Pilot Randomized Study of Early Tacrolimus Withdrawal from a Regimen with Sirolimus Plus Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation

We performed a randomized trial to compare two regimens of low-risk kidney allograft recipients in the first year after transplantation. Both regimens initially included sirolimus, tacrolimus and steroids; one with long-term maintenance with these drugs vs. tacrolimus withdrawal. Group I: sirolimus levels of 4-8 ng/mL, plus tacrolimus 8-12 ng/mL for 3 months, and 5-10 ng/mL after month 3. Group II: sirolimus concentration of 8-16 ng/mL, plus tacrolimus 3-8 ng/mL with tacrolimus elimination from month 3 onwards. Owing to difficulties in achieving target levels, the protocol was amended to increase the doses. Eighty-seven patients were recruited. In the intention-to-treat analysis, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 12 months, adjusted to zero for graft loss, was similar in both groups (58.8 and 59.9 mL/min). Analysis of patients remaining on protocol showed that GFR was higher in group II only in the patients postamendment (58.4 and 72.9 mL/min, p = 0.03). Rates of biopsy-confirmed rejection (BCAR) were 9.3% and 22.7% in groups I and II, respectively (p = NS). After amendment, BCAR rates were 10.3% and 11.1% (p = NS). Diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in patients who eliminated tacrolimus (80.4 vs. 75.6 mmHg) (p = 0.03). Combining sirolimus and tacrolimus with adequate loading doses was associated with a low incidence of BCAR, and allowed tacrolimus elimination in a high proportion of patients, which may be followed by amelioration in renal function and blood pressure.     

Tacrolimus Combined with Two Different Dosages of Sirolimus in Kidney Transplantation: Results of a Multicenter Study

Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective regimen in kidney transplantation. This study compared the efficacy of combining tacrolimus and two different dosages of sirolimus with an established tacrolimus-MMF regimen. Each day in addition to tacrolimus, 325 patients received 2 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL2 mg), 325 patients received 0.5 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 327 patients 1 g MMF (TAC-MMF). The initial tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg/day. Sirolimus patients received loading doses of 6 or 1.5 mg, and daily doses of 2 or 0.5 mg thereafter. Steroid administration was identical for all groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (15.7%) compared with the TAC-SRL0.5 mg (25.2%, p = 0.003) and the TAC-MMF groups (22.3%, p = 0.036). Six-month graft survival was 91.0% (TAC-SRL2 mg), 92.6% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 92.4% (TAC-MMF); the respective values for patient survival were 98.1%, 97.8% and 97.9%. Thirty-four patients (10.5%), 19 patients (5.8%) and 16 patients (4.9%) in the TAC-SRL2 mg, TAC-SRL0.5 mg and TAC-MMF groups, respectively, discontinued the study because of adverse events. Hyperlipemia was reported more often in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (24.0%) compared with 19.4% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 11.0% (TAC-MMF; p < 0.05). Combining 2 mg sirolimus/day with tacrolimus results in lower rates of acute rejection, but a higher incidence of adverse events.     

Acute and Chronic Vascular Rejection in Nonhuman Primate Kidney Transplantation

A nonhuman primate (NHP) study was designed to evaluate in nonlife-supporting kidney allografts the progression from acute rejection with transplant endarteritis (TXA) to chronic rejection (CR) with sclerosing vasculopathy. Group G1 (n = 6) received high cyclosporine A (CsA) immunosuppression and showed neither TXA nor CR during 90 days post-transplantation. Group G2 (n = 6) received suboptimal CsA immunosuppression and showed severe TXA with graft loss within 46 days (median). Arterial intimal changes included infiltration of macrophages and T lymphocytes (CD3, CD4, CD8) with few myofibroblasts, abundant fibronectin/collagen IV, scant collagens I/III, high rate of cellular proliferation and no C4d accumulation along peritubular capillaries. Group G3 (n = 12) received suboptimal CsA and anti-rejection therapy (rabbit ATG + methylprednisolone + CsA) of TXA. Animals developed CR and lost grafts within 65 days (median). As compared to G2, the arterial intimal changes showed less macrophages and T lymphocytes, an increased number of myofibroblasts, abundant fibronectin/collagen IV and scar collagens I/III, C4d deposition along capillaries in 60% of animals and transplant glomerulopathy in 80% of animals. In conclusion, CR is an immune stimulated process initiated during TXA with the accumulation and proliferation of myofibroblasts, and progressive deposition of collagens in the intima. Our experimental design appears well suited to study events leading to CR.     

