Switching depot antipsychotic drug responders to oral olanzapine

In an open-label study, 13 patients taking depot antipsychotic medication for greater than 3 years were switched to oral olanzapine. The first 3-month experience has been previously reported. We now describe a second 3-month experience and integrate our observations into a cumulative 6-month report. Monthly, we assessed patients using clinical ratings [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Clinical Global Improvement Scale (CGI)] and side effect parameters [Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry psychotropic side effect rating scale (AMDP-5), and weights]. Olanzapine patients showed statistically significant improvement (baseline to endpoint sixth month) in GAF (p=0.015), MMSE (p=0.022), CGI improvement, and AIMS (p=0.038). There was no statistically significant change in PANSS, CGI severity, or AMDP-5 overall side effects. Weight gain over 6 months averaged 8.9 lb. All patients completed the study. Compliance was estimated at 90%, and 81% of patients chose to continue on the oral olanzapine. One patient was hospitalized at the conclusion of the study. Our findings suggest that clinicians may consider oral olanzapine as a viable alternative to depot antipsychotic medications, balancing clinical improvement in some clinical measures with lack of improvement in other clinical measures; and balancing improvement in abnormal involuntary movements with weight gain and its sequelae.     

Reduced thalamic volume in patients with chronic schizophrenia after switching from typical antipsychotic medications to olanzapine

OBJECTIVE: The authors performed a longitudinal study of the effects on thalamic volume of switching from typical to atypical antipsychotic medications. METHOD: Magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from 10 subjects with chronic schizophrenia taking typical antipsychotics and 20 healthy volunteers. Subjects with schizophrenia were switched to olanzapine; both groups were rescanned. RESULTS: At baseline, thalamic volumes in subjects with chronic schizophrenia were 5.8% greater than those of healthy volunteers. At follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups. Additional analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between baseline thalamic volume and dosage of typical antipsychotic medication. Higher dosages at baseline were correlated with larger reductions in volume after the switch to olanzapine. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic medication effects may be a factor in the wide range of thalamic volume differences reported between subjects with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.     

Treatment with olanzapine, risperidone or typical antipsychotic drugs in Asian patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical outcomes in Asian patients with schizophrenia receiving monotherapy with olanzapine, risperidone or typical antipsychotics in naturalistic settings. METHOD: In this report, data from the first 12 months of the prospective, observational, 3-year Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study are presented for patients from participating Asian countries (Korea, Taiwan and Malaysia) who were started on, or switched to, monotherapy with olanzapine (n = 484), risperidone (n = 287) or a typical antipsychotic drug (n = 127) at baseline. RESULTS: At 12 months, overall reduction in the score of Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness rating scale was greatest with olanzapine (p < 0.001 vs typical agents), followed by risperidone (p = 0.007 vs typical agents) treatment. Olanzapine treatment was found to have significantly better effects than typical agents on negative and depressive symptom scores, and significantly greater improvements than risperidone on negative and cognitive symptoms. The occurrence of extrapyramidal symptoms was least likely with olanzapine (p < 0.001 vs typical agents, and p = 0.012 vs risperidone), while the estimated odds of tardive dyskinesia were greatest in the typical treatment group (p = 0.046 vs olanzapine, and p = 0.082 vs risperidone). Mean weight increase was greater for olanzapine-treated patients compared with the other agents (p = 0.030 vs typical agents and p < 0.001 vs risperidone). The risk of menstrual disturbance was relatively high with risperidone when compared with olanzapine treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study indicate that, in Asian patients with schizophrenia, olanzapine may offer benefits when compared with typical agents or risperidone. However, the significantly greater odds of weight gain should be considered in the clinical management of olanzapine-treated patients.     

Heat intolerance in patients with chronic schizophrenia maintained with antipsychotic drugs

OBJECTIVE: Schizophrenia may be associated with hyperthermic syndromes such as febrile catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and heatstroke. The authors hypothesized that an exercise-heat tolerance test would disclose abnormal thermoregulation in schizophrenic patients. METHOD: Seven male schizophrenic outpatients in remission maintained on depot antipsychotic treatment and eight healthy comparison subjects completed a heat tolerance test that consisted of two 50-minute bouts of walking a motor-driven treadmill at 40xC (relative humidity=40%). RESULTS: A significantly higher rise in rectal and skin temperatures was observed in the patient group. No differences in heart rate, blood pressure, or perspiration were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Schizophrenic patients maintained on antipsychotic drugs exhibit impaired heat tolerance. Possible explanations are a reduced ability to convey heat from the body's core to the periphery with or without excessive heat production. The hyperthermic response to the heat tolerance test may reflect a dysfunction associated with schizophrenia, a neuroleptic-induced side effect, or both.     

