntroductionDetection of donor specific antibodies (DSA) is critical in both solid organ and mismatched haematopoietic stem cell transplants. The single antigen bead assay (SAB) is widely used as a virtual crossmatch in these settings. However, HLA allele variation across ethnicities and differing genetic backgrounds is a well-known and acknowledged fact and representation of alleles prevalent in a population is key while using a virtual crossmatch as a sole decision making tool. Against this background, this study was performed to assess the feasibility of using the SAB as a single tool to identify DSA in our population.Materials and methodsThe HLA alleles identified in the study population were analysed to assess their representation on SAB panels from two different vendors.ResultsThe study population comprised of a total of 966 subjects for whom 6 loci high resolution HLA typing was done. A total of 241 different alleles were assigned in the population. Among the 241 alleles identified in our study population, 48.55% (n = 117) alleles were represented in the SAB A panel and 48.13% (n = 116) represented in the SAB B panel. Unrepresented alleles were 51.45% (n = 124) in panel A and 51.87% (n = 125) in panel B. All the twelve alleles were represented for 16.05% (n = 155) and 16.25% (n = 157) of study population in panel A and in panel B respectively. The remaining individuals (83.95%, (n = 811) in panel A and 83.75%, (n = 809) in panel B) had at least one allele unrepresented.ConclusionOur study addresses an important limitation in utilizing the SAB as a single tool to identify DSA, owing to non-representation of locally prevalent / unique alleles in our population. More than 50% of alleles were unrepresented in both the SAB assays we studied, which included alleles from both Class I and Class II. We recommend therefore that, until a comprehensive coverage of alleles is provided, or epitope matching becomes robust, that the SAB be combined with a physical crossmatch when mismatched alleles are not represented.     

IgM single antigen bead HLA-assay is affected by imlifidase through the cleavage of IgG but not IgM

AimThe aim of this study was to investigate if human IgM is a cleavable substrate for imlifidase and to explain an observed effect in anti-HLA IgM single antigen bead (SAB) assays in sensitized patients.MethodsSerum samples collected pre- and 24 h post-imlifidase administration from sensitized patients enrolled in a phase II trial were investigated for anti-HLA IgG and IgM using SAB assays, with and without in vitro IgG depletion using a CaptureSelect™ affinity matrix. In addition, pre-dose samples and purified human IgM samples were treated with imlifidase in vitro and evaluated by SDS-PAGE, Western blot (PE-conjugated anti-human IgM) and SAB (IgG, IgM) assays.ResultsBy comparing the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HLA-beads, pre- and post-imlifidase administration, three IgM-related patterns were observed; IgM-specific HLA-SABs with an increased MFI post-imlifidase, IgM-specific HLA-SABs with a decreased MFI post-imlifidase, and IgM-specific HLA-SABs with a marginal MFI difference between the pre- and post-imlifidase administration. These IgM signal patterns were observed despite neither purified IgM nor serum IgM could be cleaved by imlifidase. After removing IgG, the effects observed on anti-HLA IgM was largely eliminated with the biggest differences seen in patients with very high anti-HLA IgG in pre-dose samples.ConclusionWe demonstrate that imlifidase does not cleave human IgM, including HLA-specific IgM antibodies from highly sensitized subjects. Observed decreases of SAB-HLA IgM signals after imlifidase treatment may result from the cleavage of IgG-IgM complexes which are bound to SAB-HLA. Serum analysis of patients with high levels of anti-HLA IgG will result in a more accurate SAB-HLA IgM reading after IgG depletion.     

Corrected Panel-Reactive Antibody Positivity Rates for Hypersensitized Patients in Turkish Population With Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Software

Introduction

High rates of panel-reactive antibody (PRA) may decrease the chance of kidney transplantation and may result in long waiting periods before transplantation. The calculated PRA (cPRA) is performed based on unacceptable HLA antigens. These antigens are identified by a program that was created based on the antibodies that developed against the HLA antigens circulating in serum and on the risk of binding of these antibodies to antigens. The antigen profile of the population and antigen frequencies can be measured, and more realistic cPRA positivity rates may be obtained using this method.

