Computed Tomography Evaluation of In Vivo Pulmonary Cryoablation Zone Sizes

PurposeTo evaluate ablation zone sizes in patients undergoing pulmonary tumor cryoablation with 14-gauge cryoablation probes.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent cryoablation of pulmonary tumors with 1 or more 14-gauge probes (August 2017 to June 2020) was performed. Intraprocedural and 1–2-month postprocedural chest computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated to characterize pulmonary lesions, ice balls, and ablation zones. Single-probe 14-gauge ablation zone volumes were compared with manufacturer reference isotherms and single- and 2-probe ablation zones from a prior investigation of 17-gauge probes. Overall survival and local recurrence–free survival were calculated to 3 years.ResultsForty-seven pulmonary malignancies in 42 patients (women, 50%; mean age, 75.2 years ± 11.5) underwent cryoablation with 1 (n = 35), 2 (n = 10), or 3 (n = 2) cryoablation probes. One- to 2-month follow-up CT images were available for 30 of the 42 patients. The mean cryoablation zone volumes at 1–2 months when 1 (n = 21), 2 (n = 8), and 3 (n = 1) probes were used were 5.0 cm³ ± 2.3, 37.5 cm³ ± 20.5, and 28.4 cm³, respectively. The mean single-probe follow-up ablation zone volume was larger than that previously reported for 17-gauge probes (3.0 cm³ ± 0.3) (P < .001) but smaller than manufacturer-reported isotherms (11.6 cm³ for ?40 °C isotherm) and the 2-probe ablation zone volume with 17-gauge devices (12.9 cm³ ± 2.4) (for all, P < 001). The 3-year overall survival and local recurrence–free survival were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%–89%) and 87% (95% CI, 74%–100%), respectively.ConclusionsFourteen-gauge probes generate larger ablation volumes than those generated by 17-gauge probes. Manufacturer-reported isotherms are significantly larger than actual cryoablation zones. Cryoablation can attain low rates of local recurrence.     

Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation of Adrenal Metastases: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablation of adrenal metastases through a meta-analysis of various image-guided percutaneous ablation techniques.Materials and MethodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed for studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of image-guided percutaneous ablation of adrenal metastases. A total of 37 studies published between 2009 and 2020 were analyzed, comprising a sample size of 959 patients. Proportion estimates of overall survival, local control, and toxicity were analyzed in a pooled meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of adverse events after ablation was calculated based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grading.ResultsOf the 959 included patients, 320 (33.3%) underwent radiofrequency ablation, 72 (7.5%) microwave ablation, 95 (9.9%) cryoablation, and 46 (4.8%) ethanol injections for treatment of adrenal metastases. The remaining 426 (44.4%) patients were from studies involving a mixture of the 4 listed percutaneous ablation techniques. The pooled 1-year local control rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76%–83%). The pooled 1-year overall survival rate was 77% (95% CI, 70%–83%). The overall rate of severe adverse events after ablation (CTCAE grade 3 or higher) was 16.1%. The overall rate of low-grade adverse events after ablation (CTCAE grade 2 or lower) was 32.6%. Approximately 21.9% (n = 203) of patients experienced intraprocedural hypertensive crises, the majority of which were reversed with antihypertensive medications.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that image-guided percutaneous ablation can be effective in achieving acceptable short- to mid-term local tumor control and overall survival with a moderate safety profile.     

Radiofrequency Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplant: An Analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

