Comparison of the effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab injection on corneal angiogenesis in an alkali burn induced model

AIM: To investigate the effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab on corneal neovascularization in an alkali burn-induced model of corneal angiogenesis. METHODS: Fifteen Wistar albino rats were divided randomly into 3 groups after chemical cauterization of the cornea. The first group received a single dose of 0.1mL saline solution as a control group whereas second and third groups received a single dose of 2.5mg bevacizumab or 1mg ranibizumab by subconjunctival injection, respectively. After three weeks, the rat corneas were evaluated by biomicroscopy and corneal photographs were taken. The percentage of neovascularization area, length of the longest new vessel, corneal edema and corneal opacity scores were assessed. RESULTS: The analysis of digital photographs showed that the percentage of neovascularization area to the total corneal area, the length of the longest new vessel, corneal edema and opacity scores were significantly lower in both study groups compared to the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the percentage of corneal neovascularization area, the length of the longest new vessel and corneal opacity score were less with bevacizumab than ranibizumab. CONCLUSION: Subconjunctival bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatments may be effective methods in reducing corneal neovascularization. Furthermore, bevacizumab is more effective than ranibizumab in the inhibition of corneal neovascularization.     

Effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs. METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 guinea pigs were chemically cauterized with 75% silver nitrate and 25% potassium nitrate sticks. Fifteen eyes (group 1) received 2 subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (0.1 mL, 1.25 mg) simultaneously with cauterization and 3 days later. Fifteen eyes (group 2) received 2 subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (0.1 mL, 1.25 mg) 3 and 5 days after cauterization. Ten eyes (group 3, control group) received 2 subconjunctival injections of 0.1 mL of balanced salt solution 3 and 5 days after cauterization. After we determined the burn and neovascularization scores for all groups, the animals were killed on the 10th day. The percentages of neovascularization on the surface of the cornea were measured in terms of pixels on digital photographs. The average number of vessels at maximally vascularized areas was determined for each specimen. RESULTS: Neovascularization score was 1.1 +/- 0.3 in group 1, 2.46 +/- 1.3 in group 2, and 3.5 +/- 0.5 in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The area of neovascularization at the cornea surface was 15.6% +/- 10.1% in group 1, 19.74% +/- 11.2% in group 2, and 23.5% +/- 7.4% in the control group (P = 0.194). The average number of neovascular vessels at group 1 was significantly reduced in comparison with group 2 and the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab decreases the extent of chemically induced corneal neovascularization in guinea pigs. The antineovascular effect of bevacizumab is higher if the injection is performed simultaneously with the chemical cauterization.     

The Effect of Bevacizumab on Corneal Neovascularization in Rabbits

Purpose

To determine the efficacy of topical application and subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization.

Methods

Corneal neovascularization was induced with a silk suture of the corneal stroma in 12 rabbits (24 eyes). One week after suturing, four rabbits were treated with topical bevacizumab at 5 mg/mL (group A) and another four rabbits were treated with topical bevacizumab 10 mg/mL (group B) in the right eyes twice a day for two weeks. A subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab 1.25 mg/mL was done in the right eyes of four rabbits (group C). All of the left eyes (12 eyes) were used as controls. The area of corneal neovascularization was measured after one and two weeks, and the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in corneal tissue was measured after two weeks.

Results

The neovascularized area was smaller in all treated groups than in the control group (p<0.001). Upon analysis of the neovascularized area, there was no significant difference between groups A and B. However, the mean neovascularized area of group B was significantly smaller than that of group C after two weeks of treatment (p=0.043). The histologic examination revealed fewer new corneal vessels in all treated groups than the control group. The concentration of VEGF was significantly lower in all treated groups compared to the control group (p<0.01), but no difference was shown between treated groups.

Conclusions

Topical and subconjunctival bevacizumab application may be useful in the treatment of corneal neovascularization and further study is necessary.     

