Alprazolam, a benzodiazepine, blunts but does not abolish the ACTH and cortisol response to hexarelin, a GHRP, in obese patients

GH secretagogues (GHS) act on specific receptors at the pituitary and hypothalamic level and possess potent GH-releasing activity but also stimulate prolactin (PRL), ACTH and cortisol (F) secretion. However, hyperactivity of the HPA axis in obesity has been reported. The objective of this study was to clarify the endocrine activity of GHS in obesity. In nine obese patients (obese OB), 9 F, age, (34.8 +/- 3.7 y, body mass index (BMI), 35.0 +/- 2.2 kg/m2; WHR, 0.9 +/- 0.02), 14 controls (normal subjects, NS), 14 F, 30.4 +/- 0.9 y, 20.0 +/- 0.4 kg/m2), we studied the ACTH, F and GH responses to hexarelin (HEX, 2.0 microg/kg), a peptidyl GHS, alone and preceded by alprazolam (ALP, 0.02 mg/kg), and a benzodiazepine which has an inhibitory effect on corticotroph secretion. The HEX-induced ACTH response in OB was higher than that in n.s., but this difference did not attain statistical significance. In n.s. the HEX-induced ACTH response was abolished by ALP (P < 0.03) which, however, only blunted that in OB (P < 0.02). The GH response to HEX in OB was lower (P < 0.02) than that in n.s.. ALP blunted the GH response to HEX in n.s. (P < 0.03) while it did not modify that in OB. The GABAergic activation by alprazolam abolishes the ACTH response to hexarelin in normal subjects, while it only blunts that in obese subjects. Moreover, alprazolam blunts the GH response to hexarelin in normal but not in obese subjects. Thus, obese patients show partial refractoriness to the inhibitory effect of alprazolam on both corticotroph and somatotroph function.     

Interaction between glucagon and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans

OBJECTIVE: Glucagon administration stimulates both somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in humans, although this happens only if glucagon is administered by the intramuscular route and not by the intravenous route. On the other hand, GH secretagogues (GHS) strongly stimulate GH and also possess ACTH-releasing activity. DESIGN AND METHODS: To clarify the mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effects of both glucagon and GHS on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion, we studied the GH, ACTH and cortisol responses to glucagon (GLU, 0.017 mg/kg i.m.) and Hexarelin, a peptidyl GHS (HEX, 2.0 microg/kg i.v.) given alone or in combination in 6 normal young volunteers (females, aged 26-32 years, body mass index 19.7-22.5 kg/m). RESULTS: GLU administration elicited a clear increase in GH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-S.E.M.: 11.6+/-3.4 vs 3. 3+/-0.7 microg/l, P<0.02), ACTH (11.6+/-3.3 vs 4.1+/-0.3 pmol/l, P<0. 02) and cortisol (613.5+/-65.6 vs 436.9+/-19.3 nmol/l, P<0.05) levels. HEX induced a marked increase in GH levels (55.7+/-19.8 vs 3. 7+/-1.9 microg/l, P<0.005) and also significant ACTH (5.7+/-1.1 vs 3. 4+/-0.6 pmol/l, P<0.01) and cortisol (400.2+/-31.4 vs 363.4+/-32.2 nmol/l, P<0.05) responses. The GH area under the curve (AUC) after HEX was clearly higher than after GLU (1637.3+/-494.0 vs 479.1+/-115. 7 microg/l/120 min, P<0.04) while HEX and GLU coadministration had a true synergistic effect on GH release (3243.8+/-687.5 microg/l/120 min, P<0.02). The ACTH and cortisol AUCs after HEX were lower (P<0. 02) than those after GLU (208.3+/-41.3 vs 426.3+/-80.9 pmol/l/120 min and 18 874.5+/-1626.1 vs 28 338.5+/-2430.7 nmol/l/120 min respectively). The combined administration of HEX and GLU had an effect which was less than additive on both ACTH (564.02+/-76.5 pmol/l/120 min) and cortisol (35 424.6+/-5548.1 nmol/l/120 min) secretion. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the intramuscular administration of glucagon releases less GH but more ACTH and cortisol than Hexarelin. The combined administration of glucagon and Hexarelin has a true synergistic effect on somatotroph secretion but a less than additive effect on corticotroph secretion; these findings suggest that these stimuli act via different mechanisms to stimulate somatotrophs while they could have a common action on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis.     

Recombinant human IGF-I does not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in humans

