Evaluation of the Eurotransplant Senior Program. The Results of the First Year

On 4 January 1999, the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was implemented within the Eurotransplant kidney allocation scheme. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Kidneys obtained from donors aged over 65 years of age (65+) were allocated to a selected group of nonimmunized 65+ patients undergoing their first transplant. All transplants were performed locally to minimize cold-ischemic time. All transplants performed with kidneys from elderly donors that were allocated via ESP (ESP group) were compared to transplants performed with similar kidneys allocated via the standard renal allocation system (control group). Initial kidney function and 1-year graft outcome were assessed. RESULTS: In 1999, 227 ESP and 102 control transplants were performed. The duration of cold-ischemic time was 12 and 19 h for the ESP and control groups, respectively. No rejection episodes occurred in 60% and 67% of the ESP patients and controls, respectively, while a direct kidney function was observed in 59% of ESP and 49% of control patients. The 1-year graft survival rates, censoring for graft losses due to deaths in patients with functioning grafts, were 86% and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSION: An old-for-old renal allocation algorithm can be successful provided that risk factors, such as cold-ischemic time, are reduced.     

10 Jahre „Eurotransplant Senior Program“

On 1 January 1999 Eurotransplant started the “Eurotransplant Senior Program” (ESP), the first program worldwide for age-matched kidney allocation and transplantation of expanded criteria donors (ECD). By now more than 4.300 kidneys from donors aged ≥65 were transplanted into recipients ≥65, with local or regional allocation according only to blood group compatibility and waiting time. Compared to ongoing dialysis, renal transplantation in the ESP offers longer patient survival and improved quality of life. The article evaluates the results of the ESP and of other studies dealing with renal transplantation of old donor kidneys into aged recipients. Specific aspects like the unexpectedly high acute rejection rate and ways to assess the residual renal function of aged donor kidneys are covered as well as the specific post-transplant risks of aged recipients.     

Prospective Age-Matching in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients—A 5-Year Analysis of the Eurotransplant Senior Program

Renal transplantation faces challenges: the organ shortage resulting in extended waiting times and an aging population resulting in death with a functioning graft. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) allocates kidneys within a narrow geographic area from donors aged ≥65 years to recipients ≥65 years regardless of HLA. This analysis investigates the impact of the ESP on waiting time, graft and patient survival. The ESP group (n = 1406, old to old) was compared to two groups allocated via the Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) with either similar donor age (old to any [O/A], donor age ≥65, n = 446) or recipient age (any to old, [A/O], recipient age 60–64, n = 1687). All patients were transplanted between 1999 and 2004. Since initiation of the ESP (1999), availability of elderly donors doubled and waiting time for ESP patients decreased. Local allocation led to shorter cold ischemia time (11.9 vs. >17.0 h, p < 0.001) and less delayed graft function (DGF, ESP 29.7% vs. O/A 36.2%, p = 0.047) but 5–10% higher rejection rates. Graft and patient survival were not negatively affected by the ESP allocation when compared to the standard allocation. The ESP age matching of elderly donors and recipients is an effective allocation system for organs from elderly donors.     

"Old-for-old" cadaveric renal transplantation: surgical findings, perioperative complications and outcome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical findings and outcome of locally allocated, blood-group-compatible but HLA-unmatched cadaveric kidneys in first renal transplantation of donor/recipient pairs aged 65 years and above (Eurotransplant Senior Program=ESP). METHODS: 26 patients of the study group (donor age 70.4 +/- 3.6/recipient age 67.7 +/- 2.8) were compared to 30 controls aged 60 and above (mean recipient age 62.6 +/- 2.3/mean donor age 43.8 +/- 15.3). For controls kidney allocation included HLA matching. RESULTS: Cold ischemic time (ESP vs. controls 501 vs. 883 min; p<0.05) and mean number of HLA mismatches (4.2 +/- 1.36 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.62; p<0.05) differed significantly. Delayed graft function was lower in the study group (12% vs. 43%; p<0.05), rejection episodes in the ESP group were numerous but did not differ significantly from the controls (46% vs. 30%; p=0.21). More intraoperative complications and a higher incidence of donor organ arteriosclerosis (p<0.05) were seen in the ESP group. Three-year graft survival uncensored and censored for death with functioning graft did not differ, even though mean creatinine and creatinine clearance differed significantly beginning at month three. Three-year patient survival (55% vs. 81%) differed in favour of the control group, even though the difference was not significant due to small number of patients. CONCLUSION: "Old-for-old" kidney transplantation with local allocation yields graft survival rates comparable to HLA-matched young grafts and is a good approach to extend the donor and recipient pool. Careful patient selection is advised.     

