Prospective evaluation of coagulation activation in pregnant women receiving low-molecular weight heparin

Pregnancy is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) seems to be safe and effective in pregnant women. Normal pregnancy is accompanied by a state of hypercoagulability, indicated by an increase in markers of coagulation activation. In a prospective cohort study, we followed 61 women who received LMWH thromboprophylaxis throughout pregnancy because of a history of VTE, hereditary thrombophilia and/or previous pregnancy-related complications. The control group consisted of 113 healthy pregnant women without antithrombotics. D-Dimer, prothrombin fragment F1+2 (F1+2) and the resistance to activated protein C (APC-ratio) were measured in all women during the first, second and third trimester. Patients and controls did not significantly differ with regard to baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcome. A (recurrent) VTE was seen in one patient despite LMWH. D-Dimer levels significantly increased among patients and controls during pregnancy (p < 0.0001), and were significantly higher among patients compared with the controls (p <0.0001) [395 ng/ml (95% CI 340-458) and 249 ng/ml (95%CI 234-266); 710 ng/ml (95% CI 602-838) and 475 ng/ml (95% CI 431-523); 1089 ng/ml (95% CI 931-1273) and 822 ng/ml (95% CI 741-911); respectively]. Levels of F1+2 significantly increased while the APC-ratio significantly decreased during pregnancy among patients and controls. Despite LMWH, pregnancy is accompanied by a substantial activation of the coagulation system.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy

Thromboembolism is an infrequent, yet serious cause of both maternal and fetal morbidity and death during pregnancy and the puerperium. Pregnancy itself increases the risk of thromboembolic complications probably owing to a combination of hypercoagulability and venous stasis due to venous dilation. Recent studies have indicated that some serious obstetric complications are correlated with inherited or acquired thrombophilia. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been extimated to be 1 per 1000-2000 pregnancies in retrospective studies. Anticoagulant treatment and prophylaxis both before and during pregnancy are based on unfractionated heparin (UH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin. Warfarin is teratogenous if administered between the 6th and the 12th week. LMWH is replacing UH in the prevention and treatment of VTE both outside and more recently during pregnancy with the same indications, and also for obstetric complications. This paper assesses the safety and efficacy of heparin therapy during pregnancy and the puerperium. Its cardiovascular and obstetric indications and regimens and maternal and fetal side-effects are also discussed.     

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in first-degree relatives of patients with venous thromboembolism who have factor V Leiden

The factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation, a genetic abnormality with an autosomal mode of inheritance, is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We aimed to determine the annual incidence of VTE in first-degree relatives of patients with VTE and FVL and to identify factors in patients and the relatives that influence this incidence. In this retrospective and prospective cohort study, the incidence of objectively diagnosed first episodes of VTE was assessed in 553 first-degree relatives of 161 patients with acute VTE and FVL. The annual incidence of VTE was 0.43% (95% CI, 0.3 to 0.56) with FVL and 0.17% (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.27) without FVL (relative risk of 2.5,95% CI, 1.3 to 4.7). A majority (70%) of episodes of VTE were provoked, and this proportion was similar with and without FVL. A larger proportion of VTE was provoked in women (83%) that in men (33%), with the difference accounted for by pregnancy and use of oral contraceptives. The proportion of pregnancies complicated by VTE was 3.9% (95% CI, 2.0-5.8) with FVL and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.04-2.7) without FVL. FVL is associated with a two- to threefold increase in VTE in first-degree relatives of patients with VTE. No subgroup of relatives was identified who require more than routine prophylaxis because of a particularly high risk of VTE.     

