Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective cesarean vs. attempted vaginal delivery for breech presentation at or near term. METHODS: We reviewed the maternal and neonatal charts of all singleton breech deliveries of at least 35 weeks' gestation or 2000 g delivered between 1986 and 1997 at our institution. Patients delivered by elective cesarean were compared to those attempting a vaginal delivery. The neonatal outcomes analyzed were: corrected mortality; Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 min; abnormal umbilical cord blood gases; birth trauma; and admissions to the intensive care nursery. Maternal morbidity was also assessed and compared. RESULTS: Of 848 women meeting criteria for evaluation, 576 were delivered by elective cesarean while 272 attempted a vaginal delivery. Of 272 women undergoing a trial of labor, 203 (74.6%) were delivered vaginally, while 69 (25.4%) failed an attempt at vaginal delivery and underwent a cesarean. When comparing patients delivered by elective cesarean with those attempting a vaginal delivery, no significant differences were noted in neonatal outcomes. However, maternal morbidity was higher among women delivered by cesarean, regardless of the indications for the procedure. Similar neonatal and maternal results were noted when nulliparous patients were analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery of selected near-term infants presenting as breech is associated with increased maternal morbidity without corresponding improvement in neonatal outcomes.     

Balancing the risks of planned cesarean section and trial of vaginal delivery for the mature, selected, singleton breech presentation

The experience of mature, singleton, vaginal breech delivery over the last decade in our hospital is reviewed. This constitutes the largest series of breech delivery reported for over twelve years. Unlike all but two previous reports, we analyze our results by management policy; elective cesarean section, trial of vaginal breech delivery and cesarean section as soon as the diagnosis of breech delivery was made on labor ('expedite' cesarean operations). Six intrapartum or neonatal deaths occurred among 613 patients selected for trial of vaginal delivery--a rate of one per cent. There were none following 217 elective or 69 expedite cesarean sections. A detailed review of the literature over the last decade confirms that trial of vaginal delivery is more dangerous to the fetus and results in about one perinatal death of a normally formed infant in 200 deliveries. Apgar scores were slightly lower following trial of vaginal delivery and there were more irritable or injured babies in this group. The last intrapartum or neonatal death occurred in 1981. However, the elective cesarean section rate has increased from 14 to 33 per cent over this time period. Similarly the rate of failed trial of vaginal breech delivery has increased from 15 to 31 per cent. The proportion of failed trials was highest where the fetus was large but clinicians were poor at estimating fetal weight. Decision theory is used to examine the maternal utility of trial of vaginal breech delivery versus elective cesarean section when the intrapartum cesarean rate rises to these levels. It is shown that, from the point of view of maternal mortality and morbidity in the current pregnancy, trial of vaginal delivery maybe the more dangerous maternal option. Thus a low threshold for cesarean section in labor leads to greater fetal safety at the mother's expense. It is nevertheless concluded that maternal attitude and the long-term effects of a uterine scar should be considered in the final decision.     

Mode of delivery for breech presentation in grandmultiparous women.

OBJECTIVES: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of planned vaginal delivery vs. elective cesarean delivery for breech presentation at term. METHODS: Retrospective study of term breech deliveries from January 1997 through December 2000. A group of 128 women for whom vaginal delivery was planned was compared with a group of 122 women who had an elective cesarean delivery with regard to neonatal mortality and morbidity (birth trauma, birth asphyxia, hyperbilirubinemia, and duration of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit) and maternal morbidity (infections, hemorrhage, hysterectomy, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism). RESULTS: There was no difference in neonatal mortality and morbidity between the two groups (13.0% vs. 9.4%). There were fewer maternal complications in the planned vaginal group than in the elective cesarean group (5.5% vs. 18%; P<0.01). In the planned vaginal delivery group 70% of multiparas and 85% of grandmultiparas were delivered vaginally compared with 50% of nulliparas. CONCLUSIONS: In breech presentations at term vaginal delivery can be achieved in 85% of grandmultiparas without significant neonatal morbidity. Elective cesarean section is associated with increased maternal morbidity compared with planned vaginal delivery.     

Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report

Cesarean section has become the standard management used by many clinicians for breech presentation in labor. Proof of the superiority of routine cesarean section has been largely circumstantial. Concern over rising cesarean section rates has led to renewed interest in possible alternatives. Protocols have been developed to select which patients may be allowed a trial of labor with frank breech presentation at term. We undertook a prospective clinical trial comparing elective cesarean section with a selective management protocol for the nonfrank breech presentation at term. One hundred five patients with nonfrank breech presentations at term in labor were studied. Seventy (67%) were randomized to a trial of labor and 35 (33%) to elective cesarean section. Of the patients allowed a trial of labor, 31 (44%) were delivered vaginally, and 39 (56%) required cesarean section. The largest single cause of a "failed" trial of labor was inadequate pelvic dimensions on x-ray pelvimetry (23 patients, 59%). Neonatal morbidity assessed by Apgar scores, cord gases, birth injury, and hospital stay was not different for those delivered vaginally or by cesarean section. Maternal morbidity in terms of febrile morbidity, blood transfusion, wound infections, and hospital stay was significantly greater among women delivered by cesarean section. Two of three neonatal deaths occurred in infants with major congenital anomalies. The third infant, apparently normal, died after vaginal delivery. Extensive evaluation suggests the death was attributable to inadequate resuscitation. We conclude that the use of a selective management protocol under controlled conditions is a reasonable alternative to elective cesarean section. Approximately one half of patients allowed a trial of labor may be expected to deliver vaginally with neonatal morbidity comparable to that seen with cesarean section.     

Outcomes associated with cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery at a university hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vaginal breech delivery is associated with increased morbidity in term breech singletons using strict selection criteria. This study encompasses our previous studies (in 1987 and 1995) and extends our experience to 21 years. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from 1980 to 2001 including term, non-anomalous singleton breech deliveries selected by strict criteria. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for neonatal and maternal outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred and eleven women underwent cesarean section and 214 a trial of labor. We found greater overall maternal morbidity in the cesarean section group (odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.34-2.65). In the vaginal delivery group, neonates were more likely to have had >1 day of mechanical ventilation (OR 10.0, 95% CI=1.56-63.9). No maternal deaths occurred and no neonatal deaths or seizures occurred. CONCLUSION: Given our findings, offering a trial of vaginal breech delivery to well-counseled strictly selected patients remains an appropriate option.     

The problem of relating fetal outcome with breech presentation to mode of delivery

We retrospectively analyzed 546 consecutive singleton pregnancies with breech presentations that ended at ≧36 weeks of gestation for the relationship between the intended mode of delivery and fetal outcome. Twelve patients were excluded from the analysis because these infants had major malformations. Of the 534 remaining patients, 124 (23%) were delivered by elective cesarean section. The other 410 women (77%) went into spontaneous labor. Intrapartum emergency cesarean section was required in 112 (27%) of these 410 women; the other 298 (73%) were delivered vaginally. There were 5 poor neonatal outcomes: 3 perinatal deaths and 2 cases of cerebral palsy probably due to intrapartum asphyxia. The risk of poor outcome was thus 1.2% (5/410), in the intended vaginal delivery group vs. no such outcome in the group of 124 patients that had an elective cesarean section. Three of 5 infants with poor outcome were actually born by emergency cesarean section and comparisons of results according to ultimate method of delivery rather than according to intended method of delivery may be misleading and in our case would have been biased against cesarean section. Received: 4 July 1995 / Accepted: 21 December 1995     

Vaginal breech delivery of selected infants weighing more than 2000 grams. A retrospective analysis of seven years' experience

This retrospective study analyzes 580 term and near-term singleton pregnancies complicated by breech presentation from 1976 through 1982. Vaginal delivery was achieved in 174 patients (30%), 135 of which were selectively allowed a trial of labor. Six infant deaths occurred (1%); all were neonatal deaths directly related to lethal congenital anomalies, for a corrected neonatal mortality rate of 0%. No significant difference was found in the incidence of low Apgar scores, traumatic birth injury, or requirement for neonatal resuscitation between those infants delivered by cesarean section and those delivered vaginally. Although no maternal deaths occurred, cesarean section was associated with a 38-fold increase in significant maternal morbidity. These data suggest that with careful patient selection and fetal monitoring, vaginal delivery of the term or near-term breech infant remains a real alternative to routine cesarean delivery of all breech infants. A selection and management protocol is proposed.     

Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital

Objective: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes after elective repeat Cesarean section versus a trial of labor in women after one prior uterine scar.

Study design: All women with a previous single low transverse Cesarean section delivered at term with no contraindications to vaginal delivery were retrospectively identified in our database from January 1995 to October 1998. Outcomes were first analyzed by comparing mother–neonate dyads delivered by elective repeat Cesarean section to those undergoing a trial of labor. Secondarily, outcomes of mother–neonatal dyads who achieved a vaginal delivery or failed a trial of labor were compared to those who had elective repeat Cesarean delivery.

Results: Of 1408 deliveries, 749/927 (81%) had a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery. There were no differences in the rates of transfusion, infection, uterine rupture and operative injury when comparing trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. Neonates delivered by elective repeat Cesarean delivery were of earlier gestation and had higher rates of respiratory complications (p?<?0.05). Mother–neonatal dyads with a failed trial of labor sustained the greatest risk of complications.

Conclusion: Overall, neonatal and maternal outcomes compared favorably among women undergoing a trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. The majority of morbidity was associated with a failed trial of labor. Better selection of women likely to have a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery would be expected to decrease the risks of trial of labor.     

Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes after elective repeat Cesarean section versus a trial of labor in women after one prior uterine scar. STUDY DESIGN: All women with a previous single low transverse Cesarean section delivered at term with no contraindications to vaginal delivery were retrospectively identified in our database from January 1995 to October 1998. Outcomes were first analyzed by comparing mother-neonate dyads delivered by elective repeat Cesarean section to those undergoing a trial of labor. Secondarily, outcomes of mother-neonatal dyads who achieved a vaginal delivery or failed a trial of labor were compared to those who had elective repeat Cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Of 1408 deliveries, 749/927 (81%) had a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery. There were no differences in the rates of transfusion, infection, uterine rupture and operative injury when comparing trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. Neonates delivered by elective repeat Cesarean delivery were of earlier gestation and had higher rates of respiratory complications (p < 0.05). Mother-neonatal dyads with a failed trial of labor sustained the greatest risk of complications. CONCLUSION: Overall, neonatal and maternal outcomes compared favorably among women undergoing a trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. The majority of morbidity was associated with a failed trial of labor. Better selection of women likely to have a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery would be expected to decrease the risks of trial of labor.     

Breech presentation after cesarean section: always a section?

A retrospective review of 71 breech deliveries after previous cesarean was done to determine the need for repeat cesarean section. Twenty-four (33.8%) women were allocated to the elective repeat cesarean section group and forty-seven (66.2%) patients were allocated to a trial of labor group. Thirty-seven (78.7%) were delivered of their infants vaginally. A total of 37 of the 71 women (52.1%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Neonatal morbidity did not differ for women who were delivered vaginally or by cesarean section. Maternal febrile morbidity was significantly higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery group (p less than 0.001). On the basis of these data, a trial of labor seems reasonable in carefully selected cases of breech presentation after a previous cesarean section.     

Moderate neonatal morbidity after vaginal term breech delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the results of term breech births in our clinic with the Term Breech Trial (TBT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the investigation period prospective data were collected on all deliveries of a term baby in breech presentation. Some pregnant women were included in the TBT and randomized in a planned cesarean section (CS)-group and a planned vaginal birth (VB)-group. The remaining non-randomized women were divided into a primary CS-group and a started VB-group. Neonatal and maternal mortality and morbidity were analyzed retrospectively, according to the intended mode of delivery. RESULTS: Neonatal or maternal mortality occurred in none of the groups. Neither in the randomized group nor in the non-randomized group were significant differences in serious neonatal and maternal morbidity observed between the intended cesarean section-group and the group that started vaginal delivery. However, in the non-randomized group, moderate neonatal morbidity was significantly lower in the primary CS-group than in the started VB-group. CONCLUSION: The differences in moderate neonatal morbidity support the conclusion of the TBT, that primary cesarean section may be safer for the term breech baby than a trial of vaginal labor.     

Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option

OBJECTIVE: To examine the obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancies with singleton breech presentation at term when selection for vaginal delivery was based on clear prelabor and intrapartum criteria. METHODS: The outcomes of all pregnancies with a breech presentation after 37 weeks of gestation were retrospectively reviewed from January 1997 to June 2000. Criteria for prelabor cesarean or trial of vaginal breech delivery included type of breech, estimated fetal weight (more than 3,800 g), maternal preference, and gestation more than 41 weeks. An intrapartum protocol excluded induction and oxytocin augmentation of labor, combined with a low threshold for cesarean delivery for dystocic labor; an experienced obstetrician was in attendance during labor and delivery. RESULTS: Of 641 women, 343 (54%) underwent prelabor cesarean, and 298 (46%) had a trial of vaginal delivery, of whom 146 (49%) delivered vaginally. Significantly fewer nulliparas (58 of 158, 37%) than multiparas (88 of 140, 63%; P <.001) achieved vaginal delivery after trial of labor. Significantly more infants weighing more than 3,800 g were selected for prelabor (87 of 343, 25%) and intrapartum (31 of 152, 20%) cesarean than delivered vaginally (15 of 146, 10%). Two neonates (0.7%) had Apgar scores of less than 7 at 5 minutes; both were neurologically normal at 6 weeks. There were no nonanomalous perinatal deaths and no cases of significant trauma or neurological dysfunction; 3 infants delivered vaginally died due to lethal anomalies. CONCLUSION: Safe vaginal breech delivery at term can be achieved with strict selection criteria, adherence to a careful intrapartum protocol, and with an experienced obstetrician in attendance. Our protocol effectively selects larger infants for cesarean delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2     

Management of term breech presentation: A protocl of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor

Objective: The results of a program of external version and selective trial of labor for term breech presentation are reviewed. This is a follow-up to our 1987 report describing management of singleton, term breech presentations and expands our 16-year experience to 1180 cases.Study design: All term breech presentations cared for in 1985 through 1992 are reviewed and outcome contrasted with those predicted in our earlier report. During these 8 years a trial of external version was offered if a breech presentation was identified after 36 completed weeks' gestation and before active labor. The criteria for allowing a trial of labor are detailed.Results: Four hundred sixty-four breech presentations were identified for review. Three hundred eighty-two (82%) were diagnosed before active labor. Of these, 344 (90%) underwent an attempt at external version, of which 174 (51%) were successful. The 290 breech presentations where version either was not attempted or was unsuccessful were stratified into three groups: cesarean section without labor (147), trial of labor with cesarean section (90), and trial of labor with vaginal delivery (53). The 174 cases where version was successful were stratified into two additional groups on the basis of the eventual route of delivery. Careful review of maternal and fetal variables indicates that a trial of labor in selected patients resulted in vaginal delivery in only 37% but was achieved without an increase in fetal or maternal mortality or morbidity. Surprisingly, 54 of the 174 cases where version was successful were ultimately delivered by cesarean section. This 31% rate of cesarean delivery is significantly higher than the 15% rate observed for all cases of term, singleton vertex presentation. A higher prevalence of cases complicated by failed progress in labor and failed induction contributed to the excess.Conclusion: External version is successful in 51% of cases of term breech presentation. With careful selection, cases where version has failed can be allowed to labor and be delivered vaginally. The incidence of cesarean section (31%) for those cases where a version had been successful was surprisingly high, largely because of an increase in labor abnomalities and failed labor inductions.     

Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for all cases

In this study, the concepts of decision theory have been applied to a clinical obstetric controversy--the management of the selected mature breech presentation. We have reviewed in detail the literature published since 1974 and estimated the probabilities of various outcomes after different treatment strategies. We conclude that a policy of selected vaginal delivery will result in four perinatal deaths for every 1000 patients delivered. A similar probability of neurologic handicap, at least until discharge from hospital, can also be attributed to this method of delivery. These unfavorable outcomes were reported less frequently in more recent reports covering the years since 1974. In these cases, the probability of fetal death due to a trial of vaginal delivery is approximately two in 1000. Cesarean section rates have risen, however, and 18-40% of trials of labor for breech presentation now result in "emergency" cesarean section. Decision analysis has demonstrated that a policy of elective cesarean section for all cases would not necessarily increase maternal mortality and morbidity. Thus the greater dangers of emergency compared with nonelective surgery may abolish the advantages of attempting a vaginal delivery. Depending on the relative dangers of elective and emergency cesarean section, planned delivery becomes the safer option when 16-30% of trials of vaginal breech delivery are unsuccessful. The strength and limitations of this probabilistic approach to the breech presentation are discussed in detail.     

Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE: To compare the neonatal outcome in planned vaginal delivery and planned cesarean section in term singleton pregnancies with breech presentation in a Scandinavian clinic with a high rate of vaginal breech delivery. METHODS: A retrospective study including 1050 term singleton breech pregnancies delivered at a Swedish tertiary referral center during 1988 to 2000. For 699 patients (67%) a vaginal delivery was planned, of whom 603 (86%) were delivered vaginally. In 327 (31%) cases a cesarean section was planned and performed. These two groups were compared regarding rates of acidemia at birth (cord artery pH <7.05), low Apgar scores and neonatal neurological morbidity. Long term sequels among infants with a complicated neonatal course were also identified. RESULTS: Acidemia at birth, Apgar score below 7 at 5 minutes, and referral to neonatal intensive care unit all occurred at higher rates in planned vaginal delivery (5.3%, 3.6%, and 8.9%, respectively), than in planned cesarean delivery (0, 0, and 4.0%). The rate of neonatal neurological morbidity was 24/699 (3.4%) in planned vaginal delivery (18 cases with cerebral symptoms and six cases of brachial plexus palsy) compared to one case (cerebral symptoms) after a planned cesarean. These differences were all statistically significant (p< or =0.002). Of the neurologically affected neonates, two died and four had cerebral palsy (one delivered by planned cesarean section) at follow up. CONCLUSION: Neonatal morbidity may be reduced with planned cesarean delivery in breech presentation, also in a Scandinavian setting.     

Safety of term vaginal breech delivery

Of 247 women who were pregnant of one healthy child in breech presentation at term, 13 (5.3%) were delivered by a primary cesarean section. The other 234 (94.7%) were allowed to attempt vaginal birth. In these women, the only factor to determine the possibility of a vaginal delivery was normal progression of labor during the first stage, without secondary arrest or signs of fetal distress. 109 Women (44.1%) were delivered spontaneously according to Bracht, 87 (35.2%) had an assisted breech delivery, and 38 (15.4%) underwent a secondary cesarean section. There were two perinatal deaths (0.8%). One of them was directly related to the trial of labor. Two children with a birth trauma had an uneventful recovery. The 1 min Apgar score in all breech delivery groups was more often lower than in a control group of children, who were born spontaneously at term in vertex presentation. However, the 5 min Apgar score and the mean umbilical artery pH were within normal limits in all groups. The secondary cesarean section rate was inversely related to vaginal parity of the mother, and directly related to the newborns' birth weight. There was no relation between the secondary cesarean section rate and the type of breech presentation. It is concluded, that a trial of labor in carefully selected patients with a child in breech presentation at term is a safe procedure, that can be successfully completed in almost 80% of cases. In retrospect, low vaginal parity and high birth weight of the newborn have a negative influence on normal progression of labor.     

