Consensual pupillary responses to mydriatic and miotic drugs.

1. Three experiments were conducted to examine whether mydriatic or miotic drugs instilled into one eye have any effect on the diameter of the pupil of the untreated fellow eye, in healthy volunteers. 2. In Experiment 1, the effects of four subjects, using photography in an illuminated room to assess pupil diameter. The drug evoked a dose-dependent mydriasis in the index eye which was accompanied by a simultaneous dose-dependent miosis in the fellow eye. 3. In Experiment 2, the same method was used to assess pupil diameter as in Experiment 1. The effects of mydriatic (methoxamine and tyramine) and of miotic (pilocarpine) drugs instilled into the fellow eye, were studied on the sizes of pupillary responses to the same drugs instilled into the index eye. The presence of a mydriatic drug in the fellow eye resulted in a decrease in the size of the mydriatic responses in the index eye. 4. In Experiment 3, the effects of three concentrations of phenylephrine hydrochloride (0.15-0.60 M) and of three concentrations of pilocarpine hydrochloride (0.002-0.008 M), were studied in darkness using an infra-red binocular television pupillometer, in seven subjects. Phenylephrine evoked dose-dependent mydriasis and pilocarpine evoked dose-dependent miosis. The pupillary responses of the index eye were not accompanied by any changes in the diameter of the pupil of the fellow eye. 5. It is concluded that drug-induced mydriasis in the index eye is accompanied by a consensual miosis in the fellow eye.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ocular Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Phenylephrine and Phenylephrine Oxazolidine in Rabbit Eyes

The aqueous humor concentration of phenylephrine and its corresponding mydriatic response were measured over time in New Zealand albino rabbit eyes following a 10-µl topical instillation of a phenylephrine HC1 viscous solution (10%) or a phenylephrine oxazolidine (prodrug) suspension in sesame oil (1 and 10%). The bioavailability of a 1% prodrug suspension in the rabbit eye (AUC of aqueous humor concentration vs time) was 30% lower than that of a 10% phenylephrine solution (P < 0.1) with the exception that the peak time occurred 34 min earlier with the prodrug. A 10% prodrug suspension increased the aqueous humor bioavailability approximately eightfold but improved the mydriatic activity (AUC of mydriasis vs time) only fourfold. The pharmacokinetic parameters, apparent absorption, and elimination rate constants, of phenylephrine and the prodrug were determined from aqueous humor concentration–time and mydriasis–time profiles. The study showed that the kinetic parameters of phenylephrine estimated from its mydriasis profile do not accurately reflect the kinetics of drug distribution in the iris. These parameters also varied with the instillation of phenylephrine solution or prodrug suspensions. A mydriatic tolerance of the pupil response was apparent after the topical instillation of phenylephrine solution. The mydriatic tolerance may be due to the decrease in receptor number in the iris dilator muscle.     

Reversal of tropicamide-induced mydriasis by thymoxamine eye drops

In a study in 12 healthy volunteers, local instillation of thymoxamine eye drops (0.5%), completely reversed the mydriasis produced by tropicamide (0.5%), but only incompletely that by tropicamide (1.0%). The difference between these effects was statistically significant (p less than 0.025). The thymoxamine eye drops were well tolerated.     

复方托吡卡胺滴眼液致突发性耳聋

1名60岁女性糖尿病患者，行眼底检查前用复方托吡卡胺滴眼液散瞳，随后出现听力明显下降伴耳呜，检查提示双耳感音神经性耳聋。经高压氧、葛根素治疗后，听力明显恢复。因眼科检查需要，再次用复方托吡卡胺滴眼液，用药后患者又出现听力明显下降，经对症治疗后好转。当患者第4次使用该药后出现耳聋，治疗1月余，听力仍未恢复。     

Visual recovery using small dilating eye drops.

