Combination therapy with peginterferon alpha-2B and ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection: preliminary results of an open prospective study

Allograft reinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in transplant recipients occurs commonly and represents a major concern in the transplant setting. Suppression of viral replication in HCV transplant patients should prevent or delay progression to cirrhosis and graft failure. In this ongoing study, we present preliminary data from a prospective trial of standard interferon (IFN) alpha-2b (2 million units daily) for 3 months and subsequent peginterferon (PEG IFN) alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week) for 9 months. IFN therapy was combined with ribavirin (10 to 12 mg/kg). So far, HCV has become undetectable by qualitative PCR in 33% of patients while 25% had a reduction of HCV RNA to undetectable by the bDNA assay and 42% had no virological response after 6 months of therapy. A biochemical response was detected in 42% of patients. Improvement of inflammatory activity was observed in 42% of patients after 6 months. In three patients anemia necessitated administration of erythropoietin and three patients received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) due to leucopenia [corrected] In conclusion, we observed that daily IFN alpha-2b and subsequent PEG IFN alpha-2b therapy in combination with ribavirin provides biochemical and virological benefits in transplant recipients with established recurrent HCV infection.     

Pilot study of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C is often treated with an interferon and ribavirin combination therapy, but the results have been disappointing. Given the promising results reported with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C, we were interested in evaluating the effectiveness of this treatment in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C (HCV). METHODS: Between November 2001 and September 2002, patients with recurrent HCV were screened to determine if they were eligible for treatment. Liver function tests, HCV-RNA, and liver biopsies were performed on all patients prior to treatment. HCV-RNA was repeated at 3 months, the end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months after EOT for patients who were HCV-RNA negative at EOT. Patients were prospectively followed after starting weekly pegylated interferon alfa-2b 1.5 mcg/kg per week and ribavirin 800 mg per day (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) with folic acid 1 mg per day. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients eligible for treatment displayed a median age of 50.4 years. Eighteen patients completed treatment, 4 remain on treatment, and 17 were intolerant. Sustained HCV-RNA eradication occurred in 66.7% of patients who completed treatment. Side effects led to treatment withdrawal in 17 patients (43.6%) In an intention-to treat analysis, sustained HCV-RNA eradication occurred in 30.8% of patients. CONCLUSION: Side effects are an important limiting factor in the treatment of recurrent HCV with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. However, these results are encouraging as sustained HCV eradication occurred in at least 66.7% of patients who completed treatment. Prospective randomized trials are required to assess the effectiveness of this treatment and its impact on quality of life and histology.     

Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is often treated with interferon and ribavirin combination therapy but results have been disappointing. Given the promising results reported with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C, this combination is now preferred for the treatment of recurrent HCV. This article reports a transplantation program's experience with antiviral therapy treatment for liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV. METHODS: Between October 2002 and June 2004, patients with recurrent HCV were screened to determine if they were eligible for treatment. Liver function tests, HCVRNA, and liver biopsies were done on all patients prior to treatment. HCVRNA was repeated at 3 months, end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months after EOT for patients HCVRNA-negative at EOT. Patients were prospectively followed up after starting weekly pegylated interferon alfa-2a 180 mcg/wk and ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/d (Roche, Nutley, NJ, United States) with folic acid 1 mg/d. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were eligible for treatment with a median age of 49.2 years. Twenty-one patients have completed treatment, 6 remain on treatment, and 5 were intolerant. In an intention-to-treat analysis, sustained HCVRNA eradication occurred in at least 40.6% of patients. Side effects led to treatment withdrawal in 5 patients (15.6%). CONCLUSION: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin appear promising for the treatment of recurrent HCV. Side effects were an infrequent cause of treatment discontinuation, unlike previous combinations of interferon-based therapy. Randomized, prospective trials incorporating serial liver biopsies with appropriate quality of life analyses are required to manage this silent epidemic.     

Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir‐Based Antiviral Therapy to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Kidney Transplantation

There is no approved therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after kidney transplantation, and no data regarding the use of new‐generation direct antiviral agents (DAAs) have been published so far. The aims of this pilot study were to assess the efficacy and safety of an interferon‐free sofosbuvir‐based regimen to treat chronic HCV infection in kidney transplant recipients. Twenty‐five kidney transplant recipients with chronic HCV infection were given, for 12 (n = 19) or 24 weeks (n = 6), sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (n = 3); sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir (n = 4); sofosbuvir plus simeprevir, with (n = 1) or without ribavirin (n = 6); sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, with (n = 1) or without ribavirin (n = 9); and sofosbuvir plus pegylated‐interferon plus ribavirin (n = 1). A rapid virological response, defined by undetectable viremia at week 4 after starting DAA therapy, was observed in 22 of the 25 patients (88%). At the end of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in all patients. At 4 and 12 weeks after completing DAA therapy, all had a sustained virological response. The tolerance to anti‐HCV therapy was excellent and no adverse event was observed. A significant decrease in calcineurin inhibitor levels was observed after HCV clearance. New‐generation oral DAAs are efficient and safe to treat HCV infection after kidney transplantation.     

Response to antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C viral infection: a single center experience

Jain A, Sharma R, Ryan C, Safadjou S, Kashyap R, Mantry P, Maliakkal B, Orloff M. Response to antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C viral infection: a single center experience.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 104–111. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.   Abstract: 
Introduction:  Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hepatic allograft is a major concern after successful liver transplant (LTx).
Aim:  To examine the response rate to pegylated interferon (PEG–IFN) and ribavirin in post-LTx patients with HCV recurrence.
Patients and methods:  Between January 2003 and September 2006, 60 patients with biopsy proven HCV recurrence (46 males and 14 females) received PEG–IFN 2a (n = 40) or IFN 2b (n = 20) with ribavirin. All patients were followed until July 2007.
Results:  Fourteen patients (23.3%) tolerated antiviral therapy for less than six months and 10 (16.7%) discontinued therapy between six and 11 months. PEG–IFN dose was reduced in 21 (35%) patients and ribavirin dose was reduced in 16 (26.7%) patients. Overall, 55% patients achieved end of treatment response (EOT) and 35% sustained virological response (SVR). Mean Hepatitis Activity Index and Fibrosis Score pre-therapy was 5.8 ± 1.9 and 1.7 ± 1.3 and post-therapy, it was 4.4 ± 2.1 and 2.4 ± 1.6, respectively. Overall, three yr patient and graft survival was 73.9% and 69.2%, respectively. The patients with SVR had significantly lower viral load compared with other groups (p = 0.028).
Conclusion:  PEG–IFN and ribavirin therapy achieved 55% EOT and 35% SVR; 60% patients tolerated therapy. Biochemical response was observed in all groups of patients irrespective of virological response.     

Treatment of posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis C with interferon and ribavirin: Lessons on tolerability and efficacy

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation is a major cause of graft failure. The aim of our study was to determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin in the treatment of recurrent hepatitis after liver transplantation. Twenty-six patients (18 men) with histologically established HCV recurrence after liver transplantation for cirrhosis secondary to chronic HCV infection were treated with a combination of interferon alfa-2b (3 million units three times weekly) and ribavirin (800 to 1,000 mg/d). Dosage modifications were according to a standard protocol incorporating laboratory values and clinical side effects. Fifty percent of patients completed 1 year or more of therapy. On an intention-to-treat basis, nine patients (35%) showed an end-of-treatment virological response. Six of these nine patients completed greater than 6 additional months of follow-up, and all have had sustained virological responses. A histological response (decrease in histological activity index ≥ 2) was seen in 75% of virological responders and 67% of nonresponders. Adverse events requiring dose modification or cessation of therapy occurred in 66% of patients. Adjuvant therapies used to support hemoglobin levels included erythropoietin and red blood cell transfusions. There were no independent pretreatment predictors of a virological response, perhaps because of the small sample size. Combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin may be beneficial in patients with recurrent HCV after liver transplantation. The majority of patients require dose modifications because of side effects. Histological response is common in virological nonresponders. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:623-629.)     

