Animal-derived lipocalin allergens exhibit immunoglobulin E cross-reactivity

Background Although knowledge of the IgE cross‐reactivity between allergens is important for understanding the mechanisms of allergy, the regulation of the allergic immune response and the development of efficient modes of allergen immunotherapy, the cross‐reactivity of animal allergens is poorly known. Objective The aim of this study was to characterize IgE cross‐reactivities between lipocalin proteins, including five animal‐derived lipocalin allergens and one human endogenous lipocalin, tear lipocalin (TL). Methods The recombinant proteins were validated by chromatography and mass spectrometry. The IgE‐binding capacity of the allergens was confirmed by IgE. immunoblotting and IgE immunoblot inhibition. IgE ELISA was performed with sera from 42 atopic patients and 21 control subjects. The IgE cross‐reactivities between the lipocalin proteins were determined by ELISA inhibition. Results ELISA inhibition revealed IgE cross‐reactivities between Can f 1 and human TL, between Can f 1 and Can f 2, and between Equ c 1 and Mus m 1. Low levels of IgE to human TL were found in the sera of seven dog‐allergic patients of whom six were IgE‐positive for Can f 1. Conclusion Several lipocalins exhibited IgE cross‐reactivity, probably due to the sequential identity of the proteins and also due to similarities in their three‐dimensional structures. The clinical significance of the findings needs to be elucidated. Low‐level IgE cross‐reactivity can play a role in regulating immune response to lipocalin allergens.     

Fel d 4, a cat lipocalin allergen

BACKGROUND: Cat allergy is unique among allergy to mammals in that the major allergen Fel d 1 is a uteroglobin-like protein and not a lipocalin. The biochemical spectrum of the cat allergens is thus uncertain, particularly with regard to the role that a cat lipocalin protein may play in sensitization to cats in allergic individuals. OBJECTIVE: To analyse cDNA encoding a lipocalin allergen and the corresponding recombinant allergen at both the molecular and immunological levels. METHODS: A submandibular salivary gland cDNA expression library was constructed and screened for clones producing IgE-binding polypeptides. cDNA encoding a lipocalin allergen and its corresponding recombinant allergen were analysed. RESULTS: An IgE binding molecule with high sequence identity to the boar salivary lipocalin and the horse lipocalin Equ c 1 allergen was isolated and designated, Fel d 4. Serum from 62.96% of cat-allergic subjects examined had measurable IgE antibody to Fel d 4 but typically at low levels. Despite this in 47% of sera the anti-Fel d 4 IgE titres were higher than the anti-Fel d 1 titres. IgE binding to the lipocalin allergen could be blocked by an allergen extract from cow and to a lesser degree by extracts from horse and dog. CONCLUSION: Fel d 4 is a lipocalin allergen produced by the cat, which binds IgE at relatively high frequency in cat-sensitive individuals. The allergen provides not only a means for investigating differences in the immune response to lipocalin allergens from that found for other mammalian species but also an important reagent for the diagnosis of cat allergy.     

Detection of an allergen in dog dander that cross-reacts with the major cat allergen, Fel d 1

BACKGROUND: A considerable proportion of animal-allergic patients are sensitized to both cat and dog allergens but knowledge about cross-reactive allergens in cat and dog dander is limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether dog dander contains an allergen that cross-reacts with the major cat allergen, Fel d 1. METHODS: Recombinant Fel d 1 with the same immunological properties as natural Fel d 1 was used for quantitative (CAP) IgE competition experiments performed with sera obtained from cat-allergic patients (n=36). A Fel d 1 cross-reactive dog allergen was characterized by one- and two-dimensional immunoblotting using rFel d 1 for IgE inhibition experiments and with monospecific, polyclonal rabbit anti-recombinant Fel d 1 antibodies. RESULTS: In 25% of Fel d 1-reactive cat-allergic patients, more than 50% inhibition of IgE reactivity to dog allergens was achieved with recombinant Fel d 1. An Fel d 1 cross-reactive 20 kDa allergen with a pI of approximately 3.4 was detected in dander extracts of several different dog breeds. CONCLUSION: This is the first report demonstrating the presence of an Fel d 1-like allergen in dog dander extracts, which may be responsible for double positivity to cat and dog in serology. However, the clinical relevance of this cross-sensitization needs to be confirmed. These results are important for the diagnostic and therapeutic use of dog dander allergen extracts.     

