Orthodontic treatment need in Asian adult males

Orthodontic treatment in adults has gained social and professional acceptance in recent years. An assessment of orthodontic treatment need helps to identify individuals who will benefit from treatment and safeguard their interest. The purpose of this study was to assess the objective and subjective levels of orthodontic treatment need in a sample of orthodontically untreated adult Asian males. A sample of male army recruits (n = 339, age 17-22 years, Chinese = 258, Malay = 60, Indian = 21) with no history of orthodontic treatment or craniofacial anomalies participated in the study on a voluntary basis with informed consent. Impressions for study models were taken. Objective treatment need was assessed based on study model analysis using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Questionnaires were used to assess subjective treatment need based on subjective esthetic component (EC) ratings. Fifty percentage of the sample had a definite need for orthodontic treatment (dental health component [DHC] grades 4 and 5), whereas 29.2% had a moderate need for treatment (DHC grades 3). The occlusal trait most commonly identified was dental crossbite. Malay males had the highest percentage with a definite need for treatment for both dental health and esthetic reasons in comparison with Chinese and Indian males. However, there was no difference in the level of treatment need among the ethnic groups (P > .05). No correlation between objective and subjective EC scores was found (P > .05). A high level of investigator-identified treatment need was not supported by a similar level of subject awareness among the adult sample.     

Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need.

The need for orthodontic treatment has an objective component based on occlusal traits and a subjective component based on the esthetic impact of the occlusion. An occlusal index that measures the objective deviation from normal or ideal occlusion might be sufficient to mirror the subjective opinion of orthodontists about treatment need. The objective of this study was to determine whether the American (US) and United Kingdom (UK) weightings of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index are valid instruments with which to determine treatment need. Fifteen orthodontists rated the need for orthodontic treatment of 170 casts. Their collective decision was compared with the PAR value for the cast determined by a calibrated examiner. A range of suggested treatment cutoff points from the literature was used to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and optimized cutoff points. The cutoff points were 17 for both the US PAR and the UK PAR, and sensitivity, specificity, and kappa were 92%, 86%, and 0.77 for the US PAR and 92%, 89%, and 0.80 for the UK PAR. The area under the ROC curve was 97% for the US PAR and the UK PAR. Both the US PAR and the UK PAR scores were excellent predictors of orthodontic treatment need as determined by a panel of orthodontists. An occlusal index used to measure deviation from normal or ideal occlusion might perform as well as indexes of treatment need in predicting orthodontists' evaluations of treatment need.     

轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错矫治后牙关系的PAR指数评价

目的比较轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错畸形拔牙矫治和非拔牙矫治的牙矫治效果。方法测量80例矫治完成的轻中度骨性Ⅲ类错患者治疗前后模型的PAR指数,并进行比较。结果两组治疗前,牙齿错位、咬合关系和覆盖的PAR指数有显著性,P<0.05;2组治疗后,牙齿错位与中线差异有显著性,P<0.05;治疗前后PAR减少的百分率中,牙齿错位、咬合关系项目差异有显著性,P<0.05。结论PAR分值能反映错严重程度,拔牙病例的错主要在牙齿错位、覆盖、中线不调方面较非拔牙病例重。拔牙矫治更有利于牙齿错位的调整。     

Effects of malocclusions and orthodontics on periodontal health: evidence from a systematic review

Many patients seek orthodontic treatment for esthetic improvement. These patients mostly present with mal-alignment of the anterior teeth. The positive effects of orthodontic treatment on their appearance and self-esteem are easy to envision. However, does orthodontic treatment provide dental health benefits in addition to the esthetic benefits? Do malocclusions harm the periodontium? Is correcting malocclusions with orthodontic treatment beneficial for periodontal health? The purpose of this study is to present evidence available on this topic. Two systematic reviews were conducted to address these questions: does a malocclusion affect periodontal health, and does orthodontic treatment affect periodontal health? Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established for both reviews, and an electronic search and a hand search were conducted. Several papers were included in both reviews, but the overall quality of the studies was weak. The first review found a correlation between the presence of a malocclusion and periodontal disease. Subjects with greater malocclusion have more severe periodontal disease. This may be dependent on oral health status. One should keep in mind that an association does not necessarily mean causation. The second review identified an absence of reliable evidence on the effects of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health. The existing low-quality evidence suggests that orthodontic therapy results in small detrimental effects to the periodontium. The results of both reviews do not warrant recommendation for orthodontic treatment to prevent future periodontal problems, except for specific unusual malocclusions.     