High frequency of factor V Leiden in surgical patients with symptomatic venous thromboembolism despite prophylaxis

Among candidate risk factors associated with postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), the role of factorV Leiden (FVL) mutation remains unclear. We performed a case-control study to assess the potential significance of FVL mutation in postoperative VTE cases despite prophylaxis. We used data from the ongoing case-control "EDITH" study. We extracted 133VTE cases and 144 controls who had undergone either surgery or had plaster cast in the previous three months. Prophylaxis adequacy with regard to the recommendations published by the American College of Chest Physicians was retrospectively assessed. FVL mutation was present in 20VTE cases and four controls (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2-18). Prophylaxis was judged as adequate in 116 cases (88.5%) and in 129 controls (87.2%) (p=0.66). The frequency of FVL mutation was not different in VTE cases occurring while on adequate prophylaxis and in VTE cases occurring after the end of adequate prophylaxis (p=0.27). FVL mutation was closely associated with postoperative VTE in patients classified as having received an adequate prophylaxis (8.4; 95% CI, 2.4 to 29). This study shows a close association between the presence of factorV Leiden mutation in symptomatic VTE occurring after surgery despite prophylaxis.     

Thrombophilia, thrombosis and pregnancy

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy is 0.05-1.8%, six times greater than in the non-pregnant state, and pulmonary embolism remains the most common cause of maternal death. Maternal age, previous history of VTE, Caesarean section and the presence of thrombophilia, significantly increase the risk of VTE. Acquired or hereditary thrombophilia occur in almost two-thirds of women presenting with recurrent miscarriages, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, abruptio placentae, or stillbirth, which are associated with microvascular thrombosis in placental blood vessels. Women with VTE during pregnancy and especially those with thrombophilia require individualized management, based on the type of defect, the family history and the presence of additional risk factors. These factors are important in determining the dose and duration of antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy and the puerperium, and the thromboprophylactic strategy for future pregnancies. Oral anticoagulants are now seldom used during pregnancy because of their significant side effects. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are increasingly replacing unfractionated heparin in the prevention and treatment of VTE during pregnancy. LMWHs have also been shown to be effective in improving the outcome of pregnancy in women with previous obstetric complications.     

Inherited thrombophilia and first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium

Venous thromboembolism is a rare but threatening complication of pregnancy. Little conclusive information is available on the actual risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or puerperium in women with inherited thrombophilia, particularly in carriers of factor V Leiden and of the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation. To determine the pregnancy-related and puerperium-related risk of venous thromboembolism in women with inherited thrombophilia, we performed a case-control study on 119 women who had a first episode of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism during pregnancy or puerperium and 232 healthy women who had at least one pregnancy without thrombosis. Inherited thrombophilia was diagnosed in 47 patients (39.5%) and 15 controls (6.5%). The relative risk of venous thromboembolism was 10.6 (95% CI, 5.6-20.4) for heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden, 2.9 (95% CI, 1.0-8.6) for heterozygous carriers of the prothrombin mutation and 13.1 (95% CI, 5.0-34.2) for those with antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiency taken together. Sixty-eight of the 119 women (57%) had thrombosis after delivery, confirming the puerperium as a particularly high-risk period. When women were divided into two groups of those with antenatal or postnatal thrombosis. the relative risks associated with each type of inherited thrombophilia were of similar magnitude. In conclusion, women with inherited thrombophilia have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Among thrombophilic abnormalities, the prothrombin mutation was the weakest risk factor. Thrombosis occurred more frequently in puerperium than in pregnancy, whether or not thrombophilia was diagnosed.     

Low-molecular –weight heparin in pregnancies after ART -A retrospective study-

Introduction

The utility of an antithrombotic prophylaxis in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) is highly debated. It has been hypothesised that specific effects of heparin on the coagulation system during implantation can improve the number of clinical pregnancies and live births.

Materials and Methods

We studied a cohort of 327 women undergone at least 1 ART cycle before thrombophilia testing. Overall, a number of 751 cycles was analysed. Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) and/or low-dose aspirin (ASA) were prescribed in 132 (17.6%) cycles. Furthermore, all the women underwent thrombophilia screening.

