A clinical investigation of the relationship between the quality of conventional complete dentures and the patients’ quality of life

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between the clinical quality of conventional complete dentures and patient quality of life.

Materials and methods

This study included a random sample of 32 completely edentulous patients (15 males and 17 females) who were treated with conventional complete dentures. Using a validated questionnaire, three investigators evaluated the dentures independently on the basis of seven clinical parameters: esthetics (lip support and lower lip line), retention and stability of the maxillary and the mandibular dentures, and occlusion. Patients completed the validated Oral Health Impact Profile-20 (OHIP-20) questionnaire. Correlations were determined by using the point-biserial correlation coefficient.

Results

Clinicians rated the overall clinical quality of the dentures satisfactory in 80.3% of patients. The mean (±standard deviation) total OHIP-20 score was 56.3 ± 15.9 out of a possible 120 maximum. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between the stability of the maxillary and mandibular dentures and the total OHIP-20 score (p = 0.009 and 0.0023, respectively). A negative correlation between the total OHIP-20 score and the retention of the mandibular denture approached significance (p = 0.092). Esthetics, retention of the maxillary denture, and occlusion were not correlated with patient quality of life (p > 0.169).

Conclusion

Stability of the maxillary and mandibular dentures is the denture quality parameter that can most significantly affect patient quality of life.     

Bleaching efficacy and quality of life of different bleaching techniques — randomized controlled trial

Clinical Oral Investigations - To evaluate bleaching efficacy and oral health-related quality of life (ORHQoL) of three bleaching systems with similar hydrogen peroxide (HP) concentration for up to...     

Can dental attendance improve quality of life?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between reported dental attendance patterns and the public's perception of how oral health impacts on quality of life (QoL). METHOD: A national UK study involving a random probability sample of 2,668 adults. Respondents were interviewed in their homes about how oral health affects their QoL and about their dental attendance pattern. Responses were coded as oral health having a negative impact, positive impact or impact in general (either positive and/or negative) on QoL. RESULTS: The response rate was 70% with 1,865 adults participating in the study. 72% (1,340) reported that their oral health affected their QoL in general, 57% (1,065) reported that it had a positive effect, and 48% (902) that it had a negative effect. 61% (1,136) reported to have attended the dentist within the last year- 'regular attenders'. Bivaraite analysis identified association between perception of how oral health impacts on QoL and dental attendance pattern (P < 0.01). When socio-demographic factors (age, gender, and social class) were taken into account in the analysis, 'regular attenders' reported that oral health had greater impact in general on QoL (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.63) and, specifically, a greater positive impact (OR = 1.49, 95% CI=1.44, 1.77). CONCLUSION: Dental attendance is associated with perceptions of how oral health impacts on QoL, specifically enhanced life quality. This may have implications for understanding the health gain of regular dental attendance.     

Prediction of compliance and completion of orthodontic treatment: are quality of life measures important?

The main aim of the present investigation was to evaluate whether there is an association between completion of orthodontic treatment and quality of life measures, i.e. age, gender, socio-economic status, type of appliance and need for orthodontic treatment. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether compliance with orthodontic treatment (missed appointments and appliance breakages) was associated with age, gender, socio-economic status, or type of appliance. This was a multi-centre longitudinal observational study carried out on 144 patients (65 males and 79 females) aged 10-19 years. Baseline data were collected: patient age, gender, socio-economic status, Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and type of appliance. Quality of life information, including orthodontic utility values and oral aesthetic subjective impact score (OASIS), were also collected at the start of treatment. The main outcome measure was whether a patient completed treatment. Compliance was assessed by recording the number of failed appointments and appliance breakages. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the association between independent and dependent variables. None of the baseline variables, including quality of life measures, were associated with a patient completing treatment, or their compliance with treatment (P > 0.05). Thus, quality of life measures (utility values or OASIS) do not add to our knowledge of who may complete, or co-operate with, orthodontic treatment. In addition, neither age, gender, socio-economic status nor clinical treatment need (IOTN) were useful in helping a clinician to choose potentially co-operative patients.     

Implant treatment in periodontally compromised subjects—quality of life and patient satisfaction

Objectives

The aims of this study were to determine the quality of life of periodontally compromised patients after implant treatment (primary aim) and their satisfaction with the restoration and treatment approach (secondary aim).

Material and methods

In this study, 61 adult subjects were evaluated following non-surgical periodontal treatment, under regular maintenance and implant therapy with a fixed restoration. Oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) was assessed using the German short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G14). Patient satisfaction with the restoration and treatment procedure was investigated applying a self-designed questionnaire focusing on social-psychological aspects. Statistical analysis of the collected data was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Man-Whitney U test for the relationship between OHIP score and number of implants, patient age and level of education.