PurposeTo evaluate differences in waitlist mortality and dropout in liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo radiofrequency (RF) ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).Material and MethodsFrom 2004 to 2013, 11,824 patients with HCC in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients who underwent RF ablation or TACE were included and followed until December 31, 2019, or 5 years, whichever came first, and were stratified by the Milan criteria. Competing risk and Cox regression analyses to compare waitlist mortality and dropout were performed using adjusted hazard ratios (asHRs, with RF ablation group as reference). Regression models were adjusted for age, race, sex, calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, tumor size, and number.ResultsThere was no difference in waitlist mortality and dropout for patients outside the Milan criteria (n = 1,226) who underwent TACE (19.2%) or RF ablation (19.0%) (asHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79–1.03). There was also no difference for patients inside the Milan criteria (n = 10,598) in waitlist mortality/dropout (TACE 13.4% vs RF ablation 12.9%) (asHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.79–2.09). A subgroup analysis within the Milan criteria demonstrated no difference between TACE and RF ablation treatments in patients with a single tumor of ≤3 cm (asHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77–1.10), with a single tumor of >3 cm (asHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79–1.34), or with >1 tumor (asHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72–1.09).ConclusionsUsing the national registry data, no difference was found in waitlist mortality and dropout for transplant candidates with HCC who received TACE versus RF ablation.     

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: National Treatment Trends and Outcomes Compared to Partial Nephrectomy and Thermal Ablation

PurposeTo assess use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and compare outcomes with thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy (PN).Materials and MethodsThe 2004–2015 National Cancer Database was investigated for histopathologically proven stage I RCC treated with PN, cryoablation, radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) ablation, or SBRT. Patients were propensity score–matched to account for potential confounders, including patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, tumor size, histology, grade, tumor sequence, administration of systemic therapy, treatment in academic vs nonacademic centers, treatment location, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 91,965 patients were identified (SBRT, n = 174; PN, n = 82,913; cryoablation, n = 5,446; RF/MW ablation, n = 3,432). Stage I patients who received SBRT tended to be older women with few comorbidities treated at nonacademic centers in New England states. After propensity score matching, a cohort of 636 patients was obtained with well-balanced confounders between treatment groups. In the matched cohort, OS after SBRT was inferior to OS after PN and thermal ablation (PN vs SBRT, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.46, P < .001; cryoablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.60, P < .001; RF/MW ablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.67, P < .001). Compared with PN, neither cryoablation nor RF/MW ablation showed significant difference in OS (cryoablation vs PN, HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.80–2.28, P = .258; RF/MW ablation vs PN, HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.95–2.55, P = .079).ConclusionsCurrent SBRT protocols show lower OS compared with thermal ablation and PN, whereas thermal ablation and PN demonstrate comparable outcomes.     

Radiofrequency Ablation,Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Evaluation of Therapeutic and Renal Function Outcomes

PurposeTo compare the therapeutic and renal function outcomes of radiofrequency (RF) ablation, cryoablation, and microwave (MW) ablation for treatment of T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and MethodsA retrospective assessment of 297 patients (mean age 72 years range 24–90 years) with biopsy-proven RCC treated with image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation was performed between October 2006 and December 2016. Mean tumor size was 2.4 cm; mean radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, hilar tumor touching the main renal artery or vein, and location relative to polar lines; Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical; and c-centrality scores were 6.0, 7.0, and 2.8, respectively. Assessments of adverse events, treatment efficacy, and therapeutic outcomes were performed among RF ablation, cryoablation, and MW ablation. The 2-year disease-free, metastatic-free, and cancer-specific survival rates were tabulated. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was used to assess for treatment related changes in renal function.ResultsA total of 297 T1aN0M0 biopsy-proven RCCs measuring 1.2–3.9 cm were treated with computed tomography–guided RF ablation (n = 244, 82%), cryoablation (n = 26, 9%), and MW ablation (n = 27, 9%). There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the 3 groups (P = .09). Technical success rates were similar among the 3 treatments (P = .33). Primary efficacy at 1 month postablation was more likely to be achieved with RF ablation and MW ablation than with cryoablation. At 2 years’ follow-up, there was no local recurrence, metastatic progression, or RCC-related death observed in the 3 groups. There was no significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate among the 3 ablation groups compared with baseline at 2-year follow-up (P = .71).ConclusionRF ablation, cryoablation, and MW ablation are equivalent at 2 years for treatment of T1a RCC for therapeutic outcome, stability of renal function, and low adverse event rate.     

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable,Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.Materials and MethodsTwenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsBefore PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21–1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20–1.32; P = .167).ConclusionsThe present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.     

