Apocrine epithelium of the breast: does it result from metaplasia?

 Benign and malignant breast lesions may show an apocrine epithelium considered to be the result of metaplasia. In an attempt to clarify the histogenesis of the breast apocrine epithelium we searched for the presence of apocrine cells or cells with apocrine differentiation during human breast development. We analysed 10 autopsy specimens of female breasts from fetuses between 28 and 40 weeks of gestational age and tissue from 6 normal breasts, obtained after breast reduction in nulliparous young women between 22 and 28 years of age. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were stained with haematoxylin-eosin, PAS-diastase and a monoclonal antibody (BRST-2) anti-GCDFP-15, which is a specific apocrine marker. A 40-week fetal breast was analysed by electron microscopy. No cells with histological and ultrastructural apocrine features were found in the ducts of fetal breasts. All fetal breasts showed some ducts with sparse GCDFP-15-immunoreactive cells; the number of these cells increased with gestational age. PAS-diastase was negative. No cells with apocrine morphology were found in ducts and lobules of normal adult breasts. Scattered GCDFP-15-positive luminal epithelial cells and rare PAS-diastase-positive cells were observed in some lobules of all adult breasts. Cells with biochemical characteristics (GCDFP-15 expression) of apocrine differentiation are evident during human fetal breast development and persist in adult mammary glands. Unknown stimuli may induce these cells to take on an apocrine morphology. Apocrine epithelium of the breast may be a normal process of differentiation rather than metaplasia. We suggest the term ”apocrine differentiation precursor cells” for GCDFP-15-positive breast epithelial cells with no apocrine morphology. Received: 14 February 1997 / Accepted: 12 April 1997     

The ultrastructural localization of gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP-15) in breast epithelium.

GCDFP-15 is a major constituent protein of 15,000-dalton monomer size present in breast gross cystic disease fluid. Immunoperoxidase staining of GCDFP-15 has shown the protein to be present in normal apocrine epithelium, metaplastic apocrine epithelium of the breast, and breast carcinomas with apocrine features. To delineate ultrastructurally the localization of GCDFP-15 in benign breast epithelium, a low-temperature embedding colloidal gold technique was used. Metaplastic apocrine epithelium of the breast showed GCDFP-15 to be localized in Golgi vesicles and cytoplasmic granules. At the cell apices these granules were contained in vacuoles and appeared to be released by exocytosis. There was labeling of cyst fluid within microcyst lumens. This report is the first to ultrastructurally characterize this protein and its mode of secretion.     

Expression of apocrine differentiation markers in neuroendocrine breast carcinomas of aged women.

Neuroendocrine (NE) breast carcinomas are a rare entity in young women; however, their frequency increases in aged patients. The present work demonstrates that NE breast carcinomas in elderly women can also express an apocrine immunophenotype and analyzes the histological and clinical aspects of such differentiation. A selected series of 50 NE tumors (positive for NE markers in >/=50% of the cells) was tested for the immunocytochemical expression of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15). The results demonstrated that about 50% of moderately (G2) and well-differentiated (G1) NE breast carcinomas (mucinous, solid papillary, and solid cohesive histotypes) coexpressed the apocrine marker. In these cases, specific mRNA for GCDFP-15 (PIP) and for chromogranin A (ChA) was demonstrated using in situ hybridization (ISH). Carcinomas of the alveolar subtype (G2) and poorly differentiated carcinomas (G3), including one case of atypical carcinoid, were pure NE carcinomas, devoid of apocrine differentiation. The steroid receptor status of these lesions was evaluated to test a possible involvement of androgen receptors in apocrine differentiation. We demonstrated that the level of AR and the mean age of patients at diagnosis were significantly higher in apocrine than in nonapocrine differentiated tumors. The histological grade and the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) significantly influenced the prognosis of these NE carcinomas, either pure or NE-apocrine differentiated. The most original result of our study is therefore the demonstration of a possible divergent apocrine differentiation of NE breast carcinomas that might be regulated by the activation of androgen receptors in elder patients. In addition, the possibility for using Chs or GCDFP-15 serum values in the follow-up of these patients, as demonstrated in two cases of the present series, can justify the immunophenotyping of the tumors.     

