Exacerbation of postdural puncture headache after epidural blood patch

The purpose of this report is to describe a new complication of epidural blood patch for inadvertent dural puncture. A dural tap in an obstetric patient was managed initially with a prophylactic blood patch via the epidural catheter. Despite this, 48 hr later, she developed post-dural puncture headache, neck, and shoulder pain, and was given a second epidural blood patch. This was followed by an immediate and severe exacerbation of her symptoms, which later resolved after the administration of diclofenac. There were no further sequelae. Although severe complications of epidural blood patch are rare, they are alarming. Exacerbation of the original symptoms of post-dural puncture headache caused by, or following, epidural blood patching has not previously been reported.     

Efficacy of epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache

This prospective investigation was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different volumes of epidural blood patch (EBP) for treatment of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in 81 consecutive patients. In the first part of the investigation (Study part I), 10 ml of blood was injected for EBP in 28 patients. In the second randomized part of the investigation (Study part II), the patients were allocated to receive for EBP either 10 ml (27 patients) or 10–15 ml (26 patients), according to the height of the patient. The procedure was considered initially successful if PDPH disappeared completely during the 2–h recovery room follow–up. To evaluate the long–term success, a questionnaire was mailed to all patients. The EBP performed 3.7± 2.9 days following the dural puncture was initially successful in 88–96% of the patients in the different study groups. In the questionnaire, only 50–68% of the patients reported that PDPH had disappeared immediately without recurrence. In 16–36% of the patients the PDPH returned at lesser intensity and in 14–17% PDPH was reported to have continued, disappearing gradually in all patients. Despite this, 87% of all patients were satisfied with the EBP treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. The results indicate that a larger, height–adjusted volume of blood for EBP in adults does not produce a better effect on PDPH compared to a standard 10–ml volume. Despite the excellent initial effect (91%) seen in our patients, a permanent effect of the blood patch was only achieved in 61%.     

Fluoroscopically guided epidural blood patch in patients with postdural puncture headache after spinal and epidural anesthesia

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the major complications after spinal and epidural anesthesia. An epidural blood patch (EBP) may be applied when PDPH persists regardless of conservative treatment. We describe the results of management including fluoroscopically guided EBP in a series of patients with moderate to severe PDPH. From January 2007 to December 2009, PDPH developed in 15 of 3,381 patients (0.44%) who received epidural or spinal anesthesia: 5 (0.21%) after general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia, 8 (0.81%) after spinal anesthesia, and 2 (3.14%) after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Of 15 patients, PDPH was relieved without the EBP in 9 patients and 6 patients required the EBP. EBP was performed under fluoroscopy in a prone position; a 4:1 mixture of autologous blood and contrast medium was injected to cover the site of dural puncture. The success rate of fluoroscopically guided EBP was 100% with a mean blood volume of 7.2 ml. No complications were associated with EBP except for a mild backache. Fluoroscopically guided EBP may be successfully and safely performed to treat persistent PDPH with a relatively small volume of blood for epidural injection.     

Management of postdural puncture headache with epidural blood patch in children

BACKGROUND: Until the last decade, it was believed that postdural puncture headache (PDPH) was an uncommon complaint in children, but recent studies indicate that young children may develop PDPH after spinal puncture. When the symptoms are severe and are not relieved within a few days with analgesics, forced hydration and bed rest, then epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. METHODS: In this retrospective survey, we analysed EBP performed in Kuopio University Hospital between the years 1995 and 2000. RESULTS: During the 6-year period, seven EBP were performed in children aged 12 years or younger. Four out of the seven children had undergone a diagnostic spinal puncture, two had spinal anaesthesia and one child had spinal puncture for treatment of postoperative hygroma. Five children had a typical PDPH, one child had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache and one child had a headache similar to his migraine. EBP was performed 2-19 days after spinal puncture with 0.3 ml.kg-1 (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. CONCLUSIONS: EBP gave some relief of symptoms in all children. No complications related to EBP were noticed.     

Prophylactic epidural blood patch after unintentional dural puncture for the prevention of postdural puncture headache in parturients

Unintentional dural puncture is a source of significant morbidity in obstetric patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia. In this focused review, we discuss the use of a prophylactic epidural blood patch to prevent postdural puncture headache, particularly as it relates to the obstetric population. Although epidural blood patch is thought to be an effective treatment for postdural puncture headache, there is insufficient evidence to support its use as a prophylactic procedure.     

All patients with a postdural puncture headache should receive an epidural blood patch

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is an important complication of obstetric epidural anaesthesia and analgesia. Though often self-limiting, PDPH is unpleasant, at times incapacitating, and associated with complications, some of which are serious. Despite this, treatment options are few and of limited efficacy. The epidural blood patch (EBP) has been used for PDPH treatment for over 50 years.¹ It is probably the most efficacious of therapies, although this is unproven, and plays an important part in the management of this condition.² However, PDPH is often complex, of variable severity and duration, and merits a cautious and individualized approach to its diagnosis and treatment. An EBP may be part of that treatment but administering it to all women with PDPH is not the optimal management approach.     

