Comparative assessment of helical CT-angiography, 2D TOF MR-angiography and 3D gadolinium enhanced MRA in aorto-iliac occlusive disease

PURPOSE: To compare helical CT-angiography (CTA) and two techniques of MR angiography (MRA) to conventional angiography in aorto-iliac occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 22 patients (4 for preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and 18 for peripheral vascular disease) were imaged using four techniques: digital subtraction angiography ("gold standard"), 2D TOF MR angiography, 3D Gd-enhanced MR angiography and helical CT angiography. Source (CTA and 2D TOF MRA) and MIPed images (after subtraction measures before and after gadolinium injection for 3D Gd-MRA) were reviewed. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of significant (>50%) stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries were respectively: 38%, 89%, 77% for 2D TOF MRA; 75%, 71%, 72% for 3D Gd-MRA and 95%, 90%, 92% for CTA. Excluding the internal iliac arteries, results were 54%, 96%, 88% for 2D TOF MRA; 96%, 80%, 83% for 3D Gd-MRA and 92%, 93%, 95% for CTA. CONCLUSION: 3D Gd-MRA, a technique with potential for further improvement, is superior to 2D TOF MRA for detecting significant stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries. Results at Gd-MRA are nearly similar to those at CTA (after excluding internal iliac arteries). Results at Gd-MRA are not affected by calcified plaque.     

Equilibrium-phase MR angiography of the aortoiliac and renal arteries using a blood pool contrast agent

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic usefulness of a new blood pool contrast agent, NC100150, for assessing the aortoiliac and renal arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with hemodynamically significant stenosis (> or =50% of luminal diameter) of the iliac or renal arteries or an aortic aneurysm documented by digital subtraction angiography underwent MR angiography at 1.5 T after administration of NC100150. Three-dimensional MR angiographic data sets were collected ill the equilibrium phase. In a prospective analysis, each vascular segment (16 segments per arterial tree) was evaluated. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the NC100150 administration well. Mean contrast-to-noise ratios of the vascular data collected in the equilibrium phase of NC100150 was 3.3+/-15.9. Compared with digital subtraction angiography, the sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography for the renal arteries were 82% and 98%, respectively; for the common iliac arteries, 86% and 97%, respectively; for the external iliac arteries, 80% and 100%, respectively; and for the internal iliac arteries, 71% and 977, respectively. All 83 aneurysmal changes revealed by digital subtraction angiograpy of the aortoiliac arteries were well displayed on the MR angiographic data sets. CONCLUSION: Equilibrium-phase NC 00150-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography shows high specificity when evaluating the abdominal and pelvic vascular systems, but the attendant venous overlap can limit the assessment of stenosis in renal and pelvic arterial segments.     

Table-moving contrast-enhanced MR angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Table-moving contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) was performed in 14 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm to evaluate its clinical usefulness. In all cases, aneurysms were clearly demonstrated and image quality was clinically acceptable. Findings of reconstructed MRA were highly consistent with those of DSA, and thrombosed areas were confirmed on source images. Main aortic branches including renal arteries, common iliac arteries, and internal and external iliac arteries were readily identified on reconstructed MRA and/or source images. Additional findings such as thoracic aortic aneurysm (n = 1), common iliac aneurysm (n = 6), external iliac aneurysm (n = 1), internal iliac aneurysm (n = 1), femoral arterial obstruction (n = 2), and femoral arterial stenosis (n = 4) were also detected. Although table-moving MRA may have disadvantages like reduced blood signal and limited spatial resolution compared with the conventional contrast-enhanced technique, the images that were obtained provided sufficient contrast and resolution for preoperative evaluation. Because abdominal aortic aneurysm is accompanied by various arterial abnormalities in many of the large arteries, table-moving MRA was considered a suitable technique for comprehensive assessment.     

