Kidney Transplant Outcomes in elderly Recipients: An Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry Study

BackgroundThere is an increase in elderly patients receiving kidney transplant internationally. This study describes elderly kidney transplant recipient outcomes in Australia and New Zealand.MethodsThe study included all adult first kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand from 2000 to 2015. Survival and graft outcomes were compared between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (18-69 years) recipients using Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsOverall, 10651 kidney transplant recipients were included, of which 279 (2.6%) were elderly adults. The proportion of elderly recipients increased from 0.6 to 4.4% from 2000 to 2015. Compared with younger recipients, elderly recipients were more likely to receive kidneys from deceased donors, elderly donors, and expanded criteria donors. Elderly recipients experienced poorer patient survival with 1- and 5-year survival ranging from 96% to 97% and 79% to 81%, respectively, compared with 97% to 99% and 90% 95% in younger recipients, respectively. Elderly recipients experienced comparable rates of delayed graft function and, in living donor kidney recipients, lower rates of acute rejection.ConclusionsKidney transplantation in the elderly population is increasing. Although elderly recipients had inferior survival and graft outcomes, elderly recipients generally received poorer quality kidneys. The outcomes achieved in this cohort of elderly adults are encouraging, and improving elderly recipient outcomes should be an important focus for research.     

Outcomes from organ donation following medical assistance in dying: A scoping review

AimTo collate and summarize the current international literature on the transplant recipient outcomes of organs from Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) donors, as well as the actual and potential impact of organ donation following MAiD on the donation and transplantation system.BackgroundThe provision of organ donation following MAiD can impact the donation and transplantation system, as well as potential recipients of organs from the MAiD donor, therefore a comprehensive understanding of the potential and actual impact of organ donation after MAiD on the donation and transplantation systems is needed.DesignScoping review using the JBI framework.MethodsWe searched for published (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Academic Search Complete), and unpublished literature (organ donation organization websites worldwide). Included references discussed the actual and potential impact of organ donation following MAiD on the donation and transplantation system. All references were screened, extracted and analysed by two independent reviewers.ResultsWe included 78 references in this review and our finding were summarized across three categories: (1) Impact in the donor pool: (2) statistics on organ donation following MAiD; and (3) potential and actual impact of MAiD on the donation and transplant system.ConclusionsThe potential impact of the MAiD donor on the transplant waiting list is relatively small as this process is still rare, however, due to the current organ shortage worldwide the contribution of this procedure should not be disregarded. Additionally, despite being limited, the existing research provided scanty evidence that organs retrieved from MAiD donors are associated with satisfactory graft function and survival rates and that outcomes from transplant recipients are comparable to those of organs from donation following brain death and may be better than those of organs from other types of donation after circulatory determined death. Still, further studies are required for comprehensive and reliable evidence.     

Use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients with pre-existing type 2 or post-transplantation diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

IntroductionSodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated kidney, cardiovascular and mortality benefits in the general population; however, the evidence is limited in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current efficacy and safety data of SGLT2 inhibitors in adult kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplant recipients with pre-existing type 2 or post-transplantation diabetes mellitus.MethodWe searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub, CENTRAL, CDSR, EMBASE, CINAHL, and sources of unpublished literature. All primary interventional and observational studies on SGLT2 inhibitors in transplant recipients were included. Clinical outcomes included mortality, cardiovascular and kidney events, and adverse events such as graft rejection. Surrogate markers including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight reduction were also evaluated.ResultsOf the 17 studies that were included in this systematic review, there were 15 studies on kidney transplant recipients (n = 2417 patients) and two studies on heart transplant recipients (n = 122 patients). There was only one randomized controlled trial which evaluated 49 kidney transplant patients over 24 weeks. Overall, studies were heterogeneous in study design, sample size, duration of diabetes, time to SGLT2 inhibitor initiation post-transplantation (ranging from 0.88 to 11 years post kidney transplant; five to 5.7 years post heart transplant) and follow-up (ranging from 0.4 to 5.25 years in kidney transplant patients; 0.75 to one year in heart transplant patients). Only one retrospective study evaluated mortality as a part of a composite outcome in kidney transplant patients; however, study limitations restrict generalizability of results. Overall, studies could not confirm clinical cardiovascular and kidney benefits in the transplant population. Findings suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors may improve glycemic control; however, they are associated with urinary tract infection. Diabetic ketoacidosis and acute kidney injury also occurred in these studies, with precipitating factors such as infection and acute heart failure exacerbation.ConclusionsWhile SGLT2 inhibitors are promising agents with expanding indications in the non-transplant population, these agents may not be suitable for all solid organ transplant recipients, and close monitoring (e.g. for urinary tract infections) and patient education (e.g. sick day management) are essential if these agents are initiated. Evidence is based on short-term findings and suggests an association with hemoglobin A1c reduction and increased adverse events. Further long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on clinically important outcomes, including mortality reduction, in solid organ transplant recipients.     

