Non-ulcer dyspepsia and peptic ulcer: the distribution in a population and their relation to risk factors.

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of non-ulcer dyspepsia and a possible connection to peptic ulcer disease is debated. This paper discusses this problem in a population based study. AIMS: The relation between non-ulcer dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease was explored by the distribution in the general population and their associations to demographic, lifestyle, and psychological factors. METHODS: All inhabitants of a community aged 20-69 years received a questionnaire concerning abdominal complaints, health, lifestyle, diet, and social conditions. Reports on peptic ulcer were verified with medical records. Dyspeptic subjects and matched healthy, non-dyspeptic controls were endoscoped in a blinded procedure. SUBJECTS: Of 2027 persons invited, 1802 (88.9%) returned the questionnaire from which dyspeptic subjects and controls were identified. Of 782 subjects invited to endoscopy, 309 dyspeptic and 310 control subjects (79.2%), participated. RESULTS: Men reported dyspepsia (30.4%) and peptic ulcer (8.7%) more often than women (24.1% and 5.2%, respectively). Non-ulcer dyspepsia was frequent (between 10.6% and 17.2%) in both sexes and age groups up to 60 years, with a lower frequency in both men and women above this age (3.0% and 6.8%). Non-ulcer dyspepsia was associated with having a family history of dyspepsia and of peptic ulcer and the use of tranquillisers. Nearly one third of dyspeptic persons above the age of 40 years had peptic ulcer, but peptic ulcer prevalence was low under this age. Peptic ulcer was associated with a family history of peptic ulcer, smoking, and daily life stress, and also with poor living conditions during childhood, frequent recurrence of herpes labialis, conditions that were associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: Non-ulcer dyspepsia and peptic ulcer have different patterns of relations to lifestyle, social, and psychological factors. The results perhaps support the hypothesis of peptic ulcer being an infectious disease in contrast with non-ulcer dyspepsia.     

NSAID-associated dyspepsia and ulcers: a prospective cohort study in primary care

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause dyspeptic complaints and lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The true incidence of these side effects in the everyday situation remains uncertain. We therefore investigated as to how often patients on NSAIDs in the primary care setting must be expected to develop troublesome dyspepsia and/or ulcers in the upper gastrointestinal tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Admitted to the study were consecutive patients requiring NSAID treatment for at least 2 weeks, who were free of treatment-requiring dyspeptic symptoms, and who were not receiving any prophylactic co-medication. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment with a NSAID, a standardized questionnaire and endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were obtained. RESULTS: 104 patients (median age 53 years, 91 women) were recruited to the study. Four patients had to be excluded for protocol violations. NSAID treatment was applied mainly with diclofenac (n = 67), followed by ibuprofen (n = 22) and rofecoxib (n = 9). The main indication was degenerative complaints affecting the vertebral column and joints. Under treatment, 35% of the patients developed troublesome dyspepsia that required treatment. The frequency of dyspepsia was independent of the duration of NSAID use. Ulcer prevalence was 16% (duodenal ulcer: n = 5; gastric ulcer: n = 11; cardiac ulcer: n = 1). Relevant epigastric pain was experienced more frequently by ulcer patients than those with no ulcer (35 vs. 18%, p = n.s.), but their overall symptom frequency was no higher than in the latter. Predictors for the development of ulcer were smoking (odds ratio 5.11 [1.59-16.48]), regular use of alcohol (odds ratio 4.49 [1.34-15.07]) and duration of treatment less than 1 month (odds ratio 4.95 [1.06-23.09]). No ulcer complications occurred during the period under observation. Overall, 44% of the patients developed troublesome dyspepsia and/or ulcer. CONCLUSION: Primary care patients with an average risk profile frequently develop dyspeptic symptoms requiring treatment, and ulcers while on NSAIDs. Patients who developed an ulcer were not identifiable on the basis of symptoms or risk factors.     