It is well established that reduced size dilating eye drops of 1% tropicamide and 10% phenylephrine (micro drops) are effective for clinical purposes. Excellent pupil dilatation (mydriasis) is achieved and pupil constriction does not occur in response to light. In this study, the effect of micro drops of 1% tropicamide on distance and near visual recovery was compared with standard drops in a group of 20 healthy volunteers. For each person studied, one eye was selected at random to be tested first with the standard drop size, and then after a minimum of one week, the same eye was again tested using a drop of the same drug one fifth standard size. An iris photograph, Snellen visual acuity at 6 m, and reading visual acuity was obtained for each test procedure: before drop instillation and at 30 min, 1, 2 and 4 h after drug instillation. Use of the micro drops caused a small but statistically significant improvement in the rate of recovery of distance and near visual acuity. These findings, allied to the known beneficial effects of reduced systemic absorption using micro drops, lend further weight to the argument that mydriasis may be achieved more safely, with fewer side effects, and with earlier return of normal vision when reduced size drops are used. It is hoped that practical micro drop dispensers will be developed.     

Aqueous humour concentration and the intraocular pressure-lowering effect of topical betaxolol before cataract surgery

Objective: The aim was to study the relationship between aqueous humour betaxolol concentration and intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: In this double-blind, randomized study, we administered betaxolol (a) or placebo (b) ocularly to 131 patients scheduled for cataract surgery. The patients were randomly divided into ten groups. In groups 1a and 1b, the drug was scheduled to be instilled 1–2 h, in groups 2a and 2b 12 h, in groups 3a and 3b 24 h, and in groups 4a and 4b 48 h before surgery. The pupil was dilated in all eyes prior to surgery. The IOP was measured with Perkins' applanation tonometer before the instillation of the drug and just before the peribulbar block. Twenty microlitres of 0.5% betaxolol or placebo solution was instilled into the eye. IOP was also measured before instillation of the drug and after 1–2 h in undilated eyes of 20 patients, whose contralateral eye was to be operated on, to rule out the effect of pupil dilation on IOP (groups 5a and 5b). Aqueous humour betaxolol concentrations were analysed using a radioreceptor assay. Results: Betaxolol did not decrease IOP significantly in eyes with pupillary dilation. Both betaxolol and placebo decreased IOP significantly in patients without pupillary dilation, the effect of betaxolol being slightly more pronounced. The betaxolol concentration in aqueous humour was 731 ng · ml⁻¹ in group 1a, 2.4 h after drug instillation. Measurable concentrations of betaxolol were also detected in aqueous humour in group 4a 47.7 h after drug administration. Conclusion: No correlation between aqueous humour concentration of betaxolol and the effect on IOP was found in eyes where the pupil was dilated before surgery. A single betaxolol dose did not decrease IOP significantly in patients undergoing cataract surgery, but the IOP decreasing effect was, however, clearly seen in patients who did not receive mydriatic drugs. The routine use of topical betaxolol prior to cataract surgery to decrease IOP is not recommended. Received: 22 August 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 11 March 1998     

Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge

ABSTRACT

Background: Olopatadine 0.2% (Pataday, Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA) and epinastine 0.05% (Elestat, Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Durham, NC, USA) are topical ocular anti-allergic agents. Both are H₁ antihistamine/mast cell stabilizers indicated for the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% with epinastine 0.05%, in the prevention of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis following conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC).

Research design and methods: This was a 7 week, four visit, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled CAC study. Visit 1 screened subjects for positive ocular allergic responses and Visit 2 confirmed those responses. At Visit 3, 92 subjects were randomized into one of four treatment groups to receive one drop of study medication in each eye: (1) olopatadine 0.2%/placebo, (2) epinastine 0.05%/placebo, (3) olopatadine 0.2%/epinastine 0.05%, (4) placebo/placebo. Subjects were challenged 12?h after drop instillation to evaluate duration of action. At Visit 4, subjects were challenged 5?min after drop instillation to evaluate onset of action. Drop comfort was assessed at Visit 4.

Main outcome measures; results: This article focuses on the results of the onset-of-action challenge (Visit 4). At Visit 4, ocular itching was assessed at 3, 5, and 7?min and redness was assessed at 7, 15, and 20?min post-challenge. Drop comfort was assessed upon instillation, at 30?s, and at 1, 2, and 5?min post-instillation. Olopatadine 0.2%-treated eyes exhibited significantly lower mean ocular itching scores versus epinastine 0.05%-treated eyes at 5 (?p = 0.024) and 7?min (?p = 0.003) post-challenge. Olopatadine 0.2%-treated eyes exhibited significantly lower mean redness scores versus epinastine 0.05%-treated eyes at all time points post-challenge (ciliary: p ≤ 0.013, conjunctival: p ≤ 0.015, episcleral: p ≤ 0.006). Olopatadine 0.2% was rated as significantly more comfortable than epinastine 0.05% at 1?min post-drop instillation (?p = 0.003). All adverse events were non-serious and unrelated to study medication. Although the CAC model reproduces allergic responses that are not environmentally-induced, patients experience varying severities of responses as are seen in real-world situations.