Ablation Therapy for Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study

PurposeTo compare overall survival (OS) of ablation with no treatment for patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsPatients with clinical stage IIIB (T_1–4N₃M₀, T₄N₂M₀) and stage IV (T_1–4N_0–3M₁) non-small cell lung cancer, in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition, who did not receive treatment or who received ablation as their sole primary treatment besides chemotherapy from 2004 to 2014, were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated by log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score-matched analysis. Relative survival analyses comparing age- and sex-matched United States populations were performed.ResultsA total of 140,819 patients were included. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates relative to age- and sex-matched United States population were 28%, 18%, 12%, and 10%, respectively, for ablation (n = 249); and 30%, 15%, 9%, and 5%, respectively for no treatment (n = 140,570). Propensity score matching resulted in 249 patients in the ablation group versus 498 patients in the no-treatment group. After matching, ablation was associated with longer OS than that in the no-treatment group (median, 5.9 vs 4.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.844; 95% confidence interval, 0.719–0.990; P = .037). These results persisted in patients with an initial tumor size of ≤3 cm.ConclusionsPreliminary results suggest ablation may be associated with longer OS in patients with late-stage non-small cell lung cancer than survival in those who received no treatment.     

Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Underwent Microwave Ablation after Downstaging with Transarterial Chemoembolization to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A

PurposeTo compare the clinical results of microwave ablation (MWA) between patients downstaged to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage A with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and those initially classified as BCLC Stage A.Materials and MethodsFrom January 2012 to May 2017, 1,087 patients were reviewed retrospectively using propensity score matching (1:1): 86 patients underwent MWA as a curative treatment after downstaging to BCLC Stage A by TACE (downstaging group) and 86 patients initially classified as BCLC Stage A underwent MWA (control group). The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 groups were compared.ResultsThe 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95.3%, 79.1%, and 58.1%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 93.0%, 81.4%, and 61.6%, respectively, in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50–1.13; P = .162). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 80.2%, 50.0%, and 24.4%, respectively, in the downstaging group and 77.9%, 52.3%, and 27.9%, respectively, in the control group (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76–1.53; P = .678). No significant differences were found in OS and DFS.ConclusionsThe long-term prognosis in patients with HCC who underwent MWA after downstaging to BCLC Stage A using TACE was similar to that in patients with initial BCLC Stage A.     

Utility of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Neural Thermoprotection in Ablations of Musculoskeletal Tumors

PurposeTo characterize the utility of monitoring transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) for neural thermoprotection during musculoskeletal tumor ablations.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of 29 patients (16 male; median age, 46 y; range, 7–77 y) who underwent musculoskeletal tumor radiofrequency ablation (n = 8) or cryoablation (n = 22) with intraprocedural TCeMEP and SSEP monitoring was performed. The most common tumor histologies were osteoid osteoma (n = 6), venous malformation (n = 5), sarcoma (n = 5), renal cell carcinoma (n = 4), and non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 3). The most common tumor sites were spine (n = 22) and lower extremities (n = 4). Abnormal TCeMEP change was defined by 100-V increase above baseline threshold activation for a given myotome; abnormal SSEP change was defined by 60% reduction in baseline amplitude and/or 10% increase in latency.ResultsAbnormal changes in TCeMEP (n = 9; 30%) and/or SSEP (n = 5; 17%) occurred in 12 procedures (40%) and did not recover in 5 patients. Patients with unchanged TCeMEP/SSEP activities throughout the procedure (n = 18) did not have motor or sensory symptoms after the procedure; 3 (60%) with unrecovered activity changes and 2 (29%) with transient activity changes had new motor (n = 1) or sensory (n = 4) symptoms. Relative risk for neurologic sequelae for patients with unrecovered TCeMEP/SSEP changes vs those with transient or no changes was 7.50 (95% confidence interval, 1.66–33.9; P = .009).ConclusionsAbnormal activity changes of TCeMEP or SSEP during percutaneous ablative procedures correlate with postprocedural neurologic sequelae.     

