Angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in a low-risk European population for coronary artery disease

An insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) has been associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI). However, this finding has not been fully investigated in European populations with very low CAD risk. In a case-control study on a population from Southern Europe (Toulouse, France), we evaluated the ACE I/D polymorphism in 405 men, aged 35–65 years, who underwent coronary angiography and in 357 representative control men within the same age range. We also explored associations in the patients between this polymorphism and CAD severity. The ACE genotype was not associated with the presence of either CAD or MI. The ACE genotype was not a marker for angiographically assessed CAD severity. In a sample in one of the European populations with the lowest CAD risk, ACE I/D polymorphism was not associated with an increased risk for CAD or MI and did not influence the extent of CAD.     

Predictors of restenosis after coronary artery stenting

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention, factors related to restenosis after coronary artery stenting and the degree of the risk of restenosis were evaluated. METHODS: The study enrolled 181 patients (249 lesions) who underwent the first coronary artery stenting. Multivariate analysis was performed, and the restenotic index (RI) was calculated by combining the extracted predictors. RESULTS: Among the 181 patients (249 lesions), restenosis occurred in 89 (111 lesions) and did not occur in 92 (138 lesions). Vascular revasculation was performed in 95 restenosed target lesions in 68 patients. The mean period of follow-up angiography after the procedures was 206 days in the restenosis group and 271 days in the non-restenosis group, i.e. significantly shorter in the restenosis group. As a result of multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus, Cr level, amount of the contrast medium used and stent diameter were selected as significant factors that independently contributed to the restenosis after coronary artery stenting. By combining these factors, the RI was calculated by the following formula for the prediction of restenosis: RI=exp (1.088xCr+0.909xdiabetes mellitus+0.871xcontrast medium+0.591xstent diameter). CONCLUSION: The risk of restenosis after coronary artery stenting can be predicted to an extent according to the RI devised in this study.     

Gender and restenosis after coronary artery stenting.

AIMS: To examine the impact of sex on restenosis in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing coronary stenting and systematic angiographic and clinical follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study includes a cohort of 4374 consecutive patients (1025 women and 3349 men), undergoing coronary stenting for stable or unstable angina. Follow-up angiography at 6 months was performed in 80% of patients. Clinical events were assessed for a period of 1 year after the procedure. Main end-points of the study were angiographic and clinical restenosis at follow-up. Compared to men, women were older, presented more often with diabetes, smaller vessel size and shorter lesions. Clinical restenosis (need for reintervention) was found in 14.8% of women and 17.5% of men (P=0.048). The incidence of angiographic restenosis was significantly lower in women then in men (28.9% vs 33.9%, respectively, P=0.01). After adjustment for other covariates, women presented a 23% reduction of the risk of restenosis: odds ratio 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.93). While a small vessel size was a risk factor for restenosis in both sexes, the influence of diabetes on restenosis was mostly confined to women. CONCLUSION: Compared with men, women present a lower risk of restenosis after coronary stenting despite a more preponderant presence of two major risk factors for restenosis, diabetes and small vessel size. There are sex-based differences in predictive factors of restenosis with diabetes having a particularly strong impact in women.     

The DD genotype of angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphism is a risk factor for coronary artery disease and coronary stent restenosis in Japanese patients

Stent implantation has decreased the incidence of restenosis after coronary intervention, but has not eliminated it. The contribution of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotype to the development of coronary artery disease and restenosis after coronary stenting was investigated in 67 Japanese patients in whom 103 lesions in which stents had been successfully implanted were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, before, immediately after coronary stenting, and during follow-up. The distribution of the patients with the DD, ID, and II genotypes was 13%, 54%, and 33%, respectively. The prevalence of multivessel disease in the DD genotype was significantly higher (DD genotype: 78%; ID genotype: 58%; II genotype: 27%, chi2=8.13, p=0.016) and the late loss in the DD genotype (1.43+/-0.96 mm) was significantly greater (ID genotype: 0.78+/-0.98 mm and II genotype: 0.79+/-0.88 mm, p<0.05 vs DD genotype). However, there was no significant difference in the restenosis rate among the 3 genotypes. The present study in Japanese patients indicates that the DD genotype is associated with more extensive coronary artery disease and progression of the inward remodeling within the stented lesion, which is primarily caused by neointimal hyperplasia.     

Quinapril prevents restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme D allele.