Applicability, Tolerability and Efficacy of Preemptive Antiviral Therapy in Hepatitis C-Infected Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Preliminary studies suggest preemptive anti-HCV therapy in liver transplant recipients may enhance the rates of viral clearance, but the applicability and tolerability of preemptive therapy has not been evaluated in a contemporary cohort. In this randomized study, the safety and tolerability of preemptive standard (IFN) or pegylated (peg-IFN) interferon alfa-2b (3 MU thrice weekly or 1.5 microg/kg weekly), or IFN/peg-IFN plus ribavirin (600 mg increased to 1.0-1.2 g daily) was initiated 2-6 weeks post-transplantation and continued for a total of 48 weeks. Only 51 (41%) of 124 transplant recipients were eligible for preemptive treatment; eligible patients had lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Childs-Pugh scores pre-transplantation and were more frequently live donor transplant recipients than ineligible patients. Dose reductions and discontinuations were required in 85% and 37% of patients, respectively, and 27% experienced serious adverse events. Growth factor (GF) use (erythropoietin and GCSF) in the latter half of the study did not significantly affect the frequency of dose reductions. Only 15% of patients were able to achieve full-dose treatment during treatment. End-of-treatment and sustained virological responses were 13.6% and 9.1%, respectively, with most responders in the combination therapy group. We conclude that preemptive antiviral therapy is applicable to only a portion of transplant recipients, with 'sicker' patients less likely to be managed by this approach. Living donor liver transplant recipients were more frequently eligible for treatment than deceased donor recipients. Virological response rates are low, likely related to the poor tolerability of therapy and the lack of achievement of target drug doses. Future studies should focus on alternative dosing schedules with more aggressive use of adjuvant therapies, including GFs.     

Histological Benefit of Retreatment by Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b and Ribavirin in Patients with Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus Infection Posttransplantation

We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of pegylated interferon/ribavirin in patients who did not respond to previous posttransplant recurrent HCV treatment with IFN/ribavirin combination. Twenty-seven patients were consecutively included in this study and retreated with pegylated interferon alfa-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week) with ribavirin (800-1000 mg daily) for 48 weeks for genotype 1 and 4 and 24 weeks for other genotypes. We compared them with 21 untreated patients enrolled during the same period. Primary endpoint was the SVR and secondary endpoint was histological evaluation 24 weeks after ending therapy. Twenty-seven patients started therapy but 2 (7%) stopped because of side effects. On an intent-to-treat basis, eight patients (30%) had an SVR. Cyclosporine as immunosuppressive therapy during antiviral therapy (p = 0.03) and EVR (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with viral clearance. In 46 patients in whom paired graft biopsies were available, fibrosis score was improved in 76% of treated patients versus 5% in untreated patients. Among treated patients, improvement of fibrosis was not correlated to SVR. Our data show that 30% of patients who have failed prior posttransplantation treatment achieved an SVR when retreated with pegylated interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin. More interesting is that fibrosis score was improved in 65% of treated patients despite failure of HCV eradication.     

Fibrosis progression in hepatitis C positive liver recipients after sustained virologic response to antiviral combination therapy (interferon-ribavirin therapy)

The rate of fibrosis progression was analyzed in 28 hepatitis C virus-infected liver graft recipients showing sustained virologic response after treatment with ribavirin plus either standard interferon alpha-2b (n=8), pegylated interferon alpha-2b (n=8), or pegylated interferon alpha-2a (n=12). Protocol biopsies before treatment as well as one, three, and five years after treatment showed no significant increase in mean fibrosis scores within the first three years after treatment (mean score at baseline 1.8 and at one and three years 2.0 and 2.1, respectively). Five years after cessation of treatment, the mean fibrosis score declined to 1.4 (P=0.2). Six of 28 patients (21%) showed an increase in fibrosis, five (18%) a decrease, and 17 (60%) no changes. The yearly fibrosis progression rate was 0.75 before treatment and 0.15 after antiviral treatment. Sustained virologic response is associated with a deceleration of fibrosis progression and might therefore play a major role in prevention of graft cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus-infected liver graft recipients.     

Outcomes of acute rejection after interferon therapy in liver transplant recipients.

Interferon alfa has been increasingly used against recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) disease in post-liver transplant (LT) recipients. A serious potential adverse effect is acute rejection. We reviewed our experience using interferon-based therapy (interferon or pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin) for treating recurrent HCV in LT recipients. Forty-four LT recipients were treated with interferon for recurrent HCV. Five of the 44 patients developed acute rejection during interferon-based therapy. These 5 patients started treatment of 42.4 +/- 33.89 months (mean +/- SD) after LT. Mean (+/- SD) histological activity index and fibrosis scores before initiating antiviral therapy were 8.8 (+/- 1.92) and 2.6 (+/- 0.55), respectively. Patients were treated for 3.3 +/- 2.28 months (mean +/- SD) prior to rejection. At the time of rejection, HCV load was not detectable in 4 of the 5 recipients. All 5 patients had tolerated interferon therapy, and none had stopped therapy because of adverse effects. The rejection was successfully treated in 3 patients. In 2 of those 3 patients, cirrhosis eventually developed. In the 2 patients who did not respond to rejection treatment, immediate graft failure occurred, leading to re-LT in 1 patient and death from sepsis in the other. In conclusion, the results indicate that further studies are needed to assess the safety of interferon in LT recipients. Interferon-based therapy may lead to acute rejection and subsequent graft loss and should therefore be used with caution. Treated recipients may also develop progressive cirrhosis despite achieving a sustained virological response.     

