Comparative study of 1 DD and 2 DD radius conventional internal limiting membrane peeling in large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes: a randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo compare the surgical outcomes of 1-disc diameter (DD) and 2-DD conventional internal limiting membrane peeling (C-ILMP) in large full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs).Materials and methodsA prospective randomized controlled trial. One hundred patients with large idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) were randomized into C-ILMP and extended C-ILMP (EC-ILMP) groups. The primary outcome was closure rate at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were visual acuity (VA), closure type, consequence of ILMP and complications.ResultsThe mean symptom duration was 12.19 ± 9.64 months. Mean preoperative VA was 1.25 ± 0.37 logMAR. The average minimum linear diameter was 633.05 ± 129.82 µm and basal linear dimension was 1158.49 ± 249.07 µm. The two groups did not differ in term of demographic data. Closure rate was significantly higher in the EC-ILMP group (76.47% vs. 51.02%, 95% CI 7.24–43.66; p = 0.008). There were also no significant differences in closure type, central foveal thickness, dissociated optic nerve fibre layer detection, or change in fovea-to-disc distance. There were also no significant differences in postoperative VA (p = 0.069) or visual improvement (mean 0.39 ± 0.43 logMAR; p = 0.286). According to subgroup analysis, EC-ILMP resulted in a higher closure rate in patients with chronic FTMH for >6 months, (p = 0.008). Furthermore, EC-ILMP resulted in better anatomical closure and visual result in patients with FTMH with macular hole closure index ≤0.5, p = 0.003 and p = 0.010, respectively.ConclusionExtended C-ILMP yielded a significantly higher closure rate in large FTMHs, but visual outcome did not differ significantly. According to subgroup analysis, extended C-ILMP was more effective in chronic large FTMH with MHCI ≤ 0.5.Subject terms: Retinal diseases, Outcomes research     

Indistinct retinal outer layers in the walls of the idiopathic full-thickness macular hole - A potential predictive biomarker for surgical outcomes

Purpose:To evaluate the absence of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (indistinct retinal outer layers, I-ROL) in the walls of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) circumferentially on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and its correlation with surgical outcome.Methods:In this retrospective observational study, OCT images of patients undergoing vitrectomy for FTMHs with at least 3-months of postoperative follow-up were analyzed for preoperative circumferential extent of I-ROL. Derived macular hole indices such as hole form factor (HFF), macular hole index (MHI), tractional hole index (THI), and hole diameter ratio (HDR) were also calculated. The circumferential extent of I-ROL was correlated with derived hole indices as well as anatomical closure, foveal architecture, and restoration of ELM following surgery.Results:All nine eyes (eight patients) with FTMH (mean size: 610.11 ± 122.95 microns) in the study showed I-ROL in ≥1 quadrant. The mean HFF, MHI, THI, and HDR values were 0.72 ± 0.09, 0.35 ± 0.05, 0.71 ± 0.24, and 0.53 ± 0.14, respectively. All eyes achieved type-1 hole closure with improvement in best-corrected visual acuity to 0.58 ± 0.32 LogMAR from 0.81 ± 0.26 LogMAR. Regular foveal architecture was achieved in six eyes. Out of these, five eyes had I-ROL in ≥2 quadrants, and one eye had I-ROL in <2 quadrants (P = 0.0476). Restoration of ELM was seen in aforementioned six eyes (complete = 5, partial = 1). Out of the five eyes with complete ELM restoration, four had a circumferential extent of I-ROL in ≥2 quadrants (P = 0.0476). Complete restoration of ELM was associated with the complete restoration of the ellipsoid zone in three eyes.Conclusion:Preoperative circumferential extent of I-ROL in FTMH walls can be a potential predictive OCT marker for the type of closure, postoperative foveal architecture, and ELM restoration.     

Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study

Purpose:To evaluate the outcome of vitrectomy with multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique (ML-IILM) versus vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling for large macular holes in terms of visual acuity and anatomical closure.Methods:A hospital-based, prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted during three calendar years with a total 150 eyes (75 in each group) in two groups—vitrectomy with ILM peeling (Group A) and vitrectomy with ML-IILM flap technique (Group B) after informed consent of study participants who met the inclusion criteria.Results:The mean minimum and maximum diameter of macular hole did not differ statistically in both the groups. Macular hole index had no significant difference between both groups Pre-operative visual acuity was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. During follow-up, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months was significantly better in Group B (0.12 ± 0.07 at 1 month, 0.14 ± 0.10 at 3 months, 0.18 ± 0.11 at 6 months, and 0.19 ± 0.12 at 12 months) compared to Group A (0.20 ± 0.11 at 1 month, 0.22 ± 0.13 at 3 months, 0.30 ± 0.12 at 6 months, and 0.31 ± 0.14 at 12 months) (P = 0.001 for each). Type 1 anatomical closure (flattening of cuff and opposition of edges of hole) was achieved in 78.66% (59/75) cases in Group A and 93.33% (70/75) cases in Group B (P 0.0016).Conclusion:Vitrectomy with multilayered inverted ILM flap technique had significantly higher anatomical closure and better visual outcome than vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling.     

Internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole: Tailoring the rhexis to the shape of the hole

Purpose:To report a simple modification of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling tailored to the shape of the macular hole to improve the closure rates.Methods:This is a single-center interventional case series. conducted between 2016 and 2020. The minimum follow-up was 4 months. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. Twenty consecutive patients (21 eyes) with large idiopathic macular holes (horizontal diameter: ≥600 μm) were enrolled; vertical hole diameters were also measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Following vitrectomy, ILM peeling was performed over a horizontally oval area (additional 1 disc-diameter temporally); perfluoropropane gas (C3F8, 15%) tamponade was used. Hole closure and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were monitored after absorption of the gas. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuities were compared using paired t-test. IBM SPSS (ver. 26) was used for analysis.Results:The macular holes were horizontally oval rather than circular without exception: mean horizontal and vertical diameters were 714 μm (range: 600–1020 μm) and 602 μm (490–844 μm), respectively. Following vitrectomy, macular hole closure was obtained in 20/21 eyes by the last follow-up (mean: 28 months, median: 34 months; range 4–48 months). Mean Snellen BCVA improved from 20/200 to 20/63 (P < 0.0001).Conclusion:All the macular holes in the study were observed to be horizontally oval. A corresponding horizontal enlargement of the ILM rhexis yielded excellent anatomical and satisfactory visual outcomes.     

Surgical outcome of full-thickness macular hole secondary to tractional retinal detachment in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Purpose:To evaluate the surgical outcome of full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) secondary to active fibrovascular proliferation (FVP) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and factors influencing the outcome.Methods:This retrospective study included the patients who underwent vitrectomy for FTMH secondary to PDR TRD from 2016 to 2020. Anatomical and visual outcomes were analyzed after six months along with the factors predicting the final outcome and duration of subretinal fluid (SRF) resolution.Results:Group A (macula-off combined RD, i.e., tractional and rhegmatogenous) included 10 eyes, while group B (macula-threatening TRD) included eight eyes. The mean best-corrected visual acuity improved from logMAR 1.21 (Snellen equivalent: 20/324) to logMAR 0.76 (Snellen equivalent: 20/115) (P = 0.008). Seventeen patients gained ≥1 line(s) of vision. Mean visual gain in groups A and B was 3.7 ± 1.9 and 1.9 ± 1.1 lines, respectively (P = 0.051). MH closed in 88.9% eyes. Type 1 anatomical closure was achieved in 88.9% of eyes. At 6 months, SRF and central macular thickness reduced from 479.6 ± 512.5 μm to 11.4 ± 23.5 μm (P = 0.002) and 874.3 ± 422.6 μm to 207.6 ± 81.7 μm (P = 0.0002), respectively. Finally, macular SRF resolved in all the patients. The mean duration for complete SRF resolution was 4.9 ± 3.2 months. Eyes with a shorter duration of diabetes mellitus (rho = −0.49, P = 0.040) and macula-off combined RD (P = 0.048) took a longer time for complete SRF resolution.Conclusion:Good anatomical and visual outcomes can be achieved in eyes with PDR TRD-associated FTMH. The residual macular SRF resolves slowly after the surgery and extra intervention is not required. Macula-off combined RD is associated with worse outcome and a slower SRF resolution rate.     

