Selective blockade of D(3) dopamine receptors enhances the anti-parkinsonian properties of ropinirole and levodopa in the MPTP-lesioned primate

To date, the lack of highly selective antagonists at the dopamine D(3) receptor has hampered clarification of their involvement in the actions of currently used therapies in Parkinson's disease. However, the novel benzopyranopyrrole, S33084, displays greater than 100-fold selectivity as an antagonist for D(3) versus D(2) receptors and all other sites tested. S33084 was administered to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned marmosets previously primed with levodopa to elicit dyskinesia. Administered alone, S33084 exerted a modest, but significant, anti-parkinsonian effect without provoking dyskinesia. At low D(3)-selective doses (0.16 and 0.64 mg/kg), S33084 potentiated, though to different extents and in qualitatively different ways, the anti-parkinsonian actions of both ropinirole and levodopa. At these doses, S33084 did not significantly modify levodopa-induced or ropinirole-induced dyskinesia. These data suggest that ropinirole and levodopa do not exert their anti-parkinsonian or pro-dyskinetic actions via D(3) receptor stimulation. Indeed, stimulation of D(3) receptors may be detrimental to the anti-parkinsonian properties of D(2)/D(3) agonists. Selectivity for stimulation of D(2), over D(3), receptors may therefore be a beneficial property of dopamine receptor agonists in management of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease patients with established dyskinesia.     

Levodopa induces a cytoplasmic localization of D1 dopamine receptors in striatal neurons in Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease is characterized by a massive loss of nigral dopamine neurons that results in a reduction of dopamine concentrations in the striatum. The most commonly used treatment for this disease is levodopa therapy to restore striatal dopamine. This treatment is mediated by dopamine receptors, but the effect of treatment and the disease on receptor distribution is unknown. In this study, the distribution of D1 dopamine receptors was analyzed at the cellular and subcellular level in the striatum of 5 patients with Parkinson's disease (all treated with levodopa) and 4 control subjects. In the control brains, D1 dopamine receptors were mostly detected on the plasma membrane of medium-sized spiny neurons. The quantitative analysis performed at the ultrastructural level in patients with Parkinson's disease revealed an increase in immunostaining in the cytoplasm of medium-sized neurons. This effect was likely the result of the treatment rather than the dopaminergic denervation, as such changes were not observed in the striatum of rats with a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine nigrostriatal lesion, but were present in normal or lesioned rats treated with a D1 dopamine agonist. Altered localization of D1 dopamine receptors may participate in the occurrence of side effects of levodopa therapy such as dyskinesia and fluctuations in motor performances.     

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.     

D1 and functionally selective dopamine agonists as neuroprotective agents in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that results in major motor disturbances due primarily to loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. The mainstream treatment has been dopaminergic replacement therapy aimed at symptomatic relief, with the gold standard drug being the dopamine precursor levodopa. The general dogma has been that levodopa works primarily by indirectly activating the D(2) family of dopamine receptors. Recently, a number of direct dopamine agonists that target the D(2) and D(3) dopamine receptors have been used as dopaminergic replacement strategies. Although these direct D(2) and D(3) drugs cause only modest improvement in motor function compared to levodopa, they can delay the initiation of levodopa and can act synergistically with levodopa. In addition, they can delay the onset of levodopa-related motor complications. Recent imaging data also suggest that they may have neuroprotective effects. Whereas D(2)/D(3) agonists have received much attention as several drugs are available for clinical trials and usage, there has been a large body of data showing that the D(1) receptor actually may play a larger role in restoration of normal motor function. This review examines the current use of dopamine D(2)/D(3) agonists in treatment of PD and their potential for providing neuroprotection. Furthermore, we also examine the potential that D(1) agonists might have in neuroprotective actions in the disease progression.     