Early treatment outcome assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating index.

In this study, the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to objectively evaluate early treatment outcomes. Pretreatment and posttreatment casts of 103 consecutively treated patients were analyzed. The mean chronological, skeletal, and dental ages were 9. 82, 9.76, and 9.32 years, respectively. Calibrated examiners scored all models using the PAR ruler. PAR scores were weighed by means of a validation exercise. Cronbach alpha reliability analysis was used to establish the consistency of the subjective rating among 10 orthodontists of the severity of malocclusion. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the association among the orthodontists and the total PAR scores. Multiple regression analysis was used to determined the optimum weight of the PAR scores. Pretreatment and posttreatment differences were evaluated with t tests. The association between PAR scores and classification of malocclusions and treatment categories was assessed by means of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). A reduction in the PAR index was observed for the mean raw and weighted scores, from 15.82 to 8.82 and from 5.28 to 3.73, respectively (P <.001). Twenty percent of the sample greatly improved the PAR index, by a 70% reduction.3 Forty-eight percent improved scores by at least a 30% reduction.4 The remaining 32% did not reduce scores by at least 30%. Subjects with both Class I and Class II malocclusions reduced their scores similarly. There was no statistically significant association between reduction of PAR scores and treatment modalities.     

Assessment of upper jaw extraction versus upper and lower jaw extraction treatment for class II division 1 malocclusion using peer assessment rating index]

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of orthodontic treatment with upper jaw or upper and lower jaw extraction for Class II division 1 malocclusion using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. METHODS: 28 patients with Class II division 1 were extracted two first premolars or second premolars of upper jaw, and 24 patients were extracted four premolars of upper and lower jaw N. The PAR was applied on pre-and post-orthodontic treatment dental casts for the fifty-two cases. RESULTS: The upper and lower jaw extraction groups had significantly higher initial PAR scores and the weighted PAR total scores (P<0.05). Although significantly different before treatment, both groups were not statistically different after treatment (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The upper and lower jaw extraction cases showed more severe dental displacement. Both treatment can acquire successful results.     

Comparison of early treatment outcomes rendered in three different types of malocclusions

Objective:To evaluate the outcome of early treatment in Class I, II, and III malocclusions based on the reduction of weighted Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) scores.Materials and Methods:Two hundred thirty subjects (female = 105; male = 125) selected from 400 cases were divided into three groups based on their malocclusions (Class I, II, and III). The PAR index was evaluated prior to early treatment (T0), at the end of phase I (T1), and after completion of phase II therapy (T2). The reliability of overall PAR scores was assessed by Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient. The starting age, total weighted PAR scores and their changes after phase I and II treatments, treatment time, and the percentage of correction in the three different malocclusions were assessed by repeated-measures analysis of variance with post hoc analysis. The level of significance was set at P < .05.Results:More than 30% reduction of the weighted PAR scores and less than 10 points of the remaining weighted PAR scores were observed in all malocclusion groups at T1. The Class III group had the highest percentage of correction during phase I treatment.Conclusions:Early treatment effectively reduced the complexity of Class I, II, and III malocclusions and accounted for 57%, 64%, and 76% of the total correction, respectively, after phase I treatment, as indicated by an overall reduction in weighted PAR scores. The Class III group responded most favorably to early treatment followed by the Class II group.     

Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self-perceptions in 14-15-year-old Asian and Caucasian children in greater Manchester

The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the effect of ethnicity, social deprivation, and normative orthodontic treatment need on orthodontic aesthetic self-perception, self-perceived need for orthodontic treatment, and oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion; (ii) the effect of ethnicity, social deprivation, and gender on perceived orthodontic treatment need and use of orthodontic services; (iii) the influence of perceived oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion on perceived need and wish for orthodontic treatment; and (iv) whether orthodontic treatment experience influences perceived oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion. A stratified, random sample of 434 14-15-year-old children from schools in Manchester, UK, was obtained. Information was collected on orthodontic aesthetic self-perception and orthodontic treatment experience using a questionnaire. The former data were combined to form an Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Scale (OASIS). Normative orthodontic treatment need was measured with the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Children with higher clinical need for orthodontic treatment perceived themselves as worse off than their peers with lower need. More socially deprived children or those with high IOTN aesthetic component (AC) scores had a higher (i.e. more negative) aesthetic impact (OASIS) score. Asians and females had higher IOTN dental health component (DHC) scores, but a better aesthetic appearance than Caucasians and males. More deprived children were less likely to have received orthodontic treatment. Despite this, OASIS scores were similar between treated and untreated children. Untreated children who wished for orthodontic treatment had higher IOTN AC and OASIS scores.     

16～22岁青年与正畸医生对错(牙合)畸形的感知差异及其影响因素调查

目的 了解16～22岁青年人群对错胎畸形、牙齿美观和健康的感知,以及该人群与正畸医生对错(牙合)畸形、牙齿美观和健康的感知差异及其相关影响因素.方法 选择在南京陆军指挥学院门诊部口腔科就诊的16～22岁青年为研究对象,采用一般人口调查问卷、正畸治疗需要指数[由美观因素(AC)与牙齿健康因素(DHC)组成]以及牙齿健康因...     

Efficiency of Class I and Class II malocclusion treatment with four premolar extractions

Four premolar extractions is a successful protocol to treat Class I malocclusion, but it is a less efficient way when compared with other Class II treatment protocols.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of anteroposterior discrepancy on the success of four premolar extractions protocol. For that, treatment efficiency of Class I and complete Class II malocclusions, treated with four premolar extractions were compared.

Methods:

A sample of 107 records from 75 Class I (mean age of 13.98 years - group 1) and 32 Class II (mean age of 13.19 years - group 2) malocclusion patients treated with four premolar extractions was selected. The initial and final occlusal status of each patient was evaluated on dental casts with the PAR index. The treatment time was calculated based on the clinical charts, and the treatment efficiency was obtained by the ratio between the percentage of PAR reduction and treatment time. The PAR index and its components, the treatment time and the treatment efficiency of the groups were statistically compared with t tests and Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results:

The Class II malocclusion patients had a greater final PAR index than Class I malocclusion patients, and similar duration (Class I - 28.95 mo. and Class II - 28.10 mo.) and treatment efficiency.

Conclusion:

The treatment of the complete Class II malocclusion with four premolar extractions presented worse occlusal results than Class I malocclusion owing to incomplete molar relationship correction.     

Panel perception of facial attractiveness

The full-face and profile photographic transparencies of 60 subjects (30 male, 30 female) divided equally among Angles Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III malocclusions, taken before and after orthodontic treatment, were randomly distributed in projector carousels and shown to four panels consisting of orthodontists, dental students, art students, and the parents of children undergoing orthodontic treatment. The faces were rated according to the method of Lundstrom et al. (1987). Full-face views generally were rated more attractive than profile views and Class II and Class III malocclusion subjects were rated lower than Class I malocclusion subjects. While the art student and parent panels were less critical in their appraisal of facial attractiveness, they were less sensitive to the changes brought about by orthodontic treatment than the orthodontist and dental student panels, although all could appreciate an improvement in the Class II Division 1 group.     

ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE TO A CLASS III SUBDIVISION MALOCCLUSION

Class III malocclusions are considered one of the most complex and difficult orthodontic problems to diagnose and treat. Skeletal and/or dental asymmetries in patients presenting with Class III malocclusions can worsen the prognosis. Recognizing the dentoalveolar and skeletal characteristics of subdivision malocclusions and their treatment possibilities is essential for a favorable nonsurgical correction. Therefore, this article presents a nonsurgical asymmetric extraction approach to Class III subdivision malocclusion treatment which can significantly improve the occlusal and facial discrepancies.     

