Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation From Expanded-Criteria Donors After Circulatory Death

The number of recipients waiting for a transplant is increasing. In Japan, there is more frequent use of organs from expanded-criteria donors (ECDs) after circulatory death. We retrospectively analyzed long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) from expanded-criteria donation after circulatory death (DCD). From 1995 to 2013, 97 cases of KT from DCD donors were performed in our department. Death-censored graft survival rates of ECD kidneys (n = 50) versus standard-criteria deceased-donor (SCD) kidneys (n = 47) for 1, 5, and 10 years after transplantation were 84.0% vs 97.9%, 74.8% vs 95.6%, and 70.2% vs 81.8%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups (P = .102). Kidneys from donors with a history of hypertension (HTN) and cerebrovascular events (CVE) and contribution from older donors had significantly lower 10-year graft survival rates (P values of .010, .036, and .050, respectively). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses showed donor age to be significantly associated with long-term graft survival independently from other factors. These results suggest that ECD kidneys remain an acceptable alternative to dialysis under certain conditions. Increased donor age was a significant risk factor determining long-term graft function. Moreover, comorbidities of HTN and CVE could become significant risk factors, especially in older donors.     

Kidney Transplantation Outcomes From Donors After Controlled Circulatory Death: A Comparison With Expanded Criteria Brain Death Donors

BackgroundThe persistent shortage of optimal kidney donors and the progressive increase in patients on the waiting list have led to an expansion of the acceptance criteria, such as donors after controlled cardiac death (cDCD) and donors after brain death with expanded criteria (DBD-EC). Some concerns and doubts about survival outcomes achieved with these allografts are still present. Our aim was to compare transplant outcomes from cDCD vs DBD-EC.MethodsA retrospective single-center observational study including all kidney transplant (KT) donors from all cDCD and DBD-EC (>60 years) from January 2015 to January 2022 was performed. We analyzed clinical characteristics, early clinical outcomes, and patient and graft survival rates.Results129 cDCD and 166 DBD-EC KT recipients were included. The median follow-up was 30,2 months. DBD-EC were older and had more comorbidities than cDCD. KTs from cDCD and DBD-EC showed similar rates of delayed graft function and primary nonfunction. Patient survival at 1 year was similar (85% DBD-EC vs 90% cDCD, P = .32). Death-censored graft survival at 1 year was similar among young cDCD (18-59 years) and elderly DBD (60-69 years; 97% vs 92.3%, P = .2). Recipient age and expanded criteria in KT from cDCD were related to worse early graft outcomes. The outcomes achieved with KT from cDCD were similar to those observed in older and more comorbid DBD donors. This assumption is worth consideration when choosing the most suitable donor for each recipient.     

Pancreas Transplantation From Donors After Circulatory Death From the United Kingdom

This study reports the comparative short‐term results of pancreas transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD) (Maastricht III & IV), and pancreases from brainstem deceased donors (DBD). Between January 2006 and December 2010, 1009 pancreas transplants were performed in the United Kingdom, with 134 grafts from DCD and 875 from DBD. DCD grafts had no premortem pharmacological interventions performed. One‐year pancreas and patient survival was similar between DCD and DBD, with pancreas graft survival significantly better in the DCD cohort if performed as an SPK. Early graft loss due to thrombosis (8% vs. 4%) was mainly responsible for early graft loss in the DCD cohort. These results from donors with broader acceptance criteria in age, body mass index, premortem interventions, etc. suggest that DCD pancreas grafts may have a larger application potential than previously recognized.     

Results of Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

Confronting the organ donor shortage, many transplant centers around the world increasingly use donors after cardiac death (DCD). Over the past 20 years, follow-up studies in kidney recipients comparing DCD and donors after brain death (DBD) have shown comparable long-term graft function and survival. As a consequence, DCD programs should be continued and expanded, for these donors constitute a potential solution to the imbalance between the numbers of end-stage kidney disease patients on waiting lists versus available kidney grafts. DCD kidneys do not necessarily signify suboptimal grafts; they may merit to be allocated the same as DBD grafts.     

