A phase I study of chronic daily dosing of oral etoposide in combination with cisplatin for patients with advanced cancer

A dose escalation study of daily oral etoposide and cisplatin was carried out on 22 patients with advanced cancer using starting doses of 20 mg/m2/d of etoposide given orally for 21 days and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin given intravenously (IV) on day 1. A total of 40 courses were given. Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity, with a maximum tolerated dose of 50 mg/m2/d of oral etoposide for 21 days plus 80 mg/m2 of IV cisplatin on day 1. Doses of 40 mg/m2/d of etoposide for 21 days plus 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin for 1 day in four of eight courses (50%) were associated with Grade 3 or worse leukopenia that occurred between days 18 and 26. However, no Grade 3 or worse thrombocytopenia occurred at this dose level. Nausea and vomiting occurred in most patients at each dose level but were mild and could be controlled by antiemetics. Alopecia also occurred frequently. Significant mucositis (Grade 4) occurred in one patient, but no other toxicities were observed. Four partial responses that lasted from 1.3 to 5.8+ months were observed in patients with cervical (one patient), small cell lung (one patient), and squamous cell lung cancer (two patients); one of them had been heavily pretreated with platin analogue-containing regimens. The recommended doses for Phase II studies on this schedule are 40 mg/m2/d of oral etoposide for 21 days plus 80 mg/m2 of IV cisplatin on day 1. A combination regimen on this schedule seems particularly effective in patients with etoposide-sensitive malignancies.     

局限期小细胞肺癌加速超分割放疗同步EP方案化疗的剂量递增I期研究

背景与目的加速超分割放疗（每日两次方案）联合EP方案同步化疗是美国国立综合癌症网络（Na-tional Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN）指南推荐的局限期小细胞肺癌的标准治疗方式,但国人对EP方案标准化疗剂量耐受性尚不明确。本研究旨在探讨局限期小细胞肺癌同步放化疗EP方案的最大耐受剂量。方法研究纳入病理证实的局限期小细胞肺癌患者,进行加速超分割放疗同步EP方案（依托泊苷+顺铂）化疗,放疗处方剂量为45 Gy/30 f,1.5 Gy/f,每日两次,同一日两次放疗间隔时间≥6 h,5天/周,共3周完成。化疗方案采用依托泊苷联合顺铂,每21天为1周期,具体依托泊苷100 mg/m2,d1-d3,顺铂采用剂量递增的方式（第1组为70 mg/m2 d1,第2组为75 mg/m2 d1）。主要观察指标为治疗期间的血液学毒性。次要观察指标为非血液学毒性和1年总生存期（overall sur-vival, OS）、无进展生存期（progression free survival, PFS）。根据不良事件常用术语评定标准（Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, NCI-CTCAE）4.0,最大耐受剂量设定为6例患者中不超过1例患者出现剂量限制毒性（4级血液学毒性）的剂量,同时下一剂量组6例患者至少2例出现剂量限制性毒性。结果研究共纳入20例局限期小细胞肺癌患者,平均年龄49.50（30-68）岁。第1组入组6例患者,1例患者出现4度中性粒细胞减少;后第2组入组14例患者,1例患者出现4度中性粒细胞减少。其中,第1组有4例患者出现≥3度血液学毒性,1例患者出现3度以上放射性食管炎;第2组有10例患者出现≥3度血液学毒性,无患者出现3度以上放射性食管炎。中位随访9.0个月（3.2个月-36.2个月）,1年OS、PFS分别为91%、62%。结论局限期小细胞肺癌患者采用加速超分割放疗联合EP方案化疗将顺铂剂量递增至75 mg/m2是安全的,其有效性还需要进一步扩大样本量和随访更长的时间来证实。     

A phase I study of gemcitabine/cisplatin/etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of combined cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine in patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We undertook a phase I study in patients with either extensive small-cell lung cancer with or without prior chemotherapy, or limited disease who had progressed or recurred despite prior treatment. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50-100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 followed by oral administration of 50-100 mg/m2 days 2 5, and gemcitabine at either 800 or 1000 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, on a 3 weekly cycle. RESULTS: We treated 20 patients, 14 at the 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine dose level, and six at the 1000 mg/m2 dose level. The protocol initially used an etoposide dose of 100 mg/m2 etoposide daily (i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5), but the first two patients died of septic complications. With reduction of the etoposide dose to 50 mg/m2 daily x 5, the regimen was well tolerated. At this etoposide dose, neutropenia, mucositis, and gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in one patient at each of the two gemcitabine dose levels. In addition, one patient receiving gemcitabine at the 1000 mg/m2 level experienced a possible allergic reaction. The overall response rate was 54%. Patients on gemcitabine at the 800 mg/m2 level who had not received prior chemotherapy had the highest response rate, at 75%. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses for this regimen are cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Future trials should further examine the optimal relative doses and schedule of gemcitabine and etoposide.     