The major dog allergens, Can f 1 and Can f 2, are salivary lipocalin proteins: cloning and immunological characterization of the recombinant forms.

Canis familiaris allergen 1 (Can f 1) and Canis familiaris allergen 2 (Can f 2) are the two major allergens present in dog dander extracts. We now report the isolation of cDNAs encoding both proteins and present their nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences. Can f 1, produced by tongue epithelial tissue, has homology with the von Ebner's gland (VEG) protein, a salivary protein not previously thought to have allergenic properties. Can f 2, produced by tongue and parotid gland, has homology with mouse urinary protein (MUP), a known allergen. Both VEG protein and MUP are members of the lipocalin family of small ligand-binding proteins. Recombinant forms of Can f 1 and Can f 2 were produced and tested for immunoglobulin E (IgE) reactivity. Among dog-allergic subjects, 45% had IgE directed exclusively to rCan f 1, and 25% had IgE to both rCan f 1 and rCan f 2. In addition, both recombinant proteins were able to cross-link IgE and elicit histamine release from peripheral blood leucocytes in vitro. These findings confirm that Can f 1 and Can f 2 are major and minor dog allergens, respectively, and demonstrate that recombinant forms of dog allergens retain at least some IgE-binding epitopes.     

Molecular cloning, expression and modelling of cat allergen, cystatin (Fel d 3), a cysteine protease inhibitor

BACKGROUND: Cats are an important source of indoor allergens. However, only two cat allergens, Fel d 1 and albumin, have been cloned and sequenced. IgE antibodies to Fel d 1 and albumin do not fully account for IgE responses to cat and there is good immunochemical evidence that cats produce other allergens. OBJECTIVE: To identify and define the molecular structure of the other potential cat allergens. METHODS: A cat skin cDNA library was screened using pooled serum obtained from five asthmatic patients which contained high levels of IgE antibody to cat dander. Selected cDNA clones were screened by plaque immunoassay and one cDNA clone, encoding cystatin, was expressed in E. coli. The three dimensional structure of cat cystatin was modelled using the SWISS-MODEL computer program. RESULTS: Three positive cDNA clones (A, B and C) were identified, two of which were fully sequenced. Clones A and C encoded the same 98 amino acid residue sequence which showed 79% and 75% homology with bovine and human cystatin A, respectively. The cat cystatin sequence contained the conserved cysteine protease inhibitor signature and two of three lipocalin motifs. By plaque immunoassay, 60-90% of cat allergic sera had IgE ab to the expressed cystatin clones. The cysteine protease inhibitor motif was also partially conserved in dog allergen sequences, Can f 1 and Can f 2, which are lipocalins. The recombinant protein was expressed in E. coli as an 11-kDa protein, corresponding to the predicted MW of cat cystatin. The three-dimensional structure of cat cystatin was modelled on human cystatin structures. CONCLUSION: A newly identified allergen, cystatin (Fel d 3), has been cloned from cat skin and is a member of the cysteine protease inhibitor family.     