Results

The average OHIP-G14 score of the examined study population was 2.78 (SD ±4.2), while the item pain had the biggest influence on the number of points. No statistical significance was detected between the relationship of OHIP-G14 score and the number of placed implants (p = 0.98). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant correlation between OHIP-G14 score and patient age (p = 0.67) or for level of education (p = 0.39). The questionnaire focusing on patient satisfaction showed a high level of contentment in this study population. All patients declared that they would repeat the treatment and most (98.4 %) would recommend it to their friends. Furthermore, a high level of satisfaction with aesthetics, stability, cleanability and speech comprehension was reported.

Conclusion

The examined study population showed a quality of life after implant therapy comparable to pre-existing reference values of a healthy non-restored population. There was no statistical significance between OHIP-G 14 score and the number of implants, patients’ age and education level. Analysis of the satisfaction with the realized implant therapy provided consistently positive results.

Clinical relevance

When restoring periodontally compromised patients, implant treatment should be considered to achieve potentially higher oral health-related quality of life compared to for example removable dentures. This needs to be investigated in randomized controlled clinical trials.

     

Does orthodontic treatment affect patients' quality of life?

The oral-facial region is usually an area of significant concern for the individual because it draws the most attention from other people in interpersonal interactions and is the primary source of vocal, physical, and emotional communication. As a result, patients who seek orthodontic treatment are concerned with improving their appearance and social acceptance, often more than they are with improving their oral function or health. Enhancing these aspects of quality of life is an important motive for undergoing orthodontic treatment. Regardless of age, patients' and their parents' or caregivers' expectations about improvements in oral function, esthetics, social acceptance, and body image are important for both general dentists and orthodontists to consider when advising patients about these procedures and during the treatment process. This review of research on the impact of conventional and surgical orthodontics on quality of life examines the association between oral health-related quality of life and severity and type of malocclusion, as well as the impact of treatment and patient characteristics on quality of life. The article will emphasize the importance of clinicians' having a clear understanding, before initiating treatment, of their patients' quality of life and their expectations about improvements in specific domains of quality of life.     

Exploring the relation between patients’ resilience and quality of life after treatment for cancer of the head and neck

Resilience, which is a measure of a patient's ability to recover from a traumatic event, varies among the general population, and previous studies have suggested that it has an important influence on a patient's quality of life. We conducted a study of patients treated for cancer of the head and neck to investigate the relation between scores for resilience and quality of life (QoL). A total of 98 patients, who had been treated with curative intent, completed the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire (UW-QoL) and the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Retrospective analysis of patients’ records identified demographic data, stage of disease, and treatment. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman’s rank correlation were used to assess the significance of differences between the groups. The mean (SE) QoL score after treatment was 61 (2.081), and the mean CD-RISC score 0.427 for QoL in the last seven days. There was a significant correlation between overall scores for QoL and resilience (Spearman's Rho = 0.427, p < 0.005). As higher resilience scores had a significant correlation with a better QoL, strengthening a patient’s resilience might in turn help to improve their quality of life.     

Is negative affectivity associated with oral quality of life?

OBJECTIVES: The personality trait of negative affectivity (NA) is associated with reports of worse physical health, more symptoms and worse health-related quality of life but its associations with oral quality of life (OQOL) are unexplored. In this study we examined the association of NA with OQOL. METHODS: We drew on data from two samples of older men: The VA Dental Longitudinal Study (DLS; n=177) and the Veterans Health Study (VHS; n=514), which included three measures of oral quality of life: the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Measure (OHQOL), the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), and the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Instrument (GOHAI). For each OQOL measure, and the GOHAI and OHIP subscales, two regression models were estimated to examine the marginal change in variance due to NA: the first model included age, number of teeth, and self-rated oral health, and the second added NA. RESULTS: In both bivariate and multivariate analyses, higher NA was consistently associated with worse scores on the OQOL measures. In the regression analyses, NA explained an additional.01 to 18% of the variance in OQOL, explaining the most variance in the OHIP and the least in the OHQOL. The addition of NA explained more variance in the more subjective, psychologically oriented GOHAI and OHIP subscales than it did in the more objective, physical function oriented subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial factors such as personality are significantly associated with quality of life ratings. Such associations should be taken into account when OQOL measurements are used and interpreted.     

Subjective and objective appearance of head and neck cancer patients following microsurgical reconstruction and associated quality of life─A cross-sectional study

Purpose

Depending on the site and size of head and neck cancer, the disease affects patients' appearance and subsequently their quality of life. The aim of this study was to correlate subjective and objective evaluation of facial appearance and associated quality of life following ablative tumor surgery and microsurgical reconstruction.

