Tolerability of postexposure prophylaxis with zidovudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir for human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Tolerability of the combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir used as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV infection was prospectively evaluated among 185 patients at 11 hospitals in eastern France. After exclusion of the 106 persons who discontinued PEP either because the source patient subsequently tested HIV seronegative or because the injury was reassessed as resulting in a low risk for transmission of HIV, 67 (85%) of the patients who received such PEP experienced adverse effects, which led to withdrawal of nelfinavir in 28 (35%) of these patients.     

Long-term virologic and immunologic responses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children treated with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine

Virologic and immunologic responses were examined for 33 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children who participated for > or = 96 weeks in a phase 1/2 protocol of 16 weeks of indinavir monotherapy, followed by the addition of zidovudine and lamivudine. At week 96, a median increase of 199 CD4+ T cells/microL and a median decrease of 0.74 log(10) HIV RNA copies/mL were observed. The relationship between control of viral replication and CD4) T cell count was examined. Patients were categorized into 3 response groups on the basis of duration and extent of control of viral replication. Of 21 children with a transient decrease in virus load of > or = 0.7 log(10) HIV RNA copies/mL from baseline, 7 experienced sustained increases in CD4+, CD4+ CD45RA+, and CD4+ CD45RO+ T cell counts. CD4+ CD45RA+ (naive) T cells were the major contributor to CD4+ T cell expansion. Continued long-term immunologic benefit may be experienced by a subset of children, despite only transient virologic suppression.     

Long-term prognosis following zidovudine monotherapy in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection

Eighty-five subjects with symptomatic primary (P) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection were analyzed in a retrospective cohort study to investigate the long-term clinical benefit of antiretroviral treatment during PHIV infection. Zidovudine treatment was initiated (PHIV treatment group) in 21 persons a median of 9 days after onset of PHIV symptoms and continued for a median of 55 days (range, 21-99). Sixty-four subjects did not receive early antiretroviral treatment (PHIV nontreatment group). After follow-up for 3-10 years, 33 subjects had developed AIDS and 22 subjects had died of AIDS. The median times for progression to AIDS and death were 6.4 and 9.1 years, respectively. Progression rates did not differ between the PHIV treatment and nontreatment groups. Zidovudine treatment initiated during PHIV infection did not improve long-term outcome after symptomatic PHIV infection.     

Effect of zidovudine resistance mutations on virologic response to treatment with zidovudine-lamivudine-ritonavir: genotypic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from AIDS clinical trials group protocol 315.ACTG Protocol 315 Team

The effect of baseline drug resistance mutations on response to zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir was evaluated in zidovudine-experienced persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Presence of the K70R mutation was associated with significantly higher plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at baseline. However, presence of resistance mutations did not affect the increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA during a 5-week drug washout, nor was there any effect on first-phase virus decay rates after initiation of therapy or on the probability of having plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <100 copies/mL at week 48. Polymorphisms at protease codons 10, 36, and 71 were associated with significantly faster second-phase decay rates. Suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA despite presence of zidovudine resistance mutations implies that the presence of these mutations does not preclude a durable response to treatment with a potent 3-drug regimen.     

Utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing and clinical response in patients with three class resistance and virologic treatment failure

We sought to determine the utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing (GRT) and the clinical response in HIV-1-infected patients with known resistance to three of the major classes of antiretroviral drugs. The HIV-1 genetic sequences for 20 patients who had high-level 3 class resistance demonstrated on a prior GRT (3C-GRT 1) measured during the period from November 1, 2000 through July 1, 2004 were retrospectively evaluated. At the time of 3C-GRT 1, the median CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA viral load were 168 cells/mm(3) and 4.5 log copies per milliliter, respectively. The median time to the second GRT (3C-GRT 2) was 17 months. At that time, the median CD4 count and VL were 140 cells/mm(3) and 4.9 log copies per milliliter (p = 0.8 and p = 0.12, respectively). On 3C-GRT 2, all patients retained essentially identical mutations, with the exception of the loss of the M184V mutation in 6 patients. After 3C-GRT 2, all patients continued on protease inhibitor-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens. At 24 weeks after 3C-GRT 2, there was no significant change in CD4 count or HIV-1 RNA viral load (p = 0.68 and p = 0.30, respectively). Repeat GRT in patients with documented high-level 3 class resistance does not provide new or clinically useful information. Under continued antiretroviral selective pressure, the viral genetic sequences in this patient population remained stable. In addition, continuing HAART regimens containing protease inhibitors appeared to forestall further immunological and virologic deterioration in patients with multiple resistance mutations. Providers should focus on obtaining access to combinations of novel agents for patients with 3 class resistance rather than repeated GRT.     