Characterization of dog allergens Can f 1 and Can f 2. 2. A comparison of Can f 1 with Can f 2 regarding their biochemical and immunological properties

BACKGROUND: The major dog allergens, Can f 1 and Can f 2, are members of the lipocalin protein family. The characterization of both dog allergens is still not complete. Their deduced amino acid sequences indicate the presence of three cysteine residues, probably connected with a disulfide bridge. We compared the biochemical and immunological properties of Can f 1 with those of Can f 2 using gel filtration, electrophoresis, and immunological assays. METHODS: The rCan f 1, rCan f 2 and dog salivary proteins containing natural Can f 1 and Can f 2 were analyzed by HPLC gel filtration. The recombinant Can f 1 (rCan f 1) and rCan f 2 were analyzed by native and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) with or without reduction. The binding ability of rabbit IgG purified by protein G affinity chromatography from the antiserum against rCan f 1 and rCan f 2 was examined after a reduction in the recombinant allergens. The immunological cross-reaction between rCan f 1 and rCan f 2 was examined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the rabbit IgG against rCan f 1 and rCan f 2. The cross-reaction of human IgE in the serum of a patient with dog allergy between rCan f 1 and rCan f 2 was also analyzed by competitive ELISA. RESULTS: The molecular weights of rCan f 1 and of rCan f 2 were 18 and 21 kDa, respectively, using SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, but the natural Can f 1 and Can f 2 were separated by HPLC gel filtration into fractions containing proteins of 31 and 34 kDa, respectively. rCan f 1 and rCan f 2 migrated as multiple bands (30-100 kDa) in native PAGE in the presence or absence of a reductant. The molecular weights of natural Can f 1 and of Can f 2 were 20 and 23 kDa, respectively, in SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The ability of rabbit IgG to bind to rCan f 1 and rCan f 2 increased after the reduction of the recombinant allergens. The rabbit IgG against rCan f 1 bound to rCan f 2. Cross-reaction of human IgE was observed between rCan f 1 and rCan f 2. CONCLUSIONS: In the native and recombinant forms, Can f 1 and Can f 2 possessed a dimer structure under natural (non-reduced) condition. The dimers of Can f 1 and of Can f 2 were not built with a disulfide bridge but by non-covalent association. Cleavage of a disulfide bond of rCan f 1 and rCan f 2 increased the ability of binding of rabbit IgG to the allergens. The cross-reactivity of rabbit IgG and human IgE between rCan f 1 and rCan f 2 indicates that the same epitope(s) was present in Can f 1 and Can f 2.     

Molecular and immunological characterization of Can f 4: a dog dander allergen cross‐reactive with a 23 kDa odorant‐binding protein in cow dander

Background Dog dander is an important cause of respiratory allergy but its content of allergenic components is still incompletely known. While Can f 1, 2, 3 and 5 have been studied in detail, only fragmentary information is available on the lipocalin Can f 4. Objective To purify, clone and characterize dog dander allergen Can f 4. Methods Can f 4 was purified from dog dander extract by size exclusion, ion exchange and reverse phase chromatography. A cDNA encoding Can f 4 was cloned and used to produce recombinant Can f 4 in Escherichia coli. A 23 kDa protein from cow dander, displaying cross‐reactivity with Can f 4, was purified and identified by amino acid sequencing and mass spectrometry. IgE antibody binding to dog and cow dander extract and to individual dog allergens among 37 dog allergic subjects and 44 pollen allergic controls was studied using ImmunoCAP. Results A dog genome segment containing the Can f 4 gene was bioinformatically identified and enabled the cloning of Can f 4 cDNA. Recombinant Can f 4 displayed close immunological and biochemical similarity to purified natural Can f 4 and bound IgE antibodies from 13/37 (35%) sera of dog allergic subjects. Can f 4 reactive sera showed IgE binding to a 23 kDa protein present in cow dander extract, related to a family of odorant‐binding proteins. The dog and cow proteins shared 37% sequence identity and their cross‐reactivity was demonstrated by IgE inhibition experiments. Conclusion Recombinant Can f 4 brings the panel of available dog allergens closer to completion and will be important in component‐resolved diagnostics in allergy to animal epithelial allergens. Cite this as: L. Mattsson, T. Lundgren, P. Olsson, M. Sundberg and J. Lidholm, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 1276–1287.     

