非脱垂子宫经阴道切除术的临床应用

目的对新式非脱垂子宫经阴道切除术开展临床研究。方法对良性病变的非脱垂子宫切除的患者,分为新式TVH与腹式两组进行临床观察。结果新式TVH组平均手术时间、肛门排气时间≤48小时、术后病率、术后疼痛、住院时间分别为70.32±17分钟、93.7%、15.6%、75%、5.2±1.19天,腹式组分别为102.67±17分钟、54.8%、64.5%、6.4%、8.2±1.00天,新式TVH组与腹式组比较差异有非常显著性(P均<0.01)。两组平均出血量分别为132.1±34.2ml、120±33.4ml,新式TVH组较腹式组稍多,但差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论新式TVH组子宫切除较腹式子宫切除手术时间短,腹腔干扰少,术后胃肠功能恢复早,疼痛轻,术后病率低,住院日短,腹壁不留切口疤痕,深受患者青睐。只要掌握好手术适应证,非脱垂子宫经阴道切除可充分展示出其诸多优越性。     

改良式经阴道非脱垂子宫切除术92例临床效果观察

目的探讨经阴道非脱垂子宫切除术(TVH)的术式改进及临床效果.方法回顾性分析92例改良TVH术式患者的术中、术后情况,并与腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)患者比较.结果平均手术时间改良TVH组51±18分钟,LAVH组98±27分钟;术后肛门排气时间改良TVH组18±5小时,LAVH组23±6小时;术后疼痛改良TVH组14例(30.45%),LAVH组21例(55.26%);住院时间改良TVH组5±1天、LAVH组6±2天,差异均有显著性(P＜0.05).术中出血量、术后病率改良TVH组与LAVH组比较,差异均无显著性(P＞0.05).结论在一定适应证下,改良式经阴道非脱垂子宫切除术较腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术具有手术时间短,术后疼痛轻,肠功能恢复快,体表不留瘢痕,住院时间短等优点,是值得推广的手术方式.     

阴式非脱垂子宫三角形切除术的术式探讨

目的:对阴式非脱垂子宫三角形切除术的可行性及临床应用价值进行探讨。方法:采用特制阴道手术器械,对64例有手术适应证而无生殖道脱垂的子宫肌瘤患者行阴式子宫三角形切除,与同期经腹子宫三角形切除及阴式非脱垂子宫次全切除术各63例作对比分析。结果:阴式三角组与腹式三角组相比,手术时间、术中出血、术前术后血清女性激素水平差异无显著性(P>0.05),术后住院天数、肛门排气时间、尿管留置时间及下床活动时间相比差异有显著性(P<0.05);结论:阴式非脱垂子宫三角形切除术创伤小,术后疼痛轻,恢复快,不影响卵巢血供,无围绝经期症状出现等优点,在临床中应用安全可行。     

改良阴式子宫切除术128例临床分析

目的:评价改良阴式子宫切除术在子宫或宫颈良性病变中的临床应用.方法:对2005年12月至2008年12月我院128例行改良阴式子宫切除术(改良组)与30例行传统阴式子宫切除术(传统组)患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果:改良组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、肛门排气时间、术后发热时间及术后病率、术后疼痛比例均明显少于传统组,P＜0.05.改良组子宫平均重量大于传统组,两者比较差异有高度统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论:与传统阴式子宫切除术相比较,改良的阴式子宫切除具有手术时间短、术中出血少、术野暴露较充分、术后恢复快等优点,是一种安全、有效的子宫切除术式.     

非脱垂瘢痕子宫阴式和腹式全切术临床评价

目的　评价非脱垂瘢痕子宫阴式和腹式全切术的临床效果。方法　选择于 2002年 1月至 2003年10月在仁济医院妇科住院的非脱垂瘢痕子宫患者。其中行阴式子宫全切术 38例,术中于子宫瘢痕处采用筋膜内锐性分离的方法,分解子宫膀胱粘连。以 59例行常规腹式子宫全切术患者为对照组。对两组的手术时间、术中出血量和术后住院天数等方面的差异进行前瞻性研究。结果　阴式组的手术时间与腹式组相比差异无显著意义(P>0.05);阴式组的术中出血量和术后住院天数明显少于腹式手术组,差异有显著性意义(P值分别为P<0.05和P<0.01)。结论　非脱垂瘢痕子宫行经阴式全切术优于经腹式全切术。     

