Enhanced eradication of Helicobacter pylori by pre- versus post-prandial amoxycillin suspension with omeprazole: implications for antibiotic delivery

Background : Strategies to improve antibiotic treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection are hampered by lack of knowledge about the route of antibiotic delivery. Post-prandial dosing with antibiotics prolongs their gastric residence time and improves their intragastric distribution, leading to improved local delivery compared with pre-prandial dosing. We aimed to assess whether pre- or post-prandial dosing with amoxycillin suspension was more effective for H. pylori eradication in an amoxycillin/omeprazole regimen.
Methods : Seventy-nine patients with H. pylori infection were treated with omeprazole 40 mg o.m. for 28 days and amoxycillin suspension 500 mg q.d.s. for days 15–28, the amoxycillin being randomized to either 1 h before or immediately after food.
Results : The H. pylori eradication rate, for those completing the trial, was 67% (22/33) when amoxycillin suspension was given pre-prandially, compared with 39% (15/38) when it was given post-prandially ( P <0.05). Good compliance was achieved, with H. pylori eradication in 59% (28/46) of good compliers compared with 36% (9/25) of others completing the protocol ( P <0.05).
Conclusion : When given with omeprazole, pre-prandial dosing with amoxycillin suspension is more effective for H. pylori eradication than post-prandial dosing. This is consistent with the hypothesis that systemic rather than local delivery of amoxycillin is important for H. pylori eradication.     

Randomized study comparing omeprazole plus amoxycillin versus omeprazole plus clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background : Dual therapy with omeprazole plus amoxycillin or with omeprazole plus clarithromycin has been proposed for eradication of Helicobacter pylori . The main problem is the great variability in the rate of eradication.
Methods : A group of 287 consecutive patients with active peptic ulcers and H. pylori infections were admitted to a prospective, randomized, multicentre study, to be given omeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus either amoxycillin 1 g b.d. or clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. for 2 weeks. Cure was defined as the absence of H. pylori infection, 4–6 weeks after completing anti-microbial therapy, assessed by urease activity and histology of antral and body gastric biopsies.
Results : The bacteria were eradicated in 68/143 patients (48%) treated with amoxycillin and omeprazole and 70/144 patients (49%) treated with clarithromycin and omeprazole (intention-to-treat analysis). The ulcers were healed in 118/127 patients (93%) treated with amoxycillin and in 115/123 (94%) of those treated with clarithromycin. Undesirable effects were rare with both treatments.
Conclusions : Combined treatment with omeprazole plus either amoxycillin or clarithromycin produced a high percentage of short-term healing of ulcers and was well tolerated, but is not useful as first-line anti- Helicobacter pylori treatment.     

Addition of bismuth subnitrate to omeprazole plus amoxycillin improves eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Objective:

To evaluate whether the addition of bismuth subnitrate to a dual oral therapy regimen with omeprazole plus amoxycillin could improve Helico-bacter pylori eradication.

Methods:

Fifty consecutive Helicobacter pylori-positive patients were randomly enrolled to receive either (A) bismuth subnitrate (300 mg q.d.s.), omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (500 mg q.d.s.), or (B) omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (500 mg q.d.s.). Both groups (n = 25 each) received the medication for 14 days. H. pylori status was reassessed 30 days after completion of the therapy in order to evaluate eradication rates.

Results:

Six patients were lost to follow-up and therefore excluded from the study (three patients from each group). One patient from Group B withdrew from the study because of side-effects. The addition of bismuth subnitrate to omeprazole and amoxycillin significantly improved its efficacy in eradicating H. pylori, with 72% (18/25) eradication in Group A and 52% (13/25) in Group B (P = 0.027). The addition of bismuth subnitrate to dual oral therapy was also capable of improving the healing of peptic ulcers when compared with dual oral therapy alone (100%, 8/8 vs. 58%, 4/7; P = 0.021).

Conclusion:

Our results demonstrate that the addition of bismuth subnitrate to dual oral therapy enhances H. pylori eradication, and improves healing of peptic ulcers.

