Oral methotrexate in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: We performed an audit of methotrexate for ulcerative colitis, because efficacy is unclear. Aim : To investigate the role of methotrexate in the management of ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Patients with ulcerative colitis treated with oral methotrexate at the inflammatory bowel disease clinics of Oxford and Wycombe General Hospital, UK, were evaluated. Efficacy was defined by remission (complete steroid withdrawal for >3 months) and response (good, partial or nil, proportionate reduction of steroids). RESULTS: There were 50 patients (42 ulcerative colitis alone; eight had rheumatoid arthritis associated with ulcerative colitis and were analysed separately). Indications for methotrexate in ulcerative colitis alone were azathioprine intolerance (31 of 42) and lack of benefit from azathioprine (11 of 42). The mean dose of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis alone was 19.9 mg/week for a median of 30 weeks (range: 7-395). Remission occurred in 42%. The response was good in 54% and partial in 18%. Side-effects occurred in 23%; 10% stopped treatment because of side-effects. Of those treated with methotrexate because of treatment failure with azathioprine, three of 11 achieved remission, but four came to colectomy within 90 days of starting methotrexate. The colitis remained in remission in seven of eight of those with RA treated with methotrexate and ulcerative colitis (mean dose 15.0 mg/week). CONCLUSION: Oral methotrexate (approximately 20 mg/week) is well-tolerated and moderately effective in steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis.     

Short- and long-term outcome of patients treated with cyclosporin for severe acute ulcerative colitis

Background:

Recent evidence suggests that the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin may be of benefit in treating patients with severe colitis who are steroid resistant. Although cyclosporin appears to be effective in reducing colectomy rates in the short term, few data are available on the long-term follow-up of such patients.

Aim:

To investigate the short- and long-term outcome of patients with severe steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis treated with cyclosporin who were otherwise being considered for colectomy.

Methods:

Twenty-two patients with severe steroid-resistant exacerbations of ulcerative colitis who were being considered for colectomy were treated with cyclosporin (4 mg/kg i.v.) daily for 7 days followed by oral treatment (6 mg/kg/day) if colectomy was avoided.

Results:

Twenty of 22 patients (91%) avoided colectomy during their initial hospital admission. With a mean follow-up period of 39 months (range 31–59), eight of these patients have subsequently relapsed and required colectomy and 12 patients have avoided colectomy (53%). Of the 12 patients avoiding colectomy, seven have successfully been weaned on to azathioprine while five are maintained on an aminosalicylate alone. None of these long-term responders require maintenance corticosteroids. The main side-effects during treatment with cyclosporin were headaches (six patients, 27%), paraesthesia and tremors (four patients, 18%) and hypertension (four patients, 18%). Two patients developed renal impairment on cyclosporin which resolved on lowering the dose. In no case was cyclosporin discontinued because of an adverse reaction. No clinical or laboratory features could be identified that predicted which patients treated with cyclosporin would later require colectomy.

Conclusion:

This study shows that cyclosporin is a viable alternative to emergency colectomy in severe ulcerative colitis in the short term. Although these benefits are not maintained in all patients, more than half were found to avoid colectomy in the longer term.

     

The use of 6-mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease after failure of azathioprine therapy

INTRODUCTION: Azathioprine is a useful therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease that is difficult to control. However, 10% of patients are unable to tolerate azathioprine, and the best form of treatment for this group of patients is unknown. The azathioprine metabolite 6-mercaptopurine may be a useful therapy for these patients. AIM: To review our clinical experience of the use of the 6-mercaptopurine in inflammatory bowel disease patients who are intolerant of azathioprine. METHODS: All patients who were prescribed 6-mercaptopurine in a 2-year period were identified from pharmacy records. The case notes were reviewed and those who had previously been intolerant of azathioprine were included. RESULTS: A total of 19 with either ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease were included. The reasons for discontinuing azathioprine were side-effects (13 patients), failure of efficacy (four patients) and leucopenia (two patients). Eleven of the 19 patients (68%) tolerated 6-mercaptopurine, including seven out of 13 patients (54%) who discontinued azathioprine due to side-effects. The length of follow-up of patients on 6-mercaptopurine was between 126 and 780 days (median 390 days). DISCUSSION: 6-mercaptopurine should be considered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who require continuing immunosuppressive therapy, but are intolerant of azathioprine.     