Pathophysiology and biochemistry of dyskinesia: clues for the development of non-dopaminergic treatments

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia is a major therapeutic problem in the long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease. The development of dyskinesia is dependent on the extent of nigral denervation but can be induced through both D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors. Short-acting dopamine agonists producing pulsatile receptor stimulation are more likely to induce dyskinesia than long-acting drugs that produce continuous receptor stimulation. However, there are no consistent changes in dopamine receptors which explain the occurrence of dyskinesia. Rather, dyskinesia may originate from an imbalance between the major striatal output pathways. Indeed, levodopa and dopamine agonist drugs show a differential ability to alter striatal output as judged by mRNA for colocalised neuropeptides. The involvement of striatal output pathways raises the possibility of utilising a range of non-dopaminergic receptors within the striatum and in output nuclei as targets for novel drug therapies which may be antiparkinsonian without eliciting dyskinesia. For example, the A2a adenosine antagonist KW6002 reverses motor deficits in primates treated with MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) without provoking an established dyskinesia. Similarly, manipulation of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the striatum can alter the intensity and components of dyskinesia. Neurotrophic therapies diminish dyskinesia since glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) produces a decrease in motor disability in MPTP-treated primates associated with a reduced intensity of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. The mechanisms underlying the manifestations and the priming process for dyskinesia remain unknown, but non-dopaminergic approaches to therapy may provide an effective way of preventing, or limiting, the expression of involuntary movements in Parkinson's disease.     

ABT-431, a D1 receptor agonist prodrug, has efficacy in Parkinson's disease.

Studies in animal models show a selective D1 receptor agonist with full functional efficacy compared with dopamine to have antiparkinsonian efficacy of similar magnitude to levodopa, without the same propensity for inducing dyskinesia. To date, no such agent has been tested in humans. ABT-431 is the prodrug of A-86929, a full, selective D1 receptor agonist. Subjects (n = 14) with levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease received five doses of ABT-431 (5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg) and one of placebo after a 12-hour levodopa holiday. Response was assessed by using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subsection. Dyskinesia was separately graded. ABT-431 showed efficacy significantly superior to placebo at doses of 10 mg and more, and of similar magnitude to that seen with levodopa. Dyskinesia was reduced in several patients after receiving ABT-431. There were no serious adverse events, the most common minor events being nausea and emesis, dizziness, and hypotension. Assuming that ABT-431 is not transformed in humans into an unknown active D2 metabolite, and remains selective for D1 receptors, it is the first dopamine D1 receptor agonist to demonstrate a full antiparkinsonian effect in patients with Parkinson's disease. These preliminary findings also suggest that it may exhibit a reduced tendency to provoke dyskinesia. The emergence of a well-tolerated D1 agonist should allow for the development of a better understanding of the relation between motor efficacy and dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease.     

Stimulation of cannabinoid receptors reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the MPTP-lesioned nonhuman primate model of Parkinson's disease.

Long-term treatment with levodopa in Parkinson's disease results in the development of motor fluctuations, including reduced duration of antiparkinsonian action and involuntary movements, i.e., levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Cannabinoid receptors are concentrated in the basal ganglia, and stimulation of cannabinoid receptors can increase gamma-aminobutyric acid transmission in the lateral segment of globus pallidus and reduce glutamate release in the striatum. We thus tested the hypothesis that the cannabinoid receptor agonist nabilone (0.01, 0.03, and 0.10 mg/kg) would alleviate levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine hydrochloride (MPTP) -lesioned marmoset model of Parkinson's disease. Coadministration of nabilone (0.1 mg/kg) with levodopa was associated with significantly less total dyskinesia (dyskinesia score, 12; range, 6-17; primate dyskinesia rating scale) than levodopa alone (22; range, 14-23; P < 0.05). This effect was more marked during the onset period (0-20 minutes post levodopa). There was no reduction in the antiparkinsonian action of levodopa. Furthermore, the intermediate dose of nabilone used (0.03 mg/kg) increased the duration of antiparkinsonian action of levodopa by 76%. Thus, cannabinoid receptor agonists may be useful in the treatment of motor complications in Parkinson's disease.     

