Are Plain Radiographs Sufficient to Exclude Cervical Spine Injuries in Low-Risk Adults?

Background

The routine use of clinical decision rules and three-view plain radiography to clear the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients has been recently called into question.

Clinical Question

In low-risk adult blunt trauma patients, can plain radiographs adequately exclude cervical spine injury when clinical prediction rules cannot?

Evidence Review

Four observational studies investigating the performance of plain radiographs in detecting cervical spine injury in low-risk adult blunt trauma patients were reviewed.

Conclusion

The consistently poor performance of plain radiographs to rule out cervical spine injury in adult blunt trauma victims is concerning. Large, rigorously performed prospective trials focusing on low- or low/moderate-risk patients will be needed to truly define the utility of plain radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.     

Evaluation of neck discomfort, neck tenderness, and neurologic deficits as indicators for radiography in blunt trauma victims.

Seventeen of 480 adult blunt trauma victims who sustained cervical spine injuries (CSI) were studied prospectively. In reliable patients, complaints of neck discomfort and tenderness demonstrated sensitivities of 86% and 79%, respectively, for CSI. A positive physical examination, defined as neurologic deficits, or cervical region discomfort or tenderness was noted in 13 of 14 reliable individuals sustaining CSI (sensitivity 93%, specificity 16%, positive predictive value 3.3%, negative predictive value 98.7%). Lack of absolute sensitivity of these studied clinical parameters, either singly or in concert, for CSI suggests that eliminating cervical spine radiography on the basis of the absence of neck discomfort, tenderness, or neurological deficits in reliable blunt trauma victims could result in missed CSI. An enormous prospective data base will be required to definitively address the sensitivity of all clinical parameters currently employed to determine the need for cervical spine radiography in reliable blunt trauma victims.     

The usefulness of a modified adult protocol for the clearance of paediatric cervical spine injury in the emergency department

Objective: To determine if the use of a modified adult protocol that uses cervical spine imaging on presentation for the assessment of cervical spine injury in children improves clinical outcome. Methods: This is a case series study on all consecutive trauma patients presenting from April to July 2000 inclusive to the ED of a major paediatric trauma hospital. Children presenting to the ED with potential cervical spine injury (CSI) were identified using standard selection criteria. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, method and time of presentation, associated injuries, radiological investigation and clinical outcome were recorded. The major outcome measures for this study were: time to clearance of the cervical spine, length of stay in the ED and admission to an in‐hospital bed. Data were analysed for compliance to the protocol, this being the standard assessment pathway of cervical spine clearance used by our trauma service. Results: The trauma registry identified 1721 trauma presentations during the 4‐month study period; 208 presentations representing 200 children with potential CSI were entered into the study. Males represented 72.5% of the study population, having a mean age of 8.32 years, although 29% were less than 5 years of age. The majority of presentations (69%) occurred outside of normal working hours. In 17.8% of cases the cervical spine was cleared based on clinical assessment alone, half less than 5 years of age. Compliance to the protocol occurred in 78% of presentations. However, when examined by age group, children 5 years of age or above were 1.5 times more likely to comply with the protocol as compared with younger children. Adequate plain imaging was not obtained in 18% of presentations, this group almost exclusively less than 5 years of age. There were no missed injuries and no short or long‐term neurological sequelae reported during this study. There were no differences in time to clearance, length of stay and admission rate between compliant and non‐compliant groups. Conclusions: Modified adult protocols for cervical spine clearance offer guidance in managing the majority of children suffering blunt trauma. However, we recommend caution in rigidly applying such protocols, especially to children of young age.     

Is the anteroposterior cervical spine radiograph necessary in initial trauma screening?

The usefulness of the anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the cervical spine in contributing to the diagnosis of cervical spine injuries in the acute trauma patient was examined in a retrospective study. All cases of cervical spine fracture or dislocation seen at a level I trauma center over a 3-year period and at a rehabilitation center over a 10-year period were reviewed. The lateral radiograph, open-mouth odontoid radiograph, and AP radiograph of each case were sequentially examined by a neuroradiologist (blinded to the original diagnosis) to determine the contribution of each view in making a diagnosis of cervical spine injury. Results of these reviews showed that there were no cases of cervical spine injury evident on the AP view without an obvious corresponding abnormality on the lateral or open-mouth view. It was concluded that the AP view could be dropped from the initial screening radiographic study of the cervical spine in the trauma patient. Only an adequate lateral view and open-mouth odontoid view would then be necessary to initially evaluate the cervical spine in the trauma patient, and decisions to obtain further studies could be based safely on only the lateral and open-mouth views.     

