Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting

Background  Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that enables the clinician to perform direct microscopic examination of diagnostic features, not seen by the naked eye, in pigmented skin lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy has previously been assessed in meta-analyses including studies performed in experimental and clinical settings.
Objectives  To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma compared with naked eye examination by performing a meta-analysis exclusively on studies performed in a clinical setting.
Methods  We searched for publications from 1987 to January 2008 and found nine eligible studies. The selected studies compare diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy with naked eye examination using a valid reference test on consecutive patients with a defined clinical presentation, performed in a clinical setting. Hierarchical summary receiver operator curve analysis was used to estimate the relative diagnostic accuracy for clinical examination with, and without, the use of dermoscopy.
Results  We found the relative diagnostic odds ratio for melanoma, for dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination, to be 15·6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·9–83·7, P  = 0·016]; removal of two outlier studies changed this to 9·0 (95% CI 1·5–54·6, P  = 0·03).
Conclusions  Dermoscopy is more accurate than naked eye examination for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in suspicious skin lesions when performed in the clinical setting.     

The impact of dermoscopy on the management of pigmented lesions in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists: a prospective study

Background Dermoscopy greatly improves the clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions. Few studies have investigated, however, how dermoscopy is guiding management decisions in everyday clinical practice. In addition, most studies have been performed in the setting of dermoscopy experts working in pigmented lesion clinics. Objectives To assess the impact of dermoscopy on clinical diagnosis and management decisions for pigmented lesions in everyday practice of general dermatologists. Methods We performed a prospective study in general dermatology clinics in community hospitals run by dermatologists with intermediate dermoscopy experience and expertise. Each clinician independently included suspicious lesions from consecutive patients. Pre‐ and postdermoscopy diagnoses and management decisions were recorded. Pathology was used as reference diagnosis. Results In total, 209 suspicious lesions were included in the study by 17 dermatologists. Fourteen lesions were histologically proven in situ or invasive malignant melanomas. Based on clinical diagnoses, dermoscopy improved sensitivity from 0·79 to 0·86 (P = 1·0). All 14 melanomas were intended to be excised based on naked eye examination alone, independent of dermoscopic evaluation. Specificity increased from 0·96 to 0·98 (P = 0·22). Dermoscopy resulted in a 9% reduction of the number of excisions. Conclusions Dermoscopy reduced the number of excisions, but did not improve the detection of melanomas. Our results suggest that in everyday clinical practice of general dermatologists the main contribution of dermoscopy is a reduction of unnecessary excisions.     

Can automated dermoscopy image analysis instruments provide added benefit for the dermatologist? A study comparing the results of three systems

BACKGROUND: Instruments designed to provide computer program-driven diagnosis of dermoscopic images of lesions are now commercially available. Multiple publications tout the improved diagnostic accuracy of these instruments compared with that of clinicians. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the actual usefulness of these instruments for dermatologists practising in a pigmented lesion clinic. METHODS: Over a 4-month period we subjected lesions, which were being evaluated in one of our clinics, to automated computer diagnosis performed by three commercially available instruments. We intentionally included three groups of lesions: group 1 lesions were suspicious melanocytic lesions that were scheduled to be excised; group 2 lesions were nonmelanocytic lesions; group 3 lesions were clinically obvious melanomas. The automated diagnoses provided by the instruments were compared with the dermoscopy diagnosis of experienced physicians and with histopathology. RESULTS: We included a total of 107 lesions. One imaging system's computer algorithm was unable to analyse one third of the lesions. All three instruments' computer algorithms were able to identify the clinically obvious melanomas (group 3) correctly. However, all three systems tended to overdiagnose by incorrectly classifying most seborrhoeic keratoses (group 2) as potential malignant lesions. Concerning the suspect melanocytic lesions (group 1), which are precisely the lesions for which a dermatologist would welcome a second opinion, we found significant variability in the diagnostic accuracy of the instruments tested. However, all three systems providing computer-assisted diagnosis had a tendency to overdiagnose benign melanocytic lesions as potential melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: Although the image analysis systems tested by us correctly identified the clinically obvious melanomas, they were not able to discriminate between most dysplastic naevi and early malignant melanoma. Thus, for the moment these computer-assisted diagnostic imaging machines provide little to no added benefit for the experienced dermatologist/dermoscopist.     

