Risk Factors for De Novo Malignancy Following Lung Transplantation

Risk factors for non–skin cancer de novo malignancy (DNM) after lung transplantation have yet to be identified. We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing database for all adult lung transplant patients between 1989 and 2012. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were computed by comparing the data to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data after excluding skin squamous/basal cell carcinomas. We identified 18 093 adult lung transplant patients; median follow‐up time was 1086 days (interquartile range 436–2070). DNMs occurred in 1306 patients, with incidences of 1.4%, 4.6%, and 7.9% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The overall cancer incidence was elevated compared with that of the general US population (SIR 3.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.95–3.60). The most common cancer types were lung cancer (26.2% of all malignancies, SIR 6.49, 95% CI: 5.04–8.45) and lymphoproliferative disease (20.0%, SIR 14.14, 95% CI: 9.45–22.04). Predictors of DNM following lung transplantation were age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02–1.05, p < 0.001), male gender (HR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02–1.42, p = 0.03), disease etiology (not cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or interstitial lung disease, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.97, p = 0.04) and single‐lung transplantation (HR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.34–2.01, p < 0.001). Significant interactions between donor or recipient smoking and single‐lung transplantation were noted. On multivariable survival analysis, DNMs were associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10–1.88, p = 0.009).     

Incidence and Predictors of Cancer Following Kidney Transplantation in Childhood

Cancer risk is increased substantially in adult kidney transplant recipients, but the long‐term risk of cancer in childhood recipients is unclear. Using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, the authors compared overall and site‐specific incidences of cancer after transplantation in childhood recipients with population‐based data by using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Among 1734 childhood recipients (median age 14 years, 57% male, 85% white), 289 (16.7%) developed cancer (196 nonmelanoma skin cancers, 143 nonskin cancers) over a median follow‐up of 13.4 years. The 25‐year cumulative incidences of any cancer were 27% (95% confidence intervals 24–30%), 20% (17–23%) for nonmelanoma skin cancer, and 14% (12–17%) for nonskin cancer (including melanoma). The SIR for nonskin cancer was 8.23 (95% CI 6.92–9.73), with the highest risk for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (SIR 45.80, 95% CI 32.71–62.44) and cervical cancer (29.4, 95% CI 17.5–46.5). Increasing age at transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per year 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.14), white race (aHR 3.36, 95% CI 1.61–6.79), and having a functioning transplant (aHR 2.27, 95% CI 1.47–3.71) were risk factors for cancer. Cancer risk, particularly for virus‐related cancers, is increased substantially after kidney transplantation during childhood.     

Local Expansion of Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Activity Improves Waitlisted Outcomes and Addresses Inequities of Access to Transplantation

In the United Kingdom, donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplant activity has increased rapidly, but marked regional variation persists. We report how increased DCD kidney transplant activity influenced waitlisted outcomes for a single center. Between 2002–2003 and 2011–2012, 430 (54%) DCD and 361 (46%) donation after brain death (DBD) kidney‐only transplants were performed at the Cambridge Transplant Centre, with a higher proportion of DCD donors fulfilling expanded criteria status (41% DCD vs. 32% DBD; p = 0.01). Compared with U.K. outcomes, for which the proportion of DCD:DBD kidney transplants performed is lower (25%; p < 0.0001), listed patients at our center waited less time for transplantation (645 vs. 1045 days; p < 0.0001), and our center had higher transplantation rates and lower numbers of waiting list deaths. This was most apparent for older patients (aged >65 years; waiting time 730 vs. 1357 days nationally; p < 0.001), who received predominantly DCD kidneys from older donors (mean donor age 64 years), whereas younger recipients received equal proportions of living donor, DBD and DCD kidney transplants. Death‐censored kidney graft survival was nevertheless comparable for younger and older recipients, although transplantation conferred a survival benefit from listing for only younger recipients. Local expansion in DCD kidney transplant activity improves survival outcomes for younger patients and addresses inequity of access to transplantation for older recipients.     