Evaluation of the iliac arteries: Comparison of two-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography

We compared dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight (3DTOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with two-dimensional time of flight (2DTOF) MRA with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo (C-MON) and conventional angiography (CA) when it was available. C-MON re-orders the normal data acquisition to minimize ghosting artifacts generated by pulsatile flow. The initial phase of the study involved optimization of parameters and comparison C-MON with no C=MON in eight patients and volunteers. The final phase of the study involved 53 patients who were imaged with contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON. Thirty of these patients also had CA. In the initial phase, 2DTOF MRA with C-MON was found to be equal (n = 3) or superior (n = 5) to 2DTOF without C-MON. In the final phase, the agreement among all imaging modalities varied from substantial to almost perfect (Cohen's _K = .6-.83). The lowest agreement was using 2DTOF to evaluate the external iliac segments. The among suggested treatments varied from substantial to almost perfect for all imaging modalities (Cohen's _K = .73–93). The diagnostic efficacies of 2DTOF with C-MON and contrast-enhanced 3DTOF were high overall, with the lowest value being a specificity of 63% for one reader in the evaluation of an external iliac segment using 2DTOF. In summary, 2DTOF with C-MON helped to eliminate artifacts due to pulsatility in the iliac arterial segments. In our experience, both dynamic constrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON performed well in the evaluation of the iliac arteries. Both studies have high interobserver agreement and high diagnostic efficacy. Contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA should be reserved for situations in which the iliac vessels are extremely tortuous or occluded or the external iliac segments are poorly seen.     

Interobserver agreement for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in peripheral arterial disease

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare interobserver agreement for interpretations of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Of 226 eligible patients, 69 were excluded. The remaining 157 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized to either MR angiography (n = 78) or MDCT angiography (n = 79). Two observers independently evaluated for arterial stenosis or occlusion on MR angiography (2,157 segments) and MDCT angiography (2,419 segments) using a 5-point ordinal scale. Vessel wall calcifications were noted. Interobserver agreement for each technique was evaluated with a weighted kappa (kappa(w)) statistic. RESULTS: Although interobserver agreement for both was excellent, the interobserver agreement for MR angiography (kappa(w) = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.92) was higher than that for MDCT angiography (kappa(w) = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86) for reporting the degree of arterial stenosis or occlusion in all segments. For the different anatomic locations, the interobserver agreement for MR angiography versus MDCT angiography was as follows: aortoiliac (kappa(w) =0.91 vs 0.84, respectively), femoropopliteal (kappa(w) = 0.91 vs 0.87), and crural (kappa(w) = 0.90 vs 0.83) segments. The interobserver agreement of MDCT angiography significantly decreased in the presence of calcifications but was still good for all anatomic locations. The lowest agreement was found for crural segments in the presence of calcifications (kappa(w) = 0.67). With MR angiography, there were 12 times more nondiagnostic segments than with MDCT angiography (81 vs 7, respectively). CONCLUSION: Interpretations of MR angiography and MDCT angiography for peripheral arterial disease have an excellent interobserver agreement. MR angiography has a higher interobserver agreement than MDCT angiography, and the presence of calcified segments significantly decreases interobserver agreement for MDCT angiography.     

Perianal infections: reader agreement and diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MRI

We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the contrast-enhanced fat-suppression technique in the detectability of perianal infections and to compare this technique with different MR sequences used for this purpose. Thirty consecutive patients with clinically suspected anorectal infections were examined with fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery (STIR), and fat-suppressed and non-fat-suppressed T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo (SGE) (in-phase) dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. The results of MRI were correlated with the findings of surgery, which was considered as the standard of reference. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were reconstructed to describe and compare the diagnostic value of each MR technique. The values of kappa were used as a measure of observer reliability. Diagnostic performances of STIR, FSE T2-weighted and fat-suppressed and non-fat-suppressed, contrast-enhanced SGE T1-weighted techniques showed statistically insignificant differences in detection of perianal infections. There was almost perfect interobserver agreement regarding the presence of lesions on each MR technique. Fat-suppressed, contrast-enhanced SGE T1-weighted MRI showed adequate diagnostic performance in the detection of perianal infections. However, its significance is not different from the other MR sequences used for the present study.     