Epidural blood patch for management of postdural puncture headache in adolescents

BACKGROUND: In some patients spinal puncture (SP) is followed by postdural puncture headache (PDPH). When the symptoms of PDPH are severe and are not relieved within a few days an epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. The aim of this survey was to review requests for EBPs and to evaluate the effectiveness of EBP in patients aged 13-18 years during a 6.5 year period ending in June 2001. METHODS: The Information System Patient Measures Database was interrogated to identify patients who were referred for EBP. After identification, the patients' medical records were reviewed in detail for the characteristics of PDPH and other symptoms, and for the effectiveness of the EBP. RESULTS: Forty-two EBPs were performed after 40 SPs on 37 patients (24 girls, 13 boys). Epidural blood patches were performed twice in five patients. The reasons for repeating the procedure were repeat SP with new PDPH in three patients and an unsatisfactory effect in two patients. Twenty-eight of the 40 spinal punctures (70%) had been performed for diagnostic use and 10 (25%) for spinal anesthesia. Two patients (5%) developed PDPH after inadvertent dural puncture with an epidural needle. In 37 cases the criteria for PDPH were fulfilled, and one patient had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache. Two-thirds of the girls had associated symptoms of headache compared with one-third of the boys. Epidural blood patch was performed 1-22 days after SP with 0.2 ml/kg (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. The success rate of the first injection was 37 out of 40 EBP (93%), and the second injection was effective in both patients with recurred PDPH. CONCLUSION: Epidural blood patch seems to be an effective and safe procedure in adolescents for treating severe and persistent PDPH.     

Epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache in a five-year-old child

A case was presented of a 5-year-old girl who suffered an accidental dural puncture during placement of an epidural catheter under general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. She complained of headache 4 days after the operation, which was relieved on supine position but became worse on sitting position. Her symptoms failed to respond to conservative management. An epidural blood patch was performed under general anesthesia and completely resolved her symptoms. The reported incidence of epidural blood patch for post dural puncture headache following accidental dural puncture in children is low. We outline this case and the consideration for management for epidural blood patch in pediatric patients.     

Management of persistent post-dural puncture headache after repeated epidural blood patch

We report a case of persistent post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in a patient despite two epidural blood patches (EBPs). Successful resolution of headache was achieved with a third EBP performed under computed tomography (CT) guidance. A 38-year-old female had a total abdominal hysterectomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with no complications. After surgery, she developed a postural headache consistent with PDPH. The first EBP was performed by injecting autologous blood through the epidural catheter that was in situ. The second EBP was performed under fluoroscopy. The patient continued to have a persistent headache. A computed tomography (CT) myelogram demonstrated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak at L3-4 level. A "directed" CT-guided blood patch was then performed successfully with resolution of the headache.     

Subdural haematoma after dural puncture headache treated by epidural blood patch

Subdural haematoma is a well-documented complication of accidentaldural puncture, and is thought to be preventable by prompt treatmentwith an epidural blood patch. An accidental dural puncture occurredin a 39-yr-old primagravida during the siting of an epiduralcatheter for pain relief in labour. Twenty hours after the puncture,the mother developed a typical post-dural puncture headache,which increased in severity over the subsequent 24 h. An epiduralblood patch was performed at 48 h, and this initially relievedthe headache. After discharge from hospital, and 14 days afterthe dural puncture, the headache recurred, together with expressivedysphasia, poor co-ordination and sensory loss in the rightarm. A magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrated a left sidedsubdural haematoma, which was drained successfully with completerecovery. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 720–3     

Accidental dural puncture,postdural puncture headache,intrathecal catheters,and epidural blood patch: revisiting the old nemesis

One of the controversial management options for accidental dural puncture in pregnant patients is the conversion of labor epidural analgesia to continuous spinal analgesia by threading the epidural catheter intrathecally. No clear consensus exists on how to best prevent severe headache from occurring after accidental dural puncture. To investigate whether the intrathecal placement of an epidural catheter following accidental dural puncture impacts the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the subsequent need for an epidural blood patch in parturients. A retrospective chart review of accidental dural puncture was performed at Hutzel Women’s Hospital in Detroit, MI, USA for the years 2002–2010. Documented cases of accidental dural punctures (N = 238) were distributed into two groups based on their management: an intrathecal catheter (ITC) group in which the epidural catheter was inserted intrathecally and a non-intrathecal catheter (non-ITC) group that received the epidural catheter inserted at different levels of lumbar interspaces. The incidence of PDPH as well as the necessity for epidural blood patch was analyzed using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. In the non-ITC group, 99 (54 %) parturients developed PDPH in comparison to 20 (37 %) in the ITC [odds ratio (OR), 1.98; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.06–3.69; P = 0.03]. Fifty-seven (31 %) of 182 patients in the non-ITC group required an epidural blood patch (EBP) (data for 2 patients of 184 were missing). In contrast, 7 (13 %) of parturients in the ITC group required an EBP. The incidence of EBP was calculated in parturients who actually developed headache to be 57 of 99 (57 %) in the non-ITC group versus 7 of 20 (35 %) in the ITC group (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI, 0.92–6.68; P = 0.07). The insertion of an intrathecal catheter following accidental dural puncture decreases the incidence of PDPH but not the need for epidural blood patch in parturients.     

Effect of the continuous epidural saline infusion for patients with postdural puncture headache after pulmonary resection

The dual puncture is one of the diseaseful complications at the induction of the epidural anesthesia, which causes severe symptoms of intracranial hypotension such as headache and nausea. The clinical courses of 3 patients with the dual puncture symptoms after pulmonary resections were retrospectively reviewed, and the effect of the continuous epidural saline infusion treatment (CESI) for the dual puncture was evaluated. Pneumococcal empyema developed in 1 patient who had been treated with conservative management. In contrast, the symptoms of the others who were treated with the CESI were quickly recovered or were effectively prevented. This report strongly suggested that the CESI was convenient and effective treatment for dual punctune symptoms by suppressing the cerebrospinal fluid leakage by elevation of the fluid pressure in the extradural space.