Aortic repair in Marfan's syndrome: prevention of mechanical leaflets damage

Aortic incompetence in Marfan's syndrome results from distortion or dilatation of the sinuses of Valsalva, annuloaortic ectasia or a combination of these problems. Valve leaflets in these patients are macroscopically normal in spite of aortic insufficiency. Replacement of the ascending aorta, root and aortic valve with a composite graft was, for a long time, the treatment of choice for Marfan patients. Valve-preserving procedures (remodeling or reimplantation) provide the advantages of avoiding the shortcomings of standard surgical techniques, and maintaining the functional integrity of the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, aortic root and ascending aorta. We developed a modified valve-sparing reimplantation technique for avoiding leaflet damage. This was achieved by leaving a 'cushion' of aortic wall (8--10 mm) that, sewn on the Dacron graft, works as a 'damper' and prevents leaflets injury during the systolic opening of the valve. For final judgment of this operative method long-term results are necessary.     

Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to examine the long-term results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome. METHODS: Forty-four patients underwent aortic root replacement and 61 underwent aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysm. Patients who underwent aortic root replacement had more severe symptoms, worse left ventricular function, more severe aortic insufficiency, and larger aortic root aneurysms than did patients who had aortic valve-sparing operations. Two types of valve-sparing operations were performed: reimplantation of the aortic valve in 39 patients and remodeling of the aortic root in 22 patients. Echocardiography was performed annually during follow-up. The mean follow-ups were 75 +/- 54 months for the aortic root replacement group and 49 +/- 38 months for the aortic valve-sparing group. RESULTS: There were 1 early death and 7 late deaths; 6 deaths were in the aortic root replacement group and 2 were in the aortic valve-sparing group. Survivals at 10 years were 87% in the aortic root replacement group and 96% in the aortic valve-sparing group (P =.3). Freedoms from reoperation at 10 years were 75% in the root replacement group and 100% in the valve-sparing group (P =.1). Freedoms from valve-related mortality and morbidity were 65% after root replacement and 100% after valve-sparing operation (P =.02). Freedom from aortic insufficiency greater than 2+ after aortic valve-sparing operations was 75% at 10 years and was similar for both types of valve-sparing operations; however, the diameters of the aortic annulus and neoaortic sinuses increased only after the remodeling procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that aortic valve-sparing operations provide similar survival but lower rates of valve-related complications than aortic root replacement for patients with Marfan syndrome. Reimplantation of the aortic valve may be more appropriate than remodeling of the aortic root to prevent dilation of the aortic annulus, and for this reason we now use only this technique to treat patients with Marfan syndrome.     

Aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty: a useful adjunct to a standardized aortic valve-sparing procedure?

OBJECTIVE: Dilation of aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction (STJ) diameters are the characteristic lesions of aortic root aneurysm. The remodeling technique reduces STJ diameter and creates three neosinuses of Valsalva. Alternatively, the reimplantation technique reduces both annulus and STJ diameters to the detriment of aortic root dynamics. Although the remodeling technique is recognized as the most physiological valve-sparing procedure, aortic annulus dilation may jeopardize its results. A standardized approach that combines an external subvalvular aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty with the remodeling technique is suggested. METHODS: Eighty-three patients underwent an elective aortic root remodeling procedure, either isolated (group 1, n=34) or combined with an external subvalvular aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty (group 2, n=49). Preoperative aortic regurgitation was 1.59+/-1.1 (group 1) and 1.97+/-1.3 (group 2) (NS). The aortic annulus was more dilated in group 2 than in group 1 (27+/-2.77 mm vs 26.4+/-2.3 mm, p<0.01). Residual aortic regurgitation > or =grade II was the conversion criteria for aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 3.6% (n=3). Intraoperative conversion for valve replacement was 32.7% in group 1 (n=11) versus 4.2% in group 2 (n=2) (p<0.001). In group 1, preoperative annulus diameter was larger for converted than for valve-spared patients (27.6+/-1.7 mm vs 25.2+/-1.5 mm, p<0.02). In group 2, implanted aortic ring significantly reduced annulus diameter (20.6+/-1.8 mm) without significant aortic valve gradient (8.3+/-3 mmHg). Follow-up was 17.2+/-13.4 months (group 1) and 10.41+/-7.95 months (group 2). Reoperation for recurrent aortic regurgitation was 13% in group 1 (n=3) versus 4.2% in group 2 (n=2). Echocardiographic follow-up found residual aortic regurgitation < or =grade I in 17 patients in group 1 (90%) versus 43 patients in group 2 (95.5%) and of grade II in two patients in group 1 (10%) and two patients in group 2 (4.5%). CONCLUSION: The addition of external aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty improves the remodeling technique's operative reproducibility and short-term results. Therefore, its use as a systematical adjunct to the remodeling procedure is suggested. However, further long-term evaluation comparing this valve-sparing procedure to composite graft replacement should define the best surgical strategy for aortic root aneurysm.     

Aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: Comparison of aortic valve-sparing reimplantation versus composite grafting

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the results of aortic valve-sparing reimplantation and aortic root replacement with mechanical valve conduits in patients with Marfan syndrome undergoing operation for aortic root aneurysms.Patients and methods Between March 1979 and April 2002, 119 patients with clinical evidence of Marfan syndrome underwent composite graft replacement with mechanical valve conduits (n = 74) or aortic valve-sparing reimplantation according to David (n = 45). The underlying causes were aortic dissection type A (43 patients) and aneurysms (76 patients). RESULTS: Patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation were younger compared with patients undergoing composite grafting (28 vs 35 years, P =.002) and had longer intraoperative aortic crossclamp times (125 vs 78 minutes, P <.0001) and extracorporeal circulation times (162 vs 124 minutes, P <.0001). Early postoperative mortality was 6.8% (n = 5) in patients undergoing composite grafting and 0% in patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation (P =.15). Mean follow-up was 30 months for patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation and 114 months for patients undergoing composite grafting. Freedom from reoperation and death after 5 years postoperatively was 92% and 89% in patients undergoing composite grafting and 84% and 96% in patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation (P =.31; P =.54), respectively. Thromboembolic complications or late postoperative bleeding occurred in 17 patients undergoing composite grafting, and an early postoperative event occurred in 1 patient undergoing aortic valve reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of aortic valve reimplantation and composite grafting of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with mechanical valve conduits are similar with regard to early and mid-term postoperative mortality and to the incidence of late reoperations in patients with Marfan syndrome. The low risk of thromboembolic or bleeding complications favors aortic valve reimplantation in these patients.     

Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve-sparing operations are an alternative to aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysms, or aortic valve replacement and supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta in patients with ascending aorta aneurysms and dilated sinotubular junctions with consequent aortic insufficiency. METHODS: From 1988 to 2001, 230 patients underwent aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysms (151 patients) or ascending aortic aneurysms with aortic insufficiency (79 patients). Two types of aortic valve-sparing operations were performed in patients with aortic root aneurysms: reimplantation of the aortic valve and remodeling of the aortic root. Mean follow-up was 3.8 +/- 2.8 years. RESULTS: Patients with aortic root aneurysms were younger, had less severe aortic insufficiency, less extensive vascular disease, and better left ventricular function than patients with ascending aorta aneurysms. The 8-year survival was 83% +/- 5% for the first group and 36% +/- 14% for the second. The freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 8 years was 99% +/- 1% for the first group and 97% +/- 2% for the second. In patients who had aortic root aneurysms, 3 developed severe aortic insufficiency (AI), and 15 developed moderate AI, for an 8-year freedom from significant AI of 67% +/- 7%. But freedom from AI was 90% +/- 3% after the technique of reimplantation, and 55% +/- 6% after the technique of remodeling (p = 0.02). In patients with ascending aortic aneurysms, the freedom from AI greater than 2+ at 8 years was 67% +/- 11%. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of aortic valve sparing for aortic root aneurysms are excellent, and reimplantation of the aortic valve may provide a more stable repair of the aortic valve than remodeling of the aortic root.     

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (remodeling/reimplantation) in acute type A dissection

BACKGROUND: High reoperation rates after supracommissural tube graft replacement for acute type A dissection due to sinus of Valsalva dilation have been reported. Valve-sparing operations focusing on the replacement of the sinus of Valsalva are an appealing alternative. The applicability of these techniques in acute type A dissection remains debatable and results are limited. METHODS: From 1992 to 1998, 20 patients with acute type A dissection received a valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Two different types of aortic valve-sparing operations were performed: the remodeling technique in 11 patients and the reimplantation technique in 9 patients. Patients were followed for 26 +/- 18 months. Echocardiographic studies were performed every 6 months. RESULTS: There were 2 early postoperative deaths and no late death, no reoperation, and no thromboembolic events. The latest echocardiographic studies of the 18 survivors showed a competent valve in 12 and a trivial aortic valve insufficiency in 6 patients. The mean aortic valve pressure gradient was 4.3 +/- 1.3 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: These midterm results support the surgical strategy of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with acute type A dissection.     