Comparative study of monoclonal antibody B72.3 and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 as markers of apocrine carcinoma of the breast

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) is a commonly used apocrine marker; however, its expression was recently found to decrease in infiltrating, larger, or metastasizing apocrine carcinomas of the breast. In the breast, monoclonal antibody (MAb) B72.3 has been reported to be useful as an apocrine marker although it is used for that purpose much less frequently than GCDFP-15. In the search for a more consistent apocrine marker, immunoreactivity for MAb B72.3 was examined in apocrine carcinomas at different stages and compared with GCDFP-15. 47 of 51 apocrine carcinomas (92%) and 9 of 62 ordinary carcinomas (15%) were MAb B72.3 positive, while 39 of 51 apocrine carcinomas (76%) and 13 of 62 ordinary carcinomas (21%) were GCDFP-15 positive. Thus, both sensitivity and specificity were higher for MAb B72.3. Furthermore, unlike GCDFP-15, MAb B72.3 exhibited positivity irrespective of infiltrating status, tumor size, or metastatic status. There was no correlation between MAb B72.3-immunoreactivity and GCDFP-15-expression. The combined usage of MAb B72.3 with GCDFP-15 was useful to confirm the diagnosis of apocrine carcinoma, especially for advanced tumors, with only two cases being negative for both MAb B72.3 and GCDFP-15. Whether these two cases should be differentiated from ordinary apocrine carcinomas remains to be investigated.     

PIP/GCDFP-15 gene expression and apocrine differentiation in carcinomas of the breast

The frequency and the significance of apocrine differentiation in carcinomas of the breast are uncertain, because of the lack of reliable and reproducible criteria for morphological diagnosis. The 15 kDa glycoprotein of cystic breast disease (GCDFP-15) is regarded as a specific functional marker of apocrine cells. Expression of the prolactin-inducible protein (PIP)/GCDFP-15 gene was investigated by Northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization in breast cancer cell lines and in an unselected series (33 cases) of primary carcinomas of the breast. On the same cases, histological assessment of apocrine differentiation and immunocytochemical detection of GCDFP-15 were also performed and correlated with follow-up data. The presence of PIP/GCDFP-15 mRNA was a feature of a relatively high number of cases, but was incompletely correlated with histological and immunocytochemical evidences of apocrine differentiation. Expression of the PIP/GCDFP-15 gene was significantly associated with relapse-free survival, and may represent a novel variable of functional and prognostic relevance.Work supported by grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca ca sul Cancro (AIRC) (Milan, Italy), Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche (CNR, grant N. 93.02125.PF39), Ministero dell' Universita' e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MURST), Rome, Italy.     

Apocrine carcinoma of the breast. A morphologic and immunocytochemical study.

The mode of recognition and hence the frequency of apocrine differentiation in breast carcinomas, assessed on purely morphologic grounds, remains uncertain. One hundred consecutive cases of breast carcinoma were studied in order to establish the incidence of this type of tumor. With the use of an immunocytochemical method for the detection of GCDFP-15, a protein present in apocrine epithelium and in the fluid of tension cyst of the breast, the presence of apocrine differentiation was confirmed in 4 cases initially diagnosed as apocrine carcinomas on histologic grounds. Eight additional cases contained immunoreactive cells: 1 contained 10% of positive cells scattered throughout the tumor, and the other 7 cases were only focally positive. In 4 of these latter cases positive staining was confined to the in situ component. The ultrastructural findings in 2 cases of apocrine carcinoma are discussed in order to link the morphologic features for recognizing this tumor type and the presence of the antigenic apocrine marker.     

Cell-type- and tumour-type-related patterns of bcl-2 reactivity in mesenchymal cells and soft tissue tumours

 GCDFP-15, a glycoprotein identified in the cyst fluid of cystic breast disease, is considered to be a marker of apocrine differentiation. Studies on GCDFP-15 localization in adult normal tissues are lacking, and no information on GCDFP-15 expression during fetal development has been reported. We investigated GCDFP-15 expression in a large series of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded normal human adult and fetal tissues using the monoclonal antibody BRST-2. In normal adult tissues GCDFP-15 expression was found in all apocrine, lacrimal, ceruminous and Moll’s glands and in numerous serous cells of the submandibular, sublingual and minor salivary glands. The serous cells of nasal and bronchial glands were also positive; parotid and laryngeal glands showed rare immunoreactive cells. GCDFP-15-positive cells were observed in all cutaneous eccrine glands from different body sites. In fetal tissues immunoreactivity was observed in numerous acinous cells of all tracheal, bronchial and submandibular salivary glands. GCDFP-15 positivity was identified in numerous cells of all axillary sweat glands and in rare cells of some sweat glands of the thorax, abdomen, back, leg and arm. In both apocrine and nonapocrine glands GCDFP-15 was always localized in the secretory component. These data suggest that GCDFP-15 is a glandular differentiation marker associated with apocrine secretion; that it is expressed in glands that have phylogenetic origins in common with apocrine glands (submandibular salivary and submucosal bronchial glands); and that eccrine cutaneous glands express GCDFP-15 and thus might be referred to as mixed apocrine-eccrine glands. GCDFP-15 is expressed during fetal development and may represent a common marker of embryologically linked glandular structures. Received: 22 May 1997 / Accepted: 15 September 1997     