     

Amoxycillin resistance is one reason for failure of amoxycillin–omeprazole treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background:

The efficacy of omeprazole and amoxycillin dual therapy to treat Helicobacter pylori infection has been inconsistent, suggesting the presence of host or bacterial factors influencing treatment success. The aim of this study was to assess the role of pre-treatment amoxycillin resistance in the efficacy of omeprazole and amoxycillin dual therapy.

Methods:

We studied 43 consecutive dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection. Pre-treatment H. pylori infection was established by the combination of positive rapid urease test, culture and histology. Amoxycillin susceptibility testing was performed by an Epsilometer test (E-test) method and amoxycillin resistance was defined as minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 8 μg/mL. Patients received 20 mg omeprazole twice daily for 28 days and amoxycillin 1000 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Adverse effects were documented using a questionnaire. H. pylori status was reassessed 6–8 weeks after the end of treatment by rapid urease testing and histological examination of gastric biopsies.

Results:

Forty-two dyspeptic patients completed the study, and one patient dropped out. H. pylori infection was cured in 23 of 42 patients (55%). The cure rate was higher in patients harbouring amoxycillin-sensitive organisms than in those with resistant strains: 66% (19/29) vs. 31% (4/13), respectively (P = 0.049). No significant differences in cure rates were evident in relation to age, sex, smoking habits or compliance.

Conclusions:

The effectiveness of amoxycillin–omeprazole dual therapy was greatly reduced in the presence of pre-treatment amoxycillin-resistant H. pylori. The success rate in patients with amoxycillin-sensitive H. pylori was only 66%, suggesting the presence of additional factors affecting the efficacy of this therapy.

     

Dose-response of omeprazole combined with amoxycillin on duodenal ulcer healing and eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy using omeprazole and amoxycillin can cure Helicobacter pylori infection, but data are controversial concerning the efficacy of this regimen. The present study investigated varying doses of omeprazole combined with a standard amoxycillin dose on duodenal ulcer healing and eradication of H. pylori, in order to find an optimal dose regimen. METHODS: H. pylori-positive out-patients (n = 231) with duodenal ulcers were treated randomly and double-blind with either omeprazole 20, 40 or 80 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for 14 days. Patients with an unhealed ulcer after this therapy took omeprazole 20 mg o.m. for another month. RESULTS: After 2 weeks, ulcer healing rates in the three treatment groups were not statistically different (85, 82 and 93%, respectively). Treatment with omeprazole 80 mg b.d. was significantly better in curing H. pylori infection (eradication rate 69%) than treatment with omeprazole 20 and 40 mg b.d. (47 and 53%). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of either omeprazole 20 or 40 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d., is not sufficiently effective to be recommended as an anti-H. pylori therapy. Omeprazole 80 mg b.d. combined with amoxycillin is more efficient and well tolerated, but better treatment options now exist to cure H. pylori infection.     

Comparison of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin with omeprazole plus clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND: Many dual and triple therapy treatment regimens have been proposed for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. However, assessing the relative efficacy of these regimens is complicated by differences in study design, and few well-controlled comparative studies have been reported. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind study involved 530 duodenal ulcer patients, of whom 520 had confirmed H. pylori infection. Patients received 14 days b.d. dual therapy of either ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) 400 mg or omeprazole 20 mg, both with clarithromycin 500 mg to eradicate H. pylori, followed by a further 14 days of treatment with RBC 400 mg b. d. or omeprazole 20 mg o.d. to facilitate ulcer healing. H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing were assessed at least 26 days after the end of treatment. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 90% of patients who received RBC with clarithromycin and in 66% of patients who received omeprazole with clarithromycin (per protocol; P<0.001). intention-to-treat eradication rates were 77% and 60%, respectively (P<0.001). Ulcer healing rates were 97% in the RBC treatment group and 95% in the omeprazole treatment group. Only 3% and 1% of patients in the RBC and omeprazole treatment groups, respectively, were withdrawn due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: RBC with clarithromycin is a simple and highly effective dual therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori, and is significantly more effective than omeprazole with clarithromycin. Both treatment regimens are well tolerated and effectively heal duodenal ulcers.     

