Marked erythrocyte microcytosis under primary immunosuppression with sirolimus

The preliminary observation of marked erythrocyte microcytosis in patients treated with sirolimus (SRL) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been evaluated as part of a prospective study comparing SRL and cyclosporin A (CsA) as a primary immunosuppressant. Normal risk de novo kidney recipients were randomized either to SRL or to CsA. Additional immunosuppressants consisted of MMF and prednisone. In patients with erythrocyte microcytosis, iron deficiency was excluded by measuring serum ferritin and transferrin saturation rate. Fifty-nine patients (30 in SRL and 29 in CsA) were included. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (fl) on day 7 was 91.7 +/- 4.8 in SRL group versus 91.4 +/- 4.2 in CsA group (P = 0.77), whereas mean MCV on day 183 post-transplant was 78.5 +/- 3.8 in SRL group versus 88.4 +/- 3.4 in CsA group (P < 0.0001). Hemoglobin concentration (g/dl) was not significantly different. Only two patients in SRL group presented decreased transferrin saturation rate. Marked erythrocyte microcytosis without persistent anemia was observed in patients treated with SRL and MMF.     

Low incidence of kidney rejection after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation after antithymocyte globulin induction and in the absence of corticosteroids: results of a prospective pilot study in 28 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND: Recipients of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation receive a combination of polyclonal antithymocyte globulin (ATG), cyclosporin or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids (Cs). To avoid the side effects and adverse events associated with Cs, we investigated a new immunosuppressive regimen without Cs after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. METHODS: A total of 28 consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation were included in this study. All patients received ATG, cyclosporin, and MMF. RESULTS: All patients but one tolerated the ATG course well. MMF was definitively discontinued in three patients because of leukopenia. Cytomegalovirus infection was diagnosed in eight patients (28.5%). Only two patients (7%) required an antirejection treatment. Patient, kidney, and pancreas survival is currently 96.4, 96.4, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ATG, cyclosporin, and MMF, without Cs, was well tolerated. The unexpectedly low (7%) incidence of acute kidney rejection observed suggests that Cs may partially interfere with the immunosuppressive effect of ATG.     

肾移植后不同免疫抑制方案的效果及不良反应的临床分析

目的 总结肾移植后使用不同免疫抑制方案的效果和不良反应,以提高人/肾的长期存活率.方法 对单中心3102例肾移植受者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,所采用的免疫抑制方案有环孢素A(CsA)+硫唑嘌呤(Aza)+泼尼松(Pred)、低剂量CsA+吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)+Pred、低剂量他克莫司(Tac)+MMF+Pred、低剂量CsA(或Tac)+西罗莫司(SRL)+Pred等方案,分析各方案的效果和不良反应.结果 低剂量CsA+MMF+Pred方案的人/肾1、5、10年存活率均高于CsA+Aza+Pred方案,而高血压、震颤、高尿酸、肝肾毒性、白细胞下降等的发生率显著低于CsA+Aza+Pred方案(P＜0.05),腹泻发生率显著高于CsA+Aza+Pred方案(P＜0.05).低剂量Tac+MMF+Pred方案的高血糖发生率显著高于低剂量CsA+MMF+Pred方案(P＜0.05),多毛症发生率显著低于低剂量CsA+MMF+Pred方案(P＜0.05);低剂量CsA(或Tac)+SRL+Pred方案的腹泻、高尿酸血症、肝肾毒性和多毛症等的发生率显著低于低剂量CsA(或Tac)+MMF+Pred方案(P＜0.05),但高血脂发生率显著高于后者(P＜0.05).以低剂量Tac为基础的方案者高血糖发生率显著应用低剂量CsA者.结论 低剂量CsA(或Tac)+MMF+Pred方案改善了肾移植受者和移植肾的存活,降低了不良反应发生率,尤以低剂量Tac+MMF+Pred方案为优;调整免疫抑制方案或剂量,改善饮食习惯,加强锻炼,优化降血压、降血脂、控制血糖的治疗措施对预防和控制不良反应尤为重要.