A phase I trial of a 5-day schedule of intravenous topotecan and etoposide in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer

A phase I dose-escalation study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the intravenous combination of topotecan and etoposide in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Nineteen patients were treated with 30-min infusions of topotecan (0.5 mg/m(2)/day for cohort 1; 0.75 mg/m(2)/day for cohort 2) followed by 1-hour infusions of a fixed daily dose of etoposide (60 mg/m(2)/day) for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Patient cohort 1 (n = 7) received a total of 41 courses of chemotherapy. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred after 17% of the courses of therapy, and there was 1 episode of dose-limiting toxicity in this patient cohort. In patient cohort 2 (n = 12), a total of 64 courses of chemotherapy were administered. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred following 41 and 37% of the courses of therapy, respectively. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred following 19% of the courses of therapy, and there were 3 episodes of dose-limiting toxicity in this patient cohort. There were no toxic deaths, and all nonhematologic toxicity (except hair loss) was 相似文献   

Phase I trial of concurrent thoracic radiation and continuous infusion cisplatin and etoposide in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Although combined modality therapy appears to be superior to radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal treatment regimen has not been determined. We designed this trial to determine the maximal tolerated doses (MTD) of continuous intravenous infusion (CI) cisplatin and etoposide that could be administered concurrently with thoracic irradiation. METHODS: 19 patients with stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were treated at three different dose levels of CI cisplatin and etoposide with concurrent single daily fraction thoracic radiotherapy to 4500 cGy. This chemoradiotherapy phase of treatment was followed by a 1500-2000 cGy radiotherapy boost and three cycles of standard intermittent bolus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3. RESULTS: The MTD of CI chemotherapy was determined to be cisplatin 5 mg/m2/day plus etoposide 18 mg/m2/day for 5 days per week over 5 weeks along with thoracic irradiation. Overall, 37% of patients required breaks in the chemoradiotherapy course and 32% required attenuation of the planned duration of CI chemotherapy. Only 42% of patients received all three planned cycles of bolus chemotherapy and 16% received < 6000 cGy of thoracic irradiation. The major toxicities during concurrent chemoradiotherapy were grade 3-4 esophagitis (42%) and myelosuppression (47%). Subsequent chemotherapy was complicated by grade 3-4 myelosuppression in 38% of patients. An objective response was documented in 58% of patients (CR 11%, PR 47%). Median survival was 18 months with 2- and 5-year survival rates of 42 and 11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that CI cisplatin and etoposide can be administered safely to patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and that such potentially radiosensitizing strategies deserve further evaluation in this setting.     

Pilot phase II trial of high-dose etoposide combined with cisplatin in the treatment of refractory lung cancer]

The efficacy of combined high-dose etoposide with standard dose cisplatin was evaluated in patients who had refractory lung cancer after standard chemotherapy. Each patient was given etoposide at 500 mg/m2/day on day 1 to 3 continuously (total dose 1,500 mg/m2) and cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 on day 1. Fifteen patients (7 adenocarcinoma, 5 small cell lung cancer, 2 squamous cell lung cancer and 1 sarcoma, which latter was difficult to distinguish from giant cell carcinoma) were entered in this study. The overall response was 41.7% (5 of 12); five partial response, 6 no change, and 1 progressive disease. Three treatment-related deaths were observed; one resulted from sepsis and two from respiratory failure because of tumor progression. All of the patients developed severe myelosuppression; the mean nadir white blood cell count was 400, and the mean nadir platelet count was 24,000 in 28 evaluable courses. The range of maximum concentration of etoposide determined by HPLC was from 17.4 to 39.1 micrograms/ml. These results suggest that high-dose etoposide combined with a standard dose of cisplatin is effective against refractory lung cancer.     