Conclusion: Olopatadine 0.2% was superior to epinastine 0.05% in preventing ocular itching and redness at onset when induced by the CAC model.     

Influence of alpha-adrenoceptor blockade with thymoxamine on changes in pupil diameter and accommodation produced by tropicamide and ephedrine.

In a study in 12 healthy volunteers, local instillation of thymoxamine eye-drops (0.2%) completely reversed the mydriasis produced by ephedrine (5%) but not that produced by ephedrine (5%) together with tropicamide (0.5%). Small but significant changes in accommodation were found with ephedrine and reversed by thymoxamine, suggesting that they were mediated through alpha-adrenoceptor activity. The thymoxamine eyedrops were well tolerated.     

Improving the ocular absorption of phenylephrine

An oxazolidine prodrug of phenylephrine and the base form of phenylephrine were synthesized, suspended in sesame oil, and tested for mydriatic activity against phenylephrine HCl. The HCl salt was formulated as a viscous aqueous solution and as a sesame oil suspension. A dosing volume of 10 microliter was instilled into rabbit eyes and the pupillary diameter was measured over time. A 0.045 M prodrug suspension was judged equal in mydriatic activity to a 0.45 M viscous solution of phenylephrine HCl with the exception that the time of maximum response occurred 60 min earlier with the prodrug. When phenylephrine base was suspended in sesame oil at 0.045, 0.12, and 0.45 M, the mydriatic activity was also greater than equimolar suspensions of phenylephrine HCl. The pH of tear fluids was also measured over time and found to rise 1.1, 0.70, and 0.30 pH units for 0.45, 0.12, and 0.045 M suspensions of the base form but remain unchanged when phenylephrine HCl was instilled in the rabbit eye. The greater activity associated with the base form of phenylephrine was judged a result of the change in pH to favour the absorption of phenylephrine. This latter approach should be applicable to either weak acids or weak bases with pKa values outside of the normal pH range (7-8) of the tears and in concentrations greater than 0.045 M suspended in a non-aqueous vehicle.     

Topically applied 1% voriconazole induces dysplastic changes on the ocular surface: animal study

Purpose: To identify the risk of inducing ocular surface dysplasia following topical administration of 1% voriconazole eye drop.

Methods: Fourteen noninflamed healthy eyes of 14 white adult New Zealand rabbits were included in the study. The rabbits were randomly divided into two groups comprised of 7 rabbits each. Group 1 received topical 1% voriconazole and Group 2 received topical saline as the control group. In all animals, right eye was selected for the study. In Group 1 (Voriconazole Group), single drop of voriconazole was instilled every 10?min consecutively for 17 times a day for 60?days. In Group 2 (Control Group), single drop of saline was instilled every 10?min consecutively for 17 times a day for 60?days. At two months, animals were sacrificed and study eyes were enucleated with the eyelids. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and histopathologic changes in cornea, bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva were evaluated under light microscope.

Results: There were no macroscopically visible lesions on the ocular surface of any rabbits. Histopathological evaluation showed mild to moderate dysplasia localized mainly in the limbus and extending to the adjacent cornea and bulbar conjunctiva in all rabbits in Voriconazole Group. Severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ was not observed. In the Control Group, dysplasia was not observed, at all.

Conclusion: This animal study provides a possible relationship between topically administered 1% voriconazole and ocular surface dysplasia. We recommend ophthalmologists to be aware of the risk of ocular surface dysplasia in patients received voriconazole eye drop.     