One-year appraisal of a new aortic root conduit with sinuses of Valsalva.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the clinical results 1 year after an anatomic reconstruction of the aortic root in which we used a specifically designed aortic root prosthesis that incorporates the sinuses of Valsalva. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The new aortic Dacron prosthesis has a proximal portion in the Dacron conduit that expands on implantation, creating pseudosinuses. During a 12-month period, 28 patients (mean age 59 +/- 14 years) underwent a Bentall operation (12 cases), a remodeling procedure (7 cases), and a reimplantation procedure (9 cases) with the use of a new aortic root conduit. All patients had aortic root aneurysm with an anatomically normal (for the valve-sparing procedure) or diseased aortic valve (for the Bentall operation). Five patients had aortic dissection and 5 had Marfan disease. The mean follow-up was 6 +/- 3 months. All patients underwent postoperative transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiographic studies. RESULTS: All patients survived and were in good clinical condition at the latest follow-up. Postoperative echocardiography showed a marked reduction in ventricular volumes in all patient groups (P <.0005). In the Bentall group the new prosthesis appeared to reduce the tension on the coronary ostial sutures. In patients undergoing both types of valve-sparing procedures a similar normal anatomy of the aortic root was reconstructed. In the reimplantation group the anulus was smaller than in the remodeling group (P =.01). Patients undergoing the reimplantation procedure had less bleeding and a lower incidence of residual valve insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The new aortic root prosthesis allowed the reconstruction of the aortic root anatomy in all types of surgical techniques with low postoperative morbidity.     

Simple modification of "T. David-V" valve-sparing aortic root replacement to create graft pseudosinuses

The absence of sinuses of Valsalva is postulated to perturb coronary flow patterns and to create abnormal leaflet stresses, which theoretically may limit the long-term durability of valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the original Tirone David-I reimplantation technique with a cylindrical tube graft. David developed the “T. David-V” procedure in 2001; it creates large billowing Dacron pseudosinuses while retaining the reimplantation concept. To illustrate a simple modification of the T. David-V technique, we describe a patient with Marfan's syndrome who underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement with 1 large and 1 small graft to create pseudosinuses in the Dacron graft, to facilitate suturing the valve inside the graft, and to make the distal graft-to-aorta anastomosis a better size match.     

New vascular graft for simplification of the aortic valve reimplantation technique

Achievement of optimal valve geometry in valve-sparing aortic root repairs is a prerequisite for favorable valve function and, therefore, the simplification of these procedures is of utmost importance. The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of the new vascular graft for aortic valve reimplantation technique and evaluate the early and intermediate functional results. Five patients with different aortic root and valve pathologies (1 acute aortic dissection, 4 chronic aneurysms, and 1 bicuspid valve) of whom two patients suffered from severe (4+) aortic regurgitation, underwent valve-sparing aortic root repair using the reimplantation technique with the new graft. Three patients required, in addition to the aortic root repair, other procedures on the valve cusps. In all patients, optimal root restoration with no or slight valve insufficiency could be achieved, and these results remained unchanged over the follow-up time of up to two years. The new aortic root graft simplifies aortic root repair using the valve reimplantation technique, and despite its straight form, allows easy restoration of the aortic root, which fits perfectly with patients' anatomy.     