An inhibitory influence of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been hypothesized. In fact, it has been reported that the rhGH (recombinant human GH)-induced IGF-I increase inhibits both cortisol and GH response to MK-0677, a non-peptidyl GH secretagogue in animals. The aim of this study was to further clarify the inhibitory role, if any, of IGF-I on corticotroph function. We studied the effect of rhIGF-I (recombinant human IGF-I; 20 microg/kg s.c. at -180 min) or placebo on the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (human CRH; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) or hexarelin (HEX; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a peptidyl GHS, in normal young women. The effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to HEX was also studied. The subjects were six normal young women [age: 26-35 yr; body mass index (BMI): 19-23 kg/m2] in their early follicular phase. The results showed that after s.c. rhIGF-I administration, circulating IGF-I levels increased approximately 77%, peaking at -60 min and persisting similar up to +120 min. The mean ACTH, cortisol and GH concentrations did not change from -180 to 0 min when evaluated after both placebo or rhIGF-I. CRH and HEX induced similar ACTH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 47.5+/-10.9 vs 21.3+/-3.0 pg/ml and 30.3+/-6.9 vs 19.2+/-3.8 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.04) and cortisol responses (177.5+/-5.4 vs 109.3+/-10.3 microg/l and 149.4+/-12.3 vs 119.8+/-16.4 microg/l, respectively, p<0.04). RhIGF-I pretreatment did not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (46.0+/-13.8 pg/ml and 181.1+/-16.9 microg/l, respectively) as well as those to HEX (28.8+/-5.0 pg/ml and 144.1+/-16.2 microg/l, respectively). On the other hand, the GH response to HEX was clearly reduced by rhIGF-I (23.9+/-4.7 vs 64.7+/-14.8 microg/l, p<0.05). Our findings show that rhIGF-I-induced increase of circulating IGF-I levels exerts negative feedback action on somatotroph secretion, while it does not modify the corticotroph and the adrenal responsiveness to CRH or hexarelin.     

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on the growth hormone (gh) response to GH-releasing hormone in obesity

Circulating GH levels are reduced in obesity due to true reduction of the 24-h GH production rate. GH insufficiency in obesity might reflect neuroendocrine abnormalities and/or alterations in peripheral hormones and metabolic factors. The somatotroph response to provocative stimuli including GHRH is markedly blunted in obese patients. However, the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obesity shows also peculiar refractoriness to the inhibitory effect of glucose load. In this present study we aimed at verifying the effect of low dose rhIGF-I (20 microgram/kg, sc, at 0 min) on the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv, at 180 min) in obesity. With this goal in mind, six obese women with abdominal adiposity [OB; age (mean +/- SEM), 32.3 +/- 4.4 yr; body mass index, 32.8 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] were studied. The effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) administration on circulating total IGF-I, insulin, and glucose levels were also evaluated. The results in OB were compared with those recorded in age-matched lean women (NW; age, 28.3 +/- 1.2 yr; body mass index, 20.1 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2)), in whom the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I had already been shown. Basal IGF-I levels in OB were similar to those in NW (199.7 +/- 33.3 vs. 274.4 +/- 25.3 microgram/L). The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from 0-180 min) in OB was lower than that in NW (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.8 microgram/L; P = NS). Administration of GHRH induced a GH response in OB lower than that in NW (area under the curve from 180-270 min, 576.5 +/- 137.5 vs. 1315.9 +/- 189.9 microgram/L.min; P < 0.02). Administration of rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels in both groups to the same percent extent (326.8 +/- 28.3 and 420.3 +/- 26.5 microgram/L in OB and NW, respectively). rhIGF-I administration inhibited the GH response to GHRH in OB (240.1 +/- 99.6 microgram/L; P < 0.05) as well as in NW (730.2 +/- 288.1 microgram/L; P < 0.05), although it failed to lower the mean GH concentration over 3 h in either OB or NW. After rhIGF-I the GH response to GHRH in OB was slight and was still lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW; in fact, the percent decreases were similar in both groups (44.21 +/- 14.06 and 48.21 +/- 13.95 microgram/L, in OB and NW, respectively). The mean insulin (107.1 +/- 21.9 and 36.8 +/- 7.2 pmol/L), but not glucose (4.0 +/- 0.3 and 4.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/L), levels calculated over 270 min, were higher (P = 0.005) in OB than in NW; rhIGF-I administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels in either group. Our study shows that the sc administration of a low rhIGF-I dose inhibits the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obese as well as in normal subjects, indicating that somatotroph sensitivity to the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I is preserved in obesity.     

Glucagon Is an ACTH Secretagogue as Effective as hCRH after Intramuscolar Administration while It Is Ineffective When Given Intravenously in Normal Subjects

It is widely accepted that glucagon stimulates GH, ACTH and cortisol release in humans, though the mechanisms underlying these effects are unclear. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the stimulatory effect of intramuscolar (im) and intravenous (iv) glucagon (GLU) administration on ACTH, cortisol (F) and GH release in normal adult subjects and to compare its effect on hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis with that of hCRH. To this goal, in 6 normal young women (26–32 yrs, 50–58 kg) we studied the ACTH and F responses to either im or iv GLU (1 mg, approximately 0.017 mg/kg in subjects of 54.1 ± 1.6 kg) administration as well as to iv hCRH (2.0 g/kg) or placebo administration. The GH and glucose variations after GLU administration were also studied. Iv GLU did not modify the spontaneous decrease of ACTH and cortisol levels observed after placebo. Conversely, im GLU elicited clear-cut ACTH and F responses (peak vs baseline, mean ± SEM: 53.0 ± 15.2 vs 19.0 ± 1.5 pg/ml, p < 0.05 and 222.3 ± 23.8 vs 158.3 ± 7.0 g/l, p < 0.05) which were higher than those recorded after hCRH (28.1 ± 4.6 vs 17.4 ± 3.1 pg/ml, p < 0.02 and 182.7 ± 22.8 vs 114.8 ± 12.3 g/l p < 0.02), though this difference did not attain statistical significance. Also GH rise was recorded after im but not after iv GLU administration (11.6 ± 3.4 vs 3.3 ± 0.7 g/l, p < 0.05). Thirty min after both iv and im GLU administration glucose levels showed a similar increase followed by similar decrease. The intramuscular administration of GLU induced negligible side-effects in some subject (mild and transient nausea) which, on the contrary, were clear in all subjects after its intravenous administration (nausea, vomiting, tachicardia). In conclusion, glucagon per se is not an ACTH, cortisol and GH secretagogue. After intramuscular administration glucagon is a stimulus of HPA axis at least as effective as hCRH. The mechanisms underlying the ACTH, cortisol and GH responses to im glucagon unlikely include glucose variations or stress.     