Pharmacodynamics of a new ophthalmic mydriatic insert in healthy volunteers: potential alternative as drug delivery system prior to cataract surgery

Cataract surgery requires a satisfactory degree of mydriasis throughout the entire operation. A phase I, open-labelled, randomised, cross-over trial was conducted in 18 healthy volunteers to compare mydriasis obtained with subsequent administration of phenylephrine 10% and tropicamide 0.5% eyedrops or a new insoluble-matrix retropalpebral ophthalmic insert containing 5.38 mg phenylephrine and 0.28 mg tropicamide. Phenylephrine serum concentrations were measured over 6 hr following each treatment administration. Secondary end-points included cardiovascular, general and local tolerance and quantification of bacterial colonisation of the conjunctiva and the cultured insert, respectively. When normalized to the pupil diameter after conventional treatment, the diameter achieved with the insert was 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.48, P=0.38). Moreover, standard eye drops provided faster effective mydriasis than the insert, starting 30 min. as compared to 90 min. upon treatment administration (P<0.01, repeated-measures ANOVA). Phenylephrine concentrations remained almost undetectable for both treatments and no change in heart rate or blood pressure were observed throughout the study. Only three superficial punctuate keratitis were diagnosed with the insert and two with the eye drops. No significant bacterial contamination of conjunctiva swab and cultured insert was observed. The new insoluble-matrix retropalpebral ophthalmic mydriatic insert produced similar but delayed effective and prolonged mydriasis as compared to the standard delivery system. In addition to its potential usefulness in patients undergoing cataract surgery, such new ophthalmic delivery system may be an advantage in children who need to undergo fundus photography due to the single administration and excellent tolerance as well.     

Influence of Alpha-Adrenoceptor Blockade with Thymoxamine on Changes in Pupil Diameter and Accommodation Produced by Tropicamide and Ephedrine

Summary

In a study in 12 healthy volunteers, local instillation of thymoxamine eye-drops (0.2 %) completely reversed the mydriasis produced by ephedrine (5 %) but not that produced by ephedrine (5%) together with tropicamide (0.5%). Small but significant changes in accommodation were found with ephedrine and reversed by thymoxamine, suggesting that they were mediated through alpha-adrenoceptor activity. The thymoxamine eyedrops were well tolerated.     

Asymmetric mydriatic response to topical tyramine in cluster headache relatives

A pupillometric study was performed to evaluate the mydriatic response to tyramine, a noradrenaline releaser. There were three groups of subjects: (a) 10 cluster headache patients, in an asymptomatic period; (b) 20 of their close relatives, exempt from this disease; (c) 10 healthy controls. The tyramine was instilled into both eyes of each subject. The controls displayed an isocoric tyramine-induced mydriasis but the cluster headache sufferers and their relatives showed an anisocoric mydriasis. This anisocoric mydriasis was caused by a deficient mydriatic response on one side, which in the cluster patients corresponded to the symptomatic side. The sympathetic abnormality of the iris may be the expression of a functional asymmetry in the hypothalamus. Central sympathetic asymmetry could thus represent a dysgenetic family predisposition to lateralized headache attacks.     

Pupillometry study of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and apraclonidine 0.5%

This study investigated possible effects of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and apraclonidine 0.5% on pupil diameter. Ten subjects between 20 and 40 years of age participated. A Colvard pupillometer (Oasis Medical) was used to measure pupil diameter. Baseline and serial measurements were obtained at 3 luminance levels (>6.4, <0.82-0.4, and <0.2-0.02 cd/m(2)) during a 4-hour interval following instillation of 1 drop of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% or apraclonidine 0.5% in one eye versus a placebo in the contralateral eye. The measurements for each drug were obtained on different days. A nested random effects model controlling for subject's age, race, and sex was used for statistical analysis. A maximum reduction in pupil diameter was observed at 90 minutes from instillation (1.40 mm at >6.4 cd/m(2), 1.69 mm at <0.82-0.4 cd/m(2), and 1.55 mm at <0.2-0.02 cd/m(2)) for brimonidine tartrate 0.2%. At all time intervals and illumination levels, miosis (P < .01) occurred. Apraclonidine 0.5% did not produce a significant effect on pupil diameter. Brimonidine tartrate 0.2% produced a moderate miotic effect. No effect was observed for apraclonidine 0.5%. A predominant agonistic effect on α-2 receptors of the iris dilator may explain this behavior.     

