Venous limb gangrene during overlapping therapy with warfarin and a direct thrombin inhibitor for immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

We report two patients with deep-vein thrombosis complicating immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who developed venous limb gangrene during overlapping therapy with a direct thrombin inhibitor (lepirudin or argatroban) and warfarin. In both patients, therapy with the direct thrombin inhibitor was interrupted during persisting severe athrombocytopenia while warfarin administration continued. Both patients exhibited the typical feature of a supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INRs, 5.9 and 7.3) that has been linked previously with warfarin-associated venous limb gangrene. These data suggest that warfarin anticoagulation be postponed in patients with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia until substantial recovery of the platelet count has occurred.     

Dermatan sulphate in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Patients with thromboembolic diseases who develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II require an alternative anticoagulation strategy. Dermatan sulphate (DS) was administered to five patients with thromboembolic diseases who developed HIT type II and showed an in vitro cross-reactivity with low molecular weight heparins. The platelet count and the extension of thrombosis were monitored during DS administration. In four of the five patients the platelet count rapidly increased after heparin was discontinued and DS started. A low platelet count persisted in the single patient with cross-reactivity to DS, up to 4 d after its discontinuation. None of the patients experienced thrombus extension, haemorrhagic side-effects or other adverse events.     

Outpatient Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease with Subcutaneous Lepirudin: A Case Report

Outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis has gained widespread acceptance and is facilitated by the use of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). We report two patients in whom subcutaneous lepirudin was used for long term anticoagulation after heart transplant or surgical pulmonary embolectomy because treatment with LMWH or warfarin was contraindicated, unsuccessful, or impractical. Neither bleeding complications nor recurrent thromboses developed. Subcutaneous lepirudin may be safely and effectively employed for the outpatient treatment of venous thrombosis in selected cases including patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and in those who fail LMWH.     

Platelet response to direct thrombin inhibitor or fondaparinux treatment in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Making a definitive diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can be problematic. A prompt platelet rise following treatment has been proposed as a “post-test” criterion for diagnosis. However, the platelet response following discontinuation of heparin and initiation of a recommended alternative anticoagulant remains largely undefined and unstudied. This study aimed to characterize platelet response to initial treatment in patients with a low, intermediate, or high likelihood of having HIT. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients were over 18 years in age, underwent serologic testing for HIT, and received alternative anticoagulation treatment for HIT. Classification of each patient’s likelihood of having HIT was based on an empiric, pre-hoc combination of the 4T score and serology results. The primary outcome for this study was a platelet count response after initiation of direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) or fondaparinux therapy within 48 h. 124 patients were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of having an immediate platelet rise of at least 10,000/µL by day 2 after starting treatment among high-likelihood for HIT patients were 0.71 (95% CI 0.55–0.84) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.5–0.76), respectively. The negative predictive value of no platelet rise was 75.5% (95% CI 0.61–0.86). A prompt platelet count rise may be appropriate to consider along with other known criteria for the clinical diagnosis of HIT. The rise should be immediate following discontinuation of heparin and initiation of recommended treatment, with an upward rise within 48 h.     