Sirolimus in Combination with Tacrolimus Is Associated with Worse Renal Allograft Survival Compared to Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined with Tacrolimus

Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is enhanced by sirolimus (SRL). Tacrolimus is perceived to be less nephrotoxic than CsA, and therefore, CsA has been largely replaced by tacrolimus (TAC) when calcineurin inhibitors are used with SRL. We analyzed 44 915 adult renal transplants in the Scientific Renal Transplant Registry (SRTR) from 2000 to 2004. Three thousand five hundred twenty-four (7.8%) patients received a baseline immunosuppressive regimen of TAC/SRL, with an inferior overall (log-rank p<0.001) and death-censored graft survival (p<0.001) as compared to TAC/MMF (N=27 007). This effect was confirmed in multivariate Cox models; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for overall graft loss with TAC/SRL was 1.47 (95% CI=1.32, 1.63) and for CsA/SRL 1.38 (95% CI=1.20, 1.59) relative to TAC/MMF. These effects were most apparent in high-risk transplants. Six-month acute rejection rates were low (11.5-12.6%) and not different between groups. In summary, national data indicate that TAC/SRL as compared to TAC/MMF is associated with significantly worse renal allograft survival in all subgroups of patients and, in particular, higher-risk transplants. These results have to be interpreted in the context of the inherent limitations of any retrospective database analysis and evaluated in context with data from prospective clinical trials.     

Pharmacokinetics of Sirolimus and Tacrolimus in Pediatric Transplant Patients

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of Sirolimus (SRL) and Tacrolimus (TAC) in pediatric transplant recipients. Fifty-one SRL and 55 TAC pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained from 20 male and 14 female recipients of liver alone (LTx, n = 23), small bowel alone, and with liver (SBTx, n = 11). The median age was 13.3 years (range 0.9-23.9). Whole blood concentrations of SRL and TAC were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and microparticulate enzyme immunoassay (MEIA-Abbott Laboratories, IL), respectively. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were derived from noncompartmental model analysis. The half-life was estimated using the data points during the terminal disposition phase and area under the concentration (AUC) time curve was calculated within a dosing interval using the trapezoidal method. The dose of SRL or TAC did not correlate with the corresponding AUCs. Trough concentrations of SRL and TAC correlated well with AUC (r = 0.8544 and 0.8603, respectively). Half-life (h) did not differ significantly between different transplant groups for SRL and TAC (SRL: LTx: 21.2 h, SBTx: 19.3 h; TAC: LTx: 14.1 h, SBTx: 12.7 h). Serial PK analysis with the first measurement within 14 days after transplantation revealed no difference in AUC/dose/BSA for SRL, with time. During this period, SRL half-life increased significantly, from 11.2 +/- 1.0-20.1 +/- 3.1 h (n = 4; p = 0.02). After introduction of SRL, TAC half-life did not change (11.6 +/- 3.9-14.0 +/- 10.4, n = 10, P = 0.52) in all the groups analyzed together. TAC AUC/dose/BSA decreased significantly in LTx and SBTx patients (90.9 +/- 55.3 vs. 48.8 +/- 27.3). Trough concentration measurements provide good estimates of SRL and TAC exposure in pediatric transplant recipients. The short half-life of SRL in children may support twice-daily administration early after liver and small intestinal transplantation. During conversion of subjects from TAC to combined TAC and SRL, aggressive therapeutic drug monitoring must be used to individualize therapy and avoid serous adverse events.     

Low toxicity regimens in renal transplantation: a country subset analysis of the Symphony study

Regional transplant practices may affect clinical outcomes within multinational studies. This study evaluated whether the overall results from the Symphony study can be generalized to the participating countries. De novo adult renal transplant recipients ( n  = 1645) were randomized to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, or daclizumab induction plus low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus, all in addition to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Data for the highest patient-recruiting countries, Spain ( n  = 275), Germany ( n  = 316) and Turkey ( n  = 258), were compared. Patient transplant characteristics were different among the country subsets; only deceased donors in Spain, more expanded criteria donors in Germany, and mainly living donors in Turkey. Efficacy results for the three countries were consistent with that of the overall study – renal function and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rates were superior with low-dose tacrolimus. Turkey had higher mean calculated glomerular filtration rate across all treatment groups (60.6–72.2 ml/min) compared with that of Spain (51.1–57.5 ml/min) and Germany (51.3–62.9 ml/min). Spain and Turkey had lower BPAR rates across the four treatment groups compared with the overall study; Germany had much higher rates (21.0–54.2%). These findings confirm the general applicability of the Symphony study results and highlight the importance of inclusion of patients from different geographic origins in randomized clinical trials.     