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

The phase I study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of weekly administered docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a dose escalation study, 22 patients, under 75 years old, with unresectable and metastatic untreated NSCLC with performance status (0-1) were enrolled. Patients were treated with cisplatin (day 1) and weekly docetaxel (days 1, 8, 15). Dose escalation levels in mg/m(2) were for cisplatin and docetaxel; 70 and 15 (level 1), 80 and 15 (level 2), 80 and 20 (level 3), 80 and 25 (level 4), 80 and 30 (level 5), respectively. Chemotherapy was repeated for at least two cycles every 28 days. All patients were assessable for toxicities. Although grade 3 neutropenia occurred in one case in level 4, there were no significant modifications of chemotherapy schedule until level 4. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in all cases receiving level 5. One patient developed an infection, and two had incomplete recovery of neutropenia by the 28th day after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Nonhematological toxicities, including nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and hypersensitivity reaction, were tolerable. However, one case developed severe hyponatremia. Among 21 patients evaluable for response, eight cases achieved partial response, thus the overall response was 39%. Weekly administration of docetaxel at 25 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) is recommended for phase II studies. The responses observed in the present study suggest an identical high degree of activity against NSCLC with less hematotoxicity compared with a standard schedule of cisplatin and docetaxel.     

Retreatment with dose-dense weekly cisplatin after previous cisplatin chemotherapy is not complicated by significant neuro-toxicity

Cisplatin induces a cumulative dose-dependent axonal sensory neuropathy. With a cumulative dose over 600 mg/m2, a significant percentage of patients will develop a moderate or severe neuropathy. We retreated patients with progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer after previous platinum-containing chemotherapy with weekly 50-70 mg/m2 cisplatin for six cycles. This group was prospectively followed for the development of neuropathy. Patients received six weekly cycles of either 50 or 70 mg/m2 cisplatin, combined with oral etoposide. Responding patients continued treatment with daily oral etoposide for nine months. Neurological toxicity was assessed with a sensory sum score, the sensory neuropathy common toxicity criteria (CTC) and quantitated sensory analysis of the vibration perception threshold (VPT). Neurological assessment was scheduled at baseline, after three cycles, at the end of cisplatin chemotherapy and at 3 monthly intervals until 1 year after the discontinuation of chemotherapy. The first evaluation carried out in the interval of 1-4 months after the end of weekly cisplatin therapy was taken as the principle evaluation for neurotoxicity because during this time interval the nadir of cisplatin neurotoxicity is to be expected. Of 89 patients evaluated for neurological toxicity, 80 patients were fully evaluable. Forty-nine had received prior cisplatin (median cumulative dosage 450 mg/m2); the others had received prior treatment with carboplatin. Cisplatin pretreated patients had slightly higher neuropathy scores at the start of weekly cisplatin. Almost all cisplatin pretreated patients received six cycles of cisplatin, 29 at 50 mg/m2 and 20 at 70 mg/m2 per cycle. Despite treatment up to an overall cumulative dose of 750-900 mg/m2 cisplatin, only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to neurotoxicity. One other patient developed a grade 3 neuropathy during follow-up. Only a marginal increase of neuropathic signs and symptoms were observed in all the other patients. In multiple regression analysis, the increase in VPT or the sensory sum score was not related to prior treatment (cisplatin or carboplatin). Patients with mild signs of neuropathy after prior treatment with cisplatin to a cumulative dose level of 400-450 mg/m2 can be retreated with weekly cisplatin to a cumulative dose of 420 mg/m2 (overall cumulative dose up to 800-900 mg/m2) with only a minimal risk of significant neurotoxicity.     

Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial.