Contrast-enhanced 3D FISP MR angiography of the aortic arch ostia: preliminary results

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) for the detection of ostial stenoses of the aortic arch. METHOD: Sixteen patients with suspected carotid atherosclerotic disease prospectively underwent digital subtraction angiography of the aortic arch followed by contrast-enhanced MRA using a 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) technique (TR = 5 ms, TE = 2 ms, flip angle = 30 degrees). Three neuroradiologists blindly measured stenoses on the catheter angiograms and MRA. Evaluation included the ostia of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries. Any significant disagreement on catheter angiography was resolved by consensus. The MRA grades of each of the three observers were then compared with the consensus grades of the contrast angiogram. RESULTS: Forty-eight vessels were scored, of which five had significant stenoses. MRA demonstrated 100% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 52% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. The Bowker test for symmetry indicated no significant difference between conventional angiography and MRA scores (p = 0.32-0.75), and there was good agreement between the three observers (weighted kappa = 0.75-0.86). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced 3D FISP MRA may be a useful imaging modality for the detection of significant stenoses at the ostia of the major aortic arch branches.     

Bilateral Leg Ischemia due to Descending Aortic Dissection: Combined Treatment with Femoro-femoral Cross-over Bypass and Unilateral Aorto-iliac stenting

We report a case of aorto-iliac occlusion due to descending aortic dissection treated initially with femoro-femoral cross-over bypass and secondarily with unilateral aorto-iliac stenting because of progression of the dissection. A 75-year-old man presented with acute ischemia of the right leg. CT revealed occlusion of the right iliac artery due to descending aortic dissection with a clotted false lumen. Three days after femoro-femoral cross-over bypass, ischemia of both legs developed and angiography demonstrated occlusion of the infrarenal aorta and left common iliac artery. Two overlapping stents were deployed in these vessel segments. Completion angiography confirmed successful recanalization with adequate distal flow and good patency of the cross-over bypass. Peripheral pulses were restored and the patient’s symptoms were alleviated. Combined treatment with cross-over bypass and endovascular recanalization may be considered as a viable alternative to open aortic surgery in selected cases of complicated aorto-iliac dissection with bilateral leg ischemia.     

Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for stenosis depiction in malfunctioning hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs), as compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts in 48 consecutive patients. Vascular tree of accesses was divided into between three and eight segments depending on access type (AVF or AVG) and length of venous outflow. Images obtained with MR and DSA were interpreted by two MR radiologists and two interventional radiologists, respectively, who were blinded to information from each other and other studies. DSA was reference standard for stenosis detection. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of contrast-enhanced MR in detection of vascular segments containing hemodynamically significant (> or =50%) stenosis were calculated. Linear-weighted kappa statistic was calculated for contrast-enhanced MR and DSA to determine interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection. RESULTS: A total of 282 vascular segments were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced MR depicted three false-positive stenoses and all but two of 70 significant stenoses depicted with DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MR in detection of vessel segments with significant stenoses were 97% (95% CI: 90%, 99%), 99% (95% CI: 96%, 100%), 96% (95% CI: 88%, 99%), and 99% (95% CI: 97%, 100%), respectively. MR demonstrated significant stenosis in four of five nondiagnostic DSA segments, whereas DSA showed no significant stenosis in four nondiagnostic MR segments. Linear-weighted kappa statistic for interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95) for MR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.97) for DSA. CONCLUSION: MR angiography depicts stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis accesses but has limited clinical value as result of current inability to perform MR-guided access interventions after stenosis detection. MR of dysfunctional access should be considered only if nondiagnostic vascular segment is present at DSA.     