Topical brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution: in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

A fixed combination of brimonidine (a highly selective alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist) and timolol (a non-selective beta-blocker) [brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution; brimonidine/timolol] is available for the topical treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OH). Brimonidine and timolol decrease elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) by complementary mechanisms of action and have an additive effect when coadministered to healthy volunteers and patients with glaucoma or OH. When assessed over a 3- or 12-month period in large, well designed clinical studies, brimonidine/timolol instilled twice daily (one drop in each eye) was superior to monotherapy with the individual components instilled two (brimonidine) or three (timolol) times daily, and noninferior to concomitant therapy with the individual components instilled twice daily, in lowering raised IOP in patients with glaucoma or OH. In small, randomised, comparative studies of 1 or 3 months' duration, the IOP-lowering effect of brimonidine/timolol twice daily was similar or superior to that of fixed combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution (dorzolamide/timolol) twice daily (preliminary data). Brimonidine/timolol is generally well tolerated with a predictable local and systemic adverse event profile based on that of the individual components used alone and concomitantly. No unexpected or serious adverse events associated with the fixed combination were reported in key clinical trials. Brimonidine/timolol may be advantageous over dorzolamide/timolol with respect to ocular tolerability and comfort (preliminary data).     

Comparison of the effects of chronic administration of ciclazindol and desipramine on pupillary responses to tyramine, methoxamine and pilocarpine in healthy volunteers.

Twenty-nine healthy volunteers participated in an experiment lasting for 8 weeks: Phase I (2 weeks)--pre-treatment control period; Phase II (4 weeks)--medication with either ciclazindol hydrochloride (50 mg twice daily), or desipramine hydrochloride (50 mg twice daily) or lactose placebo (twice daily) administered in a single-blind fashion; Phase II (2 weeks)--recovery. Experimental sessions took place twice weekly for the photographic assessment of resting pupil diameter, and for the assessment of one of the following pupillary responses: mydriatic response to methoxamine, mydriatic response to tyramine, miotic response to pilocarpine. Resting pupil diameter increased during medication with either ciclazindol or desipramine. Methoxamine-evoked mydriasis and tyramine-evoked mydriasis were antagonized by both ciclazindol and desipramine. Pilocarpine-evoked miosis was potentiated by both ciclazindol and desipramine. The steady-state plasma levels (mean +/- s.e. mean) of the antidepressants were: ciclazindol: 5.90 +/- 0.74 microM; desipramine: 0.60 +/- 0.17 microM. The antagonism of methoxamine-evoked mydriasis is likely to reflect the blockade of postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptors in the iris by the antidepressants, whereas the antagonism of tyramine-evoked mydriasis may reflect both the blockade of uptake of tyramine into presynaptic adrenergic terminals and the blockade of postsynaptic alpha-adrenoceptors. There is no immediate explanation for the potentiation of pilocarpine-evoked miosis by the two antidepressants.     

Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model

BACKGROUND: Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution (Patanol) and epinastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution (Elestat) are two topical antiallergic agents. Olopatadine is indicated for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis that include itching, redness, tearing, lid swelling, and chemosis. Epinastine is indicated for the prevention of itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical efficacy of olopatadine and epinastine in the prevention of itching and conjunctival redness in the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-masked, contralaterally-controlled, single center allergen challenge study. Ninety-six subjects with a history of allergic conjunctivitis were screened, and the 66 who responded to conjunctival allergen challenge at visits 1 and 2 were randomized into 1 of 3 treatment groups at visit 3 to receive one drop of study medication in each eye: (1) olopatadine in one eye and epinastine in the fellow eye, (2) olopatadine in one eye and placebo in the fellow eye, and (3) epinastine in one eye and placebo in the fellow eye. Five minutes after study drop instillation, subjects were bilaterally challenged with the allergen concentration that had elicited a positive conjunctival allergic response at Visits 1 and 2. Subjective itching assessments were given at 3 min, 5 min, and 7 min post challenge. Objective redness and chemosis assessments were made at 10 min, 15 min, and 20 min post challenge. Paired sample two-tailed t-tests were performed on the mean scores at each time point to assess statistical significance in the differences between treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES; RESULTS: Fifty-three subjects were randomized into the olopatadine/epinastine treatment group, the primary analysis group. Olopatadine treated eyes exhibited significantly lower mean itching and conjunctival redness scores than the contralateral epinastine treated eyes, -0.19 (p = 0.003) and -0.52 (p < 0.001), respectively. Olopatadine treated eyes also exhibited significantly less chemosis -0.24 (p < 0.001), ciliary redness -0.55 (p < 0.001), and episcleral redness -0.58 (p < 0.001) than epinastine treated eyes. CONCLUSION: Olopatadine is significantly more effective than epinastine in controlling itching, redness and chemosis associated with allergic conjunctivitis in the CAC model.     

