Topographic- and wavefront-guided customized ablations with the NIDEK-EC5000CXII in LASIK for myopia

PURPOSE: To assess refractive outcomes, changes in the total higher order root mean square (RMS) aberration, and changes in higher order wavefront aberrations after LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism with the NIDEK Advanced Vision Excimer Laser platform (NAVEX) using either an aspheric or topography-based or whole eye wavefront ablation algorithm. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1459 eyes that underwent LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.68 diopters (D) (range: -0.50 to -9.63 D) with astigmatism up to -4.50 D. Treatments were classified into three categories depending on the type of ablation algorithm used--optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) denoted eyes that underwent aspheric treatment zones; customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) denoted eyes that underwent customized ablations based on corneal topography; and OPDCAT denoted eyes that underwent customized ablation based on the whole eye wavefront profile. Follow-up data are reported at 3 months (69%) and 12 months (17%) postoperatively. RESULTS: Three months after LASIK, the predictability (10.5 D from target refraction) was 80% for OATz, 91% for CATz, and 76% for OPDCAT. Of all eyes, 96% were within +/- 1.0 D of intended refraction 3 months postoperatively and 100% after 12 months (87% +/- 0.5 D). In the aspheric and custom groups, a notable improvement of uncorrected visual acuity was noted between 3 and 12 months after LASIK. No eye lost >1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Mean higher order RMS increased in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data support that the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism is safe and effective with NAVEX. Customized ablation based on corneal topography rather than on total wavefront error was more predictable.     

Topography-guided CATz versus conventional LASIK for myopia with the NIDEK EC-5000: A bilateral eye study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the difference in visual acuity, subjective night vision glare, and higher order aberrations in eyes with myopia with or without astigmatism operated with topography-guided customized corneal LASIK and conventional LASIK. METHODS: This contralateral study includes 46 eyes (23 patients) that underwent topography-guided corneal customized LASIK using the customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) ablation profile in one eye and conventional LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 Advanced Vision Excimer laser system (NAVEX) in the other eye for myopia with or without astigmatism. Patients were masked to which eye underwent topography-guided CATz or conventional LASIK. Postoperative glare and root-mean-square (RMS) values for total higher order aberrations were measured at 1 and 3 months and compared between the two eyes. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in uncorrected visual acuity between the two groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Of all patients, 81% stated glare was higher in conventionally treated eyes than in the CATz-treated eyes at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The RMS values for total coma (0.2385 vs 0.1522) and spherical aberration (0.2381 vs 0.1058) in conventionally treated and CATz-treated eyes were significantly higher in conventionally treated eyes (P=.029 and P=.004, respectively) at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided corneal customized LASIK with the CATz profile gave better night vision quality as compared to conventional LASIK with expanded treatment zone. Better night vision quality was associated with less induced spherical aberrations and coma postoperatively in the CATz treatment group.     

Customized LASIK treatment for myopia: relationship between preoperative higher order aberrations and refractive outcome