Use of recombinant hirudin as antithrombotic treatment in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare but severe complication of heparin therapy that can result in severe venous or arterial thromboembolic events and whose treatment remains partially unanswered. Recombinant hirudin is potentially effective as an antithrombotic treatment in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, given its potent antithrombin effects without known interaction with platelets. We report the results obtained with intravenous recombinant hirudin (HBW 023) administered on a compassionate basis to patients suffering from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Six patients suffering from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were submitted to intravenous recombinant hirudin (HBW 023) administered at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg/hr after an initial bolus injection of 0.07 mg/kg in the case of a venous thromboembolic event, and at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg/hr with the same initial bolus injection in the case of an arterial thromboembolic event. Whenever possible, oral anticoagulation with acenocoumarol was introduced at the same time as recombinant hirudin, which was interrupted as soon as the international normalized ratio reached 3. Clinical events, particularly thromboembolism and bleeding, were noted; activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and platelet count were assessed throughout the administration of recombinant hirudin. Heparins responsible for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were porcine sodium or calcium heparinate in four cases, nadroparin in one case, and enoxaparin in one case. Thrombocytopenia was discovered on routine systematic platelet count in two patients and after the occurrence of arterial and venous thromboembolism in two patients, respectively. After discontinuation of heparin and the onset of recombinant hirudin, clinical evolution was uneventful in all patients, with no recurrence of thromboembolism, limb amputation, or hemorrhagic complication. The aPTT ratio varied from 1.8 to 3.5 (median 2.4) throughout administration of recombinant hirudin. Platelet count rose from nadir (median value 60 × 10⁹ 15 to 90) to above 100 × 10⁹/L in every patient within 3–6 days (median 5), after discontinuation of heparin. Intravenous administration of recombinant hirudin ensured safe anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and made it possible to wait for oral anticoagulation to become efficient and platelet count to return to normal values without occurrence or recurrence of thromboembolism.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Opinion statement Treatment with heparin is associated with two types of thrombocytopenia. The most worrisome of these is the immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II). Suspicion of HIT type II mandates immediate cessation of heparin adminis-tration and consideration of an alternative anticoagulation therapy. Hirudin and argatroban are approved alternative anticoagulants with no cross-reactivity with the HIT antibody. HIT type II is a clinicopathologic syndrome, and therefore diagnosis requires clinical and laboratory confirmation. The laboratory evaluation for HIT type II should also determine whether or not there is HIT-antibody cross-reactivity with danaparoid and low molecular weight heparin. Patients with HIT type II who require coronary artery bypass graft surgery present a particularly difficult situation, as there is no ideal alternative to heparin anticoagulation.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: 2008 update

Opinion statement Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) preparations are two of the most commonly prescribed medications in the hospital, and indications for their use are increasing. An increasingly recognized untoward effect of either UFH or LMWH is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a transient, prothrombotic condition that may result in venous or arterial thrombosis and amputation or death. This immune-mediated process generally develops within 4 to 14 days of administration, although it may occur more rapidly if there has been a recent exposure; it may even occur days to weeks after UFH or LMWH has been discontinued. Although once considered necessary for the diagnosis of HIT, thrombocytopenia is no longer essential. A 50% reduction in the platelet count from pre-heparin treatment levels is now considered a more specific finding. Prompt recognition, discontinuation of the offending agent, and initiation of an alternative anticoagulant are essential for prevention and/or treatment of these potentially devastating complications.     

The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in medical patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin: a prospective cohort study

In contrast with extensive documentation in patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in medical patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is less well defined. In a prospective cohort study, the platelet count was monitored in 1754 consecutive patients referred to 17 medical centers and treated with LMWH for prophylaxis or treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The diagnosis of HIT was accepted in case of a platelet drop of at least 50%, the absence of obvious explanations for thrombocytopenia, and the demonstration of heparin-dependent IgG antibodies. HIT developed in 14 patients (0.80%; 95% CI, 0.43%-1.34%), in all of them within the first 2 weeks, and was more frequent in patients who had (1.7%) than in those who had not (0.3%) been exposed to UFH or LMWH (OR = 4.9; 95% CI, 1.5-15.7). The prevalence of thromboembolic complications in HIT patients (4 of 14; 28.6%) was remarkably higher than that (41 of 1740; 2.4%) observed in the remaining patients (OR = 16.6; 95% CI, 5.0-55.0). Immune thrombocytopenia and related thromboembolism may complicate the clinical course of medical patients treated with LMWH with a frequency that is not different from that observed with the use of UFH. The previous administration of heparin increases the rate of HIT.     

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a prothrombotic drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. OBJECTIVE: To describe a syndrome termed delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, in which thrombocytopenia and thrombotic events begin 5 or more days after withdrawal of heparin. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Secondary and tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: 12 patients who presented with serologically confirmed, delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including 6 outpatients presenting after hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS: The platelet serotonin-release assay was used to measure IgG-induced heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet activation; an enzyme immunoassay that detects IgG against platelet factor 4-heparin complexes was also used. RESULTS: Patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presented with thrombocytopenia and associated thrombosis a mean of 9.2 days (range, 5 to 19 days) after stopping heparin therapy. Nine patients received additional heparin, with further decrease in platelet counts. Compared with controls, patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia had higher titers of IgG antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin and greater IgG-induced heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet activation. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be suspected when patients present with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis up to 3 weeks after exposure to heparin. This syndrome could be caused by high titers of platelet-activating IgG induced by heparin.     