Exposure to an abundance of cat (Fel d 1) and dog (Can f 1) allergens in Swedish farming households

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have shown that farmers are to a low degree sensitized to animal allergens. We have measured the amount of cat (Fel d 1) and dog (Can f 1) in farm households and examined the relationship between exposure and sensitization to cat and dog allergens. METHODS: Dust samples from the homes of 403 farmers who had participated in an epidemiologic follow-up study on respiratory symptoms were analyzed for allergen content by two-site ELISA methods. RESULTS: Fel d 1 was detected in 99.5% of the farmers' households ranging from 0.055 to 1455 microg/g dust in mattresses (GM 13.2) and to 3775 microg/g dust in living-room carpets (GM 17.1). Can f 1 was detected in 90.6% of the households from 0.2 to 116 microg/g dust in mattresses (GM 2.0) and to 504 microg/g dust in carpets (GM 4.3). Homes with pets present had the highest levels of the allergens (P<0.001). A total of 8.4% and 7.4% of the farmers were sensitized to cat and dog, respectively. A significant correlation was noted between exposure to the allergens and specific IgE to cat and dog, respectively (P<0.001). Sensitization to cat (OR = 4.9) and dog (OR = 17.8) was significantly associated with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the abundance of Fel d 1 and Can f 1, farmers are only to a low degree sensitized to cats and dogs.     

High-level expression of immunoreactive recombinant cat allergen (Fel d 1): Targeting to antigen-presenting cells

BACKGROUND: Cat allergen Fel d 1 is a heterodimer encoded by 2 separate genes that has been difficult to produce as a fully immunoreactive molecule. OBJECTIVE: We sought to engineer recombinant (r) Fel d 1 with IgE and IgG antibody binding comparable with that of the natural allergen that could be targeted to antigen-presenting cells. METHODS: The rFel d 1 chains were coexpressed in baculovirus, either linked to the anti-CD64 antibody H22 (rFel d 1 H22(+)) or alone (rFel d 1 H22 (-)). Binding of expressed allergens to mouse and human antibodies was compared with that of natural (n) Fel d 1 by means of enzyme immunoassay and antigen-binding and inhibition RIAs. Binding of rFel d 1 H22 (+) to the CD64 receptor on leukocyte subpopulations and on the THP -1 cell line was analyzed by means of flow cytometry. RESULTS: The baculovirus-expressed allergens migrated with molecular weights of 49 kd (rFel d 1 H22(+)) and 22 kd (rFel d 1 H22 (-)). The rFel d 1 inhibited IgG antibody binding to nFel d 1 by greater than 95% and showed identical dose-dependent inhibition curves. There was an excellent quantitative correlation between IgE and IgG antibody binding to rFel d 1 and nFel d 1 in sera from patients with cat allergy (IgE: n = 258, r = > 0.72,P <.001). The rFel d 1 H22(+) bound to monocytes but not to lymphocytes or neutrophils, and binding of rFel d 1 H22(+) to THP-1 cells was inhibited by a soluble CD64 fusion protein. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant Fel d 1 chains have been successfully coexpressed as mature proteins with comparable immunoreactivities to nFel d 1. The rFel d 1 can be targeted to antigen-presenting cells through CD64. These constructs will facilitate structural studies of Fel d 1 and the development of improved allergy diagnostics and therapeutics.     