The advantage of allocating kidneys from old cadaveric donors to old recipients: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: In January 1999 a new kidney allocation program was launched by the Eurotransplant Foundation, the 'Eurotransplant Senior Program' (ESP). Cadaveric donors above the age of 65 yr are allocated to kidney transplant recipients of the same age group. METHODS: Using a single-center database, 91 patients who underwent first renal transplantation at the age of 65 yr and older in the years 1999-2002 were identified. Fifty-six patients were transplanted through ESP allocation (study group) and 35 patients (control group) via normal Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) procedure. RESULTS: Age, sex and comorbid conditions did not differ by group. The rate of acute rejection episodes, primary non-function, delayed graft function, perioperative mortality did not differ by group. Serum creatinine was significantly lower in the ETKAS group (1.3 vs. 1.9 mg/dL; p=0.015) from six months after the transplantation on. Overall graft survival at six yr was 56% in the ETKAS group and 52% in the ESP group. With 73% in the ETKAS group and 71% in the ESP group, cumulative patient survival according to the Kaplan-Meier estimation was not statistically different at five yr. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a relevant difference in the outcome between young and old kidney transplants in old recipients after this long observation period.     

Donor categories: heart-beating, non-heart-beating and living donors; evolution within the last 10 years in UZ Leuven and Collaborative Donor Hospitals

Over the past 10 years, the University Hospitals Leuven and their group of Collaborative Donor Hospitals (approximately 20) have tried to maximize their contribution to the national and Eurotransplant donor pool. In this time period, 1042 potential donors and 703 effective donors were coordinated and their organs allocated through Eurotransplant. This activity represented approximately 30% of the national donor pool and approximately 32% of the national organ pool. For Belgium, the non-heart-beating donor activity represented 11.38% of all donors in 2006. Since 1997, 167 potential live donors have been screened in our center. Of these, 48 transplants (28.74%) (39 kidneys--9 livers) have been performed. A boost of screened candidates was seen over the last 3 years, with a 500% increase of records being evaluated. Although the Belgian live donation activity remains one of the lowest in the world, there has been a clear increase over the last 3 years with about 10% of all kidney transplant activity originating now from live donors.     

Old-for-Old Kidney Allocation Allows Successful Expansion of the Donor and Recipient Pool

Allocation of kidneys from donors older than 64 years to recipients older than 64 years was started in 1999 to improve use of older donor kidneys. Kidneys are allocated locally without HLA-matching to keep cold ischemia short. We compared survival and rejection rates in elderly patients allocated in the old-for-old program (ESP) to patients aged 60 years and older based on HLA-matching, expected ischemia and waiting time (ETKAS). The 69 ESP patients were older (67.9 +/- 2.5 vs. 63.9 +/- 2.9 years), had older donors (71.2 +/- 3.9 vs. 44.6 +/- 14.5 years) and more HLA-mismatches (4.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.7) than the 71 ETKAS patients, while ischemia was shorter (7.8 +/- 3.4 vs. 14.2 +/- 5.5 h). ESP and ETKAS had similar graft (1-year: 83.6% vs. 86.9%) and patient survival (85.2% vs. 89.5%). With the introduction of ESP, use of older recipients and donors rose from less than 2% to 16% and 11%, respectively. Incidence of acute rejections was significantly higher in the ESP group (1 year: 43.2% vs. 27.4%) and significantly correlated with the degree of HLA-matching. Introduction of old-for-old allocation allows successful expansion of the donor and recipient pool without affecting patient and graft survival. HLA-matching should not be ignored, as the risk of acute rejection in elderly patients is substantial.     