Abstract：

Objective To summarize the incidence and treatment experience of the effectiveness and adverse reactions of the different immunosuppressive protocols and to increase the long-term survival rate in kidney recipients. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 3102 cases of kidney transplant recipients in effectiveness and adverse reactions of different immunosuppressive protocols. The immunosuppressive protocols were as follows: CsA + Aza + Pred,low dose CsA + MMF + Pred, low dose Tac + MMF + Pred, low dose CsA + SRL + Pred, and low dose Tac+ SRL+ Pred. Results The 1-, 5-, 10-year survival rate of patients/kidney in low dose CsA + MMF + Pred protocol was higher than that in CsA + Aza + Pred protocol. The incidence of adverse reactions, such as hypertension, hyperuricemia, kidney and liver toxicity, and leukopenia was significantly lower, but the incidence of diarrhea was significantly higher in CsA + MMF + Pred protocol than in CsA + Aza + Pred protocol (all P＜0. 01). The incidence of hyperglycemia was significantly higher (P＜0. 05), and that of hairy and gingival hyperplsia was significantly lower (P＜0. 05) in low dose Tac+ MMF+ Pred than in low dose CsA+ MMF+ Pred protocol. The incidence of hyperlipidemia in low dose CsA (or Tac)+ SRL + Pred was significantly higher than in CsA (or Tac)+ MMF+ Pred protocol (P＜0. 05). The incidence of hirsutism in low dose Tac + SRL + Pred was significantly lower than that in CsA + SRL + Pred protocol (P ＜ 0. 05). The incidence of hyperglycemia in low dose Tac + SRL + Pred was significantly higher than that in low dose CsA + SRL + Pred protocol. Conclusion The triple drug protocol with a low dose of CsA (or Tac)+ MMF+ Pred significantly improved the survival of renal transplant recipients and graft, and reduced the incidence of adverse reactions, especially Tae + MMF + Pred protocol. Adjustment of the immunosuppressant dosage and protocol, improvement of eating habits, exercise, reduction of blood pressure, reduction of blood lipid, and control of blood glucose were particularly important in preventing and controlling adverse reactions during kidney transplantation.     

肾移植术后应用他克莫司的临床观察

目的 观察他克莫司（ＦＫ５０６）作为免疫抑制剂的有效性和安全性。方法 将首次接受同种异体肾移植的３５例患者随机分为２组,一组给予他克莫司,硫唑嘌呤（或霉酚酸酯）和泼尼松（ＦＫ５０６组）,另一组给予环孢素Ａ、硫唑嘌呤（或霉酚酸酯）及泼尼松（ＣｓＡ组）,观察２个组的免疫抑制效果及药物的副作用。结果 ＣｓＡ组和ＦＫ５０６组的人／肾１年存活率分别为１００．０％／９３／３％和９５．０％／９５．０％;两组肝和     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at 2 years

BACKGROUND: A previous report described the 1-year results of a prospective, randomized trial designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants in kidney transplantation. Recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were treated with tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine oral solution (modified) (CsA)+MMF, or tacrolimus+azathioprine (AZA). Results at 1 year revealed that optimal efficacy and safety were achieved with a regimen containing tacrolimus+MMF. The present report describes results at 2 years. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, or tacrolimus+AZA. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function. Patients were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: The results at 2 years corroborate and extend the findings of the previous report. Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing tacrolimus experienced improved kidney function. New-onset insulin dependence remained in four, three, and four patients in the tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, and tacrolimus+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients with delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis who were treated with tacrolimus+MMF experienced a 23% increase in allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (P=0.06). Patients randomized to tacrolimus+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF compared with those administered CsA+MMF. CONCLUSIONS: All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.     

Economic evaluation of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in kidney graft recipients

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was an economic evaluation of three sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens in the first 2 years after renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The three SRL-based immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplant patients between June 2000 and September 2002 were: (1) SRL + steroids + cyclosporine (CsA) permanently; (2) SRL + steroids + tacrolimus (Tac); and (3) SRL + steroids + CsA, with CsA discontinuation at 3 months posttransplant. Ten patients were included in each group in an intent-to-treat analysis. Cost was calculated according to the hospital price list and recast into euros (EUR) with a 5% discount rate. RESULTS: The number of patients free of an acute rejection episode during 2 years posttransplant were 6, 8, and 5, with 2-year graft and patient survivals of 9, 10, and 9 for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. As differences in clinical effects were not statistically significant, cost analysis was appropriate instead of cost-effectiveness analysis. The mean cost of the 2-year treatment was 15,759 EUR; 25,593 EUR; and 21,197 EUR per patient for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Sensitivity analysis for the main variables confirmed that the results were not dependent on changes in costs. CONCLUSIONS: Regimen 1 was the most economical immunosuppressive therapy during the 2 years after kidney transplantation. Studies on a larger group of longer observation would be more useful for clinical analysis.     

Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study.

Steroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation despite their adverse effects. The introduction of new immunosuppressant has improved the survival rates and prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal at 6 months post-transplant between tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine A + MMF (CsA group). Steroid was withdrawn at 6 months post-transplant under the condition of no rejection episode proven by biopsy and maintenance of serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl. Fourteen recipients were excluded because of acute rejection within 6 months or protocol violation. Steroid could be tapered off in 62 in FK group and 55 in CsA. Three cases in FK group and five in CsA had acute rejection within another 6 months after steroid withdrawal (P > 0.05). At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes was 18.6% vs. 8.0% in FK and CsA group. And hypercholesterolemia was presented in 8.5% vs. 2.0%, hypertension in 47.5% vs. 56.0%, and serum creatinine level 1.18 +/- 0.24 mg/dl vs. 1.18 +/- 0.20 mg/dl, respectively (P > 0.05). Steroid withdrawal may be carried out successfully using both FK and CsA with MMF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.     

Long-term renal allograft function on a tacrolimus-based, pred-free maintenance immunosuppression comparing sirolimus vs. MMF.

It is not known how different steroid-free immunosuppressive combinations affect renal graft survival and long-term kidney transplant function. Here we sought to compare the impact on graft survival and long-term graft function of two tacrolimus (Tac)-based, prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocols: Tac/Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) vs. Tac/Sirolimus (SRL). Renal transplant patients given induction therapy with IL2-RA and methylprednisolone on days 0, 1 and 2 post-transplant were prospectively randomized to two maintenance immunosuppressive regimens with Tac/MMF (n = 45) or Tac/SRL (n = 37). During the 3-year follow-up the following data were collected: patient survival, renal allograft survival, incidence of acute rejection and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at different time-points post-transplant. Cumulative graft survival was significantly different in the two groups: one kidney loss in the Tac/MMF vs. six kidney losses in the Tac/SRL (log-rank test p = 0.04). GFR at different time-points post-transplant was consistently and statistically better in the Tac/MMF than in the Tac/SRL group. The slope of GFR decline per month was flatter in the Tac/MMF than in the Tac/SRL group. This study showed that renal graft survival and graft function were significantly lower in the combination of Tac/SRL than Tac/MMF.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months

BACKGROUND: This is the first report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Results at 6 months of follow-up are presented. METHODS: Before transplantation, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Patient and graft survival, renal function, and composite endpoints also were evaluated. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: By 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups (13.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 11.4% tacrolimus+MMF; P=0.64 log-rank). Patient survival (97.3% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 97.7% tacrolimus+MMF) and graft survival (93.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 95.5% tacrolimus+MMF) were equivalent (P=0.53, overall survival log-rank). There was a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation in patients receiving sirolimus (21.1% vs. 10.8%; P=0.008). Renal function was significantly better in the MMF-treatment group (serum creatinine 1.44+/-0.45 mg/dL vs. 1.77+/-1.42 mg/dL; P=0.018). Hyperlipidemia was significantly more prevalent in the sirolimus-treatment group. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in sirolimus-treated patients. There were significantly more leukopenia and gastrointestinal adverse events in the MMF-treatment group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 7.6% in the sirolimus group and 7.7% in the MMF group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF. The tacrolimus-MMF combination may be superior in terms of improved renal function and improved cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and hypertension.     