Results

The univariate analysis showed that LMWH with/without ASA was significantly associated with both the outcomes clinical pregnancy and live birth, while the use of ASA was not associated with live birth. The logistic regression showed that the use of LMWH was significantly associated with both the outcomes, clinical pregnancy (OR: 6.0, 95%CI: 2.8-15.6) and live birth (OR: 10.7, 95%CI: 3.2-36.1). The type of ART procedure significantly influenced the likelihood of achieving clinical pregnancy.

Conclusions

Present findings suggest that LMWH alone or combined with ASA could have a role in fostering the implantation of embryos and improving the number of live births after ART.     

In families with inherited thrombophilia the risk of venous thromboembolism is dependent on the clinical phenotype of the proband

The utility of laboratory investigation of relatives of individuals with inherited thrombophilia is uncertain. To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among the carriers, we investigated a family cohort of 1,720 relatives of probands with thrombophilia who were evaluated because of VTE (n=1,088), premature arterial thrombosis (n=113), obstetric complication (n=257), or universal screening before pregnancy or hormonal contraception or therapy (n=262); 968 relatives were carriers of thrombophilia. A first deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 44 carriers and 10 non-carriers during 37,688 and 29,548 observation-years from birth, respectively. The risk of DVT among the carriers compared with non-carriers was estimated as a hazard ratio (HR). If the proband had VTE and factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or prothrombin (PT)20210A, the HR for DVT was 2.77 (95%CI 1.21-4.82) in the carriers overall, and 5.54 (95%CI 3.20-187.00) in those homozygous or double heterozygous for FVL and PT20210A. If the proband had VTE and a deficiency of antithrombin (AT), protein C or S, the HR for DVT was 5.14 (95%CI 0.88-10.03) in the carriers overall, and 12.86 (95%CI 2.46-59.90) in those with AT deficiency. No increase in risk was found among the carriers who were relatives of the probands who were evaluated for reasons other than VTE. In conclusion, familial investigation for inherited thrombophilia seems justified for probands with previous VTE, but appears of doubtful utility for the relatives of probands without VTE. This should be taken with caution regarding families with deficiency of natural anticoagulants, given the low number of cases analysed.     

Prolonged travel and venous thromboembolism findings from the RIETE registry

There is a lack of information on clinical risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development following prolonged traveling. Clinical characteristics and additional risk factors for VTE in travelers were analyzed in RIETE, an ongoing registry of patients with symptomatic, confirmed acute VTE. Of 26,172 patients enrolled in RIETE as of May 2009, 2% developed VTE in association with recent traveling. Travelers were ten years younger, had significantly more previous VTE events (20% vs. 16%; OR: 1.4; 95%CI: 1.1-1.7) and their body mass index (BMI) was 28.4 ± 5.1 vs. 27.7 ± 5.2 in other patients from the registry (P = 0.004). 115 (20%) of recent travelers had previous VTE compared to 16% among others patients (OR: 1.4; 95%CI: 1.1-1.7). Recent travelers used hormones significantly more frequently (8.7% vs. 3.7%; OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.8-3.3) and more often had a positive thrombophilia test (16% vs. 8.7%; OR: 2; 95%CI: 1.6-2.6). Travelers used LMWH prophylaxis significantly less frequently than other patients in the registry (2.4% vs. 13%; OR 0.2; 95%CI: 0.1-0.3). There were differences in VTE risk in professional drivers compared to passengers. The current study demonstrates four risk factors for VTE development after long traveling: high BMI, previous VTE, hormone use and thrombophilia. Studies of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy in high risk travelers are warranted.     