结膜下注射贝伐单抗对兔角膜新生血管的抑制作用

目的 观察碱烧伤后不同时间结膜下注射贝伐单抗（Bevacizumab）角膜新生血管（CNV）的形成与转归.方法 新西兰白兔54只,制成单眼碱烧伤模型,随机分为3组,每组18只眼,A组碱烧伤后结膜下立即注射贝伐单抗2.5 mg（0.1 ml）,B组碱烧伤后3d结膜下注射贝伐单抗2.5 mg（0.1 ml）,C组结膜下注射生理盐水0.1ml,为对照组.共观察28 d.裂隙灯显微镜下观察角膜新生血管生长情况,行眼前段照相并计算其面积,伤后7、14、28 d各组随机取6例角膜行共焦显微镜检查,观察角膜组织炎性细胞浸润情况及角膜新生血管形态学变化.结果 A、B及C组角膜新生血管开始出现的时间分别为（5.9＋0.8）d、（3.5＋0.6）d及（3.4＋1.1）d,其中A组明显较C组延长（P＜0.05）,B组与C组差异无统计学意义（P =0.068）.伤后各时间点A、B组角膜新生血管的生长面积均明显较C组减少（P＜0.05）,A组与B组角膜新生血管面积比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.共焦显微镜检查可见C组烧伤区大量炎性细胞浸润及新生血管形成,而A组角膜炎性细胞较少,烧伤区无新生血管形成,B组见少量新生血管侵入烧伤区.3组基质层均可见纤维及瘢痕组织增生,其中治疗组纤维增生程度与瘢痕组织均较对照组轻.结论 结膜下注射贝伐单抗可抑制角膜炎性细胞形成,改善损伤角膜基质,促进角膜愈合,从而减少碱烧伤引起的角膜新生血管的生长,在早期注射能取得更好的疗效.     

Combined scraping,coagulation, and subconjunctival bevacizumab in corneal transplantation for bullous keratopathy with corneal neovascularization

PurposeThis study investigated clinical outcomes of the combined method of scraping, coagulation, and subconjunctival bevacizumab for the treatment of corneal neovascularization (NV) in penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).MethodsThis study included patients undergoing PKP who were diagnosed with bullous keratopathy with dense subepithelial scarring that was not suitable for Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Corneal NV was treated by scraping the corneal epithelium and lightly coagulating the superficial corneal stromal NV combined with subconjunctival bevacizumab injection at the end of surgery. Patients without corneal NV were used as the control group.ResultsThere were six patients with vascularized corneas in the study group and three patients without vascularized corneas in the control group. The original corneal NV in the study group disappeared in all patients after surgery. Three of the six (50%) study patients experienced recurrent corneal NV. One of the three (33%) control patients developed corneal NV. These patients had no corneal NV recurrences over the next 6 months after repeat treatment. In both groups, no graft failure or chronic epithelial defects occurred.ConclusionThe combination of scraping the corneal epithelium, coagulating the superficial corneal stromal NV and the feeding vessels in the sclera after peritomy, and subconjunctival bevacizumab injection is an effective method to treat corneal NV in corneal transplantation for bullous keratopathy.     

The inhibitory effect of different concentrations of topical bevacizumab on corneal neovascularization

Acta Ophthalmol. 2010: 88: 862–867

Abstract.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different concentrations of topically administered bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization (NV) in rats. Methods: Corneal NV was induced by chemical cauterization with silver nitrate sticks applied to the centre of the corneas of 37 Wistar rats. The rats were then randomized to four topical treatment groups: group 1 (n = 10) received 4 mg/ml bevacizumab; group 2 (n = 9) received 2 mg/ml bevacizumab; group 3 (n = 10) received 1 mg/ml bevacizumab, and group 4 (n = 8) represented a control group and received saline. All drops were initiated immediately after cauterization and applied twice per day for 7 days. Corneal NV was assessed 8 days after cauterization in a masked fashion, both qualitatively by clinical evaluation and quantitatively by blood vessel count in photographs of histological sections. Results: On clinical evaluation, groups 1 and 2 showed significantly less NV compared with the saline‐treated control group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.024, respectively). Histopathological evaluation showed that only group 1 differed significantly from controls (5% significance level) and normal corneal epithelium was seen in all groups. Conclusions: Topically administered bevacizumab at a concentration of 4 mg/ml significantly reduces corneal NV according to both clinical and histopathological evaluations; lower concentrations were less effective on both parameters. No corneal epitheliopathy was found using these concentrations.     