Ghrelin does not mediate the somatotroph and corticotroph responses to the stimulatory effect of glucagon or insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in humans

OBJECTIVE: Acylated ghrelin, a gastric peptide, possesses a potent GH- but also significant ACTH/cortisol-releasing activity mediated by the activation of GH secretagogue receptors (GHS-R) at the hypothalamus-pituitary level. The physiological role of ghrelin in the control of somatotroph and corticotroph function is, however, largely unclear. Glucagon is known to induce a clear increase of GH, ACTH and cortisol levels in humans, at least after intramuscular administration. In fact, glucagon is considered to be a classical alternative to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT) for the combined evaluation of the function of GH and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. We aimed to clarify whether ghrelin mediate the GH and corticotroph responses to intramuscular glucagon or ITT, which has recently been reported able to induce a surprising ghrelin decrease. SUBJECTS: To this aim we enrolled six normal young male subjects [age (mean +/- SD): 29.0 +/- 8.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 21.9 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2)]. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied ghrelin, GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose levels after glucagon (GLU; 0.017 mg/kg intramuscularly), ITT (0.1 IU/kg insulin intravenously) or saline administration. RESULTS: Saline infusion was not followed by any significant variation in ghrelin, GH and glucose levels while ACTH and cortisol showed the expected spontaneous morning trend toward a decrease. GLU administration increased (P < 0.01) circulating GH, ACTH and cortisol as well as insulin and glucose levels. ITT induced an obvious increase (P < 0.01) of GH, ACTH and cortisol levels. The ITT-induced increases in GH and ACTH, but not cortisol, levels were higher (P < 0.01) than those after GLU. Circulating ghrelin levels were not modified by GLU. On the other hand, ghrelin levels underwent a transient reduction (P < 0.01) after insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin does not mediate the GH and ACTH responses to glucagon or to the ITT. In fact, ghrelin levels are not modified at all by glucagon and transiently decrease during the ITT. These findings support the assumption that ghrelin does not play a major role in the physiological control of somatotroph and corticotroph function.     

Neuroendocrine and metabolic effects of acute ghrelin administration in human obesity

Ghrelin stimulates appetite and plays a role in the neuroendocrine response to energy balance variations. Ghrelin levels are inversely associated with body mass index (BMI), increased by fasting and decreased by food intake, glucose load, insulin, and somatostatin. Ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, a condition of hyperinsulinism, reduced GH secretion, and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity. We studied the endocrine and metabolic response to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) in nine obese women [OB; BMI (mean +/- SD) 36.3 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] and seven normal women (NW; BMI 20.3 +/- 1.7 kg/m(2)). Basal ghrelin levels in NW were higher than in OB (P < 0.05). In NW, ghrelin increased (P < 0.05) GH, prolactin (PRL), ACTH, cortisol, and glucose levels but did not modify insulin. In OB, ghrelin increased (P < 0.01) GH, PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels. The GH response to ghrelin in OB was 55% lower (P < 0.02) than in NW, whereas the PRL, ACTH, and cortisol responses were similar. In OB, ghrelin increased glucose and reduced insulin (P < 0.05). Thus, obesity shows remarkable reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to ghrelin, suggesting that ghrelin hyposecretion unlikely explains the impairment of somatotroph function in obesity. On the other hand, in obesity ghrelin shows preserved influence on PRL, ACTH, and insulin secretion as well as in glucose levels.     

Effects of the combined administration of hexarelin, a synthetic peptidyl GH secretagogue, and hCRH on ACTH, cortisol and GH secretion in patients with Cushing's disease