The local vasoconstriction of infant’s skin following instillation of mydriatic eye drops

Background  

Systemic absorption of eye drops is known to occur via the nasal mucosa, cornea, and conjunctiva. Diffusion of eye drops through the skin is previously unrecognized. Here, two cases are presented in which we observed skin pallor around the eyes after instillation of phenylephrine 2.5% drops. Case 1 A 32-week gestational age premature infant had mydriatic eye drops instilled as part of retinopathy of prematurity screening. Case 2 A term newborn dysmorphic infant underwent fundus examination to rule out ocular pathology. In both cases, discoloration of periorbital skin was observed 45 min following administration of drops.     

Tolerability and safety of 0.1% diclofenac plus 0.3% tobramycin fixed-dose ophthalmic solution: a randomized, comparative, controlled study in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this double-blind, observer-masked, randomized, crossover trial was to compare the tolerability and safety of a fixed-dose ophthalmic solution of 0.3% tobramycin plus 0.1% diclofenac versus Tobrex (tobramycin sulfate ophth) and Voltaren (diclofenac sodium). Control treatments included a saline solution and a control solution of 0.3% tobramycin prepared by Alcon Cusí. Ten healthy volunteers received three consecutive instillations of 1 drop of a given ophthalmic solution at 08:00, 11:00 and 14:00 h to the same eye; after a washout period of 18 h, the next ophthalmic solution was tested according to a randomized sequence. Occurrence, intensity, and duration of ocular irritation and conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and after the three instillations were recorded. Slit lamp biomicroscopy examination, measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, visual acuity, and examination of the fundus of the eye were performed after each third instillation by an ophthalmologist. Side effect incidence and patient and investigator opinions were also recorded. Results showed that Voltaren instillation induced statistically significant ocular irritation (p = 0.0077); the remaining ophthalmic solutions tested caused no ocular irritation (Physiological Saline Braun, p = 0.9808; Tobrex, p = 0.8826; control 0.3% tobramycin solution, p = 0.8327; and 0.1% diclofenac plus 0.3% tobramycin, p = 0.5399). None of the ophthalmic solutions tested caused severe conjunctival hyperemia. Analysis of the sum of conjunctival parameters of both eyes for all ophthalmic solutions studied showed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.4688). Moderate superficial punctate keratitis was observed after instillation of Voltaren and of 0.1% diclofenac plus 0.3% tobramycin (1 subject each) that spontaneously resolved within 2 days. Slit lamp biomicroscopy, visual acuity and IOP values showed no statistically significant changes. No systemic side effects related to the study treatments were recorded. In conclusion, the ophthalmic solution containing 0.1% diclofenac plus 0.3% tobramycin was well tolerated under the study conditions. Its tolerability was equivalent to that of Braun physiological saline, Tobrex and a control 0.3% tobramycin solution and was better than that of Voltaren.     

Centbucridine, a newer topical anaesthetic compared with lignocaine: a randomized double masked single drop instillation clinical trial.

A randomized double-masked single drop instillation clinical trial was conducted on 60 healthy volunteers divided into 3 equal groups to compare the efficacies of centbucridine and lignocaine. One eye of each volunteer was instilled with a single drop of either 0.5% centbucridine hydrochloride, 1% centbucridine hydrochloride or 4% lignocaine hydrochloride, with the other eye as an unanaesthetized control-side effects, if any, were also recorded. The onset of anaesthesia assessed both objectively and subjectively, was quickest with lignocaine 4% (P < 0.001) followed by centbucridine 0.5% and 1%. However, the period of peak activity as well as the total duration of surface anaesthesia, and also the depth of analgesia, were significantly highest with 1% centbucridine, followed by 0.5% centbucridine and 4% lignocaine respectively. Minor side effects like burning sensations were longest with 1% centbucridine--no significant adverse effects, local or systemic, were observed. Prolonged surface anaesthetic and analgesic actions of centbucridine 1% may be advantages for longer duration ophthalmic microsurgeries.