Acute administration of diazepam and buspirone in rats trained on conflict schedules having different degrees of predictability

The anti-conflict activities of diazepam and buspirone were examined on three schedules designed to condition the suppression of licking. The schedules differed in the degree to which they predicted (signalled) the presentation of a conflict inducing electric shock. The first study investigated the effects of three doses of diazepam (0.5, 2, and 5 mg/kg IP) on a predictable, a moderately predictable, and an unpredictable schedule of shock presentation. Diazepam induced a significant increase from baseline in licking during the shock component on all three schedules. These anticonflict effects were the most consistent on the predictable schedule, and least consistent on the unpredictable schedule. A second experiment investigated the anticonflict activity of three doses of buspirone (0.125, 0.25, and 0.625 mg/kg SC) on each of these three schedules. The predictable and moderately predictable schedules failed to detect anticonflict activity at any dose of buspirone. However, the lowest dose (0.125 mg/kg) of buspirone increased shocked licking and the highest dose (0.625 mg/kg) decreased shock component licking on the unpredictable schedule. Thus the unpredictable schedule was sensitive to both anticonflict (anxiolytic) and proconflict (anxiogenic) effects of buspirone.     

The effects of acute administration of gepirone in rats trained on conflict schedules having different degrees of predictability

The anticonflict activity of gepirone, a putative anxiolytic and antidepressant, was examined on three schedules which conditioned the suppression of licking. The novel schedules differed in the degree to which they predicted (signalled) the presentation of a conflict-inducing electric shock. Three doses of gepirone (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg SC) were evaluated on a predictable, a moderately predictable, and an unpredictable schedule of shock presentation. Gepirone induced a nondose-dependent increase from baseline in punished licking on the predictable schedule on the last two days of a five-day test period. The lowest dose (1.25 mg/kg) of gepirone induced a significant increase in punished licking on the moderately predictable schedule on the last two days of testing. The highest dose (5 mg/kg) induced initial decreases in overall responding on this schedule. However, responding returned to baseline over the course of the four days of testing. When administered to rats trained on an unpredictable schedule of shock presentation, all doses of gepirone induced an initial decrease from baseline. The lowest dose group returned to baseline control response levels over the next four days, whereas the suppressive effects of the higher doses persisted. The initial decrease in responding observed on all schedules may be due to the effects of gepirone on motor functioning. However, the 2.5-mg/kg dose induced a proconflict or anxiogenic effect on the last test day (decreased punished responding alone) on the unpredictable schedule, while inducing an anticonflict effect on the predictable one. The unpredictable schedule is sensitive to detecting decreases as well as increases in punished responding and as such may be a unique conflict model for evaluating novel anxiolytics. The results indicate that the pharmacological effects of gepirone vary depending on the schedule of shock presentation as well as the dose and frequency of administration.     

Measures of anxiety, retention and stress in the rat following treatment with the diterpene sclareol glycol

In a punished drinking test in rats sclareol glycol (SG) decreased the number of punished responses ("proconflict response") while diazepam had the opposite effect; SG antagonized the "anticonflict response" of diazepam. Post-training administration of SG in rats enhanced retention in active avoidance task evaluated 24 h later. SG produced an increase in plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels in unstressed rats. The stress-induced increase in ACTH and corticosterone secretion was potentiated by SG. All these data suggest that SG behaves as an anxiogenic, memory-facilitator and perhaps adaptogenic agent. The effects of SG may be mediated by different mechanisms of action (stimulation of adenylate cyclase, interaction with GABA-ergic and dopaminergic transmitter mechanisms).     

Pharmacological analysis of the effects of benzodiazepines on punished schedule-induced polydipsia in rats

