The Effect of Glutathion S-Transferase Polymoprhisms and Anti-GSST1 Antibodies on Allograft Functions in Recipients of Renal Transplant

The balance between oxidative stress and anti-oxidant defense systems after renal transplantation may explain the development and progression of allograft dysfunction. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) decreases the damage from oxidative stress. In contrast, recipient antibodies against GSTT1 expressed on the graft are believed to cause its dysfunction. The aim of our research was to study the probable relationship to rejection between GST gene polymorphisms and anti-GSTT1 antibodies. We included 122 patients transplantations from living donors and 51 healthy individuals as controls group in our study. The patient groups were comprised of 57 patients who did and 65 who did not experienced rejection episode. Polymerase chain reactions were used to detect GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, whereas PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism), for GSTP1 polymorphism. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method was used for anti-GSTT1 antibody scans. There was no significant difference between the groups for allele and genotype frequencies of GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1 polymorphisms of the recipients, donors, and controls. Within the rejection group the frequency of patients with the GSTM1 null genotype was higher among subjects prescribed cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus (P = .029). Among the entire patient group, 46 subjects with GSTT1 null genotype were scanned for anti-GSTT1 antibody which was detected in 5 of 8 patients with an acute rejection episode (P = .04). Anti-GSTT1 antibody was observed more frequently albeit not significantly, among the cyclosporine versus tacrolimus patient group (P = .16). This study suggested that GSTM1 genotype may be important for cyclosporine detoxification and for allograft outcomes due to drug nephrotoxicity. After transplantation, antigens distinct from the HLA system such as GSTT1 protein may also be targets for alloimmune responses.     

Significance of HLA-matching and anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplant patients receiving induction therapy?

ObjectivesThough Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching benefits are demonstrated in renal transplantation, evidence in heart transplantation is lacking, and its clinical feasibility is uncertain. Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies are being increasingly studied in organ transplantation, with diverging conclusions between transplantated organs.MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively the influence of HLA matching and anti-HLA antibodies on overall survival, acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy in 309 patients receiving induction therapy and triple-drug immunosuppression.ResultsThe average number of HLA-A/B/DR mismatches between donor and recipient was 4.9 ± 1. The majority of mismatches was for Class I HLA-A/B with an average of 3.3, then for Class I HLA-DR with an average of 1.6. Overall, the HLA-A/-B/-DR mismatches had no influence on the cardiac allograft survival (p = 0.28). However, HLA-DR mismatches were negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection (p = 0.04). Our analysis found anti-HLA antibodies in 27% of recipients, de novo anti-HLA antibodies in 16% of recipients, and donor-specific anti-HLA (DSA) antibodies in 8% of recipients. Furthermore, de novo DSA had no influence on the 5-year survival (78% with DSA vs. 92% without DSA; p = 0.49), which may be masked by the limited number of recipients in analysis By univariable analysis, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on severe cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy.ConclusionsHLA-DR mismatch was negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection but had no influence on cardiac allograft survival. In this study, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy. The results of this study add to the controversy on the impact of allo-antibodies in heart transplant recipients receiving induction therapy and contemporary immunosuppression.     

Anti–Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Antibodies Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Patients Without Preformed HLA-Donor–Specific Antibody

IntroductionAngiotensin II is a peptide hormone involved in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Anti–angiotensin receptor 1 (AT1R) antibodies are implicated in stimulating RAS and are suspected to have some adverse impacts on renal transplantation outcome.MethodsFrom November 2009 to February 2012, 37 remaining sera from renal transplantation recipients with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (n = 6), acute cellular rejection (ACR) (n = 23), and AMR + ACR (n = 8) without preformed human leukocyte antigeon (HLA) antibodies were tested with anti-AT1R antibody assay. Forty-two control patients without rejection also were analyzed.ResultsThe frequency of elevated anti-AT1R antibodies was higher in patients with AMR (n = 14) compared to controls (28.6% vs 4.9%, P = .03, OR = 8.0). It was also higher in patients with AMR + ACR (n=8) (37.5% vs 4.9%, P = .03, OR = 12.0). There was no difference in frequencies of elevated anti-AT1R antibody in patients with ACR.ConclusionAnti-AT1R antibodies were suspected to be associated with occurrence of AMR without preformed HLA antibodies in renal transplantation. Further studies in a larger number of patients are needed.     