Primary Nonfunction on Kidney Transplant Recipients From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors

BackgroundThe need for donor pool expansion remains an important task for kidney transplantation. The aim of this study is the evaluation of primary nonfunction (PNF) from donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys.MethodsBetween 1996 and 2017, 100 kidney transplants from DCD donors were conducted in our department. We retrospectively analyzed PNF of kidney transplant recipients from DCD donors in terms of donors’ and recipients’ epidemiologic characteristics.ResultsOf 100 grafts, 95 recipients (95.0%) had discontinued hemodialysis at the time of hospital discharge. Only 5 recipients (5.0%) developed PNF. All 5 PNF recipients received a single graft from an expanded criteria donor (ECD). The mean donor age in the PNF group was 65.0 (SD, 6.2) years. Significant differences between the PNF group and discontinued dialysis group were found for donor age (P < .01) and for the use of ECD kidneys (P < .02). Nevertheless, no significant difference was found between groups for several factors: a history of hypertension and cerebrovascular events, terminal creatinine levels, and graft weight.ConclusionThe incidence of PNF from DCD kidneys was very low. Although ECD kidneys in older donors might be a significant risk factor for PNF, these findings suggest that DCD kidneys should be used more frequently for donor expansion.     

Kidney Transplantation From Cardiac Death Donors With Terminal Acute Renal Failure

Objectives

Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors with terminal acute renal failure (ARF) is not widely accepted due to concern about the organ quality. Here we report our initial clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from DCD donors with ARF.

Materials and Methods

The results of 29 kidney transplants from ARF DCD donors were compared with those of 60 kidney transplants from non-ARF DCD donors performed at our center from August 2011 to March 2013.

Results

There was no difference in the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection between ARF and non-ARF kidneys (27.6% vs 16.7%, 10.3% vs 8.3%, respectively). Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was similar between ARF and non-ARF kidneys. With a mean follow-up of 18 months (range 7 to 26 months), actual patient and graft survival rates for ARF DCD recipients were 100% and 96.6%, respectively, which were similar to those of the control group of kidney transplants from non-ARF kidneys (98.3% and 95.0%).

Conclusions

Kidneys from DCD donors with terminal ARF have excellent short-term outcomes and may represent another potential method to safely expand the donor pool.     

Kidney Transplantation in Old Recipients From Old Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The program Old for Old or European Senior Program (ESP), allocates donors aged ≥65 years to recipients of ≥65, within a narrow geographic area in order to minimize cold ischemia time, decrease the waiting time for elderly patients listed for kidney transplantation and expand the transplant resource in this group. The ESP is not officially applied in Greece. In our center, the Old for Old criteria have been used since 2003 for elderly patients who are candidates for kidney transplantation.

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Organ shortage has prompted the use of expanded-criteria donors (ECDs). Our objective was to compare long-term outcomes of kidney transplants from ECDs with those from concurrent standard-criteria donors (SCDs). In addition, we evaluated variables associated with graft survival in both groups.

Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death: An Initial Report of 71 Cases From China

Shortage of deceased donors is a severe problem in recent years in China especially in a culture in which brain death criteria is not widely accepted. Donation after cardiac death (DCD) has been reported to expand the donor pool despite higher rates of primary nonfunction (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF) after transplantation. We collected 71 DCD kidney transplants performed at our hospital between February, 2007 and June, 2012 with aims to demonstrate the feasibility of DCD donation in China. All patients were followed up, and postoperative complications and graft loss were recorded. The PNF rate was 2.8%, and DGF rate was 28.2%. The 1‐ and 3‐year graft survival was 95.7% and 92.4%. In conclusion, graft survival of DCD kidney transplantation in China is excellent despite of higher rates of PNF and DGF after transplantation.     