非脱垂子宫阴式与腹腔镜辅助下阴式全切术临床应用研究

目的:探讨经阴道、经腹腔镜辅助的阴式非脱垂子宫切除手术在临床应用的效果。方法:对患子宫良性病变有手术指征的非脱垂子宫患者181例,66例行腹式子宫切除手术(TAH)组,60例行阴式子宫切除手术(TVH)组,55例行腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)组,对比分析各组的临床治疗效果。结果:TVH组、LAVH组术后肛门排气时间、住院天数均比TAH组少;LAVH组手术时间较TVH组、TAH组明显延长,手术费用较后两组高;TAH组术中出血量较TVH组、LAVH组明显增加。结论:经阴道、经腹腔镜辅助的阴式非脱垂子宫切除手术具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短等优点,符合微创手术原则,值得推广。     

非脱垂瘢痕子宫阴式切除术65例临床分析

目的:探讨非脱垂瘢痕子宫经阴道切除的可行性及临床应用价值.方法:引进特制阴道手术器械,对65例有盆腔操作史的瘢痕子宫行阴式全子宫切除(研究组),与同期经阴道无手术史非脱垂子宫切除66例(对照组)作对比分析.结果:研究组手术时间、术中出血比对照组明显增加(P＜0.05),但两组术后住院天数、肛门排气时间及术后病率相比,差异无显著性(P＞0.05).结论:非脱垂瘢痕子宫不再是阴式手术绝对的禁忌证,术后恢复仍能体现阴式手术的优势,但有2次或以上盆腔手术史和有慢性盆腔感染致严重粘连的,应选择腹腔镜或开腹手术为宜.     

阴式子宫次全切除术42例分析

目的 探讨对非脱垂、良性病变的子宫实施阴式子宫次全切除术的可行性和安全性。方法 2000年1月至2002年12月对42例患良性子宫疾病，且为非脱垂子宫，并排除宫颈恶性疾病，要求保留宫颈的患者，实施阴式子宫次全切除手术。分析手术时间、术中出血量、术中和术后并发症、住院时间、术后性生活情况。结果 平均手术时间60min，平均出血量85mL，平均住院时间是5d。3例术后发热，6例术后有阴道少量血性分泌物，持续3～5d自行好转。21例术后12个月随访性生活满意。结论 非脱垂、良性病变子宫小于10孕周大小者，实施经阴道次全子宫切除术是安全、可行的。     

非脱垂式阴式全子宫切除术30例分析

目的:探讨并分析非脱垂式阴式全子宫切除术在临床上的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析我院2007年6月至2010年6月妇产科收治30例非脱垂阴式子宫全切除手术(TVH)与30例经腹全子宫切除手术(TAH)30例进行比较。结果:两手术组均手术成功,术中、术后无并发症,TVH组无论从出血量、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间和住院时间均优于TAH组,P<0.05有显著差异,手术时间上无显著差异P>0.05。结论:非脱垂式阴式全子宫切除手术损伤小、康复快,是一种良好的新型手术方法。     

阴式子宫全切术与经腹子宫全切术的临床比较

目的：对比阴式子宫全切术（TVH）与经腹子宫全切术（TAH）的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析2010年10月至2012年10月本院进行的79例全子宫切除患者的临床资料,其中阴式子宫全切术（TVH）36例,经腹子宫全切术（TAH）43例,比较2组患者的相关情况。结果：TVH组手术时间略长于TAH组,差异有显著性（P〈0．05）,术后镇痛率、肛门排气时间、住院天数、恢复正常工作时间等方面均优于TAH组,差异有显著性（P〈0．05）,术中出血量、术后病率、手术费用等差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论：TVH手术方式创伤小、疼痛轻、术后恢复快,宜推广使用。     

Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an enlarged uterus is associated with an increased rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) after benign total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). STUDY DESIGN: Women who underwent TAH or TLH were stratified, according to uterine weight, into 3 groups: group 1, uterine weight < 200 g; group 2, 201-500 g; and group 3, > 500 g. Indications included uterine leiomyomas, chronic pelvic pain, prolapsed uterus, endometriosis and adenomyosis, dysfunctional uterine bleeding; all had benign final pathology. Statistical analysis compared risks of intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. RESULTS: Prolonged hospital stay risk increased for uterine weight > 500 g (p < or = 0.001). There was a significant association between postoperative complications and uterine size (p < or = 0.001). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) also increased with uterine weight > 500 g (p < or = 0.001). TLH was associated with fewer postoperative complications, shorter LOS and reduced EBL (p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Average LOS and risk of blood loss, blood transfusion and other postoperative complications after hysterectomy for benign disease increased with increasing uterine weight. TLH is an excellent alternative for enlarged uteri; it was strongly associated with decreased morbidity, shorter LOS, and reduced EBL and blood transfusion rate in all uterine weight groups when adjusted for other variables.     