Evaluation of the acute cervical spine: a management algorithm. (Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY) J Trauma 2000;49:450–456.

A retrospective review was initiated of all trauma patients evaluated in a Level I trauma center the year before and after implementation of a new cervical spine protocol to determine the incidence of missed cervical injuries. An additional 6 months were reviewed to detect any missed injuries late in the study period. During the 2‐year study period, 4,460 patients presented to the emergency room with some form of cervical spine precautions. Blunt trauma comprised 90% of the study population. According to the protocol, approximately 45% required further cervical radiographs after presentation. In the preprotocol year, 77 of 2,217 (3.4%) patients were diagnosed with cervical spine injuries, 16 of 77 (21%) with multiple level injuries, and 25 of 77 (32%) with neurologic compromise. Three of 2,217 patient had missed cervical spine injuries on their initial evaluations. In the postprotocol year, 84 of 2,243 (3.4%) patients had cervical injuries, 25 of 84 (30%) with multiple levels of injuries and 28 of 84 (28%) with neurologic compromise. No patient evaluated during the protocol year was missed. All statistics between the two groups were not significant. Conclude the current protocol by risk stratifying patients on presentation is effective in assessing patients for cervical spine injuries. Comment by Gabor B. Racz, M.D. This is a retrospective review from a Level I trauma center a year before and after implantation of a cervical spine injury protocol. The comparison of outcomes before and after the protocol was rather similar in that the diagnosis of cervical spine injury in 77 of 2,217 patients, or 3.4% and 84 of 2,243 had cervical injuries again 3.4%. Prior to the initiation of the protocol, the first year had three cervical spine injuries missed, which were diagnosed later secondary to continued neck pain on reevaluation. There were no missed cases after the protocol. The evaluation and examination go hand in hand. More emphasis is placed on the clinical exam and plain multiple view x‐ray films and adherence to limiting the rigid collar to 6 h switching over to soft collar and developing more of a confidence in the clinical exam rather than to concentrate on the more expensive and time consuming radiological diagnostic procedures. The cervical algorithm does work and it is impressive that there were no missed injuries. It is recommended that physicians working in a Level I trauma center should go and review the algorithm in detail. The recommended practice is to rely on plain films first if there is persistent pain flexion and extension films and involvement of appropriate consultants in these patients who must be assumed to have cervical spine injury.     

Incidence of cervical spine injuries in association with blunt head trauma

To establish an incidence of cervical spine injuries in significant blunt head trauma and to evaluate the necessity of using cervical radiography, all consecutive cases of blunt head trauma admitted to the trauma service over a 7-month period were reviewed. Two hundred twenty-eight charts were reviewed for demographic information, circumstance of injury, complaints and physical findings referable to the cervical spine, presenting level of consciousness, severity of head injury, and cervical spine radiographic findings. Only three patients were found to have cervical spine injuries, for an incidence of 1.7%. Of the 122 alert and asymptomatic patients, none had cervical spine injury. The patient population was defined, yet the very low incidence of cervical spine injuries associated with blunt head trauma in this study precludes any identification of predictors. Nevertheless, the results suggest that alert and asymptomatic patients can be spared cervical spine radiography.     

Cervical injury in head trauma

Criteria for excluding cervical spine injury in patients who have sustained blunt head or neck trauma were prospectively studied at four hospitals in the Chicago area. The authors attempted to define a subset of these adult patients who, based on clinical criteria, could reliably be excluded from cervical spine radiography, thus avoiding unnecessary radiation and saving considerable time and money in their evaluation. Patients fell into four groups: (1) patients who were awake, alert, and had no complaint of neck pain or tenderness on physical examination; (2) patients who were awake, alert, but had complaint of neck pain or tenderness on physical examination laterally over the trapezius muscle only; (3) patients who were awake, alert, but had complaint of central neck pain or tenderness on physical examination over the cervical spine or center of the neck; and (4) patients who were not fully awake or alert, were clinically intoxicated, had other painful or distracting injuries, or had focal neurologic findings. Patients in group 4 had significantly more fractures (21/387) when compared with all other patients (7/478). Patients with central neck pain or tenderness (group 3) had significantly more fractures (7/237) than patients without pain or tenderness or with these findings limited to the trapezius area (0/236). It is clear that patients who have altered mental status, abnormal examination findings, distracting injury, or pain or tenderness over the cervical spine must have cervical spine radiographs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Emergency department intubation of trauma patients with undiagnosed cervical spine injury