Hypertensive Crisis during Microwave Ablation of Adrenal Neoplasms: A Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Factors

PurposeTo identify risk factors for hypertensive crisis (HC) during ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave (MW) ablation of adrenal neoplasms.Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent MW ablation for adrenal tumors between April 2006 and November 2017 were retrospectively identified for this study (51 consecutive patients; 35 males, 16 females; mean age, 55 years; range, 15–85 years). A total of 77 MW ablation treatments were performed for 67 tumors (24 primary [9 pheochromocytomas, 8 adenomas, and 7 cortical carcinomas]; and 43 metastases [22 hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 renal cell carcinoma, 5 non-small cell lung cancer, 4 colorectal cancer, 3 liposarcoma, and 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma]). The mean diameter of the adrenal tumors was 4.6 cm (range, 1.2–16.2 cm). Information about patient demographics, imaging studies, pathology and laboratory results, procedure records, and clinical outcomes was retrieved and analyzed. Statistical analysis was then performed to determine potential risk factors for HC.ResultsOf the 77 MW ablation procedures, HC occurred in 13 (16.9%). A significantly higher risk of HC was observed in patients with pheochromocytoma (odds ratio [OR], 9.037; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.731–47.172; P = .009), body mass index <24 kg/m² (OR, 5.167; 95% CI, 1.060–25.194; P = .042), dominant tumor size ≤4.5 cm (OR, 4.023; 95% CI, 1.011–16.005; P = .048), and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg (OR, 0.242; 95% CI, 0.068–0.861; P = .029).ConclusionHC can occur during MW ablation in patients with either primary or metastatic adrenal tumors. Pheochromocytoma, body mass index, tumor size, and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure appear to be significant risk factors for the occurrence of HC.     

γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase as a Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment serum γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) level in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving transarterial chemoembolization.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 140 patients (123 male, 17 female; mean age, 56.9 y ± 12.0; range, 22.0–82.0 y) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class C HCC who received first-line conventional chemoembolization between December 2013 and March 2018. Patients were divided into low and high GGT groups based on a cutoff value calculated with a receiver operating characteristic curve. Overall survival (OS) was compared between groups by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.ResultsThe optimal cutoff values of GGT were 119.5 U/L in men and 175.0 U/L in women. The 6-, 9-, and 12-mo OS rates were 81.7%, 72.4%, and 62.9%, respectively, for patients in the low GGT group (n = 44) and 58.8%, 35.7%, and 28.8%, respectively, for patients in the high GGT group (n = 96; P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified high pretreatment serum GGT level (hazard ratio [HR], 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67–4.40; P < .001), multiple tumors (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.23–7.53; P = .02), and performance of target treatment (ie, sorafenib; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24–0.72; P = .002) or ablation (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18–0.66; P = .001) as independent prognostic factors for OS.ConclusionsPretreatment serum GGT level was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced HCC treated with chemoembolization, suggesting that GGT is a useful prognostic biomarker for advanced HCC.     

Yttrium-90 Radioembolization and Concomitant Systemic Gemcitabine,Cisplatin, and Capecitabine as the First-Line Therapy for Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo determine the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) combined with systemic gemcitabine, cisplatin, and capecitabine for the first-line treatment of locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).Materials and MethodsData of 13 patients with treatment-naïve, locally advanced iCCA treated with a downstaging protocol using gemcitabine, cisplatin, TARE, and capecitabine were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local tumor response (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), progression-free survival (PFS), technical adverse events, and toxicity were measured.ResultsCalculated from the time of diagnosis, the median OS was 29 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15 to not reached), with a 1-year OS of 84.6% (95% CI, 52.2%–95.9%) and 2-year OS of 52.9% (95% CI, 20.3%–77.5%). The median OS values were 24 months (95% CI, 8 to not reached) and 21 months (95% CI, 5 to not reached) from the time of initial cycle of chemotherapy and TARE, respectively. Patients who were downstaged to surgery (n = 7, 53.8%) had a more favorable OS (median OS, not reached vs 15 months; P = .0221). Complete and partial radiologic responses were achieved in 5 (38.5%) and 6 (46.2%) patients, respectively. The median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 12 to not reached). Although no serum toxicity with Grade >2 occurred within 3 months after TARE, 1 patient was no longer a surgical candidate given suboptimal nutrition status despite successful downstage on imaging studies. Two patients required a reduced dose or delay of post-TARE chemotherapy.ConclusionsFirst-line combination therapy with TARE and systemic gemcitabine, cisplatin, and capecitabine is an effective treatment with an acceptable safety profile for iCCA with a high rate of downstaging to resection.     