Dermatoscopy in the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: a new semiology for the dermatologist.

Dermatoscopy or epiluminescence microscopy (ELM), is a noninvasive method that enables clinicians to evaluate fully--by means of a magnified oil immersion diascopy--numerous morphological features, not visible with the naked eye, which enhance the diagnosis of nearly all pigmented skin lesions. In recent years, a burst of research activity in this topic has been carried out, dealing with different aspects, and new frontiers, of this technique. First, a continuous refinement of dermatoscopic terminology is undertaken, paying particular attention to the diagnostic performance of dermatoscopy at peculiar anatomical sites and to the building of different dermatoscopic algorithms aimed at a simplified diagnosis of melanoma, even for less experienced observers. Another point of interest concerns the possible role of dermatoscopy in the pre-operative assessment of melanoma thickness. Finally, promising data about the role of digital equipment in the follow up of melanocytic skin lesions as well as in the automated diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions have been recently reported. This paper should enable readers to become familiar with the procedure and terminology of ELM in the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions encouraging a greater understanding of different methods (pattern analysis, algorithms) in the diagnosis of melanoma using ELM.     

The gold standard for photographing pigmented skin lesions for diagnostic purposes: contact versus distant imaging

Background: It is mandatory that a new diagnostic method be validated by comparison with a well-established reference procedure before being introduced for use in clinical practice. In the field of pigmented skin lesions (PSL), clinical examination should be considered the reference procedure for new diagnostic methods, such as dermoscopy. However, it has not yet been established which is the best photographic procedure for obtaining the most informative clinical images to be used in a formal diagnostic setting.
Methods: In this study we investigated the diagnostic information provided by the two most popular methods currently used for clinical photographing of PSL: 'contact' images obtained with a Dermaphot (Heine Ltd) at original × 10 magnification without oil application and 'distant' images obtained with a macro objective from a distance of 10 cm.
Results: Two experienced dermatologists observed clinical images of a series of 57 PSL (11 melanomas, 31 melanocytic nevi, 10 pigmented basal cell carcinomas, and four other diagnoses). The degree of concordance between the diagnoses based on 'contact' and 'distant' images (melanoma/non-melanoma) was very good (k = 0.819). Regarding histology, the degree of concordance was better when the diagnosis was based on 'contact' images (k = 0.54) than 'distant' images (k = 0.47). In particular, 'contact' images were superior to 'distant' images for diagnosis of non-melanoma lesions (specificity of melanoma diagnosis 87.7% vs. 83.6%), but we found no difference in melanoma detection (73% of sensitivity for both methods).
Conclusions: Although the two photographic procedures appear to provide similar levels of diagnostic information, the 'contact' method seems to provide a higher specificity for melanoma diagnosis.     

Objective melanoma progression

Background/purpose: Many aspects of the natural history of malignant melanoma (MM) are still unclear, specifically its appearance at onset and particularly how it changes in time. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively determine objective changes in melanoma over a 3–24‐month observation period. Materials and methods: Our study was carried out in two Italian dermatology centers. Digital dermoscopy analyzers (DB‐Mips System) were used to retrospectively evaluate dermoscopic images of 59 MM (with no initial clinical aspects suggesting melanoma) under observation for 3–24 months. The analyzer evaluates 49 parameters grouped into four categories: geometries, colors, textures and islands of color. Multivariate analysis of variance for repeated measures was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the changes in the digital dermoscopy variables of melanomas. Results: Within‐lesion analysis indicated that melanomas increased in dimension (Area, Minimum, and Maximum Diameter), manifested greater disorganization of the internal components (Red, Green and Blue Multicomponent, Contrast, and Entropy) and increased in clusters of milky pink color (Light Red Area). Conclusion: Analysis of the parameters of our model and statistical analysis enabled us to interpret/identify the most significant factors of melanoma modification, providing quantitative insights into the natural history of this cutaneous malignancy.     