Azathioprine or methotrexate in the treatment of patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis: results of an open-label study on efficacy and tolerability in inducing and maintaining remission

BACKGROUND: The role of azathioprine and methotrexate in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis is still controversial. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of these two drugs in a series of patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Forty-two patients were treated with a daily dose of azathioprine (2 mg/kg) and, if intolerant or not responding, with methotrexate (12.5 mg/week intramuscularly), and their efficacy was established by clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations at 6 months. Patients achieving clinical remission continued with treatment and were followed up. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients on azathioprine, 10 experienced early side-effects requiring withdrawal from treatment, 22 (69%) achieved complete remission, six (19%) achieved improvement and four (12%) obtained no substantial benefit. Methotrexate, administered to eight patients intolerant to and two patients resistant to azathioprine, induced complete remission in six patients (60%) and improvement in four (40%). During follow-up, a larger number of patients on azathioprine relapsed in comparison with patients on methotrexate [16/28 (57%) vs. 2/10 (20%), respectively; P < 0.05]. Only minor side-effects were observed on both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Azathioprine is effective in patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis. Methotrexate seems to be a good alternative in patients intolerant to or not responding to azathioprine.     

Long-term risk of malignancy after treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with azathioprine

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data from renal transplant and rheumatoid arthritis patients suggest that there is an increased risk of malignancy after treatment with azathioprine. Whether this is true for patients with inflammatory bowel disease remains uncertain. METHOD: A retrospective review of clinical notes was performed. RESULTS: Azathioprine was given to 626 of 2204 patients (855 with Crohn's disease and 1349 with ulcerative colitis). The mean total duration of azathioprine use was 27 months. The mean follow-up from diagnosis was 13.7 years and the mean follow-up from the start of azathioprine treatment was 6.9 years. Thirty-one cancers were observed in 30 patients treated with azathioprine (4.5%) and 77 cancers were observed in 70 patients not treated with azathioprine (4.5%; P=N.S.). Logistic regression analysis (including in the model the age, sex, diagnosis and extent of disease) showed that treatment with azathioprine did not significantly affect the risk of the development of cancer. Eight patients had lymphoma; three had been given azathioprine (P=N.S.). For patients with ulcerative colitis, the number of colorectal cancers (including high-grade dysplasia) in patients given azathioprine was eight of 355 (2.2%), compared with 28 of 994 (2.8%) for patients not given azathioprine (P=N.S.). The cumulative risk of colorectal cancer or dysplasia/dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (adjusted to exclude post-colectomy patients) after 10, 20, 30 and 40 years of ulcerative colitis was 0.4%, 1.3%, 9%and 15.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: No increased risk of cancer diagnosis following azathioprine treatment was observed.     

Low-dose intravenous azathioprine may be effective in the management of acute fulminant colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: The management of acute fulminant colitis unresponsive to intravenous steroids is usually surgical. However, recent evidence suggests that intravenous administration of azathioprine at very high doses may allow more rapid onset of clinical efficacy, although its use has not previously been reported in the emergency situation. AIM: To report the successful use of intravenous azathioprine in the management of acute fulminant colitis complicating both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. METHOD: We initially used intravenous azathioprine because of the refusal of the family of the first patient to accept surgery following failure of conventional medical management. Importantly the azathioprine was successful at the low dose of 3 mg/kg.day, equivalent to standard oral doses. Two subsequent patients demonstrated a similar resolution. All were weaned successfully to oral azathioprine and have remained in long-term endoscopic and histological remission. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that low-dose intravenous azathioprine may be helpful adjunct therapy in selected cases of severe fulminant colitis. However, the need for close monitoring and daily surgical assessment remains paramount, and a formal trial of low-dose intravenous azathioprine is required before it may be more widely recommended.     

Recurrent atrial fibrillation in a patient with ulcerative colitis treated with azathioprine: case report and review of the literature

We present a clinical case report regarding recurrent atrial fibrillation in a patient with ulcerative colitis treated with azathioprine. Atrial fibrillation represents the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, occurring in 1-2% of the general population and characterized by seemingly disorganized atrial depolarizations without effective atrial contraction. Several mechanisms determine this arrhythmia; in particular remodelling (structural, mechanical and electrical alteration related to atrial fibrillation). The pro-arrhythmic effect of azathioprine may be evaluated during immunosuppressive therapy to be aware of this serious but reversible adverse effect.     

Comparative tolerability of therapies for ulcerative colitis.