Outcomes of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation in Recipients of a Previous Non‐Renal Solid Organ Transplant

Children who receive a non‐renal solid organ transplant may develop secondary renal failure requiring kidney transplantation. We investigated outcomes of 165 pediatric kidney transplant recipients who previously received a heart, lung, or liver transplant using data from 1988 to 2012 reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing. Patient and allograft survival were compared with 330 matched primary kidney transplant (PKT) recipients. Kidney transplantation after solid organ transplant (KASOT) recipients experienced similar allograft survival: 5‐ and 10‐year graft survival was 78% and 60% in KASOT recipients, compared to 80% and 61% in PKT recipients (p = 0.69). However, KASOT recipients demonstrated worse 10‐year patient survival (75% KASOT vs. 97% PKT, p < 0.001). Competing risks analysis indicated that KASOT recipients more often experienced graft loss due to patient death (p < 0.001), whereas allograft failure per se was more common in PKT recipients (p = 0.01). To study more recent outcomes, kidney transplants performed from 2006 to 2012 were separately investigated. Since 2006, KASOT and PKT recipients had similar 5‐year graft survival (82% KASOT vs. 83% PKT, p = 0.48), although 5‐year patient survival of KASOT recipients remained inferior (90% KASOT vs. 98% PKT, p < 0.001). We conclude that despite decreased patient survival, kidney allograft outcomes in pediatric KASOT recipients are comparable to those of PKT recipients.     

Symptomatic atherosclerotic vascular disease and graft survival in primary kidney transplant recipients – Observational analysis of the united network of organ sharing database

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate whether symptomatic atherosclerotic vascular disease (SAVD) was associated with graft survival in primary kidney transplant recipients.Summary background dataRecipient atherosclerotic vascular disease is associated with increased mortality rates amongst renal transplant patients. However, its relationship with graft survival has not been well studied.MethodsThis retrospective observational analysis was performed using data for adult kidney transplant recipients between 11/09/2000 and 28/02/2020 extracted from the UNOS national organ transplantation database. Patients were divided into two groups based on recipient history of symptomatic atherosclerotic disease (angina or peripheral vascular disease). Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed by multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for both donor and recipient characteristics.Results11,771 adult kidney transplant recipients from the UNOS database were eligible for analysis (1543 had a history of SAVD, 10,228 did not have a history of SAVD). After adjusting for confounders, positive SAVD status was associated with an adverse effect on graft survival at both 1 year (HR 1.35, p < 0.001) and 10 years (HR 1.15, p < 0.001).ConclusionsSAVD should be considered an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in patients undergoing kidney transplant.     

Kidney transplant outcomes after medical assistance in dying

IntroductionAfter nearly four years of Canadian experience with medical assistance in dying (MAID), the clinical volume of organ transplantation following MAID remains low. This is the first Canadian report evaluating recipient outcomes from kidney transplantation following MAID.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of the first nine cases of kidney transplants following MAID at a Canadian transplant center.ResultsNine patients underwent MAID followed by kidney retrieval during the study period. Their diagnoses were largely neuromuscular diseases. The mean warm ischemic time was 20 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 7). The nine recipients had a mean age of 60 (SD 19.7). The mean cold ischemic time was 525 minutes (SD 126). Delayed graft function occurred in only one patient out of nine. The mean 30-day creatinine was 124 umol/L (SD 52). The mean three-month creatinine was 115 umol/L (SD 29).ConclusionsWe report nine cases of kidney transplantation following MAID. The process minimized warm ischemia, resulting in low delayed graft function rates, and acceptable post-transplant outcomes. Further large-scale research is necessary to optimize processes and outcomes in this novel clinical pathway.     