PURPOSE: Treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy provides a modest survival advantage over supportive care alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To determine whether a new agent, paclitaxel, would further improve survival in NSCLC, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a randomized trial comparing paclitaxel plus cisplatin to a standard chemotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin and etoposide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out by a multi-institutional cooperative group in chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients randomized to receive paclitaxel plus cisplatin or etoposide plus cisplatin. Paclitaxel was administered at two different dose levels (135 mg/m(2) and 250 mg/m(2)), and etoposide was given at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) daily on days 1 to 3. Each regimen was repeated every 21 days and each included cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: The characteristics of the 599 patients were well-balanced across the three treatment groups. Superior survival was observed with the combined paclitaxel regimens (median survival time, 9.9 months; 1-year survival rate, 38.9%) compared with etoposide plus cisplatin (median survival time, 7.6 months; 1-year survival rate, 31.8%; P =. 048). Comparing survival for the two dose levels of paclitaxel revealed no significant difference. The median survival duration for the stage IIIB subgroup was 7.9 months for etoposide plus cisplatin patients versus 13.1 months for all paclitaxel patients (P =.152). For the stage IV subgroup, the median survival time for etoposide plus cisplatin was 7.6 months compared with 8.9 months for paclitaxel (P =.246). With the exceptions of increased granulocytopenia on the low-dose paclitaxel regimen and increased myalgias, neurotoxicity, and, possibly, increased treatment-related cardiac events with high-dose paclitaxel, toxicity was similar across all three arms. Quality of life (QOL) declined significantly over the 6 months. However, QOL scores were not significantly different among the regimens. CONCLUSION: As a result of these observations, paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2)) combined with cisplatin has replaced etoposide plus cisplatin as the reference regimen in our recently completed phase III trial.     

Multicenter phase II trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide with concurrent radiation for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of adding paclitaxel to cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received five courses of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 1-hour intravenous [IV] infusion day 1; cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) IV day 1; etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV day 1; oral etoposide 100 mg bid days 2 to 5) at 3-week intervals. TRT (42 Gy administered in 15 fractions) was administered concurrent with chemotherapy cycle 3. All patients were evaluated before starting TRT and 4 weeks after termination of chemotherapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) were administered prophylactic cranial irradiation. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included, and the median age was 63 years. The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 19 to 57 months). The overall response rate was 92% (CR, 81%; partial response, 11%), and the median survival was 21 months. The 1- and 2-year disease-specific survival rates were 69% and 37%, respectively. Of 29 CR patients, 83% have relapsed. Brain metastasis was as frequent as local recurrences (42%). Hematologic toxicity included grade 3 to 4 leukopenia in 74% of patients and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 10%. One treatment-related death occurred as a result of severe neutropenia and septicemia. Hematotoxicity caused dose reductions in 31% of courses. One patient had an anaphylactic reaction during the first paclitaxel infusion. Paclitaxel-related neuropathy and myalgia were reversible. Grade 3 esophagitis was seen in five patients during and shortly after TRT. CONCLUSION: This novel multimodal regimen is effective and well tolerated in patients with LD-SCLC. It compares favorably with previously published phase II studies.     

Etoposide admixed with cisplatin. Phase I clinical investigation of 72-hour infusion

The compatibility of etoposide (VP-16-213) and cisplatin (CDDP) in an admixture solution was established by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) studies in vitro at room temperature. A Phase I dual-dose escalation study of the admixture was subsequently carried out utilizing a 24-hour continuous infusion schedule administered for 3 consecutive days and repeated at 3 to 4 week intervals. Twenty-seven patients received a total of 42 treatment courses. The daily dose rates for VP-16-213 were 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2/day. Cisplatin was delivered at 20, 30, and 40 mg/m2/day for each dose level of VP-16-213. Dose-rate limiting toxicity was observed first at the VP-16 dose of 50 mg/m2/day and CDDP at 30 mg/m2/day. At 100 mg/m2/day for VP-16-213, six of 17 courses were associated with life-threatening leukopenia and four of six patients died with sepsis. All but one of the patients developing severe or life-threatening leukopenia had associated acute renal failure with serum creatinine levels greater than 2 mg/dl. The optimal dose rate of delivery for VP-16 and CDDP administered as a 72-hour infusion admixture is 75 mg/m2/day and 30 mg/m2/day, respectively.     

