Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation for adult recipients with irreversible end-stage renal disease

HYPOTHESIS: Combined liver-kidney transplantation is safe (low morbidity and acceptable mortality) and effective in patients with end-stage liver disease. Although refinements in surgical technique have resulted in better patient and allograft outcomes, the negative impact of renal insufficiency on survival in patients undergoing liver transplantation has been widely reported, although some aspects are controversial. DESIGN: Analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcome in the management of patients undergoing combined liver-kidney transplantation. The end points were operative mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival. SETTING: University Hospital 12 de Octubre. PATIENTS: Between May 1986 and December 2001, 820 liver transplantations were performed. There were 16 cases (1.96%) of combined liver-kidney transplantations, which represent the sample of this study. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD follow-up of 42.2 +/- 29 months: 6 patients died (37.5% mortality rate). There were 4 (25%) hospital deaths within 6 months following surgery and 2 after 6 months (4 sepsis, 1 refractory heart failure, and 1 recurrent hepatitis C virus disease). Univariate analysis related to mortality included age, sex, etiology, preoperative creatinine level, United Network for Organ Sharing status, Child-Pugh score, type of hepatectomy (piggyback), intraoperative blood product administration, and the presence of postoperative complications. The only 2 significant factors were the presence of postoperative complications (P = .01) and the United Network for Organ Sharing status (P = .02). Crude survival rate was 62.5%. Actuarial survival rates were 80%, 71%, and 60% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Because end-stage renal disease is not a formal contraindication for liver transplantation, a combined liver-kidney transplantation for adults with end-stage renal disease can be done safely and effectively.     

Impact of donor, technical, and recipient risk factors on survival and quality of life after liver transplantation

HYPOTHESIS: Donor, technical, and recipient risk factors cumulatively impact survival and health-related quality of life after liver transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A total of 483 adults undergoing primary orthotopic liver transplantation between January 1, 1991, and July 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft and patient survival, Karnofsky functional performance scores, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Survey scores, and Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale scores as influenced by potential risk factors including donor age, weight, warm ischemia time, cold ischemia time (CIT), sex, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status (1 or 2A vs 2B or 3), recipient age and disease, bilirubin level, and creatinine level. RESULTS: Five-year graft survival was 72% for recipients of donors younger than 60 years and 35% for recipients of donors 60 years and older (P<.001). A CIT of 12 hours or more was associated with shorter 5-year graft survival (71% vs 58%; P = .004). Five-year graft survival for UNOS status 2B or 3 was 71% vs 60% for status 1 or 2A (P = .02). A comparable pattern was seen for patient survival in relation to donor age (P = .003), CIT (P = .005), and urgency status (P = .03). Urgent UNOS status, advanced donor age, and prolonged CIT were independently associated with shorter graft and patient survival (P<.05). Functional performance and health-related quality of life were not affected by donor, recipient, or technical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Combining advanced donor age, urgent status, and prolonged CIT adversely affects graft and patient survival, and the cumulative effects of these risk factors can be modeled to predict posttransplant survival.     

Long-term outcome of pediatric liver transplantation for biliary atresia: a 10-year follow-up in a single center.

The aim of this study was to review our experience in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for biliary atresia (BA) in children and analyze the survival and prognostic factors, and long-term outcome. We reviewed 332 OLTs performed in 280 children between the years 1986 and 2000. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed on patient and graft survivals according to recipients' and donors' characteristics as well as intraoperative data. The long-term outcome among the 80 children living at 10 years after OLT was studied according to growth, immunosuppressive therapy, and liver and renal functions. Liver graft status was eventually documented by liver biopsy. Status of rehabilitation was assessed by reviewing school performance and employment. Overall patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85, 82, and 82%, respectively, and the corresponding overall graft survival rates were 77, 73, and 71%. In the multivariate analysis, we identified 4 independent prognostic factors: polysplenia syndrome (P = .03), United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status (P = .05), donor's age (P = .01), and perioperative surgical complications (P = .03). At 10 years after transplant, 80 children were alive and had normal growth rates. Liver histology was abnormal in 73% of these long-term survivors, mainly due to chronic rejection and centrilobular fibrosis. A total of 63 of the 80 children attended normal school and in 55 children (69%) school performance was not delayed. In conclusion, we discovered that a good long-term survival could be achieved after liver transplantation for BA, with a 82% survival rate at 10 years with normal scholastic studies in the majority of recipients.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting in non-dialysis-dependent mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction

OBJECTIVES: The effect of mild-to-moderate elevation of preoperative serum creatinine levels on morbidity and mortality from coronary artery bypass grafting has not been investigated in a large multivariable model incorporating preoperative and intraoperative variables. Our first objective was to ascertain the effect of a mild-to-moderate elevation in the preoperative serum creatinine level on the need for mechanical renal support; the duration of special care and total postoperative stay; the occurrence of infective, respiratory, and neurologic complications; and hospital mortality. Our second objective was to ascertain which patient variables contributed to an increase in the serum creatinine level in association with coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: A total of 1427 patients who had no known pre-existing renal disease and who were undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were recruited for the study. Patients were divided, on the basis of preoperative serum creatinine level, into 3 groups as follows: creatinine level of less than 130 micromol. L(-1); creatinine level of 130 to 149 micromol. L(-1); and creatinine level of 150 micromol. L(-1) or greater. A multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis was used, and variables significant at the 5% level were included when developing the final multivariable models. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed that elevation of the preoperative serum creatinine level to 130 micromol. L(-1) or greater increased the likelihood of needing mechanical renal support postoperatively (P <.001), as well as the need for postoperative special care (P <.001) and total hospital stay (P <.001). In-hospital mortality was also significantly elevated as the preoperative creatinine level rose to 130 to 149 micromol. L(-1) (P =.045) and to 150 micromol. L(-1) or greater (P <.001). It was further observed that patients with preoperative serum creatinine levels of 130 to 149 micromol. L(-1) (P =.02), patients with preoperative serum creatinine levels of 150 micromol. L(-1) or greater (P =.001), hypertensive patients (P =.007), patients with angina of New York Heart Association class III or greater (P =.001), patients having a nonelective operation (P =.002), and patients having a prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P =.008) had a significantly greater increase in the serum creatinine level as a result of coronary artery bypass grafting. Of particular note was the finding that the method of myocardial protection (cardioplegia or crossclamp fibrillation) did not significantly influence in-hospital mortality, need for mechanical renal support, or special care or total postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: A mild elevation (130-149 micromol. L(-1)) in the preoperative serum creatinine level significantly increases the need for mechanical renal support, the duration of special care and total postoperative stay, and the in-hospital mortality. As the preoperative serum creatinine level increases further (> or =150 micromol. L(-1)), this effect is more pronounced. No significant difference in outcome was observed between the use of cardioplegia or crossclamp fibrillation for myocardial protection.     

Ascites after liver transplantation--a mystery.

Ascites after liver transplantation, although uncommon, presents a serious clinical dilemma. The hemodynamic changes that support the development of ascites before liver transplantation are resolved after transplant; therefore, persistent ascites (PA) after liver transplantation is unexpected and poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to define the clinical factors associated with PA after liver transplantation. This was a retrospective case-control analysis of patients who underwent liver transplantation at the University of Pennsylvania. PA occurring for more than 3 months after liver transplantation was confirmed by imaging studies. PA was correlated with multiple recipient and donor variables, including etiology of liver disease, preoperative ascites, prior portosystemic shunt (PS), donor age, and cold ischemic (CI) time. There were 2 groups: group 1, cases with PA transplanted from November 1990 to July 2001, and group 2, consecutive, control subjects who underwent liver transplantation between September 1999 and December 2001. Both groups were followed to censoring, May 2002, or death. Twenty-five from group 1 had ascites after liver transplantation after a median follow-up of 2.6 years. In group 1 vs group 2 (n = 106), there was a male predominance 80% vs 61% (P =.10) with similar age 52 years; chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) was diagnosed in 88% vs 44% (P <.0001); preoperative ascites and ascites refractory to treatment were more prevalent in group 1 (P =.0004 and P =.02, respectively), and CI was higher in group 1, (8.5 hours vs 6.3 hours, P =.002). Eight of the 25 (group 1) had portal hypertension with median portosystemic gradient 16.5 mm Hg (range, 16-24). PS was performed in 7 of 25 cases, which resulted in partial resolution of ascites. The development of PA after liver transplantation is multifactorial; HCV, refractory ascites before liver transplantation, and prolonged CI contribute to PA after liver transplantation.     