Inhibition of experimental corneal neovascularization by using subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (Avastin)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) administration on corneal neovascularization (NV) in rabbits. METHODS: NV was induced by placing a suture at the corneal periphery of the right eye of 20 rabbits. Immediately after suturing and again 1 week later, rabbits were divided into 2 groups and administered a subconjunctival injection of normal saline (control) or bevacizumab (Avastin; 5 mg/0.2 mL), respectively. On day 14, digital photographs of the cornea were taken and analyzed to determine the area of the cornea covered by NV. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis was used to determine CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in corneal tissue. RESULTS: Analysis of digital photographs showed that there was less corneal NV in bevacizumab-treated eyes than in controls (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). In addition, there was less staining for VEGF and CD31 in corneas from bevacizumab-treated eyes than in control eyes. Subconjunctival bevacizumab injections were not associated with any complications during observation. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival bevacizumab administration decreased suture-induced corneal neovascularization in rabbits.     

Bevacizumab inhibits corneal neovascularization in an alkali burn induced model of corneal angiogenesis

BACKGROUND: New and uncontrolled blood vessel development in the cornea is a pivotal process in the pathogenesis of several corneal diseases. These corneal diseases may finally cause blindness and managing them therapeutically is problematic. The data supporting a causal role for vascular endothelial growth factor in corneal neovascularization are extensive. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) on experimental corneal neovascularization in rabbits. METHODS: Chemical cauterization of the cornea was performed by touching central cornea with a 5-mm-diameter NaOH-soaked cotton applicator for 10 s in 20 eyes of 20 White New Zealand rabbits. The rabbits were then divided randomly into two equal groups. Bevacizumab (2.5 mg) was administered to 10 eyes (group 1) by a subconjunctival injection immediately after chemical cauterization of corneal surface. As a control, 10 eyes (group 2) received an injection of distilled water. Rabbits were examined daily for detection of the first signs of neovascularization. Three weeks later, the extent of corneal neovascularization was evaluated by direct examination and photograph analyses. Total corneal neovascularization area, degree of circumference involved and longest neovascular pedicle length were assessed. RESULTS: Bevacizumab significantly decreased the total neovascularization area (P < 0.009), the circumference involved (P < 0.011) and the longest neovascular pedicle length (P < 0.023). CONCLUSION: Local injection of bevacizumab has a significant effect on inhibition of alkali burn-induced corneal neovascularization. This shows the potential value of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab injection for corneal neovascularization

PURPOSE: To report on the clinical use of subconjunctival bevacizumab in patients with corneal neovascularization. METHODS: The charts of 10 consecutive patients with corneal neovascularization who received subconjunctival injections of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) were reviewed. Digital photographs of the cornea were graded by 2 masked observers for density, extent, and centricity of corneal vascularization. Image analysis was used to determine the area of cornea covered by neovascularization as a percentage of the total corneal area. RESULTS: No significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed during 3.5 +/- 1.1 months of follow-up. Seven patients showed partial regression of vessels. The extent decreased from 6.0 +/- 1.2 (SD) clock hours before the injection to 4.6 +/- 1.0 clock hours after bevacizumab injection (P = 0.008). Density decreased from 2.7 +/- 0.2 to 1.9 +/- 0.3, respectively. (P = 0.007). No change was noticed in the centricity of corneal vessels. Corneal neovascularization covered, on average, 14.8% +/- 2.5% (SD) of the corneal surface before the injections, compared with 10.5% +/- 2.8% (P = 0.36, t test) after bevacizumab injection. Therefore, bevacizumab decreased corneal neovascularization by 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term results suggest that subconjunctival bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a partial regression of corneal neovascularization.     

Comparison of the inhibitory effect of different doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab application in an experimental model of corneal neovascularization