Elective cesarean delivery for term breech

OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal complications of elective cesarean delivery for breech at term with those after vaginal or emergency cesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of 15441 primiparas who delivered singleton breech at term. Information was obtained from the Danish Medical Birth Register, the Register of Death Causes, and the Denmark Patient Register. RESULTS: Elective cesarean delivery was associated with lower rates of puerperal fever and pelvic infection (relative risk [RR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70, 0.92), hemorrhage and anemia (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84, 0.97), and operations for wound infection (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57, 0.83) than emergency cesarean delivery. There was a higher rate of puerperal fever and pelvic infection (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.11, 1.25) than for vaginal delivery. Thromboembolic disease occurred in 0.1% of women with cesarean delivery, and anal sphincter rupture occurred in 1.7% of women with vaginal delivery. Elective cesarean delivery was not associated with subsequent ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, placental complications, uterine rupture, or adverse neonatal outcome. Women with elective cesarean delivery were more often delivered by elective cesarean in their second pregnancy, compared with women delivered vaginally (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.21, 1.29). Elective cesarean delivery was associated with a lower rate of a subsequent delivery during the study period and a longer mean delivery interval than for vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Elective cesarean delivery for term breech carries a low risk of severe maternal complications.     

Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to evaluate the perinatal mortality and morbidity of deliveries with fetuses presenting by the breech comparing outcomes of two groups according to mode of delivery: vaginal and cesarean section. RESULTS: Of 756 fetuses studied, 271 were delivered vaginally and 485 by cesarean section. In infants weighing > or = 1500 grams, "further corrected" mortality and morbidity rates were low and similar for both delivery routes: one neonatal death (NNM) in each. Among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (< 1500 grams) the "further corrected" mortality rate was higher in the vaginal group: 57.4%, and 18.0% in abdominal deliveries (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1, 95% CI: 3.1 to 12.1). Likewise, rate of depression at five minutes were higher in the vaginal group (p < 0.001). However, the average fetal weight among the vaginal deliveries VLBW (787 grams) was 250 grams less than in the cesarean section group (1040 grams). After adjustment for fetal weight, gestational age, and other prognostic variables the odds ratio for neonatal death was no longer statistically significant (adjusted OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 5.2, p = 0.105). Comparison of planned vaginal delivery with elective cesarean section yielded smaller differences (adjusted OR for neonatal death = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.9, p = 0.525). CONCLUSION: The poor perinatal outcomes of breech delivered infants are due primarily to VLBW, congenital malformations, and premature labor. Although abdominal delivery had a lower NNM rate than vaginal delivery, the difference was not significant after adjustment for confounding factors. The results confirm the findings of a previously analyzed similar series delivered at our institution between 1980 and 1987. They suggest that, with appropriate technique, abdominal delivery is not mandatory in breech presentation.     

The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the success rates and risks in women with a twin pregnancy who attempt a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Cases were identified in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network's Cesarean Registry with a woman with a twin pregnancy who had had at least 1 previous cesarean delivery. RESULTS: During the study period (1999-2002), 412 women fulfilled the study criteria, and 226 women had elective repeat cesarean delivery. Of the 186 women (45.1% of total) who attempted a trial of labor, 120 women were delivered successfully (success rate, 64.5%), and 66 women (35.5%) had a failed trial of labor. Thirty of the failed trials of labor involved a vaginal delivery for twin A and cesarean delivery for twin B. Women who attempted a trial of labor with twins had no increased risk of transfusion, endometritis, intensive care unit admissions, or uterine rupture when compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery. Fetal and neonatal complications were uncommon in either group at>or=34 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: A trial of labor with twins after previous cesarean delivery does not appear to increase maternal morbidity. Perinatal morbidity is uncommon at>or=34 weeks of gestation.     

Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To compare perinatal outcome in groups of planned vaginal breech delivery, elective cesarean section with the fetus in breech presentation, and planned vaginal delivery with the fetus in cephalic presentation in a university hospital with a tradition of managing breech deliveries by the vaginal route. METHODS: A cohort study from a 7-year period 1995-2002, including 590 planned vaginal deliveries with a term (> 37 weeks) singleton fetus in breech presentation, 396 elective cesarean sections with a term singleton fetus in breech presentation, and 590 control women intending vaginal delivery with a singleton term fetus in cephalic presentation. RESULTS: The Apgar scores were lower in the group of planned vaginal breech delivery, but in other outcome measures there were no significant intergroup differences. The overall neonatal morbidity was small (1.2% vs. 0.5% vs. 0.3% in the respective study groups) if compared to a recently published randomized multicenter study. CONCLUSIONS: Selective vaginal breech deliveries may be safely undertaken in units having a tradition of vaginal breech deliveries.