Comparison of coffee intake and coffee-induced symptoms in patients with duodenal ulcer, nonulcer dyspepsia, and normal controls

Coffee and decaffeinated coffee stimulate acid secretion. In addition, many patients experience dyspepsia after coffee ingestion. Therefore, coffee is often prohibited by physicians in patients with peptic diseases. However, the association between peptic disease and symptoms remains unclear. This study compares coffee intake and the induction of symptoms by coffee in patients with duodenal ulcer disease, nonulcer dyspepsia, and normal controls. We have studied the coffee drinking habits of 58 duodenal ulcer patients, 55 nonulcer dyspepsia patients, and 55 normal controls. The use of coffee on a daily basis was not significantly different between duodenal ulcer patients (64%) and controls (56%), or between nonulcer dyspepsia patients (55%) and controls. There was also no difference between the three groups in the use of decaffeinated coffee, the number of cups per day, the method of preparation, the length of time of coffee use, or any change in coffee intake in the previous year. The intake of tea, caffeinated carbonated beverages, and aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was also similar in the three groups. The duodenal ulcer patients were more likely to be cigarette smokers (45%) than either the controls (16%) or the nonulcer dyspepsia patients (24%). Daily alcohol intake was not significantly different in the three groups. The prevalence of coffee induction of dyspeptic symptoms was similar in duodenal ulcer patients (29%) and controls (22%), but was much more common in nonulcer dyspepsia patients (53%) than in controls (22%), p = 0.0036. In conclusion, there was no difference in coffee intake between patients with duodenal ulcer, nonulcer dyspepsia, or normal controls. However, patients with nonulcer dyspepsia, but not duodenal ulcer, were more likely to experience dyspeptic symptoms after coffee ingestion.     

Dyspepsia, Helicobacter pylori, and peptic ulcer in a randomly selected population in India.

There seems to be a worldwide geographic variation in the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease, although there are few reliable population based studies. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in a community in southern India and to evaluate the relationship between dyspeptic symptoms, Helicobacter pylori infection, gastritis, and peptic ulcer disease. A sample population was selected randomly from a rural monastic settlement in southern India. Subjects were interviewed using a standardised symptom and demography questionnaire then underwent upper endoscopy and antral biopsy for histology and CLO rapid urease test. Altogether 197 subjects from a population of 1499 (13.1%) were studied. All were male monks and ethnically Tibetan. The median age was 28 years (range: 21-81). None smoked or took NSAIDs. The six month period prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms was 68.5%. Current symptoms were present in 58.9% of subjects. Dyspepsia was more common in subjects aged 40 years or younger (p < 0.0001). H pylori was detected in 77.2% subjects. There was no association between dyspepsia and the presence of H pylori or histological gastritis, although there was a strong correlation between symptoms and ulcer (p < 0.003). The point prevalence of active peptic ulcer was 6.6% (13/197). All ulcers detected were either prepyloric or pyloroduodenal in location. A further 6.6% of subjects had definite evidence of scarring or deformity indicative of ulceration in the past. Subjects with past or present ulcers comprised 17.8% of dyspeptic subjects. H pylori was present in all subjects with active ulcers and in 12/13 of those with scarring. Dyspepsia, H pylori infection, gastritis, and peptic ulcer are all more common in this population than in those from developed countries. Ulcer disease, however, accounts for only a small proportion of subjects with symptoms and neither H pylori infection nor gastritis are significantly associated with the presence of dyspepsia.     

EDITORIAL: Obesity influence on dyspeptic symptoms

"Background: There is a high prevalence of dyspepsia and obesity in Mexican population. A relationship between obesity and dyspeptic symptoms has been proposed. Objective: To determine prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms in patients with normal weight, overweight and obesity. Methods: Prospective study on consecutive patients who attend for medical assistance for any reason in a first level medical center. Weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were measured. A validated questionnaire for dyspepsia was applied. Results: Three-hundred and twenty patients were included (61.6% women, n = 197). The mean patient age was 37 ± 14.4 years old. Mean BMI was 26.68 with 42.2% of patients (n = 135) overweight, 35.6% (n = 114) with normal weight and 22.2% (n = 71) were obese. Compared to patients with normal weight and overweight the obesity group showed a higher prevalence of gastritis symptoms, pain, stomachache, heartburn, a worst quality of life, and a higher frequency of medication intake. Patients with overweight presented a higher score in quality of life and treatment compared with normal weight patients. Conclusions: Obese patients showed a higher prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms compared to normal weight and overweight patients."     

Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori

Dyspepsia is defined as a chronic or recurrent pain centered in the upper abdomen. Dyspeptic symptoms have a high prevalence in the population and represent a common reason for patients to see a primary care physician. Therefore, dyspepsia displays a major health care burden and produces high socioeconomic costs. The etiology of dyspeptic symptoms is various and complex and has opened a wide spectrum of putative mechanisms. In a subset of patients dyspeptic symptoms are likely to originate from Helicobacter pylori infection. Population-based studies have demonstrated that H. pylori is detected more frequently in dyspeptic patients compared to controls. H. pylori eradication therapy gives modest but significant benefit in non-ulcer dyspepsia and leads to long-term symptom improvement. It also reduces the risk of developing peptic ulcer disease and other H. pylori-related gastric pathologies (i.e. atrophic gastritis, gastric cancer). The main therapeutic strategy for managing dyspepsia in patients under the age of 45 years is 'test and treat'. H. pylori eradication is recommended in patients with dyspepsia and no other gastroduodenal abnormalities than H. pylori induced gastritis. In patients presenting with alarm features a prompt upper endoscopy should be performed to exclude peptic ulcer disease, esophageal and gastric malignancies or other more rare upper gastrointestinal diseases.     

Prevalence of acid reflux in functional dyspepsia and its association with symptom profile

AIM: A subset of functional dyspepsia patients respond to acid suppressive therapy, but the prevalence of non-erosive reflux disease in functional dyspepsia and its relevance to symptoms have never been established. The aim of the present study was to study 24 hour pH monitoring in consecutive functional dyspepsia patients. METHODS: A total of 247 patients with dyspeptic symptoms (166 women, mean age 44 (SEM 1) year), with a negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and without dominant symptoms of heartburn participated in the study. In all patients, the severity of dyspeptic symptoms and the presence of heartburn was assessed by a questionnaire and a 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring study was performed. All patients underwent a gastric emptying breath test and in 113 a gastric barostat study was performed. RESULTS: Abnormal pH monitoring (acid exposure >5% of time) was found in 58 patients (23%). Of 21 patients with a positive heartburn questionnaire, 76% had pathological pH monitoring, while this was the case in only 18.5% of patients with a negative heartburn questionnaire. Demographic characteristics and the prevalence of other pathophysiological mechanisms did not differ between heartburn negative patients with normal or abnormal acid exposure. Pathological acid exposure in heartburn negative patients was associated with the presence of epigastric pain (65 v 84%, p<0.005) and of moderate or severe pain (48 v 69%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Pathological oesophageal acid exposure is only present in a subset of heartburn negative functional dyspepsia patients, which are characterised by a higher prevalence of epigastric pain.     

Controlled Clinical Trial of Treatment with Cimetidine for Non-ulcer Dyspepsia

ABSTRACT The effect of cimetidine (1 g daily) and placebo was studied in a controlled clinical trial comprising 50 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia in whom an organic abnormality responsible for the dyspeptic symptoms was not disclosed by a standardized and extensive examination programme. Reduction of symptoms occurred in 13 (54%) out of 24 patients treated with cimetidine and in 16 (62%) out of 26 treated with placebo. The difference was insignificant, as were the alterations in the individual dyspeptic symptoms between the groups. Only 6 patients (25%) on cimetidine and 8 (31%) on placebo treatment had a total relief of symptoms. Of these, all cimetidine-treated patients remained free from symptoms during the successive 3-month observation period, while the dyspeptic symptoms relapsed in 3 (38%) placebo-treated patients. Subsequent resumption of placebo treatment reduced the symptoms in all 3 patients, but only one became free from symptoms. Cimetidine does not seem to be superior to placebo in the treatment of non-ulcer dyspepsia in patients without any previous history of ulcer or without any sign on endoscopy of an active or previous ulcer disease.     