Risk stratification and heparin prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in pregnant women

Women with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), thrombophilia or both may be at increased risk of thrombosis during pregnancy, but the optimal management strategy is not well defined in clinical guidelines because of limited trial data. A strategy of risk assessment and heparin prophylaxis was evaluated in pregnant women at increased risk of VTE. In a prospective trial (Efficacy of Thromboprophylaxis as an Intervention during. Gravidity [EThIG]), 810 pregnant women were assigned to one of three management strategies according to pre-defined risk factors related to history of VTE and thrombophilic profile. Low-risk women (group I), received 50-100 IU dalteparin/kg body weight/day for 14 days postpartum, or earlier when additional risk factors occurred. Women at high (group II) or very high risk (group III) received dalteparin from enrollment until six weeks postpartum (50-100 IU and 100-200 IU/kg/day, respectively). Objectively confirmed, symptomatic VTE occurred in 5/810 women (0.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 1.5%) (group I, 0 of 225; II, 3/469; III, 2/116). The rate of serious bleeding was 3.0% (95 % CI, 1.9 to 4.4%); 1.1% (95 % CI, 0.5 to 2.2%) was possibly dalteparin-related. There was no evidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, one case of osteoporosis, and rates of miscarriage and stillbirth were similar to previous, retrospective studies. Risk-stratified heparin prophylaxis was associated with a low incidence of symptomaticVTE and few clinically important adverse events. Antepartum heparin prophylaxis is, therefore, warranted in pregnant women with idiopathic thrombosis or symptomatic thrombophilia.     

Preeclampsia and pregnancy loss in women with a history of venous thromboembolism and prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) during pregnancy

Limited data are available regarding complications of pregnancy and pregnancy outcome under prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in women with a history of thromboembolism (TE). We retrospectively evaluated pregnancy complications in a cohort of 80 women. All had a history of TE (76 venous, two arterial and two venous and arterial) and received prophylactic LMWH during 86 pregnancies. The rate of preeclampsia and stillbirth in these women was compared to that of a control group of 313 women without a history of TE and LMWH. Prophylaxis was started at a median of 10 weeks of gestation and usually continued until six weeks post partum. In 94% of the cases the outcome of pregnancy was favourable with a live birth. Four pregnancies (4.7%) ended in miscarriage. Two (2.3%) pregnancies were complicated by a thromboembolic event (one deep leg vein thrombosis and PRIND, respectively). One patient developed HELLP-syndrome. Severe preeclampsia occurred in three (3.8%) and stillbirth in one (1.3%) of the patients (n = 80), whereas this was the case in four (1.3%, odds ratio 3.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-13.73, p = 0.15) and 10 (3.2%, OR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.05-3.04, p = 0.72) control women. Mean birth weight and standard deviation of infants was 3,160 +/- 930 g in patients and 3,300 +/- 540 g in controls (p = 0.11). We conclude that a favourable pregnancy outcome in women with a history of thromboembolism who use prophylactic LMWH during pregnancy can be expected. There was a trend towards a higher risk of preeclampsia, and these women should be carefully monitored for this complication.     

Screening for thrombophilia and antithrombotic prophylaxis in pregnancy: Guidelines of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET)

The term thrombophilia describes an increased tendency to develop thrombosis and many laboratory markers with different strengths of association with thrombosis have been identified. The main causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in developed countries is venous thromboembolism (VTE) and obstetric complications. During pregnancy and puerperium the risk for VTE increases due to hemostatic imbalance towards a prothrombotic state, and it is further increased in women carriers of thrombophilia; recent studies have also demonstrated an association between thrombophilia and obstetric complications. These complications are, therefore, considered potentially preventable with the prophylactic administration of anticoagulant drugs, although their efficacy is not proven by data from randomized controlled trials. After a systematic comprehensive literature review and using a rigorous methodology, the expert panel formulated recommendations regarding the usefulness of screening for thrombophilia in pregnancy to identify high-risk women and for the management of antithrombotic prophyalxis. When evidence is lacking, consensus-based recommendations are provided.     

The incidence and risk factors of recurrent venous thromboembolism during pregnancy

Introduction

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy is a challenging topic with relatively few publications. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and the risk factors of recurrent antepartum VTE in women with a history of at least one previous VTE episode.