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Appendicular Skeleton Chondroblastoma—an Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Center

PurposeTo evaluate safety and long-term efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in treatment of chondroblastoma.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective analysis comprised 27 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven chondroblastoma treated by RF ablation. The tumors were located in the proximal humerus (n = 6), proximal tibia (n = 8), proximal femur (n = 6), distal femur (n = 5), acromion process (n = 1), and lunate (n = 1). In 19 patients (70.3%), the tumor was in the weight-bearing area of the bone. Clinical response was assessed by comparing pain scores and functional assessment by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score before and after ablation. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year to rule out complications and recurrence.ResultsTechnical success rate was 100%. Mean pain score before the procedure was 7.34 (range, 7–9); all patients experienced a reduction in pain, with 25 (92.6%) patients reporting complete pain relief at 6 weeks. Mean MSTS score before the procedure was 15.4, whereas mean MSTS score at 6 weeks after the procedure was 28.6, suggesting significant functional improvement (P < .0001). Two patients developed osteonecrosis and collapse of the treated bone. There were no recurrences.ConclusionsPercutaneous RF ablation is a safe and effective option for treating chondroblastoma of the appendicular skeleton.     

Direct-Acting Antivirals Improve Overall Survival in Interventional Oncology Patients with Hepatitis C and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo investigate the impact of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and 12-week sustained virologic response (SVR12) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by interventional oncology (IO) therapies.Materials and MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients diagnosed from 2005 to 2016 with HCC and receiving IO therapies. A total of 478 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were age 29–90 years (mean 63.6 ± 9.4 years) and 78.9% (n =3 77) male. Two hundred and eighty-five (57%) patients had chronic HCV, 93 (33%) received DAAs, and 63 (68%) achieved SVR12. Liver function, tumor characteristics, and IO therapy including ablation, image-guided transcatheter tumor therapies (ITTT) (eg, chemoembolization and radioembolization), and combination locoregional therapy were assessed in analysis.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 26.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9–29.9). OS for ablation, combination locoregional therapy and ITTT, was 37.3 (CI 30.7–49.9), 29.3 (CI 24.2–38.0), and 19.7 months (CI 16.5–22.8), respectively (P < .0001). OS in patients with HCV was 30.7 months (CI 24.2–35.2) versus 22.2 months in non-HCV patients (CI 17.8–27.8, P = .03). Patients with HCV who received DAA had higher survival, 49.2 months (CI 36.5–not reached) versus those not receiving DAA, 18.5 months (CI 14.1–25.3, P < .0001). OS was 71.8 months (CI 42.3–not reached) for patients who achieved SVR12 after DAA versus 26.7 months in the non-SVR12 group (CI 15.9–31.1, P < .0001). Multivariable analysis revealed independent factors for OS including IO treatment type, DAA use and achieving SVR12 (P < .05).ConclusionsDAA use and SVR12 is associated with higher OS in patients with HCV-related HCC treated by IO therapies.     

Safety and Efficacy of Retrograde Pyeloperfusion for Ureteral Protection during Renal Tumor Cryoablation