Food-deprived Wistar rats were exposed to a fixed-time 60-s food delivery schedule until they developed schedule-induced polydipsia. Every fifth lick was then followed by an electric shock during two, signalled, 5-min periods, which ran concurrently with the food delivery schedule. Shock intensities were adjusted to reduce licking to 60-70% of the unpunished licking rates. The benzodiazepine full agonists, diazepam (0.3-3.0 mg/kg), chlordiazepoxide (0.3-10.0 mg/kg), oxazepam (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) and the benzodiazepine partial agonist, RU-32698 (3.0-17.0 mg/kg), led to increases in punished responding at intermediate doses and decreases at the highest doses tested. All benzodiazepine agonists brought about dose-dependent decreases in unpunished schedule-induced polydipsia, with doses required to reduce drinking proving higher than doses required to increase punished schedule-induced polydipsia. The antipunishment effect of 0.3 mg/kg of diazepam was dose-dependently antagonized by flumazenil and the benzodiazepine inverse agonist, RU-34000. Flumazenil effects, however, could reflect actions of flumazenil as a partial inverse agonist at GABAA receptors. RU-32698 at 10.0 mg/kg further facilitated the rate-increasing effect of 0.3 mg/kg of diazepam, but at 17.0 mg/kg partially blocked such antipunishment effect. Overall, the present results extend the similarities of the effects of benzodiazepine compounds on adjunctive and operant patterns of behaviour by showing similar interactions within the benzodiazepine receptor complex.     

Anticonflict action of tandospirone in a modified Geller-Seifter conflict test in rats.

Tandospirone is a novel non-benzodiazepine compound possessing potent anxiolytic properties in a water lick conflict paradigm in rats and a high affinity for central 5-HT1A receptors. In the present study, tandospirone was evaluated for anxiolytic activity in a modified Geller-Seifter conflict paradigm in rats. Tandospirone produced significant increases in the punished responding at doses of 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg, i.p. or 20 mg/kg, p.o., although it decreased unpunished responding at doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg, i.p. or 20 mg/kg, p.o. Likewise, diazepam was also effective after i.p.-administration in this test, and its minimum effective dose was slightly higher than that of tandospirone. This suggests that tandospirone might be as effective in the treatment of anxiety as diazepam. The anticonflict action of tandospirone was not inhibited by Ro-15-1788, a benzodiazepine antagonist, although that of diazepam was completely inhibited. 8-OH-DPAT, a full agonist of 5-HT1A receptors, was also effective in this test with a high potency. Therefore, the possibility exists that the anticonflict action of tandospirone is related to its agonist action on 5-HT1A receptors, not on benzodiazepine receptors.     

Antagonism of diazepam's anticonflict effects in rats by nicotine,but not by arecoline

The purpose of the present study was to determine the possible role of cholinergic mechanisms in the anticonflict effects of the anxiolytic diazepam. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were tested with a modified Geller-Seifter procedure using a multiple reinforcement schedule in which unpunished responding in one component was reinforced according to a fixed-interval 60-sec schedule, and punished responding in the other component resulted in both food and a brief electric shock presentation according to a fixed-ratio 1 schedule. In Experiment 1 (?)-nicotine antagonized the increase in punished responding that was produced by diazepam. In Experiment 2 diazepam produced selective increases in punished responding that again was antagonized by (?)-nicotine, a nicotinic cholinergic agonist, whereas arecoline, a muscarinic cholinergic agonist, did not antagonize diazepam's increase in punished responding. Neither drug produced any significant changes in unpunished responding. In Experiment 3 it was shown that the centrally acting nicotinic antagonist, mecamylamine, was able to block nicotine's antagonism of diazepam. These results suggest that there is an interaction between central nicotinic cholinergic mechanisms and diazepam's anticonflict effects in this animal model for anxiolytics, and support clinical observations that smoking can reduce some effects of benzodiazepines. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Effects of melatonin and agomelatine in anxiety-related procedures in rats: interaction with diazepam.

The anxiolytic potential of melatonin and agomelatine, a potent MT(1/2) receptor agonist, and their combined effects with diazepam, were investigated in rats using the punished drinking test, the safety signal withdrawal operant paradigm, the elevated-plus-maze and hypophagia-induced novelty. In the punished drinking test, evening injections of melatonin (80 mg/kg, IP, but not 20 and 40 mg/kg) and agomelatine (40 mg/kg, IP) increased the number of foot shocks received. However, neither melatonin (40-80 mg/kg) nor agomelatine (20-40 mg/kg) released response suppression during the period associated with the safety signal withdrawal and affected rats' behaviour in the elevated-plus-maze. Furthermore, agomelatine (40 mg/kg) did not enhance food consumption in unfamiliar environment. However, the co-administration of melatonin (80 mg/kg) or agomelatine (20-40 mg/kg) with diazepam, at a dose (0.25 mg/kg) inactive on its own, induced an anxiolytic-like effect in the punished drinking test and the elevated plus-maze. These results indicate that, although mostly devoid of anxiolytic-like action per se, melatonin and agomelatine can potentiate the anxiolytic effects of diazepam.     