The efficacy of combined zidovudine and lamivudine compared with that of combined zidovudine,lamivudine and nelfinavir in asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children

In this 6-month prospective study, we compared the efficacy of two treatment regimens: double-drug therapy with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC) and triple-drug therapy with ZDV plus 3TC plus nelfinavir (NFV), in the treatment of asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children. Twenty-five children were enrolled in this study and were divided into 2 groups: group A, consisting of 13 children who were given ZDV+3TC; group B, consisting of 12 children who were given ZDV+3TC+NFV. Serial determinations of weight, CD4-cell count, HIV RNA or plasma viral load (VL) and complete blood counts (CBC), liver function tests (LFT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) tests, creatinine and serum amylase tests were performed at study entry and at 1, 3 and 6 months. The side-effects of drugs were recorded. Over the 6-month period, the median weight increase in group B (24%) was higher than in group A (2%). The median CD4-cell count increase from baseline in group B (94.5%) was better than in group A (9.4%). The reduction of VL below baseline in group B (1.2 log10; 20.8%) was also better than in group A (0.72 log10; 13.8%). However, these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Both combination regimens could not completely suppress HIV RNA below detectable limits (<400 copies/ml). Both groups tolerated the regimens well; no side-effects or toxicities occurred. The efficacy levels of triple-drug therapy (ZDV+3TC+NFV) and double-drug therapy (ZDV+3TC) were not different. There were no side-effects and no deaths during the 6-month study period.     

Treatment with amprenavir alone or amprenavir with zidovudine and lamivudine in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 347 Study Team

Amprenavir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and good in vitro activity. Ninety-two lamivudine- and protease inhibitor-naive individuals with >/=50 CD4 cells/mm3 and >/=5000 HIV RNA copies/mL were assigned amprenavir (1200 mg) alone or with zidovudine (300 mg) plus lamivudine (150 mg), all given every 12 h. After a median follow-up of 88 days, the findings of a planned interim review resulted in termination of the amprenavir monotherapy arm. Among 85 subjects with confirmed plasma HIV RNA determination, 15 of 42 monotherapy versus 1 of 43 triple-therapy subjects had an HIV RNA increase above baseline or 1 log10 above nadir (P=.0001). For subjects taking triple therapy at 24 weeks, the median decrease in HIV RNA was 2.04 log10 copies/mL, and 17 (63%) of 27 evaluable subjects had <500 HIV RNA copies/mL. Treatment with amprenavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine together reduced the levels of HIV RNA significantly more than did amprenavir monotherapy.     

高效抗逆转录病毒治疗15例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者一年总结

目的 首次报道我国于1999年5月开始对人类免疫缺陷病毒（HIV）－1感染者的规范化高效抗逆转录病毒治疗。方法 用齐多夫定＋拉米夫定（AZT＋3TC,商品名：双汰芝）联合硫酸茚地那韦（indinavir,商品名：佳息患）对15例HIV感染或艾滋病患者进行为期1年的治疗。随访指标为病毒载量和T淋巴细胞亚群分析。结果 15例随访1年,用药3个月后HIV－1 RNA平均值至198拷贝／ml,比治疗前的90743RNA拷贝／ml下降2.7log。用药后12个月CD4细胞计数平均增加67个／μl,CD8细胞计数平均减少192个／μl,CD4／CD8比例从0．35增加到0．56,15例中2例未作T淋巴细胞亚群分类,13例治疗后3、6、9、12个月CD4^ 童贞细胞（CD45RA＋CD62L＋）数呈现平稳上升趋势,在治疗1年时平均升高42个／μl。而CD8^ 童贞细胞（CD45RA＋CD62L＋）数平均升高19个/μl。所有患者用药后出现消化道反应,3例出现一过性黄疸,2例出现泌尿系结石。结论 与国外临床报道的治疗效果相一致,15例HIV－1不同阶段感染者经治疗后病毒载量水平明显降低,CD4平均细胞数有所增加,在具有不同病毒基因亚型的病例显示同样的治疗效果。     