The enigmatic nature of apocrine breast lesions

Epithelial cells of fetal breast glandular structures, at the third trimester of pregnancy (28 weeks), produce GCDFP-15, in the absence of specific apocrine morphology. Apocrine epithelium of the breast may be a normal process of differentiation rather than a result of metaplasia, and it has been demonstrated that it is estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor and bcl-2 negative, but androgen-receptor (AR) positive. The significance of AR expression in apocrine epithelium is uncertain. Apocrine epithelium is seen in a wide spectrum of breast entities, ranging from benign lesions to invasive carcinoma. Breast cancer accounts 32% of all cancer cases among women and is the most common type of cancer in women. Little is known about breast carcinogenesis. Widely, it is accepted that breast cancer, like most other type of cancer, is being developed through the accumulation of genetic aberrations. Apocrine epithelium may reflect instability of the breast epithelium, creating an environment favouring further oncogenic alterations. In the last decade, several lines of evidence support the idea that some breast benign epithelial apocrine lesions are clonal lesions and may be considered as truly pre-malignant or precursors of breast carcinoma. Apocrine changes in many cases do not present any diagnostic difficulty; on the other hand, apocrine proliferations with cytologic atypia can be particularly difficult and challenging. The purpose of this study is to collect and highlight the areas of consensus in the literature as well as the controversial areas concerning the apocrine epithelium of the breast.     

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 in salivary gland tumors

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) is a 15-kd glycoprotein that is expressed by normal apocrine epithelia and in a majority of breast carcinomas. However, recent studies have demonstrated that this substance is also present in tumors of the salivary glands, sweat glands, and prostate gland. To determine whether the expression of CGDFP-15 might aid in the differential diagnosis of salivary gland lesions, the anti-GCDFP-15 monoclonal antibody D6 was applied to paraffin sections of 133 such neoplasms. Benign tumors (76% reactive) were more often labeled than malignant lesions (28% reactive) by this antibody; overall, 53 (41%) of 133 cases were positive for GCDFP-15. Notably, the tubuloglandular components in 17 (81%) of 21 pleomorphic adenomas were reactive, but no example of either adenoid cystic carcinoma or polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma were labeled. In contrast, 24% of adenocarcinomas stained with this antibody. The apparent expression of GCDFP-15 by a spectrum of salivary gland tumors supports their biologic relationship to lesions of the cutaneous apocrine glands and breast. Furthermore, the demonstration of this determinant may be of use in suggesting the salivary gland nature of poorly differentiated carcinomas of the head and neck, and it may facilitate the separation of pleomorphic adenoma from histologically similar malignant neoplasms in the salivary glands themselves.     

Bilateral apocrine carcinoma of the breast Molecular and immunocytochemical evidence for two independent primary tumours

Apocrine carcinoma is an uncommon variant of breast cancer. The frequency of bilaterality in patients who have apocrine carcinoma in one breast is not significantly different from that for bilateral mammary carcinomas in general, but bilateral apocrine carcinomas are very uncommon. We report on a bilateral apocrine carcinoma of the breast in a 74-year-old woman. The apocrine differentiation in both tumours was confirmed by the positivity of the cytoplasmic granules for PAS after diastase digestion and immunoreactivity for GCDFP-15 and sialyl-Tn. The tumour in the right breast showed immunohistochemical expression of p53, and a mutation was demonstrated by PCR-SSCP; the tumour in the left breast was negative for p53 on immunohistochemistry, and no mutation was found at the molecular level. c-erbB2 expression was not detected in the right tumour but there was overexpression (at the cell membrane) in the left tumour. Both tumours were aneuploid: the right tumour displayed multiple stemlines, whereas the left tumour had a triploid profile. Using the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique we demonstrated that both tumours displayed chromosome 17 polysomy and numerical abnormalities of chromosome 1, polysomy in the right and monosomy in the left tumour. We conclude that the two tumours are probably independent, as are most bilateral carcinomas of the breast.     