Factors affecting anatomical and visual outcome after macular hole surgery: findings from a large prospective UK cohort

ObjectivesTo reassess the definition of a large macular hole, factors predicting hole closure and post-surgery visual recovery.DesignDatabase study of 1483 primary macular hole operations. Eligible operations were primary MH operations treated with a vitrectomy and a gas or air tamponade. Excluded were eyes with a history of retinal detachment, high myopia, previous vitrectomy or trauma.ResultsA higher proportion of operations were performed in eyes from females (71.1%) who were ‘on average’ younger (p < 0.001), with slightly larger holes (p < 0.001) than male patients. Sulfur hexafluoride gas was generally used for smaller holes (p < 0.001). From 1253 operations with a known surgical outcome, successful hole closure was achieved in 1199 (96%) and influenced by smaller holes and complete ILM peeling (p < 0.001), but not post-surgery positioning (p = 0.072). A minimum linear diameter of ~500 μm marked the threshold where the success rate started to decline. From the 1056 successfully closed operations eligible for visual outcome analysis, visual success (defined as visual acuity of 0.30 or better logMAR) was achieved in 488 (46.2%) eyes. At the multivariate level, the factors predicting visual success were better pre-operative VA, smaller hole size, shorter duration of symptoms and the absence of AMD.ConclusionsFemales undergoing primary macular hole surgery tend to be younger and have larger holes than male patients. The definition of a large hole should be changed to around 500 μm, and patients should be operated on early to help achieve a good post-operative VA.Subject terms: Outcomes research, Retinal diseases     

Técnica modificada del flap invertido superior con vitrectomía versus vitrectomía con pelado de membrana limitante interna para el desprendimiento de retina con agujero macular miópico

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of the modified superior inverted internal limiting (ILM) membrane flap technique in retinal reattachment, macular hole closure and external retinal layers restoration in macular hole associated retinal detachment compared to ILM peeling.MethodsRetrospective case series of 10 patients that required pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment with macular hole followed for more than 12 months. Data from medical records were retrospectively collected and patients were divided into the superior inverted flap (5 patients) and ILM peeling group (5 patients). We compared best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after surgery, retinal attachment, macular hole closure rate and external retinal layer restoration between groups.ResultsThere were significant improvements in BCVA in both groups before and after surgery, with no differences between the two groups at 12 months after surgery (P = .9). The macular hole closed in 100% of cases in the inverted flap group and 80% of the ILM peeling group with no significant differences between groups. The retina was reattached in 100% of cases in both groups. Only 2 patients in the inverted flap group (40%) had external retinal layer restoration and none in ILM peeling group (P = .62).ConclusionsILM peeling and superior inverted flap techniques are useful for treating retinal detachment with macular hole in myopic eyes.     

Postoperative microstructural re-modelling and functional outcomes in idiopathic full thickness macular hole

Purpose:To analyze the effect of various macular hole indices and postoperative microstructural changes of all retinal layers on postoperative functional outcomes in patients with idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).Methods:In this prospective study, pre and post-operative optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans of 36 eyes with idiopathic FTMH were analyzed. Hole indices and microstructural changes of all retinal layers such as ellipsoid zone (EZ), external limiting membrane (ELM) integrity, outer and inner retinal defects, and cystoid resolution were studied on follow-up visits.Results:Out of 36 eyes, type-1 closure was achieved in 23 eyes (65.7%) and type-2 closure in 11 eyes (31.42%), one eye showed persistent hole, and one eye was lost to follow-up. The mean minimum diameter of hole (P = 0.026), mean MHI (P = 0.001), DHI (P = 0.158), THI (P = 0.001), and HFF (P < 0.001) showed statistical significance with the type of hole closure. Postoperatively, eyes with intact ELM and EZ had better BCVA at the final visit. The BCVA was better by logMAR 0.73 ± 0.38 (P < 0.001) in patients with absent outer retinal defects. There was a significant difference in BCVA of 0.52 ± 0.35 at 1 month and 0.64 ± 0.34 at 6 months in eyes without inner retinal defects (P < 0.001). At 6 months, cystoid resolution was observed in 28 (80%) eyes. BCVA was significantly better at 1 month (P < 0.001) and at 6 months (P = 0.001) in eyes with no DONFL.Conclusion:Macular hole indices determine the closure type. Postoperative regeneration of outer retinal layers and resolution of retinal defects significantly influence the final visual outcomes. ELM recovery is seen as a prerequisite for EZ regeneration with no new IRD after a period of 3 months.     