A randomized prospective comparison of clarithromycin versus amoxycillin in combination with omeprazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Aim: To compare H. pylori eradication rates using omeprazole in conjunction with either amoxycillin or clarithromycin. Background: Omeprazole with amoxycillin is the most widely used dual therapy regimen for eradication of H. pylori. A recent open study suggested a high eradication rate combining omeprazole with the newer macrolide, clarithromycin. Methods: A randomized prospective trial in 54 patients was conducted to compare 2 weeks of treatment with omeprazole 40 mg once daily and either amoxycillin 500 mg three times daily or clarithromycin 500 mg three times daily. H. pylori eradication was assessed using the ¹³C urea breath test. Results: Eradication was achieved in 18/26 (69.2%) of subjects treated with omeprazole and amoxycillin and 18/25 (72.0%) of those treated with omeprazole and clarithromycin (P= N.S.). Minor side effects, most commonly altered taste, were reported by 16% of patients and were more frequent in those randomized to clarithromycin (P= 0.01). Conclusions: These regimens are similarly effective. However, clarithromycin is more expensive, associated with a greater frequency of side effects and, unlike amoxycillin, resistance by H. pylori has been reported. This suggests that clarithromycin may be a useful alternative when there is penicillin allergy or previous treatment failure, but it should not replace amoxycillin as first choice in omeprazole-based dual therapy.     

Short report: omepmzole plus antibiotic combinations for the eradication of metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori

Twenty-eight Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with metronidazole-resistant isolates and 25 with metronidazole-sensitive isolates were treated for 14 days with 40 mg omeprazole nocte plus 500 mg amoxycillin t.d.s. Eradication of H. pylori, defined as absence of the organism one month after cessation of treatment, was assessed using the [14C]urea breath test. The eradication rate in patients with metronidazole-resistant isolates was 14/28 (50%) while that in patients was metronidazole-sensitive isolates was 12/25 (48%). In contrast to these encouraging eradication rates, very poor results were obtained with a 7-day course of omeprazole (40 mg nocte) in combination with erythromycin ethylsuccinate (500 mg q.d.s.) and tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate tablets (120 mg q.d.s.). The latter eradication rates were 3/20 (15%) in patients taking erythromycin tablets and 3/19 (16%) in those taking a liquid formulation of erythromycin. All treatment regimens were well tolerated and all patients completed the prescribed course of therapy.     

High effectiveness and safety of one-week antibiotic regimen in Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background: Helicobacter pylori is strongly associated with peptic ulcer: H. pylori eradication markedly decreases the recurrence rate of duodenal and gastric ulcer, but the optimum length of antibiotic therapy in the eradication of H. pylori is still unclear.
Aim: To verify the effectiveness and side-effect profile of an eradicating regimen consisting of omeprazole 20 mg daily for 4 weeks and, during the first week, combination antimicrobial treatment with tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. in patients with active duodenal and gastric ulcer.
Methods: One hundred and ninety-six duodenal ulcer patients and 27 gastric ulcer patients with H. pylori infection were admitted into an open prospective study. Compliance was assessed by an accurate interview.
Results: Overall, H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 201 of 223 patients (intention-to-treat 90.1%; 95% CI=85–94%): 176 of 196 duodenal ulcer patients became H. pylori- negative (89.8%; CI=85–94%) as well as 25 of 27 gastric ulcer patients (92.6%; CI=76–99%). Compliance was excellent in 221 of 223 (99.1%) patients evaluated as having taken all the medication as prescribed. Sixteen patients (7.2%) developed mild side effects during treatment.
Conclusion: This combination treatment had excellent results with almost absolute compliance and a very low rate of minor side effects.     