Recipient survival and graft survival are not diminished by simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: an analysis of the united network for organ sharing database

Recipients of solitary liver and kidney transplants are living longer, and this increases their risk of long-term complications such as recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) and drug-induced nephrotoxicity. These complications may require retransplantation. Since the adoption of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, the number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK) procedures has increased. However, there are no standardized criteria for organ allocation to SLK candidates. The aims of this study were to retrospectively compare recipient and graft survival with liver transplantation alone (LTA), SLK, kidney after liver transplantation (KALT), and liver after kidney transplantation (LAKT) and to identify independent risk factors affecting recipient and graft survival. The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (1988-2007) was queried for adult LTA (66,026), SLK (2327), KALT (1738), and LAKT procedures (242). After adjustments for potential confounding demographic and clinical variables, there was no difference in recipient mortality rates with LTA and SLK (P = 0.02). However, there was a 15% decreased risk of graft loss with SLK versus LTA (hazard ratio = 0.85, P < 0.001). The recipient and graft survival rates with SLK were higher than the rates with both KALT (P <0.001 and P <0.001) and LAKT (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001). The following were all identified as independent negative predictors of recipient mortality and graft loss: recipient age ≥ 65 years, male sex, black race, HCV/diabetes mellitus status, donor age ≥ 60 years, serum creatinine level ≥2.0 mg/dL, cold ischemia time > 12 hours, and warm ischemia time > 60 minutes. Although the recent increase in the number of SLK procedures performed each year has effectively decreased the number of potential donor kidneys available to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) awaiting kidney transplantation, SLK in patients with end-stage liver disease and ESRD is justified because of the lower risk of graft loss with SLK versus LTA as well as the superior recipient and graft survival with SLK versus serial liver-kidney transplantation.     

心脏死亡器官捐献肝移植术后并发急性肾损伤危险因素分析

目的探讨心脏死亡器官捐献(DCD)肝移植术后并发急性肾损伤(AKI)的危险因素。 方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2018年11月宁波市医疗中心李惠利医院肝胆胰外科159例DCD肝移植受者临床资料,根据改善全球肾脏病预后组织临床实践指南中AKI诊断标准将159例受者分为AKI组(34例)和对照组(125例)。采用两独立样本t检验比较两组受者年龄和术前血清白蛋白。采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验比较两组受者术前终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、术前体质指数(BMI)、供肝冷/热缺血时间、术中输液量、术中出血量、术中输血量、术中尿量、手术时间、术中去甲肾上腺素总用量及总住院天数。采用卡方检验比较两组受者性别、术前乙型肝炎、术中低血压、术后感染、肝移植术式及术后再次手术情况。将单因素分析中有统计学差异的变量纳入Logistic回归进行多因素分析。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果肝移植术后AKI发生率为21.4%(34/159)。单因素分析结果表明,AKI组与对照组受者术前MELD评分、术前血清白蛋白、术中输液量、术中出血量、术中尿量、手术时间、术中低血压及术后再次手术差异均有统计学意义(Z＝2.763, t＝－2.250, Z＝2.040, Z＝2.092, Z＝－3.303, Z＝－2.170, χ²＝8.227, χ²＝5.294, P均<0.05)。Logistic回归多因素分析结果显示：术前MELD评分、术前血清白蛋白、术中尿量和手术时间是DCD肝移植术后并发AKI的独立危险因素,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。 结论DCD肝移植术前应改善受者一般情况,提高围手术期营养水平,术中控制液体出入量,合理使用利尿剂和缩短手术时间,以降低受者术后AKI发生率。     

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma validation of present selection criteria in predicting outcome.

Appropriate patient selection is crucial in ensuring acceptable outcomes from orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) has elected to prioritize HCC patients for OLT based on criteria of tumor burden. However, it is unclear whether these criteria correlate with outcome, or with the pathobiological features associated with tumor recurrence. Therefore, we analyzed 109 consecutive patients undergoing OLT for HCC at our center, to determine the utility of present selection criteria in predicting outcome. Pathologic tumor staging of the explanted liver was based on the American Tumor Study Group modified tumor node metastases (pTNM) classification system. Multifocality was defined as >4 tumor nodules on explant. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods. At a median follow-up of 18.9 months, the overall mortality was 19% with 15 patients (14%) dying of recurrent HCC. Kaplan-Meier 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates were 89.5%, 68%, and 65%, respectively. Recurrence-free rates of 1, 3, and 5 years were 89%, 75%, and 65%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the factors found to be significantly associated with recurrence of HCC were explant features of macrovascular invasion, tumor size (per centimeter increase), pTNM stage (per 1-stage increase), and pre-transplant serum alphafetoprotein (AFP) >300 ng/mL. In defining a threshold level, we found that explant tumor diameter > or =3 cm, and those tumors classified as at least pT3 on pathological examination, were significantly associated with recurrence (P =.01 and.03, respectively). Tumor size on explant was found to be strongly correlated with multifocality (P =.017) and vascular invasion (P =.02). Patients exceeding pathological UNOS criteria were 3.1 times more likely to have recurrence of HCC (P =.03). In conclusion, we found that tumor size appears to be a surrogate marker for negative pathobiological predictors of outcome, i.e., vascular invasion and multifocality. Present UNOS selection criteria for HCC based on tumor burden appear to provide adequate discriminatory power in predicting outcome of OLT.     