Impact of double-filtration plasmapheresis in combination with interferon and ribavirin in living donor liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C

Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) selectively removes high molecular weight substances including hepatitis C virus (HCV). Four live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients with HCV received combination therapy with low-dose interferon (IFN) and ribavirin with DFPP. Three patients underwent this therapy for prophylaxis of HCV recurrence, and one for treating fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH). The combination therapy and DFPP decreased HCV RNA levels to 8.2% +/- 2.9% and 0.7% +/- 0.5% by the 5th and 30th day of treatment, respectively. Three patients who underwent DFPP for prophylaxis showed no evidence of HCV recurrence for >1 year after treatment. The patient whose graft showed FCH, recovered dramatically after the DFPP treatment. DFPP appeared to be effective in reducing HCV viremia and preventing HCV recurrence in patients with high HCV RNA levels after LDLT. Moreover, it may become a rescue therapy for FCH in a liver transplant recipient with hepatitis C.     

Effects of interferon treatment on liver histology and allograft rejection in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation.

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation remains a significant cause of graft loss and retransplantation. Although treatment of recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based regimens has become widely accepted as safe and can lead to sustained virologic clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, long-term histologic improvement and the risk of precipitating graft rejection remain controversial. The present study is a retrospective evaluation of the clinical and histological consequences of treating recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based therapy in a selected group of liver transplant recipients. Twenty-three liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C and histologic evidence of progressive fibrosis completed at least 6 months of interferon, 83% of whom received pegylated-interferon alpha-2b; only 4 tolerated ribavirin. Overall, 11 patients (48%) had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of 6 months of treatment. Of these patients, 3 remained HCV RNA-negative on maintenance interferon monotherapy for 33 months, and the other 8 (35%) completed treatment and remained HCV RNA-undetectable 24 weeks after discontinuation of interferon. Overall necroinflammatory activity in liver biopsies obtained 2 years after HCV RNA became undetectable decreased significantly (7.73 +/- 2.37 vs. 5.64 +/- 2.94 units before and after treatment, respectively; P =.016). However, 5 of these 11 patients had no histologic improvement in follow-up liver histology. Liver biopsies in the 12 nonresponders demonstrated disease progression. Of the 23 patients treated with interferon, 8 (35%) had evidence of acute or chronic rejection on posttreatment liver biopsy, most of whom had no previous history of rejection (P <.01 for comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment prevalence of histologic rejection), and 2 experienced graft loss from chronic rejection, requiring retransplantation. In conclusion, interferon treatment of recurrent hepatitis C does not consistently improve histologic disease after virologic response, and it may increase the risk of allograft rejection.     

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: A nonrandomized trial of interferon alfa alone versus interferon alfa and ribavirin

Liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection often have histological hepatitis, and in some patients, graft failure develops. The aim of this nonrandomized study is to determine the efficacy and tolerability of interferon alfa (IFN alfa) alone and IFN alfa and ribavirin combination therapy in such patients. Forty transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis were initiated on therapy with IFN alfa-2b at 3 million units (MU) three times weekly for 1 month followed by 5 MU three times weekly for 5 months. Twenty patients were administered IFN alfa-2b, 3 MU three times weekly for 1 month followed by 5 MU three times weekly for 11 months, and ribavirin, 600 mg, twice daily orally for 12 months concurrently. The primary end point was sustained clearance of serum HCV RNA, and secondary end points were serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level normalization and histological improvement. Thirty patients completed 6 months of IFN-alfa monotherapy and 15 patients completed 12 months of IFN alfa and ribavirin combination therapy. End-of-treatment biochemical responses were similar in the two groups (IFN alfa, 20% v combination therapy, 25%); however, viral clearance was greater in the combination-therapy group (40% v 15%; P = .04). Six months after the completion of therapy, only 1 patient (2.5%) in the IFN-alfa group and 4 patients (20%) in the combination-therapy group were HCV RNA negative (P = .03). Serum ALT and HCV RNA levels declined significantly in both groups during therapy. There was no improvement in inflammatory grade, and fibrosis score was worse in both groups. Ten patients (25%) in the IFN-alfa group and 5 patients (20%) in the combination-therapy group withdrew because of adverse effects. We conclude that in liver allograft recipients with recurrent hepatitis C, combination therapy with IFN alfa and ribavirin is more efficacious than treatment with IFN alfa alone. However, the efficacy is limited by tolerability. (Liver Transpl 2001;7:863-869.)     