The seven-year outcome of an early orthodontic treatment strategy

The benefits of early orthodontic treatment are continuously discussed, but studies are few. We examined whether definite need for orthodontic treatment could be eliminated in public health care by systematically focusing on early intervention. One age cohort living in a rural Finnish municipality (N = 85) was regularly followed from ages 8 to 15 years, and persons with malocclusions were treated according to a pre-planned protocol. Treatment need was assessed according to the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, and treatment outcome by the Peer Assessment Rating Index (PAR). Fifty-two percent of the cohort received treatment, and definite treatment need decreased from 33% to 9%. In the treated group, the mean PAR score reduction was 63%, and 51% showed more than 70% improvement. The results suggest that an early treatment strategy may considerably reduce the need for orthodontic treatment in public health care with limited specialist resources.     

Effect of personality on oral health–related quality of life in undergraduates

Objectives:To evaluate the effects of personality traits and other variables on oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) of Chinese undergraduates aged 17 to 24 years with no history of orthodontic treatment.Materials and Methods:A total of 443 undergraduate students aged 17 to 24 years were selected and completed a two-section questionnaire: the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale Chinese version and the Oral Health Impact Profile–14 Chinese version (OHIP-14). Malocclusion severity was assessed via clinical examination using the dental health component (DHC) and esthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Severe dentofacial deformities that required orthognathic surgery were excluded.Results:The total and all dichotomized OHIP-14 dimensions correlated closely with the neuroticism personality traits (P < .001). The total and some subscales of OHIP-14 were related with psychoticism. Women had higher OHIP-14 scores than men, especially in the normal occlusion group. Nevertheless, men with more severe malocclusions had higher scores that were similar to those of women. OHRQoL was significantly different between the major of dentistry and other majors.Conclusions:Personality affects comprehensive OHRQoL, and the most significant predictor is neuroticism. Female young adults have worse OHRQoL than male young adults, especially among those with mild malocclusion.     

The need for orthodontic treatment.

Basic problems of the need and demand for orthodontic treatment have been discussed and new areas of research have been identified. Discrepancies have been described between the views of the dental profession and the potential patients on malocclusion and the need for treatment. For malocclusions with or without impairment of the function the self perception of the patient may be different from and of more relevance than the professional judgment of the orthodontist. Before going into orthodontic treatment, the social sufficiency of the patient should be evaluated.     

A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part I. Reliability and validity

Since the decision to seek orthodontic treatment is frequently the result of concerns about appearance, assessment of need for treatment should include an impartial evaluation of dental-facial appearance. While some of the standardized techniques for assessing malocclusion have included a consideration of esthetic impairment, they tend to confound this with functional impairment. The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable index that provides relatively objective judgments of dental-facial attractiveness. The subjects in this study were eighth- and ninth-grade children seeking orthodontic treatment and their siblings, and eighth- and ninth-grade children not seeking treatment and their siblings. Photographs of the children were rated for dental-facial attractiveness by lay and dental judges. Children were also assessed for severity of malocclusion by means of the Treatment Priority index. Children seeking treatment were perceived as significantly less attractive than children not seeking treatment. Dental judges rated children seeking treatment as more attractive than did nondental judges. Intraclass reliability coefficients were moderate to high.     

Appropriateness of orthodontic referrals: self-perceived and normative treatment needs of patients referred for orthodontic consultation

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate the self-perceived and normative orthodontic treatment needs of children referred for orthodontic consultation and to determine the proportion of children who were inappropriately referred. METHODS: The sample consisted of 257 children with a mean age of 12.0 years (SD = 2.4). An orthodontist assessed the children's normative treatment need using the dental health component (DHC) of the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN), and for patients in the mixed dentition the need for interceptive treatment was assessed. Questionnaires were answered by both the child and the parent to assess satisfaction with dental appearance and desire for treatment. RESULTS: The distribution of the IOTN grades showed that 73% of the children had definite need while 27% had borderline/no need for orthodontic treatment. Twenty-six per cent of children and 17% of parents did not express orthodontic concern, even though more than half of these children were in definite need of treatment as assessed by IOTN. The children's orthodontic concern was significantly related to the DHC scores. Out of the 103 children who were in the mixed dentition, only about 16% required interceptive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that a significant number of children were inappropriately referred for orthodontic treatment. Referring dentists need to assess the normative treatment needs of the children as well as the children's and parents' commitment and desire for orthodontic treatment before deciding on the need for referral.     

Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.

This paper examines the relationship between orthodontists' subjective assessment of treatment need and objective measurements obtained during standardized intra- and extraoral examinations. Logistic regression modeling was used to develop predictive models of treatment need. Data were obtained from 1155 eighth-grade students by four orthodontists who used standardized examination forms to assess demographics, trauma, skeletal relationships, morphologic malocclusion traits, and mandibular function. At the conclusion of the examination, the orthodontist rated the subjective treatment need as none, elective, recommended, soon, or immediate. For some analyses, the categories were collapsed to represent no need and need. The peer assessment rating (PAR) index (American validated version) was computed from the clinical exam findings and scoring of dental models; PAR scores were used to document malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Spearman rank correlation coefficients quantified the relationship between PAR scores and need categories. Logistic regression analysis modeled treatment need using components of the PAR index as well as other variables. The components of these models, as well as sensitivity and specificity, were compared with malocclusion severity/treatment difficulty scores obtained from malocclusion assessments using the PAR index. The five subjective treatment need categories and the PAR index scores were significantly correlated (rho = 0.62, p<0.001). Significant differences were detected between the need and no need groups for all PAR components (p<0.001). PAR index scores and predicted probabilities from logistic regression models performed equally well for classification purposes (no need, need). The data suggest that the PAR index is highly correlated with orthodontists' subjective assessment of treatment need when that assessment is made in the absence of financial considerations and patient desires.     

An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system.

The PAR Index was developed to measure treatment outcome in orthodontics. Validity was improved by weighting the scores of some components to reflect their relative importance. However, the index still has limitations, principally due to the high weight assigned to overjet. Difficulties also arise from the application of one weighting system to all malocclusions, since occlusal features vary in importance in different classes of malocclusion. The present study examined PAR Index validity using orthodontic consultant assessments as the 'Gold standard' and clinical ranking of occlusal features and statistical modelling to derive a new weighting system, separate for each malocclusion class. Discriminant and regression analyses were used to derive new criteria for measuring treatment outcome. As a result a new and more sensitive method of assessment is suggested which utilizes a combination of point and percentage reductions in PAR scores. This was found to have better correlations with the 'Gold standard' than the PAR nomogram.     

正畸治疗对安氏Ⅱ~1类错面部容貌的影响

目的:通过研究安氏Ⅱ1类错畸形患者治疗前、后面部彩色照片的视觉模拟评分变化,探讨正畸治疗对安氏Ⅱ1类错畸形患者面部容貌的影响。方法:从本院就诊正畸患者中随机挑选男女各40例,由评分小组对每例患者的一组照片给出视觉模拟评分,选择视觉模拟评分均数与中位数最接近且标准差较小的男女各1例的照片作为参照照片。然后对安氏Ⅱ1类错畸形患者治疗前、后2组照片进行视觉模拟评分。随机挑选40例治疗结束的安氏Ⅱ1类错畸形患者,将每位患者矫治前或治疗后的相片及同性别的参照照片作为一个单位同时显示,按顺序随机排列,由评分小组进行视觉模拟评分。对治疗前、后的评分用SPSS11.0软件包进行单样本t检验及配对t检验。结果:选出了男女各1例患者的照片作为参照照片;安氏Ⅱ1类错畸形患者治疗前总体均数为43.839,治疗后总体均数为48.328。假设人群中评分值总体均数为50,将所有患者治疗前评分做单样本t检验,P<0.01,差异有统计学意义;治疗后评分值做单样本t检验,P﹥0.05,差异无统计学意义。将治疗前和治疗后评分的总体均数进行配对t检验,P<0.01,差异有统计学意义,治疗后高于治疗前。结论:安氏Ⅱ1类错畸形明显影响患者的面部容貌,正畸治疗可以明显改善安氏Ⅱ1类错畸形患者的面部容貌,使之达到普通人群水平。