Solid‐Organ Transplantation in Older Adults: Current Status and Future Research

An increasing number of patients older than 65 years are referred for and have access to organ transplantation, and an increasing number of older adults are donating organs. Although short‐term outcomes are similar in older versus younger transplant recipients, older donor or recipient age is associated with inferior long‐term outcomes. However, age is often a proxy for other factors that might predict poor outcomes more strongly and better identify patients at risk for adverse events. Approaches to transplantation in older adults vary across programs, but despite recent gains in access and the increased use of marginal organs, older patients remain less likely than other groups to receive a transplant, and those who do are highly selected. Moreover, few studies have addressed geriatric issues in transplant patient selection or management, or the implications on health span and disability when patients age to late life with a transplanted organ. This paper summarizes a recent trans‐disciplinary workshop held by ASP, in collaboration with NHLBI, NIA, NIAID, NIDDK and AGS, to address issues related to kidney, liver, lung, or heart transplantation in older adults and to propose a research agenda in these areas.     

Retrospective Investigation of Grafted Kidney Function After Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade Using Neostigmine or Sugammadex

IntroductionSugammadex has the steroid-encapsulating effect that reverses neuromuscular block induced by aminosteroid neuromuscular-blocking agents. Sugammadex can interact with other drugs that have the same steroidal structure with rocuronium, such as corticosteroids. Corticosteroids play a crucial role in the immunosuppression of kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are any differences in grafted kidney function in recipients of kidney transplantation when sugammadex or neostigmine is given to the recipient.MethodsThe study included 42 recipients of kidney transplant, with complete, readable medical charts and anesthetic records. Fourteen recipients’ neuromuscular block was reversed with sugammadex (group S) and 28 recipients’ neuromuscular block was reversed with neostigmine (group N). We tested noninferiority for serum creatinine during the preoperative period and 5 days after transplantation. Short-term (28 days) outcomes of kidney transplantations were assessed by the incidence of acute rejection episodes, graft failure, length of stay at hospital, and mortality.ResultsThere were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, serum creatinine values, short-term outcomes, and graft survival rates at 28 days’ postoperatively between group S and group N (P > .05).ConclusionsOur data showed no difference in risk of serious adverse effects on short-term graft functions in patients who underwent kidney transplantation. However, considering the sugammadex-corticosteroids interaction, the immunosuppression and long-term effects on grafted kidney functions, current safety experience is insufficient to support the recommendation of routine sugammadex use in this population. These results need to be confirmed by sufficiently powered, controlled, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic studies on larger patient populations.     

Transmission of malaria tertiana by multi-organ donation

In this report, transmission of malaria via a liver, a kidney, and possibly a heart allograft from a single donor is described. The donor had immigrated from Cameroon to Germany 18 months before, but had no clinical signs of active malaria infection. The liver transplant recipient and one of the two kidney transplant patients developed febrile illness with the appearance of Plasmodium vivax in blood smears 5 and 6 wk after transplantation, respectively. In the heart transplant recipient, a subclinical malaria infection was suspected based on a rise of malaria antibodies late after transplantation, whereas the recipient of the second kidney allograft had no clinical or laboratory evidence of malaria. Both liver and kidney recipients with active malaria responded to medical treatment. However, the liver transplant patient developed progressive cholestasis and died 5 months after transplantation from liver failure possibly due to side effects of the malaria medication. Other cases of malaria in solid organ recipients are briefly reviewed.     

Outcomes of Living Kidney Transplantation for Mitochondrial Disease Patients: A Case Series