阴式子宫切除术50例临床分析

目的 探讨阴式子宫切除术（ＴＶＨ）的优点、适应证、手术要点及临床应用价值。方法 自１９９５年１０月至１９９８年１１月,对５０例因多发性子宫肌瘤、子宫腺肌病、宫颈原位癌、功能失调性子宫出血及子宫内膜不典型增生而部垂患者,行ＴＶＨ。术前子宫大小正常者１０例（２０％）,子宫〉１２周者（大子宫）１６例（３２％）,子宫增大但≤１２周者２４例（４８％）。既往有手术史者６例（１２％）。同时行附件功除术者１１例（     

Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE: We compared operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative recovery, return to work, and costs for women undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n = 24) versus abdominal hysterectomy (n = 24) was carried out in a tertiary care setting. The main outcome variables were operative time, length of hospital stay, and return to work. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain and return to normal activity as determined by weekly visual analog scales and daily diary. Hospital costs were calculated. RESULTS: The laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy group had longer operative times (median and quartiles, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy 180 [139, 225] minutes vs abdominal hysterectomy 130 [97, 155] minutes), lower requirements for postoperative intravenous analgesia (patient-controlled analgesia pump, median and quartiles: laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy 22.1 [15.9, 23.5] hours, abdominal hysterectomy 36.7 [26.2, 45.0] hours), shorter length of hospital stay (median and quartiles, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy 1.5 [1.0, 2.3] days, abdominal hysterectomy 2.5 [1.5, 2.5] days), and quicker return to work (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P =.03). Both procedures had similar hospital costs (P =.21). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy appears to allow patients a more rapid postoperative recovery and an earlier return to work with hospital costs similar to those of abdominal hysterectomy.     

Vaginale und abdominale Hysterektomie

Hysterectomy is one of the most common major gynecological operations. There are several different techniques for performing it, and if it is indicated, the appropriate operative approach, vaginal or abdominal, must be chosen. The advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches, the uterine size and mobility, previous operations, the surgeon’s experience, and the local operating conditions should all be considered. Vaginal hysterectomy has advantages compared with abdominal hysterectomy: The operating time is shorter, it is safer, and the hospital stay and recovery time are shorter as well. Therefore, a vaginal approach should be preferred in patients with benign diseases. Vaginal uterine extirpation is the first operative choice in patients with uterus myomatosus and dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The integration of new technical possibilities, such as bipolar coagulation forceps, has improved haemostasis and produces less blood loss and less postoperative pain.     

Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases

Despite more than 1000 publications on laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), its role remains difficult to define. LH is not there to replace vaginal hysterectomy, but may be an alternative for abdominal hysterectomy when there are (relative) contraindications for vaginal hysterectomy, including concomitant oophorectomy, previous pelvic surgery and/or risk for adhesions, the larger uterus and nulliparity, and some oncological indications. Randomized trials have demonstrated that, compared to abdominal hysterectomy, LH shortens hospital stay and induces less postoperative pain and quicker recovery at the expense of a longer operation time. LH carries a higher risk for adjacent organ injury, and may be cost-effective, despite higher direct costs, because of the shorter hospital stay and quicker recovery.     

Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised controlled multicentre study

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal total hysterectomy regarding influence on postoperative psychological wellbeing and surgical measures. DESIGN: A prospective, open, randomised multicentre trial. SETTING: Five hospitals in the South East of Sweden. POPULATION: Hundred and twenty-five women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions were enrolled in the study, and 119 women completed the study. Fifty-six women were randomised to abdominal hysterectomy and 63 to laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: Psychometric tests measuring general wellbeing, depression and anxiety preoperatively and 5 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effects of operating method on the psychological wellbeing postoperatively. Analysis of data regarding operating time, peroperative and postoperative complications, blood loss, hospital stay and recovery time. RESULTS: No significant differences in the scores were observed between the two groups in any of the four psychometric tests. Both the surgical methods were associated with a significantly higher degree of psychological wellbeing 5 weeks postoperatively compared with preoperatively. The operating time was significantly longer for the laparoscopic hysterectomy group, but the duration of the stay in hospital and sick-leave were significantly shorter for laparoscopic hysterectomy group compared with the abdominal hysterectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: General psychological wellbeing is equal after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy within 6 months after the operation. The advantages of the laparoscopic hysterectomy are the shorter stay in hospital and shorter sick-leave, but these issues must be balanced by a longer duration of the operation.     