The use of a spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis device in the real-time diagnosis of melanoma in the setting of a melanoma screening clinic

BACKGROUND: Skin imaging devices to aid melanoma diagnosis have been developed in recent years but few have been assessed clinically. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if a spectrophotometric skin imaging device, the SIAscope, could increase a dermatologist's ability to distinguish melanoma from nonmelanoma in a melanoma screening clinic. METHODS: Eight hundred and eighty-one pigmented lesions from 860 patients were prospectively assessed clinically and with the aid of the spectrophotometric device by a dermatologist. Assessment before and after spectrophotometric imaging was made and compared with histology, where available, or with the clinical diagnosis of a dermatologist with 20 years of experience. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-nine biopsies were performed, with 31 melanomas diagnosed. Sensitivity and specificity for melanoma diagnosis before and after spectrophotometry were 94% and 91% vs. 87% and 91%, respectively, with no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (0.932 and 0.929). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides no evidence for the use of SIAscope by dermatologists to help distinguish melanoma from benign lesions.     

Dermoscopy for challenging melanoma; how to raise the 'red flag' when melanoma clinically looks benign

Melanoma may mimic clinically a number of benign skin tumours by exhibiting overlapping features that do not allow accurate differentiation. Dermoscopy is a noninvasive diagnostic tool allowing the evaluation of specific subsurface morphological structures that are useful in most cases to distinguish melanoma from other melanocytic and nonmelanocytic skin tumours. In order to minimize the risk of missing melanoma, the diagnosis should be based on a good correspondence between the clinical and the dermoscopic findings. The case presented here refers to a melanoma clinically simulating dermatofibroma that was biopsied because dermoscopic examination revealed unusual features that did not confirm the clinical diagnosis.     

Differentiation of common benign pigmented skin lesions from melanoma by high-resolution ultrasound

BACKGROUND: There are potential clinical benefits if non-invasive methods can be used to diagnose or exclude melanoma. OBJECTIVES: We investigated high-resolution ultrasound (HRU) as a potential non-invasive diagnostic aid for pigmented skin lesions. METHODS: Using a 20-MHz ultrasound B-scan imaging system interfaced to a computer, we assessed acoustic shadowing and entry echo line enhancement (EEE) for 29 basal cell papillomas (BCPs) and 25 melanomas. Acoustic shadowing was estimated by the dermal echogenicity ratio (DER), comparing mean echogenicity below the lesion with that of adjacent dermis. Histological features were scored independently. RESULTS: DER < 3 correctly distinguished melanoma from BCP with 100% sensitivity and 79% specificity. Specificity increased to 93% if the presence of EEE was included as a discriminator. Shadowing correlated most significantly with histological extent of hyperkeratosis (P < 0.0001). Consequently, this method falsely identified non-keratotic acanthotic BCP (n = 3) as melanoma. Highly significant differences between benign naevi (n = 15) and melanomas (n = 24) were found. The SD of retrolesional echogenicity was higher for naevi than melanomas (P < 0.0001), but such an analysis was poorly specific for the diagnosis of melanoma (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, HRU has considerable potential as a high-performance screening tool to assist in the discrimination between BCP, but not benign naevi, and melanoma. In particular, it may be possible to exclude melanoma with 100% certainty in the differentiation of BCP from melanoma.     