Materials and Methods

This observational cohort study involved 270 pregnant women (369 pregnancies) with at least one previous episode of VTE. The risk factors of recurrent antepartum VTE were identified by using group A (women without recurrent venous thromboembolism VTE) as a control group for group B (women with recurrent VTE despite LMWH (low molecular weight heparin) prophylaxis) and C (women with VTE recurrence in early pregnancy before the planned initiation of LMWH prophylaxis).

Results and Conclusions

The incidence of recurrent VTE was 7.6% (n = 28).Twelve recurrent VTEs in ten women (3.3%) developed during early pregnancy before initiation of LMWH and sixteen recurrent VTEs (4.3%) developed in 15 women despite LMWH prophylaxis.In women with recurrent antepartum VTE, the incidence of a history of two or more previous VTEs (group A vs. B: 5.7% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.001; group A vs. C: 5.7% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.022), previous VTE in connection with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (group A vs. B: 2.6% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.012) and a history of VTE related to hormonal risk factors (group A vs. B: 60.4% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.011) was significantly higher compared to those with successful LMWH-prophylaxis. The percentage of the women with long-term anticoagulation was also significantly higher among the women with recurrent antepartum VTE (group A vs. B: 7.6% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001) compared to those with successful LMWH-prophylaxis. The risk of antepartum recurrent VTE is considerable in women with a history of two or more previous VTEs, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome or long-term anticoagulation. The antepartum prophylaxis with prophylactic dose of LMWH or even with intermediate dose of LMWH might not be sufficient in this high-risk population.     

A comparative double-blind, randomised trial of a new second generation LMWH (bemiparin) and UFH in the prevention of post-operative venous thromboembolism. The Bemiparin Assessment group

A randomised, prospective, double-blind trial was performed, to compare the safety and efficacy of a new low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) Bemiparin and standard unfractionated heparin (UFH), for the prophylaxis of postoperative venous thromboembolism. 300 patients scheduled to undergo elective hip arthroplasty were included. The principal outcome measures were the incidence of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. 149 patients received 3,500 anti-Xa IU of bemiparin plus a placebo injection daily and 149 patients received 5,000 IU of UFH twice a day. The two groups were similar with respect to factors likely to affect the risk of developing post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and risk of bleeding events. During the post-operative period, 34 patients developed VTE complications; 9 (7.2%) in the bemiparin group and 25 (18.7%) in the UFH group. VTE in the two groups was statistically significant (OR of 2.96; 95% CI 1.32-6.62 and p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the frequency of bleeding complications: major bleeding requiring discontinuation of prophylaxis, (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.36-4.05; p = 1.00), the measured median operative blood loss (p = 0.77) or the median postoperative drain loss (p = 0.97), and the number of patients who developed wound haematoma (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.31-2.46; p = 1.00). A comparison of coagulation parameters on the preoperative day with post-operative day 2 +/- 1, day 6 +/- 1 and day of discharge showed a significantly higher AT concentration, anti-factor Xa activity and TFPI levels in the bemiparin group when compared with UFH. This study demonstrates that bemiparin, in a single daily subcutaneous dose of 3,500 anti-Xa IU in high risk patients undergoing hip arthroplasty is more effective than UFH administered twice daily at a dose of 5,000 IU in the prevention of postoperative VTE. Both agents are equally safe.     

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation in children with venous thromboembolism

To determine whether factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (PT20210A) are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Argentinean children. One hundred and thirty consecutive children with VTE were prospectively assisted at a single centre. Blood samples were available from 110 of them for detailed haematological analysis. The prevalence of both mutations was compared with a control group. The odds ratio for VTE was significantly increased in patients with FVL (OR 3.64; 95% CI: 1.14-11.6, p < 0.029) whereas odds ratio for VTE was not significantly increased in patients with PT20210A (OR 1.06; 95% CI: 0.24-4.73, p = 0.938). Combined disorders were found in 5 of the 10 children with the aforementioned mutations. In 21 children (19%) without these mutations other inherited and acquired disorders were detected. Our data show that FVL is a risk factor for VTE whereas PT20210A does not seem to be a risk factor in our paediatric population.     