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of preoperative higher order aberrations on postoperative sphere and cylinder outcome. METHODS: Three hundred thirty myopic eyes (mean: -3.32 +/- 1.54 diopters [D], range: -1.0 to -7.0 D) treated with customized ablation using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb) were followed through 6 months after LASIK. Pre- and postoperative visual acuity, higher order root mean square (RMS), third order RMS, and spherical aberration were compared to study the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The relationship between preoperative higher order aberrations and manifest refraction after LASIK was analyzed. RESULTS: Following LASIK, 91.5% of eyes obtained an uncorrected visual acuity of > or = 20/20 and 70.3% of eyes obtained 20/16 without retreatment; 99% had a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of > or = 20/20 (75.9% of eyes were within +/- 0.50 D). Mean value of significant increase in postoperative higher order aberrations was 0.12 +/- 0.18 microm (P<.0001). Increased spherical aberration was associated with increased myopia treatment (P<.0001). Greater positive spherical aberration after LASIK was significantly correlated to postoperative hyperopia (overcorrection). Change in third order RMS was significantly correlated to change in spherical equivalent refraction among eyes with postoperative astigmatism (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: With the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217z Zyoptix software, treatment of higher order aberrations, especially third order (coma and trefoil) and spherical aberration, significantly improved postoperative refractive status.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for compound myopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating patients with myopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser. METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 42 patients with myopia ranging from -4.50 to -9.88 D and astigmatism ranging from 0.50 to 4.00 D who underwent LASIK with the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser and the Summit Krumeich-Barraquer microkeratome were studied. Patients were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction was -7.12 +/- 1.70 D and cylinder was 1.62 +/- 1.72 D. At 12 months, mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.49 +/- 0.57 D and mean refractive cylinder was 0.59 +/- 0.32 D. Mean change in spherical equivalent refraction between 1 and 12 months after surgery was -0.09 +/- 0.31 D, toward myopia. At baseline, no eyes had best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 or better, and 65% had 20/40 or better. At 12 months after surgery, 10% of eyes had BSCVA of 20/20 or better and 88% of eyes had 20/40 or better. The unusually low postoperative BSCVA results were thought to be due to amblyopia or existence of a higher percentage of some optical aberrations in this group of eyes. Mean uncorrected visual acuity was -1.38 +/- 0.42 LogMAR units (20/400) at baseline and -0.29 +/- 0.25 LogMAR units (20/40) at the 12-month postoperative examination. No eyes lost two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. No vision threatening complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK with the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser appeared to be safe, effective, reasonably predictable, and stable for correction of myopic astigmatism with a spherical component between -4.25 and -8.25 D and a cylindrical component between 0.50 and 4.00 D. However, astigmatism was slightly undercorrected with the algorithm used.     

Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of wavefront-supported customized ablation (WASCA) in eyes treated with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct spherical myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: One-hundred fifty eyes of 104 patients (mean age 33.4 +/- 4.4 years) were included in the study. An Asclepion Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer was used to assess lower and higher order refractive aberrations of eyes, and customized PRK treatments were carried out using the Asclepion-Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser. Follow-up time was 6 months. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.02 +/- -1.04 D, and mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.06 +/- 0.02. Postoperatively, mean UCVA was 1.04 (better than 20/20), mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 1.22 (20/16), and average spherical equivalent refraction was -0.12 D; 98.6% (148 of 150 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D of intended refraction, and 100% were within +/-1.00 D. Concerning safety, in 71.1% of eyes (107 of 150) BSCVA was the same as preoperatively, and in 8.2% (11 of 150) it increased by two or more Snellen lines. None of the eyes lost two or more lines of BSCVA. The root mean square value for higher order aberrations increased 1.4 times following PRK. CONCLUSIONS: WASCA-guided PRK was efficacious, safe and predictable; BSCVA may be improved by the WASCA method compared to results achievable with a traditional PRK technique, in spite of an increase in the root mean square value for higher-order aberrations.     

Photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C versus LASIK in custom surgeries for myopia: a bilateral prospective randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To compare photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with prophylactic use of mitomycin C (MMC) and LASIK in custom surgeries for myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 patients with a minimum estimated ablation depth of 50 microm were randomized to receive PRK with MMC 0.002% for 1 minute in one eye and LASIK in the fellow eye. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), cycloplegic refraction, slit-lamp microscopy, contrast sensitivity, specular microscopy, aberrometry, and a subjective questionnaire were evaluated. Forty-two patients completed 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent refraction error before surgery and mean ablation depth were -3.99+/-1.20 diopters (D) and 73.09+/-14.55 microm in LASIK eyes, and -3.85+/-1.12 D and 70.7+/-14.07 microm in PRK with MMC eyes, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in PRK with MMC eyes 3 months (P=.04) and 6 months (P=.01) after surgery. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent refraction did not differ significantly in the groups during follow-up (P>.05). Significant haze was not observed in any PRK with MMC eye. Mean higher order aberration was lower in PRK with MMC eyes postoperatively compared with LASIK eyes (P=.01). Better contrast sensitivity was observed in PRK with MMC eyes than LASIK eyes (P<.05). The endothelial cell count did not differ significantly between groups (P=.65). In terms of visual satisfaction, PRK with MMC eyes were better rated. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy with MMC appears to be more effective than LASIK in custom surgery for moderate myopia. During 6-month follow-up, no toxic effects of MMC were evident. Long-term follow-up is necessary to attest its safety.     

Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D

PURPOSE: To compare laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and LASIK for the correction of high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, single-masked study was conducted. Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia > or = -7.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent manifest refraction) with a cylinder < or = -3.50 D (LASEK group) were compared to patients treated with LASIK (LASIK group) using the same excimer laser (Technolas 217C). Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% was applied for 1 minute in all LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive eyes were included in the study (114 in each group, matched for preoperative refraction). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -8.72 +/- 1.20 D in the LASEK group and -8.74 +/- 1.20 D in the LASIK group (range: -7.00 to -13.75 D) (P = .9). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was significantly lower in LASEK eyes 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P = .0001 for each comparison). No significant differences were found at 3 months postoperatively in UCVA (P = .3), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (P = .2), or in the safety (P = .6) and efficacy (P = .8) indices. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 or better in 34.2% of LASEK eyes and 44.7% of LASIK eyes. Spherical refraction was +0.25 +/- 0.6 D after LASEK and -0.06 +/- 0.5 D after LASIK (P = .0001). Sixty-eight percent of LASEK eyes and 79% of LASIK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction. No LASEK eye versus 7 LASIK eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA. Eight LASEK eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA versus 1 LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after LASEK with intraoperative MMC was significantly slower than after LASIK. Visual outcomes (UCVA, BSCVA, and safety and efficacy indices) 3 months after surgery were similar with both techniques for the correction of high myopia. Ten percent more eyes after LASIK were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction.     

Expanded range customcornea algorithms for myopia and astigmatism: one-month results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the early clinical results achieved with an algorithm adjusted for an expanded range of correction in wavefront-guided customized ablation with the LADARVision4000 (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Tex). METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive eyes from 31 patients underwent wavefront-guided, customablation laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (Hansatome and BD 4000 microkeratomes, LADARWave aberrometer, LADARVision4000 laser system). These were normal myopic and astigmatic eyes that had never been operated on. The spherical equivalent refractive error was +0.30 to -8.13 diopters (D) (mean -4.26 +/- 2.14 D) and the astigmatism ranged from 0 to -3.75 D (mean -0.97 +/- 0.96 D). eyes were treated according to the CustomCornea protocol using the commercial LADARVision4000 platform. Patients were followed for at least 2 months and standard visual measurements were taken and recorded at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The results of treatment were assessed using the following parameters: uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA); manifest spherical equivalent refractive error; wavefront measurement of high order aberrations; and subjective reports of visual symptoms by patients. RESULTS: One month after LASIK, the mean manifest spherical equivalent refractive error was -0.18 +/- 0.41 D. Seventy-eight percent and 96% of eyes had manifest spherical equivalent refractive error within +/-0.50 D and +/-1.00 D of attempted correction, respectively, with 78% of eyes with 20/20 or better UCVA. Eyes with 20/16 and 20/12.5 BSCVA were 89% and 36%, respectively (55% and 7% preoperatively). The mean high order aberrations root-mean-square was 0.34 +/- 0.10 microm preoperatively and 0.35 +/- 0.09 microm postoperatively (6.0-mm pupil size). High order aberrations were either reduced, unchanged, or increased by <10% in 58% of eyes. Subjectively, patients reported no visual symptoms and had no complaints regarding the quality of their vision. CONCLUSION: The new optimized algorithm for higher refractive errors appears to be effective in improving BSCVA, and a minority of patients demonstrated an increase in the magnitude of high order aberrations when compared to preoperative aberrometry. A slight spherical equivalent refraction undercorrection will be addressed with future nomogram adjustments.     