Utility of the Wood's light: five cases from a pigmented lesion clinic

We demonstrate the utility of the Wood's light in a practice that specializes in the evaluation of pigmented lesions. The Wood's light assisted the physician in locating the site of a completely regressed primary cutaneous melanoma, determining the clinical borders of a lentigo maligna melanoma, differentiating between agminated naevi and a naevus spilus and detecting the recurrence of pigmentation after the excision of a dysplastic naevus, and also proved useful in monitoring a large segmental speckled atypical lentiginous naevus for change. Despite the availability of many 'high-tech' imaging and diagnostic devices designed to evaluate skin lesions, the relatively simple Wood's lamp continues to be of great value. We encourage physicians not to abandon the use of the Wood's light in their clinical practice.     

Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic features

BACKGROUND: Amelanotic malignant melanoma is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma with little or no pigment on visual inspection. It may mimic benign and malignant variants of both melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether dermoscopy is also a useful technique for the diagnosis of amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective clinical study of 151 amelanotic/hypomelanotic skin lesions from 151 patients with a mean age of 47 years (+/- 17.5 SD). Digitized images of amelanotic/hypomelanotic skin lesions were converted to JPEG format and sent by e-mail from the five participating centres. Lesions included 55 amelanotic/hypomelanotic nonmelanocytic lesions (AHNML), 52 amelanotic/hypomelanotic benign melanocytic lesions (AHBML), and 44 AHM, 10 (23%) of which were nonpigmented, truly amelanotic melanomas (AM). The 44 AHM lesions were divided into thin melanomas (TnM) 1 mm (15 cases), according to the Breslow index. Five clinical features (elevation, ulceration, shape, borders and colour) as well as 10 dermoscopic criteria (pigment network, pigmentation, streaks, dots/globules, blue-whitish veil, regression structures, hypopigmentation, leaf-like areas, multiple grey-bluish globules, central white patch) and eight vascular patterns (comma, arborizing, hairpin, dotted, linear irregular, dotted and linear irregular vessels, and milky-red areas) were evaluated in order to achieve clinical and dermoscopic diagnoses. Statistical analyses were performed with the chi2-test and Fisher's exact test, when appropriate. RESULTS: The most frequent and significant clinical features for TnM and TkM were asymmetry and ulceration (the latter only for TkM) compared with AHBML. Irregular dots/globules (62% vs. 35%; P 相似文献   

The significance of multiple blue-grey dots (granularity) for the dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma

BACKGROUND: The presence of multiple blue-grey dots (MBGD) is widely used by clinicians to decide if a pigmented lesion should be removed, but only little is known about their significance. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the significance of MBGD for the dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma. METHODS: In part 1 we retrospectively evaluated 340 pigmented lesions for the presence and morphological appearance of granularity. One hundred and seventy melanomas were included and matched with 170 benign and dysplastic naevi which were randomly chosen from our collection. In part 2, 3773 lesions were examined prospectively in at-risk patients: all lesions with granularity were recorded, surgically removed and subjected to histopathological examination. RESULTS: In part 1, granularity was found in 26.5% of the benign lesions and 93.5% of melanomas. The presence of granularity, granularity at the periphery, irregularly distributed granularity and granularity in association with red and white colour were statistically highly significant for the diagnosis of melanoma (P < 0.001). In part 2, granularity was found in 1.08% of the 3773 lesions and more frequently in sun-damaged skin. Sensitivity for the diagnosis of melanoma was 85% and specificity 99%. CONCLUSIONS: After the revision of many lesions with MBGD, we concluded that the term 'granularity' better describes this entity. Lesions with irregular granularity (periphery, irregularly distributed) should be removed especially if they are associated with red, blue or white colour. Lesions with a benign dermoscopy pattern which have granularity with a regular appearance and involving only a small portion of the lesion do not require surgical excision.     