Risk of Thyroid Cancer Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients have an elevated incidence of thyroid cancer. We evaluated a wide range of potential risk factors in a cohort of 229 300 U.S. solid organ transplant recipients linked with 15 stage/regional cancer registries (1987–2012). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, transplanted organ, year of transplantation, and time since transplantation. Hazard ratios (HRs) for death and/or graft failure were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, transplanted organ, and year of transplantation. After transplantation, 356 thyroid cancers were diagnosed. Thyroid cancer incidence was 2.50‐fold higher in transplant recipients than the general population (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25–2.77). Among recipients of different organs, kidney recipients had the highest incidence of thyroid cancer (IRR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.03–1.53). Elevated thyroid cancer incidence was associated with cholestatic liver disease/cirrhosis as an indication for liver transplantation (IRR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.09–2.63), hypertensive nephrosclerosis as an indication for kidney transplantation (IRR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.03–1.94), and longer prior dialysis among kidney recipients (5+ vs. <1 year, IRR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.32–2.80; p‐trend <0.01). Posttransplantation diagnosis of thyroid cancer was associated with modestly increased risk of death (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.02–1.73). Overall, our results suggest that end‐stage organ disease and longer duration of dialysis may contribute to higher thyroid cancer incidence in transplant recipients.     

Cyclosporine A Protects Against Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) reoccurs in a proportion of patients following liver transplantation (LT). The aims of our study were to evaluate the risk factors associated with PBC recurrence and determine whether recurrent disease constitutes a negative predictor for survival. One hundred and eight patients receiving LT for end‐stage PBC were studied. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 28 patients (26%). Probability of recurrent PBC at 5 years was 13% and 29% at 10 years with an overall incidence of 3.97 cases per 100 patient years. By univariate Cox analysis use of tacrolimus (HR 6.28, 95% CI, 2.44–16.11, p < 0.001) and mycophenolate mofetil (HR 5.21, 95% CI, 1.89–14.33, p = 0.001) were associated with higher risk of recurrence; whereas use of cyclosporine A (CsA) and azathioprine were associated with reduced risk of recurrence (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05–0.35, p < 0.001 and HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.64, p = 0.003, respectively). In the multivariate Cox analysis, only CsA was independently associated with protection against recurrence (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.71, p = 0.02). Five‐year probability of survival was 83% and 96%, in patients without and with recurrence (log‐rank test, p = 0.3). Although PBC transplant recipients receiving CsA have a lower risk of disease recurrence, the development of recurrent PBC did not impact on long‐term patient survival.     

Selection criteria related to long‐term survival following liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis

Patients with nonresectable colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy have a 5‐year overall survival rate of about 10%. Liver transplant provided a Kaplan‐Meier–estimated 5‐year overall survival of up to 83%. The objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of different scoring systems to predict long‐term overall survival after liver transplant. Patients with colorectal cancer with nonresectable liver‐only metastases determined by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging/positron emission tomography (PET)‐CT scans from 2 prospective studies (SECA‐I and ‐II) were included. All included patients had previously received chemotherapy. PET‐CT was performed within 90 days of the liver transplant. Overall survival, disease‐free survival, and survival after relapse based on the Fong Clinical Risk Score, total PET liver uptake (metabolic tumor volume), and Oslo Score were compared. At median follow‐up of 85 months for live patients, Kaplan‐Meier overall survival rates at 5 years were 100%, 78%, and 67% in patients with Fong Clinical Risk Score 0 to 2, metabolic tumor volume–low group, and Oslo Score 0 to 2, respectively. Median overall survival was 101, 68, and 65 months in patients with Fong Clinical Risk Score 0 to 2, metabolic tumor volume–low, and Oslo Score 0 to 2. These selection criteria may be used to obtain 5‐year overall survival rates comparable to other indications for liver transplant.     