Silicone oil tamponade for persistent macular holes

BackgroundA variety of treatment strategies have been proposed for macular holes that persist or recur after surgery, and the debate about the best re-treatment approach is ongoing. To allow for a comparison with alternative surgical therapies, we assessed the anatomical and functional outcome of a temporary tamponade with conventional silicone oil in persistent or recurrent full-thickness macular holes.MethodsWe retrospectively investigated consecutive patients with full-thickness macular holes that persisted or recurred following vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade. All patients received re-treatment by temporary tamponade of silicone oil and were allowed free postoperative positioning. Anatomical closure rate was assessed by optical coherence tomography, and change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was analyzed.ResultsA total of 33 eyes of 33 consecutive patients were included. Macular hole closure following silicone oil tamponade was achieved in 30 of 33 eyes (90.9%). Median BCVA improved from 1.00 logMAR (interquartile range, 0.60–1.00) to 0.65 logMAR (0.49–1.00; p = 0.010) after silicone oil removal. In patients with macular hole closure, 61.3% exhibited functional improvement with median BCVA changing from 1.00 logMAR (0.70–1.00) to 0.60 logMAR (0.49–1.00; p = 0.0005). Mean minimal linear diameter of macular holes before primary surgery was 391.0 µm (±137.8; range 133–630), and 48.5% of macular holes were >400 µm in diameter.ConclusionsTreatment of persistent or recurrent full-thickness macular holes by temporary conventional silicone oil tamponade without postoperative positioning results in a high closure rate and a significant mean improvement of visual acuity.Subject terms: Outcomes research, Retinal diseases     

Evaluation of predictors for anatomical success in macular hole surgery in Indian population

Purpose:The aim was to evaluate outcomes and predictors for anatomical success in macular hole (MH) surgery.Results:Of the 62 eyes operated, anatomical closure of MH was achieved in 55 eyes (88.7%). The median duration of follow-up was 8 months (range: 6–15 months). Mean BVCA improved from 0.94 ± 0.26 at baseline to 0.40 ± 0.23 logMAR at last follow-up (P = 0.01). There was a statistically significant association between size of ILM peel and anatomical closure of MH (P = 0.04). Duration of symptoms, size of MH, type of gas tamponade, MHI had no effect on anatomical closure (P = 0.22, 0.28, 0.40 respectively, Chi-square test). Postoperative continuity of the ELM was significantly associated with a shorter symptom duration (<6 months) before surgery.Conclusion:Acceptable anatomical closure could be attained with the defined technique. Size of ILM peel is a new predictor of anatomical success while symptom duration affects postoperative ELM continuity.     

Long-term follow-up of primary silicone oil tamponade for retinal detachment secondary to macular hole in highly myopic eyes: a prognostic factor analysis

PurposeTo investigate the risk factors associated with retinal detachment recurrence after first vitrectomy in high myopic eyes with macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD).MethodsPatients with high myopic eyes with MHRD who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil (SO) tamponade with a follow-up period more than 12 months and more than 3 months after SO removal were included in this retrospective study. Logistic regression was performed to determine the risk factors associated with retinal re-detachment.ResultsA total of 45 eyes from 43 patients were included in this study (11 male and 34 female patients). The retinal re-detachment rate after the first removal of silicon oil was 35.5% (16/45) in a mean postoperative follow-up time of 35.64 ± 32.94 months. Complete macular atrophy on fundus photography (odds ratio (OR) = 17.021, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.218–130.609, p = 0.006) was a risk factor for MHRD after SO removal, while internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (OR = 0.091, 95% CI: 0.013–0.633, p = 0.015) and duration of SO tamponade (OR = 0.667, 95% CI: 0.454–0.980, p = 0.039) were protective factors.ConclusionFor high myopic eyes with MHRD, complete macular atrophy was a significant risk factor for retinal re-detachment after silicon oil removal. ILM peeling and the duration of silicon oil tamponade were protective factors.Subject terms: Retinal diseases, Risk factors     

Comparison of fovea-sparing and non-internal limiting membrane peeling for retinoschisis with foveal detachment in highly myopic eyes