Factors associated with adherence to treatment with olanzapine and other atypical antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia

ObjectivesPoor treatment response is an important factor contributing to lack of treatment adherence. The goals of this research were to determine whether improvements in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) symptom domains predict the likelihood of staying on treatment and whether differential responses to treatment with various atypical antipsychotics in specific symptom domains account for differences in discontinuation rates or treatment adherence.MethodsWe conducted a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from 5 randomized, double-blind, 24- to 28-week clinical trials in 1103 olanzapine-treated and 1090 risperidone-, quetiapine-, ziprasidone-, or aripiprazole-treated adult patients with schizophrenia. The 5 PANSS factors were tested as potential predictors of treatment adherence for all treatment groups combined. Treatment differences in the 5 PANSS factors and individual items were assessed between olanzapine and the other atypical antipsychotics combined. Secondary analyses repeated for the 21 Heinrichs Quality of Life Scale (QLS) items.ResultsImprovement in PANSS positive factor was the strongest predictor of treatment adherence, irrespective of medication (based on standardized scores, hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], +1.40 to +1.79; P < .001). Improvement in PANSS hostility (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, +1.11 to +1.37; P < .001) and depressive (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, +1.05 to +1.27; P = .002) factors was also a significant predictor; negative and disorganized thoughts factors were not. All QLS items had significant predictive effects. Olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvements than all other groups at week 24 on all 5 PANSS factors (P = .028 for negative; P < .001 for all others) and on 3 QLS items.ConclusionSignificant improvement in positive symptoms, regardless of treatment, followed by significant improvement in hostility and depressive symptoms, may best predict treatment adherence. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly greater improvements in these specific symptoms than patients treated with the other atypical antipsychotics examined. These findings may further explain why olanzapine-treated patients continue treatment more often.     

Strategies for switching from conventional antipsychotic drugs or risperidone to olanzapine

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy and safety of 4 therapeutically relevant strategies for switching clinically stable patients from a conventional antipsychotic drug or risperidone to olanzapine. METHOD: Two hundred nine outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder who were clinically stable while being treated with a conventional antipsychotic drug or risperidone were openly randomly assigned to either abrupt or gradual discontinuation of their prior antipsychotic drug. Patients were further randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to immediate olanzapine initiation (olanzapine, 10 mg q.d. for 3 weeks) or stepwise initiation (a sequence of 1 week each on placebo; olanzapine, 5 mg q.d.; and olanzapine, 10 mg q.d.). The efficacy of these 4 switching paradigms was assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)-Improvement scale, Patient's Global Impressions (PGI)-Improvement scale, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Safety assessments included ratings for extrapyramidal symptoms, cognitive impairment, adverse events, laboratory parameters, weight change, and vital signs. RESULTS: The paradigm of gradual antipsychotic drug discontinuation combined with an initial full dose of olanzapine, 10 mg/day, had the most favorable efficacy and tolerability profile overall. By week 3, the majority of completing patients on all 4 switching paradigms were either improved or clinically unchanged (> 90%). No clinically significant differences between switching paradigms were seen in laboratory values or vital signs. CONCLUSION: In this study, switching clinically stable outpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder to olanzapine was most successful when a full therapeutic dose of olanzapine was immediately initiated while gradually discontinuing prior conventional antipsychotic drug or risperidone treatment. Overall, switching was achieved without increased vulnerability to relapse or to occurrence of clinically burdensome antipsychotic drug withdrawal symptoms in the majority of patients.     

Efficacy of risperidone versus olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia previously on chronic conventional antipsychotic therapy: a switch study

The objective of the study was to examine whether patients with schizophrenia who were judged to be stable on long-term treatment with conventional antipsychotic medications would further benefit from a switch to an atypical antipsychotic drug. Thirty-six subjects with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, on conventional antipsychotic medication therapy for at least 2 years, were randomized in double-blind fashion to risperidone versus olanzapine. Patients were titrated up to 6 mg risperidone or 15 mg olanzapine as tolerated, followed by tapering and discontinuation of conventional antipsychotic medication. Atypical antipsychotic agents were then administered alone (monotherapy) for 12 weeks. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale, and Simpson Angus Scale. Body weight was measured at each visit. Both treatment groups exhibited marked and similar improvement in the total PANSS score from baseline to study endpoint (22 weeks) [risperidone: baseline=59.3 (SE 3.1), 22 weeks=44.3 (SE 2.3) (p<0.001); olanzapine: baseline=55.9 (SE 3.3), 22 weeks=46.9 (SE 3.2) (p<0.001). Both groups also exhibited significant reductions in PANSS factor scores for positive and negative symptoms and disorganized thoughts. Only risperidone-treated patients exhibited significant decreases in uncontrolled hostility/excitement and anxiety and depression. Of note, while positive factor scores exhibited the majority of change within the first 10 weeks, negative factor scores continued to decline significantly in both treatment groups throughout the study. Tolerability assessments did not differ between groups. The results indicate that both atypical antipsychotic medications provided significant additional improvement in symptom severity in patients with schizophrenia previously on conventional antipsychotic agents.     