How to succeed in using dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine receptor agonists are assuming increased importance in the treatment of both early and advanced symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, tolerability of these drugs can be a problem. Identifying patients who are at increased risk of adverse effects is central to using dopamine agonists in PD. The newer agonists, pramipexole and ropinirole, are generally adequate without levodopa for early symptoms and carry the hope for a more acceptable profile of long-term side-effects. In the patient with advanced disease, all four dopamine agonists significantly augment the response to levodopa, which reduces the problems of motor fluctuations and drug related dyskinesia. Understanding the common pitfalls when prescribing these drugs will facilitate their safety and efficacy.     

Pulsatile or continuous dopaminomimetic strategies in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa is the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) for both motor and non-motor control. Pulsatile levodopa administration likely contributes to the development of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia after a few years. All studies comparing levodopa versus dopamine agonist early therapy indicate that initiation with agonists is associated with a reduced risk of motor complications - in particular, dyskinesias - possibly because agonists' longer half-lives provide continuous dopaminergic delivery. Indeed, this therapeutic strategy may delay the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia which is essential to maintaining satisfactory quality of life. In advanced disease various levodopa-based strategies may be tried to control motor complications, such as dose fragmentation (smaller, more frequent dosing) or the use of orally administered, liquid levodopa formulations that may reduce off-time intervals or facilitate absorption. More recently introduced, continuous levodopa delivery by duodenal infusion (but also apomorphine infusion) may represent a more effective approach to treat motor complications in advanced PD, and its effect can be perceived by improvement both in clinical scales as well as in health-related items. Infusion therapies may reverse motor complications in complicated patients with significant benefit on quality of life.     

Treatment of Parkinson''s disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.     

Rationale for dopamine agonist use as monotherapy in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are increasingly being used in the initial treatment of patients with de-novo Parkinson's disease because they provide symptom relief and a low risk of the dyskinesia frequently associated with levodopa. Evidence is also mounting in preclinical models that dopamine agonists protect dopaminergic neurons from the toxic effects of oxidative stress and the by-products of dopamine and L-dopa metabolism. Ergot derivatives, such as pergolide, induce minor side-effects and provide significant and sustained improvements in motor function in patients with early Parkinson's disease. Dopamine agonists also appear to reduce the loss of functional dopamine transporters when used early in the disease course, and these factors combine to build a case for the use of dopamine agonists in early-stage Parkinson's disease.     

Pathogenesis of levodopa-induced dyskinesia: focus on D1 and D3 dopamine receptors

Involuntary movements, or dyskinesia, represent a debilitating complication of levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease. Taking advantage of a monkey brain bank constituted to study the pathophysiology of levodopa-induced dyskinesia, we here report the changes affecting D1, D2 and D3 dopamine receptors within the striatum of four experimental groups of non-human primates: normal, parkinsonian, parkinsonian treated with levodopa without or with dyskinesia. We also report the possible role of arrestin and G protein-coupled receptor kinases.     

Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are highly effective as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease and have rapidly gained popularity as a monotherapy in the early stages of Parkinson's disease for patients less than 65-70 years old. In the latter case, dopamine agonists are about as effective as levodopa but patients demonstrate a lower tendency to develop motor complications. However, dopamine agonists lose efficacy over time and the number of patients remaining on agonist monotherapy decreases to less than 50% after 3 years of treatment. Thus, after a few years of treatment the majority of patients who started on dopamine agonists will be administered levodopa, in a combined dopaminergic therapy, in order to achieve a better control of motor symptoms.     

Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients: The PELMOPET study.