Successful valve-sparing in aortic root reconstruction under endoscopic guidance.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic insufficiency (AI) associated with ascending aneurysm can be corrected by valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction ('David' reimplantation, 'Yacoub' remodeling). Intraoperative endoscopic evaluation in the aortic root may help to clarify the procedure and to access competence of the preserved valve. METHODS: Following cross-clamping of the ascending aorta, an endoscopy was inserted into the proximal aortic root. Perfusion of crystalloid cardioplegia enabled the visualization of the pressure-loaded valve in the closed position. Conventional macroscopic evaluation would have overlooked valve prolapse because of a release from perfusion pressure. Valve coaptation was imaged directly before and after the valve-sparing procedure. A total of 17 patients underwent aortic root reconstruction under endoscopic guidance. Indications of the valve-sparing were determined with endoscopic findings. The degree of AI before and after the surgery was evaluated by aortography and scored (0, none; 1 trivial; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, severe). RESULTS: Remodeling was employed to eight patients and reimplantation to four. The other five patients were replaced with prosthetic valved-conduit. There was no early and late mortality. Before and after the valve-sparing surgery, grades of AI were significantly reduced. Three patients who underwent reimplantation procedure required late valve replacement for late progression of AI, however, none of the patients with remodeling required reoperation. CONCLUSION: Introduction of an endoscopy successfully reduced postoperative AI and clarified indications and limitations of valve-sparing aortic root operations.     

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement and aortic valve repair for a 2-year-old girl with Loeys–Dietz syndrome

We report the case of a 2-year-old girl with Loeys–Dietz syndrome complicated by aortic root dilatation and aortic regurgitation. We performed valve-sparing aortic root replacement with reimplantation technique and aortic valve repair using central plication and free-margin reinforcement simultaneously. The postoperative course was uneventful and the latest echocardiography, 5 years after procedure, revealed trivial aortic insufficiency.     

Aortic valve-sparing operation and a total arch replacement by an elephant trunk method for Marfan's syndrome with aortic regurgitation and a DeBakey type IIIb dissection.

A 35 year-old male with Marfan's syndrome was referred with a fortuitous echographic finding of an abdominal aorta flap. Transthoracic echocardiography showed moderate aortic regurgitation and an aneurysm in the sinus of Valsalva. Computed tomography demonstrated an aneurysm in the sinus of Valsalva 60 mm in size and a DeBakey type IIIb dissection extending from the left subclavian artery to the right common iliac artery. An aortic valve-sparing operation (reimplantation), total aortic arch replacement and the elephant trunk method were used in this patient. An aortic valve-sparing operation is preferable because the patient is young, and has no need for anticoagulant therapy after surgery. The extent of the aortic reconstruction, including the intact aortic arch, was appropriate to prohibit future dilatation of the aortic arch and retrograde dissection from a DeBakey type IIIb dissection.     

Marfan's syndrome with annulo-aortic ectasia and ruptured mitral chorda--a case report of combined composite valve graft replacement of the aortic root and mitral valve replacement]

We report a case of Marfan's syndrome with acute heart failure caused by a ruptured mitral chorda that was successfully treated by one operation of combined composite valve graft replacement of aortic root and mitral valve replacement (MVR). A 23-year-old man was admitted to our hospital presenting severe dyspnea and chest pain. Echocardiography and cardiac catheterization studies demonstrated marked annulo-aortic ectasia, aortic regurgitation and significant mitral regurgitation due to a ruptured chorda. In operation, it was found that a chorda of the mitral posterior leaflet had been torn, with the leaflet completely prolapsed to the left atrium, and that the aortic root was dilated to 90 mm in diameter. The ascending aorta was extensively resected leaving those areas of aortic tissue involving the coronary ostia. Then the mobilized coronary arteries were reattached to the composite graft. MVR was performed with preservation of the whole anterior and posterior mitral valve apparatus except for that small part with the torn chorda. Histopathological findings of the aortic wall and mitral valve were compatible with those of Marfan's syndrome.     

Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after reimplantation procedure

Postoperative left ventricular pseudoaneurysm is a rare, but potentially lethal, complication because of the high risk of rupture and high mortality of repair. We report a 64-year-old man with Marfan syndrome who underwent the reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement complicated by a postoperative left ventricular pseudoaneurysm that required urgent repair. Careful handling of the aortic root is required to avoid a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm, particularly in patients with connective tissue disorder.     

保留主动脉瓣的根部重建术治疗马方综合征主动脉根部瘤

目的 总结保留主动脉瓣的根部重建术治疗马方综合征主动脉根部瘤的经验.方法 2003年7月至2007年12月22例马方综合征患者接受保留主动脉瓣的根部重建术.其中男性12例,女性10例;年龄10～57岁;平均(28±10)岁.手术方法包括再植技术9例、成形技术8例、单片法2例,再植手术+全主动脉置换1例,成形手术+全弓置换+支架象鼻手术1例,单片法+全弓置换+支架象鼻手术1例.术后随访17～64个月,平均随访(46±16)个月.结果 无住院及随访期死亡,1例患者再次开胸止血,随访期无瓣膜相关并发症发生.截至最后一次随访,16例无主动脉瓣反流,4例少量反流,中度及重度反流各1例.中度及重度反流的患者于术后1年进行了再次瓣膜置换手术.结论 保留主动脉瓣的根部重建术早、中期效果满意,可用于治疗马方综合征患者的主动脉根部瘤.     

Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with the Marfan syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of two operations, aortic valve-sparing and aortic root replacement, in patients with aortic root aneurysm and the Marfan syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective review of 78 consecutive patients with aortic root aneurysm and the Marfan syndrome according to the Gent criteria indicated that 42 patients with normal aortic cusps had an aortic valve-sparing operation, and 36 patients had aortic root replacement (mechanical valve in 25 patients and biological valve in 11). The mean age was similar in both groups, but patients who had aortic root replacement had larger aneurysms, higher grade aortic insufficiency, worse left ventricular function and more cardiac co-morbidity than patients who had aortic valve-sparing operations. The mean follow-up was 41+/-35 months for patients who had aortic valve-sparing, and 65+/-50 months for those who had aortic root replacement. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meyer estimates of survival at 5 years was 100% for patients who had aortic valve-sparing, and 88+/-6% for those who had aortic root replacement (P=0.04). Five patients who had aortic root replacement required seven aortic root re-replacements: three for endocarditis and four for valve failure (biological valves). There have been no reoperations in patients who had aortic valve-sparing operations and annual Doppler echocardiography revealed mild or no aortic insufficiency in 39 patients and moderate aortic insufficiency in three. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that aortic valve-sparing operations are safe in patients with the Marfan syndrome and may provide better clinical outcomes than aortic root replacement. Since the size of the aneurysm often determines the feasibility of a valve-sparing procedure, we now recommend surgery when the diameter of the aortic root reaches 50 mm in patients with the Marfan syndrome who have echocardiographically normal aortic valve cusps.     

Valve-sparing root replacement after the Ross procedure

ObjectivesThe Ross procedure is a preferred treatment for infants and children with aortic valve disease. Progressive neoaortic root dilation and neoaortic insufficiency can occur after the Ross procedure, and because of the young age of these patients, valve-sparing aortic root replacement procedures have advantages compared with the Bentall procedure. The aim of this study is to describe our experience with different techniques of aortic valve-sparing root replacement in this unique cohort of patients.MethodsPatients undergoing valve-sparing aortic root replacement with a history of the Ross procedure between January 2001 and March 2021 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed, and clinical characteristics of these patients were analyzed. The results of different types of valve-sparing aortic root replacement were also compared.ResultsForty-two patients who had previously undergone a Ross procedure in childhood presented for reintervention for neoaortic root or valve pathology. Seventeen of these patients were considered for valve-sparing aortic root replacement but underwent bioprosthetic or mechanical valve replacement, and 25 patients underwent successful valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Patients who underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement received a traditional aortic root remodeling procedure with or without suture annuloplasty (Yacoub technique, group 1, n = 7), an aortic root reimplantation procedure (David technique, group 2, n = 11), or a modified root remodeling procedure that also used a geometric annuloplasty ring (group 3, n = 7). Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. Mean follow-up for these 3 cohorts was 14 years, 4 years, and 1 year, respectively. Overall survival was good, with 1 early death due to hemorrhage in group 2 and 1 death due to malignancy in group 1. Eight patients (7 in group 1; 1 in group 2) required subsequent aortic valve replacements due to neoaortic insufficiency, whereas none in group 3 have required any reintervention. Overall, patients requiring valve replacement after valve-sparing aortic root replacement had lower grades of preoperative neoaortic insufficiency and higher grades of postoperative neoaortic insufficiency. Greater than mild postoperative neoaortic insufficiency was associated with the need for subsequent neoaortic valve replacement.ConclusionsValve-sparing aortic root replacement is safe in patients with a prior Ross procedure. Reimplantation offers superior durability compared with the traditional remodeling procedure. Greater than mild neoaortic insufficiency on postoperative echocardiogram should prompt additional attempts at valve repair. A modified remodeling procedure with geometric ring annuloplasty that is personalized to the patient's individual anatomy is safe with good short-term results, but longer follow-up is needed.     