Eurotransplant Senior Program 'old for old': results from 10 patients

More frequently there is the need for renal transplantation of older patients. Against the background of an increasing number of old donors and recipients, Eurotransplant Leiden started the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) 'old for old' in 1999. The ESP works with donors and recipients both over 65 yr. The kidneys are transplanted with short cold ischaemia time regardless of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility. Compatibility of blood groups, negative crossmatch and less than 5% cytotoxic antibodies are required. First experiences from 10 patients at Heinrich Heine University hospital are reported here. The course of 10 transplanted patients is described from January 1999 until November 1999 (28.4+/-15.8 wk). Age of donor and recipient, cause of dialysis and concomitant diseases from recipients, function of the transplanted kidney and complications are analysed. Immunosuppression consisted initially of cyclosporin A, mycophenolic acid and steroids. The results of these 10 patients were compared to 14 patients who were transplanted according to the ordinary Eurotransplant criteria (Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System) in the same period of time. Kidneys from six donors (70.5+/-3.3 yr) were transplanted to 10 different recipients (66.9+/-2.2 yr). The control group consisted of 14 patients (47.6+/-14.4 yr) who received kidneys from 14 donors (48.3+/-10.1 yr). One double kidney transplantation was performed in the senior group, i.e. two kidneys from a marginal donor were transplanted to one recipient ('two in one'). In the ESP group, cold ischaemia time was reduced by 5 h and mean of HLA mismatches was more than doubled. Mean length of hospitalisation of ESP and control groups was 47.2+/-28.2 and 34.2+/-11.6 d, respectively. Intraoperatively, no complications were seen, post-operative care was performed on a normal ward. ESP patients suffered more often from delayed graft function, which led to further need for haemodialysis for 11.2 d. Finally, 9 of 10 patients acquired a satisfactory renal graft function. A total of 13 biopsies were performed in eight cases. Altogether seven acute rejections in 6 patients were found (four interstitial, one vascular, one interstitial+vascular, one clinical). The 9 patients with sufficient renal graft function were discharged with a mean serum creatinine level of 2.3+/-0.5 mg/dL (control: 1.9+/-0.8 mg/dL). Comparing these 10 recipients to a control group consisting of 14 patients, the results are comparable and encouraging. In conclusion, the short-term results of the ESP are promising. Nevertheless, the post-operative care requires more attention due to several complications. Though the HLA compatibility was not considered, all rejections were coped with effectively. Quality of life was improved.     

Renal transplantation in the elderly: surgical complications and outcome with special emphasis on the Eurotransplant Senior Programme.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of the Eurotransplant Senior Programme (ESP) within our centre compared to elderly recipients >or=60 years from the regular Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS), specifically focusing on surgical aspects. METHODS: Data from 73 ESP patients (average donor/recipient age: 71.1/67.1) were compared with those from 51 patients (49.7/63.6) treated within the framework of the ETKAS program between the years 1999 and 2006. The mean follow-up was 39.5 months. RESULTS: Cold ischaemic time (ESP versus ETKAS: 10.3 versus 15.0 h), duration of renal replacement therapy (42.2 versus 76.8 months), donor glomerular filtration rate (81.7 versus 109.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and HLA mismatches (4.1 versus 2.4) were significantly different between the two groups (all P < 0.001). Primary graft function was seen in 74% ESP versus 69% of ETKAS patients (P > 0.05). The rate of surgical complications in the ESP versus ETKAS group was 47% versus 28% (P = 0.031) and the revision rate, 33% versus 24% (P = 0.259). Three-year patient and censored graft survival was 84% versus 92% and 85% versus 88% in the ESP and ETKAS group, respectively (all P > 0.05). Ninety-five percent of all deceased patients died with a functioning graft. CONCLUSIONS: The donor and recipient pool has been markedly expanded through ESP with similar patient and graft survival compared to elderly recipients grafted according to ETKAS criteria. However, patients and their physicians should be aware of the high surgical complication rate in elderly recipients, particularly when receiving elderly donor kidneys. This might seriously influence postoperative patient management but ultimately does not compromise the transplant outcome.     

Renal transplantation with aged donors

Research indicates that aged heart-beating cadaveric donors cause greater risk factors in kidney transplantation. The influence of age on the outcome of non-heart-beating (NHB) cadaveric renal transplantations has not yet been clarified. From July 1986 to May 1999, 63 patients who received cadaveric renal transplantation at Osaka City University Hospital and Osaka City General Hospital were divided into two groups according to their age. Renal function and graft-survival rates of the two groups were compared. The mean values of nadir donor serum creatinine were significantly worse (P < 0.05) in the aged donor group. In the aged donor group the percentage of immediately functioning grafts was lower and the percentage of non-functioning grafts was higher. During the first 10 years post-transplant, graft survival in the aged donor group was significantly lower than that in the younger donor group. We conclude that cadaveric renal transplantation from NHB aged donors can be to the detriment of renal function and graft survival rates compared to transplantation from younger donors.     