Study of paclitaxel, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy combined with twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9609 phase II study.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival, and toxicity of paclitaxel, etoposide, and cisplatin combined with accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-disease (LD) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: LD-SCLC patients with measurable disease, Karnofsky performance score of > or = 70, and adequate organ function who were previously untreated were eligible for the study. Treatment was as follows. In cycle 1 of chemotherapy, concurrent thoracic radiation therapy was administered. In cycles 2 to 4, chemotherapy was administered alone. In cycle 1, chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) intravenous over 3 hours on day 1, etoposide 60 mg/m(2) intravenous on day 1 and 80 mg/m(2) orally on days 2 and 3, and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenous on day 1. In cycles 2 to 4, the paclitaxel dose was increased to 175 mg/m(2), with the etoposide and cisplatin doses remaining the same as in cycle 1. The thoracic radiation therapy consisted of 1.5 Gy in 30 fractions (total dose, 45 Gy) administered 5 days a week for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled onto the study, and 53 were assessable. The major toxicities included grade 3 and 4 acute neutropenia (32% and 43%, respectively) and grade 3 and 4 esophagitis (32% and 4%, respectively). Two patients died as a result of therapy (one died of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and one died of sepsis). There was one late fatal pulmonary toxicity. The median survival time was 24.7 months. The 2-year survival rate was 54.7%. The median progression-free survival time was 13 months, with a 2-year progression-free survival rate of 26.4%. CONCLUSION: Although this therapeutic regimen is effective in the treatment of patients with LD-SCLC, it is unlikely that the three-drug combination with thoracic radiation therapy will improve the survival times compared with the etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen with thoracic radiation therapy in LD-SCLC patients.     

Two-drug therapy in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors.

Eighty-two patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT) treated with two-drug therapy consisting of etoposide and cisplatin were evaluated for late relapse. Good-risk GCT was defined using Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. Etoposide was given at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and cisplatin was given at 20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5; therapy was recycled at 21 days with delays up to 7 days for a leukocyte count of less than 3000/microliters or a platelet count of less than 100,000/microliters. Drug doses were not attenuated for myelosuppression. Seventy-six of 82 evaluable patients achieved a complete response (CR). Seventy-two patients had a CR to chemotherapy alone. Forty-six (56%) patients had excision of residual abnormalities: 11 had teratoma in the resected specimen, 31 had necrotic debris or fibrosis, and 4 had a CR after chemotherapy plus complete excision of residual viable GCT. Six patients had an incomplete response to chemotherapy; one of these patients had unresectable mature teratoma and remains progression-free. The median etoposide dose (+/- standard deviation [SD]) was 500 mg/m2/course (+/- 35 mg/m2) and the median cisplatin dose (+/- SD) was 100 mg/m2/course (+/- 6 mg/m2). Nine patients experienced a relapse at 6 to 17.5 months; two patients with nonseminomatous GCT were salvaged by chemotherapy and one patient with seminoma was salvaged by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The three patients who were salvaged by additional therapy are disease-free at 59 to 63 months. Seventy-one patients (87%) remain disease-free with a median follow-up time of 63 months (range, 33 to 92 months). No relapses have occurred beyond 17.5 months. Etoposide and cisplatin therapy at these doses and schedule results in durable CR without late relapse.     

Phase I study of weekly alternating therapy with irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin for patients with small-cell lung cancer

The combination of IP (irinotecan/cisplatin) has been shown to confer a survival benefit compared with EP (etoposide/cisplatin) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Based on this and potential synergy from sequential inhibition of topoisomerases I and II, we conducted a phase I study to assess the feasibility of weekly therapy alternating IP and EP. The doses of EP were fixed (etoposide 60 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on day 1). The dose of irinotecan was escalated in serial cohorts at 3 dose levels: 80, 90, and 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given on days 2-5 and days 4-7 after IP and EP, respectively. Patients with limited-stage SCLC received chemoradiation during weeks 4-6 with etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and thoracic radiation 1.5 Gy twice daily in 30 fractions. Patients received 12 weeks of therapy. To evaluate dose escalation in subsequent cohorts, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was initially assessed during weeks 1-3 of treatment. Characteristics of the 18 patients accrued are as follows: performance status 0/1, n = 9; female sex, n = 9; extended-stage SCLC, n = 16; and median age, 53 years. Four patients treated at irinotecan dose level 1 (80 mg/m2), 6 patients at dose level 2 (90 mg/m2), and 6 patients at dose level 3 (100 mg/m2) did not experience DLT in weeks 1-4 and completed therapy without major incident. The only 2 patients to experience DLT during weeks 1-4 were treated at dose level 2. Both were hospitalized during week 4 and subsequently died. However, patients had already been accrued at dose level 3 and tolerated therapy well. Therefore, the trial design was modified to assess DLT during weeks 1-4, and additional patients were cautiously added to the dose level 2 and 3 cohorts. Analysis of summary toxicity data resulted in a recommendation that dose level 3 be used in phase II based on the probability of DLT of 16% (95% CI, 3%-29%). Responses in 16 evaluable patients include complete response in 1 patient, partial response in 14 patients, and minor response in 1 patient. With the exception of the 2 deaths, the therapy was well tolerated and active. Phase II evaluation of the regimen in patients with extensive-stage SCLC is ongoing.     