Clinical significance of low pre-transplant donor specific antibodies (DSA) in living donor kidney recipients with negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (CDCXM), and negative flow cytometry crossmatches (FLXM) – A single-center experience

BackgroundIt is controversial whether all donor-specific antibodies (DSA) detected by the solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) assay negatively affect kidney transplantation outcomes. The study aimed to evaluate the possible clinical significance of low pre-transplant DSA in living donor kidney recipients. We analyzed a group of patients with HLA-A, B, and -DR DSA reactivities below a virtual crossmatch (VXM) value of 5000 MFI but with all VXM DSA reactivities at HLA-DQ, -DP, and -Cw, which were not typed routinely for donors prior to transplantation. We also investigated the incidence of persistent and de novo DSAs in available posttransplant SAB assays.MethodsFrom the historical cohort of living donor recipients transplanted between 2014 and 2018 at our center (n = 82), 55 patients met the inclusion criteria, namely: these patients were > 18 years old with non-HLA identical sibling donors, who were not desensitized, who had available pre-transplant SAB results, and who had negative both complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FLXM) results. An additional donor HLA typing, performed for all 55 recipients, identified donor additional HLA-DQ, -DP, and -Cw DSA reactivities. These patients were then divided by SAB reactivity into three groups: 1) those with DSA-positive reactivities; 2) those with non-donor-specific anti-HLA reactivities (NDSA); and, 3) those who were anti-HLA-negative. All these recipients were followed for three years and checked for their de novo or persistent DSA.ResultsIn the studied cohort, DSA-positive, NDSA reactive, and anti-HLA negative recipients constituted 33%, 36%, and 31% of 55 patients, respectively. Non-routinely considered pre-transplant HLA-DQ, -DP, and -Cw DSA-positive reactivities were shown in as many as 78% of DSA-positive cases (group 1) with the lowest MFI value of 319 to DP4 and the highest MFI of 5767 to DQ2. Of the pre-transplant HLA-A, B, and -DR DSA reactivities, only -DR52 DSA reactivity reached the highest MFI value of 2191. These detected DSAs did not reduce the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values and did not increase the incidence of proteinuria in recipients. While the 3-year graft survival was lower in the DSA-positive group (94.4%) with one recipient who lost kidney transplant, the difference was not significantly different (p = 0.7) from the NDSA (100%) and negative (100%) groups. In terms of the incidence of de novo acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) at three years after transplantation, no case has been reported in the cohort. This may suggest that low DSA-positive recipients do not experience higher rejection rate. However, DSA-positive recipients had a tendency for a higher frequency of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and de novo DSA.ConclusionOur 3-year follow-up of patients with low pre-transplant DSA found no association with a deterioration in graft function and worse graft survival. Furthermore, we did not observe an increase in AMR in our patients with low DSA. A larger cohort and a longer follow-up period may be needed to evaluate the tendency of low DSA-positive recipients towards the higher incidence of C4d deposits in PTC and/or de novo DSA.     

Frequency and Determinants of Pregnancy‐Induced Child‐Specific Sensitization

The aim of this study was to define the frequency and determinants of pregnancy‐induced child‐specific sensitization shortly after full‐term delivery using sensitive single HLA‐antigen beads (SAB) and high resolution HLA‐typing of the mothers and their children (n = 301). A positive SAB result was defined by a background normalized ratio >1 or a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >300, >500 and >1000, respectively. The overall frequency of pregnancy‐induced sensitization determined by SAB shortly after full‐term delivery was between 45% (MFI > 1000 cut‐off) and 76% (ratio cut‐off). The rate of child‐specific sensitization at the HLA‐A/B/C/DRB1 loci was between 28% (MFI > 1000 cut‐off) and 38% (ratio cut‐off). The number of live birth was associated with a higher frequency of sensitization, which was driven by child‐specific, but not third party HLA‐antibodies. There was a clear hierarchy of sensitization among the investigated loci (B‐locus: 31%; A‐locus: 26%; DRB1‐locus: 20%; C‐locus: 15%; p < 0.0001). Some mismatched paternal HLA‐antigens led to a significantly higher rate of sensitization than the average (e.g. HLA‐A2, HLA‐B49, HLA‐B51, HLA‐C*15). Furthermore, the mother's own HLA‐phenotype—especially HLA‐A/B homozygosity—was associated with a higher rate and broadness of sensitization. The number of mismatched HLA‐A/B/C eplets strongly correlated with the rate of child‐specific class I sensitization.     

Antibodies to cryptic epitopes on HLA class I and class II heavy chains bound to single antigen beads: Clinically relevant?