Objectives: Some trauma patients have an undiagnosed cervical spine injury but require immediate airway control. This paper reports an emergency department''s (ED) experience with these patients. In particular, is there a worse neurological outcome? Methods: A retrospective study over 6.5 years, based on prospectively collected data from the Royal Perth Hospital trauma registry. Patients with a cervical spine injury were identified and clinical data were abstracted. The primary outcome measure was evidence of exacerbation of cervical spine injury as a result of intubation by ED medical staff. Results: 308 patients (1.9%) of the 15 747 trauma patients were intubated by ED medical staff. Thirty seven (12%) were subsequently verified to have a cervical spine injury, of which 36 were managed with orotracheal intubation. Twenty five (69%) survived to have a meaningful post-intubation neurological examination. Fourteen (56%) of these 25 patients had an unstable cervical spine injury. Ninety per cent of all ED intubations were by ED medical staff. No worsening of neurological outcomes occurred. Conclusions: Every ninth trauma patient that this ED intubates has a cervical spine injury. Intubation by ED medical staff did not worsen neurological outcome. In the controlled setting of an ED staffed by senior practitioners, patients with undiagnosed cervical spine injury can be safely intubated.     

General principles governing radiological examinations in cervical spine injuries

A review of the general principles governing radiological procedures in cases of acute trauma to the cervical spine, depending on the patient's clinical status, and on the location and nature of the injury. Various X-ray techniques are presented that can be used to attain better differentiation of the sequelae of spinal injury, along with a general assessment of the clinical value of certain other examinations, such as computer tomography and magnetic resonance, in terms of their suitability in cases of acute trauma to the cervical spine.     

Principles of prehospital care of musculoskeletal injuries

Prehospital management of musculoskeletal injuries in the traumatized patient is based on the application of a few basic principles in an orderly but expeditious manner. The patient must be assessed for immediate life-threatening conditions involving airway, respiratory, and circulatory functions while the cervical spine is protected. Resuscitative efforts to reestablish and preserve an adequate circulating volume of oxygenated blood must follow, using airways, oxygen therapy, and fluid replacement through MAST trousers and intravenous fluids. Cardiac function must be maintained as well. Respiratory function must be monitored and assisted as required. Finally, neurologic status must be assessed and monitored. Secondary assessment of all pertinent history and physical findings is made to delineate all other injuries that do not pose an immediate threat to the life or limb of the patient. Definitive care follows but is limited to basic resuscitation, stabilization, and immobilization techniques under medical control through telemetry and radio communication. Immediate definitive care of the traumatized patient requires the expeditious intervention of the trauma team in a hospital setting with surgical, blood banking, radiographic, laboratory, and other hospital-based capabilities available. Field management of the traumatized patient is directed at the expeditious delivery of the viable patient to the trauma team. In the multiply traumatized patient with severe injuries to several organ systems, prehospital care may need to be expedited to provide this patient the in-hospital care required to save his or her life. Appropriate treatment in such life-threatening trauma situations will consist of a rapid primary assessment, airway and cervical spine control, appropriate respiratory and cardiovascular assistance, gross whole body fracture immobilization using a backboard, and immediate transport. For less severely injured patients, primary assessment, resuscitation, stabilization, full secondary assessment, initial definitive care, and immobilization should be completed before transport begins.     