Combination phase I trial of a novel oral fluorouracil derivative S-1 with low-dose cisplatin for unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer (JFMC27-9902).

PURPOSE: The Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer conducted a Phase I study of a novel oral fluorouracil derivative, S-1, combined with a low dose of cisplatin in unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: S-1 was administered orally at 80-120 mg/body/day, depending on body surface area. One course consisted of consecutive administration for 28 days followed by a rest of 14 days. Low-dose cisplatin was given i.v. on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of each course. The dose escalation of cisplatin began with an initial dose of 1 mg/m(2)/day as level 1 and was stepped up to 2, 3, 4, and 6 mg/m(2)/day as level 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The regimen was repeated for at least two courses. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients was entered in the study. There was no treatment-related death. At level 5, consisting of 5 evaluable patients, dose-limiting toxicity was experienced as grade 3 appetite loss in 2 patients and grade 4 neutropenia in 1 patient. The maximum-tolerated dose of cisplatin was estimated to be 6 mg/m(2)/day. We decided on a recommended dose of cisplatin of 4 mg/m(2)/day because the dosage was one level under the maximum-tolerated dose. All 3 patients at level 4 showed partial response, suggesting promising clinical efficacy with this dosage. The serum concentration of cisplatin at level 4 was 918 +/- 92 ng/ml on day 26 of the first course. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 with low-dose cisplatin may become an effective regimen with acceptable toxicity for gastric cancer.     

Pharmacokinetics of an etoposide infused over three days: concomitant infusion with cisplatin.

The pharmacokinetics of a 72-hour infusion of 240 mg/m2 etoposide administered concurrently with 90 mg/m2 cisplatin was studied in 12 lung cancer patients. The area under the curve (AUC), elimination half-life, steady state concentration, systemic clearance, renal clearance of etoposide and distribution volume at steady state were 225.4 +/- 39.2 micrograms x h/ml, 8.1 +/- 3.4 h, 3.1 +/- 0.6 micrograms/ml, 18.8 +/- 3.1 ml/min/m2, 3.1 +/- 1.4 ml/min/m2, 9.6 +/- 3.8 l/m2, respectively, which were in accordance with those reported previously in patients treated with etoposide alone. Although concentration at 24 hours, total bilirubin level and total protein level were correlated with the AUC which in turn correlated with hematologic toxicity, the variables were not predictive of hematologic toxicity. We conclude that the concomitant administration of cisplatin at a dose level of 30 mg/m2/day might not affect the pharmacokinetics of prolonged etoposide infusion.     

连续二次大剂量化疗联合活化的造血干细胞和免疫细胞移植治疗难治性非小细胞肺癌

在LAK细胞对胃癌细胞KATOⅢ的杀伤过程中,加入单克隆抗体MGb2能产生明显协同作用。推测此作用的原理是抗体依赖细胞介导的细胞毒性作用(ADCC)。此作用随着制备LAK细胞时白细胞介素2(IL-2)浓度的增加而增高,与LAK活性呈平行关系;制备LAK细胞时,IL-2的诱导时间既影响LAK活性,也影响相应的ADCC作用。     

Phase I trial of high-dose etoposide, high-dose cisplatin, and reinfusion of autologous bone marrow for lung cancer