Cell surface HLA class I consists of trimers, i.e., alpha - heavy chain, beta – 2 - microglobulin, and a peptide, termed closed conformers (CC) on non-activated lymphocytes. HLA class I and class II may also exist, respectively, as alpha-chain only or alpha and beta - chain only on activated cells termed open conformers (OC). We extend previous studies using an OC-specific monoclonal antibody that demonstrate LABScreen HLA class I and II single antigen beads (SABs) contain a mixture of open and closed conformers. LIFECODES SABs have bound CC only. More HLA class I and class II LABScreen SABs were reactive than LIFECODES SABs due to the presence of OC on LABScreen SABs. We hypothesized that antibody against OC on HLA B antigens would not be detected in cell based cross matches (XMs) with typical lymphocyte targets since anti-HLA OC antibodies would not react with native HLA CC on the cell surface. To test this hypothesis, we performed flow cytometry XM (FCXM) assays with sera of sufficient strength that most laboratories would likely predict positive FCXMs. Sera that reacted strongly with LABScreen SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly or not at all with LIFECODES SABs (<1000 MFI) gave negative T and B cell FCXMs. In contrast, sera that reacted with LIFECODES SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly with LABScreen SABs (<2100 MFI) exhibited positive FCXMs. Detection of antibodies directed against OC in SAB assays, may lead to inappropriate listing of unacceptable antigens, a decision not to XM or pre-or post – transplant desensitization procedures.     

Antibody-mediated rejection owing to donor-specific HLA-DQA1 antibodies after renal transplantation: A case report

BackgroundDonor-specific HLA antibodies are important risk factors in antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss after renal transplantation and are associated with higher rejection rates and lower graft survival. Most de novo donor specific antibodies (dnDSA) after renal transplantation are directed toward donor HLA-DQ antigens. An HLA-DQ antigen is a heterodimer consisting of an alpha and beta chain. Traditionally, HLA-DQA1 typing has not been part of pretransplant evaluation. Therefore, DQ alpha proteins are not usually considered in the interpretation of HLA-DQ antibody reactions.MethodsThe renal transplant recipient had a 0% panel reactive antibody pretransplant. Two years after transplantation, he developed symptoms of abdominal distension and bilateral lower extremity edema. Histopathological findings on renal puncture biopsy showed a combination of T-cell-mediated acute rejection type IIA and antibody-mediated rejection with a trend toward chronicity in the transplanted kidney. DSAs were investigated by HLA-I (HLA-A/B) and HLA-II (HLA-DRB1/DQA1/DQB1) single antigen bead (SAB) assay. HLA typing was performed to explain the antibody reactivity patterns by PCR-SSO and Sequencing-based typing (SBT). HLAMatchmaker analysis was performed to identify eplets that explain antibody reactivity patterns.ResultsHLA-II SAB analysis of the patient's serum at the time of rejection showed positive reactions with all DQB1*03:03-carrying beads with high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). However, DQB1*03:03 was not a dnDSA antigen. High-resolution HLA typing revealed that HLA-DQA1*05:01 and DQA1*03:02 were mismatched donor antigens. HLA Matchmaker analysis demonstrated reactivity toward 130R and 116 V eplet on DQA1 and DQB1.ConclusionsAntibodies specific to DQα chains after renal transplantation were highlighted.     

IgG Donor-Specific Anti-Human HLA Antibody Subclasses and Kidney Allograft Antibody-Mediated Injury

Antibodies may have different pathogenicities according to IgG subclass. We investigated the association between IgG subclasses of circulating anti-human HLA antibodies and antibody-mediated kidney allograft injury. Among 635 consecutive kidney transplantations performed between 2008 and 2010, we enrolled 125 patients with donor-specific anti-human HLA antibodies (DSA) detected in the first year post-transplant. We assessed DSA characteristics, including specificity, HLA class specificity, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), C1q-binding, and IgG subclass, and graft injury phenotype at the time of sera evaluation. Overall, 51 (40.8%) patients had acute antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR), 36 (28.8%) patients had subclinical ABMR (sABMR), and 38 (30.4%) patients were ABMR-free. The MFI of the immunodominant DSA (iDSA, the DSA with the highest MFI level) was 6724±464, and 41.6% of patients had iDSA showing C1q positivity. The distribution of iDSA IgG1–4 subclasses among the population was 75.2%, 44.0%, 28.0%, and 26.4%, respectively. An unsupervised principal component analysis integrating iDSA IgG subclasses revealed aABMR was mainly driven by IgG3 iDSA, whereas sABMR was driven by IgG4 iDSA. IgG3 iDSA was associated with a shorter time to rejection (P<0.001), increased microcirculation injury (P=0.002), and C4d capillary deposition (P<0.001). IgG4 iDSA was associated with later allograft injury with increased allograft glomerulopathy and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy lesions (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Integrating iDSA HLA class specificity, MFI level, C1q-binding status, and IgG subclasses in a Cox survival model revealed IgG3 iDSA and C1q-binding iDSA were strongly and independently associated with allograft failure. These results suggest IgG iDSA subclasses identify distinct phenotypes of kidney allograft antibody-mediated injury.