Dopamine agonists are used as initial treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to reduce incidence and severity of motor complications. This paradigm is based on long-term studies, allowing "rescue" therapy with levodopa. The present strict monotherapy study (PELMOPET, the acronym for the pergolide-versus-L-dopa-monotherapy-and-positron-emission-tomography trial) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus levodopa without levodopa "rescue" medication. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 3-year trial compared pergolide monotherapy (n=148) with levodopa monotherapy (n=146) in dopamine-naive patients with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Primary efficacy measures were clinical efficacy, severity and time to onset of motor complications, and disease progression. During the 3 years, severity of motor complications was significantly lower and time to onset of dyskinesia was significantly delayed in the group receiving pergolide (3.23 mg/day) compared with those receiving levodopa (504 mg/day). However, time to onset of motor complications was not longer in patients receiving pergolide after 3 years. Symptomatic relief (assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS], UPDRS II, and III, Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] severity, and CGI and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement) was significantly greater in patients receiving levodopa. Adverse events led to discontinuation of therapy in 17.6% of pergolide patients and 9.6% of levodopa patients. This is the first study comparing strict monotherapy with a dopamine agonist versus levodopa in previously untreated early PD. In principle, both levodopa and a dopamine agonist such as pergolide seem to be suitable options as initial PD therapy. The choice remains with the treating physician based on the different efficacy and adverse event profiles.     

Drug insight: Continuous dopaminergic stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Continuous dopaminergic stimulation is a therapeutic strategy for the management of Parkinson's disease, which proposes that dopaminergic agents that provide continuous stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors will delay or prevent the onset of levodopa-related motor complications. Dopaminergic neurons in the basal ganglia normally fire in a random but continuous manner, so that striatal dopamine concentrations are maintained at a relatively constant level. In the dopamine-depleted state, however, intermittent oral doses of levodopa induce discontinuous stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors. This pulsatile stimulation leads to molecular and physiologic changes in basal ganglia neurons and the development of motor complications. These effects are reduced or avoided when dopaminergic therapies are delivered in a more continuous and physiologic manner. Studies in primate models and patients with Parkinson's disease have shown that continuous or long-acting dopaminergic agents are associated with a decreased risk of motor complications compared with short-acting dopamine agonists or levodopa formulations. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation can be achieved with a continuous infusion, but infusion therapies are cumbersome and not likely to be acceptable to patients with early disease. The current challenge is to develop a long-acting oral formulation of levodopa that provides comparable anti-parkinsonian benefits without motor complications.     

Continuous dopamine-receptor treatment of Parkinson's disease: scientific rationale and clinical implications

Levodopa-induced motor complications are a common source of disability for patients with Parkinson's disease. Evidence suggests that motor complications are associated with non-physiological, pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors. In healthy brains, dopamine neurons fire continuously, striatal dopamine concentrations are relatively constant, and there is continuous activation of dopamine receptors. In the dopamine-depleted state, standard levodopa therapy does not normalise the basal ganglia. Rather, levodopa or other short-acting dopaminergic drugs induce molecular changes and altered neuronal firing patterns in basal ganglia neurons leading to motor complications. The concept of continuous dopaminergic stimulation proposes that continuous delivery of a dopaminergic drug will prevent pulsatile stimulation and avoid motor complications. In monkeys treated with MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) and patients with Parkinson's disease, long-acting or continuous infusion of a dopaminergic drug reduces the risk of motor complications. The current challenge is to develop a long-acting oral formulation of levodopa that provides clinical benefits but avoids motor complications.     

Should levodopa be used anymore?

Levodopa is the most potent dopaminergic oral drug available in clinical practice. After chronic treatment, many patients with Parkinson's disease develop dyskinesia and motor fluctuations which are difficult to manage. It was hoped that introduction of dopaminergic agonists could diminish these side effects while keeping the same efficacy as levodopa. Prospective clinical data do not support this idea with the present drugs. Levodopa remains the most useful treatment and most clinicians believe that it is wise to associate early on levodopa with one of the dopamine agonists.     