Naloxone blocks the effect of diazepam and meprobamate on conflict behaviour in rats

The effect of naloxone on the anticonflict action of diazepam was studied in a model involving foot shock-induced suppression of food-rewarded operant behaviour. Both 1 and 10 mg/kg naloxone SC abolished the increase in punished responding produced by diazepam and chlordiazepoxide. Naloxone also blocked the anticonflict effect of meprobamate. These observations are discussed in terms of a possible involvement of endogenous opioid peptides in the anxiolytic effects of tranquillizers.     

Lack of central 5-hydroxytryptamine influence on the anticonflict activity of diazepam

This study examined the effects of various drug treatments (IP injections) proposed to modify central 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) activity on a conditioned suppression of drinking behavior in water-deprived rats. The subjects were trained to drink their daily water requirement during a 10-min session. Intermittent tone periods of 7 s were then introduced, the last 5 s of which the drinking tube was electrified. The animals gradually suppressed tube contacts during the tone to a low constant level within 2 weeks of training. Diazepam increased punished responding dramatically. The 5-HT antagonists methysergide (1–18 mg/kg), cyproheptadine (1–18 mg/kg), metergoline (0,25–2.0 mg/kg) and cinanserin (10–100 mg/kg) failed to induce large, reliable increases in punished responding. When a low dose of diazepam was combined with 5-HT antagonists, only one treatment, methysergide at 3 mg/kg, potentiated the anticonflict activity of diazepam. Acute or chronic treatment with PCPA increased behavior suppressed by punishment, but this effect was weak, brief, and poorly related to the depletion of brain 5-HT. LSD (0.3–100 g/kg) administered 1,10, or 30 min before the test was ineffective in overcoming suppression by punishment. Mescaline (6–30 mg/kg) had no significant effect on punished responding. 5-HTP (18 mg/kg) decreased the number of shocks accepted, but not after pretreating with carbidopa. Pretreatment with carbidopa plus 5-HTP potentiated the anticonflict effect of diazepam. The 5-HT agonist mCPP (0.25–2.0 mg/kg) enhanced suppression due to punishment, but only in doses that interfered with unpunished responding. The 5-HT-releasing agent fenfluramine (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) did not affect this behavior. Amitriptyline pretreatment in a dose not affecting unpunished behavior (5.6 mg/kg) potentiated the diazepam-induced increase in punished responding. These results are difficult to reconcile with the proposal that suppression of behavior consequent to punishment is related to brain 5-HT activity.     

Effects of benzodiazepine agonists on punished responding in pigeons and their relationship with clinical doses in humans

 Anxiolytic drugs generally produce anticonflict effects in both pigeons and rats, although relatively few anxiolytics have been examined in the pigeon and the procedure has not been as completely validated as the rat model. In this study, we examined the antipunishment effects of a variety of benzodiazepine agonists in pigeons and compared the relationship between their potencies to engender anxiolytic-like effects and their clinical doses in humans. In pigeons whose responding was maintained under a multiple FR30^food:FR30^food+shock schedule, the benzodiazepine agonists diazepam, flunitrazepam, alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, lorazepam, flurazepam, bromazepam, medazepam, and clorazepate produced dose-related increases in punished responding, and, with the exception of medazepam, decreased unpunished responding at higher doses. Potencies calculated from the percentage of pigeons showing significant increases in punished responding ranged from 0.081 to 11 mg/kg, and these potencies were invariably lower than those for decreases in unpunished responding by factors ranging from 2.2 to more than 14. The comparison of relative potencies of benzodiazepine receptor agonists in pigeons and humans revealed a high positive correlation (0.90, P<0.005), thus demonstrating the predictive validity of this preclinical animal model for anxiolytic benzodiazepines. The results agree with previous findings of robust anticonflict effects of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and extend further the pharmacological characterization to compounds that have not been examined previously in pigeons. Received: 22 May 1998 / Final version: 4 August 1998     

Benzodiazepine effects upon Geller-Seifter conflict test in rats: analysis of individual variability