PurposeTo determine safety and efficacy of retrograde pyeloperfusion for ureteral protection during cryoablation of adjacent renal tumors.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of 155 patients treated with renal cryoablation, including adjunctive retrograde pyeloperfusion, from 2005 to 2019 was performed. Ice contacted the ureter in 67 of the 155 patients who represented the study cohort. Median patient age was 68 years old (interquartile range [61, 74]), 52 patients (78%) were male, and 37 tumors (55%) were clear cell histology. Mean tumor size was 3.4 ± 1.3 cm, and 42 tumors (63%) were located at the lower pole. Treatment-related complication and oncologic outcomes were recorded based on a review of post-procedural images and chart review.ResultsTechnical success of cryoablation was attained in 67 cases (100%), and technical success of pyeloperfusion was attained in 66 cases (99%). A total of 13 patients (19.4%) experienced SIR major C or D complications related to the procedure, including hemorrhage (n = 4), urine leak (n = 3), transient urinary obstruction (n = 2), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), hypertensive urgency (n = 1), acute respiratory failure (n = 1), and ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stricture (n = 1). No complications were attributable to pyeloperfusion. Three of 45 patients with biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma experienced local recurrence resulting in local recurrence-free survival of 92% (95% confidence interval, 81.5%–100%) 3 years after ablation.ConclusionsRetrograde pyeloperfusion of the renal collecting system is a relatively safe and efficacious option for ureteral protection during renal tumor cryoablation. This adjunctive procedure should be considered for patients in whom cryoablation of a renal mass could potentially involve the ureter.     

Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Image-Guided Thermal Ablation of Juxtacardiac Lung Tumors

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) for juxtacardiac lung tumors.Materials and MethodsThis bi-institutional retrospective cohort study included 23 consecutive patients (13 [57%] male; mean age, 55 years ± 18) with 30 juxtacardiac lung tumors located ≤10 mm from the pericardium treated in 28 IGTA sessions (25 sessions of cryoablation and 3 sessions of microwave ablation) between April 2008 and August 2022. The primary outcome was any adverse cardiac event within 90 days after ablation. Secondary outcomes included noncardiac adverse events, local tumor progression–free survival (LT-PFS), and the cumulative incidence of local tumor progression with death as a competing risk. Two tumors treated without curative intent or follow-up imaging were considered in the safety analysis but not in the progression analysis.ResultsThe median imaging follow-up duration was 22 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10–53 months). Primary technical success was achieved in 25 (89%) ablations. No adverse cardiac events attributable to IGTA occurred. One patient experienced a phrenic nerve injury. The median LT-PFS duration was 59 months (IQR, 32–73 months). At 1, 3, and 5 years, LT-PFS was 90% (95% CI, 78%–100%), 74% (CI, 53%–100%), and 45% (CI, 20%–97%), respectively, and the cumulative incidence of local tumor progression was 4.3% (CI, 0.29%–19%), 11% (CI, 1.6%–30%), and 26% (CI, 3.3%–58%), respectively.ConclusionsIGTA is safe and effective for lung tumors located ≤10 mm from the pericardium. No adverse cardiac events were not observed within 90 days after ablation.     

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block for Adjunctive Analgesia during Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis

PurposeTo determine whether hepatic hilar nerve block techniques reduce analgesic and sedation requirements during percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of hepatic tumors.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort analysis was performed of 177 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 33–86 years) who underwent percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors. All patients were treated utilizing local anesthetic and moderate sedation between November 2018 and November 2021 at a tertiary level hospital, with or without the administration of a hepatic hilar nerve block. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the administration of the hilar nerve block and fentanyl and midazolam dosages.ResultsA total of 114 (64%) patients received a hilar nerve block in addition to procedural sedation, and 63 (36%) patients received procedural sedation alone. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic and tumor characteristics between the cohorts. The procedure duration was longer in the hilar block cohort than in the unblocked cohort (median, 95 vs 82 minutes; P = .0012). The technical success rate (98% in both the cohorts, P = .93) and adverse event rate (11% vs 3%, P = .14) were not significantly different between the cohorts. After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, ablation modality, and procedure and ablation durations, hilar nerve blocks were associated with lower fentanyl (?18.4%, P = .0045) and midazolam (?22.7%, P = .0007) dosages.ConclusionsHepatic hilar nerve blocks significantly decrease the fentanyl and midazolam requirements during thermal ablation of hepatic tumors, without a significant change in the technical success or adverse event rates.     