飞秒激光制瓣LASIK及TransPRK手术治疗近视对角膜像差的影响

目的 观察飞秒激光制瓣LASIK手术及TransPRK手术治疗低中度近视患者对角膜像差的影响。设计 前瞻性病例对照研究。研究对象 等效球镜度-1.00 ~ -6.75 D的近视患者73例131眼。方法 37例68眼行飞秒激光制瓣LASIK手术,36例63眼行TransPRK手术。均使用阿玛仕准分子激光消像差切削模式。术前及术后1、3、6个月进行视力、屈光度、波前像差仪检查。主要指标 视力、残余屈光度、彗差、球差、总高阶像差。结果 术后1个月,飞秒激光制瓣LASIK组裸眼视力达到或超过术前最佳矫正视力者为75%,TransPRK组为47.62%（P=0.001）。术后3个月及6个月,飞秒激光制瓣LASIK组裸眼视力达到或超过术前最佳矫正视力者分别为86.76%、91.18%,TransPRK组分别为79.37%、90.48% （P=0.26,0.89）。术后残余屈光度,在术后3个月TransPRK组（0.13±0.35 D）较飞秒激光制瓣LASIK组（-0.02±0.41 D）略高,术后1个月及6个月均无显著差别。两组术后高阶像差均较术前提高（P<0.001）。术后1个月角膜彗差在TransPRK组为（0.25±0.10 μm）,较飞秒激光制瓣LASIK组（0.30±0.17 μm）小（P=0.04）;术后3、6个月角膜彗差在TransPRK组分别为（0.28±0.10 μm）、（0.30±0.12 μm）,与飞秒激光制瓣LASIK组（0.31±0.16 μm）、（0.35±0.11 μm）相似（P=0.12,0.13）。术后各时间点两组的球差、总高阶像差差异均无统计学意义。结论 飞秒激光制瓣LASIK手术及TransPRK手术治疗低中度近视患者术后角膜像差均有所提高,术后1个月TransPRK角膜彗差较飞秒激光制瓣LASIK小,术后3个月及6个月两种手术方式对角膜像差的影响相似。（眼科,2015,24：225-229）     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia in eyes after retinal detachment surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia in eyes with previous retinal detachment surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive eyes that underwent LASIK after retinal detachment surgery. Data was collected regarding previous ocular surgery and its time prior to LASIK, intra- and postoperative complications, and visual outcome measures pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Ten eyes with previous retinal detachment surgery were scheduled for LASIK. One eye was excluded from data analysis as LASIK was aborted due to inadequate microkeratome suction because of conjunctival scarring. Nine eyes underwent an uneventful LASIK procedure. On average, LASIK was performed 130+/-123 months following retinal detachment surgery. Postoperative LASIK follow-up was 14.8+/-12.5 months. No significant intraoperative, postoperative, or retinal complications were observed. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -9.00+/-3.00 diopters (D), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.06+/-0.02, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.64+/-0.16. At the end of follow-up, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.65+/-0.88 D, mean UCVA was 0.57+/-0.14, and mean BSCVA was 0.72+/-0.19. Differences between BSCVA before and after LASIK were statistically significant (P=.038). At final follow-up, the safety index was 1.22 and efficacy index was 1.01. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis was found to be a safe and efficient option for treating refractive errors in eyes with previous retinal detachment surgery.     