AIM: To evaluate the inhibitory effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab as single- and multiple-dose application, and compare their effects on corneal neovascularization in a rat model. METHODS: Thirty adult Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this experimental study. The central cornea of the rats was cauterized chemically. The rats were randomly enrolled into three groups. All groups received subconjunctival injections. In Group 1 (control group, n=10), 0.05 mL 0.9% NaCl solution was injected on the first day. In Group 2 (single-dose group, n=10), 0.05 mL bevacizumab (1.25 mg) was injected on the first day. In Group 3 (multiple-dose group, n=10), four doses of 0.05 mL bevacizumab (1.25 mg) were injected on the first, third, fifth and seventh day. Slit-lamp examination of all rats was performed at the third and ninth day. Digital images of the corneas were taken and analyzed using image analysis software to calculate corneal neovascularization area. All rats were sacrificed on the tenth day. In corneal sections, the number of blood vessels, state of inflammation and collagen formation was evaluated histopathologically. RESULTS: In Group 3, corneal edema grades were significantly lower than Group 1 and Group 2 (P=0.02, and P=0.035, respectively). The mean percentage of neovascularized corneal area in Group 3 was significantly lower than Group 2 (P=0.005). On histopathological examination, Group 2 and Group 3 showed significantly less number of blood vessels than Group 1 (P=0.005, and P=0.001, respectively). Additionally, Group 3 showed significantly less number of blood vessels compared to Group 2 (P=0.019). Inflammation and edema grades were significantly lower in Group 3 compared to Group 1 (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Subconjunctival bevacizumab injection is effective in inhibition of newly formed corneal neovascularization. The multiple-dose bevacizumab treatment seems to be more effective compared to single-dose treatment.     

Inhibition of corneal neovascularization by subconjunctival bevacizumab in an animal model

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab on experimentally induced corneal neovascularization. DESIGN: Experimental animal study. METHODS: Twelve New Zealand white rabbits were involved, divided equally into four groups. Only one eye per rabbit was used. Topical instillation of 10 microl 5% NaOH solution was used, under general anesthesia, to induce corneal neovascularization secondary to corneal alkali burn in groups 2, 3, and 4. A single dose of 3.75 mg (25 mg/ml) bevacizumab was injected subconjunctivally. Group 1 (control group 1) was neither cauterized nor treated. Group 2 (control group 2) received a sham injection of balanced salt solution on day 14. Group 3 was treated on day 14 (after corneal neovascularization had been established). Group 4 was treated on day 1. Digital photographs were obtained and analyzed during the entire 28-day procedure. The area of neovascularization and scarring were measured in terms of the percentage of corneal surface affected. RESULTS: On day 28, the difference of neovascularization between groups 2, 3, and 4 was found to be statistically significant at the .05 level (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]): group 4 (4.7%+/-3.1%).1, one-way ANOVA). No side effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival administration of bevacizumab inhibits corneal neovascularization effectively in the rabbit experimental model, especially if administered early.     

Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization

Objective To report the efficacy of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in patients with corneal neovascularization (NV). Methods This retrospective interventional case study included two eyes of two patients with corneal NV due to aqueous-deficient dry eye with filamentary keratitis in the first case, and corneal graft failure in the second case. Patients received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphologic changes were investigated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and corneal photography. Results Corneal NV was dramatically regressed a week after injection in the first case. In the second case, minor vessels were regressed while the major one did not. No infection or inflammation was observed. No relapse was seen within the follow-up of two to three months. Conclusion Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab may offer an additional strategy for the treatment of corneal NV.     

Comparison of subconjunctivally injected bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib for inhibition of corneal neovascularization in a rat model

AIM:To compare the efficacies of subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium injections for the inhibition of corneal neovascularization in an experimental rat model. METHODS:Sixteen corneas of 16 rats were chemically cauterized and randomized into four groups:bevacizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/1.25mg bevacizumab, ranibizumab group that treated with 0.05mL/0.5mg ranibizumab, pegaptanib group that treated with 0.05mL/0.15mg pegaptanib sodium, and control group that treated with 0.05mL saline solution. Digital photographs of the corneas were taken and analyzed using an image analysis software program. All corneas were excised and examined histologically on the 15^th day. RESULTS: Each treatment group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than the control group (all P<0.05). In addition, bevacizumab group had significantly less neovascularized corneal areas and fewer blood vessels than ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups (both P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the ranibizumab and pegaptanib groups regarding percentage of neovascularized corneal areas and number of blood vessels (both P>0.05). CONCLUSION:Subconjunctival bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and pegaptanib sodium were effective with no corneal epitheliopathy for inhibiting corneal neovascularization after corneal burn in rats. Bevacizumab was more effective than ranibizumab and pegaptanib sodium.     

Therapeutic effect of subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with corneal neovascularization. Methods: Twenty‐nine eyes of 29 patients with corneal neovascularization were treated with subconjunctival injection [1.25 mg/0.05 ml (seven eyes), 2.5 mg/0.1 ml (15 eyes) and 5.0 mg/0.2 ml (seven eyes)] of bevacizumab. Best‐corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and area of corneal neovascularization were measured before injection and at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after treatment. Results: At 1 week, the mean neovascularized corneal area decreased significantly to 85.5 ± 18.0% (p = 0.01) in the eyes treated with 2.5 mg bevacizumab and to 73.1 ± 23.4% (p = 0.02) in the eyes treated with 5.0 mg bevacizumab. At 3 months, the mean neovascularized corneal area was 93.6 ± 10.6% (p = 0.10 compared to baseline; p < 0.01 compared to 1 week) in the eyes treated with 2.5 mg bevacizumab and 83.3 ± 25.8% (p = 0.03 compared to baseline; p = 0.02 compared to 1 week) in the eyes treated with 5.0 mg bevacizumab. However, there were no significant changes in the areas of the eyes injected with 1.25 mg bevacizumab. Conclusion: Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab can partially reduce corneal neovascularization in the short term, and the efficacy of this treatment correlates with the injection dose.     

贝伐单抗抑制角膜新生血管的实验研究

目的评价贝伐单抗（avastin）局部应用对小鼠角膜新生血管（CNV）的抑制作用。方法通过碱烧伤建立CNV模型,将30只Balb／c小鼠随机分成5组,A组贝伐单抗1mg／mL每日点眼2次;B组贝伐单抗3mg／mL每日点眼2次;C组贝伐单抗5mg／mL每日点眼2次;D组0．1％地塞米松每日点眼2次;E组生理盐水每日点眼2次。分别于术后3、7、14d观察CNV情况并拍照。术后第14天,处死全部小鼠,行CNV内皮细胞荧光标记,计算CNV所占全角膜面积的比例。结果各组CNV面积为A组（37．11±3．17）％、B组（29．75±3．56）％、C组（18．76±2．55）％、D组（20．91±2．75）％,E组（41．65±2．11）％。各组小鼠CNV面积依次为c组〈D组〈B组〈A组〈E组,C组同A、B、E组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．01）,c组与D组比较差异无统计学意义（P=0．694）。结论局部应用贝伐单抗对小鼠角膜化学烧伤后的CNV有抑制作用。     

The effect of different doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection on corneal neovascularization

To evaluate the effects of various doses of subconjunctival bevacizumab injections in the treatment of patients with corneal neovascularization. During the 6-month-follow-up, no significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed related to the subconjunctival bevacizumab injection. In Group 1, the total area of corneal neovascularization before injection was 14.8 ± 3.2 % of the corneal surface and 10.2 ± 2.8 % 6 months after injection (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 1 was 32.0 ± 3.0 %. In Group 2, the total area of corneal neovascularization before and 6 months after the injection was 14.2 ± 2.5 and 9.8 ± 2.3 %, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean decrease in Group 2 was 31.0 ± 2.3 %. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Twenty-four eyes of 24 patients with corneal neovascularization who were treated with a subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen eyes were treated with 2.5 mg/0.1 ml (Group 1), and 10 eyes were treated with 5.0 mg/0.2 ml (Group 2) of subconjunctival bevacizumab. Digital photographs of the cornea were used to determine the area of corneal neovascularization before injection and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. Subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab is well tolerated and associated with a partial regression of corneal neovascularization. The efficacy of this treatment is not correlated to the injection dose.     

Inhibition of corneal neovascularization after alkali burn: comparison of different doses of bevacizumab in monotherapy or associated with dexamethasone

Background: To compare the effects of different doses of bevacizumab with both saline and dexamethasone on inflammatory angiogenesis in the rat cornea induced by small chemical lesions. Methods: Corneal chemical cauterization was performed on 24 rats. Animals were divided randomly into six groups and received a daily subconjunctival injection for 7 days of: balanced salt solution 0.1 mL or dexamethasone phosphate 4 mg/day or bevacizumab 2.5 mg/day, 3.75 mg/day, 5.0 mg/day or bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day + dexamethasone phosphate 4 mg/day. Clinical examination under slit lamp was performed daily for 7 days to evaluate corneal opacity and vessel size evolution. Computer‐assisted quantitative image analysis was used to measure the total corneal area covered by neovascularization. Results: At final examination, the dexamethasone, bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day and dexamethasone + bevacizumab groups showed a significant lowering in corneal opacity score as compared with control (P = 0.024, P = 0.006 and P = 0.013, respectively). Also, a significant reduction on new vessels size score was observed. Surface of corneal neovascularization was significantly reduced in dexamethasone, bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day and dexamethasone + bevacizumab groups compared with control (P = 0.045, P = 0.047 and P = 0.044, respectively). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the ability of a 5.0 mg/day bevacizumab subconjunctival injection, in monotherapy or associated with dexamethasone, to cause a short‐term involution of corneal neovascularization after corneal alkali burn. Combination of both of these treatments may have advantages to monotherapy approaches.     