Using gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate use of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in the assessment of suspected arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients receiving kidney transplants (26 single-kidney transplants and two en block transplants) with suspected arterial inflow stenosis were examined with two MR angiography sequences: gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) imaging and 3D phase-contrast imaging. Twenty-four of these patients then were examined using the gold standards: either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 23) or surgery (n = 1). MR angiography and DSA studies were independently and prospectively analyzed for the presence of arterial stenoses (mild [<50%], severe [50-90%], or critical [>90%]) in the iliac, anastomotic, and renal artery segments. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the MR angiography sequences for ability to detect or exclude significant (> or = 50%) arterial stenoses. RESULTS: In 22 single-kidney transplants, DSA showed eight significant stenoses in 66 arterial segments. MR angiograms adequately showed 66 of 66 segments (prospective observers) and 64 of 66 segments (each retrospective observer), which were subsequently evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography in revealing significant stenoses were 100% and 98% (prospective analysis), 88% and 98% (retrospective observer 1), and 86% and 100% (retrospective observer 2). Concordance between observers showed kappa values exceeding .85 for all comparisons except the analysis of phase-contrast series (kappa = .62). In one en block transplant, DSA showed that stenosis was greater than 90%, although it had been graded at less than 50% with MR angiography. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography accurately evaluated arterial inflow in single-kidney transplants.     

Prospective comparison of MRA with catheter angiography in the assessment of patients with aortoiliac occlusion before surgery or endovascular therapy

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of gadolinium enhanced 3D magnetic resonance (MR) angiography (CE MRA) as an alternative to translumbar or brachial angiography in the pre-operative work-up of patients with aortoiliac occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients (14 men and five women; age range 45-77 years; mean 62 years), not suitable for perfemoral angiography (aortoiliac occlusion, n = 18; infected femoro-femoral graft with femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, n = 1), underwent pre-operative CE MRA and catheter angiography (translumbar, n = 5; brachial, n = 14). CE MRA was performed using a 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled pulse sequence during the intravenous injection of 40 ml of gadolinium DTPA and a 32-s breath-hold. All patients subsequently underwent surgical (n = 13) or percutaneous transluminal (n = 6) treatment for their vascular disease. The accuracy of CE MRA was determined compared with the findings at catheter angiography taken as the gold standard. RESULTS: CE MRA gave accurate information about the occlusion, inflow and distal run-off in the majority of patients. CE MRA revealed occlusions with an accuracy of 94.7% in the aortic segment, 98.7% in the iliac segment, and 100% in the common femoral segment. The arterial segments distal to the common femoral artery were not completely visualized in four patients but CE MRA provided sufficient information to plan either surgical or percutaneous transluminal therapy in all but one patient. CONCLUSION: CE MRA is highly accurate in showing the presence and extent of aortoiliac occlusions. In our study group, CE MRA gave sufficient information in the pre-operative evaluation of aortoiliac occlusion.     

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography

Conventional angiography, two-dimensional inflow magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and color duplex ultrasound (US) were performed on 12 patients in a blinded, prospective study. The ability to grade arterial lesions and plan revascularization interventions were compared. Arterial lesions were categorized as nonsignificant (0%-49% diameter reduction) or significant (50%-100% diameter reduction). Determination of nonsignificant and significant lesions with MR angiography was in agreement with that at conventional angiography in 100 of 140 lesions (71%). Agreement between results of conventional angiography and color duplex US occurred with 114 of 123 infrainguinal lesions (93%). Twenty-one vascular interventions were planned by using conventional angiography; there was agreement with color duplex US in 11 cases and MR angiography in five. Color duplex US performed well in the assessment of infrainguinal disease but was limited in the evaluation of iliac segments because of nonvisualization. The iliac region was visualized in more patients with MR angiography than with color duplex US, but image quality with MR angiography was inconsistent. Strategies to improve MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature merit further study.     

Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media bolus in the evaluation of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta

PURPOSE: To investigate the potentials of 3D breath-hold contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis, follow-up and treatment planning of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm underwent MRA. We used a 1.5 T unit (GE Horizon, Echospeed 8.2), a phased array surface coil and 3D Fast SPGR T1-weighted sequences acquired on the coronal plane during patient breath-hold and after contrast agent i.v. administration. A bolus-test was done before angiography to optimize imaging delay time. After 3D MRA a Fast-SPGR T1-weighted sequence was acquired on the axial plane. The 3D MRA source images were processed with the MIP algorithm. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were carried out. Helical CT was performed in 6 cases and DSA in 7 cases. Surgery was the reference standard in 15 patients. RESULTS: MRA depicted aneurysm thrombosis in 22 cases, carrefour involvement in 18 cases and iliac arteries involvement in 3 cases. Accessory renal arteries were shown in 4 cases; iliac artery stenosis was associated in 5 cases. There was agreement between MR and Helical CT and DSA findings: surgery confirmed MRA results in 15/15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: 3D contrast-enhanced MRA can be considered the method of choice in the follow-up and treatment planning of abdominal aortic aneurysms, because it provides both angiographic and tomographic images: this allows to obtain more information, noninvasively and without the use of ionizing radiations.     

Breath-hold gadolinium enhanced tree-dimensional MR angiography: personal experience in the thoracic-abdominal area

PURPOSE: To investigate different clinical applications of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (Gd MRA) using three-dimensional breath-hold GE sequences, without bolus time calculation, in patients with vascular diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients were examined (49 studies in all). Eleven of them had an abdominal aortic aneurysm, 6 surgical bypass, 7 renal artery stenosis, 3 aortoiliac Wallstent, 7 aortic stent-graft; 11 patients had a suspected condition in the thoracic aorta and pulmonary arteries, 1 had subclavian artery stenosis and 1 suspected axillary artery compression. All patients were submitted to breath-hold Gd MRA, after 30-40 mL Gd, with a 1.5 T magnet (Gyroscan ACS-NT, Philips, The Netherlands) and a standard body coil. The GE sequences were acquired with TR = 8.8, TE = 2.7, FA = 60 degrees, matrix = 163 x 512, with 28 seconds acquisition time. Digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative findings were the reference standards to evaluate the results. RESULTS: Thoracopulmonary district: metastatic compression of axillary vessels was found in 1 breast cancer patient; the true and the false lumens and the intimal flap were identified in 2 patients with chronic aortic dissection (Stanford A), and graft patency and complete resolution of the aortic dissection was seen in the patient operated on for acute aortic dissection (Stanford A). The thrombus, lumen, extent and diameter were studied in 2 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Subclavian artery stenosis was demonstrated in 1 patient, which was treated with transluminal angioplasty and stenting. The other 6 patients had normal findings. Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA): as for disease extent, breath-hold Gd MRA had 100% sensitivity and specificity compared with surgical findings. Juxtarenal aneurysm extent, which had been missed at DSA, was detected in 1 patient and then confirmed at surgery. Stenosis: comparing DSA and MRA findings in the whole series of patients we had 97.4% agreement (155/159 arteries), that is 76.4% (13/17) arteries) considering only stenoses > 50%. Breath-hold Gd MRA sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 87.5%, respectively, in our 28 stenoses. Bypass, aortoiliac stent, vascular endograft: patency was demonstrated in all the 6 surgical bypass patients, and there was agreement with color Doppler findings in 5 of 6. Breath-hold Gd MRA seems to have no possible applications in the follow-up of percutaneously implanted iliac stents, but we had excellent findings about patency and position of nichel-titanium endografts used for AAA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We optimized breath-hold 3D MRA without bolus transit time calculation and with high-dose Gd in different clinical vascular conditions. In our opinion, 3D GE sequences can replace DSA in selected cases, providing a fast, accurate and noninvasive examination.     

MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA

PURPOSE: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MR angiography (i.e., contrast-enhanced MRA [CE-MRA]) of the pedal vasculature with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 patients with PAOD were prospectively examined at 1.5T. For contrast enhancement, 0.1 mmol/kg body weight of Gd-BOPTA were applied. MRA consisted of dynamic imaging with acquisition of six consecutive data sets. Acquisition time for each data set was 24 seconds, voxel size was 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.3 mm(3). A total of 20 out of 22 patient underwent selective DSA, two patients fine-needle DSA. DSA and MRA were performed within seven days. Image analysis was independently done by two observers with assessment of overall image quality, motion artifacts, detection of patent vessel segments of the distal calf and pedal vessels, and the number of patent metatarsal arteries. After four weeks, a consensus reading of DSA images was done. A second consensus reading of CE-MRA was performed after a further six weeks. RESULTS: Consensus readings of MRA and DSA revealed higher image quality and fewer motion artifacts for MRA (P = 0.021 and P = 0.008, respectively, sign test); interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.78) for image quality, and moderate (kappa = 0.46) for motion artifacts. There were no differences between CE-MRA and DSA in detecting patent vessel segments with a high degree of agreement (kappa = 0.89), and interobserver agreement for MRA was substantial (kappa = 0.89). Significantly more vessels were assessed as partially occluded on DSA than on CE-MRA (P = 0.004). There was a good agreement between DSA and CE-MRA for assessment of relevant vessel stenosis (kappa = 0.61); interobserver agreement for MRA was good (kappa = 0.65). CE-MRA detected significantly more patent metatarsal arteries than did DSA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRA is comparable to DSA for assessment of the pedal vasculature, and is able to delineate significantly more patent vessels without segmental occlusions and more metatarsal arteries than selective DSA.     

脑肿瘤磁共振血管成像的初步研究

目的：应用ＴＯＦ法ＭＲＡ显示脑肿瘤的肿瘤血管、供血动脉、引流静脉和脑血管移位与侵犯等，以探讨ＭＲＡ无创性评价脑肿瘤的价值。材料与方法：对４３例脑肿瘤患者进行了ＴＯＦ法ＭＲＡ（ｎ＝４３）与脑血管造影（ｎ＝１５）和／或手术结果（ｍ＝４１）对比评价。采用１．０Ｔ超导ＭＲ系统，二维或三维ＦＩＳＰ扫描，用或不用预饱和技术和Ｇｄ－ＤＴＰＡ，ＭＩＰ重建获取ＭＲＡ图像。结果：ＭＲＡ准确了７６．２％的肿瘤富血管度，     

Multiphase magnetic resonance angiography of the abdominal and pelvic arteries: results of a bicenter multireader analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of multiphase 3D gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (3D-Gd-MRA) for assessment of abdominal and pelvic vascular disease. METHODS: In 41 patients from two different institutions multiphase 3D-Gd-MRA of the aorta and pelvis was performed using an identical scanning protocol. In a single breath-hold three to four consecutive phases were acquired. Stenoses in the renal arteries, and aorta and pelvic arteries were independently evaluated by three readers and compared with digital subtraction angiography. Interobserver variability was compared by means of a kappa statistic. RESULTS: Accuracy for stenosis grading consistently ranged between 80% and 90% for all three readers in all vessel segments studied. Good interobserver agreement was found with kappa values exceeding 0.75. Vessel segments with delayed fill-in could be reliably detected on the multiple successive MRA phases. Overall, MRA was rated slightly superior to Digital Subtraction Angiography in terms of interobserver variability, diagnostic confidence and image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Multiphase MRA is a highly robust technique with reproducible accuracy for different observers and different institutions. It can therefore be recommended for screening of atherosclerotic abdominal and pelvic disease.     