Mammaglobin vs GCDFP-15: an immunohistologic validation survey for sensitivity and specificity

There are limited data that compare the usefulness of mammaglobin with gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) in the identification of breast carcinomas. Whole tissue sections of 29 breast carcinomas with matched lymph node metastases and 63 breast carcinomas on tissue microarray were stained with mammaglobin cocktail and GCDFP-15 antibodies. In addition, tissue microarrays (US Biomax, Rockville, MD) containing 544 different human tumors were also stained with the mammaglobin antibody cocktail. Positive staining was seen in 67 (55.4%) of 121 breast carcinomas with mammaglobin and in 28 cases (23.1%) with GCDFP-15. In the majority of cases, the staining intensity and number of cells staining were higher with mammaglobin than with GCDFP-15. Positive mammaglobin staining was also seen in 44 (8.1%) of 544 nonbreast tumors. Mammaglobin is a more sensitive marker than GCDFP-15 for breast carcinoma; however, it lacks the specificity of GCDFP-15.     

Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast with histiocytoid features: three cases

Histiocytoid carcinoma of the breast, a cellular variant of invasive breast cancer, is mainly found among infiltrating lobular carcinomas (ILC). It can be easily confused with benign conditions or other mammary tumors also composed of cells with a pink granular to foamy cytoplasm and an eccentric nucleus. We report 3 cases of histiocytoid ILC. Our aim is to discuss recent immunocytochemical data that could suggest a special type of apocrine differentiation of tumor cells, including a diffuse immunoreactivity for GCDFP-15 (Gross Cystic Disease Fluid Protein 15) and a predominant expression of androgen receptor, and to describe the features useful for the differential diagnosis.     

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: an aggressive tumor showing apocrine differentiation.

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast is a recently recognized subtype of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Cytologic features are pleomorphic to a degree that contrasts with the cytologic uniformity of classic ILC. It is this feature that simultaneously gives its name to the tumor and highlights the difficulty of identifying it correctly and distinguishing it from ductal carcinoma. In our series of 10 cases, six tumors also contained lobular carcinoma in situ. Nodal metastases were typically sinusoidal. All tumors showed the dissociated, linear, and single file pattern of classic ILC, together with a targetoid distribution. Intracytoplasmic lumina were present in 50% of the tumors. An eosinophilic, slightly granular cytoplasm suggests the possibility of apocrine differentiation, a suggestion derived also from the frequent presence of foamy cells, a cell type previously identified in histiocytoid lobular carcinoma and shown to have apocrine features. The GCDFP-15 apocrine marker was positive in all 10 tumors, while all control ILCs were negative, confirming the presence of apocrine differentiation in pleomorphic lobular carcinoma. Six of 10 patients died within 42 months of diagnosis. Three other patients developed recurrence or distant metastases at short intervals. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma is a very aggressive tumor. This behavior is perhaps predictable on the basis of tumor size at presentation and the frequency of nodal metastases. Since grading of lobular carcinoma is difficult, recognition of the pleomorphic subtype is useful in identifying a lethal variant.     

Poorly differentiated cutaneous apocrine carcinomas: histopathological clues and immunohistochemical analysis for the diagnosis of this unusual neoplasm

Primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma (PCAC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy that is derived from apocrine glands. Histologically, these tumours can appear well-differentiated where diagnosis should be relatively straightforward. However, occasionally these tumours can exhibit high-grade features, and in such instances the diagnosis can be challenging. A retrospective analysis of 12 cases of poorly differentiated PCAC, obtained from large academic institutions, was performed, and summarised below. Immunohistochemical studies were performed in all cases with antibodies against CK7, p63, CAM 5.2, GCDFP-15, GATA3, CEA, PR, ER, HER2, calponin, SMA, androgen receptor and EMA. All 12 cases were poorly differentiated; however, there were some histopathological clues to the diagnosis of apocrine carcinoma; namely, the presence of focal glandular formation, acrosyringial involvement and the presence of single ‘pagetoid’ cells within epidermis. All tumours were consistently positive for CK7, GATA3 and GCDFP-15 and negative for p63. The tumours had variable expression of CAM5.2, CEA, ER, PR, HER2, androgen receptor and EMA. In three cases, there was a preservation of the myoepithelial cell layer (with calponin and SMA), which also confirmed the primary cutaneous origin. PCAC is a difficult neoplasm to diagnose, as it can appear identical to metastatic carcinomas. We describe 12 cases of poorly differentiated PCAC, highlighting their salient clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical features, and discuss the potential diagnostic pitfalls in distinguishing this entity from other malignant neoplasms. Our results indicate that a combination of thorough histological inspection coupled with an adequate battery of immunohistochemical stains is necessary to support the diagnosis of PCAC.     