This article reviews the clinical pharmacology, adverse events, and comparative tolerability of the drugs commonly available for treating ulcerative colitis. Synthetic glucocorticoids are the most commonly used conventional corticosteroids in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Corticosteroids can be expected to impact on every organ system and most metabolic activities of the body. Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is common, but reversible, with conventional corticosteroids, but not with newer topically-acting corticosteroids. A serious complication of corticosteroids in children is growth retardation. The frequent adverse effects associated with the use of corticosteroids have prompted the development of a new group of rectal agents with equivalent efficacy and a more benign adverse event profile such as prednisolone metasulfobenzoate, fluticasone propionate, tixocortol pivalate, beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide. The incidence of adverse effects related to the use of sulfasalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid plus sulfapyridine) is high and is dose related. The most frequently reported adverse effect is intolerance, not allergy, and relates to the sulfapyridine moiety correlating with the acetylator phenotype. Tolerance to 5-aminosalicylic acid by 80 to 90% of those patients allergic to, or intolerant of, sulfasalazine has given further evidence suggesting that the sulfa moiety is responsible for much of the toxicity of sulfasalazine. However, 10 to 20% of patients who are sulfasalazine intolerant have similar reactions to 5-aminosalicylic acid formulations, indicating that the 5-aminosalicylic acid moiety is responsible for adverse events in some patients taking sulfasalazine. Adverse effects resulting from treatment with azathioprine and mercaptopurine can be divided into two categories: allergic-type reactions that appear to be dose-independent and nonallergic-type reactions that are probably dose- and metabolism-dependent. It is well established now that genotype and thiopurine methyltransferase activity have an important impact on the rate of adverse effects during azathioprine or mercaptopurine therapy. Adverse effects resulting from high dose cyclosporin therapy for inflammatory bowel disease include: renal insufficiency, hypertension, opportunistic infections, seizures, paresthesias, tremor, headache, gingival hyperplasia, hypertrichosis, and anaphylaxis with intravenous cyclosporin. In contrast, the incidence of adverse events was relatively low when low-dose oral cyclosporin was used. The incidence of adverse events associated with any of the medications used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is difficult to assess and it is therefore hard to make a comparative evaluation. The broadening of the drug regimen available to the clinician has advanced our knowledge about the disease, and further development of more effective, less toxic agents can be anticipated in the future.     

The management of severe ulcerative colitis

Severe ulcerative colitis is a potentially life-threatening condition but the mortality has fallen dramatically over the past 30–40 years. It is now less than 2%, including surgical mortality, and should only be seen in patients with significant co-existing disease. Early recognition of the severity of the colitis, intensive medical therapy, close liaison between physician and surgeon, and prompt surgery when necessary have all contributed to this improved outcome. Despite the use of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids, 20–30% of patients will make a poor response and will require urgent surgery. The use of intravenous cyclosporin has proved effective at reducing the immediate surgical rate in this group of unresponsive patients and appears safe. Whether cyclosporin reduces the need for surgery in the longer term is much less certain. Clinical, radiological, endoscopic and laboratory parameters can now be used to predict the course of a severe attack. These help in the timing of urgent surgery and are potentially helpful in determining when to begin other therapies such as cyclosporin.     

The efficacy of methotrexate for maintaining remission in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who are resistant to or intolerant of azathioprine remains a challenge. Low-dose methotrexate has been shown to be effective in inducing remission in Crohn's disease. AIM: This review was conducted because there are limited long-term follow-up data during and after stopping treatment. There are also limited data on the use of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of clinical notes. Remission was defined as minimal bowel symptoms without the need for oral steroids for 3 months. Relapse was defined as bowel symptoms that required steroid treatment or surgery. RESULTS: Seventy patients were reviewed; 48 had Crohn's disease and 22 had ulcerative colitis. The mean duration of treatment was 17.1 months; the mean maintenance dose was 20 mg weekly. Remission was achieved in 34 of 55 patients who completed more than 3 months of treatment (62%). Life-table analysis showed that the chances of remaining in remission at 12, 24 and 36 months (if treatment was continued) were 90%, 73% and 51%, respectively. The chances of remaining in remission after stopping treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months were 42%, 21% and 16%, respectively. The dose of methotrexate (mg/kg) was associated with the induction of remission (P=0.02). Treatment was equally effective for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance methotrexate treatment gives acceptable remission rates for treatment periods up to 3 years. After stopping treatment, relapse is frequent and occurs early (usually within 1 year).     