Diabetes and evidence of atherosclerosis are major risk factors for adverse outcome after elective thoracic aortic surgery

BACKGROUND: To predict risk after elective repair of ascending aorta and aortic arch aneurysms, we studied 464 consecutive patients. METHODS: Adverse outcome (stroke or hospital death) was analyzed in 372 patients who underwent proximal repair and 92 patients who underwent aortic arch replacement from 1986 to the present. Preoperative risk factors with a P value less than.2 in a univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate model, and an equation incorporating independent risk factors was derived separately for proximal aorta and arch surgery. RESULTS: Age more than 65 years (P =.04), diabetes (P =.02), cause (P =.01), and prolonged total cerebral protection time (duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion, P =.001) were significant univariate risk factors for elective proximal aortic repair. Diabetes (P =.005, odds ratio 5.1), atherosclerosis (P =.003, odds ratio 4.0), and dissection (P =.048, odds ratio 2.5) were independent factors. For elective arch surgery, female sex (P =.07), age more than 65 years (P =.04), coronary artery disease (P =.02), diabetes (P =.06), cause (P =.07), and prolonged total cerebral protection time (P =.025) were univariate risk factors. Female sex (P =.05, odds ratio 4.7), coronary artery disease (P =.02, odds ratio 6.5), diabetes (P =.13, odds ratio 4.0), and total cerebral protection time (P =.03, odds ratio 1.02/min) were independent factors. To calculate risk of adverse outcome (P), enter 1 if factor is present, 0 if absent, and estimate total cerebral protection time (in minutes). [equation: see text]. CONCLUSION: In this large series of patients, the presence of diabetes and manifestations of atherosclerosis emerge as extremely important risk factors for adverse outcome after ascending aorta or arch surgery, displacing age. Multivariate equations derived from these data allow more precise calculation of risk for each individual contemplating elective surgery.     

Outcome of right hepatectomies in patients older than 70 years

HYPOTHESIS: The increasing number of elderly patients undergoing liver resections mandates updating of clinical outcomes on this specific population. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients older than 70 years who underwent right hepatectomies (including 7 extended right hepatectomies) between January 1, 1995, and October 31, 2001 (group 1) and 99 patients younger than 70 years who underwent 64 right hepatectomies and 35 extended right hepatectomies during the same period (group 2) were included for a total sample population of 122. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative clinicopathological features, intraoperative factors, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, intensive care unit requirement, hospital stay, and course of main biochemical liver function test results of groups 1 and 2 were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar for indications for surgery and the presence of underlying liver disease. Group 1 had a higher incidence of associated pulmonary diseases (21.7% vs 5%, P =.02) and patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III (ie, a patient with severe systemic disease limiting activity, but not incapacitating) (56.5% vs 26.3% of cases, P =.01). There were no differences in intraoperative requirement of packed red blood cells and in operation time. There were no in-hospital deaths in group 1; there were 2 deaths (2%) in group 2. Nine patients (39.1%) in group 1 and 32 patients (32.3%) in group 2 experienced postoperative complications (P =.53), of whom, respectively, 5 (21.7%) and 17 (17.2%) developed transient liver dysfunction (P =.56), and 4 (17.4%) and 5 (5.1%) required a supplementary intesive care unit stay (P =.06). The postoperative stay (mean [SD], 16 [14] days vs 13 [9] days, P =.88) and peak values of the aminotransferase level, total serum bilirubin level, and prothrombin time were similar in the 2 groups. The timing of the peak value of the total serum bilirubin level (mean [SD], 4.1 [4.8] days vs 2.5 [2.5] days, P =.28) and its period of normalization (mean [SD], 9.4 [10.8] days vs 6.7 [5.1] days, P =.67) were also similar for both groups. For patients with malignancies, the 3-year survival rate was 64.2% in group 1 and 53.9% in group 2 (P =.53). CONCLUSION: Being older than 70 years should not be a contraindication for major hepatectomies, provided that liver cirrhosis and severe associated medical conditions are ruled out during the preoperative evaluation.     