Variations in the frequency and type of infections in heart transplantation according to the immunosuppression regimen

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of infection according to the immunosuppressive regimens used in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 259 consecutive heart transplants we excluded pediatric cases, retransplants, combined transplants (lung and kidney) and immunosuppressive regimens with fewer than 10 cases. The six groups analyzed were: (1) OKT3 (7 days) + cyclosporine (CsA) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroids (S); (2) OKT3 (7 days) + CsA + azathioprine (AZA) + S; (3) OKT3 (10 days) + CsA + MMF + S; (4) OKT3 (10 days) + CsA + AZA + S; (5) interleukin-2 (IL-2) antagonists + CsA + MMF + S; (6) IL-2 antagonists + tacrolimus + MMF + S. Infection was considered significant when it causal hospital admission or prolonged hospitalization. RESULTS: With a total mean follow-up of 54 +/- 43 months, the total percentage of infection-free patients at the end of follow-up was 45.5%. Infection-free survival was lower among patients administered induction with OKT3 antibodies for 10 days, combined with cyclosporine, either with MMF (10%, group 3) or with azathioprine (27%, group 4), compared to those given IL-2 antagonists (particularly in combination with tacrolimus and MMF-69.2%, group 6). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that infection was frequent in heart transplantation. Furthermore, induction therapy with OKT3 monoclonal antibodies was associated with an important number of infections (particularly viral infections). Comparison of the treatment groups showed that the regimen associated with fever infections included an IL-2 receptor antagonist with tacrolimus, MMF, and S.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Comparative effects of sirolimus and cyclosporin on conduit arteries endothelial function in kidney recipients

This study attempted to establish whether a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐free immunosuppressant regimen based on sirolimus (SRL) is associated with a preservation of conduit arteries endothelial function in kidney recipients or not. Twenty‐nine kidney recipients were randomized to receive since transplantation SRL (n = 15) or cyclosporin A (CsA, n = 14) associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (6 months) in a parallel prospective study. Systolic, diastolic blood pressures, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and radial artery flow‐mediated dilatation (FMD) induced by postischaemic hyperaemia were assessed in a blind manner at one (M1) and 7 months (M7) after transplantation. Endothelium‐independent dilatation was assessed by glyceryl trinitrate spray. There was no difference between the groups for all vascular parameters at M1. At M7, systolic blood pressure was lower (SRL: 119 ± 3 vs. CsA: 138 ± 4 mmHg, P < 0.05) and FMD was higher in SRL compared with CsA (SRL: 13.1 ± 0.9 vs. CsA: 9.9 ± 0.9%, P < 0.05) without any difference for hyperaemia, endothelium‐independent dilatation and GFR (SRL: 66.7 ± 1.05 vs. CsA: 67.5 ± 1.22 ml/min). Our results demonstrate that a CNI‐free regimen based on SRL and MMF prevents conduit artery endothelial dysfunction compared with CsA and MMF in kidney recipients suggesting a beneficial arterial wall effect that may also contribute to the decrease in systolic blood pressure.     

Risk factors for wound healing complications in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients

Impaired surgical site healing occurs in 20% to 50% of sirolimus (SRL)-treated renal transplant (RT) recipients, with most patients having received concomitant corticosteroids. We determined the incidence of surgical site complications among RT recipients receiving SRL with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with most patients on a steroid-avoidance protocol. SRL/MMF patients with complications within 3 months of transplantation were compared with 1) SRL/MMF patients without them and 2) matched RT recipients receiving tacrolimus (FK)/MMF. Between January 2002 and March 2005, 44 of 300 (15%) RT recipients received SRL within 6 weeks of transplantation. Fourteen (31.8%) developed lymphocele, bladder leak, wound dehiscence, cellulitis, or an abscess. Obesity (BMI > or =30 kg/m2) was significantly associated with problems: the mean BMI of SRL cases with complications was 29.9 kg/m2 vs 25.4 kg/m2 for SRL patients without them (P = .047). Seventy-one percent of obese SRL patients experienced complications compared with 24.3% (P = .025) of non-obese SRL patients. Surgical treatment was required in 29% of patients. Rates of maintenance steroid use were similar in SRL complicated cases compared with SRL patients without them. The FK control group showed a lower rate of complications (14.3%; P = .163) despite similar BMI, rejection rates, and chronic steroid use as the SRL group. Obesity and graft rejection were independent predictors of complications. Thus, among a group of predominantly steroid-free recipients on SRL, the rates of wound complications were similar to those seen previously, but the highest risk for them was observed in obese recipients and in those with acute rejection episodes. Wound complications were associated with significant morbidity.     