Effect of oral tacrolimus (FK 506) on steroid-refractory moderate/severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Steroid refractory ulcerative colitis is most commonly treated with intravenous ciclosporin to avoid colectomy. In search for an alternative drug that can be administered orally we investigated oral tacrolimus (FK 506) for this indication. METHODS: Nine patients with active, moderate/severe steroid refractory UC were treated with oral tacrolimus with a daily dose of 0.15 mg/kg body weight. After patients had responded azathioprine was added for long-term immunosuppression. RESULTS: All patients responded within 1-2 weeks. After 12 weeks of tacrolimus therapy six patients (67%) were in complete remission, two patients (22%) had mild to moderate disease activity, and one patient (11%) underwent colectomy. After a mean follow up of 21 months six of the nine patients (67%) had their colon in situ. Two patients developed severe side-effects, one thrombopenia with intestinal bleeding, and one bicytopenia. Mild side-effects were common. CONCLUSION: Oral tacrolimus may be an effective alternative to intravenous ciclosporin for the therapy of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Patients receiving tacrolimus need to be watched carefully for side-effects.     

New onset of atrial fibrillation after introduction of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis: case report and review of the literature

Case report We present the case of a 52-year-old man with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis, needing immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine. The drug had been started 3 years earlier, but stopped after a few months because the patient reported palpitations, lipothymia, nausea and vomiting. Given the continued steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis and the lack of clinical documentation about a reaction with a dubious relationship to azathioprine, we decided to rechallenge the patient with the drug under clinical monitoring and after informed consent. After starting 50 mg of azathioprine, the patient showed general malaise, nausea and vomiting. An ECG showed atrial fibrillation, and the patient reported that the symptoms were similar to those previously experienced. Discussion We have found two other cases of similar onset of atrial fibrillation after azathioprine use, although some confounding elements in these episodes make the possible causal relationship between the drug and this adverse event uncertain.     

Increased incidence of azathioprine-induced pancreatitis in Crohn's disease compared with other diseases

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine is widely used in Crohn's disease. A major drawback is the occurrence of side-effects, especially acute pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis is rarely seen when azathioprine is used for other diseases than Crohn's disease. AIM: To survey side-effects of azathioprine after liver or renal transplantation, for systemic lupus erythematosis, Wegener's granulomatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. METHODS: A computerized search using the term 'azathioprine' or 'imuran' was performed on the Hospital Information System of the university hospital Groningen, resulting in 1564 patients matching our criteria. RESULTS: Eleven of 224 patients with Crohn's disease experienced acute pancreatitis (4.9%) compared with two of 129 (1.5%) with autoimmune hepatitis, two of 388 (0.5%) after renal transplantation, one of 254 (0.4%) after liver transplantation. Acute pancreatitis was more prevalent in Crohn's disease compared with any other disease. Azathioprine-toxicity necessitating withdrawal occurred significantly (P < 0,05) more in rheumatoid arthritis (78 of 317), ulcerative colitis (20 of 94) and Crohn's disease (52 of 224) compared with systemic lupus erythematosis (five of 73), Wegener's granulomatosis (six of 85), autoimmune hepatitis (eight of 129), after liver transplantation (17 of 254) and after renal transplantation (22 of 388). CONCLUSIONS: Acute pancreatitis is strongly associated with Crohn's disease and rarely occurs with other underlying conditions. Overall azathioprine-induced toxicity and the necessity of withdrawal is more common in inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis compared with other diseases.     

Azathioprine without oral ciclosporin in the long-term maintenance of remission induced by intravenous ciclosporin in severe,steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: Intravenous ciclosporin is considered to be the only alternative to avoid surgery in severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. In responders, some authors recommend a switch to oral ciclosporin to act as a 'bridge' until the therapeutic action of azathioprine is achieved for maintenance treatment. AIM: To report the short- and long-term outcome of intravenous ciclosporin-responsive ulcerative colitis patients treated with oral azathioprine without oral ciclosporin. METHODS: The records of all patients treated with intravenous ciclosporin for severe, steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis were reviewed. Responders following treatment with azathioprine but without oral ciclosporin as maintenance therapy were included. Patients with colonic cytomegalovirus infection and/or follow-up of less than 1 year were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included. Steroids were discontinued in 24 (89%). The median follow-up was 36 months. Eighteen (75%) patients presented mild or moderate relapses, which were easily managed with salicylates or steroids. Cumulative probabilities of relapse were 42%, 72% and 77% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Eleven (40.7%) patients underwent elective colectomy. Cumulative probabilities of colectomy were 29%, 35% and 42% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. No opportunistic infections were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral azathioprine seems to be enough to maintain long-term remission induced by intravenous ciclosporin in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The 'bridging step' with oral ciclosporin may not be necessary in this subset of patients, although a randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm this hypothesis.     