The aim of the present study was to investigate in a large group of "drug sophisticated" animals the effect of several doses of oxazepam upon conflict behavior. To this end 43 rats, trained according to the original Geller-Seifter paradigm, were tested with 5 doses (6.25, 12.5, 20.9, 25, and 50 mg/kg IP) of oxazepam. In addition the influence of prior drug experience on the effects of benzodiazepines on punished and unpunished responding was investigated comparing data from the same animals relative to a single oxazepam treatment before and after "drug sophistication." It was found that: (1) after "drug sophistication" oxazepam effect upon the unpunished schedule is decreased, while the disinhibitory action upon punished behavior is increased, unchanged or even decreased; (2) sedative and anticonflict activities of the drug cannot be explained in terms of rate dependency and are independently assessable since, even when unpunished responding is lowered by high doses, the anxiolytic effect is masked in only 27% of the cases; (3) about 20% of the animals appear to be insensitive to the anticonflict effect of oxazepam; (4) the responsiveness to the anxiolytic effect of the drug is related to the shock intensities given during training and to the animal variability under control conditions.     

Antipunishment effects of diazepam on two levels of suppression of schedule-induced drinking in rats

Food-deprived Wistar rats were exposed to a fixed-time (FT) 60-s food delivery schedule until they developed schedule-induced drinking. Rats were matched in pairs according to their licking rates and were designated master or yoked at random. Every fifth lick by master rats was followed by an electric shock during two signalled 5-min periods, which ran concurrently with the food delivery schedule. For the master rats, shock intensities were adjusted to reduce licking to 5-30% (low suppression) or 50-75% (high suppression) of the unpunished licking rates. Yoked rats received the same shocks as master rats, but independently of their own licking. The drinking by yoked animals was not decreased by the presentation of these lick-independent shocks. Diazepam (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) was studied for its effects on punished and nonpunished schedule-induced drinking. Intermediate doses of the drug increased the punished behavior of master rats, but only when schedule-induced drinking was highly suppressed. Diazepam dose dependently decreased licking rates in all other conditions. The antipunishment effects of benzodiazepines may depend on the level of suppression of schedule-induced drinking, and this is in keeping with the results of other experimental preparations where behavior was under aversive control.     

The actions of diazepam and serotonergic anxiolytics vary according to the gender and the estrous cycle phase

The anxiolytic effect of diazepam (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg), buspirone (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg), indorenate (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) and ipsapirone (5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg) was evaluated in male and female rats during the proestrus and metestrus phases. The burying behavior test was used to measure the anxiety levels. In this test, increases in the behavior latency are interpreted as prolonged reactivity, while reductions in the burying behavior are considered to reflect anxiolytic states. Diazepam increases in burying behavior latency were consistently higher than those observed after serotonergic anxiolytics. Buspirone, at no dose tested, affected the burying behavior latency, while indorenate and ipsapirone had only minor effects. Male individuals were more sensitive than females to the actions of diazepam on burying behavior. The serotonergic anxiolytics produce similar responses in both sexes. Metestrus females were much less sensitive to the action of all anxiolytics on burying behavior latency than proestrus females. Proestrus females were highly sensitive to the actions of diazepam on burying latency as compared both with males and metestrus females. Data show that a larger gender and within females variation occurs after treatment with diazepam as compared with the serotonergic anxiolytics. The results are discussed considering the relationships between ovarian hormones and the GABA-benzodiazepinic and serotonergic systems.     

The effects of diazepam on brain 5-HT and 5-HIAA in stressed and unstressed rats

Diazepam, administered to rats at a high dose (25 mg/kg PO) has been shown to have no effect on the plasma corticosterone response to the stress of an elevated open platform. It did however, reduce the plasma corticosterone in rats repeatedly exposed to the apparatus. Diazepam-withdrawal from stress-habituated rats increased plasma corticosterone (p less than 0.01) whereas withdrawal of diazepam from unstressed rats had no effect on plasma corticosterone. It is concluded that this effect of diazepam-withdrawal may reflect the development of dependence upon the drug. Significant effects were not observed following the administration of a lower non-selective dose (5 mg/kg PO) of diazepam and, therefore, it is not clear whether dependence to its sedative, rather than the anxiolytic properties have been measured. Acute diazepam (25 mg/kg) increased (p less than 0.05) hippocampal 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid; its withdrawal from unstressed rats after 40 days reduced (p less than 0.01) hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine. There was no evidence that the effects of diazepam or its withdrawal on plasma corticosterone in stressed rats were associated directly with changes in brain 5-hydroxyindoles.     

The effects of compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three rat models of anxiety

Compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists have recently been reported to produce benzodiazepine-like antianxiety effects in mice. To assess the cross-species generality of these findings, the present experiments compared the effects of diazepam (0.625-5 mg/kg) with those of several non-selective (MM-77, 0.03-1 mg/kg and pindobind-5-HT(1A), 0.1-5 mg/kg) and selective (WAY100635, 0.01-10 mg/kg, p-MPPI, 0.01-3 mg/kg and SL88.0338, 0.3-10 mg/kg) 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three well-validated anxiolytic screening tests in rats: punished lever-pressing, punished drinking, and the elevated plus-maze. In the punished lever-pressing conflict test, none of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists modified rates of punished responding, whereas in the punished drinking test, WAY100635 (0.3-1 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (3-10 mg/kg), p-MPPI (1 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg), but not pindobind-5-HT(1A), produced clear anticonflict activity. However, the increase in punished responding with the 5-HT(1A) compounds was smaller than that produced by diazepam, indicating weaker anxiolytic-like activity. In the elevated plus-maze test, WAY100635 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (0.3-10 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.01-3 mg/kg), pindobind-5-HT(1A) (0.1-3 mg/kg), but not p-MPPI, showed anxiolytic-like activity on traditional behavioral indices, increasing the percentage of time spent in open arms and the percentage of open arm entries. As was the case in the punished drinking test, the magnitude of the positive effects of the 5-HT(1A) compounds was generally smaller than that of diazepam. Of the ethological measures recorded in the plus-maze, all compounds markedly decreased risk assessment (i.e. attempts) over the entire dose-range, but only diazepam clearly increased directed exploration (i.e. head-dipping). Although the present results demonstrate that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists elicit anxiolytic-like effects in rats, this action appears to be test-specific and, unlike previous findings in mice, smaller than that observed with benzodiazepines. The data are discussed in relation to the possible relevance of species differences in 5-HT(1A) receptor function and the nature of the anxiety response studied.     

beta-Carboline and pentylenetetrazol effects on conflict behavior in the rat.

The beta-carbolines and the convulsant agent pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) have been reported as "anxiogenic" in several animal models for anxiety. The present study examined the effects of the beta-carboline noreleagnine (NOR) and PTZ, administered alone and in combination with the benzodiazepine antagonist, Ro 15-1788, on behavior in the conditioned suppression of drinking (CSD) conflict procedure. In daily 10-min sessions, water-deprived female SD rats were trained to drink from a tube that was electrified (0.25 mA). Electrification was signaled by a tone. Acute (20-min) treatment with NOR or PTZ resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in both punished responding (shocks received) and unpunished responding (water intake). Both NOR and PTZ decreased punished responding only at doses that also depressed unpunished responding. Coadministration of Ro 15-1788 (2 mg/kg) reduced the effects of NOR on punished, but not unpunished, responding; this Ro 15-1788 cotreatment reduced the effects of PTZ on both punished and unpunished responding. These data suggest that both PTZ and NOR produce benzodiazepine receptor-mediated anxiogenic-like effects on conflict behavior.     

Anxiolytic-like effects of alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonists on conflict behavior in the rat: pre- versus postsynaptic receptor mechanisms.

The effects of acute pretest administration and chronic posttest administration of clonidine or the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist UK-14,304 on conflict behavior were investigated. In daily 10-min sessions, water-deprived rats were trained to drink water from a tube that was occasionally electrified (0.25 mA); electrification was signaled by a tone. Prior to treatment, subjects accepted 25-30 shocks/session (punished responding) and consumed approximately 12-15 ml/session (unpunished responding). Acute pretest administration of clonidine or UK-14,304 did not increase punished responding. In contrast, chronic posttest clonidine administration (40 micrograms/kg, IP, twice daily for 8 weeks) resulted in a robust and time-dependent increase in punished responding (60-70 shocks/session) relative to saline-treated controls. Moreover, the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist UK-14,304 also increased punished responding when administered chronically (1.0 mg/kg, BID). Administration of the noradrenergic neurotoxin N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine HCl (DSP4, 65 mg/kg, IP) significantly decreased punished responding in control conditioned suppression of drinking sessions. The anticonflict effect associated with chronic posttest clonidine treatment was not altered by DSP4 pretreatment. These findings suggest that chronic posttest alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist treatment produces an anticonflict effect independent of its actions at presynaptic alpha 2-adrenoceptors.     