The value of alarm features in identifying organic causes of dyspepsia.

The unaided clinical diagnosis of dyspepsia is of limited value in separating functional dyspepsia from clinically relevant organic causes of dyspepsia (gastric and esophageal malignancies, peptic ulcer disease and complicated esophagitis). The identification of one or more alarm features, such as weight loss, dysphagia, signs of gastrointestinal bleeding, an abdominal mass or age over 45 years may help identify patients with a higher risk of organic disease. This review summarizes the frequency of alarm symptoms in dyspeptic patients in different settings (such as the community, primary care and specialist clinics). The prevalence of alarm features in patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal malignancy or peptic ulcer disease is described. The probability of diagnosing clinically relevant upper gastrointestinal disease in patients presenting with alarm features and other risk factors is discussed. Alarm features such as age, significant weight loss, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, signs of bleeding and dysphagia may help stratify dyspeptic patients and help optimize the use of endoscopy resources.     

Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori in Japanese employees with and without ulcer history

In a Dutch working population, the apparent association between dyspeptic symptoms and Helicobacter pylori infection was found to be entirely due to subjects with an ulcer history. In general populations with a much higher prevalence of H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease, such as in Japan, the relationship between dyspepsia and H. pylori has yet to be clarified. A questionnaire on ulcer history and dyspeptic symptoms during the preceding 3 month period was obtained from apparently healthy Japanese employees who underwent a periodic medical examination. In addition, serum samples were analysed for anti-H. pylori IgG antibodies. A total of 196 men and 35 women, aged 23–71 years, participated in the study. Seven women (20%) and 49 men (25%) had a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Among 41 subjects with verified duodenal (26) and/or gastric (17) ulcer, 95% were H. pylori positive while 32% had had frequent dyspeptic symptoms in the 3 months prior to the study (29% of the 35 men and 50% of the 6 women). Among the 147 men and 28 women without an ulcer history, the 3 month period prevalence of frequent dyspepsia was 14 and 32%, respectively. The rate of H. pylori positivity was 80% in non-ulcer dyspeptics and 68% in all other non-ulcer subjects (95% confidence intervals: 61–92 and 61–76%, respectively). Significant differences in symptoms between H. pylori positive and negative subjects could not be detected, neither in the whole population nor in the non-ulcer group. In conclusion, in this Japanese working population, no association was found between dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori infection, irrespective of the inclusion of subjects with a peptic ulcer history.     

6 Role of gastric acid in the aetiology of dyspeptic disease and dyspepsia

The main diseases associated with dyspepsia are peptic ulcer disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-ulcer dyspepsia. Increased gastric acid secretion is a characteristic of most duodenal ulcer patients and of a small minority of non-ulcer dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Although acid secretion is normal in most gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, the condition is mainly the result of excess exposure of the distal oesophagus to acid refluxing from the stomach. Increased mucosal sensitivity to acid is involved in the aetiology of dyspeptic symptoms in the majority of patients with peptic ulcer disease and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and in a minority of non-ulcer dyspepsia subjects. Gastric acid, therefore, plays an important role in both the aetiology of dyspeptic diseases and in the aetiology of dyspeptic symptoms.     

What makes the dyspeptic patient feel ill? A cross sectional survey of functional health status, Helicobacter pylori infection, and psychological distress in dyspeptic patients in general practice