Long-term incidence of hepatitis B virus resistance to lamivudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistance to lamivudine has not been extensively documented in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. We studied the long-term incidence of HBV resistance to lamivudine in HIV-positive patients. Sixty-six HIV-HBV-coinfected patients were studied while receiving lamivudine (150 mg twice daily) as a part of antiretroviral therapy. All these patients had a detectable serum HBV DNA at the beginning of lamivudine therapy. Serum HBV DNA was quantified by molecular hybridization. Sequence analysis of the HBV polymerase was performed in patients who became resistant to lamivudine. After 2 months of lamivudine, HBV DNA became undetectable in 57 patients (86.4%, 95% CI: 75.7%-93.6%). After 2 years of lamivudine, 47% +/- 18.6% of the patients, had sustained HBV-DNA suppression. All the 22 tested patients with HBV resistance developed mutation at position 550 in the YMDD motif of the DNA polymerase. None of the following variables were associated with an increased risk of lamivudine resistance: age, associated protease inhibitor therapy, Center for Disease Control (CDC) stage C, known HIV-infection duration, serum HBV-DNA level at baseline, CD4 cell count and serum alanine transaminase levels at baseline and at HBV-replication suppression (2 months of lamivudine). Lamivudine (300 mg/d) is effective for the inhibition of HBV replication in HIV-infected patients. However, emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV may occur in 20% of patients per year.     

Thymic size and lymphocyte restoration in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection after 48 weeks of zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir therapy

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with progressive loss of circulating CD4+ lymphocytes. Treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to increases in CD4+ T lymphocytes of naive (CD45RA+62L+) and memory (CD45R0+RA-) phenotypes. Thymic computerized tomography scans were obtained on 30 individuals with HIV disease to investigate the role of the thymus in cellular restoration after 48 weeks of HAART. Individuals with abundant thymic tissue had higher naive CD4+ T lymphocyte counts at weeks 2-24 after therapy than individuals with minimal thymic tissue. Individuals with abundant thymic tissue had significantly larger increases in naive CD4+ cells during the first 4 weeks of therapy. These individuals were also more likely to experience viral rebound despite comparable initial declines in plasma HIV-1 RNA. These findings suggest that there is a complex relationship among the thymus, viral replication, and lymphocyte restoration after application of HAART in HIV disease.     

Prospective randomized trial of emtricitabine versus lamivudine short-term monotherapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

We conducted a randomized, open-label, 10-day study that compared the antiretroviral activity of emtricitabine (FTC) 25, 100, and 200 mg once daily and lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg 2 times/day in 82 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with virus loads >5000 and <100,000 copies/mL who were naive for 3TC and abacavir. All FTC doses demonstrated potent antiretroviral activity. Significantly greater virus suppression was seen at the 200 mg/day dose of FTC than with the lower FTC doses and/or 3TC (P=.02, P=.04, and P=.04, respectively). At the 200 mg/day dose, FTC produced a 1.7-log10 mean reduction in virus load. Trough FTC levels at the 200 mg/day dose exceeded the in vitro 90% inhibitory concentration dose for FTC by 5-fold. The long plasma half-life and the superior antiviral activity versus 3TC of the 200 mg/day FTC dose confirmed the results of other studies and led to the selection of this dose for subsequent therapeutic trials.     

Tenofovir, adefovir, and zidovudine susceptibilities of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates with non-B subtypes or nucleoside resistance

New antiretroviral drugs with activity against strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with non-B subtypes and with resistance to current antiretroviral drugs are needed. The activity of two nucleotide analogs, tenofovir and adefovir (PMPA and PMEA, respectively), against non-B subtypes and nucleoside-resistant primary HIV-1 isolates was assessed. Tenofovir and adefovir were fully active against a panel of subtypes A, C, D, E, F, G, and group O primary HIV-1 isolates as compared with their respective activity against subtype B isolates. Moreover, the susceptibility of a panel of 10 primary HIV-1 isolates with >10-fold mean resistance to zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir was within 2.2-fold of wild-type tenofovir susceptibility for each isolate. An oral prodrug of tenofovir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF), is currently in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. These in vitro susceptibility results suggest that tenofovir DF may be active in vivo against HIV-1 with nucleoside resistance as well as against HIV-1 with non-B subtypes.