Liver Transplantation Using Grafts From Donors After Circulatory Death: A Propensity Score–Matched Study From a Single Center

The use of livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) is increasing, but concerns exist regarding outcomes following use of grafts from “marginal” donors. To compare outcomes in transplants using DCD and donation after brain death (DBD), propensity score matching was performed for 973 patients with chronic liver disease and/or malignancy who underwent primary whole‐liver transplant between 2004 and 2014 at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. Primary end points were overall graft and patient survival. Secondary end points included postoperative, biliary and vascular complications. Over 10 years, 234 transplants were carried out using DCD grafts. Of the 187 matched DCDs, 82.9% were classified as marginal per British Transplantation Society guidelines. Kaplan–Meier analysis of graft and patient survival found no significant differences for either outcome between the paired DCD and DBD patients (p = 0.162 and p = 0.519, respectively). Aspartate aminotransferase was significantly higher in DCD recipients until 48 h after transplant (p < 0.001). The incidences of acute kidney injury and ischemic cholangiopathy were greater in DCD recipients (32.6% vs. 15% [p < 0.001] and 9.1% vs. 1.1% [p < 0.001], respectively). With appropriate recipient selection, the use of DCDs, including those deemed marginal, can be safe and can produce outcomes comparable to those seen using DBD grafts in similar recipients.     

Hemoderivative Transfusion in Liver Transplantation: Comparison Between Recipients of Grafts From Brain Death Donors and Recipients of Uncontrolled Donors After Circulatory Death

IntroductionIntraoperative bleeding during liver transplantation has been correlated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality and decrease in patient and graft survival.Materials and MethodsBetween January 2006 and December 2016 we performed 783 orthotopic liver transplants. After applying exclusion criteria, we found liver grafts from donors after circulatory death (DCD, group A) were used in 69 patients and liver grafts from donors after brain death (group B) were used in 265 patients.ResultsNo difference was found in terms of sex, body mass index, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, indication for transplantation, intensive care unit stay, and Child-Pugh score. The mean transfusion of hemoderivates was as follows: red blood cell 9 (0-28) units in group A vs 6 (0-20) units in group B (P = .004) and fresh frozen plasma 10 (0-29) units in group A vs 9.5 (0-23) in group B (P = .000). The only 2 factors related to massive blood transfusion (>6 units of red blood cell) were uncontrolled DCD condition (odds ratio = 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.31; P = .004), and higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (odds ratio = 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-4.55; P = .001). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 81.3%, 70.2%, and 68.9% in group A vs 89%, 83.7%, and 78% in group B (P = .070).ConclusionThe use of liver grafts from DCDs is associated with increased necessity of transfusion of hemoderivates in comparison with the use of liver grafts from donors after brain death.     

Liver Transplant After Normothermic Regional Perfusion From Controlled Donors After Circulatory Death: The Norwegian Experience

Background

In order to meet the increasing demand for donor organs, the concept of donation after circulatory death (DCD) was reintroduced in Norway, first as a pilot study, followed by the use of DCD as institutional practice. We report the current Norwegian experience with liver transplant after DCD.

Kidney Transplantation Using Elderly Non-Heart-Beating Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Although acceptable outcomes have been reported in both non-heart-beating (NHB) and elderly donors individually, the large pool of elderly NHB donors has not yet been fully utilized. In 1994, we expanded our transplant protocol to include NHB donors aged over 65 years and this study compares the clinical outcomes with regular NHB transplantations. Up to June 2005, 24 patients were transplanted at our center with kidneys from NHB donors aged 65 years or more, whereas 176 patients received grafts from conventional NHB donors during the same period. Grafts from older donors were associated with inferior glomerular filtration rates (29 vs. 44 mL/min after 1 year, p = 0.01) and graft survival (52% vs. 68% after 5 years, p = 0.19) compared to younger NHB donor grafts, although the difference in graft survival was not statistically significant. Exclusion of older NHB donor kidneys with severe vascular pathology resulted in similar graft survival of older and younger NHB donor kidneys. We conclude that the use of elderly NHB donors in order to expand the donor pool was associated with unacceptable clinical outcomes and cannot be justified without further refinement in their selection, for example, by histological assessment of pretransplant biopsies.     