Her-2 expression in cutaneous eccrine and apocrine neoplasms.

Cutaneous eccrine and apocrine glands have many histologic and immunologic similarities to ducts and acini of the breast. Thus, differentiating a primary cutaneous process from a metastatic breast carcinoma can be nearly impossible. In all, 10-34% of breast carcinomas overexpress HER-2 protein, a membrane-associated protein that functions in cell differentiation, adhesion and motility. As expression of this gene in cutaneous neoplasms has not been well characterized, we sought to determine HER-2 expression in a sample of benign and malignant cutaneous eccrine and apocrine neoplasms and to determine if there is value in using this protein expression in differentiating primary cutaneous from metastatic breast lesions. Totally, 85 primary cutaneous neoplasms and 11 cutaneous metastases from HER-2-positive breast carcinomas were retrieved from archived material at our institute. All cases were evaluated for HER-2 protein expression using the Dako Hercept Test kit. Membranous HER-2 staining was noted in three of the 85 cutaneous adnexal neoplasms: one hidrocystoma and two nodular hidradenomas. Seven of the 11 cutaneous metastases from HER-2-positive breast carcinomas maintained moderate-to-strong HER-2 expression. In conclusion, while 10-34% of breast carcinomas overexpress the HER-2 protein, only 3.5% of cutaneous apocrine and eccrine neoplasms in this study stained with the HER-2 antibody. These HER-2-positive cutaneous neoplasms typically do not pose a diagnostic dilemma in the setting of differentiation from breast metastasis. Additionally, although histologically these breast and cutaneous lesions may have morphologic similarities, the relative lack of HER-2 overexpression suggests that they are different nosologically. Finally, this study suggests that HER-2 protein expression can be a useful tool in differentiating a primary cutaneous appendageal neoplasm from HER-2 expressing metastatic breast carcinoma.     

Vulvar apocrine adenocarcinoma: a case with nodal metastasis and intranodal mucinous differentiation

Primary vulvar adenocarcinomas are rare tumors, and their histogenesis is not fully understood. They are classified into extramammary Paget's disease, sweat gland carcinomas, and "breast-like" adenocarcinomas of the vulva. The latter resemble adenocarcinomas arising in the breast morphologically and immunophenotypically. Rare cases of adenocarcinoma with apocrine features have been reported, and whether these neoplasms originate from the "native apocrine" sweat glands or from "anogenital mammary-like" glands are still debatable. The presence of normal mammary-like glands in the vicinity of the tumor, the transitional malignant morphological features from normal mammary-like glands and the tumor, the breast-like histological features of the tumor, and the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors generally suggest an origin from anogenital mammary-like glands. Absence of these features points toward native apocrine sweat glands as the source of these neoplasms. In this report, we present a patient who was initially diagnosed with Paget's disease of the right vulva, which was treated by hemi-vulvectomy, and who later presented with primary vulvar apocrine adenocarcinoma with metastasis to the inguinal lymph nodes and intranodal mucinous/colloidal differentiation: a feature, to the best of our knowledge, not reported before. We also reviewed the histogenesis of the vulvar adenocarcinomas, with emphasis on the morphological features that separate the tumors arising from the anogenital mammary-like glands in the vulva from those arising from the native vulvar sweat glands.     

Monoclonal antibody B72.3 immunostaining of breast carcinoma. Patterns of staining and relationship to mucin content and GCDFP-15 reactivity.

Around 80% of breast carcinomas express the tumor-associated glycoprotein-72, as demonstrated by positive immunostaining with the monoclonal antibody B72.3. We have investigated the pattern of B72.3 immunostaining in 88 breast carcinomas of different types, with the use of an immunoperoxidase technique. As tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 has mucinlike properties and is usually present in cells that show apocrine differentiation, we have also compared the results of B72.3 immunostaining in these tumors with the staining results for mucin and GCDFP-15, which is another antibody that recognizes apocrine differentiation. A variable degree of B72.3 immunostaining was seen in 60 cases (68%). The staining patterns varied with the histological type and sometimes within the same type. A significant relationship was demonstrated between B72.3 positivity and the presence of acidic mucin in the tumors, but not with their staining for GCDFP-15. The extent, distribution, and pattern of immunostaining for B72.3 varies in different types of breast carcinoma; this fact has to be taken into consideration if radiolabeled B72.3 monoclonal antibodies are going to be used for therapeutic purposes.     