Avastin两种用药方法抑制大鼠角膜碱烧伤后早期新生血管增生的比较

目的:探讨avastin滴眼液和结膜下注射方法对SD大鼠角膜碱烧伤后早期新生血管增生的影响。方法:制作SD大鼠角膜碱烧伤动物模型,随机分成3组,A组(对照组)、B组(avastin滴眼液组)、C组(avastin结膜下注射组),每组20只。各组分别在烧伤后3,5,7,14d应用裂隙灯显微镜观察角膜新生血管(cornealneovascu-larization,CNV)增生情况,拍照并计算CNV面积变化。同时每组各处死大鼠5只,摘取角膜组织,采用免疫组织化学方法检测VEGFR-2的表达,免疫荧光法检测CD31表达。结果:A组在伤后各时段CNV增生面积均大于B,C组;B,C组伤后各个时段VEGFR-2及CD31的表达均显著低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);而B,C两组之间CNV增生面积及伤后各时段VEGFR-2及CD31的表达差异无统计学意义(P>0.01)。结论:角膜碱烧伤后早期应用avastin滴眼液和结膜下注射均能有效地抑制CNV生成。     

Avastin对大鼠角膜新生血管的抑制及超微结构的影响

目的:探讨Avastin对角膜新生血管形成及角膜内血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的影响及其超微结构的影响。方法:Wistar大鼠96只随机分3组,采用碱烧伤的方法制备大鼠角膜新生血管模型;正常不烧伤组4只。烧伤后隔日球结膜下注射0.1mL生理盐水组32只,烧伤后隔日球结膜下注射Avastin0.1mL组32只,烧伤后隔日球结膜下注射地塞米松0.1mL组32只。碱烧伤术后在裂隙灯显微镜下观察大鼠角膜混浊度;宏观测量新生血管长度;组织病理切片HE染色作微血管计数;透射电镜观察超微结构的改变;免疫组化检测角膜VEGF的蛋白表达情况;CD34标记新生血管,显微镜下微血管计数方法研究角膜新生血管形成及抑制情况。结果:治疗组在3,7,10,14d较对照组角膜混浊程度轻(P<0.05);14d形成的新生血管数量较对照组少(P<0.05)。实验组新生血管微血管数量减少,VEGF蛋白表达下降,具有统计学差异。VEGF主要表达在角膜受损区的感染细胞胞质内,其出现时间与位置与角膜新生血管一致。Avastin和地塞米松均可有效抑制角膜新生血管,减少角膜内VEGF表达,两者无统计学差异,结膜下注射Avastin和地塞米松后,大鼠角膜超微结构无除烧伤后其它显著改变。结论:Avastin和地塞米松可抑制角膜新生血管,减少角膜内VEGF表达,对角膜的超微结构均无显著毒性。     

贝伐单抗联合曲安奈德治疗穿透性角膜移植术后新生血管

目的：观察球结膜下注射贝伐单抗和曲安奈德治疗穿透性角膜移植术后新生血管的临床疗效。
　　方法：对19例20眼因眼外伤行穿透性角膜移植术后3mo,新生血管增生达到Ⅲ度以上患眼随机分为四组。 A组：对照组;B组：贝伐单抗2.5mg(0.1mL);C组：贝伐单抗及曲安奈德各0.1mL;D 组：曲安奈德0.1mL;每月1次,共两次球结膜下注射药物。
　　结果：平均随访3a,B组和C组视力保持稳定或稍有增进,新生血管和免疫反应明显减退(P<0.01),患者眼痛、畏光流泪症状减轻。
　　结论：贝伐单抗联合曲安奈德在治疗穿透性角膜移植术后新生血管的过程中能够有效减退新生血管,并减轻排斥反应,对保持植片的透明性有积极的治疗作用。