Hexarelin (HEX) is a peptidyl GH secretagogue (GHS) which markedly stimulates GH release but, like other GHS, possesses also CNS-mediated ACTH- and cortisol-releasing activity. Interestingly, the stimulatory effect of HEX on ACTH and cortisol release is exaggerated and higher than that of hCRH in patients with Cushing's disease (CD). To further clarify the mechanisms by which HEX stimulates the activity of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in man, in 6 patients with CD (6 women, 38-68 yr old) and in 7 control subjects (CS, 7 women, 22-29 yr old) we studied the effects of HEX (2.0 microg/kg i.v.) and/or hCRH (2.0 microg/kg i.v.) on ACTH and cortisol (F) secretion. The GH responses to HEX alone and combined with hCRH were also studied in all subjects. Basal ACTH and F levels in CD were higher than in CS (66.3+/-5.1 vs 16.5+/-0.6 pg/ml and 217.8+/-18.5 vs 134.4+/-4.6 microg/l, respectively; p<0.02). In CS, the ACTH and F responses to HEX, evaluated as deltaAUC (mean+/-SE: 128.7+/-39.2 pg x min/ml and 328.5+/-93.2 microg x min/l, respectively) were lower, though not significantly, than those after hCRH (375.8+/-128.4 pg x min/ml and 1714.2+/-598.0 microg x min/l, respectively), though the peak ACTH and F responses to both stimuli were similar. The co-administration of HEX and hCRH had an additive effect on both ACTH (1189.6+/-237.2 pg x min/ml) and F secretion (3452.9+/-648.6 microg x min/l). In fact, the ACTH and F responses to HEX+/-hCRH were significantly higher (p<0.01) than those elicited by single stimuli. In CD, HEX induced ACTH and F responses (3603.8+/-970.7 pg x min/ml and 10955.9+/-6184.6 microg x min/l, respectively) clearly higher (p<0.002) than those in CS. The HEX-induced ACTH and F responses in CD were higher, though not significantly, than those recorded after hCRH (1432.7+/-793.5 pg x min/ml and 4832.7+/-2146.5 microg x min/l, respectively). On the other hand, the hCRH-induced ACTH and F responses in CD were similar to those in CS. In CD, the coadministration of HEX and hCRH had an additive effect on ACTH (8035.7+/-1191.1 pg x min/ml) but not on F (10985.4+/-3900.8 microg x min/l) secretion. In fact, the ACTH, but not the F response to HEX+hCRH was significantly higher (p<0.02) than that elicited by single stimuli. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that in patients with Cushing's disease as well as in subjects control Hexarelin and hCRH have an additive effect on ACTH secretion. Considering that, at least in humans, differently from hCRH, GHS have no interaction with AVP, our present findings further agree with the hypothesis that the ACTH-releasing activity of GHS is, at least partially, independent of CRH-mediated mechanisms.     

Obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome show a peculiar alteration of the corticotroph but not of the thyrotroph and lactotroph function

OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is strongly associated with obesity (OB) and is characterized by several changes in endocrine functions, e.g. GH/IGF-I axis, adrenal and thyroid activity. It is still unclear whether these alterations simply reflect overweight or include peculiar hypoxia-induced hormonal alterations. Hormonal evaluations have been generally performed in basal conditions but we have recently reported that OSAS is characterized by a more severe reduction of the GH releasable pool in comparison to simple obesity. We aimed to extend our evaluation of anterior pituitary function to corticotroph, thyrotroph and lactotroph secretion under dynamic testing in OSAS in comparison with simply obese and normal subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 15 male patients with OSAS [age, mean +/- SEM 43.5 +/- 1.6 years; body mass index (BMI) 39.2 +/- 3.1 kg/m2; apnoea/hypopnoea index, (AHI) 53.4 +/- 8.7], 15 male patients with simple obesity (OB, age 39.7 +/- 1.2 years; BMI 41.2 +/- 2.0 kg/m2; AHI 3.1 +/- 1.2 events/h of sleep) and in 15 normal lean male subjects (NS, age 38.2 +/- 1.4 years; BMI 21.2 +/- 0.8 kg/m2; AHI 1.9 +/- 0.8 events/h of sleep) we evaluated: (a) the ACTH and cortisol responses to CRH [2 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.)] and basal 24 h UFC levels; (b) the TSH and PRL responses to TRH (5 microg/kg iv) as well as FT3 and FT4 levels. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour UFC levels in OSAS and OB were similar and within the normal range. Basal ACTH and cortisol levels were similar in all groups. However, the ACTH response to CRH in OSAS (Deltapeak: 30.3 +/- 3.8 pmol/l; DeltaAUC: 682.8 +/- 128.4 pmol*h/l) was markedly higher (P < 0.001) than in OB (Deltapeak: 9.3 +/- 1.4 pmol/l; DeltaAUC 471.5 +/- 97.3 pmol*h/l), which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than in NS (Deltapeak: 3.3 +/- 0.9 pmol/l; DeltaAUC 94.7 +/- 76.7 pmol*h/l). On the other hand, the cortisol response to CRH was not significantly different in the three groups. Basal FT3 and FT4 levels as well as the TSH response to TRH were similar in all groups. Similarly, both basal PRL levels and the PRL response to TRH were similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to patients with simple abdominal obesity, obese patients with OSAS show a more remarkable enhancement of the ACTH response to CRH but a preserved TSH and PRL responsiveness to TRH. These findings indicate the existence of a peculiarly exaggerated ACTH hyper-responsiveness to CRH that would reflect hypoxia- and/or sleep-induced alterations of the neural control of corticotroph function; this further alteration is coupled to the previously described, peculiar reduction of somatotroph function.     