Wait List Death and Survival Benefit of Kidney Transplantation Among Nonrenal Transplant Recipients

The disparity between the number of patients waiting for kidney transplantation and the limited supply of kidney allografts has renewed interest in the benefit from kidney transplantation experienced by different groups. This study evaluated kidney transplant survival benefit in prior nonrenal transplant recipients (kidney after liver, KALi; lung, KALu; heart, KAH) compared to primary isolated (KA1) or repeat isolated kidney (KA2) transplant. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit using UNOS data for patients wait listed and transplanted from 1995 to 2008. Compared to KA1, the risk of death on the wait list was lower for KA2 (p < 0.001;HR = 0.84;CI = 0.81–0.88), but substantially higher for KALu (p < 0.001; HR = 3.80;CI = 3.08–4.69), KAH (p < 0.001; HR = 1.92; CI = 1.66–2.22), and KALi (p < 0.001; HR = 2.69; CI = 2.46–2.95). Following kidney transplant, patient survival was greatest for KA1, similar among KA2, KALi, KAH, and inferior for KALu. Compared to the entire wait list, renal transplantation was associated with a survival benefit among all groups except KALu (p = 0.017; HR = 1.61; CI = 1.09–2.38), where posttransplant survival was inferior to the wait list population. Recipients of KA1 kidney transplantation have the greatest posttransplant survival and compared to the overall kidney wait list, the greatest survival benefit.     

Survival Benefit From Kidney Transplantation Using Kidneys From Deceased Donors Aged ≥75 Years: A Time‐Dependent Analysis

Patients with end‐stage renal disease have longer survival after kidney transplantation than they would by remaining on dialysis; however, outcome with kidneys from donors aged ≥75 years and the survival of recipients of these organs compared with their dialysis counterparts with the same probability of obtaining an organ is unknown. In a longitudinal mortality study, 2040 patients on dialysis were placed on a waiting list, and 389 of them received a first transplant from a deceased donor aged ≥75 years. The adjusted risk of death and survival were calculated by non–proportional hazards analysis with being transplanted as a time‐dependent effect. Projected years of life since placement on the waiting list was almost twofold higher for transplanted patients. Nonproportional adjusted risk of death after transplantation was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.32; p < 0.001) in comparison with those that remained on dialysis. Stratifying by age, adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.17 (95% CI 0.47–0.06; p = 0.001) for those aged <65 years, 0.56 (95% CI 0.92–0.34; p = 0.022) for those aged 65–69 years and 0.82 (95% CI 1.28–0.52; p = 0.389) for those aged ≥70 years. Although kidney transplantation from elderly deceased donors is associated with reduced graft survival, transplanted patients have lower mortality than those remaining on dialysis.     

Increased Mortality and Graft Loss With Kidney Retransplantation Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)–Infected Recipients

Excellent outcomes have been demonstrated in primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive (HIV+) kidney transplant recipients, but a subset will lose their graft and seek retransplantation (re‐KT). To date, no study has examined outcomes among HIV+ re‐KT recipients. We studied risk for death and graft loss among 4149 (22 HIV+ vs. 4127 HIV‐negative [HIV?]) adult re‐KT recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) (2004–2013). Compared to HIV? re‐KT recipients, HIV+ re‐KT recipients were more commonly African American (63.6% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001), infected with hepatitis C (31.8% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001) and had longer median time on dialysis (4.8 years vs. 2.1 years, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in length of time between the primary and re‐KT events by HIV status (1.5 years vs. 1.4 years, p = 0.52). HIV+ re‐KT recipients experienced a 3.11‐fold increased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 3.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82–5.34, p < 0.001) and a 1.96‐fold increased risk of graft loss (aHR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14–3.36, p = 0.01) compared to HIV? re‐KT recipients. Re‐KT among HIV+ recipients was associated with increased risk for mortality and graft loss. Future research is needed to determine if a survival benefit is achieved with re‐KT in this vulnerable population.     

Risk of lip cancer after solid organ transplantation in the United States

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of lip cancer, but the reasons are uncertain. Using data from the Transplant Cancer Match Study, we describe the epidemiology of lip cancer among 261 500 transplant recipients in the United States. Two hundred thirty‐one lip cancers were identified, corresponding to elevated risks for both invasive and in situ lip cancers (standardized incidence ratios of 15.3 and 26.2, respectively). Invasive lip cancer incidence was associated with male sex (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 2.01, 95% CI 1.44‐2.82), transplanted organ (0.33, 0.20‐0.57, for liver transplants and 3.07, 1.96‐4.81, for lung transplants, compared with kidney transplants), and racial/ethnic groups other than non‐Hispanic whites (0.09, 0.04‐0.2). In addition, incidence increased with age and during the first 3 years following transplant, and was higher in recipients prescribed cyclosporine/azathioprine maintenance therapy (aIRR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09‐2.93, compared with use of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil) and following a diagnosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (4.21, 2.69‐0.94). The elevation in lip cancer incidence is consistent with an effect of immunosuppression. Notably, the very strong associations with white race and history of prior skin cancer point to an important role for ultraviolet radiation exposure, and cyclosporine and azathioprine may contribute as photosensitizing or DNA damaging agents.     