Higher immunoglobulin E antibody levels to recombinant Fel d 1 in cat-allergic children with asthma compared with rhinoconjunctivitis

Background Current diagnosis of allergy and asthma to cat is confirmed using cat dander extract (CDE). We have previously engineered a recombinant major cat allergen, rFel d 1, with properties identical to the natural molecule.
Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate IgE and IgG4 antibodies to rFel d 1 among sera from cat-allergic children and adults suffering from asthma and/or rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) in populations from Sweden and Austria.
Methods Cat-allergic children and adults from Sweden ( n =27 and 31, respectively) and Austria ( n =41 and 41) with RC and/or asthma were selected. Sera were tested for IgE and IgG4 antibodies to CDE and rFel d 1 by CAP, and IgE to rFel d 1 by ELISA. Healthy subjects and non-cat-allergic patients ( n =75) were included as controls.
Results There was a high correlation between IgE responses to rFel d 1 and CDE among the 140 patients ( r _s=0.85, P <0.001); however, measured levels to rFel d 1 were on average 30% higher ( P <0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of patients and none of the controls showed IgE to rFel d 1 and there was a threefold increased risk of asthma for half of the children with the highest IgE levels [odds ratio 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19–8.79] by ELISA. IgE responses to rFel d 1 among children with asthma were higher (median 19.4 kU/L) compared with children with RC (median 6.6 kU/L, P <0.05) and adults with asthma (median 3.0 kU/L, P <0.01). Furthermore, children with asthma displayed higher IgG4 levels than the asthmatic adults.
Conclusion A single recombinant molecule, rFel d 1, is at least as sensitive for in vitro diagnostics of cat allergy as the current extract-based test. Elevated IgE antibody levels to Fel d 1 are suggested to be a risk factor for asthma in cat-allergic children.     

The effect of dry heat on mite, cat, and dog allergens

Background Various techniques have been tried in an attempt to reduce allergen levels in homes. This study investigated the effect of dry heat on mite, cat, and dog allergens.
Methods Samples (50 mg) of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae cultures, and of house dust rich in the major cat and dog allergens Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were heated for 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min at 60°, 80°, 100M20°, and 140°C. Control samples remained at room temperature. Extracts were assayed with the appropriate two-site mono- or mono/polyclonal sandwich ELISA, Results For Der p 1, the breakdown was proportional to temperature and heating time; after 30 min at 120°C, allergen levels were reduced to < 1 % of control. Der p 2 was more heat stable, requiring 140°C for 30-60 min to achieve >99% reduction. D. farinae groups 1 and 2 allergens showed results similar to those obtained with D. pteronyssinus. In contrast. Can f 1 and Fel d 1 were considerably more thermostable, with 50% and 70%, respectively, of allergen remaining after 60 min at 140°C.
Conciusions The effect of dry heat on allergens increased with increasing time and temperature, cat and dog allergens demonstrating greater heat resistance than mite allergens. Dry heating methods may represent an alternative technique for removal of mite allergens: however, the greater stability of Fel d 1 and Can f 1 suggests that this procedure may not be appropriate for pet allergens.     

High prevalence of sensitization to cat allergen among Japanese children with asthma, living without cats

BACKGROUND: Cat allergy is common among children with asthma. Many cat-allergic patients in Japan and elsewhere do not keep cats, but nonetheless become sensitized through environmental exposure to cat allergen. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of cat allergy and cat-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody responses in young Japanese patients with asthma in relation to self-reported cat exposure and Fel d 1 levels in dust samples. METHODS: Cat dander-specific IgE antibody was measured in sera from asthma patients using the CAP system. IgE and IgG antibody to Fel d 1 was measured by antigen binding radioimmunoassay and by chimeric enzyme immunoassay. Fel d 1 levels in dust samples from a subset of patients' homes were measured by monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Cat-specific IgE (CAP class>/=2) was found in sera from 70% of 44 patients who kept cats and 34% of 394 patients who had never kept cats. The prevalence of sensitization increased progressively to age 6 years (40%: positive), and then increased gradually to age 16 years (approximately 60%: positive) in patients who had never kept cats. There was an excellent correlation between cat CAP values and IgE levels to Fel d 1. The absolute amount of IgE antibody to Fel d 1 ranged from 0.01 to 15.6% of total IgE. Most patients who did not keep cats were exposed to Fel d 1 levels ranging from 0.07-8 microg/g dust. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization to cat allergen is common among young asthmatic patients in Japan, even among patients who do not keep cats. Use of CAP and the chimeric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay allows accurate diagnosis of cat allergy and quantification of specific IgE antibody levels.     

Dog allergen (Can f 1) and cat allergen (Fel d 1) in US homes: results from the National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing

BACKGROUND: Exposures to dog and cat allergens are believed to play important roles in the etiology of asthma; however, the levels of these allergens have never been assessed in a representative sample of US homes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate and characterize exposures to Can f 1 (dog allergen) and Fel d 1 (cat allergen) in US homes. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing, a nationally representative survey of 831 US homes. Vacuumed-collected dust samples from the bed, bedroom floor, living room floor, and living room sofa were analyzed for concentrations of Can f 1 and Fel d 1 (micrograms of allergen per gram of dust). RESULTS: Although a dog or cat had lived in only 49.1% of homes in the previous 6 months, Can f 1 and Fel d 1 were detected in 100% and 99.9% of homes, respectively. Averaged over the sampled sites, geometric mean concentrations (microg/g) were 4.69 for Can f 1 and 4.73 for Fel d 1. Among homes with an indoor dog and cat, respectively, geometric mean concentrations were 69 for Can f 1 and 200 for Fel d 1. Among homes without the indoor pet, geometric mean concentrations were above 1.0. The independent predictors of elevated concentrations in homes without pets were all demographic variables that were also linked to a higher prevalence of pet ownership. CONCLUSIONS: Can f 1 and Fel d 1 are universally present in US homes. Levels that have been associated with an increased risk of allergic sensitization were found even in homes without pets. Because of the transportability of these allergens on clothing, elevated levels in homes without pets, particularly among demographic groups in which pet ownership is more prevalent, implicate the community as an important source of these pet allergens.     

Identification of a novel cat allergen--cystatin

BACKGROUND: Cat allergen is an important cause of sensitization among children with asthma in Japan. Although there is good evidence that cats produce other allergens, only one major allergen, Fel d 1, has been studied in detail. AIMS: To identify and define the molecular structure of the other potential cat allergens. METHODS: A cat skin cDNA library was screened using IgE antibodies to cat dander and selected clones were sequenced and expressed. RESULTS: One cDNA clone contained an open reading frame encoding a 98-amino acid residue protein. Sequence homology searches revealed a high degree of identity with bovine and human cystatin A, 79 and 75%, respectively. This cat cystatin clone contained the conserved cysteine protease motif and two of three lipocalin motifs. By plaque immunoassay, 60-90% of cat allergic sera had IgE Ab to cat cystatin. This cysteine protease inhibitor motif was partially conserved in dog allergens, Can f 1 and Can f 2, which are lipocalins. Recombinant cystatin was produced in Escherichia coli cells and purified as an 11-kD protein, corresponding to the predicted MW of cystatin. The structure of cat cystatin was modeled on human cystatin B using the SWISS-MODEL. CONCLUSION: A newly identified allergen, cystatin, has been cloned from cat skin and is a member of the cysteine protease inhibitor family.     

Carbohydrate-based particles reduce allergic inflammation in a mouse model for cat allergy

Background:  Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is the only treatment of allergic disease that gives long-lasting relief of symptoms. However, concerns for safety and efficiency have highlighted the need for improvement of the therapy. We have previously suggested carbohydrate-based particles (CBPs) as a novel adjuvant and allergen carrier for ASIT. Our aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic potential of CBPs in ASIT, employing a mouse model for cat allergy.
Methods:  BALB/c mice were subcutaneously immunized with the recombinant (r) cat allergen Fel d 1 followed by intranasal challenge with cat dander extract (CDE). The sensitized mice were therapeutically treated with rFel d 1 covalently coupled to CBPs (CBP-rFel d 1). Airway hyper-reactivity (AHR), infiltration of leucocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin levels and in vitro splenocyte responses were evaluated.
Results:  Mice treated with CBP-rFel d 1 showed reduced features of allergic inflammation. They responded with (i) significantly decreased AHR and infiltration of eosinophils in BAL fluid after CDE challenge, (ii) the serum level of rFel d 1-specific IgE was reduced and the level of IgG₂a was more pronounced after CBP-rFel d 1 treatment, and (iii) there was also a tendency of decreased allergen-specific cellular response.
Conclusions:  Carbohydrate-based particles are effective tools as adjuvant and allergen carriers for use in ASIT and constitutes a promising strategy to improve allergy treatment.     

Quantitative measurement of airborne allergens from dust mites, dogs, and cats using an ion-charging device

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that children raised with an animal(s) in the house have a decreased risk of becoming sensitized. However, it is not clear whether this phenomenon is related to airborne exposure. OBJECTIVE: To estimate airborne exposure to animal dander and dust mite allergens using a device that can sample large volumes of air silently. METHODS: The device, which uses an ion-charging technique to move air and to collect particles, was run at 1.7 m3/min for 24 h in 44 homes with and without animals. The allergen collected was measured by ELISA for Fel d 1, Can f 1, Der p 1, and Der f 1. RESULTS : Airborne Fel d 1 was present in all homes with a cat (n=27). The quantities measured, i.e. 0.5-20 microg in 24 h, represent 0.01-0.3 microg Fel d 1 inhaled/day at normal breathing rates (20 L/h). Values for houses without a cat were 0.01-0.05 microg inhaled/day. Airborne Fel d 1 correlated significantly with floor Fel d 1 (r=0.58, P<0.001). Results for Can f 1 were similar in houses with a dog, but this allergen was only detected airborne in two houses without a dog. Neither Der p 1 nor Der f 1 (i.e. <0.01 microg) was detected, which represents < or =1 ng inhaled/day during normal domestic activity. During disturbance airborne mite was detected with both the ion-charging device and a filter run in parallel. For cat and mite allergens there was a close correlation between the two techniques (r=0.84, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Exposure to cat or dog allergen airborne in homes with an animal can be up to 100 times higher than exposure to mite allergen. The results are in keeping with a model where immunological tolerance to animal dander allergens results from high exposure.     

Assessment of recombinant dog allergens Can f 1 and Can f 2 for the diagnosis of dog allergy

BACKGROUND: The use of recombinant allergens for the diagnosis and immunotherapy of allergy may offer several advantages over allergen extracts. OBJECTIVE: To produce recombinant dog allergens Can f 1 and Can f 2 in Pichia pastoris yeast and to assess their suitability for the diagnosis of dog allergy. METHODS: Clinically diagnosed dog-allergic patients' and healthy non-atopic dog owners' reactivities against recombinant Can f 1 and Can f 2 and commercial dog epithelial extract were studied by a panel of methods including skin prick test (SPT), ELISA and IgE immunoblotting. RESULTS: Recombinant Can f 1 and Can f 2 were found immunologically functional: they bound dog-allergic patients' IgE in immunoblotting and inhibited specifically the binding of IgE to their natural counterparts in the dog allergen extract. Moreover, patients' IgE reactivity in immunoblotting to natural Can f 1 and their SPT with the recombinant allergen were perfectly concordant (phi coefficient 1.0, P<0.001). The concordance was slightly lower with recombinant Can f 2 (phi coefficient 0.92, P<0.001). A lower number of dog-allergic patients, 52%, reacted against Can f 1 than previously reported. About one-third of the patients reacted to Can f 2. In immunoblotting, the highest prevalence of reactivity, 60%, was directed to an 18 kDa component. Aminoterminal sequencing showed this to be a previously unidentified allergenic protein. CONCLUSIONS: The recombinant allergens can be used reliably to identify Can f 1 and Can f 2-sensitized individuals. However, the two allergens are insufficient as reagents for diagnosing dog allergy.     