Adding Sirolimus to Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients Reduces Tacrolimus Exposure

In adult renal recipients, coadministration of tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SIR) results in reduced exposure to TAC at SIR doses of 2 mg/day. Eight pediatric renal recipients (median age at transplant 2.0 years, range: 1.2-12.9 years) were converted to TAC- and SIR-based immunosuppression as a rescue therapy. All patients had biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy. TAC levels were measured using a commercially available EMIT assay and SIR levels with a newly developed assay based on the LC-MS MS technology. SIR was started at 0.13+/-0.05 mg/kg/day (3.51+/-1.26 mg/m2/day) in two divided doses. TAC was given at 0.14+/-0.09 mg/kg/day, resulting in a trough level of 6.3+/-2.5 ng/mL. After the addition of SIR, the median dose required to keep TAC blood trough concentrations within the target range increased by 71.2% (range: 21.9-245.4%), dose-normalized TAC exposure (AUC) decreased to 67.1% and the dose-normalized C(max), a surrogate for absorption rate, to 53.8% (both geometric means) while terminal half-life (t1/2), a pharmacokinetic parameter characterizing systemic elimination, remained unchanged (p<0.93). Adding SIR to TAC-based immunosuppression in young pediatric renal transplant recipients results in a significant decrease of TAC exposure. TAC trough levels should be monitored frequently.     

Daclizumab induction/tacrolimus sparing: a randomized prospective trial in renal transplantation

Abstract: Tacrolimus inhibits lymphocyte responses by blocking calcium-dependent signalling pathways important in IL-2 generation. Daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds with high affinity to the Tac subunit of the IL-2 receptor complex. We reasoned therefore that the absence of IL-2R should permit lower doses of tacrolimus and thereby less toxicity. Twenty-eight patients were randomized and followed for 6 months: Group 1, high dose (HD) tacrolimus (trough 12–17 ng/mL; n  = 13); Group 2, low dose (LD) tacrolimus (trough 5–10 ng/mL; n  = 15). All patients received daclizumab induction (2 mg/kg) on days 0 and 14, mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/d except for one patient who received 1 g) and rapid prednisone taper. Serious infections were minimal in both groups. Hospitalizations, for various reasons, were HD ( n  = 12) and LD ( n  = 6). All patients and grafts survived for the 6-month study period. There was one rejection episode in a non-compliant patient at 101 d. LD tacrolimus appears equally effective as HD tacrolimus in preventing rejection episodes and may be associated with fewer adverse events.     

Planned Randomized Conversion From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus‐Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Planned conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus was evaluated in de novo kidney transplant recipients. In this multicenter, randomized, open‐label study, 297 patients were initially treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium and prednisone. Of the 283 patients reaching 3 months, 97 were converted to sirolimus (SRL), 107 were maintained on tacrolimus (TAC) and 79 were patients receiving TAC without criteria to undergo intervention at month 3 (TACex). The primary objective was to show superior estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the SRL group at month 24. Of the 258 patients who completed 24 months, 91 (94%) were in the SRL group, 101 (94%) in the TAC group and 66 (84%) in the TACex group. In the intention‐to‐treat population there were no differences in eGFR (66.2 ± 25.3 vs. 70.7 ± 25.1, p = 0.817) or in the severity of chronic sclerosing lesions scores in 24‐month protocol biopsies. Higher mean urinary protein‐to‐creatinine ratio (0.36 ± 0.69 vs. 0.15 ± 0.53, p = 0.03) and higher incidence of treated acute rejection between months 3–24 (13.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.047) were observed in SRL compared to TAC group. In this population planned conversion from TAC to SRL 3 months after kidney transplantation was not associated with improved renal function at 24 months.     