Randomized trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy with steroid withdrawal in living‐donor renal transplantation: 5‐year follow‐up

The aim of this study was to compare the long‐term safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive regimens consisting of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF after steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation in low‐risk patients. One hundred and thirty‐one patients were randomized to receive either CsA (n = 63) or TAC (n = 68). Of these, 117 patients satisfied the criteria for steroid withdrawal (no biopsy‐proven rejection episode and serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl 6 months after transplantation). Fifty‐five recipients were of the CsA group, and 62 were of the TAC group. The 5‐year graft survival rate did not differ between groups (90.5% vs. 93.3% respectively; P = 0.55). The cumulative incidence of acute rejection 5 years after transplantation was 16.4% and 8.1% for the CsA and TAC groups respectively (P = 0.15). Post‐transplantation diabetes mellitus was more frequent in the TAC group than in the CsA group (P = 0.05), but the incidence of other side‐effects did not differ between groups. In conclusion, CsA‐ and TAC‐based regimens in conjunction with MMF have similar patient‐ and graft survival rates in low‐risk patients who underwent steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation.     

Immunosuppression for Dual Kidney Transplantation with Marginal Organs: The Old Is Better Yet

Immunosuppressive protocols in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We wonder whether a CNI-free immunosuppression can improve outcome in older patients receiving a DKT with marginal donor organs. Thirty-six were treated with CsA, MMF and prednisone (CsA group) and 42 with rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone (SRL group). Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was 44% and 11% in the CsA group, and 40% and 8% in the SRL group. CMV infection incidence was low in both protocols. Three-year patient survival was 89% in the CsA and 76% in the SRL group. One- and 3-year graft survival after censoring for dead with a functioning allograft was 94.2% and 94% in CsA and 95% and 90% in SRL, respectively. Renal function was similar in both groups whereas proteinuria was higher in the SRL group. Uninephrectomy due to graft thrombosis or urinary-related complications was numerically higher in the SRL (21%) than in the CsA group (8%) (p = 0.13) and it was associated with renal failure and proteinuria. In DKT, a new induction immunosuppressive protocol based on rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone does not offer any advantage in comparison to the old CsA, MMF and prednisone.     

乙型肝炎病毒携带者肾移植后应用他克莫司和环孢素A对肝功能影响的比较

目的 探讨乙型肝炎病毒携带者肾移植术后应用他克莫司（FK506）和环孢素A（CsA）对肝功能的影响。方法 73例乙型肝炎病毒（HBV）携带者接受肾移植，术前患者的肝功能正常，HBVDNA阴性。术后将患者分为两组：FK506组40例，术后服用FK506、霉酚酸酯（MMF）及泼尼松（Pred）预防排斥反应；CsA组33例，术后服用CsA、MMF及Pred预防排斥反应。术后追踪随访1～6年，观察两个组患者肝功能损害情况以及HBVDNA阳性率，发生肝功能损害时，调整免疫抑制剂的用量，并给予护肝治疗。结果 术后FK506组有4例（10．0％）、CsA组有16例（48．5％）发生肝功能损害，FK506组有2例（5．0％）、CsA组有9例（27．3％）HBVDNA转阳性，两组比较，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。CsA组肝功能损害的16例中，10例将CsA切换为FK506，另6例治疗方案不变，结果转换药物者肝功能恢复正常的时间明显短于未转换者（P〈0．01），且治疗1～2周时的丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶和胆红素总量的水平也明显低于未转换者（P＜0．05，P＜0．01）。结论 与CsA相比，乙型肝炎病毒携带者肾移植术后应用FK506可降低肝功能损害的发生率，减少乙型肝炎复发。     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at three years

METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus (TAC) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC + azathioprine (AZA), or cyclosporine (Neoral; CsA) + MMF. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function (DGF). Patients were followed-up for 3 years. RESULTS: The results at 3 years corroborate and extend the findings of the 2-year results. Patients with DGF treated with TAC+MMF experienced an increase in 3-year allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (84.1% vs. 49.9%, P=0.02). Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing TAC exhibited numerically superior kidney function when compared with CsA. During the 3 years, new-onset insulin dependence occurred in 6, 3, and 11 patients in the TAC+MMF, CsA+MMF, and TAC+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients randomized to TAC+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF as compared with those who received CsA+MMF. CONCLUSION: All three immunosuppressive regimens provided excellent safety and efficacy. However, the best results overall were achieved with TAC+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients with DGF. In patients who experienced DGF, graft survival was better at 3 years in those patients receiving TAC in combination with either MMF or AZA as compared with the patients receiving CsA with MMF.     