Comparison of the platelet pro-aggregatory effect of conventional unfractionated heparins and a low molecular weight heparin fraction (CY 222)

Two unfractionated heparins (UH), a porcine intestinal mucosal heparin (PIM), a bovine lung heparin (BLH) and a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), CY 222, were assessed for their capacity to enhance platelet aggregation in vitro. Their potential proaggregatory effect was investigated in four systems: (a) enhancement of submaximal platelet aggregation induced by conventional agonists in platelet rich plasma and (b) in whole blood; (c) reversal of inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by iloprost, a stable analogue of prostacyclin; (d) the direct aggregatory effect of these anticoagulants on hyperactive platelets prepared from patients with severe peripheral vascular disease or anorexia nervosa. Whereas BLH and PIM, at therapeutic concentrations, had a proaggregatory effect in all four systems, CY 222 had no significant effect when compared with the controls. BLH was more potent than PIM in three of the four systems studied. These observations confirm that conventional UH are more proaggregatory than LMWH, and thus the latter may be potentially safer. These observations are also consistent with the fact that BLH administration causes thrombocytopenia more frequently than PIM. The direct activation by UH of platelets from patients not previously exposed to heparin also challenges the hypothesis that heparin-induced platelet activation and thrombocytopenia is solely mediated by classical heparin-dependent immune mechanisms.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are two types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT I is characterized by a transitory, slight and asymptomatic reduction in platelet count, occurring in the first 1-2 days of therapy, that resolves spontaneously; in contrast, HIT II, which has an immunologic origin, is characterized by a significant thrombocytopenia generally after the fifth day of therapy that usually resolves in 5-15 days only after therapy withdrawal. HIT II is the most frequent and dangerous side-effect of heparin therapy; in fact, in spite of thrombocytopenia, it can be complicated by venous and arterial thrombosis. Therefore, the recognition of HIT II may be difficult due to the underlying thrombotic symptoms for which heparin is administered. The aim of this article is to review the most recent advances in the field and to give critical guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HIT II. STATE OF THE ART: The prevalence of HIT II, as confirmed by laboratory tests, seems to be about 2% in patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UH), while it is much lower in those receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The immunologic etiology of HIT II is largely accepted. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) displaced from endothelial heparan sulphate or directly from the platelets, binds to the heparin molecule to form an immunogenic complex. The anti-heparin/ PF4 IgG immunocomplexes activate platelets and provoke an immunologic endothelial lesion with thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis. The IgG anti-heparin/PF4 immunocomplex activates platelets mainly through binding with the FcgRIIa (CD32) receptor. The onset of thrombocytopenia is independent of the dosage, schedule and route of administration of heparin. Orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery patients receiving post-surgical prophylaxis or treatment for deep venous thrombosis are at higher risk of HIT II. Besides thrombocytopenia, cutaneous allergic manifestations and skin necrosis may be present. Hemorrhagic events are not frequent, while the major clinical complications in 30% of patients are both arterial and venous thromboses which carry a 20% mortality. The diagnosis of HIT II should be formulated on the basis of clinical criteria and in vitro demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies. Functional tests, such as platelet aggregation and (14)C-serotonin release assay and immunologic tests, such as the search for anti-PF4/heparin complex antibodies by an ELISA method are available. If HITT II is probable, heparin must be immediately suspended and an alternative anticoagulant therapy should be initiated before resolution of thrombocytopenia and the following treatment with a vitamin K antagonist. The general opinion is to administer low molecular weight heparin (in the absence of in vitro cross-reactivity with the antibodies), heparinoids such as Orgaran or direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin. PERSPECTIVES: Further studies are required to elucidate the pathogenesis of HIT II and especially to discover the clinical and immunologic factors that induce the occurrence of thrombotic complications. The best therapeutic strategy remains to be confirmed in larger clinical trials.     

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Acknowledging Its Presence in Low-Molecular Weight Heparin Therapy

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with a lower incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) than is unfractionated heparin. We describe a 75-year-old woman who developed HIT with thrombotic manifestations following the use of nadroparin calcium. Subsequent anticoagulation was achieved with warfarin. This case serves to highlight an important complication that cannot be ignored despite its low incidence. The majority of HIT cases are likely to occur in LMWH-treated patients because LMWH replaces unfractionated heparin for most indications. The lack of suitable alternative anticoagulant treatments for patients with HIT in Singapore is also emphasized.     