Factors of Acute Kidney Injury Donors Affecting Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) from deceased acute kidney injury (AKI) donors and analyzed the factors affecting these outcomes.MethodsAll patients who underwent KT from deceased donors at our institution from 1998 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Recipients were divided into the AKI and non-AKI donor groups. We analyzed delayed graft function (DGF), serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 1 year after KT, cold ischemia time, donors’ initial and terminal serum creatinine levels, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and patient and graft survival in each group.ResultsOf 181 recipients, 30 received kidneys from 21 AKI donors, whereas the remaining 151 received kidneys from donors without AKI. DGF more frequently developed in the AKI donor group than in the non-AKI donor group (40% vs 7.28%; P = .001). Allograft functions at 1 month and 1 year after KT did not differ between the AKI and non-AKI donor groups (1 month: P = .469; 1 year: P = .691). Factors affecting DGF were recipient weight and donor AKI. Recipient factors affecting graft function at 1 year were recipient height, length of hospital stay, serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 6 months, and biopsy-proven acute rejection. Older donor age was the only donor factor that affected graft function at 1 year.ConclusionKT from deceased AKI donors showed a higher DGF rate but favorable patient and graft survival and graft functions. Donor AKI and recipient weight affected DGF, and only older donor age affected graft function at 1 year.     

Outcome of Renal Transplantation From Deceased Donors After Cardiac Death: A Single-Center Experience From a Developing Country

Background

Limited information is available in the literature about the use of organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) renal transplantation (RTx) from a developing country.

Material and Methods

We report RTx outcome between DCD donors ≥70 years (Group 1; n = 14; mean age, 75.7 ± 5.81) and DCD donors <70 years (Group 2; n = l9; mean age, 51.7 ± 10.1) between January 1999 and January 2012. The mean age of recipients was 39.5 ± 14.7 years, 24 of whom were males. The mean donor age was 61.9 ± 14.6 years, 21 of whom were males. All recipients received single-dose thymoglobulin induction followed by immunosuppression with a steroid, a calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. Statistical analysis used chi-square test and unpaired Student t test. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 3.21 ± 3.46 years, one-, five-, and ten-year, patient survival rates were 77%, 67.4%, and 67.4%, respectively, and death-censored graft survival rates were 85.7% for one, five, and ten years. Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 36.4% (n = 12) with 12.1% (n = 4) biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Patient survival (P = .27), graft survival (P = .20), DGF (P = .51), and BPAR (P = .74) were similar in 2 groups. A total of 27.2% (n = 9) of patients died, mainly due to infections (n = 5).

Conclusion

Given the widespread organ shortage, outcomes of controlled DCD renal transplantation has a potential to expand the donor pool and shorten the waiting list for RTx, encouraging the use of this approach even in low-income countries.     

Donor Hemodynamics as a Predictor of Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

Donation after cardiac death is an important source of transplantable organs, but evidence suggests donor warm ischemia contributes to inferior outcomes. Attempts to predict recipient outcome using donor hemodynamic measurements have not yielded statistically significant results. We evaluated novel measures of donor hemodynamics as predictors of delayed graft function and graft failure in a cohort of 1050 kidneys from 566 donors. Hemodynamics were described using regression line slopes, areas under the curve, and time beyond thresholds for systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure). A logistic generalized estimation equation model showed that area under the curve for systolic blood pressure was predictive of delayed graft function (above median: odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.90). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that slope of oxygen saturation during the first 10 minutes after extubation was associated with graft failure (below median: hazard ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.64), with 5‐year graft survival of 70.0% (95%CI 64.5%–74.8%) for donors above the median versus 61.4% (95%CI 55.5%–66.7%) for those below the median. Among older donors, increased shock index slope was associated with increased hazard of graft failure. Validation of these findings is necessary to determine the utility of characterizing donor warm ischemia to predict recipient outcome.