PurposeTo compare the visual and anatomical outcomes of two different treatment strategies (non-internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and fovea-sparing ILM peeling) for retinoschisis with foveal detachment (FD) in highly myopic eyes.DesignA retrospective cohort study.MethodsNinety-five eyes from 92 highly myopic patients with retinoschisis with FD were divided into two groups, including 44 eyes from 43 patients who received 23-gauge, 3-port vitrectomy without ILM peeling (group A) and 51 eyes from 49 patients who received vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling (group B). All eyes also underwent cataract surgery.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, diopters, axial length (AL), or central foveal thickness (CFT) before surgery (P > 0.05). One month after surgery, foveoschisis and FD were resolved in 74.47% of the eyes in group B and in only 12.50% of those in group A. Six months after surgery, foveoschisis and FD were resolved in 96.08% of the eyes in group B and in only 72.73% of those in group A (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of BCVA 6 months after surgery. The postoperative complication was macular holes, which were found in seven eyes (15.90%) in group A and in one eye (1.96%) in group B (P < 0.05).ConclusionHighly myopic eyes with FD that underwent fovea-sparing ILM peeling appeared to obtain a better anatomical outcome than those that did not undergo non-ILM peeling. The two procedures obtained similar results in terms of visual function.Subject terms: Retinal diseases, Vision disorders

Myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment had been treated by vitrectomy without ILM peeling as well as foveal sparing ILM peeling in an attempt to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications. We performed this retrospective study to assess which is the best method for improving anatomical and functional outcomes, and to reduce the incidence of postoperative macular holes.

Myopic retinopathy is one of the most common causes of irreversible visual impairment and blindness due to the high incidence rate of high myopia [1]. Myopic foveoschisis (MF), a common finding in the macula of highly myopic eyes [2], is one of the major causes of poor vision in eyes with pathologic myopia. Based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the macular region, MF can be divided into three stages: isolated retinoschisis, retinoschisis with foveal detachment (FD), and retinoschisis with a macular hole (MH) [3]. Patients with isolated retinoschisis may have stable vision for a long time. However, when retinoschisis progresses to FD or FD progresses to MH, the patient’s visual acuity drops sharply, and MH retinal detachment may easily develop [4]. Thus, stage II (retinoschisis with FD) is the best time to start surgical treatment.At present, the mainstream treatment for retinoschisis with FD is vitrectomy. Studies have shown that vitrectomy could result in good anatomical and visual outcomes in highly myopic eyes [5–15]. However, how to address the ILM remains controversial. Some studies proposed vitrectomy without ILM peeling and showed that the prevalence of postoperative MH was much lower than that in ILM peeling cases, but the recovery rate may not be satisfactory [12, 16]. In contrast, people who promote ILM peeling believe that it can increase the recovery rate but that postoperative MH may occur (8–18%) [17, 18] and result in poor postoperative VA. Recently, some researchers have proposed a fovea-sparing ILM technique to reduce the risk of iatrogenic MH formation [19–24]. Could fovea-sparing ILM peeling increase the anatomic resolution and reduce the incidence of postoperative MHs in FD patients at the same time? Comparing non-ILM peeling with fovea-sparing ILM peeling, which procedure is better? For these purposes, we designed this study. This study analyzed 95 eyes from 92 patients with MS and FD treated with PPV without ILM peeling or with ILM peeling that avoided the foveal area to determine which procedure is better for treating this disease.     

Displacement of foveal area toward optic disc after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling

Purpose

To determine whether there is a displacement of the fovea toward the optic disc after successful macular hole (MH) surgery with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.

Methods

The medical records of 54 eyes of 53 patients that had undergone pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling and gas or air tamponade for an idiopathic MH were evaluated. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) had been performed before and >6 months after the surgery. The preoperative distances between the center of the MH and the optic disc (MH-OD), center of the MH and the bifurcation or crossing of retinal vessels (MH-RV) were measured in the OCT images. In addition, the postoperative distance between the center of the fovea and optic disc (F-OD) and the center of the fovea and the same bifurcation or crossing of retinal vessels (F-RV) were measured in the OCT images.

Results

The F-OD was 2.67±0.33 disc diameters (DD), which was significantly shorter than that of the MH-OD of 2.77±0.33 DD (P<0.001). The F-RV was also significantly shorter than the MH-RV on the inner nasal area (from 0.85±0.16DD to 0.79±0.15DD; P<0.001), the inner temporal area (from 0.82±0.15DD to 0.77±0.14DD; P<0.001), and outer nasal area (from 1.70±0.31DD to 1.65±0.32DD; P<0.001), but it was significantly longer than the MH-RV in the outer temporal area (from 1.65±0.29DD to 1.68±0.29DD; P<0.001).

Conclusion

Our results showed that successful closure of a MH by vitrectomy with ILM peeling and gas tamponade leads to a displacement of the center of the macula toward the optic disc.     

Comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in recalcitrant diabetic macular edema with and without traction in Indian patients

Purpose:To study and compare the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the eyes with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) with and without vitreomacular traction.Methods:A comparative prospective interventional study was undertaken in which group 1 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with DME with vitreomacular tractional component and group 2 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with recalcitrant DME without a tractional component. Both groups underwent standard PPV with ILM peeling. All the patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The parameters evaluated were changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) parameters, and occurrence of any intraoperative/postoperative surgical complication.Results:The mean CMT improved significantly from 540.6 and 490.2 μm at the baseline to 292.5 and 270.6 μm at 6 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean BCVA logMAR improved from 0.78 ± 0.21 to 0.62 ± 0.22 in group 1 and 0.84 ± 0.19 to 0.65 ± 0.21 in group 2 at 6 months follow-up which was not statistically significant. The improvement in the mfERG was seen in group 2 as a significant increase in P1 wave amplitude in ring 2 (2–5°) (P < 0.004) and a significant decrease in P 1 wave implicit time in ring 1 (central 2°) (P < 0.001). None of the eyes suffered from the loss of BCVA or any major surgical complication in either group.Conclusion:PPV in recalcitrant DME provides good anatomical outcomes and the results are comparable in DME with and without a tractional component.     

Evaluation of retinal functional changes after macular hole surgery using heavy brilliant blue G dye for internal limiting membrane staining: A prospective,single blind,randomized controlled trial

Purpose:To evaluate retinal functional changes after idiopathic macular hole (MH) surgery using heavy brilliant blue G (hBBG) dye for internal limiting membrane (ILM) staining.Methods:Forty-four eyes with idiopathic MH were randomized into two groups – 24 eyes undergoing vitrectomy with ILM peeling using hBBG staining and 20 eyes without staining; anatomical and functional status (with microperimetry (MP)) at baseline and during postoperative follow-up were noted and compared.Results:All eyes had closure of MH postoperatively and overall baseline MP indices (average threshold, AT; foveal sensitivity, FS) improved significantly at 6 weeks and 6 months of follow-up. AT and FS showed significant improvement at 6 weeks and 6 months from baseline in both individual groups (P < 0.001). Intergroup comparison showed that there was no statistically significant difference in AT and FS values at any point of time (baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months) between staining and no-stain group. No eyes in our cohort had any unexplained visual loss.Conclusion:Functional parameters of macula improved significantly after successful MH surgery using hBBG for staining the ILM.     

Determination of macular hole size in relation to individual variabilities of fovea morphology

Purpose

To determine the preoperative anatomic factors in macular holes and their correlation to hole closure.

Methods

Forty-six eyes with consecutive unilateral macular hole who had undergone surgery and followed up for at least 6 months were enrolled. Optical coherence tomography images and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) within 2 weeks prior to operation and 6 months after surgery were analyzed. The maximal hole dimension, foveal degeneration factors (inner nuclear layer cysts, outer segment (OS) shortening) and the widest foveolar floor size of the fellow eyes were measured. For overcoming preoperative individual variability of foveal morphology, an ‘adjusted'' hole size parameter (the ratio between the hole size and the fellow eye foveolar floor size) was used based on the fact that both eyes were morphologically symmetrical.

Results

Mean preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.03±0.43 and the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.50±0.38 at 6 months. Preoperative BCVA is significantly associated with postoperative BCVA (P=0.0002). The average hole diameter was 448.9±196.8 μm and the average fellow eye foveolar floor size was 461.3±128.4 μm. There was a correlation between hole diameter and the size of the fellow eye foveolar floor (Pearson''s coefficient=0.608, P<0.0001). The adjusted hole size parameter was 0.979±0.358 (0.761–2.336), which was a strong predictor for both anatomic (P=0.0281) and visual (P=0.0016) outcome.

Conclusion

When determining the extent of preoperative hole size, we have to take into consideration the foveal morphologic variations among individuals. Hole size may be related to the original foveal shape, especially in relation to the centrifugal retraction of the foveal tissues.     