Growth hormone blunts protein oxidation and promotes protein turnover to a similar extent in abdominally obese and normal-weight women

Abdominally obese individuals have reduced 24-h plasma GH concentrations. Their normal plasma IGF-I levels may reflect GH hypersensitivity. Alternatively, obesity-associated hyposomatotropism may cause less biological effect in target tissues. We therefore determined whole-body responsiveness to the anabolic effects of GH in abdominally obese (OB) and normal weight (NW) premenopausal women. A 1-h iv infusion of GH or placebo was randomly administered to six NW (body mass index, 21.1 +/- 1.9 kg/m(2)) and six OB (body mass index, 35.5 +/- 1.5 kg/m(2)) women in a cross-over design. Endogenous insulin, glucagon and GH secretion was suppressed by infusion of somatostatin. Whole-body protein turnover was measured using a 10-h infusion of [(13)C]-leucine. GH administration induced a similar plasma GH peak in NW and OB women (49.8 +/- 10.4 vs. 45.1 +/- 5.6 mU/liter). GH, compared with placebo infusion, increased nonoxidative leucine disposal, P < 0.0001) and endogenous leucine appearance (R(a), P = 0.0004) but decreased leucine oxidation (P = 0.0051). All changes were similar in both groups. Accordingly, whole-body GH responsiveness, defined as the maximum response of nonoxidative leucine disposal, leucine R(a), and oxidation per unit of GH, was not different in OB and NW women (0.25 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.19 +/- 0.17 micro mol/kg.h, 0.21 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.17 micro mol/kg.h, and -0.10 +/- 0.08 vs. -0.08 +/- 0.05 micro mol/kg.h, respectively). These results indicated that whole-body tissue responsiveness to the net anabolic effect of GH is similar in OB and NW women. Hence, we inferred that hyposomatotropism may promote amino acid oxidation and blunt protein turnover in abdominal obesity. However, hyposomatotropism cannot account for all anomalous features of protein metabolism in abdominally obese humans.     

Glucagon inhibits ghrelin secretion in humans

OBJECTIVE: It is well known that i.m. glucagon administration stimulates GH and cortisol release in humans, although the mechanisms are unclear. These effects are similar to those described for ghrelin on somatotroph and corticotroph function. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of ghrelin in mediating the stimulatory effects of glucagon and to evaluate the effect of glucagon on ghrelin secretion. DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied the endocrine and metabolic response to i.m. glucagon administration in 24 subjects (14 men, 10 women; age 19-65 years; body mass index, 25.3 +/- 1 kg/m(2)), who were shown to have an intact anterior pituitary function as evaluated before enclosure. RESULTS: Serum ghrelin concentrations fell significantly at 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after glucagon administration (means +/- s.e.m.; baseline, 377.9 +/- 34.5 pg/ml; nadir, 294.6 +/- 28.3 pg/ml (60 min); P < 0.01). Conversely, i.m. glucagon elicited an increase in GH (baseline, 1.5 +/- 0.4 microg/l; peak, 14.2 +/- 2.7 microg/l (180 min); P < 0.01) and cortisol concentrations (baseline, 452.6 +/- 35.2 nmol/l; peak, 622.1 +/- 44 nmol/l (180 min); P < 0.01). The changes in ghrelin concentration at both 120 and 180 min were still significant after correction for glucose and insulin (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We show that i.m. glucagon decreases ghrelin significantly. Therefore, the already known stimulatory effects of i.m. glucagon on cortisol and GH are not mediated by a change in ghrelin concentrations. The mechanisms underlying the ghrelin suppression after i.m. glucagon are unlikely to include glucose or insulin variations and need to be further elucidated.     

Effects of cortistatin-14 and somatostatin-14 on the endocrine response to hexarelin in humans

Cortistatin (CST)-14, a neuropeptide with high structural homology with somatostatine (SS)-14, binds all SS receptor subtypes but also shows activities not shared by SS. CST and SS are often co-expressed in the same neurons but are regulated by different stimuli. Moreover, CST, but not SS, also binds the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor. We compared the effects of CST-14 and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h i.v. from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine response to hexarelin (HEX, 1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a synthetic GHS, in 6 normal volunteers [age (mean+/-SEM): 28.7+/-2.9 yr; body mass index: 23.4+/-0.8 kg/m2]. GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels were measured at each time point. CST-14 inhibited spontaneous GH secretion [delta-areas under curves (-AUC): -83.57+/-44.8 vs 2.3+/-2.7 microg/l/h, p<0.01] to the same extent of SS-14 (-186.1+/-162.9 microg/l/h, p<0.01). CST-14 as well as SS-14 also inhibited insulin secretion (p<0.05). The GH response to HEX was similarly inhibited by either CST-14 (AUC: 3814.1+/-924.2 vs 1212.9+/-379.8 microg/l/h, p<0.05) or SS-14 (720.9+/-158.6 microg/l/h, p<0.05). HEX significantly increased PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels but these responses were not modified by either CST-14 or SS-14. The effects of CST-14 and SS-14 on insulin and glucose levels were not modified by HEX. In conclusion, this study shows that CST-14 inhibits the GH response to HEX to the same extent of SS-14. Like SS-14, CST-14 also inhibits insulin secretion but both do not modify the stimulatory effects of HEX on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Thus, CST-14 exerts full SS-14 activity in humans.     