The importance of the level of metronidazole resistance for the success of Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIMS: To evaluate the role of antibiotic susceptibility for the treatment outcome of proton pump inhibitor-dependent and independent Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled clinical study of peptic ulcer patients with H. pylori infection, patients were randomized to receive lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily with lansoprazole or with placebo. Helicobacter pylori status was assessed by culture and antibiotic susceptibility by E-test minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 205 clinical isolates. RESULTS: Primary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole was 1 and 76%, respectively. In metronidazole susceptible strains eradication rates were similar at > 90% for all treatment groups (P = 0.49). With low-level metronidazole resistance (4 microg/mL < MIC < 256 microg/mL), eradication rates were similar at >75% (P = 0.80). The major difference was found at high-level metronidazole resistance (MIC >or= 256 microg/mL) with 95%, 58% and 21% eradication in the lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily and placebo, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily groups, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the absence of antibiotic resistance, a once-daily therapy of only clarithromycin and tinidazole can achieve a high rate of H. pylori eradication. Such a combination could offer a simpler and cheaper treatment option for developing countries. The standard, twice-daily proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy was shown to be efficient in H. pylori eradication even in the presence of high-level metronidazole resistance.     

增加埃索美拉唑剂量根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效观察

目的评价增加埃索美拉唑剂量是否能够安全有效提高根治幽门螺杆菌的根治率。方法收集我院幽门螺杆菌阳性慢性胃炎患者210例,随机分为对照组及治疗组,两组使用抗生素均为阿莫西林1．0gBid,克拉霉素0．5Bid,疗程14d。对照组服用埃索美拉唑20mgBid,治疗组服用埃索美拉唑40mgBid;两组在治疗后停药4周后,用C—UBT检测幽门螺杆菌根治情况,统计两组不良反应发生率。结果治疗组幽门螺杆菌根治率、不良反应发生率分别为86．81％、6．59％,对照组分别为72．16％、4．12％。两组对比,幽门螺杆菌根治率差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;而不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论适当增加埃索美拉唑剂量提高幽门螺杆菌的根治率既安全又有效。     

An increasing dose of omeprazole combined with amoxycillin cures Helicobacter pylori infection more effectively

Background : The combination of omeprazole and amoxycillin has demonstrated effectiveness with very few side-effects in the treatment of H. pylori infection, however cure rates have varied widely. The present study addresses the question as to the extent to which the cure rate of H. pylori infection depends on the size of the daily omeprazole dose, and investigates other patient-related factors that influence treatment success.
Methods : In a randomized, controlled and investigator-blinded trial, 163 hospitalized patients with H. pylori -associated gastritis were treated with 20 mg omeprazole once daily in the morning, 20 mg omeprazole b.d., 40 mg omeprazole b.d. or 60 mg omeprazole b.d. for 14 days. In addition, all patients received 1000 mg amoxycillin b.d. on days 5–14. Endoscopic and histological examinations were performed prior to treatment, at the end of treatment and 4 weeks after completion of treatment.
Results : H. pylori infection was cured in 18 of 40 (45%, 95% CI: 29–62%), in 22 of 39 (56.4%, 95% CI: 40–72%), in 25 of 38 (65.8%, 95% CI: 49–80%), and in 33 of 40 (82.5%, 95% CI: 67–93%) patients, respectively, ( P <0.001). Side-effects leading to discontinuation of treatment occurred in only 1.2%.
Conclusion : The daily dose of omeprazole is an important factor for the success of dual therapy comprising omeprazole and amoxycillin in curing H. pylori infection. Cure of H. pylori infection correlates positively and significantly with the size of the daily omeprazole dose. The combination of high-dose omeprazole and amoxycillin is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of H. pylori -associated diseases.     

Impact of intravenous omeprazole on Helicobacter pylori eradication by triple therapy in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding

AIM: To test the impact of intravenous omeprazole on Helicobacter pylori eradication for bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS: A total of 175 H. pylori-infected patients with bleeding peptic ulcers were randomized into either an omeprazole group or a ranitidine group, receiving intravenous omeprazole or ranitidine for 3 days after endoscopy. Afterwards, 1-week triple therapy was used to eradicate H. pylori for both groups. Six weeks later, either a 13C-urea breath test or follow-up endoscopy was performed to assess the success of H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: The rebleeding rate was lower in the omeprazole group vs. the ranitidine group (6% vs. 17%, P < 0.05). The H. pylori eradication rate was higher in the omeprazole group (intention-to-treat analysis: 83% vs. 66%, P < 0.05; per protocol analysis: 93% vs. 80%, P < 0.05). For patients with duodenal ulcers, the per protocol H. pylori eradication rate of the omeprazole group was higher than that of the ranitidine group (93% vs. 73%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous omeprazole can decrease the risk of rebleeding of peptic ulcers. For duodenal ulcers, in particular, intravenous omeprazole may even improve the H. pylori eradication rate of the subsequent triple therapy.     