En Face Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Foveal Dots in Eyes With Posterior Vitreous Detachment or Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

PurposeTo analyze the morphology of foveal hyperreflective dots (HRD) identified with en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) and evaluate the effects of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on the number of these lesions.MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study of patients with OCT angiography and en face OCT. Using en face OCT, superficial HRD lying on the foveal floor were measured and quantitated in eyes with ILM peel and in the fellow nonsurgical eyes. Eyes with foveal PVD were also compared to fellow eyes without foveal PVD. High-magnification en face OCT was also performed to better understand the morphology of HRD in the fovea.ResultsEyes that underwent ILM peel (n = 10) displayed fewer HRD (P = 0.012) compared to control fellow nonoperated eyes. In eyes with foveal PVD, the mean number of HRD was numerically greater, but without statistical significance, compared to the contralateral eye without foveal PVD. High-magnification en face OCT illustrated HRD with irregular shapes and fine cilia-like or dendriform extensions. Average length of HRD was between 15 to 21 µm in all four groups.ConclusionsHRD decreased in eyes with ILM peeling by en face OCT compared with fellow nonoperated eyes and exhibited a glial cell-like morphology and size closely resembling the white dot fovea described previously using scanning electron microscopy. HRD may represent processes of activated retinal glia, possibly Muller cells, that traverse defects in the ILM.     

不同黄斑内界膜手术联合空气填充治疗特发性黄斑裂孔

目的:观察改良内界膜翻转覆盖术与传统内界膜剥离术的差异性,分析不同手术方式对裂孔愈合形态的影响.方法:回顾性研究2017-07/2020-06于遵义市第一人民医院就诊的特发性黄斑裂孔患者22例22眼的临床资料,根据手术方式将其分为内界膜剥除组8例8眼和内界膜翻转覆盖组14例14眼,分析两组患者术前及治疗后1wk,1、3...     

微创玻璃体切割术治疗高度近视性黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离的疗效

目的：观察微创玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术治疗高度近视性黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离(macular hole retinal detachment,MHRD)的临床效果。

方法：回顾性非随机临床研究。纳入2011-01/2016-12我院高度近视MHRD患者26例26眼,所有患者均行标准三通道经睫状体平坦部23G微创玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术。术后定期进行最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA)、眼压、裂隙灯眼前节和眼底检查,并用光学相干断层扫描(optical coherence tomography,OCT)检查黄斑裂孔解剖情况。以发病年龄、裂孔Gass分期、发病天数、裂孔闭合形态(W、V、U型)、初始视力5项作为自变量进行Logistic回归分析,探讨影响术后BCVA的因素。

结果：高度近视MHRD术后黄斑裂孔(macular hole,MH)闭合率为58%。依据OCT图像,将高度近视MHRD术后OCT闭合形态分为3类：U型(3眼),相对正常的中心凹形状; V型(4眼),黄斑中心凹较陡; W型(8眼),黄斑中心凹处神经上皮缺损,但裂孔缘未翘起,无囊腔形成。多因素Logistic回归分析结果表明,术后预后视力提高与裂孔闭合OCT形态和初始视力相关(P<0.05),术后U型裂孔闭合视力提高是W型的6.9倍。

结论：微创玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术是治疗高度近视MHRD的有效方式。高度近视MHRD术后视力提高与黄斑裂孔愈合的OCT形态和初始视力相关。     

Current concepts and cutting-edge techniques in myopic macular surgeries

Myopic foveoschisis and macular hole with a retinal detachment are two major diseases associated with posterior staphyloma that are specific to high myopia. The pathogenesis is a combination of various types of traction from the vitreous cortex, epiretinal membrane (ERM), internal limiting membrane (ILM), and microvessels. Foveoschisis typically starts with retinoschisis, and a retinal detachment subsequently develops as a result of traction on the inner retina. The stress on the fovea eventually opens a small hole and leads to retinal detachment from a macular hole; thus, both are closely related. These two pathologies can be treated with vitrectomy. A foveal detachment is the best indication for surgery because of the greatest visual improvement. The routine surgical procedures are vitreous cortex removal with triamcinolone acetonide, ERM peeling, ILM peeling stained with Brilliant Blue G, and gas tamponade. The necessity for ILM peeling and gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis remains controversial. A postoperative macular hole is a severe complication in foveoschisis, and a photoreceptor inner/outer segment defect seen on optical coherence tomography images obtained preoperatively is a risk factor for macular hole. A foveal nonpeeling can be considered to avoid foveal trauma. The inverted ILM peeling technique is a new option to enhance macular hole closure. Both techniques seem to enhance retinal restoration; however, the visual benefit has not been confirmed. A long-shaft forceps facilitates precise maneuvers. Vitrectomy for highly myopic macular diseases remains challenging; however, an understanding of the pathogeneses and innovations in vitreous surgical instruments and techniques will facilitate safer surgeries.