Aortic valve reimplantation in ascending aortic aneurysm: risk factors for early valve failure

BACKGROUND: Aortic root reconstruction by reimplantation of the native valve represents a new therapeutic option for ascending aortic aneurysms. Information about long-term follow-up is limited, and possible predictors for failure of reconstruction have not been evaluated so far. METHODS: After aortic valve reimplantation 101 patients were followed in a prospective observational study. From this cohort the first 75 consecutive patients with a complete 1-year follow-up were chosen for further analysis. Clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained preoperatively, intraoperatively, and early postoperatively, as well as after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: No mortality was observed within the first 30 days. There were 52 male patients, mean age was 49.1+/-20.6 years, observation period was 35.6+/-20.6 months, and Marfan's syndrome was present in 22 patients. Although in 67 patients a stable valve function could be demonstrated, 5 patients presented with mild aortic insufficiency or had to be operated on again for secondary valve failure (n = 3). Analyzing possible demographic, disease-related, and procedure-related risk factors in a multivariable approach, only level of coaptation within the graft (as assessed by echocardiography) could be identified as being related to the subsequent development of aortic insufficiency. Coaptation level within the tube graft (type A) resulted in a mean aortic regurgitation grade of 0.3+/-0.5 as compared with a mean grade of 2.5+/-0.6 for a coaptation type C (below the prosthesis; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve reimplantation is a promising alternative to alloprosthetic composite replacement. A level of coaptation within the tube graft is essential to achieve valve competence.     

Valve-preserving surgery of the proximal aorta.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of proximal aortic disease currently offers a variety of surgical options. Traditionally, replacement of the proximal aorta has been performed with a composite graft in most cases; supracommissural aortic replacement was the only alternative if preservation of the native aortic valve was attempted. Valve-preserving root operations currently allow us to avoid the disadvantages of prosthetic heart valves and completely eliminate aortic root pathology. METHODS: Between 10/95 and 5/99, 219 patients were treated for proximal aortic disease. The diagnoses included degenerative disease (n=158), acute dissection (n=48), and chronic dissection (n=13). Composite replacement of valve and root (n=99) was used only in patients with significant degeneration or stenosis of the aortic valve. For near-normal root dimensions supracommissural aortic replacement (n=44) was chosen. Root remodeling (n=60) and reimplantation of the valve within a vascular graft (n=16) were performed for aortic valve regurgitation and root dilatation. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 5.7%; in elective operations, mortality was expectedly lower compared to emergency interventions (2.4% vs 16.3%; p<0.05). Hospital mortality for valve preserving procedures was similar (elective procedures 1.9%, emergency operations 9.5%). Two-year freedom from aortic regurgitation grade II or higher was 89% for remodeling and 92% for reimplantation. Freedom from reoperation for secondary and increasing regurgitation at two years was 96% for remodeling and 100% after reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Using current techniques of valve preserving surgery, combined disease of the aortic valve, root, and extended segments of the aorta can be corrected without the disadvantages of prosthetic heart valves in the majority of patients. Further experience will define the relative role of the different operative modifications.     

Surgery of the ascending aorta: five years'' experience at a regional cardiac centre.

Between 1972 and 1978, 31 patients underwent replacement of the ascending aorta, with or without aortic valve surgery, at the Wessex Regional Cardiac Centre. The commonest indications for operation were aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta causing aortic regurgitation and acute dissection of the ascending aorta. Eleven of the 31 patients had features of Marfan's syndrome. The overall hospital mortality was 19.4%, a figure comparable with those reported in other series; ventricular failure secondary to ischaemia during operation was the commonest cause of death. The long-term symptomatic results were excellent, except in the two patients who underwent resuspension of the aortic valve for aortic regurgiation associated with acute dissections. For aneurysms of the ascending aorta with associated aortic regurgitation, replacement of the valve and ascending aorta with a combined valve prosthesis and synthetic tube graft, with reimplantation of the coronary ostia, is the procedure of choice if the aortic valve ring is diseased. Experience to date indicates that replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve with separate prostheses, leaving the coronary ostia undisturbed, is a satisfactory alternative provided the aortic annulus is of suitable size and quality; this is more likely to be the case in dissections than in aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta. Replacement of the ascending aorta may also be indicated in some cases of dilatation of the ascending aorta secondary to aortic valve disease if the aortic wall is unusually thin.