Nierenspende und Nierentransplantation im Alter

The likelihood of terminal renal insufficiency escalates with age, increasing the risk of dying as a patient requiring dialysis. In 1999, Eurotransplant initiated the Eurotransplant Senior Programm (ESP), in which the kidneys of old donors (>64 years) are allocated to recipients 64 years and older. Allocation does not take HLA-matching into account and is performed regionally only according to blood-group-compatibility to keep the storage time short. As a consequence of the short ischemic time, and thus reduced non-immunological damage to the anyways susceptible old kidney, graft-function and graft-survival in the ESP are very good. The results of the initial 5 years of this program show that it successfully utilizes more kidneys from old donors and that more old recipients are being transplanted, with a satisfactory graft-function. Increased donor- and/or recipient age require a thorough evaluation to exclude malignant and other diseases. Furthermore, short term controls on the waiting list and following kidney transplantation are prerequisites for successful transplantation in the aged recipient. If this is guaranteed, kidney transplantation in the old recipient-even with old donor organs-is a good alternative to the morbidity of a prolonged dialysis. Nevertheless, the role of HLA-matching should be reconsidered to reduce rejections.     

Long-term patient and graft survival in the eurotransplant senior program: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was launched in 1999, targeted to increase the supply of donor kidneys to the elderly. This program requires local allocation of kidneys from cadaveric donors >65 years to recipients >65 years. METHODS: Of all patients >65 years who received a kidney transplant in 1999-2002 at our center, 59 patients were transplanted through the ESP protocol (ESP group), and 44 patients received a transplant from a younger donor (EuroTransplant Kidney Allocation System, ETKAS group). Recipients were followed for up to 5.3 years using the Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Outcomes studied included all-cause mortality and allograft loss. RESULTS: Age, sex, and comorbid conditions did not differ by group. Donor age was higher (69 vs. 36 years; P < 0.001) and cold ischemia time shorter in the ESP group (10 vs. 15 hr; P < 0.001). Number of HLA mismatches was greater in the ESP group (3.8 vs. 3.0; P = 0.003). ESP patients were more likely to receive induction therapy and less likely to receive cyclosporine A. Primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, operative mortality, rate of acute rejection episodes, and length of stay did not differ by group. Although serum creatinine at discharge was higher in ESP patients (1.7 vs. 1.4 mg/dL; P < 0.001), 4-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.31-1.49) and graft loss (HR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.29-1.28) tended to be less. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patient and graft survival were comparable between elderly patients who received their organ via the ESP and the regular ETKAS algorithm.     

Long-term renal function in kidneys from non-heart-beating donors: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric kidneys from brain-stem-dead donors continue to be limited because the number of donors has reached a plateau. Wide recruitment of non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) could significantly increase the donor pool. NHBD renal transplants are underused because of the concern of poor quality graft function from such donors. In response to this perception, we reviewed 46 NHBD renal transplants performed in our center since 1998. METHODS: All NHBD kidneys were machine-perfused using the Newcastle continuous-hypothermic pulsatile preservation system before transplantation. A control heart-beating-donor (HBD) group was taken as the next consecutive HBD renal transplant to the NHBD transplant. The outcome and quality of function of the groups of renal transplants were analyzed for short-term and long-term performance. RESULTS: The renal transplant patients were matched for donor and recipient factors. Survival rates for allografts and patients were similar for 1 to 3 years. There was an increased incidence of delayed graft function in the NHBD renal transplants in the perioperative period. The creatinine clearance was 22.8+/-2.3 mL/minute for NHBD patients and 44.4+/-2.9 mL/minute for HBD patients at the time of discharge from hospital. This difference equalized after 3 months and the creatinine clearance for NHBD was 44.2+/-2.4 mL/minute and for HBD 49.2+/-3.4 mL/minute. CONCLUSIONS: Our results for NHBD renal transplants confirm that such grafts suffer primary warm ischemic injury, shown by the increased incidence of acute tubular necrosis and consequent delayed graft function. This produced poor renal function at the time of hospital discharge. After 3 months, the renal function of NHBD cases improved to the level seen in HBD patients.     

Non-heart-beating donor kidneys in the Netherlands: allocation and outcome of transplantation