Influence of Co-Medication with Sirolimus or Cyclosporine on Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics in Kidney Transplantation

The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA)--the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)--is significantly influenced by co-medications. The impact of sirolimus on daily MPA exposure, however, has not been investigated so far. As a part of the study aimed at investigating the efficacy of Campath-1H induction therapy in a steroid-free regimen in kidney transplantation, MPA plasma levels were serially measured in 21 patients treated with low-dose sirolimus (SRL) or low-dose CsA both in addition to low-dose MMF over 12 months post-operatively. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were compared at month 6 and 12 post-surgery. Mean dose-adjusted MPA trough levels were 4.4-fold higher in patients on combined SRL and MMF than in those given CsA and MMF. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that mean MPA C(max) and T(max) were comparable in the two groups, while mean MPA AUC(0-12) was higher in SRL than CsA treated patients. The pharmacokinetic profile of SRL- but not of CsA-group showed a second peak consistent with the enterohepatic recirculation of MPA. These findings suggest that SRL and CsA have different effects on MPA metabolism and/or excretion eventually affecting its immunosuppressive property and/or toxicity. CsA, but not SRL, inhibits MPA enterohepatic recirculation, reducing MPA daily exposure.     

CYP3A4 and P-Glycoprotein Activity in Healthy Controls and Transplant Patients on Cyclosporin vs. Tacrolimus vs. Sirolimus

This study aimed to determine the impact of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin A (CsA), tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus (Rapa) on the in vivo activity of both intestinal and hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (PGP) in renal transplant patients. The activity of these four elimination pathways was measured by the recently validated intravenous (iv) and per oral (po)14C erythromycin breath and urine test. In addition, overall hepatic P450 activity was measured by the (13)C aminopyrin breath test. Three groups of stable renal transplant patients on maintenance therapy with corticosteroids (CS) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus either CsA or FK506 or Rapa were examined. A significant increase in intestinal CYP3A4 activity and a significant decrease in hepatic and intestinal PGP activity was seen in patients on CsA in comparison with those on FK506 or Rapa (p < 0.01). A similar analysis in six healthy volunteers at baseline and after intake of CsA, FK506 and Rapa confirmed the results seen in the patients. There was no difference in CYP3A4 and PGP activity in the patients taking either FK506 or Rapa and healthy controls. These data suggest that a different pattern of drug interactions might be expected in patients treated with CsA vs. FK506/Rapa.     

Dyslipidemia during sirolimus therapy in patients after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Sirolimus (SRL) is an immunosuppressive agent of potential benefit in clinical liver transplantation (LTX). One of the major side effects of SRL is hyperlipidemia, which is reported in up to 44% of patients. In this report, we describe the lipid profiles of 20 stable liver transplant recipients who received SRL for immunosuppression. METHODS: The study group received SRL in combination with tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The control group was administered calcineurin inhibitor (CI) and MMF. Fasting serum cholesterol level, high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) were measured regularly. Furthermore, the total cholesterol/HDL ratio and the LDL/HDL ratio were evaluated. Diabetes and hypertension were monitored as well. RESULTS: In the SRL group, hypercholesterolemia was found in three patients (15%) and hypertriglyceridemia in two patients (10%). There was no marked difference from the control group, although a higher association of SRL with hyperlipidemia was described in the literature. Furthermore, HDL and LDL levels were similar in both groups, as well as total cholesterol/HDL ratio and LDL/HDL ratio. Diabetes and hypertension had a similar incidence in both the groups. Thus, there was no difference concerning the cardiovascular atherosclerosis risk between the immunosuppressive protocol with SRL or with CI. DISCUSSION: The results of our retrospective study demonstrated that the immunosuppressive regimen can potentially influence the incidence of hyperlipidemia in patients after LTX. SRL in combination with tacrolimus and/or MMF had no higher incidence of hyperlipidemia than CI and MMF. The combination of immunosuppressive therapy with low dose and low levels of each immunosuppressive agent could decrease the risk of atherosclerosis and its complications in long-term survivors after LTX.