Randomized study comparing omeprazole with ranitidine as anti-secretory agents combined in quadruple second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the efficacy of second-line H. pylori eradication regimens. AIM: To compare the efficacy of either omeprazole or ranitidine in a second-line quadruple regimen in patients with duodenal ulcer or erosive duodenitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 37 patients with erosive duodenitis and 119 with duodenal ulcer who have failed eradication of H. pylori with double or triple regimens, without metronidazole, were randomly assigned to receive tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate 600 mg t.d.s. + metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s. + tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg t.d. s. combined with either omeprazole 20 mg b.d. (group O, 78 patients) or ranitidine 300 mg b.d. (group R, 78 patients) for 14 days. H. pylori eradication was verified by histology, rapid urease test and 13C-urea breath test. STATISTICS: t-test, chi2-test. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients had a post-treatment endoscopy. Eradication rates were: intention-to-treat: group O 77% (67-87), group R 76% (66-85), P=0.85; per protocol analysis: group O 86% (77-95), group R 82 (71-93), P=0.58. Side-effects were frequent but mild. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 20 mg b.d. and ranitidine 300 mg b.d. were equally effective as antisecretory agents combined in a second-line quadruple eradication regimen.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate versus omeprazole triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and healing of duodenal ulcer

Aim:

To compare the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with omeprazole plus amoxycillin and clarithromycin vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxycillin and clarithromycin in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated duodenal ulcers.

Methods:

Eighty-one patients with duodenal ulcers were randomized to the following treatments: 39 cases with amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 1 week plus omeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 2 weeks (omeprazole + amoxycillin + clarithromycin (OAC)), and 42 cases to the same regimen of amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 7 days plus ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 2 weeks (ranitidine bismuth citrate + amoxycillin + clarithromycin (RbAC)). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed together with a rapid urease test and histological examination of antral and corpus biopsy samples prior to treatment and 4 weeks after the end of therapy.

Results:

Thirty-four patients in the OAC group and 38 in the RbAC group completed the treatment and 4-week follow-up. H. pylori was eradicated in 30 of 34 patients (88%) in the OAC group and in 32 of 38 patients (84%) in the RbAC group according to a per-protocol analysis (P = N.S.). Thirty-three (97%) patients treated with OAC and 36 (95%) treated with RbAC presented healed duodenal ulcers at 4 weeks (P = N.S.). On an intention-to-treat basis there was no difference in H. pylori eradication between the OAC (77%) and RbAC groups (76%); duodenal ulcer healing was achieved in 85 and 86% of patients in the OAC and RbAC groups, re- spectively (P = N.S.).

Conclusion:

The OAC and RbAC triple therapy regimens proved equally effective in both H. pylori eradication and in duodenal ulcer healing.

     

Omeprazole-amoxycillin versus omeprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

AIM: To assess the effect of adding clarithromycin to the combination of omeprazole and amoxycillin for the eradication of H. pylori infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open, randomized, three-centre study 120 patients (69 men, mean age 47 years, caucasians 74%) with symptoms of dyspepsia had normal gastroscopic examination and a positive urease test. They underwent a 13C-urea breath test and received, for 14 days, either omeprazole 40 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 750 mg b.d., or the same regimen plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. Compliance was assessed by returned tablet counts. H. pylori clearance at the end of treatment and eradication 4 weeks after finishing treatment were assessed by 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Results are expressed according to 'all patients treated analysis', excluding patients who did not receive treatment and patients who had no final 13C-urea breath test assessment. In the groups treated with omeprazole- amoxycillin or omeprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin good compliance (> or = 90%) was observed in 85% vs. 76% (N.S.) of patients but 25% vs. 34% (N.S.) experienced at least one adverse event. Adverse events were minor, and no patient reported a metallic taste. Four weeks after finishing treatment eradication rates were 26% (95% CI: 15-37%) vs. 93% (95% CI: 86-99%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results show that dual therapy with omeprazole plus amoxycillin achieves an unacceptably low H. pylori eradication rate. Addition of clarithromycin at low dosage (250 mg b.d.) proved to be useful, achieving a high eradication rate without increasing side-effects.     