Restenosis after coronary artery stent implantation is attributed chiefly to intimal hyperplasia, which is prevented experimentally by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Therefore, the present study investigated whether the effect of quinapril, a tissue-specific ACE inhibitor, on the prevention of coronary restenosis differs according to ACE polymorphism. One hundred consecutive patients with successful stent implantation were randomly assigned to quinapril and control groups. Both follow-up angiography and ACE polymorphism analysis were obtained from 92 patients (control, 46; quinapril treatment, 46). The prevalence of risk factors did not differ statistically according to quinapril treatment or ACE genotypes. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of restenosis 6 months after stenting between the groups. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed that quinapril treatment resulted in significantly higher minimal lumen diameter and significantly lower percent diameter stenosis (22.9 +/- 22.6 vs 37.1 +/- 19.7% in the control group, p < 0.05) in patients with the D allele although there was no difference in those with the II genotype. In addition, intravascular ultrasound revealed that quinapril treatment significantly prevented the loss of minimal lumen cross-sectional area and the increase in percent area stenosis (34.5 +/- 14.0 vs 53.3 +/- 16.4% in the control group, p < 0.05) in patients with the D allele compared to those with the II genotype. These results suggest that the administration of ACE inhibitors for the attenuation of lumen loss after coronary stent implantation is best for subjects with the D allele of the ACE genotype.     

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on restenosis after coronary stenting

The Plasma level of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has been identified as a major risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent implantation in selected patients; ACE inhibition may therefore contribute to prevent its occurrence. The effect of oral ACE inhibition at conventional doses was analyzed retrospectively in a series of 897 patients with ischemia who received >or=1 coronary stent on 998 lesions and underwent angiographic follow-up; no exclusion criteria were introduced in this analysis. The restenosis rate in 282 patients (31.4%) taking ACE inhibitors was 36.6% compared with 22.9% in 615 non-ACE-inhibited patients (p = 0.00001, odds ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 2.59), and the late loss in minimum lumen diameter was 1.25 +/- 0.8 versus 0.96 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively (p = 0.0001). During univariate analysis, a negative effect of the drug on restenosis was observed in all subgroups of patients (i.e., hypertensives, diabetics, women, and patients with previous myocardial infarction). Similar effects were observed independently of the ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism. During multivariate analysis, ACE inhibition was confirmed as an independent risk factor for restenosis (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.51, p = 0.0001). Other predictors were the implantation of multiple stents (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.64, p <0.0001), diabetes (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.41, p <0.0001), and vessel reference diameter before angioplasty (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.69, p <0.0001). Although unexplained and apparently contradictory, our data suggest that the use of conventional oral doses of ACE inhibitors in a "real-world" population who underwent coronary stent implantation increases the incidence of in-stent restenosis. Such a finding does not negate the known clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors, but it may deserve attention when a patient treated with ACE inhibitors becomes a candidate for stent implantation.     

Effect of cilostazol on restenosis after coronary angioplasty and stenting in comparison to conventional coronary artery stenting with ticlopidine

BACKGROUND: The role of antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine plus aspirin in the prevention of subacute thrombosis after coronary artery stenting has been established. However, restenosis remains a major limitation in coronary artery stenting. METHODS: To compare the effect of cilostazol on restenosis after coronary angioplasty and stenting with that of ticlopidine after coronary artery stenting, 213 patients with 230 lesions who underwent successful coronary interventions were evaluated. Optimal results (residual stenosis less than 30%) were obtained by balloon angioplasty in 112 lesions, 64 lesions were treated with aspirin 81 mg/day (balloon-aspirin group) and 48 lesions with cilostazol 200 mg/day and aspirin 81 mg/day (balloon-cilostazol group). Stent implantation was performed in the remaining 118 lesions; 55 lesions were treated with ticlopidine 200 mg/day and aspirin 243 mg/day (stent-ticlopidine group) and 63 lesions with cilostazol 200 mg/day and aspirin 81 mg/day (stent-cilostazol group). Concomitant medications were continued for 4 to 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: No adverse events including acute occlusion and subacute thrombosis occurred in any groups. Although immediate gain and minimal lumen diameter immediately after angioplasty were significantly larger in stent groups than those in balloon groups, net gain at follow-up was significantly larger in cilostazol groups (1.54+/-0.83 mm in balloon-cilostazol group and 1.65+/-0.78 mm in stent-cilostazol group) than other groups (1.02+/-0.81 mm in balloon-aspirin group and 1.21+/-0.70 in stent-ticlopidine group) as a result of significantly lower late loss and loss index in cilostazol groups. The restenosis rate was significantly lower in cilostazol groups (12.5% in balloon-cilostazol group and 14.3% in stent-cilostazol group) than other groups (43.8% in balloon-aspirin group and 32.7% in stent-ticlopidine group). The rate of recurrent angina was significantly lower in cilostazol groups (4.3% in balloon-cilostazol group and 1.9% in stent-cilostazol group) than in other groups (17.5% in balloon-aspirin group and 14.0% in stent-ticlopidine groups). CONCLUSIONS: Both optimal balloon angioplasty with cilostazol and coronary artery stenting with cilostazol have a potential to reduce restenosis compared with optimal balloon angioplasty with aspirin or conventional coronary artery stenting with ticlopidine plus aspirin.     