BACKGROUND: Since February 1, 2001, kidneys from both heart-beating (HB) and non-heart-beating (NHB) donors in The Netherlands have been indiscriminately allocated through the standard renal-allocation system. METHODS: Renal function and allograft-survival rate for kidneys from NHB and HB donors were compared at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: The outcomes of 276 renal transplants, 176 from HB donors and 100 from NHB III donors, allocated through the standard renal allocation system, Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System, and performed between February 1, 2001 and March 1, 2002 were compared. Three months after transplantation, graft survival was 93.7% for HB kidneys and 85.0% for NHB kidneys (P<0.05). At 12 months, graft survival was 92.0% and 83.0%, respectively (P<0.03). Serum creatinine levels in the two groups were comparable at both 3 and 12 months. Multivariate analysis identified previous kidney transplantation (relative risk [RR] 3.33; P<0.005), donor creatinine (RR 1.01; P<0.005), and NHB (RR 2.38; P<0.05) as independent risk factors for transplant failure within 12 months. In multivariate analysis of NHB data, a warm ischemia time (WIT) of 30 minutes or longer (P<0.005; RR 6.16, 95% confidence interval 2.11-18.00) was associated with early graft failure. No difference in 12-month graft survival was seen between HB and NHB kidneys after excluding the kidneys that failed in the first 3 months. CONCLUSION: Early graft failure was significantly more likely in recipients of kidneys from NHB donors. A prolonged WIT was strongly associated with this failure. Standard allocation procedures do not have a negative effect on outcome, and there is no reason to allocate NHB kidneys differently from HB kidneys.     

Diabetic donors as a source of non-heart-beating renal transplants

Due to the organ shortage, many renal transplantation centers attempt to increase the donor pool by using non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs). These kidneys are generally regarded as "marginal" grafts. Many centers do not consider transplantation from an NHBD with a history of diabetes as it is a more suboptimal donor. We began our NHBD program in 1998 and have performed 5 renal transplants from diabetic NHBDs. Viability testing identified kidneys suitable for single or dual transplantation. Although kidneys from brain stem dead donors with diabetes have been used successfully, our data suggested that kidneys from diabetic NHBDs can also be used although we still need long-term results.     

Underutilization of pancreas donors

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of the pancreas has become the treatment of choice for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. With the current shortage of cadaver donors and the increasing number of diabetic patients on the transplant waiting list, there is a critical need to optimally use all available pancreas grafts for transplantation. We have therefore explored the use of traditionally "less-than-ideal" pancreas donors, including pediatric (4-10 years), older (>or=45 years), obese (weight >or=200 lb), and non-heart-beating donors and donors with an elevated amylase (75% greater than normal values). METHODS: A total of 620 primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations were performed at our center. We analyzed the ratio of livers to pancreata transplanted at our center and compared this to the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we then assessed the impact of these less-than-ideal donors on patient survival, graft survival, and postsurgical complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. RESULTS: A substantial nationwide underutilization of pancreata from donor procurements is demonstrated in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. By using these less-than-ideal donors, the ratio of liver to pancreata procured can be reduced to 1.25:1. Graft survival was not significantly different in patients receiving transplants from obese, non-heart-beating, pediatric, or hyperamylasemic donors compared with grafts from ideal donors. However, grafts from donors 45 years of age or older had significantly lower 1- and 5-year graft survival rates (76% and 65% vs. 90% and 80%, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that utilization of pancreas grafts from selected, less-than-ideal donors results in good overall outcomes and could potentially expand the organ donor pool.     

Optimizing outcomes by preconditioning the donor

The criteria that define a so-called “marginal donor” kidney have been standardized since 2002. However, every transplant center must establish its own guidelines on organ acceptability. An expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney is age at least 60 years, or 50 to 59 years with at least two of three specified comorbidities. Cadaveric kidneys have shown worse functional and survival outcomes compared with those from living donors. Thus, all efforts should be made to minimize the effects of ischemia on standard, non-heart-beating or ECD cadaveric donor kidneys. Because of an increasing shortfall between the diminishing number of deceased donor organs available and the increasing waiting lists, an increasing number of living donor transplantations are being performed in Europe. Among deceased donor kidneys, the largest percentage corresponds to ECD—aged or comorbidity donors—and donors after cardiac death. The results of transplants with kidneys from donors over 65 years are 10% to 15% lower than those from younger donors. Older donors present more comorbidities; however, acceptable results may be obtained with careful selection and shortened cold ischemic times. If the transplant center uses these donors to expand the pool of available organs, the donor must be evaluated according to age, vascular condition, renal function, and comorbidity. If the donor is accepted, suitable questions are: Has the potential donor undergone maneuvers to improve the quality of the kidneys? Which kind of approaches should we perform? Should we only use the biopsy information for a decision?     