Switching female schizophrenic patients to quetiapine from conventional antipsychotic drugs: effects on hyperprolactinemia

INTRODUCTION: Conventional antipsychotic medications are associated with elevated prolactin levels, resulting in hyperprolactinemia and a number of unwanted side effects. Several atypical antipsychotics, on the other hand, are less likely to evoke hyperprolactinemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of hyperprolactinemia induced by conventional antipsychotic drugs, examine changes in serum prolactin levels and psychiatric symptoms after switching to quetiapine, and identify the relevant characteristics of patients who may be suitable to switch to quetiapine. METHOD: Sixty-nine of 74 consecutive female patients who had received conventional antipsychotic drugs were initially included in the study. Of these, 49 (71 %) patients suffered from hyperprolactinemia, of which a further 25 were subsequently switched to quetiapine. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and serum prolactin levels were measured just before and at 4 and 8 weeks after switching. RESULTS: Eight of the 25 (32 %) "switch" patients dropped out due to psychotic exacerbation during the 8 weeks. In the remaining 17 (68 %) patients, serum prolactin levels were significantly decreased without any significant change in PANSS scores after switching. The 17 patients who completed the switch had previously demonstrated significantly lower positive symptom scores compared to the 8 dropout patients. CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that 71 % of female patients receiving conventional antipsychotic drugs may suffer from hyperprolactinemia and that approximately two-thirds of patients can be switched to quetiapine, resulting in an improvement in hyperprolactinemia. The main characteristic of the switched patients may be fewer positive symptoms.     

Switching to antipsychotic monotherapy can improve attention and processing speed,and social activity in chronic schizophrenia patients

Objective

This study sought to examine whether switching polypharmacy therapy to monotherapy would improve the cognitive function and social function of patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with schizophrenia who were receiving therapy with two antipsychotics were randomly divided into a switch to monotherapy group (switching group) and a polypharmacy continued group (continuing group). For the patients allocated to the switching group, the dose level of one of the two antipsychotic drugs was gradually reduced to zero. Psychotic symptoms, cognitive function and social function scale scores were assessed immediately before and 24 weeks after switching, and the time courses of these scores were compared between the two groups.

Results

Compared with the continuing group, the switching group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in attention after switching (p = 0.02). Furthermore, the improvement in daily living (p = 0.038) and work skills (p = 0.04) was significantly greater in the switching group. In an analysis of the correlation among sub-items with respect to the degrees of improvement, a significant correlation was noted between improvement in executive function and improvement in daily living (r = −0.64, p = 0.005) and between improvement in work skills and improvement in attention (r = −0.51, p = 0.038).

Conclusion

In patients with schizophrenia receiving polypharmacy, switching to monotherapy resulted in improvements in attention. Furthermore, improvements in executive function led to improvements in daily living, and improvements in attention led to improvements in work skills. Thus, switching to monotherapy is a useful option.     

Effects of smoking during antipsychotic withdrawal in patients with chronic schizophrenia

A number of studies have shown that patients with schizophrenia smoke more than other psychiatric patients and more than the general population. Also, medicated schizophrenics who smoke present more positive symptoms of schizophrenia than non-smokers. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of smoking on ratings of psychopathology for 30 days following discontinuation of antipsychotic medication. The subjects were 101 treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia who had been admitted to the inpatient service of Neuroscience Research Hospital (NRH), National Institute of Mental Health, between 1982 and 1994 to undergo studies involving discontinuation of antipsychotic medication. Patients were rated independently on a daily basis on the 22-item Psychiatric Symptom Assessment Scale (PSAS), an extended version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). At baseline, ratings for Verbal Positive, Paranoia and Loss of Function were higher in smokers (n=65) than non-smokers (n=36), but a statistically significant difference was observed only for the Verbal Positive cluster. Analysis by gender revealed that male non-smokers had the lowest psychopathology ratings at baseline. There were no differences in Anxiety/depression, Behavior Positive, Deficit Symptoms or Mannerisms (a measure for abnormal involuntary movements). Following medication discontinuation, repeated-measure analysis demonstrated a 'time' effect for all the variables studied and a 'group' (smokers vs. non-smokers) effect for Verbal Positive, Paranoia, and Loss of Function. Post-hoc comparisons at individual time points showed significantly higher ratings for smokers at week 1 for Paranoia. No differences were observed at later time points. In conclusion, at baseline, smokers had more positive symptoms and were apparently more functionally impaired than non-smokers. This difference was no longer evident after a 30 day medication discontinuation period.     