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and cardiac mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate whether the insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene is associated with mortality and cardiac morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: The ACE I/D genotype was determined in 249 consecutive patients who underwent CABG. Follow-up information (after 2 years) was obtained in 247 patients (99.2%). The primary end point was total mortality; the secondary end point was mortality from cardiac reasons, or the need for myocardial revascularization (coronary angioplasty or recurrent CABG) during follow-up. At follow-up, total mortality was 9.7% (all patients). None of the 51 patients with the ACE II genotype, 14 of 125 patients with the ACE ID genotype (11.2%), and 10 of 71 with the ACE DD genotype (14.1%) died during follow-up (p < 0.05). The ACE DD genotype, older age, diabetes mellitus, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, and lack of internal mammary artery graft were independently related to an increased mortality after CABG. The incidence of the secondary end point was 14.5% (all patients): ACE II, 5.8%; ACE ID, 9.4%; ACE DD, 30.3% (p < 0.05). The ACE DD genotype and the presence of a left main coronary artery stenosis >or= 50% were independent predictors for the secondary end point. CONCLUSION: The ACE DD genotype is associated with increased midterm mortality and cardiac morbidity after CABG.     

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism, coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. An angiographically controlled study.

Objectives: We investigated the association between insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene, the presence and extent of coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction. Background: The D allele of the ACE gene has been associated with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction, but this association has been challenged in epidemiological studies. Methods: Nine hundred and sixty-nine men and 341 women undergoing coronary angiography were studied. The ACE genotypes were assessed by polymerase chain reaction from genomic deoxyribonucleic acid, homozygosity for the D allele was controlled using an insertion-specific primer. Coronary artery disease was defined by angiographic criteria, the extent of coronary artery disease by the number of coronary arteries with >/=50% lumen narrowing. Results: The ACE genotypes did not differ in terms of age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure, plasma lipids or lipoproteins. We found no association between the ACE genotypes and coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval in DD genotypes for coronary artery disease in men 0.97, 0.70-1.36; in women 1.56, 0.95-2.57), extent of coronary artery disease (men 1.17, 0.85-1.61; women 1.24, 0.65-2.34), or myocardial infarction among the patients with coronary artery disease (men 1.07, 0.78-1.48; women 0.95, 0.50-1.76). The ACE genotype was not associated with coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction in hypertensives (n=771; odds ratio for coronary artery disease 0.93, 0.65-1.34; odds ratio for myocardial infarction 0.94, 0.66-1.33), or in patients 相似文献   

Lower mortality in patients with the DD genotype of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism has been associated with different serum ACE concentrations and cardiac ACE activity. We assessed whether the ACE gene I/D polymorphism influenced cardiac mortality in Japanese patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ACE gene I/D polymorphism was determined in 441 consecutive patients with a first myocardial infarction.There were 69 patients (16%) with the DD genotype, 194 patients (44%) with the ID genotype, and 178 patients (40%) with the II genotype. During a mean follow-up of 9.4 months, there were 49 cardiac deaths (DD, n = 4; ID, n = 26; II, n = 19).The DD genotype was significantly associated with a lower mortality than the other genotypes (p = 0.0363) by Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, site of myocardial infarction, Killip functional class, reperfusion therapy during acute phase, ACE inhibitor use, and beta-blocker use. CONCLUSIONS: In a selected cohort of Japanese patients, the DD genotype was associated with a significantly lower cardiac mortality after a first myocardial infarction.     