Is self-harm among orthodontic patients related to dislike of dentofacial features and oral health-related quality of life?

ObjectivesTo investigate the relationship between self-reported self-harm and dislike of dentofacial features and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).Materials and MethodsAnonymous, self-reporting questionnaires were completed by 699 school children (aged 13–14 years), representing over 1% of the age group in Amman, Jordan. Participants were invited from 23 randomly selected schools in 10 educational directorates. OHRQoL was assessed using the Child Perception Questionnaire (CPQ 11–14). Self-harm was assessed using a constructed self-reporting questionnaire. The relationship between OHRQoL and self-harm was assessed and significant findings were identified at probability of α = 0.05.ResultsOver one-quarter of schoolchildren (26.9%, n = 88) admitted self-harming behavior. Self-harm was reported to be due to dislike of dentofacial appearance among 12.9% of participants (n = 90). Higher CPQ 11–14 total scores and individual dimension scores were associated with the presence of self-harm (P < .001). High self-harm incidence was reported among participants who had dentofacial features that affected appearance (P < .001). Among subjects admitting self-harm, the frequency of self-harming behavior ranged from once to over 10 times per year.ConclusionsSignificant relationships were found between self-harm and dislike of dentofacial features and OHRQoL.     

The impact of malocclusions on oral health-related quality of life in children—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

A limited amount of systematic literature reviews on the association between malocclusions and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) summarize inconclusive results. Therefore, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association of malocclusions with OHRQOL in children.

Methods

Relevant studies were identified in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar and other databases. All studies with data on malocclusions or orthodontic treatment need and OHRQOL in children were included. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random effects models were used to estimate summary effect measures for the association between malocclusion and OHRQOL in a continuous and a categorical data analysis. Tests for heterogeneity, publication bias and sensitivity of results were performed.

Results

In total, 40 cross-sectional studies were included in the meta-analyses. Summary measures of the continuous data show that OHRQOL was significantly lowered in children with malocclusions (standardized mean difference (95 % CI]?=?0.29 (0.19–0.38)). The summary odds ratio for having an impact on OHRQOL was 1.74 times higher in children with malocclusion than in children without malocclusions. Heterogeneity among studies was partly explained by malocclusion assessment, age of the children and country of study conduction.

Conclusion

Our results provide evidence for a clear inverse association of malocclusion with OHRQOL. We also showed that the strength of the association differed depending on the age of the children and their cultural environment.

Clinical relevance

Dentists benefit from understanding the patient differences regarding the impact of malocclusions.

     

Salivary dysfunction and quality of life in Sjögren syndrome: a critical oral-systemic connection

BACKGROUND: The importance of oral health to systemic health and quality of life (QOL) is gaining attention. Although several studies have examined generic (general) QOL in Sj?gren syndrome (SS), little information exists on the effect of oral health on QOL and relationships among self-reported oral health, systemic health and objective clinical measures of health. The authors conducted this study to characterize these relationships in a sample of patients with SS. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with a diagnosis of SS ascertained by means of the 2002 American-European Consensus criteria completed both the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) QOL questionnaires. OHIP-14 measures pain; functional limitation; and psychological, emotional and social disability associated with the mouth. SF-36 measures physical and emotional health and the ability to perform usual activities. Additional measures included the number of self-reported autoimmune symptoms and an index of disease damage. Statistical analysis was performed by using hierarchical regression analysis. RESULTS: Both generic and oral health-related QOL were poor in these patients. Specifically, the findings indicated that salivary flow rate was correlated significantly with both Disease Damage Index and OHIP-14 ratings, the number of autoimmune symptoms was correlated significantly with both oral and generic QOL, and oral health accounted for a significant percentage of variance in SF-36 domains of general health and social function. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health appears to have an independent influence on general QOL in patients with SS. These findings underscore the importance of proactive dental management of the oral manifestations of SS. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists and physicians must work collaboratively to maintain oral health and quality of life for patients with Sj?gren syndrome. The dentist should address patients' concerns of xerostomia and hyposalivation in an aggressive manner.     

Mastication and oral health–related quality of life in removable denture wearers with Alzheimer disease

Statement of problem

Alzheimer disease (AD) can affect masticatory function, affecting oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL). Whether oral rehabilitation with conventional removable prostheses can restore masticatory function and improve OHRQoL in these individuals is unknown.

Well-being and quality of life among oral cancer patients – Psychological vulnerability and coping responses upon entering initial treatment

Background

Little is known about the psychological constitution and potential coping mechanisms of oral cancer patients when they enter initial treatment. This study aimed at 1) establishing a feasible study protocol and 2) implementing it to examine patients' coping and psychological responses during the initial treatment phase in the hospital.