Yttrium-90 Radioembolization in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

PurposeTo report outcomes of yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and MethodsRetrospective review was performed of 115 patients at 6 tertiary care centers; 92 were treated with resin microspheres (80%), 22 were treated with glass microspheres (19%), and 1 was treated with both. Postintervention outcomes were compared between groups with χ² tests. Survival after diagnosis and after treatment was assessed by Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsGrade 3 laboratory toxicity was observed in 4 patients (4%); no difference in toxicity profile between resin and glass microspheres was observed (P = .350). Clinical toxicity per Society of Interventional Radiology criteria was noted in 29 patients (25%). Partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 was noted in 25% of patients who underwent embolization with glass microspheres and 3% of patients who were treated with resin microspheres (P = .008). Median overall survival (OS) from first diagnosis was 29 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21–37 mo) for all patients, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 85%, 31%, and 8%, respectively. Median OS after treatment was 11 months (95% CI, 8–13 mo), and 1- and 3-year OS rates were 44% and 4%, respectively. These estimates were not significantly different between resin and glass microspheres (P = .730 and P = .475, respectively). Five patients were able to undergo curative-intent resection after ⁹⁰Y radioembolization (4%).ConclusionsThis study provides observational data of treatment outcomes after ⁹⁰Y radioembolization in patients with unresectable ICC.     

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Thrombectomy (TIPS-Thrombectomy) for Symptomatic Acute Noncirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis

PurposeTo report the safety and effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and mechanical thrombectomy (TIPS-thrombectomy) for symptomatic acute noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (NC-PVT).Materials and MethodsPatients with acute NC-PVT who underwent TIPS-thrombectomy between 2014 and 2021 at a single academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two patients were included (men, 56%; median age, 51 years [range, 39–62 years]). The causes for PVT included idiopathic (n = 12), prothrombotic disorders (n = 11), postsurgical sequelae (n = 6), pancreatitis (n = 2), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 1). The indications for TIPS-thrombectomy included refractory abdominal pain (n = 14), intestinal venous ischemia (n = 9), ascites (n = 4), high-risk varices (n = 3), and variceal bleeding (n = 2). Variables studied included patient, disease, and procedure characteristics. Patients were monitored over the course of 1-year follow-up.ResultsSuccessful recanalization of occluded portal venous vessels occurred in all 32 patients (100%). Compared with pretreatment patency, recanalization with TIPS-thrombectomy resulted in an increase in patent veins (main portal vein [28% vs 97%, P < .001], superior mesenteric vein [13% vs 94%, P < .001], and splenic vein [66% vs 91%, P < .001]). Three procedure-related adverse events occurred (Society of Interventional Radiology grade 2 moderate). Hepatic encephalopathy developed in 1 (3%) of 32 patients after TIPS placement. At 1-year follow-up, return of symptoms occurred in 3 (9%) of 32 patients: (a) ascites (n = 1), (b) variceal bleeding (n = 1), and (c) intestinal venous ischemia (n = 1). The intention-to-treat 1-year portal vein and TIPS primary and secondary patency rates were 78% (25/32) and 100% (32/32), respectively. Seven patients required additional procedures, and the 1-year mortality rate was 3% (1/32).ConclusionsTIPS-thrombectomy is a safe and effective method for treating patients with symptomatic acute NC-PVT.     

Intra-Arterial Therapy for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), transarterial radioembolization, and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.MethodsA search was conducted on Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 20, 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for the median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SRs), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), whereas two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RRs) and conversion to resection rates (CRRs).ResultsA total of 71 prospective nonrandomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified, comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond the first-line, DEE-TACE + SCT (n = 152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.5–29.1) months and a 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95% CI, 21.8–25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE + SCT appeared to consistently have the highest pooled SRs at 1 year (81.9%) and 2 years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015–2020). DEE-TACE + SCT and HAI + SCT had the highest pooled RRs of 56.7% (I² = 0.90) and 62.6% (I² = 0.87) and pooled CRRs of 35.5% (I² = 0.00) and 30.3% (I² = 0.80), respectively.ConclusionsAlbeit significant heterogeneity, the paucity of high-quality evidence, and the noncomparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE + SCT have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.