Efficacy and safety of single-triple capsules of bismuth biskalcitrate,metronidazole and tetracycline,given with omeprazole,for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: an international multicentre study

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole demands treatments more effective than standard bismuth-based triple therapy against these strains. AIM: To evaluate the H. pylori eradication rate in both metronidazole-sensitive and -resistant strains following quadruple therapy using single-triple capsules of bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline, given with omeprazole. METHODS: One hundred and seventy valid patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia were treated in eight centres located in five countries. H. pylori was confirmed at baseline using 13C-urea breath test, histology and/or culture. Patients received three single-triple capsules q.i.d. and omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., for 10 days. Each capsule contained bismuth biskalcitrate, 140 mg (as 40 mg Bi2O3 equivalent), metronidazole, 125 mg, and tetracycline, 125 mg. 13C-Urea breath test was repeated at least 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: Overall eradication rates were 93% (158/170) by modified intention-to-treat analysis and 97% (142/146) by per protocol analysis. Eradication rates were 93% (40/43) and 95% (38/40) for strains resistant to metronidazole and 95% (82/86) and 99% (75/76) for strains sensitive to metronidazole by modified intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: This omeprazole-bismuth biskalcitrate-metronidazole-tetracycline 10-day regimen is a very effective and well-tolerated treatment, which overcomes metronidazole resistance.     

Meta-analysis: high-dose proton pump inhibitors vs. standard dose in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background The evidence on whether high‐dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increase cure rates of Helicobacter pylori treatment has not been previously assessed. Aim To evaluate the evidence on the usefulness of high‐dose PPI in standard triple therapy by performing a systematic review and a meta‐analysis. Methods A systematic search was performed in multiple databases and in the abstracts submitted to the Digestive Diseases Week, the European Helicobacter Study Group congress and the United European Gastroenterology Week. Randomized trials comparing a standard dose of a PPI with high‐dose PPI both twice a day in triple therapy combining a PPI plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole were selected. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for all comparisons were calculated using Review Manager. Results Six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All used triple therapy for 7 days. A mean intention‐to‐treat cure rate of 82% was achieved with high‐dose PPI and one of 74% with standard dose (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01–1.17). Subgroup analysis showed that the maximum increase was observed when the PPI compared were omeprazole 20 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg vs. esomeprazole 40 mg. Conclusion High‐dose PPI seems more effective than standard‐dose for curing H. pylori infection in 7‐day triple therapy.     

First-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori in primary health care based on antibiotic resistance: results of three eradication regimens

AIM: To determine the efficacy of three Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens and factors affecting the eradication results in Finland. METHODS: A total of 342 H. pylori-positive adult patients from primary health care referred for gastroscopy at 23 centres in different parts of Finland were randomized to receive either (i) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. (LAM), (ii) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (LAC), or (iii) ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. and tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s. (RMT). A (13)C-urea breath test was performed 4 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: The eradication result could be assessed in 329 cases. Intention-to-treat cure rates of LAM, LAC, and RMT were 78, 91 and 81%. The difference was significant between LAM and LAC (P = 0.01) and between LAC and RMT (P = 0.04). The eradication rates in cases with metronidazole-susceptible vs. -resistant isolates were for LAM 93% vs. 53% (P = 0.00001), for LAC 95% vs. 84%, and for RMT 91% vs. 67% (P = 0.002). Previous antibiotic use, smoking, and coffee drinking reduced the efficacy of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients in primary health care, LAC was the most effective first-line eradication.