Comparison of Sirolimus with Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Sirolimus-based Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Regimen in Live Donor Renal Transplantation

Between May 2001 and January 2003, 132 live donor renal allotransplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial where they were divided into two groups. All patients received steroids and basiliximab induction therapy. For maintenance immunosuppression, tacrolimus and sirolimus were used in group A. In group B, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus were utilized. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. One-year patient and graft survival rates were not significantly different between group A (96.9%, 92.3%) and group B (100%, 98.4%), respectively. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was less in group B but the difference was not statistically significant (13.5% vs. 18.5% in group A). Statistically significant better renal function was encountered among group B patients at two years post-transplantation as measured by serum creatinine (1.25 vs. 1.43 mg/dl; P = 0.017) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (94.9 vs. 79.6 ml/min; P = 0.005). One year protocol biopsies showed insignificant differences relative to chronic allograft damage index (CADI) between either group (Group A: 2.41 vs. Group B: 2.69; P = 0.436). Conclusion: Similar outcome was noted among patients in whom calcineurin inhibitors were not included in their immunosuppressive regimen. The long term impact of this observation on graft survival and function needs longer follow up.     

Use of low dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and maintenance IL-2 receptor blockade in an islet transplant recipient

Abstract:  The utilization of dual maintenance therapy with tacrolimus and sirolimus (the Edmonton protocol) has been widely adopted as standard immunosuppression for islet cell transplantation. This immunosuppression regimen has numerous toxicities including renal dysfunction, anemia, and recurrent aphthous ulcers. We present a case of a 63-yr-old Caucasian female who received an isolated islet transplant. Over the first six months post-transplant, the patient developed severe anemia, intractable aphthous ulcers, and renal dysfunction. Islet transplant function was excellent and the patient is insulin-independent since the end of the second month post-transplant. However, because of the above toxicities, a decision was made to change her immunosuppression regimen eight months post-transplant to low dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and a monthly maintenance infusion of daclizumab. Since then, her aphthous ulcers have disappeared, renal function has improved, and islet cell function remains stable.     

Sirolimus exposure during the early post-transplant period reduces the risk of CMV infection relative to tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients

INTRODUCTION: There are limited data regarding the role of individual maintenance immunosuppressive agents in the development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. We examined the association between exposure to sirolimus (SRL) and risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation when compared with tacrolimus (TCL). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of adult renal allograft recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2005 at our center. Patients received anti-lymphocyte antibody induction, and mycophenolate mofetil with either SRL or TCL +/- prednisone. D+/R- patients received valganciclovir 900 mg/d and CMV + patients 450 mg/d for three months. CMV infection was diagnosed with pp65 antigenemia testing prompted by clinical suspicion. RESULTS: A total of 14 Cases with CMV infection and 129 Controls were identified for primary analysis, and 11 D+/R- Cases and 19 D+/R- Controls for secondary analysis. The groups were comparable in both analyses, except for D+/R- serostatus in the primary analysis. All 14 Cases were on TCL for at least three months prior to diagnosis of CMV infection. In the primary analysis, zero Cases, but 30.2% and 34.9% of Controls (p = 0.009 and 0.004), and in secondary analysis, zero Cases, but 31.6% and 42.1% of Controls (p = 0.046 and 0.013), were on SRL at one and three months, respectively. In the primary analysis, zero Cases vs. 45 Controls (p = 0.004), and in secondary analysis, zero Cases vs. eight Controls (p = 0.013), were on SRL for at least three months early post-transplantation. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that SRL as a component of a multidrug immunosuppressive regimen decreases the risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation when compared with TCL.     

Daclizumab induction and maintenance steroid-free immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus to prevent acute rejection of hepatic allografts

Steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens reduce corticosteroid-related side effects in liver transplant recipients although their efficacy is very variable. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a steroid-free regimen in a 6-month, open-label, multicenter, pilot study, which involved 102 liver transplant patients treated with daclizumab (2 mg/kg within 6 h following transplant and 1 mg/kg on day 7), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g b.i.d) and tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-15 ng/ml in the first month and 5-10 ng/ml thereafter). One intra-operative dose of methylprednisolone was administered. At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 9.8%, and patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 95%, respectively. Acute rejection rates were similar for hepatitis C-positive patients (8.6%) and hepatitis C-negative patients (10.4%). Infections occurred in 22% of patients; most cases were considered mild or moderate. Post-transplantation hypertension and diabetes mellitus developed in 37% and 14% of patients, respectively, during the study period, but were markedly less frequent (8% and 6%, respectively) at 6 months. Hypercholesterolemia was observed in only 2% of patients. In conclusion, the steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen of daclizumab, MMF, and tacrolimus effectively prevents acute rejection after liver transplantation without decreasing safety.     