6-tioguanine monitoring in steroid-dependent patients with inflammatory bowel diseases receiving azathioprine

BACKGROUND: 6-Thioguanine (6-tioguanine) nucleotides are the active metabolites of azathioprine. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of clinical remission without steroids in steroid-dependent Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients receiving azathioprine, the medium- and long-term efficacy and the predictive factors of clinical response when monitoring 6-tioguanine. METHODS: Steroid-dependent Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients receiving either azathioprine or not (treated later with a daily dose of 2.5 mg/kg) were prospectively included. 6-tioguanine was monitored at 1 and 2 months and every 3 months thereafter for 1 year. The azathioprine dose was adapted to reach a 6-tioguanine level of >250 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells. Thiopurine methyltransferase genotype/phenotype was evaluated in some patients. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were prospectively included (70 Crohn's disease, 36 ulcerative colitis). The clinical remission rate without steroids in patients receiving azathioprine, in intention-to-treat analysis, was 72% and 59% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The remission rate was significantly higher in patients with 6-tioguanine >250 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC (86% and 69% at 6 and 12 months, respectively; P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients whether treated by azathioprine or not on inclusion. In the univariate analysis, the absence of Crohn's disease stenosis, a 6-tioguanine level >250 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC, and an increase of erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume were the factors predictive of a favourable clinical response. In the multivariate analysis, only a 6-tioguanine level of >250 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells was a predictive factor of favourable clinical remission. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical remission without steroids is significantly more likely when monitoring 6-tioguanine so as to reach a level of >250 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells in steroid-dependent Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients receiving azathioprine (86% and 69% at 6 and 12 months, respectively).     

In-vitro cyclosporin sensitivity of proliferating lymphocytes is predictive of in-vivo therapeutic response in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of cyclosporin in the management of ulcerative colitis is recognized. Not all patients respond to this treatment. Existing clinical and laboratory parameters are of little use in identifying those most likely to respond. AIMS: To determine whether in-vitro sensitivity to cyclosporin as measured by a lymphocyte proliferation assay is predictive of in-vivo response to therapy. METHODS: The study comprised seven responders with ulcerative colitis, seven non-responders, and 14 healthy matched controls. A lymphocyte proliferation assay was carried out in the presence of a range of concentrations of cyclosporin and a dose-response curve constructed for each subject. The IC(50) value, the concentration of cyclosporin that resulted in 50% inhibition of proliferation, was calculated for each subject. IC(50) values for responders, non-responders and controls were compared using a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: There was a wide range of values obtained for the study group as a whole. IC(50) values for non-responders were significantly higher than those of responders (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a population-wide variation of in-vitro sensitivity to cyclosporin. This is reflected in in-vivo sensitivity as measured by clinical response to cyclosporin treatment. Future therapeutic strategies need to address this inherent variability of individual response to therapy.     

Safety and efficacy of azathioprine in the maintenance of ciclosporin-induced remission of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that azathioprine prolongs the response to ciclosporin of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis, but no specific data are available concerning its toxicity in this indication. AIM AND METHODS: The charts of 21 patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis who received azathioprine overlapping with a successful ciclosporin course were reviewed for the onset of toxicity. The controls consisted of 48 initial responders to steroids who received azathioprine for steroid-dependence or resistance/toxicity. RESULTS: Two of the 21 patients were withdrawn because of hypersensitivity to azathioprine. The remaining 19 were treated for a median of 18 months together with a median daily steroid dose of 35 mg (10-75 mg) to be tapered off. Toxicity (31%) included leukopenia alone (two cases), cholestasis alone (one case), cholestasis and increased amylase (one case), increased amylase alone (one case), and cutaneous infection (one case). The frequency of withdrawal was 21%. The mean daily steroid doses were reduced from 38 mg to 3.8 mg in the study cohort, and from 25 mg to 8 mg in the controls, among whom toxicity (27%) included four cases each of leukopenia and increased amylase, two cases each of alteration of liver enzymes and infection, and one case of gastric intolerance. Ten of the 48 controls (20%) were withdrawn from the study. CONCLUSION: Azathioprine is as effective and safe in the maintenance of the response of patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis to ciclosporin as it is in the treatment of those who respond to steroids.     