BACKGROUND: Dyspepsia is prevalent in about 30% of the general population in Europe, but only 25% of people with complaints consult their general practitioner. AIMS: To study the relation between the severity of dyspeptic complaints and the health status of patients presenting to the general practitioner; and the relation with patient characteristics, Helicobacter pylori infection, and psychological distress. METHODS: A cross sectional, general practice based survey of 360 unselected primary care dyspeptic patients from 92 general practices in The Netherlands was conducted. Symptom severity was measured using a validated symptom score, H pylori using a whole blood test, and psychological distress using the GHQ-12 test. Functional health status was assessed using the COOP/Wonca charts. RESULTS: Symptoms lasting more than three months and presence of relevant psychological distress were both associated with higher levels of dyspepsia. H pylori infection, frequency of symptoms, and age had no influence on dyspepsia severity. Severity of dyspepsia and psychological distress, but not H pylori infection or duration of symptoms, affected health status univariately. Dyspepsia correlated with general health, daily activities, and social activities. In logistic modelling, health status was far better predicted by psychological distress than by dyspepsia severity. CONCLUSION: The relation between dyspeptic symptom severity and health status is limited. H pylori infection relates neither to functional health status, nor to intensity of dyspepsia. Psychological distress is a major determinant of impaired health of dyspeptic patients in general practice and may be the clue to improvement of health status in many dyspeptic patients.     

Development and Validation of a Cross-Cultural Questionnaire to Evaluate Nonulcer Dyspepsia: The Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire (PADYQ)

Despite its high prevalence, nonulcer dyspepsia is still difficult to study, due to the lack of adequate tools to measure significant outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a symptom-focused, disease-specific questionnaire to evaluate patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. For that, the questionnaire was carefully written following widely accepted terminology, so as to facilitate translation and validation in other languages and cultures. The questionnaire was developed using Rome I terminology for symptoms, which were evaluated according to their intensity, duration, and frequency when applicable. Thirty-one patients with nonulcer dyspepsia, as well as 31 sex-and age-matched volunteers without digestive problems were used to assess the internal consistency, reproducibility, responsiveness, content validity, and discriminant validity of the questionnaire. Another 31 functional dyspeptic patients were enrolled for assessment of criterion validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.82. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the scores obtained 7 days apart was 0.86. The mean score obtained after 3 months of treatment was 16.4, vs. 23.03 at baseline (P = 0.001). Two blinded gastroenterologists agreed that the questionnaire adequately evaluated nonulcer dyspepsia. The median symptoms score for controls was 0, vs. 22.5 for dyspeptic patients (P = 0.001). An inverse correlation was observed between quality of life and dyspeptic symptoms (R = -0.28, P = 0.026). The proposed questionnaire has high degrees of both reproducibility and responsiveness. As this questionnaire was based on Rome I International Consensus terminology, it is expected that it will be easy to translate and validate.     

Symptomatic benefit 1-3 years after H. pylori eradication in ulcer patients: impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection markedly reduces the recurrence of duodenal and gastric ulcers. However, there is little information regarding its efficacy in resolving dyspeptic symptoms in ulcer patients. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of eradicating H. pylori infection on dyspeptic symptoms in ulcer patients. The secondary aim was to identify predictors of symptomatic response to H. pylori eradication. METHODS: A total of 97 dyspeptic patients with active duodenal and/or gastric ulceration associated with H. pylori infection and unrelated to NSAID use had the severity and character of their dyspeptic symptoms measured before and again 1-3 yr after H. pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: Pretreatment, the median dyspepsia score was 12 (4-16). Posttreatment, 55% of those eradicated of H. pylori had resolution of dyspepsia (score <2) compared with 18% of those not eradicated of the infection (95% CI for difference, 11-62%). Of the ulcer patients 31% had symptoms and/or endoscopic evidence of coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at initial presentation and this influenced the symptomatic response to eradication of H. pylori. Of the 22 patients with heartburn or acid reflux as the predominant presenting symptom, but no endoscopic esophagitis, only 27% experienced resolution of dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication, compared with 68% of the 59 without those as predominant symptoms (95% CI for difference, 18-63%). Only one of the five patients with coexisting endoscopic esophagitis at initial presentation experienced resolution of dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication. Symptomatic benefit was unrelated to time lapsed since the infection was eradicated. Only three of 50 subjects developed de novo GERD symptoms after eradication of H. pylori, whereas 21 of 36 subjects experienced resolution of GERD symptoms after eradication of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of ulcer patients have symptoms and/or signs of coexisting GERD at initial presentation and this reduces the symptomatic benefit from H. pylori eradication. However, we have found no evidence that eradicating H. pylori induces de novo GERD symptoms in ulcer patients.     