Fel d 1 and Can f 1 in settled dust and airborne Fel d 1 in allergen avoidance day-care centres for atopic children in relation to number of pet-owners, ventilation and general cleaning

BACKGROUND: Special day-care centres for atopic children have been established in Sweden. OBJECTIVE: To study concentrations of cat (Fel d 1) and dog (Can f 1) allergens in settled dust and airborne cat allergen in day-care centres in relation to pet ownership among children and staff, ventilation and general cleaning. METHODS: Twelve allergen avoidance day-care centres and 22 conventional day-care centres were included in the study. Settled dust was collected and analysed with ELISA. Airborne cat allergen levels were measured in eight allergen avoidance and seven conventional centres with a personal air sampler and analysed with an amplified ELISA. Air change rate per hour (ACH) was measured. A questionnaire which focused on keeping of cat and dog among staff and children and frequency of general cleaning was used. RESULTS: In the allergen avoidance day-care centres neither children nor staff reported ownership of cats or dogs, compared with 21/22 of the conventional centres in which children and staff kept furred animals. Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were found in settled dust in all day-care centres. In the allergen avoidance compared with the conventional centres the concentrations of Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were lower, Fel d 1: median 0. 64 microg/g vs 5.45 microg/g and Can f 1: 0.39 microg/g vs 2.51, both P < 0.001, and airborne Fel d 1 was also lower in the allergen avoidance centres compared with the control centres, 1.51 ng/m3 vs 15.8 ng/m3, P = 0.002. A correlation was found between airborne and settled Fel d 1, rs = 0.75, P < 0.001. Furthermore, a correlation was found between increased ACH and decreased levels of Fel d 1 in the air in the day-care centres with no cat-owners, rs = - 0.86, P = 0.007. No relation was found between levels of cat or dog allergen and amount of general cleaning. CONCLUSION: Not keeping pets seems to reduce children's exposure to pet-allergen in their 'working environment'. Additionally, appropriate ventilation seems to reduce Fel d 1 in the air in day-care centres.     

Purified natural and recombinant Fel d 1 and cat albumin in in vitro diagnostics for cat allergy

BACKGROUND: Current diagnostics and therapeutics for cat allergy are based on cat epithelial extracts originating from highly variable source materials. This gives rise to several problems: variability of allergen composition, contamination with house dust mite allergens, and potential transfer of pathogenic agents. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of replacing cat epithelial extracts with purified natural or recombinant allergens. METHODS: Sera (n = 509) were selected on the basis of a positive cat RAST result and tested in a RAST for IgE reactivity to purified Fel d 1, cat albumin (CA), or both. The analysis was performed with both natural and recombinant allergens. In addition, some sera were further analyzed by means of immunoblotting. A serum pool was used for cat RAST inhibition with purified natural and recombinant allergens as inhibitors. RESULTS: Natural and recombinant Fel d 1 caused very similar results: 94.1% and 96.1% positive test results, respectively. In general, the negative sera were low responders to cat extract. The addition of CA (16.7% positive sera) resulted in a decrease in the number of discrepencies between purified allergens and whole extract to 2.8%. Only for 2% of all sera, sensitization to cat was largely explained by IgE reactivity to CA. IgE reactivity to Fel d 1 accounts for 88% of the total IgE response to cat allergens, as was demonstrated by RAST, with Fel d 1 concentrations nearing saturation. Recombinant Fel d 1 performed equally well in the RAST analysis. Recombinant CA was succesfully expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris, and its immune reactivity closely resembled that of its natural counterpart. CONCLUSION: Natural and recombinant Fel d 1 and CA are good candidates for replacing ill-defined cat dander extracts in diagnostics for cat allergy. Although CA is not essential for the vast majority of cat-sensitized patients, some subjects are selectively sensitized to this serum protein.