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the treatment of post-liver transplant recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND: Histological recurrence of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurs in the majority of persons transplanted for cirrhosis as a result of HCV. Herein we analyze our experience with the use of both conventional and pegylated (PEG) interferon (IFN) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV. Methods: Patients transplanted between 1992 and 2001 with post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) histological recurrence of HCV, and who were treated with at least 6 months of IFN or PEG-IFN in combination with RBV were included in this analysis. A retrospective chart review was performed. Results: A total of 31 patients were included. Fifteen were treated with IFN/RBV and 16 with PEG-IFN/RBV. Of these 16, 11 had been begun on IFN/RBV and were changed to PEG-IFN/RBV because of persistent viremia. Three patients (20%) in the IFN/RBV group and six patients (37.5%) in the PEG-IFN/RBV group experienced a virologic response (VR) on therapy. Of the six patients experiencing VR in the PEG-IFN/RBV group, three (50%) were IFN/RBV non-responders. There were two sustained VRs (SVR). The 65.6% of all patients experienced a biochemical response (BR) on therapy. Seven deaths were observed. Dose modifications of IFN or PEG-IFN (87.1%) and RBV (80.6%) and the requirement for hematopoietic growth factors were frequent. Conclusions: Treatment of recurrent HCV infection with combination of IFN or PEG-IFN and RBV produced an on-therapy VR in 29% and BR in 65% of patients. Hematologic toxicity and dose modifications were frequent. Our experience with antiviral therapy for HCV post-OLT remains disappointing but PEG-IFN + RBV appears to produce VR in a sizable portion of IFN + RBV non-responders.     

Clinical and histological efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant is controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and histological efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha 2b (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). We prospectively included 47 liver transplant patients with: 1) a positive test for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-ribonucleic acid (RNA) in serum; 2) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >45 UI/mL; and 3) a liver biopsy showing chronic hepatitis without rejection in the previous 2 months. Patients received PEG-IFN (1.5 microg/kg/week) and ribavirin (800-1,000 mg/day) for 12 months. Follow-up was based on biochemical (ALT), virological (RNA-HCV), and histological (liver biopsy) examinations. Follow-up lasted a minimum of 6 months after the end of antiviral therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 23% of the patients. A total of 33 (70%) patients had normalized ALT levels at the end of therapy. Inflammatory portal and lobular score declined significantly in patients with SVR (P < 0.05) but not in nonresponder patients. Fibrosis did not change significantly in either group. SVR was significantly associated with low gamma-glutamyltransferase GGT (P = 0.04) and HCV-RNA levels (P = 0.03), a virological response at 12 weeks (P = 0.002) and patient's compliance (P = 0.04). Ten (21%) patients were withdrawn prematurely due to adverse effects. In conclusion, Therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin achieved SVR and a significant histological improvement in 23% of liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Toxicity is an important drawback of this therapy.     

Treating hepatitis C infection in liver transplant recipients.

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a growing problem worldwide, with up to 300 million individuals infected, and those with chronic infection are at risk for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe. Unfortunately, although transplantation is effective for treating decompensated cirrhosis and limited hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis C, HCV reinfection is virtually the rule among transplant recipients. Reinfection of the graft is associated with more rapidly progressive disease, with a median time to cirrhosis of 8 to 10 yr. Unfortunately, treatment of chronic HCV in liver transplant recipients is suboptimal. Combination therapy with interferon (pegylated and nonpegylated forms) plus ribavirin appears to provide maximum benefits. Drug therapy is usually administered for recurrent disease. No prophylactic therapy is available. Preemptive regimens offer no distinctive advantages over treatments begun for recurrent disease. Overall, treatment is poorly tolerated, with frequent need for dose reductions, especially from cytopenias, and drug discontinuations in up to 50% of patients. Optimizing drug doses is important in maximizing sustained virological response rates. Future therapies may include ribavirin alternatives with lower rates of anemia, alternative interferons with lower rates of cytopenias, and new antiviral drugs that can be used alone or in combination with either interferon or ribavirin to enhance sustained virological response rates and improve tolerability. Liver Transpl 12:1192-1204, 2006. (c) 2006 AASLD.     

Sustained virologic response to therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is related to early virologic response and dose adherence.

Sustained virologic response (SVR) after antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients is consistently lower than that achieved in non-LT patients. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in LT recipients with recurrent HCV and factors associated with SVR. All subjects with histologic evidence of recurrent HCV were intended to be treated for 48 weeks with full-dose pegylated IFN; target dose of RBV was 800 mg/day. Thirty-five LT recipients with recurrent HCV, median age 48.5 years, 77% genotype 1, and median pretreatment HCV RNA 6.4 log10 IU/mL were treated between January 2000 and February 2006. Antiviral therapy was discontinued prematurely in 15 subjects as a result of adverse events. Median overall treatment duration was 46 weeks. Early virologic response at week 12 was seen in 17 (49%) and an end-of-treatment virological response in 19 (54%) patients. SVR was achieved in 13 patients (37%), and all 9 patients followed for >1 year after treatment had durable response. Patients with SVR had significantly lower pretreatment HCV RNA (5.7 vs. 6.5 log10 IU/mL, P=0.003), more likely to have a week 12 virological response (85% vs. 27%, P=0.0009) and received higher cumulative doses of pegylated IFN (75% vs. 33%, P=0.029) and RBV (90% vs. 26%, P=0.016) compared with patients whose disease did not respond to therapy. In conclusion, SVR was achieved in 37% of patients with recurrent hepatitis C after LT. Similar to non-LT patients, those with lower pretreatment HCV RNA, a week 12 virological response, and pegylated IFN and RBV dose adherence were more likely to achieve SVR.     

Preemptive therapy with pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin after liver transplantation for hepatitis C cirrhosis

We present our results of preemptive treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin after liver transplantation for hepatitis C cirrhosis. PATIENTS: Between September 2001 and August 2002, four patients were started on combination therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha-2b (1microg/kg weekly) and ribavirin (400-1000 mg/d) 3 to 4 weeks' posttransplant. Treatment was continued for 6 (genotype 3a, 2 patients) or 12 (genotype 1b, 2 patients) months. Virologic and biochemical responses as well as side effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Two patients (genotype 3a) became HCV (hepatitis C virus)-RNA negative after 3 months of therapy and are persistently negative 20 and 14 months after end of therapy. One patient (genotype 1b) became HCV-RNA negative 6 months after start of treatment, but therapy had to be withdrawn after 9 months owing to fatigue and suspicion of angina pectoris. One patient who was later retransplanted because of hepatic artery thrombosis discontinued therapy after 2.5 months owing to anemia, leukopenia, and no signs of HCV-RNA reduction. Interestingly, two of the responders were nonresponders prior to liver transplant. Median ALT levels at start of therapy were 98 U/L (r = 60-126) and 12 months later 40 U/L (r = 24-58) (n = 4). No rejection episode was detected. CONCLUSION: In patients liver-transplanted due to HCV-cirrhosis, combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin can be effective and safe in the early posttransplant period, thus preventing recurrent hepatitis C.     

Successful treatment of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with pegylated interferon,ribavirin and sofosbuvir after a combined kidney–liver transplantation

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a classical but rare and severe form of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation. Classical anti‐HCV therapy, that is pegylated‐interferon (peg‐interferon) and ribavirin, has been shown to have limited efficacy in treating FCH. Herein, we report on the first case of successful use of peg‐interferon, ribavirin, plus sofosbuvir to treat HCV‐induced FCH in a combined liver–kidney transplant patient. Antiviral therapy was given for 24 weeks. HCV clearance occurred within 4 weeks after starting therapy and was maintained until 4 weeks after the end of therapy. Antiviral tolerance was good. We conclude that the use of sofosbuvir‐based anti‐HCV therapy can be successfully used to treat FCH after a liver or combined kidney–liver transplantation.