The Use of Daclizumab, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in African-American and Hispanic First Renal Transplant Recipients

Limited data are available on the use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in conjunction with anti-IL-2 receptor antibody, in groups of kidney transplant recipients considered to be at higher risk. This study compared the incidence of acute rejection between African-American (AA), Hispanic (H), and non-African-American, non-Hispanics (non-AA, non-H) first renal transplant recipients. We studied 233 sequential first renal transplants. Of the 233, 37 recipients (16%) were AA, 85 (36.5%) were H and 111 (47.5%) were non-AA, non-H. All received daclizumab induction therapy (1 mg/kg) on the day of surgery, and every other week for a total of 5 doses, as well as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and steroids. At 1 year, patient and graft survival were 97% and 95% in AA, 98% and 98% in H, and 96% and 95% in non-AA, non-H, respectively (not statistically different). Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were 8.1% in AA, 4.7% in H, and 4.5% in non-AA, non-H (also not statistically different). This immunosuppressive protocol appears to be safe and effective in helping to minimize biopsy-proven acute rejection and optimize renal allograft survival in African-American and Hispanic renal transplant recipients in the first year post transplantation.     

A Multicenter Pilot Study of Early (4-Day) Steroid Cessation in Renal Transplant Recipients Under Simulect, Tacrolimus and Sirolimus

This study presents the first prospective multicenter study assessing sirolimus-based immunosuppression with early (4-day) corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) in renal transplantation. Immunosuppression included: anti-IL-2 receptor antibody and tacrolimus/sirolimus. Inclusion criteria included adult primary recipients. Exclusion criteria included: (i) African Americans, (ii) current PRA >50%, (iii) multiple organ transplants, (iv) WBC < 3000 cells/microL and (v) fasting hypercholesterolemia/hypertriglyceridemia. The primary endpoints were acute rejection and the proportion of patients off corticosteroids. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled: mean age of 49.7 +/- 12 years. Transplants included: cadaveric (26%) and living donor (74%). Patient and graft survival were 100%. Biopsy proven acute rejection occurred in 13%; presumptive rejection in 10.5%. Banff grades included: IA (seven patients), IB (one patient), IIA (one patient) and IIB (one patient). Renal function at 1 year: serum creatinine (1.18 +/- 0.06 mg/dL). Mean weight gain was minimal at 1 year: 3 +/- 2 kg/patient. Mild increases in total, LDL and HDL cholesterol were observed and new antilipid agent use occurred in 26 patients. In conclusion, early CSWD under tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression in selected, low-risk renal transplant recipients provides: (i) excellent patient and graft survival, (ii) good renal function, (iii) reduced hyperlipidemia and antilipid agent use and (iv) low acute rejection rates.     

Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus Conversion in Cardiac Transplant Recipients With Renal Insufficiency

This randomized, comparative, multinational phase 3b/4 study of patients 1–8 years postcardiac transplantation (mean 3.9 years) evaluated the effect of conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus on renal function in patients with renal insufficiency. In total, 116 patients on CNI therapy with GFR 40–90 mL/min/1.73m² were randomized (1:1) to sirolimus (n = 57) or CNI (n = 59). Intent‐to‐treat analysis showed the 1‐year adjusted mean change from baseline in creatinine clearance (Cockcroft‐Gault) was significantly higher with sirolimus versus CNI treatment (+3.0 vs. ?1.4 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively; p = 0.004). By on‐therapy analysis, values were +4.7 and –2.1, respectively (p < 0.001). Acute rejection (AR) rates were numerically higher in the sirolimus group; 1 AR with hemodynamic compromise occurred in each group. A significantly higher treatment discontinuation rate due to adverse events (AEs; 33.3% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) occurred in the sirolimus group. Most common treatment‐emergent AEs significantly higher in the sirolimus group were diarrhea (28.1%), rash (28.1%) and infection (47.4%). Conversion to sirolimus from CNI therapy improved renal function in cardiac transplant recipients with renal impairment, but was associated with an attendant AR risk and higher discontinuation rate attributable to AEs.     