Colon diseases: MR evaluation using combined T2-weighted single-shot echo train spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo sequences

This study demonstrates the appearance of large bowel diseases on magnetic resonance (MR) images using breath-hold T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition snapshot turbo spin-echo (HASTE), breath-hold T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo (SGE), and breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted SGE with and without fat-suppression sequences. The study represents a collective experience using a generalized combined abdominal-pelvic imaging protocol. Of 29 patients, 27 had surgical, endoscopic, microbiological, and/or histopathological correlation, and 2 had a diagnosis based on characteristic imaging findings. Fifteen patients had neoplastic disease including colon adenocarcinoma (n = 11), rectosigmoid carcinoid (n = 1), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 2), and cecal lipoma (n = 1). Fourteen patients had non-neoplastic disease including diverticulosis (n = 6), ischemic colitis (n = 2), pseudomembranous colitis (n = 2), acute appendicitis with periappendiceal abscess (n = 2), Mycobacterium avium intracellulare (MAI) colitis (n = 1), and Crohn's proctocolitis (n = 1). In all 15 patients with neoplastic diseases, MR imaging depicted the primary lesions and demonstrated local extent. Mass lesions were best shown on T2-weighted HASTE and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed SGE images. Of 14 patients with non-neoplastic diseases, inflammatory changes were best shown on gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SGE images in all cases. MR imaging with fast scanning breath-hold techniques and intravenous gadolinium enhancement provided good depiction and characterization of large bowel diseases.     

Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether multidetector CT (MDCT) angiography is an accurate and reliable method of revealing atheroocclusive disease of the aortoiliac system and the lower extremities compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with ischemic legs underwent both MDCT angiography and DSA of the aortoiliac system and the legs. The arterial supply of the legs was divided into 35 segments. Three independent observers rated each segment according to the maximal degree of arterial stenosis. Consensus interpretation was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of MDCT angiography in showing arterial occlusions and stenoses of at least 75%. Intertechnique agreement was measured for each anatomic segment, and interobserver agreement was calculated for both techniques. Agreement was quantified using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT angiography for depicting arterial occlusions and stenoses of at least 75% were 88.6% and 97.7%, and 92.2% and 96.8%, respectively. Substantial intertechnique agreement (kappa > 0.4) was present in 102 (97.1%) of 105 arterial segments. Substantial interobserver agreement was present in 104 (99.0%) of 105 comparisons for both MDCT angiography and DSA with an average kappa value of 0.84 for CT and 0.78 for DSA. MDCT angiography showed more patent segments than DSA (1192 vs 1091). All nine segments seen on DSA and not seen on MDCT angiography were in the calves. Of 110 segments seen on MDCT angiography and not seen on DSA, 100 (90.9%) were in the calves. CONCLUSION: MDCT angiography was accurate in showing arterial atheroocclusive disease with reliability similar to DSA. MDCT angiography showed more vascular segments than DSA, particularly within calf vessels.     

Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography

PURPOSE: To compare multi-detector row spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in evaluation of the infrarenal aorta and lower-extremity arterial system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease were evaluated with multi-detector row CT angiography and DSA. Arteries depicted at CT angiography and DSA were graded separately for degree of stenosis as 23 anatomic segments (infrarenal aorta, right and left common iliac artery, internal iliac artery, external iliac artery, common femoral artery, superficial femoral artery, deep femoral artery, popliteal artery, anterior tibial artery, tibioperoneal trunk, posterior tibial artery, and peroneal artery). Grades included the following: 1, normal patency; 2, moderate (< or =50%) stenosis; 3, focal severe (>50%) stenosis; 4, multiple severe stenoses; and 5, occlusion. Three readers independently interpreted the images, and statistical analysis was performed. The results of image interpretation were evaluated for strength of agreement by using Cohen kappa statistics. On the basis of consensus readings, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of stenotic lesions were calculated, with findings at DSA used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement was achieved in all cases. At DSA, 349 diseased segments were found among the 1,137 segments evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, based on a consensus reading of multi-detector row CT angiograms, were 96%, 93%, and 94%, respectively. A statistically significant difference (P <.05) between DSA and multi-detector row CT angiography was present only in arteries graded 1 or 2. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect among the three readers for treatment recommendations based on findings at CT angiography and DSA. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT angiography appears consistent and accurate in the assessment of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.