Possible role of dermoscopy in the detection of a primary cutaneous melanoma of unknown origin

For 2-8% of patients with metastatic melanoma, cutaneous and mucosal clinical examination does not lead to diagnosis of the primary tumour, which remains unknown. We report the case of a 41-year-old male patient who had received a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma after histological examination of an enlarged axillary lymph node, without previous detection of the primary lesion at his first dermatological examination. No pigmented skin lesions located in the anatomical area potentially drained by the affected axillary basin showed clinical features suggestive of a melanoma. Neither did the so-called 'ugly duckling' sign help us to identify the melanoma, because of the presence of a large number of clinically similar, common or slightly atypical melanocytic lesions located in that area. After dermoscopic examination we were able to narrow the field of possible candidates for excision to four lesions, selected on the basis of their dermoscopic features. Histological examination revealed the primary melanoma (superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), level III, thickness 0.5 mm)--located on the back--and three naevi with atypia. Preoperative distinction of the melanoma from the other three lesions was not possible because of the lack of well-established features of malignancy, even at dermoscopic analysis ('featureless' melanoma). Dermoscopy may thus play a role in the detection of a clinically unknown primary melanoma by narrowing the field of lesions to be removed for histological examination, saving many unnecessary excisions that would otherwise be inevitable.     

Colorimetric analysis of pigmented skin lesions: a pilot study with the Visi-Chroma™ VC-100 device

BACKGROUND: Definition of the colour of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) with the naked eye remains subjective and may be influenced by lighting. This problem underlines the usefulness of instrumental assessments such as epiluminescence microscopy and colorimetric devices. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: We describe here a new method of colour analysis of PSLs with the Visi-Chroma VC-100 device, which illuminates the surface of the skin with white light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and analyses the reflected light by a red-green-blue (RGB) charge-coupled device (CCD) colour camera. Twenty-one PSLs to be excised for cosmetic or medical reasons were analysed by this device with clinicopathological correlation. CONCLUSIONS: This method is feasible and might be useful to assess the colour of PSLs and allow comparisons for changes over time. Further studies are needed to determine the usefulness of this device in clinical practice.     

Melanomas detected with the aid of total cutaneous photography

BACKGROUND: Early detection of melanoma results in excision of thinner melanomas, which are associated with better prognosis. Total cutaneous photography provides a temporal comparison of lesions, which allows clinicians and patients to recognize new and subtly changing lesions. OBJECTIVES: We examined the utility of total cutaneous photography in detecting melanoma, identified the reason for biopsy of suspicious lesions and determined who detected new melanomas, the physician on follow-up examination or the patient on self-examination. PATIENTS/METHODS: The charts of the 576 patients in the total cutaneous photography database were reviewed. Twelve patients were identified who had melanoma diagnosed with photographic assistance. Baseline and prebiopsy photographs, dermatology clinic notes (115 patient visits) and pathology reports for each biopsied lesion were reviewed. Histological diagnosis, cause for biopsy, and whether the lesion was detected by the patient or physician, was recorded for each of the biopsied lesions. Also noted were all the lesions that concerned patients, the cause for concern, and whether these lesions were biopsied. RESULTS: A total of 93 lesions were biopsied in these patients. Twenty-seven (35%) of 77 melanocytic lesions were histologically diagnosed as melanoma. The thickest melanoma found measured 1.1 mm, indicating a favourable prognosis in our patients. Seventy-four per cent of the melanomas were biopsied due to changes from baseline and 19% were biopsied because they were new lesions. The changes noted were subtle and the lesions that proved to be melanoma did not satisfy the classical clinical criteria for melanoma. Eight (30%) of the melanomas were identified by patients on skin self-examination. Twenty-six per cent of the lesions that concerned patients were not biopsied after evaluation by a physician. CONCLUSIONS: We found that photographically assisted follow-up helped detect new and subtly changing melanomas, which did not satisfy the classical clinical features of melanoma. In addition, photographically assisted follow-up helped detect nonmelanoma skin cancers. Patient skin self-examination proved to be valuable, in that it complemented physician follow-up examination in detecting melanomas. Photographic follow-up was also valuable in avoiding unnecessary biopsy in suspicious, but stable lesions. Total cutaneous photography therefore may be an effective way to increase the sensitivity and specificity for detecting melanoma.