An immunohistochemical study of the tissue distribution of the breast cyst fluid protein, zinc alpha2 glycoprotein

Zinc alpha 2 glycoprotein is one of the proteins present in breast cyst fluids, being found at levels 30-50 times its plasma concentration. Using an immunoperoxidase technique the distribution of this glycoprotein has been studied in a range of non-mammary tissues and carcinomas, as well as in normal, benign and malignant breast specimens. The breast cyst fluid protein was detected in all apocrine cells of skin and in the apocrine metaplastic epithelium lining of breast cysts. A progression was apparent from normal to hyperplastic breast in the number of cells reacting, particularly of cystically dilated acini, to a final consistent staining of apocrine-lined cysts. Zinc alpha 2 glycoprotein was demonstrated in 16 of 33 invasive carcinomas, 15 of which were eosinophilic on haematoxylin and eosin staining, and in one of three non-invasive carcinomas. No staining was apparent in other non-mammary tissues and carcinomas apart from weak reactivity of serous cells of the parotid gland. Zinc alpha 2 glycoprotein is, therefore, a reliable immunohistochemical marker of apocrine cell differentiation.     

E-cadherin immunohistochemical analysis of histiocytoid carcinoma of the breast

Histiocytoid carcinoma is a rare type of invasive breast carcinoma. It has been considered to be a variant of lobular carcinoma, a variant of apocrine ductal carcinoma, and an apocrine variant of lobular carcinoma and to resemble lipid-rich carcinoma. In attempts to elucidate its histogenesis, investigators have used mucin and oil red O histochemical analysis and GCDFP-15 immunostaining. E-cadherin is a relatively recent addition to the armamentarium of immunohistochemical markers used for cell differentiation and is a member of a family of transmembrane glycoproteins that has been shown to have a strong correlation with the histologic phenotypes of breast carcinoma. Most ductal carcinomas show diffuse membrane expression of E-cadherin, and lobular carcinomas are characterized by complete lack of membrane staining of E-cadherin. The object of this study was to use E-cadherin immunohistochemical analysis to help clarify the histogenesis of histiocytoid carcinoma. Fourteen cases containing the diagnosis of histiocytoid carcinoma of the breast were identified at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) from 1988 to 2001. All cases were rereviewed, histologic features were evaluated, and immunohistochemical staining with E-cadherin and GCDFP-15 was performed. Clinical information was extracted from the patients' medical records. Eleven cases met published histologic criteria for histiocytoid carcinoma. The remaining three cases were apocrine carcinoma. The pattern of tumor infiltration was solid, without secondary lumen formation in all cases of histiocytoid carcinoma. Lobular carcinoma in situ was identified in eight cases, but was absent in three. There was no E-cadherin immunohistochemical staining in eight of the 11 cases of histiocytoid carcinoma (72.7%). GCDFP-15 was immunoreactive in all 10 cases of histiocytoid carcinoma where it was performed. Follow-up data was available for nine of the 11 cases of histiocytoid carcinoma: six patients were alive with disease at 1.5 to 48 months, one patient had died of disease at 60 months, and two patients had no evidence of disease at 32 and 45 months. We conclude that histiocytoid carcinoma has an immunophenotypical profile consistent with both ductal and lobular differentiation. Moreover, the lack of consistent morphologic features, a specific clinical profile, and a distinct immunohistochemical pattern lead us to hypothesize that histiocytoid carcinoma is not a special type of breast cancer.     

Immunohistochemical localisation of androgen receptor in apocrine metaplasia and apocrine adenosis of the breast: relation to oestrogen and progesterone receptors

AIM: To investigate the receptor status of the sex steroid hormones in apocrine metaplasia of the breast. METHODS: 82 cases of apocrine metaplasia, including 18 of the rare lesion apocrine adenosis, were studied immunohistochemically for the expression of androgen receptor, oestrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor proteins on formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections. The standard avidin biotin complex (ABC) technique was followed and appropriate positive and negative controls were used. RESULTS: All the studied cases (82/82) were positive for androgen receptor, but were negative for oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor. CONCLUSIONS: Apocrine metaplastic epithelium, unlike the normal breast epithelium, is responsive to androgens, through androgen receptors, rather than to the female sex hormones. This may have clinical implications.