Impact of glutathione S-transferase T1 gene polymorphisms on acute cellular rejection in living donor liver transplantation

It has previously been demonstrated that glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) genetic mismatch between recipient and donor is a risk factor for developing immune-mediated hepatitis following liver transplantation and for antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation. Little is known whether the GSTT1 gene polymorphism affects the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Patients underwent LDLT at Nagoya University or Kyoto University, Japan, between 2004 and 2009. Genotyping of GSTT1 genes (null or present genotype) was conducted in recipients and donors. A total of 155 LDLT cases were examined. Forty-seven recipients (30.3%) developed early ACR. There was no association of recipient GSTT1 genotype with ACR incidence. However, ACR incidence was significantly higher in recipients transplanted from GSTT1 present genotype donors than in those transplanted from GSTT1 null genotype donors [odds ratio (OR) = 2.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12–5.83, p = 0.016]. Moreover, GSTT1 recipient/donor genotype mismatch (present/null or null/present) was significantly associated with ACR development (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.12–4.61, p = 0.022). The genotyping of GSTT1 in recipients and donors might be useful to stratify the liver transplant recipients according to risk of ACR.     

Free Airway C4d after Lung Transplantation - A Quantitative Analysis of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

In recent years, the utility of vascular complement factor 4d (C4d) deposition as diagnostic tool for antibody mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation, has become a controversial issue. We aimed to pinpoint the problematic nature of C4d as biomarker with a simple experiment.We quantified C4d in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) of lung transplant patients with diverse post-transplant complications in 3 different settings of clinically clear cases of: 1/ chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD); 2/ acute complications acute rejection (AR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis (LB), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and respiratory infection (INF); 3/ patients with parallel C4d immunostaining and Anti-HLA. All groups were compared to BAL of stable patients. C4d was measured via standard ELISA.C4d was increased in CLAD, predominantly in RAS (p = 0.0026) but not in BOS (p = 0.89). C4d was increased in all acute events, AR (p = 0.0025), LB (p < 0.0001), AMR (p = 0.0034), infections (p < 0.0001). In patients with parallel C4d immunostaining and serum HLA antibodies, C4d was increased in C4d-/HLA- (p = 0.0011); C4d-/HLA+ (p = 0.013); HLA+/C4d + (p = 0.0081). A correlation of systemic C-reactive protein (CRP) with C4d was found in all patients (r = 0.49; p < 0.0001). We hypothesize that free C4d in BAL may only be representative of a general immune response in the transplanted lung.     

Association of positive pre-transplant angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies with clinical outcomes in lung transplant recipients

IntroductionAutoantibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab) have been previously associated with de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation in lung transplantation. However, data regarding the clinical significance of AT1R-Ab in long-term graft function after lung transplantation are lacking.MethodsSeventy-one patients who underwent lung transplantation between July 2016 and January 2020 were enrolled in this study. We examined the relationship between pre-transplant AT1R-Ab levels and graft function, clinical outcomes, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DSA levels during the first 3 years post-transplantation.ResultsSeventeen (23.9%) patients were AT1R-Ab-positive, and 54 (76.1%) were AT1R-Ab-negative. The median antibody value of the AT1R-Ab-positive group was 18 [18–22.5] U/mL, while that of the AT1R-Ab-negative group was 5.1 [3.5–8.0] U/mL (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the median acute cellular rejection (ACR) scores between the two groups (median [interquartile range] 1 [0.8–3] vs. 0.7 [0–1]; p = 0.145). However, there was a significant difference in the distribution of the ACR scores between the two groups (p = 0.015). Most (41.2%) patients in the pre-transplant AT1R-positive group scored above 1. The incidence of de novo DSA was also higher in AT1R-Ab-positive than in AT1R-Ab-negative patients (52.9% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.009). The incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) within 3 years was significantly higher in AT1R-Ab-positive than in AT1R-Ab-negative patients (58.3% vs. 11.8%; p < 0.001). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, AT1R-Ab positivity (hazard ratio, 9.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.89–30.94; p < 0.001) was significantly associated with early CLAD. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that AT1R-Ab-positive patients had a shorter survival time (χ² = 39.62, p < 0.001).ConclusionHigh AT1R-Ab levels in the pre-transplant serum of lung recipients were associated with the development of de novo HLA-DSA, ACR, early CLAD, and short survival.     

Intestinal Transplantation at a Single Institution in Japan

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of intestinal transplantation (ITX) between 2 groups by using medications for induction treatment and assess the utility of the current protocol.MethodsFrom 2003 to 2020, 11 patients underwent ITX. Recipients were classified into 2 groups: group IL-2Ra (interleukin-2 receptor antagonist therapy, n = 6) and ATG (rabbit antithymocyte globulin therapy, n = 5). We conducted a retrospective review of patient and graft survival rates and the postoperative course.ResultsThe 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient and graft survival rates of the 11 primary grafts in the 11 recipients were 100%, 88.9%, 62.2% and 90.0%, 78.8%, 56.3%, respectively. The median duration of follow-up for the IL-2Ra and ATG groups was 197.3 and 87.3 months, respectively. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 100%, 83.3%, 50% and 100%, 100%, 100% for the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .25) and 83.3%, 66.7%, 33.3% and 100%, 100%, 100% for graft survival in the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .08). The incidence of moderate and severe acute rejection was 100% and 20% in the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .02). The 1- and 5-year moderate and severe rejection-free survival rates were 33.3%, 0% and 80%, 80% in the IL-2Ra and ATG groups, respectively (P = .04).ConclusionsATG significantly suppressed moderate and severe acute rejection compared with IL-2Ra, thereby showing better short- and mid-term rejection-free survival rates. Additional clinical experience is needed to determine the optimal regimen for the management of ITX recipients.     

Anti-perlecan antibodies and acute humoral rejection in hypersensitized patients without forbidden HLA specificities after kidney transplantation

BackgroundThe improvement in the definition of serum anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-Abs) profiles after Luminex-assay implementation in transplant patients follow-up is clear. This success has permitted the development of hypersensitized-recipient allocation and donor-paired exchange programs improving the access to transplantation. However, non-HLA Abs have been described in transplanted patients but their effect in hypersensitized transplanted recipients is unclear.MethodsTwenty-seven HLA hypersensitized patients awaiting for kidney transplantation (KT) were studied and 11 of them were followed after KT. The HLA Abs profile was confirmed in serum by Single Antigen Luminex assay and panel reactive of antigens >98% was achieved in all patients. Subsequently, the ability to fix complement by C1q test was also assessed. Serum non-HLA Abs before and 1 month after transplantation were measured in the 11 hypersensitized recipients.Results95.2% of the hypersensitized on waiting list had concomitant serum anti-HLA and non-HLA Abs. The more frequent specificity in non-HLA Abs were found against Glutathione S-transferase theta-1 (GSST-1) (in 62%) and C-terminal fragment of perlecan (LG3) (in 52%). Four out of 11 transplanted patients presented early antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) confirmed by biopsy and had serum anti-LG3 antibodies, two of them with concomitant anti-anti-angiotensin II type I receptor. Only one patient developed de novo-donor specific HLA antibodies.ConclusionsThe incidence of non-HLA antibodies in patients in the waiting list is largely underestimated. The concomitance anti-HLA and non-HLA Abs in hypersensitized patients is very common and the detection of non-HLA Abs in this population could allow to identify patients with an increased risk of humoral rejection.     

Risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of recipients

ObjectiveTo determine the risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients.MethodsClinicopathological data of 290 patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 2012 to December 2021 at our center were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were grouped into an acute rejection (AR) group and a normal (NM) group based on the confirmed histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the risk factors for acute rejection.Results244 patients were included in the study. Acute rejection occurred in 27 (11.1%) of the patients. Warm ischemia time (P = 0.137), cold ischemia time (P = 0.064) and chronic liver failure (P = 0.001) were potential risk factors for acute rejection. Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47–27.32) was the independent risk factor. There was no significant difference in overall survival between recipients with acute rejection and those without it (P = 0.985). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival in the NM group was 98.1%, 85.7% and 78.6% respectively vs 88.9%, 82.5% and 82.5% respectively in the AR group.ConclusionAcute rejection does not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients. Only chronic liver failure was an independent risk factor for acute rejection. Our findings further illustrate that contradictions still exist on which factors influence acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.SummaryClinicopathological data of 290 liver transplant recipients at our center between January 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated to determine the risk factors for acute rejection and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients. 244 patients were included in the analysis. 27 of the 244 experienced acute rejection. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce the confounding effect. Patients were assigned to an acute rejection group (n = 27) and a normal group (n = 54). Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47–27.32) was the determined to be independent risk factor for acute rejection. Acute rejection did not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients and there was no significant difference in overall survival between the patients with acute rejection and those without it.     

Immune reconstitution syndrome-like entity in lung transplant recipients with invasive aspergillosis

BackgroundIncidence, characteristics, and risk-factors for invasive aspergillosis (IA)-associated immune reconstitution syndrome (IRS) in lung transplant recipients are not known.MethodsPatients comprised 68 lung transplant recipients with proven/probable IA followed for 12 months. IRS was defined based on previously proposed criteria.ResultsIn all, 7.3% (5/68) of the patients developed IRS based on aforementioned criteria, a median of 56 days after initiation of antifungal therapy. This entity was associated with heart–lung transplantation (p = 0.006), anti T-cell agent use (p = 0.003), discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitor agent (p = 0.002), and disseminated IA (p = 0.069). In a risk assessment model, IRS developed in 0% (0/55) of the patients with none of the aforementioned factors, 28.6% (2/7) with one, 33.3% (1/3) with two, and in 1/1 patient with 3 factors (X² for trend p = 0.0001). Three out of 5 patients with IRS died and 2 of 3 deaths in this group were due to chronic rejection.ConclusionsOverall 7% of the lung transplant recipients with IA appear to develop an IRS-like entity. Clinically assessable factors can identify patients at risk for post-transplant IA-associated IRS. Deaths due to chronic rejection were significantly higher in patients with IRS than those without IRS.     

Preemptive immune globulin therapy in sensitized lung transplant recipients

BackgroundSensitized lung transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing donor-specific antibodies, which have been associated with acute and chronic rejection. Perioperative intravenous immune globulin has been used in sensitized individuals to down-regulate antibody production.MethodsWe compared patients with a pre-transplant calculated panel reactive antibody ≥25% who did not receive preemptive immune globulin therapy to a historical control that received preemptive immune globulin therapy. Our cohort included 59 patients, 17 patients did not receive immune globulin therapy and 42 patients received therapy.ResultsDonor specific antibody development was numerically higher in the non-immune globulin group compared to the immune globulin group (58.8% vs 33.3%, respectively, odds ratio 2.80, 95% confidence interval [0.77, 10.79], p = 0.13). Median time to antibody development was 9 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 19) and 28 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 58) in the non-immune globulin and immune globulin groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of primary graft dysfunction at 72 h post-transplant or acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 12 months.ConclusionThese findings are hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for larger, randomized studies to determine association of immune globulin therapy with clinical outcomes.     

Mannose-binding lectin-2 and ficolin-2 gene polymorphisms and clinical risk factors for acute rejection in kidney transplantation

IntroductionThere is growing evidence that the lectin pathway is significantly associated with acute rejection. Rare studies associated both gene polymorphisms of MBL2 and FCN2 with acute rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the lectin gene profile and clinical risk factors such as PRA level on acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.MethodsWe prospectively analyzed 157 kidney transplant recipients with and without acute rejection. A total of 6 well-known functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the MBL2 gene and 5 in the FCN2 gene of the recipients were determined by gene sequencing. MBL2 and FCN2 genotypic variants were analyzed for association with the incidence of acute rejection within the first year after kidney transplantation.ResultsAfter adjusting for variables of P < 0.2, we found the differences in the incidence of acute rejection were only according to panel-reactive antibodies (odds ratios (OR) = 6.468, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 2.017–20.740, P = 0.002) and the HH genotypes of MBL2 promoter ? 550 (OR = 2.448, 95%CI = 1.026–5.839, P = 0.044).ConclusionPanel-reactive antibodies and the HH genotypes of MBL2 promoter ? 550 have significant impacts on the risk of developing acute rejection after kidney transplantation.     

The impact of non-HLA antibodies directed against endothelin-1 type A receptors (ETAR) on early renal transplant outcomes

BackgroundNon-HLA antibodies (Abs) targeting vascular receptors are considered to have an influence on renal transplant injury. Anti-endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) antibodies were associated with cellular and antibody-mediated rejection and early onset of vasculopathy in heart transplant patients but their role in renal transplantation remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and importance of anti-ETAR antibodies and their impact on renal transplant during the first year observation.MethodsWe evaluated the presence of anti-ETAR antibodies in 116 consecutive renal transplant recipients in pre- and post-transplant screening (before and in 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th month after transplantation). Additionally, we assessed the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. Anti-ETAR antibodies were assayed by ELISA. The diagnosis of acute rejection was based on the Banff criteria.ResultsAnti-ETAR antibodies were observed in 55 (47.4%) of the analyzed recipients before transplantation. The function of renal transplant was significantly worse in the anti-ETAR(+) group compared to the anti-ETAR(?) group during the first post-transplant year. One month after transplantation the serum creatinine in anti-ETAR (+) patients (pts) was 1.86 ± 0.8 mg/dl and 1.51 ± 0.5 in anti-ETAR(?) pts (p = 0.009). Twelve months after transplantation the difference between the groups was still observed 1.70 ± 0.7 vs. 1.40 ± 0.4 (p = 0.04).Biopsy proven acute rejection was recognized in 8/55 (14.5%) in ETAR(+) and 9/61 (14.8%) in ETAR(?) patients but cases with mild to severe intimal arteritis (v1–v3) were more often observed in patients with the presence of anti-ETAR Abs 4/55 (7.2%) comparing with 1/61 (1.6%) in anti-ETAR(?) patients. The anti-ETAR antibody levels varied at different measurement intervals during the one-year follow-up.ConclusionsThe presence of anti-ETAR antibodies is associated with a worse renal transplant function during the first 12 months after transplantation. Including anti-ETAR antibodies in the diagnostics of renal transplant recipient immune status should be considered to provide comprehensive assessment of humoral alloimmunity.     

Pre- and post-transplant monitoring of granzyme B enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay in pediatric liver recipients

This study aims to investigate potential role of granzyme B enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (GrB ELISPOT) for immunological monitoring in pediatric liver transplantation.Patients and methodsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells from 28 pediatric recipients were serially tested for GrB-producing donor-reactive cells at day 0 pre-transplantation (baseline) and days 7, 14, and 28 post-transplantation.ResultsAt baseline, no difference of GrB value was found in acute rejection (14/28) compared to normal graft function patients (day 0: 4(3.9) spots versus 5(2.9) spots, respectively: p = 0.65). At day 7 post-transplantation, acute rejection patients showed frequencies of GrB ELISPOT higher than those with normal graft function, but the differences observed were not statistically significant (day 7: 15(4.9) spots versus 10(4.0) spots, respectively: p = 0.55). GrB increased significantly at day 7 from baseline in the rejection group (15(4.9) spots versus 4(3.9), respectively p = 0.04), whereas corresponding changes were not significant in the group without rejection (10(4.0) versus 5(2.9), respectively: p = 0.15). Conclusion: GrB ELISPOT pre-transplantation could not predict the occurrence of early post-transplant acute rejection; similarly frequencies at days 7, 14 and 28 could not be correlated with acute rejection in pediatric liver recipients. However, a kinetic study of GrB ELISPOT could be helpful to predict or confirm early rejection in the small group of liver allograft recipients analyzed in this study.     

Glucocorticoid resistance in dialysis patients reduces long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation

Glucocorticoid (GC) resistance has been observed in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on dialysis. It can be evaluated by binding assays based on the dissociation constant (Kd), which is inversely proportional to ligand affinity. CKD patients with GC resistance had increased number of acute rejection episodes. We followed up 26 patients that underwent kidney transplantation to observe whether GC resistance could affect the response to acute rejection episode pulse therapy and the long-term allograft outcome. Using Kaplan–Meier survival curve, GC resistant patients showed lower acute rejection-free survival (p = 0.03) and lower kidney allograft survival (p = 0.008). No difference was found regarding number of deaths. Multivariate logistic regression showed that high Kd value was an independent predictor of lower kidney allograft survival (p = 0.001). There was a negative Spearman correlation between Kd and kidney allograft survival (r = ? 0.88, p = 0.03). In conclusion, our findings indicate the usefulness of binding assay performed previously to kidney transplantation to define GC resistance. In addition, the dissociation constant (Kd) is a reliable and independent predictive marker of higher frequency of acute rejection episodes, lower rejection-free graft survival, poor response of acute rejection episodes to methylprednisolone pulse therapy, and lower kidney allograft survival in a long-term follow-up.     

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Therapy Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Acute Rejection Episodes or Allograft Vasculopathy in Heart Transplant Recipients

BackgroundWe evaluated the potential effects of granulocyte colony-simulating factor (G- CSF) on the incidence of rejection and allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients.MethodsOf 247 patients undergoing heart transplantation from 2000 to 2007, 52 (21%) developed leukopenia (white blood cell [WBC] <2.5 × 10⁹cells/L) in the absence of active infection, rejection, or malignancy. In 24 (46%) patients a clinical decision was made to treat the leukopenia with G-CSF (G-CSF group), and 28 (54%) Patients received no G-CSF (non-GCSF group). Patients followed up for 1 year after the period of leukopenia were assessed for allograft vasculopathy and acute rejection incidence.ResultsAt baseline, the G-CSF group and the non-GCSF group did not differ in age, gender, race, heart failure etiology, creatinine, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or immunosupressive regimen. During 1-year follow-up there were no deaths in the G-CSF group, and 1 death in the non-GCSF group (P = .34). The incidence of rejection or progressive allograft vasculopathy was lower in the G-CSF group when compared with the non-GCSF group (2 [8%] vs 15 [53%]; P < .01). Multivariate analysis identified both prior rejection episodes and G-CSF therapy as factors associated with the combined end-point of rejection or progressive allograft vasculopathy (odds ratio [OR] = 7.89 [1.67–37.2] and OR = 0.09 [0.02–0.52], respectively).ConclusionsG-CSF therapy appears to be associated with a decreased incidence of acute rejection episodes or allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients, suggesting a potential immunomodulatory effect of G-CSF.     

The impact of induction therapy in low-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients regardless of HLA matching

BackgroundInduction agents have proved to reduce the rate of acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) without improving long-term graft and patient survival (PS).ObjectiveThis study evaluates the utility of induction therapy in low immunological risk KTRs regardless of donor-to-recipient HLA matching.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 218 patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT). These patients were divided into two groups according to the usage of induction therapy: 82 did not receive any induction therapy (Group I), and 136 patients received either Anti-IL2 receptor antibodies or anti-thymocyte globulin (Group II). All patients had panel reactive antibody (PRA) < 20% and absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The difference in outcomes were assessed at different intervals following KT.ResultsThe rate of bacterial infections at one year (p-value = 0.032) and the frequency of CMV disease (p-value = 0.044) were significantly higher in Group II (with induction therapy). The duration of hospital stay, the rate and severity of acute rejection, the occurrence of delayed graft function, the rate and type of surgical complications at one year, and the graft function and survival at one and three years were similar between the two groups (p-value = NS). In addition, the financial burden is much less in Group I (without induction therapy), reducing the total cost of the transplant procedure.ConclusionWe conclude that induction therapy in low-immunological risk kidney transplant patients is not a must regardless of donor-to-recipient HLA matching. Therefore, induction therapy did not yield significant health results, but had negative financial consequences.     

Impact of Tacrolimus Trough Variability on Acute Rejection Following Lung Transplantation

BackgroundAcute rejection is a risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors are the cornerstone of immunosuppression regimens after lung transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the association of tacrolimus level variability with total acute rejection score at 12 months post-transplant. Secondary outcomes included the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and antibody-mediated rejection at 24months post-transplant. There were 229 lung transplant recipients included.ResultsThe mean (standard deviation) total rejection score of the cohort was 1.6 (1.7). Patients with high tacrolimus variability at 0 to 3, 3 to 6, and 6 to 12 months on average scored 0.18 (mean 1.6 vs 1.5; 95% CI): -0.3 to 0.66, P =.46), 0.14 (mean 1.7 vs 1.5; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.6, P = .55), and 0.12 (mean 1.6 vs 1.5; 95% CI: -0.34 to 0.58, P = .62) point higher in 12-month total acute rejection scores, respectively; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The incidences of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and antibody-mediated rejection were numerically greater in the high variability group throughout certain periods; however, this was not consistent throughout all study timeframes and statistical significance was not evaluated.ConclusionsHigh tacrolimus variability was not associated with increased 12-month total acute rejection score. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes with tacrolimus level variability.     

Donor and Recipient Hepatitis C Status Does Not Affect Rejection in Thoracic Transplantation

BackgroundDonors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have expanded the donor pool for heart and lung transplantation, but concerns have arisen about rejection. We examined the incidence of rejection after heart and lung transplantation in recipients of HCV-positive donors as well as HCV-positive recipients.MethodsAdults undergoing heart and lung transplantation from March 31, 2015 to December 31, 2019 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Transplantation and Procurement Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file. Patients were stratified as donor–recipient HCV negative, donor positive, and recipient positive. Comparative statistics and a multilevel logistic regression model were used.ResultsMeeting the criteria were 10 624 heart transplant recipients. Donor-positive recipients were significantly associated with older age, blood group O, and shorter waitlist time. No significant differences existed with regards to treatment for rejection in the first year (negative, 19.5%; donor positive, 22.3%; recipient positive, 19.5%; P = .45) or other outcomes. On regression analysis HCV status was not associated with treated rejection; however center variability was significantly associated with treated rejection (median odds ratio, 2.18). Similarly, 9917 lung transplant recipients were identified. Donor-positive recipients were more commonly White and had obstructive disease and lower lung allocation scores. Both unadjusted (negative, 22.1%; donor positive, 23.0%; recipient positive, 18.6%; P = .43) and adjusted analyses failed to demonstrate a significant association between HCV status and treatment for rejection, whereas center variability remained significantly associated with treatment for rejection (median odds ratio, 2.41).ConclusionsUse of HCV donors has expanded the donor pool for heart and lung transplantation. HCV donor status was not associated with treatment for rejection in the first year, but center variability played a role in the incidence and treatment of rejection.     

Detection of plasma cells,C4d deposits and donor-specific antibodies on sequential graft biopsies of renal transplant recipients with chronic dysfunction

BackgroundIn order to look for a relationship between humoral mechanisms of rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction, plasma cells, C4d deposits and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were simultaneously sought on serial biopsies of kidney allograft recipients.Patients and methodsTen recipients with chronic dysfunction (G1) and 8 recipients with long-term normal graft function (G2) were included. Biopsies and serums were sampled at early graft dysfunction (T1), between 8 months and 2 years (T2) and after the third year following transplantation (T3).ResultsIn G1, plasma cells represented 12.3% (T1), 8.2% (T2) and 14.1% (T3) of mononuclear cells. The mean percentage of plasma cells was 11.6% in G1 versus 0.4% in G2 (p < 0.05). A progressive rise in C4d deposits was seen in G1, from 25% at T1 to 80% at T3. Donor-specific antibodies were identified in at least one serum sample of 60% of the patients in G1 and 12.5% of the patients in G2 (p = 0.012), whereas donor-specific antibodies were eluted from at least one biopsy of 50% of the patients in G1 and 12.5% of the patients in G2 (p = 0.03). In G1, C4d deposits were significantly associated with plasma cells (p = 0.0012) and anti-HLA Abs in serum samples and/or eluates (p = 0.026).ConclusionThis study shows that plasma cells, DSA and C4d are associated in renal transplants developing chronic rejection.