Use of depot antipsychotic medications for medication nonadherence in schizophrenia

Objectives: To describe factors associated with initiation of depot antipsychotic medications in psychiatric outpatients with schizophrenia and recent medication nonadherence. Methods: A national sample of psychiatrists reported on adult outpatients with schizophrenia who were nonadherent with oral antipsychotic medications in the last year. Results: In total, 17.6% of psychiatrists initiated depot antipsychotic injections. Initiation was significantly and positively associated with public insurance, prior inpatient admission, proportion of time nonadherent, average or above average intellectual functioning, and living in a mental health residence. Use was inversely associated with using second-generation antipsychotics and other oral psychotropic medications prior to medication nonadherence. Psychiatrists who were male, nonwhite, and more optimistic about managing nonadherence were more likely to initiate depot injections. Conclusions: Initiation of depot injections is a joint function of patient, physician, treatment, and setting factors. Use of long-acting preparations in this population is uncommon despite clinical recommendations urging their use.     

Premorbid behavioral and intellectual functioning in schizophrenia patients with poor response to treatment with antipsychotic drugs

INTRODUCTION: Approximately one third of schizophrenia patients show partial or no response to pharmacotherapy. Despite intensive investigations, the phenomenological and biological characteristics of such patients are far from elucidated. This study examined the premorbid behavioral and intellectual functioning of schizophrenia patients who showed poor response to antipsychotic treatment. METHOD: One hundred twenty-nine schizophrenia patients who showed poor response to treatment were ascertained from a national register and matched by gender, age and education to 129 patients who showed adequate response. The groups were compared on premorbid measures of behavioral and intellectual functions. RESULTS: As a group, treatment-resistant male patients had significantly lower (worse) social functioning [p=0.002], and individual autonomy [p<0.0001] scores before the onset of the illness compared to treatment non-resistant patients. Male and female treatment-resistant patients did not differ from non-resistant patients in premorbid intellectual functioning [p>0.1]. CONCLUSIONS: Low premorbid social functioning and individual autonomy, but not intellectual functioning, could serve as predictors of poor treatment response in schizophrenia.     

Sleep in schizophrenia patients and the effects of antipsychotic drugs

Insomnia is a common feature in schizophrenia. However, it seldom is the predominant complaint. Nevertheless, severe insomnia is often seen during exacerbations of schizophrenia, and may actually precede the appearance of other symptoms of relapse. The sleep disturbances of either never-medicated or previously treated schizophrenia patients are characterized by a sleep-onset and maintenance insomnia. In addition, stage 4 sleep, slow wave sleep (stages 3 and 4), non-REM (NREM) sleep in minutes and REM latency are decreased. The atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, risperidone, and clozapine significantly increase total sleep time and stage 2 sleep. Moreover, olanzapine and risperidone enhance slow wave sleep. On the other hand, the typical antipsychotics haloperidol, thiothixene, and flupentixol significantly reduce stage 2 sleep latency and increase sleep efficiency. Future research should address: (1) the sleep patterns in subtypes of schizophrenia patients; (2) the role of neurotransmitters other than dopamine in the disruption of sleep in schizophrenia; (3) the functional alterations in CNS areas related to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia during NREM sleep and REM sleep (brain imaging studies); (4) the short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term effects of atypical antisychotics on sleep variables.     

Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment

OBJECTIVE: When a schizophrenia patient has an inadequate response to treatment with an antipsychotic drug, it is unclear what other antipsychotic to switch to and when to use clozapine. In this study, the authors compared switching to clozapine with switching to another atypical antipsychotic in patients who had discontinued treatment with a newer atypical antipsychotic in the context of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Interventions Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation. METHOD: Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone in phase 1 or 1B of the trials, primarily because of inadequate efficacy, were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (N=49) or blinded treatment with another newer atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [N=19], quetiapine [N=15], or risperidone [N=16]). RESULTS: Time until treatment discontinuation for any reason was significantly longer for clozapine (median=10.5 months) than for quetiapine (median=3.3), or risperidone (median=2.8), but not for olanzapine (median=2.7). Time to discontinuation because of inadequate therapeutic effect was significantly longer for clozapine than for olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. At 3-month assessments, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores had decreased more in patients treated with clozapine than in patients treated with quetiapine or risperidone but not olanzapine. One patient treated with clozapine developed agranulocytosis, and another developed eosinophilia; both required treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: For these patients with schizophrenia who prospectively failed to improve with an atypical antipsychotic, clozapine was more effective than switching to another newer atypical antipsychotic. Safety monitoring is necessary to detect and manage clozapine's serious side effects.