PurposeMitochondrial disease can affect many organs, including the brain, nerves, heart, liver, eyes, ears, pancreas, and kidneys. Kidney transplantation is a treatment option for renal failure due to mitochondrial disease; however, the prognosis of patients who undergo kidney transplantation for mitochondrial disease is unknown. Here we evaluated the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with mitochondrial disease.MethodsClinical data were obtained from 4 kidney transplantation recipients who were followed at our department. Of the 4 transplantations, 3 were performed in our department: 2 patients received kidneys from their fathers, and a third from his wife. The fourth recipient received a kidney from her mother—who had a mitochondrial genetic abnormality—at another hospital. Of the 4 recipients, 3 were diagnosed with mitochondrial disease before the transplantation, and the fourth was diagnosed after. All recipients had sensorineural deafness and diabetes mellitus, and only 1 had a history of encephalopathy and stroke-like episodes before the transplantation.ResultsOne patient died 2 years after transplantation due to encephalopathy progression with stable kidney function. The grafted kidney of the patient who received it from her mother lost function at 5 years post-transplantation. A graft biopsy revealed focal segmental glomerular sclerosis due to mitochondrial disease. The other patients’ kidney functions remained stable. None of the recipients experienced rejection.ConclusionsIn kidney transplantation for mitochondrial disease, attention should be paid to the exacerbation of comorbidities, while careful consideration should be given to donors with a mitochondrial genetic abnormality.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk for hypertension and cardiovascular disease. To assist in their management, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has become increasingly used in both clinical research settings and practice. ABPM has been used to better define post-transplant hypertension incidence and prevalence in different solid organ transplantation populations. ABPM provides additional information on cardiovascular risk beyond that obtained by clinic-based readings, based on its ability to assess 24-h blood pressure (BP) load, detect nocturnal non-dipping, and predict target organ damage. It has provided some assurance about the safety of living kidney donation. Information from ABPM can be used to guide living kidney donor selection, and because ABPM-related data has been correlated with clinically important kidney and heart transplant recipient outcomes, it may be a valuable adjunct in their management. Despite these advantages, barriers to wider use of ABPM include expense, clinical inertia in hypertension management, lack of prospective clinical trial data, and clinical problems that compete with hypertension for attention such as acute or chronic allograft dysfunction. The increasing amount of research and clinical use for ABPM may allow for closer assessment and intervention to help address the increased cardiovascular risk faced by many solid organ transplant recipients.     

Health-related quality of life before and after solid organ transplantation. Measurement consideration,reported outcomes,and future directions

The initial focus in organ transplantation clinical research was demonstrating acceptable technical and survival outcomes. Both patient and graft survival have reached well-documented, laudable levels, and solid organ (liver, heart, kidney, lung) transplantation procedures are now relatively common. As with any complex medical procedure that entails relatively high risk, financial costs, and life-long follow-up care, reliable and valid assessments of the "quality" of the extended life years are of interest to patients, their families, policy makers, and payers. This review focuses on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional performance in adults following solid organ transplantation, with an emphasis on: 1) instruments and methods; 2) outcomes in liver, heart, kidney, and lung transplant recipients; and 3) future research directions. Practical considerations for developing longitudinal HRQOL assessment strategies are reviewed. The current emphasis on modeling demographic and clinical factors that promote or limit optimal HRQOL is illustrated. These lines of research will help identify potential interventions designed to promote better HRQOL in organ transplant recipients.     

The use of donor and recipient screening for toxoplasma in the era of universal trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmosis is a serious complication of solid organ transplantation. The highest risk of infection and disease occurs in heart recipients with primary infection transmitted by a seropositive donor to a seronegative recipient (donor-recipient mismatch). Toxoplasmosis has been reported to occur in noncardiac transplant recipients; however, no large studies examining the frequency of such events or the need for serologic screening exist. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1,006 solid organ transplant recipients transplanted in our center between 1984 and 1997 was performed to examine the incidence of Toxoplasma seroconversion, reactivation, and clinical toxoplasmosis and to evaluate the impact of trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis on these outcomes. RESULTS: Pretransplant Toxoplasma seroprevalence was 13.4% in donors and 17.8% in recipients. The incidence of Toxoplasma donor-recipient mismatch was 9.5% during the 14-year study period, and only 39.1% of mismatched recipients received TMP/SMX prophylaxis. Only four patients seroconverted, of whom two had received prophylaxis. There were no cases of clinical disease; either primary or reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: We therefore conclude that in transplant centers with low Toxoplasma seroprevalence, routine screening for Toxoplasma in solid organ donors and recipients is not necessary, particularly in the era of routine TMP/SMX prophylaxis.     