Variation in Biliary Complication Rates Following Liver Transplantation: Implications for Cost and Outcome

Although biliary complications (BCs) have a significant impact on the outcome of liver transplantation (LT), variation in BC rates among transplant centers has not been previously analyzed. BC rate, LT outcome and spending were assessed using linked Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims (n = 16 286 LTs). Transplant centers were assigned to BC quartiles based upon risk‐adjusted observed to expected (O:E) ratio of BC separately for donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. The median incidence of BC was 300% greater in the highest versus lowest DBD quartiles (19.0% vs. 5.9%) and varied 250% between DCD quartiles (20.3%–8.4%). Donor and recipient characteristics suggest that high BC centers actually used lower donor risk index organs, fewer split livers and fewer imports (p < 0.001 for all). Transplant at a center in the highest O:E quartile was associated with increased posttransplant mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.53, p = 0.007) in DCD transplant and increased graft loss (aHR 1.21, p = 0.02) in DBD transplant. Medicare spending was $22 895 (p < 0.0001) higher at centers in highest versus lowest BC quartile. In summary, BC rates vary widely among transplant centers and higher rates are a marker for an increased risk of death, graft failure and health‐care spending.     

Decreasing incidence of cancer after liver transplantation—A Nordic population‐based study over 3 decades

Cancer remains one of the most serious long‐term complications after liver transplantation (LT). Data for all adult LT patients between 1982 and 2013 were extracted from the Nordic Liver Transplant Registry. Through linkage with respective national cancer‐registry data, we calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) based on country, sex, calendar time, and age‐specific incidence rates. Altogether 461 cancers were observed in 424 individuals of the 4246 LT patients during a mean 6.6‐year follow‐up. The overall SIR was 2.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02‐2.43). SIRs were especially increased for colorectal cancer in recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (4.04) and for lung cancer in recipients with alcoholic liver disease (4.96). A decrease in the SIR for cancers occurring within 10 years post‐LT was observed from the 1980s: 4.53 (95%CI, 2.47‐7.60), the 1990s: 3.17 (95%CI, 2.70‐3.71), to the 2000s: 1.76 (95%CI, 1.51‐2.05). This was observed across age‐ and indication‐groups. The sequential decrease for the SIR of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma was 25.0‐12.9‐7.53, and for nonmelanoma skin cancer 80.0‐29.7‐10.4. Cancer risk after LT was found to be decreasing over time, especially for those cancers that are strongly associated with immunosuppression. Whether immunosuppression minimization contributed to this decrease merits further study.     

Serum phosphate and calcium concentrations are associated with reduced patient survival following kidney transplantation

Moore J, Tomson CRV, Tessa Savage M, Borrows R, Ferro CJ. Serum phosphate and calcium concentrations are associated with reduced patient survival following kidney transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 406–416. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The impact of disordered mineral and bone metabolism following kidney transplantation is not well defined. We studied the association of serum phosphate and calcium concentrations, and surrogate measures of arterial stiffness (augmentation index: AIx and Timing of the reflected wave: Tr), with long‐term kidney transplant recipient and allograft survival. Prevalent adult renal transplant patients (n = 270) were prospectively studied over a median 88‐month follow‐up. Detailed demographic, clinical and laboratory data, in addition to both peripheral and central non‐invasive blood pressure measurements, were recorded. Higher serum phosphate and calcium levels were associated with increased all‐cause mortality (HR: 1.21; 95% CI 1.09,1.35, p < 0.001 and HR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.01,1.48; p < 0.04, respectively; adjusted Cox model) and death‐uncensored graft loss (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). In addition, serum calcium and phosphate were associated with death‐censored graft loss on univariable analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively), but did not retain significance on multivariable analysis. AIx and Tr were not associated with mortality or graft loss on multivariable analysis. This is the first report to demonstrate that both higher serum phosphate and calcium levels are associated with increased mortality in kidney transplant recipients. It highlights the need for randomized trials assessing current interventions available for improving disordered mineral–bone metabolism post transplantation.     