Corneal wavefront-guided ablation with the Schwind ESIRIS laser for myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of corneal wavefront-guided LASIK for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This study included 56 myopic virgin eyes of 28 patients with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -4.40 +/- 1.83 diopters (D) (range: -1.25 to -9.75 D) and astigmatism < 2.50 D. The corneal wavefront aberrations were analyzed using a corneal topography system. The preoperative corneal wavefront aberration data obtained from the above analyses combined with manifest refraction were used to generate a customized ablation profile. The safety, efficacy, and predictability of the correction, contrast sensitivity, and corneal higher order wavefront aberrations were evaluated. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, the mean residual spherical equivalent refractive error was -0.15 +/- 0.3 D (range: 0 to -1.25 D) and mean cylinder was -0.54 +/- 0.34 D (range: 0 to -1.50 D). Ninety-five percent of eyes were in the residual refractive error range of +/- 0.50 D and uncorrected visual acuity improved by 1.00 D or better in 94% of eyes. The safety index and efficacy index were 1.13 and 0.92, respectively. After treatment, corneal higher order wavefront aberrations with a 6-mm pupil diameter increased significantly (paired sample t test, P < .01), and contrast sensitivity with glare had small reductions at high spatial frequencies. Changes in spherical-like aberration (R = 0.708, P < .001) and higher order wavefront aberration (R = 0.449, P = .001), except for coma-like aberration (P = .238), were positively correlated with the amount of achieved correction. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of clinical results showed that corneal wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism was safe and effective. There was an increase in all higher order aberrations postoperatively.     

Five year follow up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia

AIMS: To assess the long term refractive and visual outcome of patients who have laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of visual and refractive outcome of patients who had LASIK surgery performed in 1998 and 1999. All levels of myopia were included in the study. 49 patients attended for follow up. The main outcome measures were safety, predictability, efficacy, and stability. Postoperative complications and aberrations were also recorded. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -4.85. RESULTS: At 2 months postoperatively 67% of eyes were within plus or minus 0.5D of attempted correction with 81% within plus or minus 1.0D. At 5 years postoperatively 60% of eyes were within plus or minus 0.5D of attempted correction with 83% within plus or minus 1.0D. 88% of eyes had a vision of 6/12 or better at 2 months compared to 89% of eyes at 5 years. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was unchanged or improved in 51%. No eye lost more than one line of BSCVA. Overall, there was regression towards myopia with a mean change in refraction of -0.5D over the 5 years. As expected, severely myopic patients regressed more with a mean change of -1.06D. However, there was a high level of patient satisfaction with the surgery. CONCLUSION: LASIK surgery offers predictable results in terms of refractive and visual outcome with mild regression in refraction over time.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct residual myopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients underwent LASIK for the correction of residual myopia after cataract surgery. LASIK was carried out using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. In all eyes, the follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Before LASIK, 1 eye (4.5%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.5 or better; 12 months after LASIK, 10 eyes (45.4%) achieved this level of visual acuity and 0 eyes achieved 1.00 or better. Before LASIK, mean refraction was -2.90 +/- 1.80 D; 12 months after LASIK it decreased significantly to 0.40 +/- 0.60 D (P < .01). In 18 eyes (81.8%) at 12 months after LASIK, spherical equivalent refraction was within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia; 11 eyes (50%) were within 0.50 D. No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Automated Corneal Shaper and Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was an effective, predictable, stable, and safe procedure for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery. No intraocular lens or cataract incision related complications occurred when LASIK was performed at least 3 months after phacoemulsification.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia. SETTING: Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.     

CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser: Efficacy, predictability, and safety

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of custom laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Visx wavefront platform CustomVue for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Stanford University Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was of the initial 140 eyes of 78 patients treated consecutively with LASIK for myopia using the Visx Star S4 excimer laser. Primary outcome variables, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and complications, were evaluated at 1 week and 1 and 3 months. Vector analysis was performed on eyes that received astigmatic correction. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was reduced from -3.89 diopters +/- 1.48 (SD) to an SE of -0.21 +/- 0.36 D at 1 month and -0.28 +/- 0.36 D at 3 months (P < .001). At 1 and 3 months, UCVA was 20/20 or better in 84.3% and 87.9%, respectively. Eighty-six percent of eyes at 1 month and 81.4% of eyes at 3 months were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. No eyes lost more than 2 lines of BSCVA. Vector analysis yielded an index of success of 0.39, indicating a 61% success rate in achieving the astigmatic surgical correction at 3 months. The preoperative root-mean-square value of 0.28 +/- 0.08 microm increased slightly to 0.33 +/- 0.11 microm at 1 month and 0.34 +/- 0.11 microm at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASIK using the Visx CustomVue system was effective, predictable, and safe for correction of low to moderate myopic refractive error.     

Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the Alcon CustomCornea and the VISX CustomVue: three-month results

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the visual and clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the Alcon CustomCornea (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Tex) and VISX CustomVue (VISX, Santa Clara, Calif) systems. METHODS: Ninety-three eyes of 56 patients (50 and 43 consecutive eyes on CustomCornea and CustomVue, respectively) were enrolled in a prospective multisurgeon clinical outcome study. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and manifest refraction were measured at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured at 1 month and 3 months, and wavefront mapping at 3 months. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the CustomCornea group had a mean sphere of -3.90 +/- 1.62 diopters (D) (range -0.50 to -7.25 D), mean cylinder of +0.62 +/- 0.39 D (range 0 to +1.50 D), and mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -3.59 +/- 1.54 D. The CustomVue group had a sphere of -3.87 +/- 1.45 D (range -1.75 to -6.75 D), cylinder of +0.49 +/- 0.36 D (range 0 to +1.50 D), and manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -3.62 +/- 1.46 D. At 3 months, 98% of the CustomCornea group and 95% of the CustomVue group were within +/-0.50 D. Ninety-nine percent of eyes did not change >0.50 D (manifest spherical equivalent refraction) between 1 month and 3 months. CustomCornea eyes improved on contrast sensitivity testing and had a better profile than CustomVue for 20/15 Snellen and 20/12.5 ETDRS acuity. Both laser groups had a decrease in higher order aberrations with statistical significance for coma and spherical aberration in the CustomCornea group. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASIK with both systems is safe and effective.     

Wavefront-guided enhancements using the wavelight excimer laser in symptomatic eyes previously treated with LASIK

PURPOSE: To describe our clinical experience in wavefront-guided LASIK enhancements using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO system (WaveLight Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany) for symptomatic eyes previously treated with standard LASIK. METHODS: Twenty-six eyes of 20 patients with residual myopia, hyperopia, or mixed astigmatism and/or night vision symptoms after primary standard LASIK were considered for wavefront-guided customized retreatment using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE 200 Hz excimer laser system (model 106). Preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity, topography with the ALLEGRETTO Topolyzer, wavefront analysis using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE Tscherning Analyzer, and contrast sensitivity were compared to postoperative (enhancement) measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the original 26 eyes underwent wavefront-guided enhancement, 4 were excluded because they did not meet wavefront-guided treatment inclusion guidelines of this study. Mean follow-up was 8 months (range: 6 to 13 months, standard deviation [SD] 2). All patients were within +/- 0.50 diopters (manifest refraction) of intended postoperative refraction. The mean preoperative BSCVA improved from 20/25 (SD +/- 0.12) to 20/18 (SD +/- 0.1) postoperatively. All patients gained at least one line of BSCVA, and a maximum of three lines. There was no loss of BSCVA in any patient. The total amount of high order aberrations (RMSH) decreased from an average of 1.04 (SD +/- 0.22) to 0.46 (SD +/- 0.14) microm. Patients also had a mean improvement in low contrast sensitivity of 59%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this small series, customized wavefront-guided enhancements using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO system in patients who underwent previous LASIK appear to be safe and effective in correcting residual refractive error, reducing high order aberrations, and improving visual symptoms when reliable and reproducible measurements are achieved.     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗超高度近视远期疗效分析