We undertook a phase I trial using fixed-dose cisplatin, escalating doses of etoposide, and reinfusion of previously obtained autologous bone marrow in 29 relapsed or refractory small cell and non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Median age was 59 years (range of 38-68 years). Three patients had small-cell and 26 patients had non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients received i.v. cisplatin 200 mg/m2 over 5 days and i.v. etoposide 600 mg/m2/day for 3 days (total of 1,800 mg/m2) that was escalated to 800, 1,000, 1,200, 1,400, and 1,600 mg/m2/day for 3 days (total of 2,400-4,800 mg/m2). Cryopreserved autologous bone marrow was thawed and reinfused through a central venous catheter the second day after the completion of chemotherapy. Toxicities included nausea, vomiting, alopecia, high-tone hearing loss, mucositis, diarrhea, renal insufficiency, metabolic acidosis, and severe myelosuppression. The duration of neutropenia (less than 500 neutrophils/microliter) ranged from 5 to 22 days (median of 11 days) and the duration of severe thrombocytopenia (platelets of less than 20,000/microliters untransfused) ranged from 2 to 19 days (median of 9 days). Reversible renal insufficiency (peak serum creatinines of 6.7, 6.6, 4.3, and 3.5 mg/dl) occurred in four patients who completed the therapy. In three patients, death occurred within 4 weeks of chemotherapy and marrow reinfusion. Three complete and 12 partial remissions (range of 1+(-)22+ months, median of 3 months) were observed. No response was noted in eight patients and tumor progression within 1 month of transplant occurred in two patients. The maximally tolerated dose of etoposide was 1,400 mg/m2/day (total of 4,200 mg/m2), since two of three patients developed life-threatening diarrhea at the 1,600 mg/m2/day (total of 4,800 mg/m2) dose. The encouraging antitumor effects of this regimen suggest that this approach may be useful therapy for lung cancer and other tumors sensitive to VP-16 and cisplatin.     

Significance and effects of intraperitoneal cisplatin administration for ovarian cancer

We studied the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy in which a high-dose platinum agent was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) plus intravenously (i.v.) to 22 patients with stage III ovarian cancer. The chemotherapy consisted of etoposide (i.p.), cisplatin (i.p.), and carboplatin (i.v.). Each course was repeated every 4 weeks and a maximum of 5 courses was given in the 6 months following the initial surgery. As a control, 13 patients received different chemotherapy (CAP etc.) in which cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin pirarubicin hydrochloride were administered. The mean (SD) total dose of cisplatin in the patient group group (790.6 +/- 317.0 mg/m2) over the 6 months was significantly higher than in the control group (377.2 +/- 215.1 mg/m2). The overall response rate (CR + PR) 6 months after the completion (95.5%) was significantly higher in the study patients than in the control group (53.1%). The 1, 3, 5-year survival rates were significantly higher in the EPJ group (91.0, 59.0, 42.1%) than in the control group (53.8, 15.4, 15.4%). There was no significant difference in renal toxicity or bone marrow suppression (leukopenia and thrombocytopenia) between the two groups. EPJ therapy allowed an increased dose of cisplatin in the treatment of ovarian cancer without enhancing renal toxicity, resulting in higher response and survival rates. This study demonstrated that this therapy is an effective and well-tolerated regimen.     

Tolerability and efficacy of GM-CSF [Leucomax] in patients with small cell lung cancer treated with intensive chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of Leucomax (Sandoz/Schering Plough) used for neutropenia in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with etoposide and cisplatin. The potential influence of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on chemotherapy relative dose intensity (RDI) was also evaluated. The chemotherapy used was the following, cisplatin 50 mg m^-2 i.v. 1 and 7 day, etoposide 170 mg m^-2 i.v. 3-5 days, q 3-4 weeks. Patients received a median of six cycles (range 2-8) over 4-36 weeks (median: 20). Thirty-two consecutive patients were treated, six were excluded. Eleven patients received GM-CSF 5 /zg kg"1 s.c. due to absolute neutrophil count (ANC), 1000/mm3 until recovery (ANC > 2000 mm3) or during 7 days, and thereafter prophylactically 24 hours post subsequent chemotherapy cycles for 7 days. Four patients received single GM-CSF course during the terminal disease phase. In 11 patients, there was no neutropenia requiring GM-CSF during the whole treatment course. Toxicity of chemotherapy was high, including thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anaemia, mucositis, fever and hypotension. GM-CSF toxicity was the following, first dose reaction - one patient, local erythema - two patients, arthralgia - one patient, hypotension, chills, fever requiring GM-CSF discontinuation one patient RDI of cisplatin/etoposide was 0.77/0.62 in GM-CSF group, and 0.90/ 0.80 in patients who didn’t receive Leucomax. Overall objective response rate to chemotherapy and complete response rate were 80% (21/26), 26% (7/26) and median survival of all patients was 10 months. Median disease free survival was 8 months. Four patients are alive, two patients lost during progression, 20 died. Administration of GM-CSF did not appear to improve RDI of chemotherapy, overall response rate (RR) nor survival in this phase I/II clinical study. RDI of chemotherapy was reduced in patients receiving GM-CSF due to thrombocytopenia and/or extrahaematologic toxicity of chemotherapy.