Liver alone or simultaneous liver–kidney transplant? Pretransplant chronic kidney disease and post‐transplant outcome – a retrospective study

The new Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Organ Sharing Network (OPTN/UNOS) simultaneous liver–kidney transplant (SLK) policy has been implemented. The aim of this study was to review liver transplant outcomes utilizing the new SLK policy. Liver transplant alone (LTA) and SLK patients between 2009 and 2015 were reviewed. Graft survival and post‐transplant kidney function were investigated among LTA patients meeting the chronic kidney disease (CKD) criteria of the new policy (LTA‐CKD group). To validate our findings, we reviewed and applied our analysis to the OPTN/UNOS registry. A total of 535 patients were eligible from our series. The LTA‐CKD group (n = 27) showed worse 1‐year graft survival, compared with the SLK group (n = 44), but not significant (81% vs. 93%, P = 0.15). The LTA‐CKD group significantly increased a risk of post‐transplant dialysis (odds ratio = 5.59 [95% CI = 1.27–24.7], P = 0.02 [Ref. normal kidney function]). Post‐transplant dialysis was an independent risk factor for graft loss (hazard ratio = 7.25, 95% CI = 3.3–15.91, P < 0.001 [Ref. SLK]). In the validation analysis based on the OPTN/UNOS registry, the hazard of 1‐year‐graft loss in the LTA‐CKD group (n = 751) was 34.8% higher than the SLK group (n = 2856) (hazard ratio = 1.348, 95% CI = 1.157–1.572, P < 0.001). Indicating SLK for patients who meet the CKD criteria may significantly improve transplant outcomes.     

Donors With Immune Thrombocytopenia: Do They Pose a Risk to Transplant Recipients?

Transplant‐mediated alloimmune thrombocytopenia (TMAT) from donors with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) can result in significant bleeding complications in the recipient. The risk to a recipient of TMAT if they receive an organ from a donor with ITP is unknown. The outcomes of recipients of organs from deceased donors with ITP recorded in the UK Transplant Registry between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed. Twenty‐one deceased organ donors had a predonation diagnosis of ITP. These donors were significantly more likely to have died from intracranial hemorrhage than were all other deceased organ donors (85% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Organs from donors with ITP resulted in 49 organ transplants (31 kidney, 14 liver, four heart), with only one case of TMAT, which occurred in a liver transplant recipient and resulted in death from bleeding complications 18 days posttransplantation. The recipient of a kidney from the same organ donor was not affected. Unadjusted 5‐year patient and graft survival was significantly worse for liver transplant recipients from donors with ITP compared with liver transplant recipients from donors without ITP (64% vs. 85%, p = 0.012). Organs from donors with ITP may be considered for transplantation, but livers should be used with caution.     

Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End‐Stage Liver Disease Patients

While regional organ availability dominates discussions of distribution policy, community‐level disparities remain poorly understood. We studied micro‐geographic determinants of survival risk and their distribution across Donor Service Areas (DSAs). Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records for all adults waitlisted for liver transplantation 2002–2014 were reviewed. The primary exposure variables were county‐level sociodemographic risk, as measured by the Community Health Score (CHS), a previously‐validated composite index local health conditions, and distance to listing transplant center. Among 114 347 patients, the median CHS was 19.4 (range: 0–40). Compared the lowest risk counties (CHS 1–10), highest‐risk counties (CHS 31–40) had more black (14.6% vs. 5.4%), publicly insured (44.9% vs. 33.0), and remote candidates (34.0% vs. 15.1% living >100 miles away). Higher‐CHS candidates had greater waitlist mortality in Cox multivariable (HR 1.16 for CHS 31–40, 95% CI 1.11–1.21) and competing risks analysis (sHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.14). Post‐transplant survival was similar across CHS quartiles. Living >25 miles from the transplant center conferred excess mortality risk (sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.12). Proposed distribution changes would disproportionately impact DSAs with more high‐CHS or distant candidates. Low‐income, rural and minority patients experience excess mortality while awaiting transplant, and risk disproportionately worse outcomes with reduced organ availability under current proposals.     