目的探讨准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗超高度(等效球镜度数>-10.00 D)近视的远期效果和安全性.方法对99例(173只眼)超高度近视行LASIK矫正,术前屈光度数-10.00～-23.50 D,平均(-13.7±3.6)D(等效球镜),其中-15.00 D以上41只眼.常规行裂隙灯显微镜、三面镜眼底检查、OrbscanⅡ眼前段分析系统、眼压、A超、角膜测厚、电脑验光、散瞳检影、主观验光等检查.术后随访18个月以上.结果术后18个月时裸眼视力≥0.5者148只眼(85.6%),最佳矫正视力高于或等于术前最佳矫正视力者147只眼(84.4%),未见术后最佳矫正视力较术前最佳矫正视力低于2行以上的眼;屈光度数稳定在±1.00 D以下者109只眼(63.0%),术前屈光度数在-14.75 D以下和-15.00 D以上达到±1.00 D内者的百分数分别为73.5%(97只眼/132只眼)和29.3%(12只眼/41只眼).术后角膜后表面前移,术后3个月时后表面顶点距理想球面的距离为(0.069±0.031)mm,18个月为(0.065±0.025)mm,均大于术前的(0.029±0.010)mm;角膜微皱褶2只眼,诉暗视力下降眩光6例(10只眼).结论 LASIK矫正超高度近视有效安全,同时在选择手术适应证方面应谨慎从之.对于屈光度数太高而角膜厚度偏薄者行LASIK应慎重,可考虑其他方法矫正如晶状体屈光手术或联合手术.(中华眼科杂志,2004,40816-818)     

Alcon CustomCornea wavefront-guided retreatments after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of wavefront-guided ablations for the correction of residual myopia and astigmatism after standard laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Twenty nine eyes of 26 patients who underwent wavefront-guided LASIK retreatment with Alcon CustomCornea (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Tex) were evaluated. Complete ophthalmologic examination, corneal topography, and wavefront measurements were performed. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and wavefront analysis were evaluated preoperatively, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Wavefront measurements were assessed using the LADARWave device. Statistical analysis was performed using the McNemar test and percentages of success. RESULTS: One week postoperatively, UCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% of eyes (> or =20/20 in 31%) and BSCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% (> or =20/20 in 73%). Wavefront analysis showed a decrease in total aberrations, high order aberrations, defocus, coma, spherical aberration, and other terms of higher order aberrations at 1-week follow-up. Three months postoperatively, UCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% of eyes (> or =20/20 in 38%) and BSCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% (> or =20/20 in 81%). Six months postoperatively, UCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% of eyes (> or =20/20 in 60%) and BSCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% (> or =20/20 in 90%). Wavefront analysis showed decrease in total aberration, high order aberration, defocus, coma, and spherical aberration. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASIK retreatment in post-LASIK eyes represents a good option for laser vision correction. All eyes showed reduction in pre-existing total aberrations. Some high order aberration components decreased in this initial series. Further follow-up is necessary to assess the initial predictability of wavefront-guided LASIK upgrade.     

LASIK for myopia with the Zeiss meditec MEL 80

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate a new high-speed, small spot-scanner laser for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism between -1.00 and -8.25 diopters (D) and up to -2.75 D astigmatism underwent LASIK treatment using the MEL 80 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and aberrometry. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 20/20, which improved to 20/18 postoperatively. Postoperative UCVA was 20/20 at 1 month and 20/18 at 1 year. Uncorrected visual acuity > or = 20/20 was achieved in 58 (83%) of 70 eyes at 1 month and in 60 (88%) of 68 eyes at 1 year. The average refractive error before LASIK was -4.41 +/- 1.98 D. The mean residual refractive error was 0.14 +/- 0.31 D at 1 month and 0.13 +/- 0.30 D at 1 year. At 1-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively, 66 (94%) of 70 eyes and 65 (96%) of 68 eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refractive correction. No eye lost two lines. At 1 month 17% of eyes and at 1 year 13% of eyes gained two lines or more. Between 1-month and 1-year follow-up, 100% of eyes were stable. Mean root-mean-square high order aberration changed from 0.20 microm preoperatively to 0.28 microm postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The MEL 80 is effective and safe in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism.