Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine therapy improves dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: a prospective study using single-dose challenges.

Continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion of the dopamine agonist apomorphine was shown in retrospective studies to improve drug-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease (PD). We prospectively assessed the antidyskinetic effect of continuous SC apomorphine therapy using subjective and objective measures, and sought to determine whether any observed dyskinesia reduction could be corroborated using single-dose dopaminergic challenges. Twelve PD patients with on-off fluctuations and disabling dyskinesias who were scheduled to start apomorphine pump treatment underwent acute levodopa and apomorphine challenges at baseline and 6 months later. Video recordings involving motor tasks were rated blindly by two independent raters using modified AIMS and Goetz dyskinesia scales. At 6 months, mean apomorphine dose was 75.2 mg per day and the mean L-dopa dose had been reduced by 55%. Daily off time in patients' diaries was reduced by 38% (2.4 hours). The L-dopa challenges showed a reduction of 44% in AIMS and 40% in Goetz scores (both P < 0.01). Apomorphine challenges showed a reduction of 39% in AIMS and 36% in Goetz scores (both P < 0.01). Patients' self-assessment scores reflected these significant changes. Dyskinesia improvement correlated with reduction in oral medication and with the final apomorphine dose (P < 0.05). This prospective study confirms marked dyskinesia reduction on continuous subcutaneous apomorphine therapy, paralleled by reduced dyskinesias during dopaminergic challenge tests. Our findings support the concept that replacement of short-acting oral antiparkinsonian medication with continuous dopamine receptor stimulation may reverse, at least partially, the sensitization process believed to mediate the development of drug-induced dyskinesias in PD.     

Dopaminergic responsiveness to apomorphine after chronic treatment with subcutaneous lisuride infusion in Parkinson's disease

The aim of this study was to assess whether or not continuous infusion of lisuride in combination with intermittent levodopa-carbidopa administration was associated with tolerance. Intravenous apomorphine was given to four patients before initiation of chronic treatment with subcutaneous lisuride infusion and oral levodopa. The study was repeated under identical conditions after a mean of 18 months of treatment. In no case was the motor response induced by apomorphine infusion reduced as compared to baseline assessment. Choreic dyskinesias accompanying the "on" state were enhanced in all patients. These findings suggest that chronic continuous infusion of a dopamine agonist like lisuride, associated with oral levodopa, is not accompanied by tolerance or down-regulation of striatal dopaminergic receptors.     

Continuous apomorphine infusion and neuropsychiatric disorders: a controlled study in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease

Abstract. The aim of this study was to asses whether patients with Parkinsons disease (PD) develop cognitive and psychiatric complications more frequently during prolonged therapy with continuous apomorphine infusion compared with standard oral treatment. Thirty consecutive PD patients with severe motor fluctuations were included in the study. Twelve patients accepted the treatment with subcutaneous continuous apomorphine infusion, while the remaining 18 preferred to continue with oral dopaminergic therapy. The two groups were evaluated with neuropsychological, psychiatric, and motor tests at baseline and after 1 year. The off daily duration and the levodopa dosage were significantly reduced in infused patients. The neuropsychiatric assessment did not change in both groups compared with baseline, except for a significant improvement of mood in the apomorphine group.     

Intranasal apomorphine in parkinsonian on-off fluctuations.

The efficacy of intranasal apomorphine was assessed in seven patients with Parkinson's disease and severe levodopa (L-dopa)-related "off-period" disabilities. All patients responded favorably to treatment with intranasal apomorphine. The speed and the quality of motor response and the pharmacokinetic profile showed results similar to those seen after subcutaneous injection of apomorphine administered by insulin pen syringe. The simplicity in the technique of intranasal apomorphine administration was found to be superior by all patients.     

Sublingual administration of apomorphine in the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson disease]

Apomorphine, a mixed dopaminergic agonist was given sublingually to 12 patients with Parkinson's disease disabled by severe on-off fluctuations. The patient's mean age was 57 years and the duration of Parkinson's disease was 12 years. All patients were also given domperidone (60 mg/day). Apomorphine was administered as soon as the off periods appeared. On periods were observed in 11 patients, with a mean apomorphine dose of 40 mg for each administration (extremes values: 20-60 mg). One patient had no motor benefit after an apomorphine dose of 120 mg. The mean duration of daily off periods was reduced by 64 per cent in 11 patients, for a mean duration of 8 months (extremes values: 2-12 months). Four patients developed stomatitis or gingival edema and stopped treatment. This pilot study shows that sublingual apomorphine, during a mean period of 8 months, significantly decreases off periods in parkinsonian patients. Others studies are necessary to confirm these results.     

Motor response following repeated apomorphine administration is reduced in Parkinson's disease

Ten patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations under levodopa treatment were given repeated equal subcutaneous injections of apomorphine [minimal effective dose (MED)] in 1 day. The MED was defined as the dose of apomorphine necessary to induce at least 60% reduction of motor disability for a minimum period of 10 min. MED was found for each patient in previous study days. In eight a subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine was performed on a different day. Four patients with simple fluctuations ("wearing off") showed a progressive reduction of the motor response to apomorphine injections, but three of the four had a stable response (continuous "on") to apomorphine infusion. Six patients with complicated fluctuations also exhibited a decreasing response to successive apomorphine injections and often completely failed to respond to some of the boluses. The response to a subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine was unstable in three of four cases. These findings indicate that a reduction of striatal dopaminergic receptor sensitivity is associated with repeated "pulsatile" apomorphine administration in parkinsonian patients with oscillations of motor performance. It is suggested that altered regulation of dopaminergic receptor sensitivity following pulsatile stimulation with levodopa may be a relevant phenomenon in the pathogenesis of motor fluctuations in PD.     

Apomorphine infusion and the long-duration response to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease

The authors investigated the long-duration response to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease. Eight patients with advanced Parkinson's disease disabled by severe ON/OFF fluctuations treated by chronic daytime subcutaneous apomorphine infusion with supplemental oral levodopa were studied. On day 1, oral levodopa was withdrawn at 4:00 pm and on the following morning subcutaneous apomorphine infusion was continued at the same rate without levodopa therapy. While receiving apomorphine alone, seven of the eight patients turned ON, and their usual dyskinesias returned. The ON phase persisted for 60 to 100 minutes (mean, 185.7 minutes) but then, despite continued, constant-rate apomorphine infusion to stabilize plasma levels, switched to an OFF phase. The authors conclude that the clinical effect of apomorphine is sustained by levodopa long-duration response. This effect is probably the result of postsynaptic mechanisms. In patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, the long-duration response to levodopa is present although slightly diminished.     

Continuous dopaminergic stimulation—From theory to clinical practice

Patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) experience worsening motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Management options include deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS), subcutaneous apomorphine (in combination with oral levodopa) or continuous duodenal levodopa administration. We have used all three therapies at our clinic in Milan and report our experience. Apomorphine infusion reduced daily off time but did not improve dyskinesia; long-term treatment was associated with impulse control disorders. STN-DBS provided motor benefit, but was associated with behavioural changes including attempted suicide. Duodenal levodopa produced significant clinical benefit without behavioural changes and allowed patients to discontinue all other PD medications. Duodenal levodopa should be considered in PD patients with advanced disease.     

Apomorphine infusion in advanced Parkinson's patients with subthalamic stimulation contraindications

BackgroundThe efficacy of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (APO) has been evaluated in advanced Parkinson’s disease in several open-label studies but never in a population of patients for whom subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) was contraindicated.MethodsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cognitive safety of APO at 12-month follow-up in 23 advanced parkinsonian patients (mean age: 62.3 years; mean disease duration: 13.9 years) whose dopa-resistant axial motor symptoms and/or cognitive decline constituted contraindications for STN-DBS. Their motor and cognitive status were evaluated before APO and 12 months afterwards.ResultsAfter one year, patients expressed high levels of satisfaction, with a mean rating on the Visual Analog Scale of 52.8% under APO. Daily OFF time, recorded in a 24-h diary, was reduced by 36% and ON time improved by 48%. There was a significant reduction (?26%) in mean oral levodopa equivalent dose. Dopa-resistant axial symptoms and neuropsychological performance remained stable. No adverse event was noted and none of the patients needed to take clozapine at any time.ConclusionsAPO is both safe and effective in advanced parkinsonian patients with untreatable motor fluctuations, for whom STN-DBS is contraindicated due to dopa-resistant axial motor symptoms and/or cognitive decline. As such, it should be regarded as a viable alternative for these patients.     

Fluctuations and dyskinesias as early L-dopa-induced motor complications in severe Parkinsonian's patients

Daily fluctuations of motor performance and dyskinesias in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with levodopa represent a difficult challenge to our understanding. We report 10 patients diagnosed of severe PD (Hoehn and Yahr: III-IV/V) treated with levodopa (range of dose: 750-900 mg/day) in single drug therapy since their diagnosis (mean time of levodopatherapy: 4.8 2.4 months, range: 3-6 months). All patients developed motor complications within weeks to months after initiating L-dopatherapy. Two patients received an intravenous apomorphine infusion (mean dose: 8.5 mg/day) during a mean time of 7.5 hours, but motor complications persisted during the infusion in spite of continuous dopaminergic stimulus. The degree of nigrostriatal damage (disease severity) seems to be a very important risk factor for the development of treatment-related motor complications.     

Sublingual apomorphine in Parkinson's disease: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

The clinical response and the pharmacokinetic parameters of 3 mg subcutaneous (SC) and 30 mg sublingual (SL) apomorphine were compared in nine patients with Parkinson's disease. The magnitude of the motor responses (evaluated by tapping and walking tests and the Webster scale) was similar for SC and SL apomorphine. However, the onset to action was delayed after SL when compared with SC apomorphine. No significant difference was found in bioavailability (area under the curve: AUC) or peak plasma concentration (Cmax) between SC and SL apomorphine, whereas time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) was shorter after SC apomorphine. Eight other patients were treated for a mean time of 4 months with SL apomorphine with a significant reduction in daily "off" hours. However, four of these eight patients developed stomatitis after some weeks of treatment. These results indicated that (a) pharmacokinetics parallel the clinical response to SL apomorphine, (b) SL apomorphine can reduce severe off periods in parkinsonian patients when used chronically, and (c) its long-term use is limited by a severe side effect (stomatitis).     

Subcutaneous continuous apomorphine infusion in fluctuating patients with Parkinson's disease: long-term results

Fluctuations in motor disability and dyskinesias are the major problem in the long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Many authors and ourselves have shown that by giving patients a continuous infusion of levodopa it is possible to control motor fluctuations. Levodopa can be administered continuously only be intravenous, intragastric or intrajejunal delivery. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation an be achieved more easily by infusing dopamine agonists subcutaneously. Apomorphine is a potent water-soluble dopamine receptor agonist that has been shown to successfully control motor fluctuation when subcutaneously infused in complicated parkinsonian patients. We report the clinical data of 30 PD patients having at least five years of treatment with subcutaneous continuous apomorphine infusion.     

Comparison of apomorphine and levodopa infusions in four patients with Parkinson's disease with symptom fluctuations

Background – Motor fluctuations in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease may be successfully treated with subcutaneous apomorphine infusion or intraduodenal levodopa/carbidopa infusion. No comparative trials of these two alternatives were performed. Aims of the study – We present a subanalysis from a randomized crossover clinical trial where levodopa infusion as monotherapy was compared with any other combination of pharmacotherapy in fluctuating patients. Four patients used apomorphine infusion and oral levodopa in the comparator arm. The results of these four patients are presented in detail. Methods – The duration of the trial was 3 + 3 weeks. Patients were video‐recorded half‐hourly on two non‐consecutive days of both treatment arms. Blinded video ratings were used. Patient self‐assessments of motor function and quality‐of‐life (QoL) parameters were captured using an electronic diary. Results – Ratings in moderate to severe ‘off’ state ranged 0–44% on apomorphine infusion and 0–6% on levodopa infusion. Moderate to severe dyskinesias were not recorded in any of the treatments. QoL was reported to be improved in all patients on duodenal levodopa infusion. Conclusions – Monotherapy with duodenal infusion of levodopa was more efficacious and brought greater QoL than combination therapy with apomorphine infusion in these fluctuating patients.     

Motor features and response to oral levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease under continuous dopaminergic infusion or deep brain stimulation

Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) and continuous dopaminergic infusions (jejunal levodopa or subcutaneous apomorphine) are indicated in complicated Parkinson’s disease (PD), although it remains unsettled how they compare to each other. Methods: We investigated the daytime motor condition in patients with advanced PD under monotherapy with jejunal levodopa, subcutaneous apomorphine, or STN DBS and also measured the motor changes produced by an additional standard morning dose of levodopa. Motor performance was assessed with the UPDRS‐III, hand taps, the AIMS dyskinesia score and patients’ diaries. Outcome measures were time to best motor ‘on’ after start of morning treatment, daytime variability of motor condition, motor scores. Results: The time to ‘on’ was longest in the jejunal levodopa group. DBS and jejunal levodopa treatments produced stable motor conditions without appreciable ‘off’ episodes. Continuous apomorphine infusion was associated with the worst motor scores (UPDRS‐III and taps) and the most frequent off‐states. Jejunal levodopa infusion was associated with the highest AIMS scores. Addition of a levodopa dose produced shortening of time to ‘on’ and a transient motor improvement in the jejunal levodopa group without increase in dyskinesias; in the DBS and apomorphine groups, there was an increase in dyskinesias without changes in UPDRS‐III or taps. Conclusions: STN DBS provided adequate trade‐off between motor improvement and dyskinesia control, although dyskinesias could be elicited by adding oral levodopa. Jejunal levodopa infusion produced adequate motor improvement with slow time to ‘on’ and moderate dyskinesias. Apomorphine infusion produced insufficient motor control and negligible dyskinesias.     

Selecting deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies in advanced Parkinson’s disease: an evidence-based review

Motor complications in Parkinson’s disease (PD) result from the short half-life and irregular plasma fluctuations of oral levodopa. When strategies of providing more continuous dopaminergic stimulation by adjusting oral medication fail, patients may be candidates for one of three device-aided therapies: deep brain stimulation (DBS), continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion, or continuous duodenal/jejunal levodopa/carbidopa pump infusion (DLI). These therapies differ in their invasiveness, side-effect profile, and the need for nursing care. So far, very few comparative studies have evaluated the efficacy of the three device-aided therapies for specific motor problems in advanced PD. As a result, neurologists currently lack guidance as to which therapy could be most appropriate for a particular PD patient. A group of experts knowledgeable in all three therapies reviewed the currently available literature for each treatment and identified variables of clinical relevance for choosing one of the three options such as type of motor problems, age, and cognitive and psychiatric status. For each scenario, pragmatic and (if available) evidence-based recommendations are provided as to which patients could be candidates for either DBS, DLI, or subcutaneous apomorphine.     

Patient profile,indications, efficacy and safety of duodenal levodopa infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease

The studies of duodenal infusion of a levodopa on small groups of parkinsonian patients have reported beneficial effects on motor complications. However, little is known about the patient profile and indications for duodenal levodopa infusion. The purpose of this study is to exhaustively investigate the clinical characteristics of the population and indication, efficacy and tolerability of duodenal levodopa infusion in natural care settings. Of the 102 patients treated with duodenal levodopa infusion since 2003, 91 were enrolled in a multicentre retrospective study. The mean age was 72.7 years, with average disease duration of 17 years. Patients were at advanced stage: 91% had gait disorders, 65% had visual hallucinations, and 50% were demented (MMSE: 23). Duodenal levodopa infusion was the last line of treatment for motor complications in 98% of the patients, due to failure of or contraindication for apomorphine pump and neurosurgical treatments. Long‐term treatment was observed by 73% of the population. Of these, >90% reported an improvement in motor fluctuations, quality of life, and autonomy. There were few severe adverse events. Technical problems were commonplace. Duodenal levodopa infusion seems to be an effective last‐line therapy for motor complications in Parkinson's disease. Hence, technical improvements and earlier introduction should be considered. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society.     

Subcutaneous apomorphine in late stage Parkinson's disease: a long term follow up

OBJECTIVES—Despite the recent introduction of newperoral drugs as well as neurosurgical methods for Parkinson'sdisease, treatment of late stage parkinsonian patients remainsdifficult and many patients become severely handicapped because offluctuations in their motor status. Injections and infusions ofapomorphine has been suggested as an alternative in the treatment ofthese patients, but the number of studies describing the effects ofsuch a treatment over longer time periods is still limited. Theobjective was to investigate the therapeutic response and range of sideeffects during long term treatment with apomorphine in advancedParkinson's disease.
METHODS—Forty nine patients (30 men, 19 women; agerange 42-80 years) with Parkinson's disease were treated for 3 to 66 months with intermittent subcutaneous injections or continuousinfusions of apomorphine.
RESULTS—Most of the patients experienced a longterm symptomatic improvement. The time spent in "off" wassignificantly reduced from 50 to 29.5% with injections and from 50 to25% with infusions of apomorphine. The quality of the remaining"off" periods was improved with infusion treatment, but wasrelatively unaffected by apomorphine injections. The overall frequencyand intensity of dyskinesias did not change. The therapeutic effects ofapomorphine were stable over time. The most common side effect waslocal inflammation at the subcutaneous infusion site,whereas the most severe were psychiatric side effects occurring in 44%of the infusion and 12% of the injection treated patients.
CONCLUSION—Subcutaneous apomorphine is a highlyeffective treatment which can substantially improve the symptomatologyin patients with advanced stage Parkinson's disease over a prolongedperiod of time.

     

Dopaminergic modulation of visual-spatial working memory in Parkinson's disease

Visual-spatial working memory (WM) impairment is frequently associated with the early stage of Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a group of PD patients in visual-spatial and visual-object WM tasks and to investigate the effect of administering the dopaminergic agonist apomorphine (experiment 1) or the dopamine precursor L-dopa (experiment 2) on the performance of tests assessing these functions. To study WM processes, the PD patients and age-matched normal controls were given an n-back task paradigm. In both experiments, the PD patients were submitted to two evaluations: one after a 12-hour therapy washout and the other 15 min after a subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine (average 0.04 mg/kg) or 20/30 min after L-dopa intake (200 mg p.o.). The apomorphine infusion had a worsening effect on reaction times in both visual-spatial and visual-object WM tasks, but it did not influence performance accuracy. Instead, L-dopa administration had a ameliorative effect on accuracy and reaction times in both visual-spatial and visual-object tasks. These results highlight the role of dopamine in the modulation of the WM function in PD patients.     

Continuous subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Apomorphine administered by subcutaneous infusion has been used efficiently in parkinsonian patients to treat severe motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Despite increasing evidence of its efficacy and its relative safety, apomorphine infusion therapy is still underused. This article reviews pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, tolerability and indications of apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease.     

Sublingual apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease complicated by motor fluctuations.

Subcutaneous apomorphine is a useful treatment for refractory motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. We have now clinically evaluated a formulation of sublingual apomorphine (57 mg) and performed preliminary pharmacokinetic studies. In acute studies, all 10 patients switched "on" after a mean latency of 25 min with a mean duration of motor benefit of 118 min. In three patients followed for a mean of 4.7 months, we have shown that chronic sublingual use can be effective, safe, and convenient in controlling motor fluctuations. The pattern of clinical response followed closely the plasma profile of apomorphine with a mean Cmax of 76 pmol/ml (50-106 pmol/ml) and a mean Tmax of 60 min (45-80 min), with moderate interpatient variability in bioavailability. Sublingual apomorphine is a practical alternative to subcutaneous use in selected patients with severe motor fluctuations.