Lethal heparin-associated pulmonary embolism--case reports

Thrombocytopenia is a known adverse reaction occurring in some patients receiving heparin. Two different types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have been described. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type I is a mild thrombocytopenia after 1 to 4 days of heparin therapy, attributed to a direct interaction between heparin and circulating platelets. No specific treatment is necessary. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II is a severe thrombocytopenia mediated by an immunologic mechanism. Type II generally develops after 5 to 10 days of heparin therapy and can be associated with potentially devastating thromboembolic complications. The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II is below 3%. Thromboembolic events are always accompanied by a decrease in the platelet count, however, complications in the absence of absolute thrombocytopenia have been reported. Diagnosis of HIT type II is based on clinical features and laboratory studies for the heparin-dependent platelet antibody. Immediate cessation of heparin administration is essential. Several alternative anticoagulant therapies have been studied and have shown promising results when used for this purpose. Two patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery are presented in whom pulmonary embolism developed due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II. In both cases, platelet counts were within the subnormal range at the time of the first thromboembolic complication. The clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic implications are discussed.     

The management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology has produced a concise practical guideline to highlight the key issues in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) for the practicing physician in the UK. The guideline is evidence-based and levels of evidence are included in the body of the article. All patients who are to receive heparin of any sort should have a platelet count on the day of starting treatment. For patients who have been exposed to heparin in the last 100 d, a baseline platelet count and a platelet count 24 h after starting heparin should be obtained. For all patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH), alternate day platelet counts should be performed from days 4 to 14. For surgical and medical patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) platelet counts should be performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving treatment doses of LMWH should have platelet counts performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving prophylactic LMWH are at low risk and do not need routine platelet monitoring. If the platelet count falls by 50% or more, or falls below the laboratory normal range and/or the patient develops new thrombosis or skin allergy between days 4 and 14 of heparin administration HIT should be considered and a clinical assessment made. If the pretest probability of HIT is high, heparin should be stopped and an alternative anticoagulant started at full dosage unless there are significant contraindications while laboratory tests are performed. Platelet activation assays using washed platelets have a higher sensitivity than platelet aggregation assays but are technically demanding and their use should be restricted to laboratories experienced in the technique. Non-expert laboratories should use an antigen-based assay of high sensitivity. Only IgG class antibodies need to be measured. Useful information is gained by reporting the actual optical density, inhibition by high concentrations of heparin, and the cut-off value for a positive test rather than simply reporting the test as positive or negative. In making a diagnosis of HIT the clinician's estimate of the pretest probability of HIT together with the type of assay used and its quantitative result (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, only) should be used to determine the overall probability of HIT. Clinical decisions should be made following consideration of the risks and benefits of treatment with an alternative anticoagulant. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, heparin should be stopped and full-dose anticoagulation with an alternative, such as lepirudin or danaparoid, commenced (in the absence of a significant contraindication). Warfarin should not be used until the platelet count has recovered. When introduced in combination with warfarin, an alternative anticoagulant must be continued until the International Normalised Ratio (INR) is therapeutic for two consecutive days. Platelets should not be given for prophylaxis. Lepirudin, at doses adjusted to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio of 1.5-2.5, reduces the risk of reaching the composite endpoint of limb amputation, death or new thrombosis in patients with HIT and HIT with thrombosis (HITT). The risk of major haemorrhage is directly related to the APTT ratio, lepirudin levels and serum creatinine levels. The patient's renal function needs to be taken into careful consideration before treatment with lepirudin is commenced. Severe anaphylaxis occurs rarely in recipients of lepirudin and is more common in previously exposed patients. Danaparoid in a high-dose regimen is equivalent to lepirudin in the treatment of HIT and HITT. Danaparoid at prophylactic doses is not recommended for the treatment of HIT or HITT. Patients with previous HIT who are antibody negative (usually so after >100 d) who require cardiac surgery should receive intraoperative UFH in preference to other anticoagulants that are less validated for this purpose. Pre- and postoperative anticoagulation should be with an anticoagulant other than UFH or LMWH. Patients with recent or active HIT should have the need for surgery reviewed and delayed until the patient is antibody negative if possible. They should then proceed as above. If deemed appropriate early surgery should be carried out with an alternative anticoagulant. We recommend discussion of these complex cases requiring surgery with an experienced centre. The diagnosis must be clearly recorded in the patient's medical record.     

Have You Been HIT?