Maternal smoking, obesity, and risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based nested case-control study

BACKGROUND: Smoking and obesity are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between smoking, obesity (BMI>30), and risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and the puerperium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a population-based case-control study nested within a Danish cohort of 71,729 women, we identified 129 cases with VTE in pregnancy or the puerperium, and 258 pregnant non-VTE controls. We obtained data from medical records regarding current smoking status, BMI, and other covariates, and computed the odds ratios (OR) for VTE as a measure of relative risk. RESULTS: Smoking and obesity were associated with increased risk of VTE during pregnancy and the puerperium (adjusted OR 2.7 (95% CI: 1.5, 4.9) and 5.3 (95% CI: 2.1, 13.5), respectively). Obesity appeared to be associated with a higher risk of pulmonary embolism (adjusted OR: 14.9 (95% CI: 3.0, 74.8) than of deep venous thrombosis (adjusted OR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.6, 11.9). CONCLUSION: Smoking and obesity are risk factors for VTE in pregnancy and the puerperium.     

What is the optimal pharmacological prophylaxis for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with acute ischemic stroke?

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with a high in-hospital mortality. The benefit from pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is uncertain probably due to doubts about the optimal agent and dose. We evaluated the benefit/risk ratio of different anticoagulant regimens in the prevention of VTE in patients with AIS. METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to January 2005. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing early administration of either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) with control were included. Endpoints were objectively diagnosed deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and extracranial hemorrhage (ECH). Low-dose UFH was arbitrarily defined as < or =15,000 IU/day, low-dose LMWH as < or =6000 IU/day or weight-adjusted dose of < or =86 IU/kg/day. RESULTS: Sixteen trials involving 23,043 patients with AIS met the inclusion criteria. The number of events was small and different doses of anticoagulant treatment were used. Compared to control, high-dose UFH was associated with a reduction in pulmonary embolism (OR=0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.29-0.83), but also with an increased risk of ICH (OR=3.86, 95% CI=2.41-6.19) and ECH (OR=4.74, 95% CI=2.88-7.78). Low-dose UFH decreased the thrombosis risk (OR=0.17, 95% CI=0.11-0.26), but had no influence on pulmonary embolism (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.53-1.31); the risk of ICH or ECH was not statistically significant increased (OR=1.67, 95% CI=0.97-2.87 for ICH; and OR=1.58, 95% CI=0.89-2.81 for ECH, respectively). High-dose LMWH decreased both DVT (OR=0.07, 95% CI=0.02-0.29) and pulmonary embolism (0.44, 95% CI=0.18-1.11), but this benefit was offset by an increased risk for ICH (OR=2.01, 95% CI=1.02-3.96) and ECH (OR=1.78, 95% CI=0.99-3.17). Low-dose LMWH reduced the incidence of both DVT (OR=0.34, 95% CI=0.19-0.59) and pulmonary embolism (OR=0.36, 95% CI=0.15-0.87), without an increased risk of ICH (OR=1.39, 95% CI=0.53-3.67) or ECH (OR=1.44, 95% CI=0.13-16). For low-dose LMWH, the numbers needed to treat were 7 and 38 for DVT and pulmonary embolism, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect comparison of low and high doses of UFH and LMWH suggests that low-dose LMWH have the best benefit/risk ratio in patients with acute ischemic stroke by decreasing the risk of both DVT and pulmonary embolism, without a clear increase in ICH or ECH.     