Gastric hypochlorhydria is associated with an exacerbation of dyspeptic symptoms in female patients

Background

Gender and gastric acid have been suggested to be independently involved in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia, but the interrelationship among gender, dyspeptic symptoms, and gastric acid secretion remains to be evaluated. We sought to explore this issue in dyspeptic patients.

Methods

A total of 89 outpatients (male, 36; mean age, 55.6 years) with dyspeptic symptoms were analyzed. The degree of dyspeptic symptoms was evaluated and scored using a symptom questionnaire consisting of 3 subcategories: dysmotility-related symptoms, reflux-related symptoms, and epigastric pain-related symptoms. Stimulated gastric acid secretion was directly measured using an endoscopic gastrin test.

Results

The total symptom scores and the epigastric pain-related symptom scores were significantly higher in female patients than in male patients. The dysmotility-related and reflux-related symptom scores were also higher, but not significantly, in the female patients. Multiple regression analysis of age, gender, habitual drinking, smoking, Helicobacter pylori infection, and gastric acid secretion revealed that gender and gastric hypochlorhydria, defined as less than 2.1 mEq/10 min in the endoscopic gastrin test, were significantly associated with higher dyspeptic symptom scores. The total scores and the dysmotility-related scores were significantly higher in the patients with gastric hypochlorhydria than in those with gastric non-hypochlorhydria, and this difference was found to be present only in females.

Conclusions

Gastric hypochlorhydria in female dyspeptic patients may be involved in the exacerbation of dyspeptic symptoms. Differences in the responsiveness to gastric hypochlorhydria between males and females may be partly responsible for the gender differences in the prevalence and severity of dyspeptic symptoms.     

Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspepsia

Dyspepsia is defined as a persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort, localised in the upper abdomen, which may or may not be related to meals. Its prevalence in the general population is extraordinarily high (20-40%). Several pathological conditions can provoke dyspepsia, although non ulcer dyspepsia is the main cause. The relationships between Helicobacter pylori and non ulcer dyspepsia are discussed, namely the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the efficacy of its eradication in non ulcer dyspepsia. The management of dyspeptic patients in the community is analysed according to the Maastricht Consensus of 1996. Our opinion is that, in Helicobacter pylori-positive dyspeptic patients, after a careful investigation with exclusion of other organic diseases, the bacterium should be eradicated.     

The Hong Kong index of dyspepsia: a validated symptom severity questionnaire for patients with dyspepsia

AIM: Locally validated symptom questionnaires are essential instruments in dyspepsia research. A symptom score for Chinese dyspeptics was developed. Multiple aspects of validity and reliability were assessed. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with endoscopy-negative dyspepsia and 65 healthy controls were presented with a list of 24 previously determined common abdominal symptoms and asked to rate the severity in a five point Likert scale. Comprehensibility and relevance of symptoms were assessed. The questionnaire was administered 3 h later to assess for reproducibility. A locally validated Short Form-36 quality-of-life questionnaire was also administered. Cisapride 5 mg thrice daily was prescribed to dyspeptic patients but not to the controls. The dyspepsia symptom and SF-36 questionnaires were repeated after 3 weeks for patients under treatment. Global change in symptoms and the need for further medical care were assessed. Concept, content, construct and criterion validity, consistency and reproducibility of the dyspepsia symptom questionnaire were assessed. RESULTS: All items were considered comprehensible by more than 90% of subjects. Relevance of individual symptoms to dyspeptic patients ranged from 10.8-76.9%. Twelve items were selected by logistic regression to account for most of the differences between control and dyspeptic patients. Test-retest reproducibility and internal consistency were good with the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.90. A cut-off score of equal to or greater than 16 was determined to discriminate between controls and dyspeptic patients. The dyspepsia score correlated negatively with all domains of the SF-36 quality of life scale except physical functioning. The dyspepsia questionnaire also discriminated between patients who reported a subjective improvement in symptoms and those who reported no change or worsening. CONCLUSIONS: The dyspepsia symptom index was easy to understand, internally consistent and reproducible. It predicted global symptom change, and the symptom severity scores correlated negatively with quality of life.     

Prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of uninvestigated dyspepsia in the Czech Republic

OBJECTIVE: There are no data on the epidemiology of dyspepsia in Central Europe. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia in a representative sample of the Czech population. METHODS: A total of 2509 persons, aged 5-100 years, randomly selected from 30 012 individuals in the general population, entered this multicentre, prospective, questionnaire-based epidemiological study. RESULTS: We found a 17% prevalence of long-lasting (>12 months) dyspeptic symptoms in the general population. Two subgroups were distinguished: (i) persons with dyspepsia as the only one long-lasting symptom and themselves feeling otherwise healthy (9%), mostly among younger patients (subgroup A); and (ii) patients with dyspepsia as part of the complex of previously recognized diseases (8%), mostly in older patients (subgroup B). The prevalence of dyspepsia was significantly higher among women. The excess cases of dyspepsia among the highly educated seemed to be cases of dyspepsia of subgroup A, and the higher prevalence of dyspepsia among the lower social classes was largely dyspepsia of subgroup B. Being a widow/widower had a significant effect on the risk of self-reported dyspepsia among 25-64-year-olds. No association between Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspepsia was found. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia in the Czech Republic is comparable with data from other European countries. Clearly distinct subgroups of dyspeptic patients exist that should be further studied.     

Duodenal ulcer hemorrhage with and without dyspepsia

To clarify the clinical significance of dyspepsia in patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer, we studied 298 patients prospectively. Ages of patients ranged from 16 to 81 yr (mean 45.9). There were 244 (82%) dyspeptic and 54 (18%) nondyspeptic patients. In the dyspeptic group, significantly more patients were taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In the nondyspeptic group, there was a higher percentage of patients with duodenal bulb deformity (p less than 0.005), which deformity was related to previous peptic ulcer disease. The age, sex, past history of dyspepsia or bleeding, consumption of alcohol and cigarettes, and the hospital course of the two groups of patients did not differ significantly. Our results show that the clinical course of duodenal ulcer hemorrhage is not significantly different in patients with or without dyspepsia, and indicate that bleeding and dyspepsia probably are two independent presentations in the natural course of the disease. The significance of the correlation between dyspepsia and duodenal bulb deformity is discussed.     

Fluctuation in dyspepsia subgroups over time. A three-year follow-up of patients consulting general practice for dyspepsia

BACKGROUND: General practitioners base their treatment and investigation on the symptoms presented by the patients. Subgroups of dyspepsia have been defined in order to guide management. AIM: To study prospectively changes over time in the presentation of dyspepsia according to different subtypes in a general practitioner population. SUBJECTS: Patients consulting the general practitioner because of dyspeptic complaints. METHODS: A random sample of general practitioner patients consulting with different dyspepsia subtypes (ulcer-like, reflux-like, dysmotility-like, uncharacteristic and relapsing dyspepsia) were studied three years after the initial consultation by postal questionnaires to the general practitioners (obtaining information from the patient records) and to the patients (obtaining self-reported symptoms during twelve months). The subtype of dyspepsia at baseline was compared to the subtype in the patient questionnaire. RESULTS: Between 20 and 34% of the patients reported no dyspepsia after three years, with so significant difference between the subtypes. Changes from one subtype to another were common, ulcer-like and reflux-like often changed into dysmotility-like dyspepsia. Dysmotility-like dyspepsia was significantly more stable over time. Patients with more than one episode of dyspepsia changed subtype significantly less. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who presented with dyspepsia to the general practitioner still reported symptoms three years later. Few patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia changed subtype over time, whereas changes from one subtype to another were common in other subtypes. This implies that dyspeptic patients could end up having dysmotility-like complaints possibly due to the lack of effective treatment for this condition, compared to the other dyspepsia subtypes.