Evolution of Anxious-Depressive Symptomatology in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: Hospitalization and 12-Month Post-Transplantation Phases

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the evolution (hospitalization in the transplantation unit and at 12 months post-transplantation) of anxious and depressive symptomatology in cadaveric transplant recipients as a function of type of organ implanted (liver or kidney).MethodsUsing a 2 × 2 mixed factorial design, 2 groups were selected: 34 liver transplant recipients and 41 kidney transplant recipients. Both groups were assessed in 2 phases: (1) in the transplantation unit after discharge from the intensive care unit; and (2) 12 months after discharge from the hospital following implantation surgery. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Scale for the Assessment of Social Support were administered. A mixed analysis of covariance was used to assess the influence on transplant recipients' anxious-depressive symptomatology of 2 independent factors: phase (hospitalization in the transplantation unit and at 12 months post-transplantation) and organ (liver and kidney). Perceived social support and age were included as covariates in the analyses. We also calculated d and w as effect size indexes.ResultsInteractive effects of the factors phase and organ were found in the variable anxiety (P = .005). Specifically, the following simple effects were significant: (1) kidney transplant recipients presented more anxious symptomatology while hospitalized in the transplantation unit than at 12 months post-transplantation (P = .001; d = 0.52; medium effect size); and (2) kidney transplant recipients presented more anxious symptomatology than liver transplant recipients while hospitalized in the transplantation unit (P = .013; d = ?0.59; medium effect size). No statistically significant effect was obtained for the variable depression.ConclusionWorse mental health (anxious symptoms) was associated with kidney transplant recipients but not with liver recipients while recovering from the implantation surgery in the transplantation unit.     

Allowing HIV‐Positive Organ Donation: Ethical,Legal and Operational Considerations

Case reports of kidney transplantation using HIV‐positive (HIV+) donors in South Africa and advances in the clinical care of HIV+ transplant recipients have drawn attention to the legal prohibition of transplanting organs from HIV+ donors in the United States. For HIV+ transplant candidates, who face high barriers to transplant access, this prohibition violates beneficence by placing an unjustified limitation on the organ supply. However, transplanting HIV+ organs raises nonmaleficence concerns given limited data on recipient outcomes. Informed consent and careful monitoring of outcome data should mitigate these concerns, even in the rare circumstance when an HIV+ organ is intentionally transplanted into an HIV‐negative recipient. For potential donors, the federal ban on transplanting HIV+ organs raises justice concerns. While in practice there are a number of medical criteria that preclude organ donation, only HIV+ status is singled out as a mandated exclusion to donation under the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA). Operational objections could be addressed by adapting existing approaches used for organ donors with hepatitis. Center‐specific outcomes should be adjusted for HIV donor and recipient status. In summary, transplant professionals should advocate for eliminating the ban on HIV+ organ donation and funding studies to determine outcomes after transplantation of these organs.     

Donors With Immune Thrombocytopenia: Do They Pose a Risk to Transplant Recipients?

Transplant‐mediated alloimmune thrombocytopenia (TMAT) from donors with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) can result in significant bleeding complications in the recipient. The risk to a recipient of TMAT if they receive an organ from a donor with ITP is unknown. The outcomes of recipients of organs from deceased donors with ITP recorded in the UK Transplant Registry between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed. Twenty‐one deceased organ donors had a predonation diagnosis of ITP. These donors were significantly more likely to have died from intracranial hemorrhage than were all other deceased organ donors (85% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Organs from donors with ITP resulted in 49 organ transplants (31 kidney, 14 liver, four heart), with only one case of TMAT, which occurred in a liver transplant recipient and resulted in death from bleeding complications 18 days posttransplantation. The recipient of a kidney from the same organ donor was not affected. Unadjusted 5‐year patient and graft survival was significantly worse for liver transplant recipients from donors with ITP compared with liver transplant recipients from donors without ITP (64% vs. 85%, p = 0.012). Organs from donors with ITP may be considered for transplantation, but livers should be used with caution.     

Fertility following solid organ transplantation

Fertility is usually restored in women after solid organ transplantation, and successful pregnancies have been reported in female recipients of kidney, liver, heart, pancreas-liver, and lung transplants. However, women with solid organ allografts have higher incidence of pregnancy complications like hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm delivery. Hypertension appears to be dependent on the type of immunosuppressive agents. The influence of pregnancy on the risk of rejection is poorly known on the basis of available data. Rejection rate appears to be at least similar to the nonpregnant population. In some cases, such as in liver transplant pregnant women, even higher as compared to the nonpregnant population. Maintaining appropriate blood levels of immunosuppressive drugs is currently recommended. Malformation rate in the offsprings of transplanted women appears to not be increased; long-term follow- up of children born to allograft recipients is necessary to investigate possible developmental, immunological, or oncological disorders. We followed 70 pregnancies after kidney transplantation and nine after liver transplantation. All recipients were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy during pregnancy, except one mother who refused immunosuppression and experienced transplant rejection. Hypertension was the most frequent complication during pregnancy: in 23% of kidney transplantated mothers and in one out of nine liver transplant recipients. The only malformation observed in the newborns was the dislocation of the hip in the child of a kidney transplant recipient.     