Effect of a new synthetic hexapeptide to selectively stimulate growth hormone release in healthy human subjects

Growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP, SK&F 110679) is a hexapeptide (His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-LysNH2) that selectively stimulates the release of growth hormone (GH) but not other pituitary hormones in vitro and in vivo in a variety of animal species. GHRP was administered to 17 normal men at doses of from 0.05 to 2.5 micrograms/kg as a 30 min intravenous infusion. Eight of the men were infused with saline as a control. Serum GH increased consistently at doses of 0.25 microgram/kg and above during the infusion of the peptide, peaked at 45 min and then decreased to baseline values by 210 min. The mean peak serum GH concentrations (+/- SE) in response to GHRP infusion were 17.8 +/- 6.1 micrograms/L at a dose of 0.25 microgram/kg (n = 4, p = .03 vs saline), 38.3 +/- 9.2 micrograms/L at 0.5 microgram/kg (n = 4, p = .04 vs saline) and 63.0 +/- 5.4 micrograms/L at 1.0 microgram/kg (n = 4, p = .002 vs saline). Serum LH, FSH, TSH and ACTH were unaffected by GHRP administration. GHRP was safe and well-tolerated in all men. GHRP infusion resulted in a dramatic, selective and dose-dependent increase in serum GH concentrations.     

Characterization of new selective somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (sst2) antagonists, BIM-23627 and BIM-23454. Effects of BIM-23627 on GH release in anesthetized male rats after short-term high-dose dexamethasone treatment

We here report a pharmacological characterization of two new somatostatin (SS) receptor subtype-2 (sst2) selective antagonists by evaluating their GH-releasing activity when administered, by different routes, in anesthetized adult rats and in freely moving 10-d-old rats. Moreover, we describe the effect of these SS antagonists on the GH response to GHRH after short-term high-dose dexamethasone (DEX) treatment in young male rats. BIM-23454 and BIM-23627, given iv, were able to counteract the SS-induced inhibition of GH secretion occurring after urethane anesthesia in a dose-dependent manner. In DEX-treated animals, the GH response to GHRH was partially blunted (5-min peak values, 270 +/- 50 ng/ml in saline-treated vs. 160 +/- 10 ng/ml in DEX-treated, P < 0.05); however, the simultaneous administration of BIM-23627 (0.2 mg/kg, iv) restored higher amplitude GH pulse, leading to a significantly higher overall mean GH response (area under the curve, 4200 +/- 120 ng/ml/30 min vs. 2800 +/- 100 ng/ml/30 min after GHRH alone; P < 0.05). The SS antagonists showed a reduced GH-releasing effect when administered sc or ip, likely attributable to decreased bioavailability, as compared with the iv route. SS antagonist administration also increased plasma glucagon, insulin, and glucose levels. Based on prior reports that sst2 tonically suppresses glucagon secretion, the antagonist most likely increased glucagon secretion from the pancreatic alpha-cells, with resultant increases in plasma glucose and then insulin.     

Endocrine responses to ghrelin in adult patients with isolated childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid acylated peptide, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogues (GHS) receptor (GHS-R), which is specific for synthetic GHS. Similar to synthetic GHS, ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion but also displays significant stimulatory effects on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. It has been hypothesized that isolated GH deficiency (GHD) could reflect hypothalamic impairment that would theoretically involve defect in ghrelin activity. PATIENTS: In the present study, we verified the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg i.v.) on GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in adult patients with isolated severe GHD [five males and one female, age (mean +/- SEM) 24.7 +/- 2.6 years, BMI 25.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m2]. In all patients, the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1 IU regular insulin i.v.) and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) (1 microg/kg i.v.) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) was also studied. The hormonal responses in GHD were compared with those in age-matched normal subjects (NS, seven males, age 28.6 +/- 2.9 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2). RESULTS: IGF-I levels in GHD were markedly lower than in NS (69.8 +/- 11.3 vs. 167.9 +/- 19.2 microg/l, P < 0.003). Ghrelin administration induced significant increase in GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in all GHD. In GHD, the GH response to ghrelin was higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH + ARG, which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than that to ITT (9.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 microg/l). These GH (1 microg/l = 2 mU/l) responses in GHD were markedly lower (P < 0.0001) than those in NS (ghrelin vs. GHRH + ARG vs. ITT 92.1 +/- 16.7 vs. 65.3 +/- 8.9 vs. 17.7 +/- 3.5 microg/l). In GHD, the highest individual peak GH response to ghrelin was markedly lower than the lowest peak GH response in NS (28.5 vs. 42.9 microg/l). GHD and NS showed overlapping PRL (1 microg/l = 32 mU/l) (10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.9 +/- 2.2 microg/l), ACTH (22.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 18.7 +/- 4.6 pmol/l) and cortisol responses (598.1 +/- 52.4 vs. 486.9 +/- 38.9 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that ghrelin is one of the most powerful provocative stimuli of GH secretion, even in those patients with isolated severe GHD. In this condition, however, the somatotroph response is markedly reduced while the lactotroph and corticotroph responsiveness to ghrelin is fully preserved, indicating that this endocrine activity is fully independent of mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect. These results do not support the hypothesis that ghrelin deficiency is a major cause of isolated GH deficiency but suggest that ghrelin might represent a reliable provocative test to evaluate the maximal GH secretory capacity provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed.     