The effect of dalteparin on coagulation activation during pregnancy in women with thrombophilia. A randomized trial

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is increasingly being used for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prevention of pregnancy associated morbidity in pregnant women with thrombophilia. We sought to determine if the administration of prophylactic doses of LMWH downregulates coagulation activation in high risk pregnant women with thrombophilia. This sub-study was planned as part of a randomized open label controlled trial (Thrombophilia in Pregnancy Prophylaxis Study [TIPPS]) in which patients at high risk of pregnancy complications with confirmed thrombophilia are randomized to receive either dalteparin (5,000 units/day until 20 weeks then 5,000 units q12h until 37 weeks or onset of labor) or no treatment. Blood samples were collected at baseline, day 7-9 (after starting study drug), week 20 (before increasing study drug), week 36 (prior to stopping study drug) and at the time of admission to the labor and delivery unit. Samples were not drawn at fixed times in relation to drug injection. These samples were analyzed for levels of thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (F1.2), D-dimer and anti-Xa activity. Generalized linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis and model results were controlled for age, smoking status, type of thrombophilia and predisposing risk factors. The effect of dalteparin on TAT levels was defined as the primary outcome. Of 198 patients eligible, 114 were enrolled in TIPPS. Ninety-one were eligible for the TIPPS coagulation activation sub-study and randomized. Thirty-nine patients were analyzed in the treatment group (dalteparin) and 46 patients in the control group (no intervention). Levels of coagulation activation factors F1.2, TAT and D-dimer increased significantly throughout pregnancy in both groups (p < 0.0001). Dalteparin prophylaxis resulted in a significant increase in anti-Xa activity through pregnancy (p < 0.0001) compared to controls. Dalteparin had no significant effects on the levels of TAT, F1.2 and D-dimer throughout pregnancy in thrombophilic women. A post-hoc Monte Carlo power analysis revealed that our study had 100% and 88% power to detect reductions in TAT values on treatment of 50% and 25%, respectively. Prophylaxis with dalteparin at doses used in this study did not reduce coagulation activation in high risk thrombophilic women during pregnancy.     

Thrombophilia and pregnancy loss

A large body of evidence obtained during the past 6 years suggests a significant role for inherited thrombophilia in the development of gestational vascular complications. While the majority of women with thrombophilia will have an uneventful gestation, case-control studies have demonstrated that thrombophilia is more prevalent in cohorts of women with pregnancy loss early onset preeclampsia, placental abruption, and severe intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR).Placental pathological findings in women with thrombophilia are hallmarked by thrombosis and fibrin deposition potentially to a greater degree than in normal pregnancy. Preliminary case-control studies suggest a benefit for prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), and prospective randomized trials are in progress to define whether LMWH are effective in preventing pregnancy loss in women with thrombophilia and previous fetal wastage.     

Evaluation of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with Factor V Leiden mutation in heterozygous form

Introduction

To evaluate the risk for recurrence after first venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with or without Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation.

Materials and Methods

A prospective population based study of 1465 consecutive unselected VTE patients was performed at Skåne University Hospital 1998-2008. The VTE was objectively verified and the patients answered questionnaire and left blood samples for evaluation.

Results

Out of 1465 patients (721[49%] men and 744[51%] women) thrombophilia data were available for 1267, and FVL mutation was found in heterozygous form in 339 (27). The homozygous form and prothrombin mutation (PTM) were much less common. Patients were followed during 4.8 ± 2.3 years (total 6133 patient years) and recurrence after first VTE (evaluated in 1108 patients) occurred in 131 (12%, 95%CI 10-14%), where of 49(37%) had heterozygous FVL mutation and 57(44%) were without thrombophilia. The remaining 25(19%) patients had either PTM, FVL in homozygous form, compound PTM/FVL or unknown thrombophilia status. Having FVL mutation in heterozygous form significantly increased the risk for VTE recurrence (odds ratio 2.4 (95 %CI 1.6-3.6; p < 0.01). In a Kaplan-Meier analysis the FVL group also differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the other patients concerning time to recurrence (almost 25% vs. 10% after 8 years).

Conclusions

FVL mutation in heterozygous form is common among VTE patients and significantly increases the risk for VTE recurrence.