Failure of aldosterone suppression despite angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor administration in chronic heart failure is associated with ACE DD genotype

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess whether the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism influences the adequacy of the neurohormonal response to ACE inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of CHF, and aldosterone levels closely relate to outcome in patients with CHF. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors suppress the RAAS, but a significant proportion of patients exhibit elevated serum levels of aldosterone despite long-term administration of apparently adequate doses of these agents. METHODS: We prospectively studied 132 patients with CHF (ejection fraction <45%) receiving long-term therapy with ACE inhibitors for over six months. Patients taking aldosterone antagonists were excluded from the study. "Aldosterone escape" was defined as being present when plasma aldosterone levels were above the normal range in our laboratory (>42 nmol/L). Patients were then divided into two subgroups according to the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of aldosterone escape. Genotype analysis for the ACE I/D polymorphism was performed by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The prevalence of aldosterone escape in our patients was 10% (13/132). The two groups of patients did not differ regarding the dose of ACE inhibitor, diuretics and their renal function. There was a statistically significant different distribution of genotypes between the two groups, with a higher proportion of DD genotype in group 1 compared with group 2 (62% vs. 24%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CHF with aldosterone escape have a higher prevalence of DD genotype compared with patients with aldosterone within the normal limits. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism contributes to the modulation and adequacy of the neurohormonal response to long-term ACE-inhibitor administration in CHF.     

Mechanism of coronary artery restenosis after stenting for acute myocardial infarction

In this intravascular ultrasound study, the mechanism of restenosis after stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was investigated in 33 patients 6 months after primary coronary intervention for AMI. Restenosis after stenting for AMI was primarily caused by stent underexpansion, not by neointima formation.     

The relationship between angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism, coronary artery disease, and stent restenosis: the role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have advanced atherosclerosis compared with nondiabetics. Restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation occurs frequently in diabetic patients. Angiotensin II is an important growth factor for the development of neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationships between angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and coronary artery disease (CAD) and stent restonosis in diabetic patients. One hundred and thirty consecutive patients with CAD and 47 consecutive patients (14 males, mean age, 58.0 +/- 10.0) without CAD were enrolled in the study. All patients had type 2 (noninsulin dependent) DM. The patients with CAD underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stenting. Ninety-four (59 males, mean age, 60.3 +/- 9.8) underwent control coronary angiography at the end of the follow-up period (mean duration, 9.1 +/- 2.9 months). ACE gene I/D genotyping was identified in all patients. No significant difference was found among patients with and without CAD with respect to ACE gene I/D polymorphism (P = 0.460). In the control coronary angiography, stent restenosis and new lesion development were comparable in each genotyping subgroup. However, a significant relationship was observed between restenosis and the use of ACE inhibitors (ACEI) in patients with D allele (ACEI ratio, 43.5% in the restenosis group and 56.5% in non-restenotic group, P < 0.05). We did not find any relationship between ACE gene I/D polymorphism and CAD and stent restenosis and new lesion development in diabetic patients. On the other hand, ACEI treatment may reduce stent restenosis in type 2 diabetic patients with D allele (DD or ID).     

Relation between the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin I converting enzyme gene and restenosis after coronary stenting

BACKGROUND: Observations with intravascular ultrasound demonstrated that neointimal hyperplasia is the predominant factor responsible for in-stent restenosis. Experimental data suggest that angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) plays a role in the thickening of neointima after balloon denudation. Insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene is significantly associated with plasma level of ACE and subjects with D/D genotype have significantly higher plasma levels of ACE than normal. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether this polymorphism influences the risk of restenosis after coronary stenting. METHODS: We genotyped 158 patients who had undergone single-vessel coronary stenting for the ACE I/D polymorphism. RESULTS: Of the 158 patients, 56 (35%) had the D/D genotype, 71 (45%) had the I/D genotype and 31 (20%) had the I/I genotype. Prevalences of genotypes were compatible with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and distributions of ACE genotype among patients and 132 healthy controls from the same geographic area did not differ. At follow-up (after a median duration of 5.4 months), overall rates of angiographic restenosis and of revascularization of target lesion (RTL) were 32.3 and 22.8%, respectively. Of 51 patients with angiographic restenosis, 31 (60.8%) had focal and 20 (39.2%) had diffuse patterns of restenosis. Diffuse in-stent restenosis was significantly more prevalent among patients with D/D genotype (P = 0.016). Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis identified ACE I/D polymorphism as the independent predictor of angiographic restenosis and RTL. Relative risk of angiographic restenosis was 6.29 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.80-22.05, P = 0.0004] for D/D genotype and 3.88 (95% CI 1.11-13.12, P = 0.029) for I/D genotype, whereas relative risk of RTL was 7.44 (95% CI 1.60-34.58, P = 0.01) for D/D genotype and 3.88 (95% CI 0.083-18.15, P = 0.085) for I/D genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The ACE I/D polymorphism is significantly associated with risk of angiographic and clinical restenosis after coronary stenting. Angiographic pattern of restenosis is also significantly associated with I/D polymorphism, diffuse type being more prevalent among subjects with D/D genotype.