The GH-releasing effect of ghrelin,a natural GH secretagogue,is only blunted by the infusion of exogenous somatostatin in humans

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28-amino-acid peptide purified from the stomach and showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at the serine 3 residue, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R). Ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion in both animals and humans, showing a synergistic effect with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) but no interaction with synthetic GHS. However, the activity of ghrelin as well as that of non-natural GHS is not fully specific for GH; ghrelin also induces a stimulatory effect on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion, at least in humans. DESIGN: To further clarify the mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing activity of this natural GHS, we studied the effects of somatostatin (SS, 2.0 microg/kg/h from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) in seven normal young male volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM) 28.6 +/- 2.9 years; body mass index (BMI) 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effect of SS on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microm/kg i.v. at 0 min) was also studied. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -30 up to +120 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels were assayed after ghrelin administration alone and during SS infusion. RESULTS: The GH response to ghrelin (hAUC0'-->120' 2695.0 +/- 492.6 microg min/l) was higher (P < 0.01) than that after GHRH (757.1 +/- 44.1 microg min/l). SS infusion almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (177.0 +/- 37.7 microg min/l, P < 0.01); the GH response to ghrelin was inhibited by SS (993.8 +/- 248.5 microg min/l, P < 0.01) but GH levels remained higher (P < 0.05) than with GHRH. Ghrelin induced significant increases in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels and these responses were not modified by SS. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin, a natural GHS-R ligand, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans and this effect is only blunted by an exogenous somatostatin dose which almost abolishes the GH response to GHRH. The stimulatory effect of ghrelin on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion is refractory to exogenous somatostatin, indicating that these effects occur through pathways independent of somatostatinergic influence.     

Non-acylated ghrelin does not possess the pituitaric and pancreatic endocrine activity of acylated ghrelin in humans

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R) type 1a at the hypothalamus-pituitary level. Ghrelin and synthetic GHS also possess other GH-independent peripheral endocrine and non-endocrine activities via the activation of peripheral GHS-R subtypes. In rats in vivo non-acylated ghrelin has been reported devoid of any endocrine activity; however, in vitro, it has been shown as effective as ghrelin in exerting anti-proliferative activity on tumor cell lines. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether non-acylated human ghrelin shares some of the endocrine activities of its acylated form in humans. To this goal, the effects of acylated or non-acylated ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) on GH, PRL, ACTH, F, insulin and glucose levels were studied in two different testing sessions in 7 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SE]: 24.3 +/- 1.7 yr; BMI: 21.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m2). The effects of placebo administration were also studied. The administration of acylated ghrelin induced prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (AUC: 5452.4 +/- 904.9 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo) and significant increase in PRL (1273.5 +/- 199.7 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo), ACTH (4482.7 +/- 954.4 pg*min/ml; p < 0.01 vs placebo) and F levels (15985.0 +/- 1141.9 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo). Its administration was also followed by decrease in insulin levels (1448.67 +/- 137.9 mU*min/l; p < 0.05 vs placebo) that was coupled with an increase in plasma glucose levels (10974.2 +/- 852.5 mg*min/dl; p < 0.05 vs placebo). The administration of non-acylated ghrelin and that of placebo did not induce any change in the hormonal parameters or in glucose levels. In conclusion, this study shows that in humans nonacylated ghrelin does not possess the pituitaric and pancreatic endocrine activities of human ghrelin octanoylated in Serine 3.     

Corticotropin-releasing effect of hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in normal subjects pretreated with metyrapone or RU-486, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, and in patients with Addison's disease.

GH secretagogues (GHS) are peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules which possess strong GH-releasing activity but also stimulatory effect on hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. The ACTH and cortisol responses to Hexarelin (HEX), a peptidyl GHS, are abolished by low-dose dexamethasone pretreatment in normal subjects but are exaggerated and higher than those after hCRH in patients with pituitary ACTH-dependent Cushing's disease, in spite of their hypercortisolism. Based on the foregoing, we studied the ACTH, cortisol and GH responses to HEX (2.0 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min) alone and after metyrapone (2 g p.o. at 23:00 h the night before) or RU-486 (400 mg p.o. at 02:00 h), a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, in 6 normal women (NS, age 26-34 years). The endocrine responses (mean +/- SEM) to HEX alone were also studied in 8 patients with Addison's disease (AD, 6 males, 2 females, age 30-77 years; last hydrocortisone administration the day before testing). In NS, HEX stimulated basal ACTH (peak, mean +/- SEM: 26.0 +/- 7.8 vs. 10.7 +/- 2.0 pg/ml, p < 0. 05), cortisol (163.2 +/- 18.3 vs. 137.4 +/- 15.4 microgram/l, p < 0.05) and GH (72.6 +/- 23.5 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.3 microgram/l, p < 0.01) levels. Metyrapone markedly increased basal ACTH (294.4 +/- 61.6 pg/ml, p < 0.05), reduced basal cortisol (19.6 +/- 7.2 microgram/l, p < 0.05), while it did not modify GH levels. After metyrapone pretreatment the ACTH response to HEX was clearly increased (DeltaAUC: 2,857.4 +/- 901.9 vs. 367.3 +/- 274.0 pg/ml/h, p < 0.05), while the GH response was not modified. HEX did not stimulate the low cortisol levels after metyrapone pretreatment. RU-486 significantly increased basal ACTH (76.6 +/- 12.5 pg/ml, p < 0.05) and cortisol (312.7 +/- 22.2 microgram/l, p < 0.05), while it did not modify basal GH levels. RU-486 pretreatment did not modify the ACTH, cortisol and GH responses to HEX. In AD, HEX elicited a marked ACTH response (6,619.4 +/- 3,365.8 pg/ml/h; p < 0.01), which was clearly higher (p < 0.01) than that in NS after HEX alone but not significantly different from that after HEX+MET. The GH response to HEX in AD (1,325.6 +/- 284.1 microgram/l/h) was similar to that in NS (1,519.7 +/- 483.8 microgram/l/h). In conclusion, our present data demonstrate that the ACTH-releasing activity of HEX is increased in primary hypoadrenalism as well as in normal subjects after metyrapone but not after RU-486 pretreatment. These findings indicate that in normal subjects as well as in hypocortisolemic patients the ACTH-releasing activity of GHS is enhanced by the lack of negative glucocorticoid feedback.     

Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in central diabetes insipidus: ACTH and cortisol responsiveness to CRH administration

A strong relationship has been found between arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in humans. The aim of the current study was to evaluate baseline and CRH-stimulated ACTH and F levels in patients with central diabetes insipidus (CDI), before and after replacement therapy with desamino-D-AVP (DDAVP). Twenty-five patients with CDI, and 25 sex- and age- and BMI-matched healthy subjects entered the study. A standard CRH test (measurement of plasma ACTH and serum F before and every 15 min for 2 h after the administration of 100 microg of human CRH) was performed in all subjects. In patients with CDI, CRH test were repeated after 1 week of DDAVP at standard doses. At study entry, ACTH and F levels were significantly higher in patients with CDI than in controls either at baseline (ACTH: 45.5+/-4.8 vs 18.5+/-3.3 ng/l, p<0.05; F: 375.1+/-55.7 vs 146.6+/-19.4 microg/l, p<0.05) or after CRH test considered as a peak (ACTH: 90.8+/-14.4 vs 42.5+/-7.4 ng/l, p<0.05; F: 501.6+/-65.7 vs 226.3+/- 25.6 microg/l, p<0.05) and AUC (ACTH: 3997.0+/-571.7 vs 2136.0+/-365.8 ng/l/120 min, p<0.05; F: 31,489.0+/-4299.4 vs 14,854.5+/-1541.5 microg/l/120 min, p<0.05). In patients with CDI, 1 week of replacement with DDAVP brought down ACTH (peak: 56.9+/-9.3 ng/l; AUC: 2390.7+/-480.7 ng/l/120 min) and F (peak: 310.3+/-39.5 microg/l; AUC: 17,555.5+/-2008.7 microg/l/120 min) responses to CRH to normal but did not significantly modify baseline hormone levels (ACTH: 29.6+/-3.6 ng/l; F: 239.0+/-32.3 microg/l). In conclusion, CDI is associated to increased baseline ACTH and F levels and increased responsiveness of ACTH and F to CRH administration. In addition, replacement treatment with DDAVP normalized CRH-induced but not baseline ACTH and F secretion.     

Human galanin secretion is increased upon normal exercise test in middle-age individuals

Galanin, a neuropeptide, is found in the central nervous system and in a number of nonbrain areas including adrenal sympathetic medullar tissue and pancreas. Several studies involve galanin in the regulation of GH, which responds to stressful stimuli. This study refers to the investigation of the effect of a 20-min exercise on plasma human galanin (hGAL) and GH in middle-aged healthy volunteer adults. Thirteen individuals, 5 males and 8 females aged 40-50 years (44.7 +/- 2.95) were selected on the basis of normal body mass index (22.5 +/- 2.3 kg/m2) and the absence of endocrine or any other abnormality. Basal concentrations of GH and hGAL were measured between 0800 and 0900h after an overnight fast. Post exercise levels were recorded after termination of the stressful test and 15 min thereafter. GH and hGAL were determined by an immunoradiometric and radioimmunoassay, respectively. The exercise-potentiated GH response in all subjects with post-exercise levels significantly higher (11.09 +/- 1.8 ng/ml vs 1.27 +/- 0.7 ng/ml, p<0.0001, F=32.44) with the peak in the hormone level detected 15 min after the end of exercise (12.09 +/- 1.96 ng/ml). Plasma hGAL levels were also substantially affected by the acute exercise test, in that post exercise peripheral blood concentration was significantly higher from the basal values (21.51 +/- 9.94 vs 13.46 +/- 7.2 pg/ml, p<0.02, F=5.50). Again the hGAL values peaked 15 min after the end of exercise (24.0 +/- 10.5 pg/ml, P<0.015, F = 4.68). However, the time-correlation of the increments of GH and hGAL did not reach a statistically significant level (20 min: r=0.41, p=0.161., 35 min: r=-0.095, P=0.758). These results clearly show an independence of the two hormones. The responsivity of hGAL of middle-aged individuals to the exercise stimulus might be due to the higher releasable pool of the hormone.