Identification of Optimal Donor–Recipient Combinations Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)–Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients

For some patient subgroups, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been associated with worse outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT); potentially modifiable factors may be responsible. The study goal was to identify factors that predict a higher risk of graft loss among HIV‐positive KT recipients compared with a similar transplant among HIV‐negative recipients. In this study, 82 762 deceased donor KT recipients (HIV positive: 526; HIV negative: 82 236) reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) (2001–2013) were studied by interaction term analysis. Compared to HIV‐negative recipients, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) amplified risk 2.72‐fold among HIV‐positive KT recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75–4.22, p < 0.001). Forty‐three percent of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and HCV (attributable proportion of risk due to the interaction [AP]: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23–0.63, p = 0.02). Among HIV‐positive recipients with more than three HLA mismatches (MMs), risk was amplified 1.80‐fold compared to HIV‐negative (aHR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.31–2.47, p < 0.001); 42% of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and more than three HLA MMs (AP: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24–0.60, p = 0.01). High‐HIV‐risk (HIV‐positive/HCV‐positive HLAwith more than three MMs) recipients had a 3.86‐fold increased risk compared to low‐HIV‐risk (HIV‐positive/HCV‐negative HLA with three or fewer MMs)) recipients (aHR: 3.86, 95% CI: 2.37–6.30, p < 0.001). Avoidance of more than three HLA MMs in HIV‐positive KT recipients, particularly among coinfected patients, may mitigate the increased risk of graft loss associated with HIV infection.     

Transplantation of Kidneys From Donors With Acute Kidney Injury: Friend or Foe?

The gap between supply and demand in kidney transplantation has led to increased use of marginal kidneys; however, kidneys with acute kidney injury are often declined/discarded. To determine whether this policy is justified, we analyzed outcomes of donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) in a large UK cohort. A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry evaluated deceased donors between 2003 and 2013. Donors were classified as no AKI, or AKI stage 1–3 according to Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. Relationship of AKI with delayed graft function/primary nonfunction (DGF/PNF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and graft‐survival at 90 days and 1 year was analyzed. There were 11 219 kidneys (1869 [17%] with AKI) included. Graft failure at 1 year is greater for donors with AKI than for those without (graft survival 89% vs. 91%, p = 0.02; odds ratio (OR) 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–1.41]). DGF rates increase with donor AKI stage (p < 0.005), and PNF rates are significantly higher for AKIN stage 3 kidneys (9% vs. 4%, p = 0.04) Analysis of association between AKI and recipient eGFR suggests a risk of inferior eGFR with AKI versus no AKI (p < 0.005; OR 1.25 [95% CI: 1.08–1.31]). We report a small reduction in 1‐year graft‐survival of kidneys from donors with AKI. We conclude that AKI stage 1 or 2 kidneys should be used; however, caution is advised for AKI stage 3 donors.     

Outcomes following Kidney transplantation in IgA nephropathy: a UNOS/OPTN analysis

This study updates assessment of post‐transplant outcomes in IgAN patients in the modern era of immunosuppression. Using UNOS/OPTN data, patients ≥18 yr of age with first kidney transplant (1/1/1999 to 12/31/2008) were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression models and propensity score‐based matching techniques were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for death‐censored allograft survival (DCGS) and patient survival in IgAN compared to non‐IgAN. Results of multivariable regression were stratified by donor type (living vs. deceased). A total of 107, 747 recipients were included (4589 with IgAN and 103 158 with non‐IgAN). Adjusted HR for DCGS showed no significant difference between IgAN and non‐IgAN. IgAN had higher patient survival compared to non‐IgAN (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47–0.62, p < 0.0001 for deceased donors; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33–0.54, p < 0.0001 for living donors). Propensity score‐matched analysis was similar, with no significant difference in DCGS between matched groups and higher patient survival in IgAN patients compared to non‐IgAN group (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47, 0.63; p‐value <0.0001). IgAN patients with first kidney transplant have superior patient survival and similar graft survival compared to non‐IgAN recipients. Results can be used in prognostication and informed decision‐making about kidney transplantation in patients with IgAN.