Review article: systemic and topical steroids in inflammatory bowel disease

Steroids are still widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Pharmacological studies have shown that there is no major abnormality in the pharmacokinetics of steroids in these disorders. Foam preparations with rectal application decrease the bioavailability to low levels, eliminating systemic complications. For oral use, 'nonsystemic' steroids have been developed. In ulcerative colitis, steroids are rarely needed as 5-aminosalicylates are effective in the majority of patients. This is true for rectal application in distal colitis, as well as in more extensive disease. In Crohn's disease, steroids are more often used; however, in population-based studies, less than 50% of patients have been treated with steroids, as there are alternative treatments available for the large group of patients with mild to moderate activity. For those patients needing steroid treatment, budesonide seems to be a good choice in active disease, but has not shown convincing effects in the maintenance of remission over longer periods of time. There is no place for long-term steroid treatment in ulcerative colitis and very little in Crohn's disease--immunosuppression with azathioprine or related drugs is certainly the better alternative.     

Efficacy and safety of thiopurinic immunomodulators (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) in steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of azathioprine in the management of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis is taken for granted. However, study populations frequently include together steroid-dependent and refractory patients. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of thiopurinic immunomodulators in strictly defined steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Survey of 34 patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis, treated with azathioprine according to protocol. Therapeutical success: glucocorticoid withdrawal within 12 months, without steroid requirements during another year. RESULTS: Mean age was 39.1 +/- 17 years. Pancolitis and extensive colitis accounted for 50% of cases. Therapeutic success of immunomodulator treatment reached 70.6%, intention to treat analysis (confidence interval 95%: 52-84%) and 72.7%, as per protocol (confidence interval 95%: 54-86%). Mean time to steroid withdrawal was 4.6 months. In therapy successes, mean corpuscular volume and total serum bilirubin increased with treatment time (P = 0.0001). Fifteen adverse effects were observed in 13 patients (38%). Azathioprine was withdrawn in seven cases (20.6%); in four of them (with liver toxicity), treatment with mercaptopurine was indicated. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with thiopurinic immunomodulators (azathioprine) represents the first option in the management of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. Its efficacy (70%) and its acceptable safety support this view. Increasing mean corpuscular volume and serum bilirubin values may be a surrogate marker of a beneficial effect.     

Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin microemulsion in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a pharmacokinetic profile of cyclosporin microemulsion formulation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 58 consecutive patients (19 women and 39 men), aged 16 to 64 years (mean age 38 years), with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (29 patients) or Crohn's disease (29 patients). METHODS: Patients were treated with oral doses of cyclosporin microemulsion ranging from 200 to 400 mg daily. Blood samples were collected after 7 days of treatment; blood was drawn at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 12 hours after the morning dose. In 23 patients out of 29 with ulcerative colitis and 23 out of 29 with Crohn's disease, these profiles were repeated immediately before hospital discharge, which took place an average of 18 days after admission. Blood specimens were assayed for cyclosporin immunoreactivity on the day of blood withdrawal by a radioimmunoassay technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: In the range of doses employed, the average peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve to 12 hours tended to increase linearly with the dose (from 782.35 to 1,607.98 microg/L and from 3,612 to 7,221 microg x h/L for doses of 200 mg and 400 mg, respectively), whereas the time to Cmax (tmax) and elimination half-life (t 1/2beta) ranged between 78 and 95.2 min and 85.5 and 162 min, respectively, and did not appear to change with the dose. After dose-normalisation by transformation of data into percentage increase over baseline (trough) concentration for each patient, single kinetic parameters for the whole study population (n = 58) could be calculated (Cmax 620% vs baseline. tmax 86.5 min, t 1/2 115 min). Comparison between patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis showed that the latter had higher Cmax values (702% compared with 543% vs baseline, p < 0.05) whereas tmax and t 1/2beta values overlapped. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of cyclosporin microemulsion in patients with inflammatory bowel disease are broadly similar to those previously measured in healthy volunteers and in other disorders requiring cyclosporin treatment.