Literature Review of Passenger Lymphocyte Syndrome Following Renal Transplantation and Two Case Reports

Passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) is an immune‐mediated hemolysis. It occurs following ABO blood group mismatched solid organ and/or bone marrow transplantation between donor and recipient. We report two cases of PLS occurring after renal transplantation. Both recipients received live related kidney transplants; one from his mother and the other from his brother. The direction of blood group transfer, from donor to recipient, was O Rh D+ to A Rh D+ in both cases. Approximately 12 days after transplantation, both recipients showed a rapid fall in their hemoglobin levels with no identifiable bleeding source. DAT positive hemolysis was confirmed and anti‐A antibodies were detected in recipient sera, confirming a diagnosis of PLS. Both cases required blood transfusion support to maintain their hemoglobin and both had good renal outcomes. We have identified 99 PLS cases following renal transplant in the English literature. Previous ABO sensitization, donor blood group O to recipient blood group A or B transfer, and ciclosporin treatment have been identified as risk factors for PLS. Clinical outcomes in general are good; nonetheless, cases of graft failure and deaths have been reported. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are important in at risk individuals.     

Clinical factors associated with graft fibrosis in kidney-transplant recipients on steroid-avoidance immunosuppression

Abstract: Background: Recent studies have documented good patient and graft outcomes and a low risk of acute rejection with steroid‐avoidance immunosuppression in kidney‐transplant recipients, but the risk of progressive graft fibrosis is not well studied. Methods: All adult primary kidney transplant or combined kidney and pancreas transplant recipients on steroid avoidance immunosuppression were eligible for study. All recipients received induction with antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab. Corticosteroids were stopped after day 4 post‐transplantation. Patients were maintained with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol biopsies were done at reperfusion and at one, four, and 12 months after transplantation. Results: Eighty one‐yr protocol biopsies with adequate specimens were obtained from 132 kidney or kidney–pancreas transplant recipients. Fifteen (19%) of the biopsies showed moderate to severe graft interstitial fibrosis (GIF) (Banff ci score ≥2). Recipients with GIF were older, had lower body mass index, greater human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, older donors, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL at one month, a Banff ci score >0 on one‐month biopsy, BK nephropathy, and interstitial cellular infiltrates on the one‐yr biopsy. In the unadjusted logistic regression analysis, BK nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL at one month, recipient age, Banff ci score >0 on one‐month biopsy, and donor age were the only variables associated with a higher risk of GIF on the one‐year biopsy. In the multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for these variables, BK nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL at one month after transplantation, and recipient age were independently associated with the risk of GIF on the one‐year biopsy. Conclusion: In this small study of primary kidney or combined kidney–pancreas transplant recipients on steroid‐avoidance immunosuppression, we found that 19% had GIF on a one‐year protocol biopsy. BK nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL one month after transplantation, and recipient age correlated with an increased risk for GIF on the one‐yr biopsy.     

Efficacy of valganciclovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus disease in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is relatively common following solid organ transplant, particularly if a serologically negative recipient receives an organ from a serologically positive donor (D+/R-). Although valganciclovir is approved for the treatment of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients and is used for the prophylaxis against CMV infection in solid organ transplant patients, the current standard treatment for CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients remains intravenous ganciclovir. We retrospectively reviewed our experience using valganciclovir as treatment for CMV disease in CMV D+/R- kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients from March 2002 to June 2005. A total of 37 cases with primary CMV disease were diagnosed and treated with either intravenous ganciclovir as induction followed with valganciclovir or valganciclovir from the beginning. We compared clinical outcomes and viremia between the two groups. Our data suggest that valganciclovir is an effective treatment modality for primary CMV disease in kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients. It led to the resolution of disease and undetectable viremia. Valganciclovir allowed for early initiation of treatment and for treatment to be given as an outpatient. These advantages of valganciclovir have both health and economic impact for patients with CMV disease.