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) and Tacrolimus Monotherapy After Renal Transplantation: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

The lymphocyte-depleting antibody alemtuzumab was evaluated in a prospective randomized multicenter trial in deceased donor kidney transplantation.
The 65 patients in the study group received induction with alemtuzumab followed by delayed tacrolimus monotherapy, while the 66 patients in the control group were started on tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Tacrolimus levels of 8–12 ng/mL for the first 6 months and 5–8 ng/mL thereafter were aimed for in both groups.
At 12 months the biopsy-proven rejection rate was 20% in the study group and 32% in the control group (p = 0.09). Patient survival at 1 year was 98% for both groups. Graft survival was 96% for the study group versus 90% for the control group (p = 0.18).
Graft function was identical in both groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups apart for more CMV infections in the study group. At the end of the first year 82% of the patients in the study group were steroid-free and 71% continued on tacrolimus monotherapy.
These results suggest that alemtuzumab induction together with tacrolimus monotherapy is at least as efficient in renal transplantation as is a tacrolimus-based triple-drug regimen with a similar safety profile but more CMV infections.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus Combination in Renal Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are potent non-nephrotoxic xenobiotic immunosuppressants. Their complementary properties may provide the rationale for their combination in induction and maintenance regimens. MMF, a reversible inhibitor of inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) acts as an antiproliferative drug; and SRL, an mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, inhibits cell proliferation driven by growth factors. Early experiences with the use of the SRL, MMF and steroid combination yielded insufficient prophylaxis of acute rejection. However, the introduction of induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies to the SRL-MMF and steroid combination brings an efficient acute rejection prophylaxis, while improving renal function and/or reducing of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). However, adverse events related to the use of this drug combination (mainly haematological and surgery-related) result in a high rate of discontinuations in some trials, which may hamper the potential benefits of this calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free strategy. Also, currently under investigation is whether in long-term immunosuppression, in MMF-treated patients, CNIs can be replaced by SRL to avoid and/or halt progression of chronic nephropathy and to improve graft survival. However, some authors reported a high proportion of patients with oral ulcers and proteinuria after switching to SRL. In short, refining the use of MMF and SRL may provide a better risk/benefit ratio to pave the way towards non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression.     

One-Year Results with Extended-Release Tacrolimus/MMF, Tacrolimus/MMF and Cyclosporine/MMF in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation (Prograf XL, formerly referred to as MR or MR4) was compared with the twice-a-day tacrolimus formulation (TAC) and cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA), all administered in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, in a phase 3, randomized (1:1:1), open-label trial in 638 de novo kidney transplant recipients. In combination with MMF and corticosteroids, XL had an efficacy profile comparable to TAC and CsA. XL/MMF and TAC/MMF were statistically noninferior at 1-year posttransplantation to CsA/MMF for the primary efficacy endpoint, efficacy failure (death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) or lost to follow-up). One-year patient and graft survival were 98.6% and 96.7% in the XL/MMF group, 95.7% and 92.9% in TAC/MMF group and 97.6% and 95.7% in CsA/MMF group. The safety profile of XL in comparison with CsA was similar to that observed with TAC in this study and consistent with previously published reports of TAC in comparison with CsA. The results support the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with MMF, corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, as well as XL as a safe and effective once-daily dosing alternative.     

Testosterone Concentrations and Sirolimus in Male Renal Transplant Patients

Sirolimus damages the testes in animals; however, human data are sparse. We conducted a case-control study to obtain further insight into this issue and compared testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and prolactin concentrations in matched renal transplant patients who did or did not receive sirolimus. We found that testosterone values were lower (11.2 +/- 6.3 nmol/L vs. 15.5 +/- 7.7 nmol/L, p < 0.05), in 28 sirolimus-treated patients, compared to 28 non-sirolimus-treated controls. Furthermore, these patients more commonly had testosterone concentrations that were below our reference value for normal men. In contrast, FSH and LH concentrations were higher while prolactin levels were not different. These data are consistent with sirolimus-related testosterone suppression and suggest a need for further studies.