Altered D(1) dopamine receptor trafficking in parkinsonian and dyskinetic non-human primates

Dyskinesias represent a debilitating complication of levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). While we recently demonstrated that levodopa-induced dyskinesia results from increased dopamine D(1) receptor-mediated transmission, we also questioned the possible role of subcellular localization of D(1) and D(2) receptors in mediating these effects as we previously showed that D(1) receptors undergo differential trafficking in striatal neurons of non-dyskinetic PD patients. Taking advantage of a monkey brain bank, we here report changes affecting the cellular and subcellular distribution of D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors within the striatum of three experimental groups: normal, parkinsonian and dyskinetic L-dopa-treated parkinsonian animals. Our studies at both light and electron microscopy levels show a recruitment of D(1) receptor at the plasma membrane of striatal neurons in the parkinsonian animals and a strong increase of D(1) expression both at the membrane and in cytoplasm of dyskinetic animals, whereas D(2) receptor distribution is only modestly affected in all conditions. Our results rule out the hypothesis of a pathological overinternalization of dopamine receptors in levodopa-induced dyskinesia but raise the possibility for involvement of D(1) receptors in the priming phenomenon through massive and sudden internalization in response to the first ever administration of L-dopa and for an altered homologous desensitization mechanism in dyskinesia leading to an increased availability of D(1) receptors at membrane. Further experiments including parkinsonian monkeys chronically treated with L-dopa that show no dyskinesia and parkinsonian monkeys treated only once with L-dopa are now necessary to confirm our hypothesis.     

Pathophysiology and biochemistry of dyskinesia: clues for the development of non-dopaminergic treatments

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia is a major therapeutic problem in the long-term treatment of Parkinson’s disease. The development of dyskinesia is dependent on the extent of nigral denervation but can be induced through both D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors. Short-acting dopamine agonists producing pulsatile receptor stimulation are more likely to induce dyskinesia than long-acting drugs that produce continuous receptor stimulation. However, there are no consistent changes in dopamine receptors which explain the occurrence of dyskinesia. Rather, dyskinesia may originate from an imbalance between the major striatal output pathways. Indeed, levodopa and dopamine agonist drugs show a differential ability to alter striatal output as judged by mRNA for co-localised neuropeptides. The involvement of striatal output pathways raises the possibility of utilising a range of non-dopaminergic receptors within the striatum and in output nuclei as targets for novel drug therapies which may be anti-parkinsonian without eliciting dyskinesia. For example, the A2a adenosine antagonist KW6002 reverses motor deficits in primates treated with MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) without provoking an established dyskinesia. Similarly, manipulation of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the striatum can alter the intensity and components of dyskinesia. Neurotrophic therapies diminish dyskinesia since glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) produces a decrease in motor disability in MPTP-treated primates associated with a reduced intensity of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. The mechanisms underlying the manifestations and the priming process for dyskinesia remain unknown, but non-dopaminergic approaches to therapy may provide an effective way of preventing, or limiting, the expression of involuntary movements in Parkinson’s disease.

     

Ropinirole versus L-DOPA effects on striatal opioid peptide precursors in a rodent model of Parkinson's disease: implications for dyskinesia

The dopamine precursor, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), remains the most common treatment for Parkinson's disease. However, following long-term treatment, disabling side effects, particularly L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias, are encountered. Conversely, D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonists, such as ropinirole, exert an anti-parkinsonian effect while eliciting less dyskinesia when administered de novo in Parkinson's disease patients. Parkinson's disease and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia are both associated with changes in mRNA and peptide levels of the opioid peptide precursors preproenkephalin-A (PPE-A) and preproenkephalin-B (PPE-B). Furthermore, a potential role of abnormal opioid peptide transmission in dyskinesia is suggested due to the ability of opioid receptor antagonists to reduce the L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in animal models of Parkinson's disease. In this study, the behavioural response, striatal topography and levels of expression of the opioid peptide precursors PPE-A and PPE-B were assessed, following repeated vehicle, ropinirole, or L-DOPA administration in the 6-OHDA-lesioned rat model of Parkinson's disease. While repeated administration of L-DOPA significantly elevated PPE-B mRNA levels (313% cf. vehicle, 6-OHDA-lesioned rostral striatum; 189% cf. vehicle, 6-OHDA-lesioned caudal striatum) in the unilaterally 6-OHDA-lesioned rat model of Parkinson's disease, ropinirole did not. These data and previous studies suggest the involvement of enhanced opioid transmission in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and that part of the reason why D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonists have a reduced propensity to elicit dyskinesia may reside in their reduced ability to elevate opioid transmission.