Outcomes of Pancreas Transplantation in the United States Using Cardiac-Death Donors

Organs donated after cardiac death (DCD) are used to expand the donor pool. We analyzed the outcomes in the United States of pancreatic transplantation of organs from DCD donors performed between 1993 and 2003.
We used the OPTN/UNOS Registry to compare outcomes of primary pancreas allografts from DCD donors and donors after brain death (DBD). The primary endpoints were graft failure and patient death. A national survey regarding the use of DCD donors in pancreas transplantation was conducted among the directors of pancreas transplant centers.
Data were obtained on 47 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK) and 10 solitary pancreas transplants from DCD donors and on 2431 SPK and 1607 solitary pancreas transplants from DBD donors. Recipients of a SPK transplants from DCD and DBD donors had equivalent patient and graft survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years. For recipients of SPK transplants, the wait for organs from DCD donors was significantly shorter than that for organs from DBD donors. SPK recipients of organs from DCD donors had longer hospital stays than did recipients of organs from DBD donors. With renal allografts, the incidence of delayed graft function was almost four times higher with organs from DCD donors than with organs from DBD donors.
Selective use of organs from DCD donors is safe for pancreas transplantation.     

Renal transplantations performed using non-heart-beating organ donors: going back to the future?

BACKGROUND: As more expanded-criteria organ donors are used to bridge the widening gap between organ supply and demand, non-heart-beating (NHB) donors will become increasingly important. The purpose of this study was to analyze renal transplant outcomes using this source of cadaveric (CAD) organs and compare the results with heart-beating organ sources. METHODS: Data from 98,698 adult CAD renal transplant recipients and 34,531 living donor renal transplant recipients registered in the U. S. Renal Data System database between January 1993 and June 2000 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare graft and patient survival rates between NHB, CAD, and living donor transplant recipients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for NHB donor recipients, while adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Recipients of NHB donor organs experienced nearly twice the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) compared with heart-beating donors (42.4% vs. 23.3%, respectively). NHB donor transplants experienced comparable allograft survival when compared with CAD transplants at 6 years (73.2% vs. 72.5%, respectively; P=NS); patient survival was greater at 6 years for NHB compared with CAD renal transplant recipients (80.9% vs. 77.8%, respectively; P=NS). Significant factors for allograft loss for NHB donor organ recipients included the following: organ used for repeat transplants; DGF; donor age older than 35 years; and head trauma as a cause of initial injury (relative risk 2.74, 1.90, 1.78, and 1.41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although exhibiting elevated DGF rates, allograft and patient survival rates of transplants from NHB donor sources are equivalent to those from conventional CAD sources. Donor age, recipient transplant number, female recipient, mechanism of injury, and DGF were the most pertinent variables leading to poor outcomes.     

Outcome of renal transplants from pediatric donors <5 yr of age

AIM: Outcomes of single renal transplants from donors <5 yr old have traditionally been inferior to those from older donors. We retrospectively studied our experience with patients who received renal transplants, either individually or en bloc, from young donors (<5 yr of age) to determine the utility of these organs. We also compared the outcomes of these transplant patients maintained on either cyclosporine- (CyA) or tacrolimus-based (TRL) immunosuppression regimens. PATIENTS: Ninety-eight patients received transplants at our center from donors <5 yr of age between August 1993 and August 2003. They were followed-up from 12 months to 11 yr. Patients were divided into four groups based on whether they received single or en bloc transplants, and whether CyA or TRL was the base immunosuppressive agent. Patients in group I (n = 13) received single pediatric kidneys and were treated with CyA regimens; group II patients (n = 26) also received single pediatric kidneys, but were treated with TRL regimens; group III patients (n = 31) were transplanted en bloc and were treated with CyA; and group IV patients (n = 28) received en bloc transplants and were treated with TRL. RESULTS: One-year patient and death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between recipients of en bloc vs. single grafts (i.e. 88 and 85% vs. 90 and 87%, respectively), or between the four treatment groups (group I: 85 and 85%, group II: 92 and 88%, group III: 87 and 84%, and group IV: 89 and 86%, respectively). The overall 1-yr rejection rate was 30% (29 of 98), which was significantly higher in the CyA-treated patients 19 of 44; i.e. 43%, than in TRL-treated patients 10 of 54, i.e. 19%, p = 0.03). In the en bloc recipients, seven grafts (12%) were lost as a result of vascular thrombosis. Notably, none of the single kidneys were lost because of vascular thrombosis. At the end of follow-up the creatinine levels of both groups were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric donor kidneys transplanted individually provide for equal patient and graft survival when compared with en bloc transplants. TRL can be used reduce the detrimental effect of acute rejection on graft growth and function when compared with CyA. Single use of such kidneys can safely and efficaciously be transplanted into adult recipients, greatly expanding the donor pool.