Interactions of metergoline with diazepam,quipazine, and hallucinogenic drugs on a conflict behavior in the rat

The effects of diazepam quipazine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) were examined on a conditioned suppression paradigm. Food-deprived rats were trained to drink a liquid diet from a tube. Subsequently, intermittent 7-s tones were presented during the daily 10-min sessions, the tube being electrified during the last 5 s of each tone. The subject gradually learned to suppress contact with the tube during the tone periods to a low stable level (punished responding) and consumed stable volumes of the liquid diet during the silent periods (unpunished responding). Treatment with diazepam caused large increases (1,000% of control) in punished responding. The hallucinogens produced only modest increases (200–300%), while quipazine did not significantly increase punished responding. Metergoline pretreatment (0.1–2.0 mg/kg, 180 min) had no effect on punished responding itself, and there was no significant alteration of the diazepam dose-response pattern. The weak increase in punished responding by LSD was antagonized by metergoline, but the interaction between metergoline and DOM was variable and inconsistent. Diazepam, quipazine, LSD, and DOM caused dose-dependent decreases in unpunished responding (fluid intake). Metergoline alone decreased unpunished responding only at 2.0 mg/kg. Metergoline pretreatment (1.0 mg/kg) only slightly antagonized the LSD effect on unpunished behavior, but shifted the dose-response curves of DOM and quipazine for decrease in fluid intake to the right approximately eight fold. On the contrary, the dose-response curve of diazepam to decrease fluid intake was shifted to the left by metergoline pretreatment. These data suggest that altered activity of brain serotonin (5-HT) neurons is not responsible for the dramatic increase in punished responding by diazepam. The hallucinogens, quipazine, and diazepam all produce a decrease in unpunished responding, but they appear to do so by different neuropharmacological mechanisms. In addition, there may be at least slight differences in the mechanism by which LSD produces its effects as compared with that of quipazine and DOM.     

咪唑克生增强丁螺环酮的抗冲突作用

目的　探索α2 受体拮抗剂咪唑克生能否增强 5 HT1A受体激动剂丁螺环酮的抗冲突作用。方法　采用焦虑动物模型Vogel冲突饮水实验。 结果　低于有效剂量的咪唑克生 (0 1～ 1 0mg·kg-1)当与低于有效剂量的丁螺环酮 (0 3mg·kg-1)合用后 ,以剂量依赖性的方式 ,明显增加丁螺环酮的冲突饮水次数 ,当与有效剂量的丁螺环酮 (1 0mg·kg-1)合用后 ,抗冲突饮水次数的改变率从单用时的 +10 9%增至合用时的 +140 %～ +5 85 %。同时 ,合用后对大鼠自发性饮水没有影响。结论　咪唑克生能增强丁螺环酮的抗冲突作用 ,提示去甲肾上腺能和 5 羟色胺能系统之间可能存在交互作用 ,共同调节冲突行为。     

Effects of d-amphetamine and of diazepam on non-punished and punished schedule-induced drinking in rats

Drinking induced in food-deprived rats by a Fixed-Time 1min schedule of food presentation was measured by the amount of water consumed per session and the number of licks per inter-food interval. Subsequently each lick initiated a 10-sec signalled delay in the delivery of food, which led to a decrease in drinking (punishment). With three rats the effects of d-amphetamine (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0mg/kg) were assessed on non-punished and then on punished drinking. With another three rats, the effects of diazepam (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0mg/kg) were assessed. The smaller doses of d-amphetamine had no consistent effect on overall measures of non-punished schedule-induced drinking, but the largest dose decreased them. With the signalled delay d-amphetamine increased punished schedule-induced drinking. Non-punished drinking was increased by small doses of diazepam and decreased by the largest dose, but no dose of diazepam affected punished drinking.