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess whether laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy achieves better clinical results compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library and China Biological Medicine Database were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy. Twenty-three trials were studied and the analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5 and R Version 2.11.1. The results showed that laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy was associated with a longer operation time, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, smaller haemoglobin drop, less postoperative pain, quicker return to normal activities and fewer peri-operative complications. Quality of life is likely to be the key outcome to evaluate the approach for hysterectomy, but further research is needed. For suitable patients and surgeons, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy is a better choice than abdominal hysterectomy.     

Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate and compare laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging with conventional laparotomy for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: From July 2001 to December 2003, a retrospective review of patients with endometrial carcinoma was carried out. The medical records of those patients who had undergone surgical staging with hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLN) were evaluated. Primary outcome measures were operating time (OT), estimated blood loss, total number of lymph nodes yielded, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULT: A total of 64 cases were identified. Two cases were excluded because of incomplete records. Two cases with para-aortic lymphadenectomy and four cases with Wertheim's hysterectomy were excluded from the study. Thirty-six patients underwent laparotomy with total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and PLN (laparotomy group). Twenty patients underwent the same surgery by laparoscopy, of which 19 were successfully carried out (laparoscopy group). One case was converted to laparotomy. The mean OT in the laparoscopy group was longer when compared with the laparotomy group (211 min vs 94 min, P < 0.001). The mean estimated blood loss in the laparoscopy group was less (200 mL vs 513 mL, P < 0.001). The post-operative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopy group (3.6 days vs 7.7 days, P < 0.001). The mean number of lymph nodes yielded was more in the laparoscopy group (26.1 vs 16.7, P = 0.004). Neither group had intraoperative complications and both had similar postoperative complication rates. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma is associated with significantly less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, longer OT time, and more lymph nodes yielded when compared with laparotomy.     

Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications of abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged, myomatous uterus with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of 139 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation and 244 patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy for an enlarged, myomatous uterus between August 1990 and July 2001 were reviewed. Uterine weights of >982 g were excluded because this was the largest uterus removed vaginally, which left 208 evaluable cases of total abdominal hysterectomy. The perioperative and postoperative course of the two groups was compared. The Student t test was used for continuous variables, and the Fisher exact test was used for binary or categoric data. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in surgical or anesthetic risk factors (P>.05). Operative time was similar between the groups (P>.05). Length of hospital stay was increased significantly with total abdominal hysterectomy (mean, 3.9 days vs 2.6 days; P<.001). Perioperative complications were increased with the abdominal route (10% vs 25%, P<.001). CONCLUSION: In this large series, uterine morcellation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy is safe and facilitates the removal of moderately enlarged and well-supported uteri and is associated with decreased hospital stay and perioperative morbidity rate compared with the abdominal route.     

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To see whether laparoscopy provides exact staging and effective treatment of endometrial cancer patients, compared with total abdominal hysterectomy, with shorter hospital stay, prompter recovery, and better quality of life. METHOD: This retrospective study identified 110 patients scheduled for surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. Fifty-five (50%) were treated by laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 55 (50%) by total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). All patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy. The majority of patients (79%) had stage I disease. RESULTS: The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 17 for the LAVH group and 18.5 for the TAH group (p = 0.294). Compared with TAH, LAVH required a significantly longer operating time (220 vs. 175 min; p < 0.01); but shorter hospital stay (4 vs. 8.5 days; p < 0.001) and less estimated blood loss (177 cm3 vs. 285 cm3; p = 0.02). Overall, there were fewer post-operative complications in the LAVH group (6 vs. 11 cases; p < 0.001). Three TAH patients (5.4%) had recurrence of disease. No LAVH patients had recurrences and all are currently disease-free. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest LAVH gives correct staging of endometrial disease, like TAH, but with fewer complications and a slightly longer operating time.