Chronic renal dysfunction after liver transplantation in adult patients: prevalence,risk factors,and impact on mortality

INTRODUCTION: Although chronic renal dysfunction (CRD) is a common complication among patients undergoing liver transplantation (OLT) its prevalence, risk factors, and impact on outcome have not been well defined. We aimed to assess the incidence of CRD, its associated risk factors and its impact on outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cohort of 289 consecutive adult first liver transplant patients with posttransplant follow-up longer than 6 months received cyclosporine in 230 patients (153 oil-based and 81 microemulsion formulation), tacrolimus in 55. CRD was defined as serum creatinine levels greater than 1.3 mg/dL for more than 6 months. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 67 months, 138 patients (47.8%) displayed CRD. The prevalence of CRD was 30.9%, 41.5%, and 38.9% at 1, 5, and 13 years after OLT, respectively. Twelve patients (4.1%) developed end-stage renal failure. Male gender, older recipient age, pretransplant renal dysfunction and hyperuricemia, posttransplant in-hospital renal dysfunction and hyperuricemia, and renal dysfunction during the first 6 months after OLT were each significantly associated with the development of CRD. Survival was significantly lower (63%) among liver transplant patients with CRD than those without this complication (71%, P=.024). CONCLUSIONS: CRD is an important cause of morbidity after OLT, although end-stage renal disease is infrequent. Because early renal dysfunction is associated with the development of CRD, and decreased long-term patient survival, efforts should be made to avoid early renal dysfunction after liver transplantation.     

Association of intraoperative hypotension and pulmonary hypertension with adverse outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Various preoperative, surgical, and postoperative markers of impaired outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation have been reported, but the influence of intraoperative hemodynamic aberrations has not been thoroughly investigated. SETTING: University Hospital.Study design Retrospective cohort analysis. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed computerized anesthesia records to determine associations between occurrences of abnormally low or high mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), cardiac output, heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) with negative surgical outcome. Negative surgical outcome was defined as poor early graft function, primary graft nonfunction, or death attributable to hemodynamic causes. RESULTS: Of 789 patients, 142 (18.0%) had negative surgical outcome. Controlling for the influence of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status > 1, long operation time, cold donor organ ischemia time, and donor age, the only hemodynamic parameters that were independently associated with negative surgical outcome were MAP < 40 mmHg at least once during the procedure (odds ratio [OR] 2.39, p = 0.0016) and MPAP > 40 mmHg at least 3 times during the procedure (OR 2.2, p = 0.035). The occurrence of MAP < 40 mmHg was temporally associated with donor graft reperfusion. Hepatic artery thromboses were not associated with hemodynamic aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic events are independently associated with adverse outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation.     

Risk factors for early hospital readmission after cardiac operations

OBJECTIVE: Early hospital readmissions after cardiac procedures are both costly and harmful to patients. We investigated the factors that predispose to readmission to develop strategies to minimize this problem. METHODS: As part of a prospective data collection, patients having cardiac procedures at our institution are routinely tracked for 30 days after their discharge from the hospital. We reviewed 2650 patients in our cardiac database who underwent operations over the past 5 years. We used univariate and multivariate statistical techniques to identify risks for readmission. RESULTS: Of 2574 discharged patients, 252 (9.8%) required readmission. The most common causes of readmission are cardiac (42%), pulmonary (19%), gastrointestinal (10%), extremity complications (6.7%; deep vein thrombophlebitis, peripheral arterial vascular disease, and saphenous vein harvest site problems), sternal wound problems (7.5%), and metabolic problems (4%). Of more than 70 variables studied, only 6 are significant multivariate predictors of readmission: female sex (P =.002); diabetes (P =.001); chronic lung problems (P =.011); increased distance between home and hospital (P >.001); preoperative atrial fibrillation (P =.002); and preoperative chronic renal insufficiency (P =.002). Type of operation, redo procedures, and other intraoperative and postoperative variables are not important multivariate predictors of readmission. Prolonged hospital length of stay for the initial procedure did not cause more frequent readmission. The costs of initial hospitalization (operating room costs combined with postoperative in-hospital costs) were not significantly increased in those patients who required readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The high-risk patient for readmission is a woman with diabetes, chronic lung disease, renal insufficiency, and preoperative atrial fibrillation who lives at a distance from the hospital. Readmission does not depend on periprocedural variables (eg, cardiopulmonary bypass time) or on postoperative complications. High procedural costs from the initial hospitalization do not predispose to readmission. These results suggest interventions that may reduce readmission.     

Long-term survival after retransplantation of the liver.

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined the long-term outcome of patients undergoing hepatic retransplantation at their institution. Donor, operative, and recipient factors impacting on outcome as well as parameters of patient resource utilization were examined. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic retransplantation provides the only available option for liver transplant recipients in whom an existing graft has failed. However, such patients are known to exhibit patient and graft survival after retransplantation that is inferior to that expected using the same organs in naiive recipients. The critical shortage of donor organs and resultant prolonged patient waiting periods before transplantation prompted the authors to evaluate the results of a liberal policy of retransplantation and to examine the factors contributing to the inferior outcome observed in retransplanted patients. METHODS: A total of 2053 liver transplants were performed at the UCLA Medical Center during a 13-year period from February 1, 1984, to October 1, 1996. A total of 356 retransplants were performed in 299 patients (retransplant rate = 17%). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with survival. Additionally, a case-control comparison was performed between the last 150 retransplanted patients and 150 primarily transplanted patients who were matched for age and United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status. Differences between these groups in donor, operative, and recipient variables were studied for their correlation with patient survival. Days of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and hospital charges incurred during the transplant admissions were compared for retransplanted patients and control patients. RESULTS: Survival of retransplanted patients at 1, 5, and 10 years was 62%, 47%, and 45%, respectively. This survival is significantly less than that seen in patients undergoing primary hepatic transplantation at the authors' center during the same period (83%, 74%, and 68%). A number of variables proved to have a significant impact on outcome including recipient age group, interval to retransplantation, total number of grafts, and recipient UNOS status. Recipient primary diagnosis, cause for retransplantation, and whether the patient was retransplanted before or after June 1, 1992, did not reach statistical significance as factors influencing survival. In the case-control comparison, the authors found that of the more than 25 variables studied, only preoperative ventilator status showed both a significant difference between control patients and retransplanted patients and also was a factor predictive of survival in retransplanted patients. Retransplant patients had significantly longer hospital and intensive care unit stays and accumulated total hospitalization charges more than 170% of those by control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic retransplantation, although life-saving in almost 50% of patients with a failing liver allograft, is costly and uses scarce donor organs inefficiently. The data presented define patient characteristics and preoperative variables that impact patient outcome and should assist in the rational application of retransplantation.     

Survival among pediatric liver transplant recipients: impact of segmental grafts.

Segmental liver transplantation with living donor (LD), reduced cadaveric (Reduced), and split cadaveric (Split) allografts has expanded the availability of size-appropriate organs for pediatric recipients. The relevance of recipient age to the selection of graft type has not been fully explored, but could offer the potential to maximize recipient outcome and donor utilization. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among children 12 years of age or less utilizing the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Cox proportional-hazards analysis was used to explore the association of recipient age and graft type to graft and patient survival. Among children <1 year of age and those 1 to 2 years of age, 3-year LD graft survival was superior to whole cadaveric (CAD) organs, Split grafts, and Reduced grafts (for children <1 year of age: 79.4 vs. 61.5, 66.0, and 61.1%, respectively, P = .0003; and for children 1-2 years of age: 79.2 vs 66.9, 57.1, and 63.9%, respectively, P = .02). However, in children 3 to 12 years of age, after controlling for multiple donor and recipient factors, LD grafts failed to offer a survival advantage (hazard ratio = .61; 95% confidence interval = .37-1.02) compared to CAD organs. In an adjusted analysis examining patient survival, there appeared to be minimal association between recipient age and graft type. Much of the difference in graft survival could be attributed to events in the perioperative period. In conclusion, LD liver transplantation provides improved graft survival in children 2 years of age or less.     

Long-term outcome of split liver transplantation using right extended grafts in adulthood: A matched pair analysis

OBJECTIVE: Shortage of suitable organs led to the development of alternative techniques in liver transplantation. Split liver transplantation (SLT) is well established in pediatric patients. SLT is not completely accepted in adult recipients due to potential increased risk of complications. Despite satisfying results of short-term outcome, there is a leak on information of the long-term outcome. Therefore, we compared the outcome after transplantation of the right extended liver lobe with whole liver transplantation (WLT) using a matched pair's analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the period of January 1993 to February 2005, 70 SLT recipients were matched with 70 WLT recipients of whole livers. Matching criteria were: 1) indication for transplantation, 2) United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, 3) recipient age, 4) donor age, 5) cold ischemic time, and 6) year of transplantation. The outcome was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 36 months. The 2- and 5-year patient survival rates after SLT and WLT were 86.3% and 82.6%, and 78.4% and 75.6%, respectively (log rank, P = 0.2127). Two- and 5-year graft survival rates were 77.3% and 77.3% after SLT and 71.9% and 65.8% after WLT, respectively (log rank, P = 0.3822). The total biliary complication rate was 11.4% in the SLT group versus 10.0% in the WLT group in the short-term course, while it was 8.5% after SLT and 10.0% after WLT in the long-term course. We did not observe significant differences between the groups in term of short- and long-term morbidity. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of the right extended lobe deriving from left lateral splitting of deceased donor livers is followed by the same long-term patient and graft survival, which is known from WLT. There were no differences in the complication rates even in long-term outcome implementing that SLT does not put the adult recipient to an increased early and late risk. Transplantation of the extended right liver lobe provides a safe and efficient procedure in adult patients to expand the number of available grafts.     

肝移植手术后肺部感染的危险因素分析

目的 探讨肝移植手术患者术后肺部感染的危险因素。
方法 回顾性分析2005年6月至2013年6月于三家临床医疗中心首次行原位肝移植手术的1 358例患者的临床资料。根据患者术后30 d内是否发生肺部感染将患者分成两组：感染组和非感染组。收集术前资料、术中资料及术后资料，采用单因素分析及二元Logistic回归分析肝移植术后肺部感染的危险因素。
结果 肝移植手术后有316例（23.3%）发生肺部感染，其中有21例（6.7%）死亡。与非感染组比较，感染组术前诊断为慢性重型肝炎、肝癌、丙型肝炎肝硬化、先天性肝脏疾病及肝衰竭、术前合并肝肾综合征、肝昏迷、糖尿病的比例、术前肌酐浓度明显升高（P<0.05），术前总蛋白、白蛋白浓度明显降低（P<0.05），无肝期时间、术后苏醒时间及术后拔管时间明显延长（P<0.05），术中失血量明显增加（P<0.05），术中尿量明显减少（P<0.05），术中使用去氧肾上腺素、阿托品、利多卡因及呋塞米的比例明显降低（P<0.05），术后死亡率明显升高（P<0.05）。二元Logistic回归分析显示：慢性重型肝炎、丙型肝炎肝硬化、肝衰竭、术前合并糖尿病、术中失血量>1 900 ml、术后苏醒时间>7.3 h是肝移植患者术后肺部感染的危险因素；手术方式（经典非转流原位肝移植）、术中使用利多卡因、术前总蛋白>64.6 g/L、术中尿量>1 800 ml是肝移植手术患者术后肺部感染的保护因素。
结论 术前诊断慢性重型肝炎、丙型肝炎肝硬化、肝衰竭、术前合并糖尿病、术中失血量>1 900 ml、术后苏醒时间>7.3 h是肝移植手术后肺部感染的危险因素。     

The effect of surgical site infections on outcomes and resource utilization after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Although postoperative infections have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), less is known about their economic implications. In this study, we sought to identify risk factors and estimate the impact of surgical site infections on 1-year mortality, graft survival, and resource utilization after OLT. METHODS: We studied 777 first, single-organ liver transplant recipients from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database. Surgical site infections (n = 292, 37.8%) were defined as bacterial or fungal infections of the liver, intestine, biliary tract, surgical wound, or peritoneum within 1 year of transplantation. A subset of these (n = 159) occurred during the transplant hospitalization and were used to estimate excess charges associated with surgical site infections. RESULTS: Leaks in the choledochojejunostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 7.1, P =.001) and choledochocholedochostomy (OR = 2.5, P =.002), extended operation duration in hours (OR = 1.2, P =.002), serum albumin levels in grams per liters (OR = 0.71, P =.009), ascites (OR = 1.43, P =.037), and administration of OKT3 within 7 days (OR = 1.49, P =.039) significantly increased risk of infection. Surgical site infections did not significantly increase 1-year mortality (88.5% vs 91.5%, P =.19) but significantly increased 1-year graft loss (79.8% vs 86.5%, P =.022). Patients with surgical site infections incurred approximately 24 extra hospital days and $159,967 in excess charges (P =.0001). Multivariate analysis reduced the estimate of excess charges to $131,276 (P =.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients who develop surgical site infection have significantly higher resource utilization requirements than those who do not. These results imply substantial returns to preventative efforts directed at surgical site infections in patients undergoing OLT.     

Pneumonectomy for malignant disease: factors affecting early morbidity and mortality

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to analyze factors affecting morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy for malignant disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of all patients who underwent pneumonectomy for malignancy at the Mayo Clinic. Between January 1, 1985, and September 30, 1998, 639 patients (469 men and 170 women) were identified. Median age was 64 years (range 20 to 86 years). Indication for pneumonectomy was primary lung cancer in 607 (95.0%) patients and metastatic disease in 32 (5.0%). Factors affecting morbidity and mortality were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary complications occurred in 245 patients (38.3%; 95% confidence interval 34.6%-42.2%). Factors adversely affecting morbidity with univariate analysis included age (P <.0001), male sex (P =.04), associated respiratory (P =.02) or cardiovascular disease (P <.0001), cigarette smoking (P =.02), decreased vital capacity (P =.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P <.0001), forced vital capacity (P =.002), diffusion capacity of the lung to carbon monoxide (P =.005), oxygen saturation (P <.05), arterial PO (2) (P =.007), preoperative radiation (P =.02), bronchial stump reinforcement (P =.007), crystalloid infusion (P =.01), and blood transfusion (P =.02). Factors adversely affecting morbidity with multivariate analysis included age (P =.0001), associated cardiovascular disease (P =.001), and bronchial stump reinforcement (P =.0005). There were 45 deaths (7.0%; 95% confidence intervals 5.2%-9.3%). Factors adversely affecting mortality with univariate analysis included associated cardiovascular (P <.0001) or hematologic disease (P <.005), lower preoperative serum hemoglobin level (P =.004), preoperative chemotherapy (P =.01), decreased diffusion capacity of lung to carbon monoxide (P =.002), right pneumonectomy (P =.0006), extended resection (P =.04), bronchial stump reinforcement (P =.007), and crystalloid infusion (P =.01). Factors affecting mortality with multivariate analysis included hematologic disease (P =.01), lower preoperative serum hemoglobin (P =.003), and completion pneumonectomy (P =.01). CONCLUSION: Multiple factors adversely affected morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy for malignant disease. Appropriate selection and meticulous perioperative care are paramount to minimize risks in those patients who require pneumonectomy.     

Thrombocytopenia in liver transplant recipients: predictors, impact on fungal infections, and role of endogenous thrombopoietin

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a frequent and potentially serious complication in liver transplant recipients. The role of endogenous thrombopoietin level in posttransplant thrombocytopenia, has not been fully defined in liver transplant recipients. Additionally, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that platelets play a important role in antimicrobial host defense. METHODS: There were 50 consecutive liver transplant recipients studied. Variables predictive of thrombocytopenia, its impact on infectious morbidity and outcome, and serial thrombopoietin (TPO) serum concentration were assessed. RESULTS: The median pretransplant platelet count was 67 x 10(3)/cmm. After the liver transplantation, the median nadir platelet count was 33 x 10(3)/cmm and was reached a mean of 6 days after the transplant. A lower pretransplant platelet count (r= +.068, P=.0001), lower serum albumin before the transplants (r=+0.39, P=.014), longer operation time (r=0.27, P=.05), higher intraoperative packed red cells (r=0.28, P=.049) and fresh frozen plasma transfusions (r=0.42, P=.004), higher bilirubin at Day 7 (r=-.386, P=.005), and higher serum creatinine at Day 7 after the transplants (r=-.031, P=.025) correlated significantly with a lower nadir in platelets after the transplant. Nadir in platelet count was significantly lower in nonsurvivors compared with survivors (16 vs. 36 x 10(3)/cmm, P=.0001). Forty-three percent (9 of 21) of the patients with nadir platelet counts of < or =30 x 10(3)/cmm had a major infection within 30 days of the transplant compared with 17% (5 of 29) with nadir platelet counts > 30 x 10(3)/cmm (P=.04). Fungal infections occurred in 14% of the patients with nadir platelet counts of < or =30 x 10(3)/cmm versus 0% in those with nadir platelet counts of > 30 x 10(3)/cmm (P=.06); all patients with fungal infections had nadir platelet counts of < or =30 x 10(3)/cmm before fungal infection. Nadir in platelet count preceded the first major infection by a median of 7 days. Pretransplant TPO level did not differ between survivors (mean 103 pg/ml) or nonsurvivors (mean 144 pg/ml). After the transplantation, TPO levels increased in both groups. TPO level peaked at Day 7 and subsequently declined in survivors. Nonsurvivors had persistent thrombocytopenia despite a progressive rise in TPO level; TPO level was significantly higher at Day 7 (P=.02), Day 9 (P=.0019), and Day 14 (P=.04) in nonsurvivors compared with survivors. CONCLUSION: Persistent thrombocytopenia portended a poor outcome in liver transplant recipients and was not related to low TPO levels. Thrombocytopenia preceded infections and identified a subgroup of liver transplant patients susceptible to early major infections; its precise role in fungal infections warrants validation in larger studies.