Unsuspected upper cervical spine fractures associated with significant head trauma: role of CT

Several recent studies report the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) to be far greater than that of traditional plain film radiographic studies for evaluation of cervical spine fractures and spinal cord pathology. Nevertheless, plain films continue to be the standard screening examination. CT is used only if fractures are demonstrated or suspected on plain film survey. Recently, three patients with significant head and neck trauma (all three patients had intracranial hemorrhage) had cervical spine evaluation by computed tomography and standard plain film views. CT demonstrated significant C1-C2 fractures, while plain films were completely normal in all three cases. Prospectively studying the next 50 patients with significant head trauma, we added a few more slices to the routine head scan protocol to cover the first three cervical vertebrae. This added very little time or cost to the procedure. The additional CT images demonstrated four upper cervical fractures that could not be seen on plain films, even in retrospect. Our findings suggest that routine inclusion of the upper cervical spine with head CT is appropriate in the evaluation of patients with significant head trauma as defined by intracranial hemorrhage or skull fracture.     

The management of patients with spinal cord injury

Few diseases or injuries have greater potential for causing death or having a devastating impact on a person's quality of life than cervical spine trauma. All patients admitted to hospital after significant trauma must therefore be assumed to have a potentially unstable spinal fracture until it is proven otherwise, to prevent their sustaining further injury owing to inappropriate management. It is vital that nurses are familiar with the signs and symptoms of such injuries and aware of the appropriate management techniques.     

New Immobilization Guidelines Change EMS Critical Thinking in Older Adults With Spine Trauma

Objective: The impact of immobilization techniques on older adult trauma patients with spinal injury has rarely been studied. Our advisory group implemented a change in the immobilization protocol used by emergency medical services (EMS) professionals across a region encompassing 9 trauma centers and 24 EMS agencies in a Rocky Mountain state using a decentralized process on July 1, 2014. We sought to determine whether implementing the protocol would alter immobilization methods and affect patient outcomes among adults ≥60 years with a cervical spine injury. Methods: This was a 4-year retrospective study of patients ≥60 years with a cervical spine injury (fracture or cord). Immobilization techniques used by EMS professionals, patient demographics, injury characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes were compared before (1/1/12–6/30/14) and after (7/1/14–12/31/15) implementation of the Spinal Precautions Protocol using bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Of 15,063 adult trauma patients admitted to nine trauma centers, 7,737 (51%) were ≥60 years. Of those, 237 patients had cervical spine injury and were included in the study; 123 (51.9%) and 114 (48.1%) were transported before and after protocol implementation, respectively. There was a significant shift in the immobilization methods used after protocol implementation, with less full immobilization (59.4% to 28.1%, p < 0.001) and an increase in the use of both a cervical collar only (8.9% to 27.2%, p < 0.001) and not using any immobilization device (15.5% to 31.6%, p = 0.003) after protocol implementation. While the proportion of patients who only received a cervical collar increased after implementing the Spinal Precautions Protocol, the overall proportion of patients who received a cervical collar alone or in combination with other immobilization techniques decreased (72.4% to 56.1%, p = 0.01). The presence of a neurological deficit (6.5% vs. 5.3, p = 0.69) was similar before and after protocol implementation; in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.24–1.30, p = 0.18) was similar post–protocol implementation after adjusting for injury severity. Conclusions: There were no differences in neurologic deficit or patient disposition in the older adult patient with cervical spine trauma despite changes in spinal restriction protocols and resulting differences in immobilization devices.     

Cervical spine imaging in trauma patients: a simple scheme of rationalising arm traction using zonal divisions of the vertebral bodies.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the effectiveness of arm traction for cervical spine imaging in trauma patients and devise a scheme to predict the probability of visualising the C7/T1 level in trauma patients. METHODS--98 trauma patients were studied. Each vertebral body was divided into three equal horizontal zones, the disc space between vertebral bodies being equivalent to one zone. The fifth cervical vertebra was used as the starting level (zone 1). Zones obtained pre and post arm traction on the lateral cervical spine radiographs were recorded. Results were analysed to show the probability of imaging the lower cervical spine, including the cervico-thoracic junction. RESULTS--If the initial film showed less than zone 10 (mid-C7 vertebra), the probability of showing zone 13 (upper body of T1) with arm traction was only 7.7%, that is, one success in every 13 pulls; or conversely, 12 failures in every 13 pulls. CONCLUSIONS--Unless an initial cervical spine radiograph includes the upper one third of the body of the C7 vertebra, the probability of attaining the C7/T1 level with arm traction is < 15%. It is suggested that all initial radiographs of the lateral cervical spine in major trauma patients be done with arm traction, and where the upper one third of the body of C7 vertebra is not seen, then computerised tomography, swimmer's, or oblique views be considered.     

Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in blunt cervical trauma

Objectives: To determine whether MRI of the cervical spine resulted in a change in management of patients with blunt trauma and normal plain X‐ray (XR)/CT of the cervical spine. Methods: An explicit chart review was conducted of patients seen at a Level 1 trauma centre over a 1 year period. Clinical details were extracted from the charts of patients with blunt trauma who had a normal plain XR and CT scan of the cervical spine and who underwent cervical spine MRI. A comparison of clinical details was made between those with a normal/abnormal MRI secondary to the acute injury. Results: One hundred and thirty‐four patients met entry criteria. Discharge non‐operative management of the cervical spine was associated with a change in management by the MRI result (P < 0.0001) where MRI of the cervical spine occurred a median of 3 days (interquartile range 0–4.5, range 0–137) after the injury. The MRI occurred before discharge 90% of the time in both groups. Operative management occurred in three patients and was delayed until after first outpatient review in two patients. Conclusions: An abnormal MRI after normal plain XR and CT cervical spine studies resulted in a change in non‐operative management at discharge. Early MRI resulted in one patient receiving surgery before discharge. No unstable injuries were detected by MRI that were not evident on plain XR or CT cervical spine.     

Cervical spine injury in low-impact blunt trauma

Few data are available regarding the incidence of cervical spine injuries following relatively low-impact blunt trauma. This prospective level II trauma center study of low-impact blunt trauma found a 1.30% incidence of cervical spine injury. Impressive differences were found in such parameters as population characteristics, modes of injury, elapsed times to emergency department evaluation, and Revised Trauma Scores between this study group and those reported in prospective level I high-impact blunt trauma series. Cervical spine injury in low-impact blunt trauma is significant and often presents less than dramatically, thus emphasizing a need for maintaining a high index of suspicion at all times.     

Imaging of cervical spine trauma

The cervical spine, supporting such critical structures as the medulla, spinal cord, and cervical nerve roots, can be very challenging to image propertly because of its complex structural anatomy and superimposition of bony and soft tissue parts. In this article, the use and value of the various modalities that image the cervical spine are discussed. Plain radiography remains the best screening tool in the initial evaluation of the cervical spine after trauma. Additional views, such as swimmer's, pillar and lateral flexion, and extension, often are helpful in certain circumstances.     

Cervical spine injuries in blunt trauma patients requiring emergent endotracheal intubation.

Airway management in the blunt trauma patient is complicated by the potential for causing or exacerbating an injury to the cervical cord if an unstable cervical fracture is present. The records of 987 blunt trauma patients who required emergent endotracheal intubation over a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed to determine the incidence and type of cervical spine injury and the incidence of injury based on airway management. Sixty of the patients (6.1%) had a cervical fracture; 53 were potentially unstable injuries by radiographic criteria. Twenty patients had neurologic deficits prior to intubation. Twenty-six patients with unstable injuries were intubated orally, 25 nasally, and two by cricothyrotomy. One patient developed a neurologic deficit after nasotracheal intubation. Because of a possible selection bias in which severely injured patients were preferentially referred to this trauma center, the true incidence of cervical spine injuries may be lower than the 6.1% we found. The authors conclude that the incidence of serious cervical spine injury in a very severely injured population of blunt trauma patients is relatively low, and that commonly used methods of precautionary airway management rarely lead to neurologic deterioration.     

Radiologic triage of the multiply-injured patient

Integration of the principles of triage in the radiographic assessment of the trauma victim should allow efficient and timely diagnosis of most serious injuries. Use of the portable apparatus is stressed as the initial approach, but caution must be exercised in the exclusion of significant injuries by this method. Careful reading of additional information on films taken for a primary reason may allow the early diagnosis of associated problems (e.g., evaluating the upper airway on cervical spine views and the diaphragms on a chest film). Close cooperation between the emergency physician and radiologist is important in order to obtain the highest diagnostic accuracy in caring for victims of multiple trauma.     

Dysphagia due to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis

Although diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis generally affects the lumbar spine, any segment of the spine may be involved. When the cervical spine is affected, dysphagia may occur. Diabetes mellitus is commonly present. A history of previous cervical trauma is an indication to obtain cervical spine radiographs. Barium swallow and endoscopy provide confirmation of etiology. Surgery is curative.