This review is specifically designed to aid the vascular surgeon in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare complication of heparin administration, which poses significant morbidity and mortality. Its onset is usually 5 to 10 days after the heparin administration and should be suspected if platelet counts drop by at least 50%. Confirmation is given by the presence of HIT antibodies on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or in functional platelet activation assays. The major complication is thrombosis and surprisingly bleeding is rare. Heparin must be stopped immediately if there is a clinical suspicion of HIT and alternative anticoagulation must be started. Anticoagulation is required for at least 2 to 3 months to prevent recurrence of thrombosis. Oral anticoagulation with warfarin should not be initiated until the platelet count has been recovered and there should be an overlap of at least 5 days between starting warfarin and stopping the alternative anticoagulant.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin-induced skin necrosis

 We report a case of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)-induced skin necrosis in a patient with chronic lymphatic leukemia. The patient had heparin-PF4 antibodies and the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test was positive, but platelet counts remained normal. Analysis of seven cases of LMWH-induced skin necrosis revealed that this complication occurred mostly in patients previously exposed to heparin, and that severe problems such as thrombocytopenia or thromboembolic complications were rare. This is in contrast to skin necrosis induced by unfractionated heparin (UFH), where a substantially higher number of patients suffered from thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism. In addition, most patients with UFH-induced skin necrosis were not pretreated with heparin. Therefore, it is possible that LMWH is less immunogenic than UFH and requires repeated exposure for induction of skin necrosis. Received: February 18, 1998 / Accepted: May 11, 1998     

Incidence and clinical relevance of heparin-induced antibodies in patients with deep vein thrombosis treated with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin

The frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) varies between different clinical treatment settings and remains unknown for patients treated with unfractionated (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) because of deep vein thrombosis. In this multicentre, open-label study, 1137 patients with deep vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to UFH for 5-7 d, reviparin, a LMWH, for 5-7 d (short-treated group) or reviparin for 28 d (long-treated group). Heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies (HPF4-A) were determined on d 5-7 and d 21. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was defined by clinical evaluation. Two patients in the UFH group (incidence: 0.53%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-1.91) and two patients in the long-treated LMWH group (incidence: 0.53%, 95% CI: 0.06-1.92) had HIT, while no HIT was observed in the short-treated LMWH group. Pulmonary embolism developed in one of the HIT-patients, who had HPF4-A and was treated with UFH. On d 5-7 the incidence of HPF4-A was 9.1% in the UFH group, 2.8% in the short-treated LMWH group and 3.7% in the long-treated LMWH group, with a significant increase to 20.7% in the UFH group and to 7.5% in the long-treated LMWH group on d 21. Therefore the incidence of HPF4-A and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was lower in patients treated with LMWH compared with UFH for the same duration of treatment.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the emergency department

We describe 3 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with stroke, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism and renal failure after undergoing cardiac surgery 7 to 17 days earlier. Their onset of thrombosis after previous heparin exposure was temporally plausible for complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an immune-mediated thrombotic disorder triggered by heparin. The patients had normal platelet counts at presentation, yet each had circulating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies that were ultimately confirmed. Two patients had heparin reexposure in the ED, 1 of whom developed thrombocytopenia with new thrombosis and died. Alternative parenteral anticoagulation prevented further thrombosis in 2 patients. Because heparin use can be catastrophic in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, physicians should be vigilant in suspecting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with thrombosis after recent hospitalization or heparin exposure. Alternative anticoagulants are available for these at-risk patients.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia is a common adverse effect of heparin therapy which may occur with bovine or porcine heparin when it is given either intravenously or subcutaneously. There are two main clinical types: a common, mild thrombocytopenia of early onset, probably due to the platelet proaggregating effect of heparin itself and a severe delayed-onset thrombocytopenia caused by an immune mechanism. Patients with mild thrombocytopenia due to heparin are usually asymptomatic. However, patients with severe thrombocytopenia may develop thromboembolic complications which often result in disastrous sequelae such as limb gangrene necessitating amputation or death. The thromboembolic complications may be attributed to an IgG heparin-dependent platelet antibody which induces thromboxane production and platelet aggregation. The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is made clinically and may be confirmed by the demonstration of the heparin-dependent antibody in vitro by platelet aggregometry or [14C] serotonin release. In patients with delayed-onset severe thrombocytopenia, heparin should be stopped and warfarin commenced. Antiplatelet drugs and/or dextran may also be added. Recently low molecular weight heparin has been used with some success. Conversely, heparin may be continued in patients with asymptomatic mild thrombocytopenia provided the patients' condition and the platelet counts are closely monitored.